2020-12-29 | 241/04The National Bank of Georgia issued this rule to establish the legal framework for applying the bail-in tool to recapitalize failing commercial banks or bridge banks. It defines the scope of eligible liabilities subject to write-down or conversion, explicitly excluding covered deposits, employee payables, and critical operational liabilities, while mandating that shareholders absorb losses first. The regulation further details the determination of Minimum Requirement for Eligible Liabilities, the calculation of conversion rates, and the requirement for banks to submit and implement a post-resolution action plan.
Unofficial translation Decree № 241/04 The Rule on recapitalization of a commercial bank in resolution by means of write-down or conversion of bank’s liabilities Article 1. General Provisions
Purposes of the Resolution” approved by the Decree of the Governor of the National Bank of Georgia №128 / 04 of June 29, 2020. 3. While using bail-in tool for a bank in resolution regime, in the front line of the order should be set liabilities where contractual terms explicitly states bail-inability and conversion into common shares. Article 3. Scope of the bail-in tool
c) Whether it is possible to substitute above mentioned outsourced services by third parties, in reasonable time and efficiently, in accordance with the “Rule for Defining and Evaluating Critical Functions of a Commercial Bank” approved by the President of the National Bank of Georgia №129 / 04 of June 29, 2020. 7. National Bank is authorized, in addition to the liabilities specified in Article 3, consider bail-in partial or full waiver for those liabilities, where one or multiple pre-conditions are met: a) Despite efforts of National Bank, it is impossible to use the bail-in tool within reasonable timeframe; b) It is necessary and proportionate to maintain the critical functions and core business of the Bank in resolution regime, to ensure continuity of the Bank's core operations, services and transactions; c) It is necessary and proportionate to mitigate spreading of financial difficulties to other participants of the financial sector; d) To maintain NCWO principle; 8. Decision on partial or full exclusion of liabilities provided for in article 7 from bail-in list, is made by the Resolution Committee, which secures the following: a) The principle that Creditors take loss after shareholders and there is bail-in order reversely to repayment order defined by liquidation procedure, except cases embedded in Article 3711 of the Law of Georgia on Commercial Banks; b) Bank's loss absorption ability/capacity, if certain liability or liability pool to be excluded from bail-in scope; c) Maintenance of resolution financing sources; d) When using the Bank's bail-in tool for recapitalization, the National Bank shall treat tier II capital instruments that are fully participated at amortized cost, in accordance with the law. Article 4. Minimum requirement for eligible liabilities and equity instruments (MREL)
National Bank is authorized to impose MREL, which is a percentage out of regulatory capital and total liabilities.
In order to be classified as eligible liability the instrument should meet the following criteria: a) Must be issued and fully paid up; b) Should not be a liability to the bank, should not be collateralised or guaranteed by the bank; c) There should not be provided direct or indirect financing by the bank, related to the eligible instrument transaction; d) The maturity of its payment should not be less than one year; e) The obligation should not be originated from a derivative; f) Liability should not be related to the requirement provided for in Article 3712, point 10, sub-point “k” of CBA Law.
In the case provided in subparagraph “d” of paragraph 2 of this Article, if the claim holder has the right to withdraw the instrument before due date, maturity of the instrument should be deemed as the date of first occurrence of that right.
If the instrument is subject to foreign law and jurisdiction, National Bank is authorized to require the bank to certify that in the event of write-down or conversion of the instrument, it will be enforceable under foreign law, subject to the terms of the instrument contract and other relevant matters. In case of confirmation absence on the commitment, such instrument should not be qualified as an eligible liability.
In order to determine MREL, resolution division of National Bank carries out consultations with the banking supervision department and makes decision based on at least the following criteria: a) Selection and combination of resolution tools, including bail-in tool for recapitalization purposes, in order to achieve efficient resolvability; b) Determination of MREL that will be used to write-down or convert liabilities in resolution process, to ensure compliance with Bank's licensing requirements for at least 1 year, the continuation of the bank's activities and the restoration of market confidence to it (including exclusion of non-eligible liabilities); c) Bank size, business model, funding model and risk profile; d) Impact of Bank's severe illiquidity or insolvency on system-wide financial stability;
The requirement imposed under this Article should be met by the Bank on an ongoing basis and individually. Article 5. Determination of MREL volume
National Bank determines threshold of regulatory capital to be supported via bail-in and which is needed: a) To protect the Bank's CET established by legal act or set by the National Bank; b) In the case of a bridge bank - to maintain the capital ratios established by legal act.
