2026-01-20
The Bank of Mozambique issued Circular No. 01/EFI/2026 mandating credit institutions and financial companies to report technological and cyber incidents using standardized preliminary, intermediate, and final reporting models submitted via the BSA Portal or email. The directive establishes strict submission deadlines of 24 hours, 10 business days, and 30 business days respectively, while requiring detailed classification of incidents by nature and severity alongside comprehensive impact assessments across reputational, financial, and operational dimensions. Institutions must also submit aggregated statistical reports and explanatory notes to align with prior Notice No. 8/GBM/2025, with the circular taking effect on March 9, 2026.
Bank of Mozambique Administration
FINANCIAL STABILITY DEPARTMENT CIRCULAR NO. 01/EFI/2026
Maputo, January 14, 2026
SUBJECT: MODEL FOR REPORTING TECHNOLOGICAL AND CYBER INCIDENTS
The Bank of Mozambique established, through Notice No. 8/GBM/2025, of December 9, the guidelines for reporting technological and cyber incidents. Under this Notice, credit institutions and financial companies must report technological and cyber incidents by completing reporting models to be defined by Circular.
Therefore, pursuant to paragraph 1 of Article 5 and subparagraph b) of Article 8 of the aforementioned Notice, the Bank of Mozambique determines:
1
Bank of Mozambique Administration
Questions regarding the interpretation and application of this Circular must be submitted to the Prudential Supervision Department of the Bank of Mozambique.
Maria Esperança Majimeja (Administrator)
2
Annex I - Model for Reporting Technological and Cyber Incidents
| Preliminary | [ ] | Within 24 hours, counted from the moment of occurrence |
| Intermediate | [ ] | Within 10 business days, counted from the moment of submission of the preliminary report |
| Final | [ ] | Within 30 business days, after the preliminary report |
| Incident Identification: | |
|---|---|
| Institution Code | |
| Fiscal Year | |
| Date | |
| Reporting Time to BM |
| A - Preliminary Report |
|---|
| Contact Details (1) |
| Contact 1 |
| Name: |
| Position: |
| Phone: |
| Contact 2 (if available) |
| Name: |
| Position: |
| Phone: |
| Incident Details (2) |
| Occurrence Date |
| Time |
| Incident Type |
| Incident Description |
| B - Intermediate Report |
|---|
| (1) Information on the origin |
1
| (2) Is there a relation to another incident reported previously? | [ ] Yes <br> [ ] No | Provide details: <br> Date: <br> Time: |
|---|---|---|
| (3) Affected components | [ ] Workstations (laptops, PCs, mobile devices) <br> [ ] Operating Systems <br> [ ] Core systems (computer systems supporting business areas) <br> [ ] Peripheral systems (computer systems supporting control and support areas) <br> [ ] Digital channels (internet banking, mobile applications) <br> [ ] Data management and storage systems (file servers, databases, data warehouse) <br> [ ] Office applications <br> [ ] Email <br> [ ] Networks and telecommunications (switches, routers, firewalls, PBX, VoIP, call center) <br> [ ] Servers <br> [ ] Middleware components (processors, intermediate layer equipment) <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ |
| (4) Affected Areas |
|---|
| (4.1) Affected business areas |
| (4.2) Affected control areas |
| (4.3) Affected support areas |
2
| TECHNOLOGICAL INCIDENT |
|---|
| (5) Classification of the incident according to nature |
| CYBER INCIDENT |
| Abusive content <br> [ ] SPAM <br> [ ] Hate crime <br> [ ] Pornography <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ <br><br> Malicious code <br> [ ] Worm <br> [ ] Trojan <br> [ ] Spyware <br> [ ] Dialler <br> [ ] Rootkit <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ <br><br> Information gathering <br> [ ] Scanning <br> [ ] Sniffing <br> [ ] Social engineering <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ |
3
| Intrusion attempt <br> [ ] Exploitation of known vulnerabilities <br> [ ] Access attempt with credential breach <br> [ ] Unknown attack <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ <br><br> Intrusion <br> [ ] Compromise of privileged account <br> [ ] Compromise of an unprivileged account <br> [ ] Compromise of applications <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ <br><br> Availability <br> [ ] DoS (Denial-of-Service) <br> [ ] DDoS (Distributed Denial-of-Service) <br> [ ] Misconfiguration <br> [ ] Sabotage <br> [ ] Disruptions <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ <br><br> Information compromise <br> [ ] Unauthorized access to information <br> [ ] Unauthorized alteration of information <br> [ ] Data loss <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ <br><br> Fraud <br> [ ] Unauthorized use of resources <br> [ ] Copyright infringement <br> [ ] Identity theft <br> [ ] Phishing <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ <br><br> APT (Advanced Penetration Threat) <br> Others (to be specified) | | :--- | :--- | | (6) Classification of the incident according to severity | [ ] Critical <br> [ ] High <br> [ ] Medium | | (7) What actions or responses were taken by the institution | | | (8) Incident identified by: | [ ] Cybersecurity or IS security <br> [ ] Information Technologies <br> [ ] Internal audit <br> [ ] External audit <br> [ ] Service provider <br> [ ] Client <br> [ ] Employee <br> [ ] Others. Specify: _________ |
4
| (9) Incident impact |
|---|
| (9.1) Reputational impact |
| (9.2) Financial impact |
| (9.3) Operational impact |
| (10) Service providers originating the incident |
5
| (11) Was the incident resolved? | [ ] Yes <br><br> [ ] No | Measures taken for incident resolution <br><br> Proposed remediation actions <br> |
