2026-01-23
The Council for the Financial Market has issued a regulation establishing practical, risk-based measures for stockbrokers, portfolio management companies, and crowdfunding service providers to combat money laundering, terrorism financing, and weapons proliferation. The regulation mandates comprehensive customer due diligence, including strict identity verification for regular and occasional clients, enhanced monitoring of politically exposed persons, and mandatory screening against national and international sanctions lists. Establishments are required to maintain internal risk mappings, freeze assets of designated entities without prior notification, and designate qualified contact points to ensure continuous compliance with targeted financial sanctions.
Council of the Financial Market Regulation dated January 23, 2026, setting forth practical measures for combating money laundering, countering terrorism financing and proliferation of weapons.
The Council of the Financial Market,
Having regard to Organic Law No. 2015-26 of August 7, 2015 on combating terrorism and money laundering, as amended and supplemented by Organic Law No. 2019-9 of January 23, 2019 and notably its Articles 107 and 115,
Having regard to Law No. 94-117 of November 14, 1994 reorganizing the financial market, as amended and supplemented by subsequent texts, including the most recent Law No. 2019-47 of May 29, 2019 on improving the investment climate and notably its Articles 28, 29, 31, 40, 42, 48 and 52,
Having regard to Law No. 2020-37 of August 6, 2020 on "Crowdfunding",
Having regard to Decree No. 99-2478 of November 1, 1999 on the status of stockbrokers, as amended and supplemented by Decree No. 2007-1678 of July 5, 2007 and notably its Articles 50 bis, 65 bis, 86 new and 86 bis,
Having regard to Decree No. 2006-1294 of May 8, 2006 implementing Article 23 of Law No. 2005-96 of October 18, 2005 on strengthening the security of financial relations, as amended and supplemented by Decree No. 2009-1502 of May 18, 2009 and notably its Articles 6 and 6 ter,
Having regard to Governmental Decree No. 2019-54 of January 21, 2019 on the procedures and criteria for establishing beneficial owners,
Having regard to Governmental Decree No. 2019-419 of May 17, 2019 on the procedures for implementing resolutions adopted by competent UN bodies related to combating terrorism financing and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, as amended and supplemented by Governmental Decree No. 2019-457 of May 31, 2019,
Having regard to Decree No. 2022-765 of October 19, 2022 regulating "Crowdfunding" activity in securities investment,
Having regard to the Council for the Financial Market Regulation on collective investment schemes in securities and portfolio management companies for third parties, as referred to by the Minister of Finance Order of April 29, 2010 and as amended by the Regulation referred to by the Minister of Finance Order of February 15, 2013 and notably its Articles 82, 84 and 152,
Having regard to the Council for the Financial Market Regulation of November 11, 2024 on the conditions for exercising securities investment crowdfunding activity and notably its Article 37,
Having regard to the Tunisian Financial Analysis Commission Decision No. 2017-03 of March 2, 2017 on beneficial owners, as amended by Decision No. 2018-10 of June 8, 2018,
Having regard to the Tunisian Financial Analysis Commission Decision No. 2024-01 of June 27, 2024 setting out guiding principles on the reporting of suspicious operations and transactions.
Enacts the regulation as follows:
Article 1 – This regulation sets forth application measures based on the risk-based approach to be applied, for combating money laundering, countering terrorism financing and proliferation of weapons, by stockbrokers, securities portfolio management companies for third parties, and crowdfunding service providers investing in securities, hereinafter referred to as "establishments".
Art. 2 - The definitions provided by Organic Law No. 2015-26 of August 7, 2015 cited above apply to the following terms:
Art. 3 - For the purposes of this regulation, the following terms mean:
Art. 4 - Establishments must identify, assess and understand the specific risks related to money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation of weapons to which they are exposed based on their clients, products, services, distribution channels and geographical areas of activity. Based on this assessment, they must apply necessary due diligence, monitoring and control measures proportionate to the identified risk level.
Establishments must also document the risk assessment and make available to controllers of the Council for the Financial Market all documents, studies and statistics used in developing this assessment.
Art. 5 - Establishments must refrain from opening or holding secret accounts, whose origin is unknown or under fictitious names.
They must, when establishing the business relationship, verify by means of official documents and other documents emanating from independent and reliable sources, the complete identity of the client, their activity, address as well as the purpose and nature of the business relationship, and record all necessary data capable of identifying them.
When the client designates a person to represent them, establishments must verify that the authorized representative is duly authorized to act on behalf of the client and verify their complete identity, obtaining data proving the relationship linking them to the client, even when such designation occurs after the business relationship has been established.
