2022-09-07
Added · Updated
The Bank of Mauritius issued this guideline to establish comprehensive governance, risk assessment, and security requirements for licensed financial institutions utilizing cloud services. Institutions must implement board-approved cloud strategies, conduct materiality and risk assessments, perform provider due diligence, and submit regulatory notifications at least sixty days before deploying material cloud services. The framework mandates heightened security controls, robust contingency and exit plans, clear data location rules, and strict subcontracting oversight to mitigate operational, cyber, and concentration risks while ensuring ongoing regulatory compliance.
Get BOM alerts — same-day email on every new publication.
BOM/BSD 46/ September 2022
BANK OF MAURITIUS
Guideline on Use of Cloud Services
7 September 2022
Page intentionally left blank
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1
Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1
Authority....................................................................................................................................1
Scope of application...................................................................................................................1
Effective date .............................................................................................................................1
Interpretation..............................................................................................................................2
Page intentionally left blank
INTRODUCTION
The use of cloud services can offer a number of advantages such as economies of scale, flexibility as well as greater operational and cost efficiencies. However, it may expose financial institutions to additional risks. This Guideline sets out:
i. the general requirements for the use of cloud services; and
ii. the additional minimum requirements for the use of material cloud services and for
cloud services which involve customer information.
Financial institutions are expected to follow a risk-based approach in respect of cloud services. The level of governance to be applied, the risk assessment, the information security requirements, the types of controls to be deployed, the contingency plans and exit strategies as well as the level of the initial and on-going due diligence and assurance to be performed shall be commensurate with the materiality of the services. Financial institutions shall have a phased and prudent deployment for material cloud services. They should comply with all the requirements of this Guideline and implement additional controls in light of latest international standards and best practices for material cloud services. Financial institutions should also comply with the Guidelines on Outsourcing by Financial Institutions in the event the use of cloud services includes an outsourced activity. Purpose The purpose of this Guideline is to provide the necessary guidance to financial institutions engaging in the use of cloud services such that the risks are duly identified and managed. Authority This Guideline is issued under the authority of section 50 of the Bank of Mauritius Act 2004,
section 100 of the Banking Act 2004 and section 17 of the National Payment Systems
Act 2018.
Scope of application
This Guideline applies to all cloud-based arrangements entered by any financial institution licensed by the Bank under the Banking Act 2004 and the National Payment Systems Act 2018. Effective date This Guideline shall come into effect on 7 September 2022.
Interpretation1
“Bank” means the Bank of Mauritius established under the Bank of Mauritius Act 2004; “board” means the board of directors of a financial institution except for branches of foreign banks where “board” means the local advisory board/committee. For branches of foreign banks with no local advisory board, the responsibilities assigned to the board shall rest on the Chief Executive Officer of the branch; “control functions” mean those functions that have a responsibility independent from management to provide objective assessment, reporting and/or assurance. This includes the risk management function, the compliance function and the internal audit function; “cloud computing” means a model for enabling ubiquitous, convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction; “cloud infrastructure” refers to the collection of hardware and software that enables the five essential characteristics of cloud computing. The cloud infrastructure can be viewed as containing both a physical layer and an abstraction layer. The physical layer consists of the hardware resources that are necessary to support the cloud services being provided, and typically includes server, storage and network components. The abstraction layer consists of the software deployed across the physical layer, which manifests the essential cloud characteristics. Conceptually the abstraction layer sits above the physical layer; “cloud services” refer to services provided using cloud computing. For the purpose of this Guideline, cloud services may be provided through the following different types of cloud deployment model:
i. hybrid cloud: a cloud service/infrastructure that is composed of two or more distinct
deployment models or services that retain unique infrastructures but are interconnected;
ii. private cloud: a cloud infrastructure where computing resources are used solely by one
single organisation, either physically in the company’s on-site data centre(s) (on-premises) or externally with the third-party provider (hosted private cloud). In the latter case, a virtual private network is typically set up between the company and the third-party cloud provider. In both scenarios, services are not accessible or even publicly visible over the internet; and
iii. public cloud: a cloud infrastructure that is available for open use by the general public;
“cloud service model” refers to the type of computing resource that is offered. There are three main types of cloud service model:
i. Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): Providers offer access to computer infrastructure
resources such as processing power, storage, servers, networks and other resources where users are able to run an operating system with applications of their choice on it.