|---|---|---|
| Remediation Action | ||
6
C - Final Report Investigation and incident resolution
| 1. Sequential order of events | |
|---|---|
| (1.1) Duration of disruption | HH:MM |
| (1.2) Description of origin | |
| (1.3) What was the incident's entry vector? | [ ] Internal agent (institution employees) <br> [ ] External agent (service providers) <br> [ ] Natural disasters <br> [ ] Cut or interruption of electricity supply <br> [ ] Cut or interruption of telecommunications services <br> [ ] Technological infrastructure equipment <br> [ ] Internet network <br> [ ] Instant messaging <br> [ ] Telephone <br> [ ] Administrative credentials <br> [ ] Email <br> [ ] Unauthorized devices <br> [ ] Lost/stolen devices <br> [ ] Social networks <br> [ ] Security vulnerabilities <br> [ ] Phishing or pop-ups on Web forms <br> [ ] Social engineering <br> [ ] Malicious internal threats <br> [ ] Spoofing <br> [ ] Identity-based attacks <br> [ ] Code injection attacks <br> [ ] Other (please specify) _________ |
| (1.4) Exposed vulnerabilities/weaknesses | [ ] Obsolete equipment <br> [ ] Unupdated software (firmware and applications) <br> [ ] Inadequate patch management [ ] Inadequate privileged account management <br> [ ] Inadequate email/web browser protection <br> [ ] Inadequate malware defenses <br> [ ] Inadequate access management <br> [ ] Inadequate hardware security configurations (terminal devices, laptops, workstations, servers) <br> [ ] Inadequate software security configurations <br> [ ] Inadequate security perimeter configuration <br> [ ] Inadequate control of network ports, protocols, and services <br> [ ] Inadequate backup of systems or files <br> [ ] Insecure network devices (firewalls, routers, switches) <br> [ ] Inadequate application software security controls (web-based applications and others) <br> [ ] Inadequate DDoS defense <br> [ ] Inadequate penetration and security testing <br> [ ] Inadequate network segmentation <br> [ ] Lack of team awareness and/or compliance <br> [ ] Inadequate log maintenance and monitoring |
7
| [ ] Staff shortage <br> [ ] Weak cryptography <br><br> Others. Specify: _________ | |
|---|---|
| (1.5) Was the incident internally escalated to top management, at group level, for actions outside usual procedures? | [ ] No <br><br> [ ] Yes |
| (1.6) Stakeholders informed or involved | [ ] No <br><br> [ ] Yes |
| (1.7) Escalation measures taken, including approvals requested on provisional measures to mitigate the event and reasons for taking such measures | |
| (1.8) Did the occurrence require activation of crisis management procedures? | [ ] No <br><br> [ ] Yes |
| (1.9) Who is leading the incident investigation? | [ ] The institution <br> [ ] Service provider <br> [ ] Police authorities or other security agencies <br> [ ] If other, specify: ________________ |
| (1.10) Who is leading the remediation actions | [ ] The institution <br> [ ] Service provider <br> [ ] If other, specify: ________________ |
| (1.11) Factors that caused the problem/ Reasons for occurrence, cause and effects of the incident | |
| (1.12) Was the action plan defined for the resolution of the | [ ] Yes |
8
| incident was fully complied with | [ ] No | If no, state the reasons |
|---|---|---|
| (1.13) Corrective actions taken to prevent future occurrences of similar types of incidents | [ ] No <br><br> [ ] Yes | Steps identified or to be taken to resolve the incident long-term |
| (2) Final assessment and remediation: | ||
| (2.1) Direct and indirect financial losses in Meticais | ||
| (2.2) Conclusion on cause | ||
| (2.3) Summary of similar incidents caused by the same root cause in the last 12 months | ||
| (2.4) Other complementary information | ||
| (2.5) Was there notification to the client/public announcement/report to other relevant regulatory bodies regarding the incident resolution? | [ ] No <br><br> [ ] Yes | Description of the mechanism adopted to communicate the incident to the client/public announcement/report to other relevant regulatory bodies |
| (2.6) Was the incident resolved? | [ ] Yes | Indicate the resolution date |
| [ ] No | Submit to the Bank an action plan with proposals for incident resolution and respective deadlines for monitoring | |
| Remediation Action | ||
9
Annex II - Model for Aggregated Reporting of Technological and Cyber Incidents
I. STATISTICAL INFORMATION (QUANTITATIVE)
| (1) Total incidents reported by the institution | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution Code | ||||||||
| Fiscal Year | ||||||||
| Date | ||||||||
| Reporting Time to BM | ||||||||
| (2) Incident Classification | (3) Exposed Vulnerability | (4) Incident Frequency | (5) Reported Incident IDs | (6) Entry Vector | (7) Affected Components | (8) Affected Services (support, control, or business area) | (9) No. Compromised Transactions | |
| (2.1) According to nature | (2.2) According to severity | |||||||
| <Example of completion: Spam> | <high> | <weak cryptography> | <2> | <dim01> | <internet network> | OS | IT | <10> |
| <dim02> | <instant message> | core system | markets | <5> |
10
II. ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF REPORTED INCIDENTS IN THE PERIOD
<Place the global description of the incident impact based on the following table>| (12) Reputational | |
|---|---|
| (13) Financial | |
| (14) Operational |
III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
| (15) Other information considered relevant: |
|---|
We declare that the information contained in Annex II - Model for Aggregated Reporting of Cyber Incidents is in accordance with the record of cyber incidents that occurred at the institution during the reported period.
