Amendment to Corporate Governance Direction

# CENTRAL BANK OF SRI LANKA

## FINANCE LEASING ACT DIRECTIONS
**26 June 2020**  
**No. 04 of 2020**

---

## AMENDMENT TO CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DIRECTION

In terms of powers conferred by the Section 34 of the Finance Leasing Act, No.56 of 2000, the Director of the Department of Supervision of Non-bank Financial Institutions issues the following amendments to the Finance Leasing (Corporate Governance) Direction No. 04 of 2009, issued for Specialised Leasing Companies (SLCs) in Sri Lanka.

Having considered the limited ability especially in the presently prevailing, challenging environment, of attracting experienced personnel with impeccable track records to the Board of Directors (BODs) of the non-banking financial institution sector, the Monetary Board considers that it is prudent to provide a degree of continuity in BODs, subject to the qualification that such continuity, from an objective perspective, is in the best interests of the SLCs.

### 1. Applicability and Scope

Notwithstanding the provisions of Direction 5(1) of the Finance Leasing (Corporate Governance) Direction No. 04 of 2009, SLC may, with the prior approval of the Director, Department of Supervision of Non-Bank Financial Institutions (D/SNBFI) and with the concurrence of Monetary Board, permit a Director who is already holding office, and who attains the age of 70 years on or after the date of this Direction comes into effect, to continue in office as director, subject to strict adherence to the following requirements and conditions of this Direction and the accompanying Guidelines.

### 2. Prior Approval of the D/SNBFI

Any extension of the time period, will be subject to the prior approval of the D/SNBFI and with the concurrence of Monetary Board.

### 3. Terms and Conditions

The terms and conditions and the procedure to be followed, are stipulated in the Guidelines annexed to this Direction.

---

## 4. Effective Date and Validity period

The Direction will be effective with immediate effect and the Direction shall be in effect for a period of three years from the date of the said Direction, subject to renewability upon the completion of three year period, at the discretion of the D/SNBFI.

---

**J P Gamalath**  
Director, Department of Supervision  
of Non-Bank Financial Institutions, Central Bank of Sri Lanka

---

## Guideline on Determining the Fitness and Propriety of Directors Beyond the Age of 70 years up to Maximum of 75 years

### 1. Applicability

#### 1.1.
The provisions of this Guideline shall be applicable only in respect of Directors of a SLC who are serving in the said capacity, as at the date of the Direction, and in the event of any such SLC deciding to continue the service of such Directors beyond the age of 70 years, in the future.

### 2. Assessment Criteria

#### 2.1.
The Directors who have reached the age of 70 years, will be assessed by the D/SNBFI, based on the criteria that have been formulated in order to objectively assess fitness and propriety, as well as the contribution made by such Directors to the financial institution and the level of regulatory compliance of such financial institution.

#### 2.2.
If a SLC wishes to continue a Director beyond the age of 70 years, the following documents are required to be submitted in order for the D/SNBFI to evaluate the suitability of approving any extension of the period of service, which will be done by the D/SNBFI with the concurrence of Monetary Board on a case by case basis. However, in no instance will a Director be permitted to function beyond the age of 75 years.

#### 2.3. Fitness and Propriety

The responsibility is with the SLC to establish, to the due satisfaction of the D/SNBFI that the relevant director, whose services are proposed to be retained beyond the age of 70 years, is a fit and proper person, to carry out the duties and functions of a director:

(i) The Affidavit and Declaration as in Annex I and II of the Finance Leasing (Assessment of Fitness and Propriety of all Directors on the Board and Officers Performing Executive Functions) Direction No. 03 of 2012, and as may be amended from time to time. The said affidavit and declaration shall be certified by the Chairman and all members of the Board of Directors holding office at the time, excluding however, the Director being evaluated for this purpose.

(ii) The Board of Directors of the SLC shall adopt a board resolution signed by all the Directors (other than the Director seeking exemption) holding office at the time of such adoption, resolving that they consider the continuation in office of the Director seeking such exemption, will be of benefit to the institution for the reasons stated in such resolution and recommending to the D/SNBFI to consider granting the

---

required exemption. The resolution shall be adopted not more than 6 months prior to the date on which exemption will be required to be effective.

