2026-04-17
The Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM) published this sector report to detail the operational impact of the Amendment Act on the Audit Sector, which introduces stricter governance rules for the largest audit firms, clarifies their shared responsibility for statutory audit quality, mandates periodic audit quality indicator reporting for OOB firms, creates a fallback appointment mechanism for public interest entities lacking an auditor, and permits reporting of audit deficiencies to the AFM by limiting confidentiality obligations. Expected to enter into force on 1 July 2026, the legislation amends the Audit Firms Supervision Act and the Act on the Audit Profession to systematically elevate sector quality and governance standards. Audit firm policy makers are directed to immediately assess these regulatory changes against their operations and implement necessary compliance measures.
APPENDIX SECTOR REPORT Amendment Act on the Audit Sector: What is the Impact on Your Organization? In brief - The Amendment Act on the Audit Sector is expected to enter into force on 1 July 2026. With this publication – intended for all audit firms – the AFM highlights five topics regulated in this Act that may impact your audit firm. APRIL | 2026
© AFM 2026 | Amendment Act on the Audit Sector: What is the Impact on Your Organization? 2 Summary Through the Amendment Act on the Audit Sector, the Minister of Finance has adopted additional measures to contribute to the quality of statutory audits. The quality of statutory audits forms the basis for trust in the audit and is a prerequisite for trust in the audit sector. The measures support, among other things, a quality-oriented culture within audit firms. As the name of the Amendment Act on the Audit Sector indicates, this is a law that introduces amendments to other laws. The content of this Act must be read in conjunction with the Audit Firms Supervision Act (Wta) for topics 1, 2, and 5 below, and in conjunction with the Act on the Audit Profession (Wab) for topics 3 and 4. This publication brings five topics from the Amendment Act on the Audit Sector to the attention of audit firms and their policy makers. Some topics concern specific groups of audit firms; others impact all audit firms. The AFM urges policy makers of audit firms to familiarize themselves with these topics to assess their impact on their own organization and determine what actions may be necessary.
© AFM 2026 | Amendment Act on the Audit Sector: What is the Impact on Your Organization? 3
© AFM 2026 | Amendment Act on the Audit Sector: What is the Impact on Your Organization? 4 2. Clarification of the audit firm's shared responsibility for the quality of statutory audits For all AO’s, the Act clarifies the shared responsibility of the audit firm for the quality of its individual statutory audits (amendment to Article 18 Wta). The amendment stipulates that the quality management system is designed in such a way that the quality of the statutory audits is secured. This gives the provision on the quality management system a quality objective. This clarification of the shared responsibility of audit firms for the quality of statutory audits reflects a development in the audit profession where the quality of a statutory audit is largely influenced by the audit firm, alongside the individual auditor. This requirement will be further specified in subordinate legislation by imposing requirements on the quality management system to give effect to this shared responsibility. 3. Audit quality indicators for OOB audit firms For OOB-AO’s, a requirement will apply under the Act on the Audit Profession (Wab) to periodically report to the Dutch Institute of Chartered Accountants (NBA) on quality indicators, commonly referred to as audit quality indicators (insertion of Articles 45a-45c Wab). The NBA will subsequently make the reported information public. These are indicators that provide insight into factors influencing the quality of statutory audits. The introduction of quality indicators cannot, on its own, be expected to have a quality-enhancing effect. However, data do contribute to fostering good discussion and enabling informed decision-making by all stakeholders, such as audit clients but also the audit firms themselves. The quality indicators to be reported will be established in subordinate legislation under the Act, namely a ministerial regulation. 4. Appointment authority for public interest entities without an auditor For OOB-AO’s, it is relevant to take note of the future regulation whereby – as an ultimum remedium – an OOB audit firm will be assigned to a public interest entity (OOB) (insertion of Articles 54a-54e Wab). The Minister of Finance has informed the House of Representatives that he wishes to bring this regulation into force only when he is convinced that there is an OOB that has everything in order but has still been unable to contract an audit firm. The regulation gives an OOB that, despite reasonable and timely efforts, cannot find an audit firm willing to accept the assignment for a statutory audit of their financial reporting, the possibility to submit an application to the Dutch Institute of Chartered Accountants (NBA) to be assigned an OOB-AO. The NBA will gain the authority to decide on the request of an OOB for the assignment of an OOB-AO. This regulation does not yet enter into force upon the entry into force of the rest of the Amendment Act, but only at a later moment when the minister decides that a necessity exists for this.
© AFM 2026 | Amendment Act on the Audit Sector: What is the Impact on Your Organization? 5 5. Reporting deficiencies in a statutory audit to the AFM For all AO’s, this Act limits the confidentiality obligation for audit firms (amendment to Article 20 Wta) to enable reporting to the AFM of possible deficiencies in a statutory audit. With this legislative amendment, the obligation of audit firms to keep confidential data or information secret does not apply if they are provided to the AFM in connection with reporting a possible violation of the European Audit Regulation or the Wta, as identified by an audit firm. A possible violation of the Wta may occur, for example, if an audit firm takes over a statutory audit from another audit firm and finds irregularities in the previous audit. The AFM can include the reports in its supervision of audit firms and their external auditors. In this way, these reports can contribute to the sustainable improvement of the quality of statutory audits and thereby increase trust in the audits and the sector. Such a report of deficiencies in a statutory audit can preferably be submitted by email (wta@afm.nl).