In the case provided for in point 1 of this Article, volume of temporary state funding, market confidence recovery and licensing compliance for minimum 1 year should be considered, when defining the minimum capital requirements.
National Bank determines volume of eligible liabilities for bail-in purposes in accordance with the Rule on Valuation of Commercial Bank Assets and Liabilities for the Purposes of the Resolution approved by the President of the National Bank of Georgia №128 / 04 of June 29, 2020.
If the volume of bailed-in liabilities was determined via interim valuation by National Bank (in accordance with the “Resolution on the Valuation of Commercial Bank Assets and Liabilities”), and later, the valuation by an independent valuer found that the amount of written-down and/or converted liabilities exceeds the required amount, then National Bank is authorized to carry out one of the following actions in compliance with the principle set in paragraph 1 of Article 3 of this Rule: a) Partial or full increase in the principal amount of the written-down/cut liabilities up to the amount of the initial principal amount; b) Increase in shares and/or other ownership instruments transferred to the holders of written-down/cut liabilities.
c) MREL determination should be done by National Bank on the basis of updated and detailed information, where possible. Article 6. Treatment to shareholders and other instruments owners while using bail-in tool
Article 7. Treatment to derivatives when using a bail-in tool
for 1 month, after the expiration of which claim holders passes the opportunity to exchange the claim rights into new shares. 3. Upon expiration of the period specified in point 2 of this Article, National Bank secures storage of issued shares and placement of relevant proceeds for a reasonable timeframe, if claim holders (if any) appears with sufficient proof of ownership. Article 10. Action plan by Commercial Bank
Within 1 month after the use of the resolution tool defined by this rule, National Bank is authorized to require the bank to draw up, submit and implement an action plan. The action plan should include long-term improvement measures, based on reasonable assumptions about macro economic environment and financial sector outlook.
In special cases, if necessary for sustainable resolution objectives, National Bank is authorized to extend determined deadline specified in point 1 of this Article, to 2 months.
Administrators of the bank (if any) or special manager introduced by CBA Law are responsible for the development of the action plan.
The action plan should include measures to be taken within a reasonable timeframe, in order sustainably improve bank’s overall performance, considering assumptions of macro economic environment and financial sector outlook.
The action plan must meet at least the following criteria: a) Plan should comprise assessment of challenges and opportunities in financial sector, in terms of particular bank business strategy rethink and planning; b) Plan should assume and analyze system-wide and idiosyncratic scenarios in line with its relevancy; c) Plan should aim to identify key difficulties and impediments of the bank in resolution regime.
Action plan should include at least the following elements: a) Detailed analysis of the factors/eventsthat led to the distress of the bank and grounds that introduced resolution regime; b) Detailed description of measures, necessary to be taken for achieving post resolution stabilization of the bank, in reasonable timeframe; c) Timeline for the execution of the measures described above.
Measures outlined in subparagraph “b” of paragraph 6 of this article should include at least: a) Re-organization of the bank's business; b) Modifications to be made to the Bank's infrastructure, operating processes and systems; c) Measures to be taken to stop the loss-making activity; d) Measures to restructure competitive business; e) Measures for assets and business lines possible disposal;
Within 1 month after submission of the Action Plan, National Bank's supervisory and resolution functions evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of the plan and in case of a positive opinion, notify the bank administrators or the special manager about consent.
If submitted action plan does not meet requirements set in relevant regulatory legal acts, National Bank assigns 2 more weeks to eliminate mismatch or discrepancies, during which the timeframe provided for in paragraph 8 of this Article shall be suspended.
Due to complexity of the issue, National Bank is authorized to extend deadline of action plan finalization for 1 month, following notification to bank administrators or special manager about the matter.
Responsibility for the action plan execution lies upon the bank administrators or appointed special manager. In order to track the process, bank’s management submit monitoring report to National Bank, disclosing progress of the action plan, at least once every 6 (six) months.
National Bank is authorized to require the bank administrators or special manager to amend the action plan if in the view of National Bank, this is necessary step to meet the objective set in point 1 and 5 of this Article. Such amendments should be agreed with National Bank in accordance with the rules established by this Article. Article 11. Consequences of bank recapitalization action via bail-in tool
Decision of application bail-in tool to recapitalize bank in resolution regime enters into force immediately and execution is mandatory for the Bank, bridge Bank and the shareholders and creditors of the Bank and the Bridge Bank.
Bailed-in liabilities or upcoming accruals to bailing liabilities should be canceled without restoration. In case of partial write-down, liabilities remained after bail-in action, stays under existing contractual terms and is subject to amend, if required by National Bank.