The identity verification obligation applies to occasional clients when they execute occasional financial transactions or operations with a value equal to or greater than the amount set by current legislative and regulatory texts, or in the form of electronic transfers, whether executed in a single operation or several linked operations.
Establishments must also comply with the identity verification obligation when there is:
The client identity verification obligation does not apply to companies listed on the Tunis Stock Exchange and public enterprises.
Art. 6 - If circumstances of the transaction or operation indicate that it is performed or may be performed for the benefit of a third party, the identity verification obligation on establishments extends to the beneficial owner of the transaction or operation.
Art. 7 - Subject to account opening procedures for clients provided by regulatory texts governing the financial market, establishments must adopt a multidimensional approach regarding client identification, their representative and beneficial owner by combining different information sources to ensure transparency of effective ownership, and collect at least the following data as part of identification:
When it concerns a natural person:
The aforementioned data are verified notably based on the national identity card for Tunisians and an official recognized identification document bearing a photo, address and holder's activity for foreigners.
When it concerns a legal entity or legal structure:
The aforementioned data are verified notably based on articles of association, a commercial register extract or an extract from the National Business Register, a deed of incorporation and any equivalent official document or other document emanating from reliable and independent sources, when the legal entity or legal structure is registered abroad.
Establishments must consult the original documents on which the data provided by this article were verified and obtain copies that must be recorded in a dedicated file for each client.
Art. 8 - Establishments must take necessary measures to verify, when establishing the business relationship or executing an occasional transaction or operation and subsequently on a periodic basis, that the client or beneficial owner does not appear on the list of persons or organizations whose link to terrorist crimes is established by competent international bodies or by the National Commission for Combating Terrorism.
They must also proceed to freeze assets belonging to persons or organizations referred to in the first paragraph of this article and make the corresponding declaration, in accordance with Article 103 of Organic Law No. 2015-26 of August 7, 2015 cited above.
Art. 9 - Establishments must take necessary measures to verify, when establishing the business relationship or executing an occasional transaction or operation and subsequently on a periodic basis, that the client or beneficial owner is not registered on the list of persons or entities subject to targeted financial sanctions related to preventing, combating and interrupting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and its financing as established by the competent national authority with legal authority to implement and enforce targeted financial sanctions in accordance with prevailing legislation.
Establishments must also:
The freezing obligation extends to:
Art. 10 - Establishments must designate among their directors or employees a contact point with the National Commission for Combating Terrorism and its deputy. They must communicate to the commission the decision designating the contact point and deputy, indicating their status, function as well as telephone and fax numbers and electronic address.
Designated persons must possess the adequate hierarchical level, competence and experience required to perform their duties independently and effectively.
The contact point with the commission is responsible for verifying that:
Establishments must make available to the contact point all necessary data, documents and registers for performing their duties.
Art. 11 - Establishments must take enhanced measures when the risk level is high. They must notably exercise heightened vigilance regarding accounts of persons representing a high risk, business relationships and transactions with residents of countries and territories designated by the Financial Action Task Force as presenting high risk or non-cooperative, as well as clients conducting exclusively remote transactions.
Establishments may apply reduced due diligence measures for certain clients provided that the risks associated with them are identified and assessed as low, and that this assessment aligns with the national risk assessment for money laundering, terrorism financing and proliferation of weapons. They may also resort to simplified measures to manage and mitigate identified risks. However, it is prohibited to apply reduced measures when there is a suspicion of money laundering, terrorism financing or proliferation of weapons financing, or when the risk level is high.
Art. 12 - Establishments that rely on a third party to establish business relationships or execute transactions or occasional operations must:
Where establishments rely on a third party belonging to the same group, they must ensure that group entities apply due diligence measures and procedures regarding combating money laundering, countering terrorism financing and proliferation of weapons that cover the reliance on a third party to establish business relationships or execute transactions or occasional operations, and guarantee the exchange of information regarding necessary due diligence or unusual activity reports between them.
Where a contract is concluded with a third party, it must stipulate the obligations incumbent on the third party as provided in items 3 to 5 of the first paragraph of this article.
When establishments have not been able to take the due diligence measures provided in the first and second paragraphs of this article, they must refrain from relying on the third party.
In all cases, reliance on a third party does not exempt establishments from their responsibility regarding compliance with prevailing provisions related to combating money laundering and countering terrorism financing and proliferation of weapons, and more particularly their responsibility regarding client identity verification.
Art. 13 - Establishments must exercise particular vigilance regarding business relationships that do not involve the physical presence of the parties.
To this end, they must:
Art. 14 - Establishments must exercise particular vigilance regarding business relationships with risk-related politically exposed persons due to their functions and with their spouses, ascendants and descendants up to the first degree and with persons closely associated with them notably those maintaining close business ties with them.
To this end, establishments must: