Amending RTS on the assessment of appropriateness of risk weights and minimum LGD values

EBA/RTS/2025/08 10/12/2025 Final Report On Draft Regulatory Technical Standards amending Delegated Regu￾lation (EU) 2023/206 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regu￾latory technical standards specifying the types of factors to be con￾sidered for the assessment of the appropriateness of risk weights for exposures secured by immovable property and the conditions to be taken into account for the assessment of the appropriateness of minimum loss given default values for exposures secured by immov￾able property

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 2 Contents 1.Executive Summary 3 2.Background and rationale 4 3.Draft regulatory technical standards 8 4.Accompanying documents 14 4.1Draft cost-benefit analysis 14 4.2Feedback on the public consultation 15

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 3

1. Executive Summary
2. The EBA is mandated under Article 124(11) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, as amended by Regu￾lation (EU) 2024/1623 (the CRR3), to develop, in close cooperation with the ESRB, draft RTS to spec￾ify the types of factors to be considered by national authorities designated in accordance with Ar￾ticle 124(8) of that Regulation in assessing the appropriateness of the preferential risk weights for exposures secured by immovable property under the Standardised Approach of credit risk.
3. The same mandate was included in Regulation (EU) 2019/876 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (the CRR2), which was delivered in October 2021 jointly with the sister mandate under CRR2 Article 164(8) regarding the IRB Approach of credit risk, on the conditions to assess the ap￾propriateness of the minimum LGD values for exposures secured by immovable property. The draft RTS1 encompassing both mandates were subsequently adopted under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2062 .
4. In addressing this mandate, the EBA has undertaken an assessment of the amendments brought by the CRR3 regarding real estate exposures under the Standardised Approach of credit risk. Based on this analysis, the EBA proposes that the types of factors set out in that Delegated Regulation remain unchanged, noting that the scope of CRR3 amendments either relate to exposures outside the remit of Articles 125 and 126, or refer to the recalibration of risk weights, while the RTS remain neutral on the specific level of the risk weights and focuses solely on the factors to be assessed by national authorities.
5. Therefore, the draft RTS put forward for consultation keeps unchanged the factors already specified under Article 1 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 and solely adjusts the legal references to align with the CRR3. Considering that Article 2 of that Delegated Regulation also addresses the con￾ditions to be assessed under CRR Article 164(6), it has been deemed appropriate for the sake of regulatory consistency to also propose an alignment with the CRR3 of the legal references of Article 2 of that Delegated Regulation considering that the amended Article 164 CRR3 no longer sets “min￾imum LGD values” at portfolio level but “LGD input floor values” at the individual exposure level. Next steps
6. Article 124(11) CRR requires the Final Report on the draft RTS to be delivered by 10 January 2026.
7. The draft regulatory technical standards will be submitted to the Commission for endorsement be￾fore being published in the Official Journal of the European Union. 1 EBA RTS 2021 12 EBA Final Report on draft RTS on Articles 124(4) and 164(8) of the CRR.pdf (europa.eu), published in the Official Journal of the European Union Delegated Regulation - 2023/206 - EUR-Lex (europa.eu) OJ L 29, 1.2.2023, p. 1–5 2 Official Journal of the European Union Delegated Regulation - 2023/206 - EUR-Lex (europa.eu) OJ L 29, 1.2.2023, p. 1–5

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 4 2. Background and rationale 2.1 Background 7. National authorities designated in accordance with Article 124(8) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (the CRR) are to assess, at least annually, whether the risk weights for exposures secured by resi￾dential or commercial immovable property located in their Member State, as set out under Articles 125 and 126 of the CRR, are appropriate based on historical losses and forward-looking immovable property developments. The EBA is mandated under Article 124(11) of the CRR to develop, in close cooperation with the ESRB, draft RTS to specify further the types of factors that are to be considered by national designated authorities in their assessment. 8. The same mandate was included under the CRR2. The RTS delivered accordingly described how to compute those historical losses by means of harmonised reporting and specified the factors to be considered when assessing forward-looking elements. 9. Specifically, historical losses were defined with reference to the specific reporting requirements set out under CRR Article 430a and mirrored accordingly in the COREP reporting requirements. Regarding loss expectations, this was defined as the best estimate of losses considering:

• A horizon of at least 1 year, or up to 3 years if so determined by the authority.
• Historical and cyclical real estate characteristics gathered through price evolution and its vol￾atility.
• Structural characteristics of national real estate markets and their financing.
• Supply and demand drivers.
• The riskiness of real estate exposures.
• The expected evolution of real estate prices and their volatility, noting that if there is related uncertainty a margin of prudence is to be applied.
• The expected evolution in meaningful macroeconomic key variables that could affect the sol￾vency of borrowers, including an assessment of related uncertainty.
• The time horizon for developments to materialise.
• National specificities related exclusively to the real estate market and its financing.
• Any other indicator that provides insight into forward-looking developments or supports data quality. 10.Further, the RTS made reference to national authorities having due regard to other macropruden￾tial measures in force that address identified systemic risks, including national measures that refer to limits on loan-to-value/debt-to-income/debt-service-to-income, and other instruments ad￾dressing lending standards. Finally, the RTS noted that factors may relate exclusively to certain

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 5 property segments or specific parts of the territory of a Member State, in which case the use of specific data is allowed other than the harmonised national losses collected in COREP. 11.In terms of retail exposures secured by immovable property and treated under the IRB Approach, the RTS further specified the conditions to be taken into account by national designated authori￾ties when assessing the appropriateness of the minimum LGD values for those exposures. As rele￾vant conditions, the RTS identified:

• Demand and supply conditions of real estate markets.
• Conditions that affect drivers of LGD estimates.
• Other conditions that indirectly affect the value of collateral taken into account in LGD esti￾mates. 12.Additionally, the RTS required designated authorities to also have regard to:
• Whether macroeconomic imbalances are related to an economic downturn and are there￾fore already considered in the downturn LGD estimates for the respective exposures.
• Other macroprudential measures in force that already address the identified systemic risks affecting the adequacy of the LGD minimum values, such as loan-to-value, debt-to-income, or debt-service-to-income limits or other instruments addressing lending standards.
• The degree of uncertainty concerning the evolution and price volatility of immovable prop￾erty markets.
• National specificities exclusively related to the real estate market and its financing.
• Benchmarking comparisons of LGD estimates across institutions or Member States for com￾parable exposures, where relevant and available. 2.2 Rationale 13.The CRR3 has increased the risk sensitivity for exposures secured by immovable property under the Standardised Approach, which raises the question whether these amendments may impact the types of factors to be considered by national authorities in setting up national macropruden￾tial measures related to the relevant real estate risk weights under the Standardised Approach of credit risk. The changes introduced in this regard by the CRR3 are summarised as follows. 14.First, a more conservative risk weight is applied to real estate exposures where repayment is ma￾terially dependent on the cash flows generated by the property securing the exposure (Income￾Producing Real Estate, or IPRE).In the case of IPRE exposures secured by a residential property, such more conservative risk weights however only apply, where none of the conditions pursuant to points (1) to (4) of Article 124(2)(a)(ii) CRR3 is met. This type of riskier IPRE exposures is not eli￾gible for the preferential treatment under CRR Articles 125 or 126. As the specifications on the types of factors included in the existing RTS, which national designated authorities shall consider in their assessment, are deemed relevant and sufficient for both IPRE and non-IPRE exposures, no change to the RTS is proposed related to this amendment of the CRR3.

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 6 15.Second, a dedicated treatment is introduced for land acquisition, development and construction exposures (ADC), which refers to loans to companies or special purpose entities financing any land acquisition for development and construction purposes, or development and construction of any residential property or commercial immovable property. A 150% flat risk weight is assigned to those exposures, unless the exposure meets either of the two conditions for a preferential 100% RW for residential ADC in accordance with Article 126a(2) CRR3 that will be further specified in upcoming EBA Guidelines. This dedicated conservative treatment targets exposures considered riskier, which are backed up by unfinished property and where the institution’s exposure is not towards a natural person but towards the constructor or real estate developer. As this exposure type is not eligible for the preferential risk weight treatment under CRR Articles 125 or 1263 , no change to the RTS is proposed. 16.Third, the loan-splitting approach is retained4 , when relevant safeguards are met, where the se￾cured part of the exposures is recalibrated, as well as the share of the exposure considered as se￾cured. No change to the RTS is proposed, as the RTS refer to the factors to be considered by na￾tional designated authorities in assessing the appropriateness of preferential risk weights, regard￾less of the risk weight calibration. 17.Fourth, the option for a whole-loan approach is introduced, where the driver of the associated risk weight depends on the exposure-to-value (ETV). This approach introduces higher risk sensitiv￾ity in the risk weight calibration, whereby higher ETVs are associated with higher risk weights. As the RTS refer to the factors in assessing the appropriateness of preferential risk weights, regard￾less of the risk weight calibration, no change to the RTS is proposed. 18.Hence the draft RTS proposed for consultation leave unchanged the factors already specified un￾der Article 1 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206, with the proposal to solely adjust the legal references to align with the CRR3. 19.It is recalled that Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 embedded jointly the mandates under CRR2 Articles 124(4) and 164(8), both dealing with the assessments of the appropriateness of in￾put parameters for the determination of own funds requirements for credit risk exposures se￾cured by immovable property. They were delivered in a single RTS to ensure consistency between the two assessments. Although the CRR3 does not include any mandate to produce regulatory technical standards regarding Article 164, it has been deemed appropriate for the sake of regula￾tory consistency to take this opportunity to also propose an alignment with the CRR3 regarding the legal references of Article 2 of that Delegated Regulation, which deal with the national macro￾prudential measures under CRR Article 164. Such alignment is required because Article 164(4) CRR2 referred to “minimum LGD values” at portfolio level for the exposure-weighted average LGD for all retail exposures secured by residential property and for the exposure-weighted average 3 Articles 125 and 126 of the CRR are only applicable to non-ADC exposures, as set out under Article 124(2) of the CRR. Spe￾cifically, ADC exposures are subject to a dedicated treatment specified under the new Article 126a of the CRR. 4 The loan-splitting approach makes a distinction between 1) the secured part of the exposure secured by real estate collat￾eral, which is assigned a 20% risk weight up to certain thresholds of the property value, and 2) the unsecured part, which is assigned the risk weight of the counterparty.

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 7 LGD for all retail exposures secured by commercial immovable property. By contrast, the amended Article 164(4) CRR3 sets “LGD input floor values” applicable at the level of individual re￾tail exposures secured by residential property and at the level of individual other retail exposures secured by residential property or by commercial immovable property. The amended paragraphs 6 and 7 of Article 164 CRR3 also take account of those amendments.

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 8 3. Draft regulatory technical standards amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 9 COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) …/… of XXX amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 of 5 October 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Par￾liament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the types of factors to be considered for the assessment of the appropriateness of risk weights for exposures secured by immovable property and the conditions to be taken into account for the assessment of the appropriateness of minimum loss given default values for expo￾sures secured by immovable property (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Coun￾cil of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions ( 5 ) and amending Reg￾ulation (EU) No 648/2012, and in particular Article 124(11), third subparagraph, thereof, Whereas:

1. Due to the entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 of 31 May 2024 ( 6 ) amend￾ing Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 should be amended to correct references to Article 124 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 that have become obsolete and to reflect the change in terminology in Article 164 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 related to the possibility for an authority designated in accordance with Article 164(5) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 to set ( 5 ) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/575/oj). ( 2 ) Regulation (EU) 2024/1623 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards requirements for credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, operational risk, market risk and the output floor (OJ L, 2024/1623, 19.06.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1623/oj).

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 10 higher LGD input floor values, instead of higher minimum LGD values, for expo￾sures located in one or more parts of the territory of the Member State of that author￾ity. 2. This Regulation is based on the draft regulatory technical standards submitted to the Commission by the EBA. 3. The European Banking Authority has conducted open public consultations on the draft regulatory technical standards on which this Regulation is based, analysed the potential related costs and benefits and requested the advice of the Stakeholder Group established in accordance with Article 37 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7 ), HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 is amended as follows: (1) the title is replaced by the following: ‘Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 of 5 October 2022 supple￾menting Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the types of factors to be considered for the assessment of the appropriateness of risk weights for exposures secured by immovable property and the conditions to be taken into account for the assessment of the appropriateness of the loss given default input floor values for retail exposures secured by immovable property’; (2) Article 1 is amended as follows: (a) in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, the introductory wording is replaced by the following: ‘When assessing the appropriateness of the risk weights referred to in Arti￾cle 124(9), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, the authorities designated in accordance with Article 124(8) of that Regulation shall determine all of the following:’; (3) in paragraph 1, point (a) is replaced by the following: ‘(a) the loss experience as the ratio of the following: (i) in the case of exposures secured by residential property or by mortgages on residential property as referred to in Article 124(9), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, the losses reported in accordance with 7 Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/78/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12–47, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2010/1093/2024-12-30)

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 11 Article 430a(1), point (a), of that Regulation and the exposure value re￾ported in accordance with Article 430a(1), point (c), of that Regulation; (ii) in the case of exposures secured by commercial immovable property or by mortgages on commercial immovable property as referred to in Arti￾cle 124(9), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, the losses reported in accordance with Article 430a(1), point (d), of that Reg￾ulation and the exposure value reported in accordance with Arti￾cle 430a(1), point (f), of that Regulation;’; (c) in paragraph 2, first subparagraph, the introductory wording is replaced by the following: ‘The authorities designated in accordance with Article 124(8) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall determine the loss expectation referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), in either of the following ways:’; (d) in paragraph 2, the last subparagraph is replaced by the following: ‘When determining the loss expectation referred to in paragraph 1, point (b), the authorities shall reflect the forward-looking immovable property market develop￾ments referred to in Article 124(9), first subparagraph, point (b), of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 during a forward-looking horizon of at least one year and, if so determined by that authority, up to three years.’; (e) paragraph 4 is replaced by the following: ‘Where there is a lot of uncertainty as to the factors referred to in paragraph 3, point (e), the authorities designated in accordance with Article 124(8) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall consider a margin of prudence when determining the loss expec￾tation in accordance with paragraph 2 of this Article.’; (f) in paragraph 5, the introductory wording is replaced by the following: ‘For the purposes of paragraph 1, the authorities designated in accordance with Ar￾ticle 124(8) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 shall have regard to other macropru￾dential measures in force that already address the identified systemic risks affecting the appropriateness of the risk weights referred to in Article 124(9), first subpara￾graph, of that Regulation, including the following measures in national law de￾signed to enhance the resilience of the financial system:’. (2) Article 2 is amended as follows: (a) the title is replaced by the following: “Conditions to be taken into account for the assessment of the appropriateness of the LGD input floor values for retail exposures secured by immovable property”; (b) in paragraph 1, the introductory wording is replaced by the following: ‘When assessing the appropriateness of the LGD input floor values in accordance with Ar￾ticle 164(6) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, the authorities designated in accordance with paragraph 5 of that Article shall, when performing the systemic risk assessment on the

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 12 basis of macroeconomic imbalances affecting LGD estimates beyond the economic cycle, have regard to all of the following conditions:’; (c) in paragraph 2, point (b), the introductory wording is replaced by the following: ‘other macroprudential measures in force that already address the identified systemic risks affecting the adequacy of the LGD input floor values, including the following measures in national law designed to enhance the resilience of the financial system:’. (3) Article 3 is replaced by the following: “Article 3 Assessments for property segments or specific parts of the territory of a Mem￾ber State An authority designated in accordance with Article 124(8) or Article 164(5) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 may consider the factors set out in Article 1 of this Regulation, or take into account the conditions set out in Article 2 of this Regula￾tion, for one or more property segments or one or more parts of the territory of a Member State.”. (4) Article 4 is replaced by the following: “Article 4 Use of other sources of data Authorities designated in accordance with Article 124(8) or Article 164(5) of Regu￾lation (EU) No 575/2013 that determine the loss experience in accordance with Ar￾ticle 1(1), point (a), of this Regulation, or that assess the appropriateness of the LGD input floor values in accordance with Article 2 of this Regulation for a prop￾erty segment or a part of the territory of a Member State, may use other sources of data, including national ad-hoc reporting and credit registers relating to that seg￾ment or that part of the territory, provided that the data collected in accordance with Article 430(1), point (a), and Article 430a, of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 are not sufficiently granular.”. Article 2 Entry into force This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 13 Done at Brussels, For the Commission The President

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 14 4. Accompanying documents 4.1 Draft cost-benefit analysis A. Problem identification The EBA is mandated under Article 124(11) of the CRR3 to develop, in close cooperation with the ESRB, draft RTS to specify the types of factors to be considered by national designated authorities in assessing the appropriateness of the preferential risk weights for exposures secured by immov￾able property under the Standardised Approach for credit risk. The same mandate was included under Article 124(4) of CRR2. The RTS delivered accordingly de￾scribed how to compute those historical losses by means of harmonised reporting and specified the factors to be considered when assessing forward-looking elements. B. Policy objectives This mandate aims, such as the previous RTS, at reaching the maximum possible harmonisation as the way of achieving a level playing field, preventing regulatory arbitrage opportunities, and en￾hancing supervisory convergence and legal clarity. The changes introduced in the CRR3 under Article 124 require the updating of relevant CRR3 Arti￾cle references in the RTS to align with the new framework in place. The same applies for the re￾placement of the term ‘minimum LGD values’ by ‘LGD input floor values’ in Article 164 CRR3. C. Baseline scenario The baseline scenario entails maintaining the existing framework (current practice) while adjust￾ing the regulatory reference where necessary, such as to accommodate the revised scope of ap￾plication of the specifications introduced by the RTS delivered under CRR2. These specifications include, among others, the framework to compute historical losses with reference to the specific reporting requirements set out under CRR Article 430a and mirrored accordingly in COREP report￾ing, the loss expectation defined as the best estimate of losses, and the reference to due regard to other macroprudential measures in force that address identified systemic risks. Finally, the RTS note that factors may relate exclusively to certain property segments or specific parts of the terri￾tory of a Member State.

FINAL REPORT ON AMENDING RTS MANDATED UNDER CRR ARTICLE 124(11) 15 D. Options considered In addition to the option of applying changes driven by the updated regulation (i.e. maintaining the existing practice set out in the current framework - option 1), it was also considered the ne￾cessity of implementing targeted amendments based on practical experience with the ITS applica￾tion by competent authorities (i.e. adding or removing specific elements from the existing frame￾work based on practical experience - option 2). Competent authorities considered the current framework as robust, capable of ensuring adequate cooperation among them, without highlight￾ing the need for major amendments. Consequently, it was determined that no amendments be￾yond those reflecting changes in the EU legal framework were necessary (option 1) also consider￾ing the short period over which Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/206 has been appli￾cable. E. Cost-Benefit Analysis Considering the strictly formal nature of the changes proposed by the amending RTS (i.e. updating regulatory references), no additional impact is expected from the implementation of the draft RTS. 4.2 Feedback on the public consultation The consultation period lasted for one month and ended on 30 May 2025. No responses were received. As a result, no changes to the draft RTS have been incorporated.