(iii) The reasons set out in such resolution must be sufficiently descriptive and adequate, in order to permit the D/SNBFI to arrive at an informed decision on the matter and must be supported by documentation, as far as possible. In the event of the D/SNBFI requiring any further documentation in support of the request for extension, the relevant SLC shall duly furnish the same to the D/SNBFI.

(iv) An affirmative written assurance addressed to the D/SNBFI, signed jointly by the Chief Compliance Officer, Company Secretary and Chief Executive Officer that the SLC is in compliance with all the other requirements relating to the Composition of the Board and Fitness and Propriety of Directors specified under the applicable Directions.

(v) Certification from the Company Secretary of the relevant SLC, that the continuation of the relevant Directors/s beyond the age of 70 years, has been duly approved by passing a resolution at a general meeting in terms of Section 211 of Companies Act No. 07 of 2007. Such resolution shall be passed, without taking into account and excluding the ownership or equity stake of the Director concerned. Close relatives of the Director concerned and common Directors holding an ownership stake of the SLC concerned shall be omitted from voting on the resolution. Close relatives are defined as per Finance Leasing (Corporate Governance) Direction No. 04 of 2009.

(vi) In respect of each further year on account of which an extension is sought, upto the maximum age of 75, a fresh resolution, as contemplated above, shall be duly passed.

(vii) Written Confirmation from the Company Secretary that the continuation of a Director of an SLC, beyond the age of 70 years, is not prohibited by the Articles of Association of the relevant SLC.

### 2.4. Historical Records/Contribution to the financial institution:

In order to facilitate the due assessment of the performance of the relevant Director, during his/her tenure of office as a Director of the relevant SLC, the following documents shall be submitted by the SLC:

(i) Certified copies of the annual self-assessment undertaken by Directors during the preceding five years, in line with the Section 2(8) of the Finance Leasing (Corporate Governance) Direction No. 04 of 2009, as amended, in the case of Directors for the

---

first year of evaluation beyond 70 years of age and thereafter, annual self-assessment form.

(ii) Self-declaration by an applicant incorporating the improvement of financial performance during the tenure of his service, details of any special assignments, projects carried out under his/her leadership, explaining his/her future plans to increase value of the financial institution, etc.

### 2.5. Regulatory Compliance in the Present Capacity:

In assessing the continuation in office, of a member of the Board of Directors, the level of following regulatory compliance by the relevant SLC, will be evaluated by the D/SNBFI in its final discretion. The level of regulatory compliance with the following Directions and to any other direction or provision that the D/SNBFI may consider as being relevant, based on the reports of assessment of the Off-site Officer, together with the Examiner in-charge of the latest statutory examination and together with any other relevant matters which requires the attention of the D/SNBFI:

(i) Finance Leasing (Corporate Governance) Direction No. 04 of 2009, as amended  
(ii) Finance Leasing (Minimum Core Capital) Direction No. 01 of 2012, as amended  
(iii) Finance Leasing Act (Capital Adequacy Requirements) Direction No. 03 of 2018, as amended  
(iv) Finance Leasing (Liquid Assets) Direction No. 04 of 2012, as amended  
(v) Any other supervisory concerns, which are directly, link to the performance of the applicant.  
(vi) Regulatory and supervisory findings of the latest statutory examination.  
(vii) D/SNBFI, with regard to due compliance and/or the extent of compliance, of the relevant SLC, including but not limited to time bound action plans of the statutory examinations, as well as the failure and/or extent of the failure, if any, on the part of the relevant SLC to duly implement corrective measures that may have been stipulated/imposed, during the period when the Director in question held office in that capacity, in order to decide the extent of the culpability of the Director in question, in respect of the truancy of the SLC, or whether there are adequate mitigatory factors that commend themselves to the D/SNBFI.

---

## 3. Procedure of approval

### 3.1.
The Company Secretary of the SLC shall submit all the documents and assurances required in 2.3 and 2.4 above to D/SNBFI not less than 3 months before the date on which the exemption is first required.

