2018-12-23
The Bank of Israel amended Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive no. 472 to explicitly permit merchant acquirers to refuse services to merchants suspected of fraud, deception, or unfair influence on customers. The regulation defines reasonable refusal criteria, such as high chargeback rates and complaints, particularly when elderly customers are involved, and mandates that acquirers establish internal policies for implementation. Acquirers must notify merchants of such refusals unless prevented by legal impediments, with the amendment taking effect within three months of publication.
Bank of Israel Banking Supervision Department Bank–Customer Division Regulation (Bank–Customer) Unit 1 December 23, 2018 Circular Number C-06-2583 To: The banking corporations and credit card companies Issue: Merchant acquirers and acquiring payment card transactions (Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive no. 472) Introduction
Bank of Israel Banking Supervision Department Bank–Customer Division Regulation (Bank–Customer) Unit 2 passed allowing acquirers to also report to the Fair Trade Authority, which will publish a list of merchants for which acquiring should be ceased, and in parallel the Authority will report on merchants that act unfairly toward customers. The updates to the directive 6. Following Section 7(c) shall be: (d) (1) In conditions in which an acquirer has a real concern that the merchant’s activity includes customer fraud, customer deception, or use of unfair influence on customers, it is permitted to refuse to provide acquiring services to the company or to carry out a specific transaction for it. The refusal shall be considered a reasonable refusal, among other things regarding the Banking (Service to Customer) Law, 5741- 1981. (2) If the acquirer decided not to provide acquiring services to the merchant or not to carry out a specific transaction for it, it shall send a notice regarding that to the merchant soon afterwards, to the extent that there is nothing preventing that. (e) Without derogating from the generality of the provisions of Subsection (d), it is possible to view, among others, each of the following criteria as a basis for a real concern: (1) A high percentage of chargebacks relative to the merchant’s turnover or relative to the quantity of transactions in a given period of time. In this regard, the customers’ age shall be taken into account, to the extent that the acquirer has such information. (2) A high percentage of customer complaints against the merchant, which based on the acquirer’s experience are liable to indicate fraud, deception, or unfair influence. In this regard, the customers’ age shall be taken into account, to the extent that the acquirer has such information. (3) An activity pattern of numerous repeated attempts to charge the same payment card fixed or varying amounts relative to a specific transaction. (4) An activity pattern of attempts to charge cards of deceased customers. (f) An acquirer shall determine policy and procedures for implementing the provisions of Subsections (d)–(e). (g) In this section, “deception” and “unfair influence”—as defined and as used in Sections 2 and 3, respectively, of the Consumer Protection Law, 5741-1981.
Bank of Israel Banking Supervision Department Bank–Customer Division Regulation (Bank–Customer) Unit 3 Explanation It was determined that an acquirer may refuse to provide acquiring services or to carry out a specific transaction for a merchant when the acquirer has a real concern that the activity includes customer fraud, deception, or use of unfair influence on them. If the acquirer decided to do so, it is required to send notice of that to the merchant soon afterwards, to the extent that there is nothing preventing that (such as a legal impediment or lack of ability to contact the merchant). Examples of criteria listed in the section were formulated based on the experience of the credit card companies, and on the guidelines of the international organizations. Thus, for example, the international organizations’ documents serve as an indicator for the first criterion, a high percentage of chargebacks. The experience of the credit card companies indicates that the third criterion, an activity pattern of numerous attempts to charge the same payment card relative to a specific transaction, is not plausible and is liable to raise the concern that the transaction is not real. The acquirers may establish additional criteria that establish a real concern. The acquirers shall establish policy and procedures for implementing the above. Effective date 7. This amendment shall go into effect up to three months after its publication. File update 8. Attached please find update pages to the Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive file. Following are the update pages: Remove page Insert page (5/16) [1] 472-1-7 (12/18) [2] 472-1-7 Sincerely, Dr. Hedva Ber Supervisor of Banks