Signature of Board of Directors member
Signature of responsible person
<Place>, on <Date>
11
1. EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE CYBER INCIDENT REPORTING MODEL
A. Preliminary Report
| Column | Description | Data type |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | Contact details of information responsible persons | Text |
| (2) | Incident details | Text |
B. Intermediate Report
| Column | Description | Data type |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | Indication of incident origin | Text |
| (2) | Indication of the reported incident's relation to other incidents | Text |
| (3) | Description of the incident regarding affected components | Text |
| (4) | Indication of affected areas (business, control, and support) | Text |
| (5) | Classification of the incident according to nature per Annex II of the incident reporting Notice | Text |
| (6) | Classification of the incident according to severity per Annex I of the incident reporting Notice | Text |
| (7) | Description of actions taken for incident resolution | Text |
| (8) | Indication of the mechanism used to identify the incident | Text |
| (9) | Description of the incident's impact at reputational, financial, and operational levels | Alphanumeric (Text/ Number) |
| (10) | Indication of incident origin and affected service provider | Text |
| (11) | Indication of incident status considering resolution level and time | Text |
12
C. Final Report
| Column | Description | Data type |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | Detailed description of investigations conducted considering origin, vulnerabilities, and actions taken for resolution | |
| (1.1) | Indication of incident duration in hours | Integer |
| (1.2) | Detailed description of the intruder originating the incident | Text |
| (1.3) | Indication of mechanisms used in the intrusion | Text |
| (1.4) | Indication of weaknesses/vulnerabilities the system was exposed to | Text |
| (1.5) | Description of escalation level in incident management | Text |
| (1.6) | Indication of parties involved in incident resolution | Text |
| (1.7) | Indication of measures taken considering approval levels | Text |
| (1.8) | Description of crisis management procedures activated for incident mitigation | Text |
| (1.9) | Indication of the party responsible for incident investigation | Text |
| (1.10) | Indication of the party responsible for incident remediation | Text |
| (1.11) | Indication of the incident cause | Text |
| (1.12) | Indication of the action plan compliance level in incident resolution | Text |
| (1.13) | Description of corrective actions implemented to prevent incident recurrence | Text |
| (2) | Detailed description of incident nature, economic impacts, lessons learned | |
| (2.1) | Amount of direct and indirect financial losses resulting from incident occurrence | Numeric |
| (2.2) | Detailed description regarding incident origin | Text |
| (2.3) | Description of incidents with the same root cause occurring in the last 12 months | Text |
| (2.4) | Description of other relevant information not captured in previous items | Text |
| (2.5) | Description of the type of notification carried out after incident resolution | Text |
| (2.6) | Description of incident status | Text |
13
2. EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE AGGREGATED CYBER INCIDENT REPORTING MODEL
I. STATISTICAL INFORMATION (QUANTITATIVE)
| Column | Description | Data type |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | Indication of the number of incidents reported in the reference period | Integer |
| (2.1) | Classify the incident according to nature per Annex II of the incident reporting Notice | Text |
| (2.2) | Classify the incident according to severity per Annex I of the incident reporting Notice | Text |
| (3) | Indication of weaknesses/vulnerabilities the system was exposed to | Text |
| (4) | Indication of the number of times the incident occurred | Integer |
| (5) | Indication of the reported incident's identification number | Integer |
| (6) | Indication of the mechanism used by the intruder | Text |
| (7) | Indication of affected components and systems | Text |
| (8) | Indication of affected services, business, support, and control areas | Text |
| (9) | Indication of the total number of transactions affected by the incident | Integer |
| (10) | Indication of the total number of users affected by the incident | Integer |
| (11) | Indication of incident status considering resolution level | Text |
14
II. ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF REPORTED INCIDENTS IN THE PERIOD
| Column | Description | Data type |
|---|---|---|
| (12) | Description of the magnitude of the aggregated impact (whether national or international) and the level of media disclosure of incidents occurring in the period | Text |
| (13) | Total amount of direct and indirect financial losses resulting from incident occurrence | Number |
| (14) | Indication of the total number of hours of service unavailability | Number |
III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
| Column | Description | Data type |
|---|---|---|
| (15) | Description of other relevant information not captured in previous items | Text |
15