### 3.2.
Upon being satisfied that the documents and assurances received are prima facie in order, the D/SNBFI, shall validate the representations and assurances so provided if warranted, and carry out an assessment of the contribution made by the Director on whose behalf the exemption is sought taking into account the criteria stated above.

### 3.3.
Upon completion of the assessment, and within 30 days of the receipt of the application for exemption, the D/SNBFI shall submit a report to the Monetary Board including points stated in 2.5 above, with his recommendation on the matter of granting the exemption and obtain the concurrence of the Monetary Board. The Monetary Board may thereupon reject the granting of the exemption or approve the exemption that has been sought.

### 3.4.
In the course of its decision, the D/SNBFI may issue the same, subject to any conditions and the D/SNBFI, shall forthwith communicate the decision to the SLC and also emphasise the importance of strict adherence to any conditions, that the D/SNBFI may impose and also communicate that the failure to duly comply with such conditions could lead to the D/SNBFI immediately withdrawing the exemption that has been granted.

## 4. Transitional Provisions

### 4.1.
In the event of a Director holding office as at the date of this Direction, being desirous of seeking the benefit of exemption as provided for herein, but is unable to comply with the time periods set out in 3.1 above, only as a result of his term of office ending on or before 15th September 2020 due to the operation of Direction 5(1) of Direction No. 04 of 2009, such Director and the SLC concerned, may complete the requirements within 45 days from date hereof.

### 4.2.
Such Director of a SLC referred to in 4.1 above, may continue in office as a Director, until the formal decision of the D/SNBFI is communicated with regard to his application and continue thereafter, if the exemption under this Direction is duly granted by the D/SNBFI.

### 4.3.
However, in the event of the D/SNBFI rejecting the request, the Director shall forthwith cease to function as a Director of the SLC and the Board of Directors of the SLC shall be collectively responsible to the D/SNBFI to ensure that the Director in question duly

---

ceases to function and shall also cause a replacement Director to be appointed without delay.

## 5. Annual Evaluation

### 5.1.
All such approvals by D/SNBFI beyond the age of 70 years shall be subject to annual re-evaluation, subject to the reaching of a maximum of 75 years of age. In no case shall a Director be permitted to function in such a capacity, on an extended basis, beyond the maximum possible age of 75 years.

### 5.2.
The persons applying for annual extension shall apply at least prior to 45 days of the lapse of the approval period, with all necessary documents as stated in section 2.3 to 2.4 above. However, SLCs are encouraged to process and submit applications for extension at the very earliest opportunity. This will not preclude the D/SNBFI however, from taking cognizance of any supervening disability that has occurred after the submission of the application, or of any other supervening factual circumstance that renders such Director unfit to function beyond 70 years.

## 6. Conditions

All approvals given by D/SNBFI will be subject but not limited, to following conditions;

### 6.1.
The Director concerned shall have completed a minimum period of 3 continuous years in office, as at the date on which the exemption first becomes necessary.

### 6.2.
The proportion of Directors above the age of 70 on a Board of a SLC at any given time shall be limited to maximum of 1 Director.

### 6.3.
With regard to Non-executive Directors seeking extension, section 4(2) of the Finance Leasing (Corporate Governance) Direction No. 04 of 2009 will be still applicable.

### 6.4.
As stated in Section 5 above, all approvals are subject to annual re-evaluation, and the final decision thereon, will be taken by the D/SNBFI subject to concurrence of the Monetary Board.

### 6.5.
Where the D/SNBFI is satisfied at any time that a person continued beyond age of 70 years is not fit and proper as a Director for continuation, he shall submit a report to the Monetary Board supported by reasons and documentation, whether such person is not fit and proper to be a Director of the SLC at any time during the extended period beyond 70 years of age.

### 6.6.
Every SLC shall strictly and forthwith notify the D/SNBFI of any reasonable suspicion that have arisen or findings made to the effect that any Director is not a fit and proper person to hold office in the respective SLC within fourteen days of it being aware of such suspicion or findings.

………………… End of the document …………………