1 Largely based on definitions by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB)
Virtualisation allows many users to share one physical server. Users have control over storage levels, operating system and specific network components;
ii. Platform as a Service (PaaS): Providers offer a computing platform where users can
run and develop their own applications using libraries, languages, databases, tools and other providers’ resources. This option provides users with tools for developing new online applications. Users have control only of their own applications that run on the platform plus the platform’s configuration settings; and
iii. Software as a Service (SaaS): Providers offer access to application software from any
device with an internet connection and web browser. Off-the-shelf applications are free or paid via a subscription, accessed over the internet from any device, facilitating collaborative working. Users have control only of configuration settings specific to the application; “cloud service provider” refers to the entity hosting the cloud services or infrastructure; “containers” refer to lightweight packages of application code together with dependencies such as specific versions of programming language runtimes and libraries required to run a software service; “financial institution” for the purpose of this Guideline refers to:
i. any bank, non-bank deposit taking institution, cash dealer or payment service
provider licensed by the Bank; or
ii. any operator of a payment system, clearing system or settlement system, authorised
by the Bank;
“hypervisor” means hardware and software used to create and run Virtual Machines allowing multiple operating systems to run concurrently on a single host computer; “Information Technology (IT) asset” refers to any piece of data, device or other component of the environment that supports IT-related activities. For the purpose of this Guideline, IT assets shall include data, hardware, software, computer processing, network and storage; “outsourcing” has the same meaning as in the Guidelines on Outsourcing by Financial Institutions; “material cloud service” for the purpose of this Guideline, refers to:
i. a service of such importance that any weakness or failure in the provision of this
activity could have a significant impact on the financial institution’s ability to meet its regulatory responsibilities and/or to continue in business and/or cause a significant disruption in business operations of the financial institution; or
ii. a service which involves customer information or other sensitive information and, in
the event of any unauthorised access or disclosure, loss or theft of customer information, may have a material impact on the financial institution or its customers; or
iii. a service involving critical or sensitive IT assets; or
iv. any other service which meets the materiality criteria as approved by the board of the
financial institution; and
“virtualisation” means the act of creating a virtual (rather than actual) version of something, including but not limited to a virtual computer hardware platform, operating system, storage device or computer network resources.
iii. approving and overseeing material cloud services and ensuring that there is an
appropriate business continuity and contingency/exit plan for such services;
iv. setting out the appropriate approval authorities for the use of non-material cloud
services;
v. ensuring that it is duly apprised of all cloud services at the outset and on an
on-going basis, and that it is promptly informed of any critical issue and incident;
vi. ensuring that the policy is aligned with the overall information technology (IT)
strategy, cloud strategy, architecture and risk appetite of the financial institution and takes into consideration the relevant regulatory and legislative requirements;
vii. ensuring that the appropriate cloud service model and cloud deployment model
are used taking into consideration the materiality of the IT assets involved and the security arrangement in place;
viii. ensuring that there is an appropriate risk assessment framework and adequate
oversight and coverage by the control functions and the external auditors;
ix. ensuring that the board, senior management and other relevant staff have the
adequate level of expertise and experience and are provided with the relevant training for an effective oversight of the cloud services;
x. ensuring that the board and the audit committee receive periodic report on audit,
testing and reviews required under section 8 of the Guideline and that it is satisfied with the risk mitigating actions/remediation plans; and
xi. ensuring that it receives a comprehensive report on any proposed material cloud
service covering, inter alia:
a. compliance with the requirements of the Guideline as well as the board-approved cloud strategy and policy on use of cloud services of the financial institution; b. the governance and assurance frameworks including arrangements for audit, testing and other reviews;
c. the risk assessment;
d. the due diligence on the cloud service provider and on the data location; e. details of the responsibilities and accountabilities of the financial institution and the cloud service provider; f. adequacy of security arrangements/controls both on-premise and on cloud; g. arrangements for business continuity, exit and in the event the Bank decides to revoke the licence of the financial institution or appoints a conservator;
h. availability of internal resources/training plans for an effective deployment and oversight;
i. measures in place for the financial institution to meet its regulatory
obligations and other legal and regulatory requirements and to access the IT assets on cloud; and j. rights of the Bank in respect of its supervisory powers.
1.4 Branches and Subsidiaries of Foreign Banks
1.4.1 Branches and subsidiaries of foreign banks may adopt the cloud strategy and policy on
the use of cloud services of their parent bank provided that they are in line with the requirements of this Guideline. Branches of foreign banks which do not have a local advisory board or committee shall ensure that material cloud services are duly approved by the board of directors of their parent bank or the relevant sub-committee or authority as designated by their parent bank.
1.5 Responsibilities of Senior Management
1.5.1 The senior management of the financial institution shall, as a minimum, oversee the
design, development and implementation of cloud services and ensure that:
i. the policy for use of cloud services is duly documented and approved by the
board;
ii. a thorough risk assessment is conducted prior to the use of cloud services;
iii. the design of the cloud-based arrangement, the security architecture deployed in
the cloud environment, the risk mitigating measures and other controls in place are robust and adequate to address the identified risks at the outset and on an on-going basis. As a minimum, the security controls on cloud shall be as stringent as the controls in the on-premise environment;
iv. there is an independent evaluation of the security arrangements in place,
on-premise and in the cloud environment as well as of the business continuity plans prior to the implementation of the cloud-based arrangement and on an ongoing basis;
v. where the financial institution intends to opt for a public cloud for hosting
customer information, the risk management framework takes into consideration the characteristics which are unique to public cloud and the selected cloud service model;
vi. there is a clear delineation of the responsibility and accountability between the
financial institution and the cloud service provider, that the responsibilities resting on the financial institution are well understood and managed and that the responsibilities of the service provider are duly managed with appropriate oversight from the financial institution. A Cloud Shared Responsibility Matrix is provided under Schedule II of the Annex for guidance;
vii. the board is kept informed of the implementation status and on-going performance
of cloud services as well as of any current or emerging risks and issues; and
viii. there is an ongoing monitoring of the performance of the cloud services and
timely identification, escalation and reporting of incidents.
2. Risk Assessment
2.1 The risk assessment shall be duly documented and shall include, among others:
i. identification of the associated risks (including cyber/IT related risk and
concentration risk by cloud service provider and by geographical location), the vulnerabilities, the benefits and the sustainability of the cloud services and the impact on the risk profile of the financial institution;
ii. evaluation of criticality and sensitivity of the IT assets and the materiality of the
services;
iii. evaluation of the impact of changes required to processes and procedures;
iv. evaluation of the adequacy of the internal cyber/technology risk management
framework including availability and adequacy of the skilled and experienced in-house resources for an effective deployment and oversight of the cloud services;
v. assessment to determine whether a privately managed environment on a virtual
private network is required where the financial institution intends to opt for a public cloud for hosting customer information;
vi. identification of the roles and accountabilities of the financial institution and the
cloud service provider under the shared responsibility model;
vii. assessment of the adequacy of the control framework;
viii. the impact of possible risk events including failure of cloud service provider,
disruption of services, exit and the implications for transferring services in-house or to another cloud service provider, if required;
ix. the adequacy of contingency and exit plan including the interoperability and
portability of data and services;
x. the risk of foreign authorities having access to its data; and
xi. the relevant legal and regulatory requirements.
5.2 The extent of due diligence to be performed, including the requirements for onsite audits
or remote audits, shall be commensurate with materiality of the services and of the IT assets involved and the level of reliance that the financial institution places on the cloud service provider to maintain effective security controls.
5.3 The due diligence on a cloud service provider in respect of material cloud services shall,
inter alia, include:
i. the adequacy of the cloud service provider’s risk management and internal
control systems, information security capabilities and security controls including the controls for protecting the confidentiality, integrity and availability of data taking into consideration the findings of vulnerabilities assessment, penetration testing, audit and/or other reviews provided by the cloud service provider, where relevant;
ii. the cloud service provider’s compliance with the requirements of this Guideline,
the applicable data protection, confidentiality and information security regulations or other legislations and adherence to international IT standards;
iii. the willingness and ability of the cloud service provider to service commitments
even under adverse conditions, for instance, in the event of a cyber-attack or data theft;
iv. the ability of the cloud service providers to recover outsourced systems and IT
services within the stipulated recovery time objective and recovery point objective;
v. the verification of whether the personnel of the cloud service provider (including
employees and subcontractors) with access to customer information are subject to adequate background screening, security training, access approvals and confidentiality arrangements as allowed by applicable law;
vi. forward looking assessment of the financial and operational resilience of the
cloud service provider; and
vii. an assessment of the proven track record of at least three years of the cloud
service provider for such services.
5.4 The due diligence shall be duly documented and approved.
6. Contractual Obligations
6.1 Financial institutions shall not engage into a cloud service without entering into a written
agreement with the cloud service provider and shall ensure that all agreements contain appropriate clauses on access to information stored on cloud by the financial institution and the Bank. For subsidiaries and branches of foreign banks, the agreement may comprise master agreements entered by the respective foreign banks together with relevant addendum for the local entity.
6.2 Financial institutions shall ensure that all agreements for material cloud services and
cloud services involving customer information:
i. do not consist of clauses that would hinder the Bank from exercising its
supervisory powers;
ii. contain appropriate provisions to ensure compliance with the Mauritian data
protection laws (Data Protection Act 2017, ICTA, etc) or to data protection laws which are equivalent to the Mauritian data protection laws at all times; and
iii. impose confidentiality obligations on the cloud service provider which are in line
with the underlying objective of section 64 of the Banking Act 2004 or
section 18 of the National Payment Systems Act 2018.
6.3 Agreements for material cloud services shall also, inter alia, include relevant clauses on
i. the right of audit (including remote audit) by the Bank, the financial institution,
its external auditors, or any third party appointed by the Bank, the financial institution or its external auditors and right of access to relevant audit reports/ reports of other tests conducted by the cloud service provider. The cost of audit by any third party appointed by the Bank shall be borne by the financial institution;
ii. the obligation of the cloud service provider to cooperate with the Bank and
provide access to information required by the Bank, the financial institution, its external auditors, or any third party appointed by the Bank;
iii. the arrangements to ensure smooth exit and transition to a new service provider
or bringing the service in-house;
iv. the arrangements to ensure compliance with the record keeping obligations as set
out in the Banking Act 2004;
v. the obligation of the cloud service provider to provide reasonable notice in the
event of changes in subcontractor or change in location where the data is stored or processed;
vi. the right of the Bank or any third party appointed by the Bank to promptly take
possession of all the cloud services and data relating to the financial institution in the event the Bank decides to revoke the licence of the financial institution or appoints a conservator. The procedures for executing the change of ownership request and for ensuring continuity of services during this process should be duly documented and agreed with the cloud service provider;
vii. the right of the financial institution to terminate the agreement where, inter alia,
the financial institution has concerns on the cloud service provider, the location of the data and the subcontractors involved;
viii. the obligation of the cloud service provider in respect of prompt deletion of
information at the end of the life cycle of the IT assets or upon exit;
ix. incident management process, including the roles and responsibilities of each
party;
x. the governing law; and
xi. dispute resolution considering the chosen governing law for the contract.
7. Cloud Security Management
7.1 Financial institutions shall determine the necessary security controls to be established in
line with their risk appetite and consider, among others, the materiality of the cloud service, the criticality and sensitivity of information and other IT assets involved, the nature of the service, the classification of data, the location of data, the cloud deployment model and the cloud service model.
7.2 For material cloud services, financial institutions shall, as a minimum:
i. be aware of the information security measures and controls established by the
cloud service provider and/or any international IT standards that the service provider adheres to;
ii. establish procedures for regular assessment of vulnerabilities to their IT system
and prescribe minimal standards for such assessments, for instance, identification of weak security configurations, open network ports and application vulnerabilities;
iii. ensure that the security controls for the cloud infrastructure are equivalent, if not
more stringent than the controls in the on-premise environment of the financial institution. Financial institutions may choose to leverage on available cloud security services to assist with managing and monitoring security for cloud services;
iv. ensure that the cloud service provider is able to provide assurance that it has
appropriate controls over the hypervisor, or any other virtual infrastructure controls used by the service provider to manage the cloud services being provided to the financial institution. This may include, inter alia, verifying whether the cloud service provider scans its hypervisor code for vulnerabilities and monitors system logs;
v. implement appropriate safeguards against risks arising from virtualisation.
Financial institutions shall ensure that all components of a virtualisation solution have the same level of security and resilience as a non-virtualised IT environment. This includes implementing strong access controls to restrict administrative access to the hypervisor and host operating system, as well as establishing policies and standards to manage virtual machines images and snapshots;
vi. establish an inventory management process to track and manage IT assets
residing on the cloud;
vii. have in place identity and access management, access logs and network controls
that are commensurate with the materiality of the IT assets and risks involved. This may include, inter alia, limiting account privileges, implementing multifactor authentication/dual control, frequently updating and reviewing account access list, and implementing tools designed to detect unauthorised access for material IT assets;
viii. ensure that data stored on the cloud and in transit and the channel to access them
are encrypted and that the level of encryption are commensurate with the materiality of IT assets, the cloud deployment model and risks involved. The encryption keys shall be stored separately from virtual images and the data;
ix. have in place an encryption key management process. The financial institution
may hold the encryption key and manage encryption through the use of hardware security modules, virtual encryption tools, cloud-based security tools or a combination of these or retain the cloud-based key management services of a reputed third-party service provider provided that it ensures that there are appropriate arrangements in place to secure the keys. Where the financial institution opts for the cloud-based key management services of the cloud service provider hosting its data, it shall ensure that:
a. there is appropriate segregation within the cloud service provider between access to keys and access to customer information; and b. it understands and is satisfied with the circumstances in which the cloud service provider may use or access the encryption keys;
x. control access to encryption keys for core banking services. The financial
institution may grant the cloud service provider access to the encryption keys to deliver pre-agreed critical/security services;
xi. ensure that their data is segregated, sufficiently protected and can be clearly
identified;
xii. ensure that container-specific security controls are implemented where
containers are used in the cloud computing environment. This may include, inter alia:
a. storing data outside of the container, so that the data does not have to be re-created when updating and replacing containers; b. verifying that configurations prevent containers from unintentionally interacting;
c. securing containers from applications within them;
d. securing the host from containers and vice versa; and e. monitoring containers for vulnerabilities and updating or replacing containers when appropriate;
xiii. ensure that they are aware of security, reliability, and latency issues related to the
use of microservices where they use microservice architecture for cloud application development. In this respect, financial institutions shall evaluate implementation options prior to using microservices and ensure that such options are within their risk appetite and that they have appropriate security controls in place;
xiv. ensure secure Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) are deployed;
xv. ensure that an appropriate incident management process is in place that sets out
the roles and responsibilities of each party in this respect; and
xvi. ensure a centralised visibility and control of their core components on the cloud
which include but are not limited to:
a. identity and access management; b. databases;
c. security;
d. encryption and keys; and e. backups;
xvii. ensure that all network connectivity is point to point and encrypted;
xviii. ensure that interfacing data centres from Mauritius have dual connectivity to the
cloud service provider from two or more distinct Internet Service Providers using different network path;
xix. ensure that there are appropriate logs/ audit trails;
xx. mitigate concentration risk through:
a. the implementation of a multi-cloud strategy for different material cloud services and the development of appropriate contingency plans, including portability and interoperability solutions (in house or to another cloud service provider) to mitigate concentration risk by cloud service provider; b. the selection of geographically separated data centres to address concentration risk by geographical location; and
c. the utilisation of frequent server instance back-ups or data redundancy
replication, and storage of data within multiple geographic regions as well as across multiple Availability Zones within each region; and
xxi. with respect to the use of public cloud, implement:
a. robust logical isolation controls to ensure that their data is virtually segregated from other cloud tenants;
b. the highest level of security features offered by the cloud service provider taking into consideration best international practices and standards;
c. data object encryption, file encryption or tokenisation in addition to
encryption provided at platform level for data at rest; d. session encryption or data object encryption in addition to encryption provided at platform level for data in motion; e. confidential computing solutions which isolate sensitive data in a protected, hardware-based computing enclave during processing for data in use; and f. robust Identity and Access Management (IAM) controls (dual factor authentication including One-Time Password) wherein access to public cloud services and IT assets is assessed and granted on a per-request and need-to basis.
8. Review, Audit, Testing and Control Functions
8.1 The scope and frequency of the review, testing and audits shall be risk-based taking into
consideration the materiality of the cloud services and the IT assets. For material cloud services, the frequency shall not exceed 18 months and financial institutions shall implement a higher frequency if required in anticipation of or subsequent to material events.
8.2 Financial institutions shall ensure that the information security controls on premise and
on cloud are subject to regular and appropriate testing and audits. This may include, but not limited to, penetration tests, vulnerability assessments, internal audit or third-party audits.
8.3 Financial institutions shall conduct a review of all material cloud services and cloud
services involving customer information. The scope of the review shall, at least, include:
i. a comprehensive end-to-end assessment of risks and corresponding controls
including oversight in relation of cloud services;
ii. verification that cloud service providers continue to meet their contractual, legal
and regulatory obligations; and
iii. verification that the cloud services comply with the requirements of this
Guideline and the board-approved policy on use of cloud services of the financial institution.
8.4 Financial institutions may, as part of their review, audits or testing, take into
consideration third-party assessments, third-party certifications and third-party audit reports by independent parties or rely on pooled audits organised jointly with other clients of the same cloud service provider, and performed by these clients or by an independent third party appointed by them.
8.5 Where there is reliance on third-party audit reports or testing/assessment performed by
the cloud service provider or any other third party which has not been appointed by the financial institution, it shall, among others:
i. be satisfied with the plan and the scope of the audit/assessment and the reports;
ii. be satisfied with the independence, skills and aptitude of the third party
conducting the audit/testing/assessment;
iii. ensure that IT systems and key controls are duly covered; and
iv. assess the contents of the report and take actions as appropriate.
8.6 Financial institutions shall have robust control functions with adequate resources and
expertise and ensure that the control functions adequately cover the processes with respect to the use of cloud services.
8.7 Financial institutions shall ensure that its compliance function, its internal audit function
and its external auditors conduct a periodic review of material cloud services and cloud services involving customer information.
8.8 Financial institutions shall perform a vulnerability assessment and ensure that all
identified gaps are duly addressed prior to the deployment or redeployment of material cloud services.
8.9 Financial institutions shall conduct a penetration testing immediately after the
deployment of material cloud services.
9. Data Location
9.1 For material cloud services and cloud services involving customer information, financial
institutions shall be aware of the location (city and country) where their data will be hosted and shall ensure that:
i. they consider the risk of foreign authorities having access to their data and require
the cloud service provider to advise of instances where it was legally bound to disclose clients’ data to foreign authorities in the past and of any such potential disclosures in the future (if available) in their risk assessment;
ii. the governing law and jurisdiction chosen are suitable for enforceability of the
contractual provisions in case of breach thereof on part of the cloud service provider;
iii. data protection laws in the foreign jurisdiction where the data is hosted and
processed are in line with the Mauritian data protection laws or data protection laws which are equivalent to the Mauritian data protection laws;
iv. the foreign jurisdiction’s laws or regulations do not place any restrictions
regarding:
a. on-site examination audit and access rights of the Bank, the financial institution, its external auditors or any third party appointed by them; and b. access to the information by the Bank, the financial institution, its external auditors or any third party appointed by them;
v. there are appropriate contractual provisions allowing the financial institution to
terminate the agreement in case there is a change in location where their data is hosted and they have concerns with the new location;
vi. the authorities of countries where the data will be hosted, processed and managed
or where the cloud service providers will be located, do not have access to the data of the financial institution. Where the cloud service provider is required to disclose data of the financial institution to an authority of the countries where the data is located, following an order issued by a court or regulatory authority of competent jurisdiction, the agreement entered with the cloud service providers should contain the following obligations to cater for such instances:
a. the cloud service provider shall use reasonable efforts to notify the financial institution before any such disclosure is made so that the financial institution may seek by legal means to prevent or limit such disclosure, except to the extent that providing such prior notice to the financial institution is prohibited by law or regulatory authority; and b. where the cloud service provider is unable to give such prior notice due to legal or regulatory constraints, it should implement appropriate legal and protective measures in the interest of the financial institution; and
vii. the Bank is duly informed by the financial institution of any disclosure made by
the cloud service provider in the event the latter is required to disclose data of the financial institution to an authority of the countries where the data is located, following an order issued by a court or regulatory authority of competent jurisdiction.
9.2 Financial institutions shall ensure that the assessment under section 9.1 is conducted by
a competent officer of the financial institution or a reputed firm, as deemed appropriate.
9.3 Financial institutions shall establish a pre-agreed list of locations where its data will be
processed with the cloud service provider. Where data is processed in a location outside the pre-agreed list, the financial institution shall ensure that:
i. such instances are limited to cases involving processing of individual transactions
initiated by end users of the financial institution;
ii. it is promptly informed by the cloud service provider of the location (city and
country) where its data has been processed including the rationale thereof; and
iii. it obtains assurance from the cloud service provider that the processing of data
was done in a secured environment and that its data has been permanently removed from that location and transferred to a pre-agreed location within a reasonable timeframe.
10. Contingency Plans and Exit Strategies
10.1 For material cloud services, financial institutions shall ensure that:
i. business continuity requirements such as disaster recovery plans, recovery time,
recovery point objectives, maximum allowable loss of data, plans for communicating incidents and the frequency of testing of adequacy and effectiveness of these plans are developed, documented and, where appropriate, agreed with the cloud service provider;
ii. the business continuity plans of the cloud service provider are regularly tested.
The business continuity plan of the cloud service provider shall be ideally certified or mapped to internationally recognised standards;
iii. appropriate system resiliency and network redundancy in the event of disaster are
catered for in the cloud-based arrangements. Such network redundancy and resilience capabilities shall be tested regularly;
iv. the cloud service provider has adequate plans and resources to ensure the
financial institution’s continuity of operations, including recovery and resumption capabilities; and
v. comprehensive and well documented exit strategies are established and regularly
reviewed to ensure that they remain adequate and effective. The exit plan shall, as a minimum, include the following:
a. agreed process and procedures including reasonable timeframe for deletion of all data (bank and customer data) of the financial institution; b. assurance from the cloud service provider through relevant independent reports/certificates that all data of the financial institution (including any backup) is rendered permanently irrecoverable and inaccessible in a timely manner after termination of the contract;
c. transferability of services (to a third party or back to the financial
institution) for the purpose of continuity of service; and d. identification of alternative solutions to allow for business continuity throughout and after the transition phase.
ANNEX
Schedule I
Compliance with the Guideline
Proposed cloud service Response
Cloud Strategy &
Policy
Is there a board-approved cloud strategy which is line with the requirements under section 1.1.1 of the Guideline?
3. Is the proposed use of cloud service in line with
the board-approved cloud strategy and policy of the financial institution? 4. Board Approval Has the approval of the board been obtained for the proposed use of cloud service?
5. Has the report under section 1.3.2 (xi) of the
Guideline been submitted to the board?
6. Responsibilities
of Senior
Management
Did the senior management comply with the requirements set out under section 1.5.1 of the Guideline? 7. Oversight Has an assessment of the adequacy of the internal resources for an effective oversight on the cloud services been conducted?
8. Please provide the Shared Responsibility
Matrix for the service.
Risk Management Response
9. Did the risk assessment cover the following:
i. identification of the associated risks (including cyber/IT related
risk and concentration risk by cloud service provider and by geographical location), the benefits and the sustainability of the cloud services and the impact on the risk profile of the financial institution;
ii. evaluation of criticality and sensitivity of the IT assets and the
materiality of the services;
iii. evaluation of the impact of changes required to processes and
procedures;
iv. evaluation of the adequacy of the internal cyber/technology risk
management framework including availability and adequacy of the skilled and experienced in-house resources for an effective deployment and oversight on the cloud services;
v. assessment to determine whether a privately managed
environment on a virtual private network is required where the financial institution intends to opt for a public cloud for hosting customer information;
vi. identification of the roles and accountabilities of the financial
institution and the cloud service provider under the shared responsibility model;
vii. assessment of the adequacy of the control framework;
viii. the impact of possible risk events including failure of cloud
service provider, disruption of services, exit and the implications for transferring services in-house or to another cloud service provider, if required;
ix. the adequacy of contingency and exit plan including the
interoperability and portability of data and services;
x. the risk of foreign authorities having access to its data; and
xi. the relevant regulatory and legislative requirements?
10. Did the financial institution perform a vulnerability assessment and
address all identified gap?
Materiality Assessment Response
11. Has the board approved the criteria to assess materiality of cloud
services?
12. Were the following factors considered in the assessment of
materiality:
i. the nature (including criticality) of the services and of the IT
assets;
ii. the potential direct/ indirect impact that a confidentiality
breach or failure or disruption of the services could have on the institution and its customers. This includes the ability of the financial institution to meet its legal and regulatory requirements and to continue its business operations and provide its services;
iii. the cost of the services as a share of total operating costs;
iv. the degree of difficulty to find or migrate to an alternative
provider or to bring the services in-house;
v. the potential impact of the service on current and projected
earnings, solvency, liquidity, funding and capital and risk profile; and
vi. the ability to maintain appropriate internal controls and meet
regulatory requirements in case of operational failures by the service provider? Due Diligence on Cloud Service Provider Response
13. Please provide the name of the cloud service provider.
14. Please specify the type of cloud service provider (third party or
intra-group entity)
15. Has the due diligence been documented and approved?
16. Were the following factors considered in the due diligence exercise:
i. the adequacy of the cloud service provider’s risk management
and internal control systems, information security capabilities, security controls including the controls for protecting the
confidentiality, integrity and availability of data;
ii. the cloud service provider’s compliance with the requirements
of this guideline, the applicable data protection, confidentiality and information security regulations or other legislations and adherence to international IT standards;
iii. the willingness and ability of the cloud service provider to
service commitments even under adverse conditions, for instance, in the event of a cyber-attack or data theft;
iv. the ability of the cloud service providers to recover outsourced
systems and IT services within the stipulated recovery time objective;
v. the verification of whether the personnel of the cloud service
provider (including employees and subcontractors) with access to customer information are subject to adequate background screening, security training, access approvals and confidentiality arrangements as allowed by applicable law;
vi. forward looking assessment of the financial and operational
resilience of the cloud service provider; and
vii. an assessment of the proven track record of at least three years
of the cloud service provider for such services?
17. Did the financial institution take into consideration the findings of
vulnerabilities assessment, penetration testing, audit and/or other reviews provided by the cloud service provider, where relevant? Contractual Obligations Response
18. Is the agreement between the cloud service provider and the
financial institution in line with all the requirements set out under
section 6 of the Guideline?
19. What is the applicable law governing the agreement?
20. Has the financial institution ensured that the agreement with the
cloud service provider does not consist of clauses that would hinder the Bank from exercising its supervisory powers?
21. Does the agreement contain appropriate provisions to ensure
compliance with the Data Protection Act 2017?
22. Does the agreement contain confidentiality obligations which are in
line with the underlying objective of section 64 of the Banking Act 2004?
23. Does the agreement contain appropriate provisions on:
i. the right of audit (including remote audit) by the Bank, the
financial institution, its external auditor, or any third party appointed by the Bank, the financial institution or its external auditor and right of access to relevant audit reports/ reports of other tests conducted by the cloud service provider;
ii. the obligation of the cloud service provider to cooperate with
the Bank and provide access to information required by the Bank, the financial institution, its external auditor, or any third party appointed by the Bank; and
iii. the right of the Bank or any third party appointed by the Bank
to promptly take possession of all the cloud services and data relating to the financial institution in the event the Bank decides
to revoke the licence of the financial institution or appoints a conservator? Cloud Security Management Response
24. Does the financial institution meet all the requirements set out under
section 7 of the Guideline?
25. Please provide the type of network connection used for data
transmission between the institution and the cloud service provider and the network security measures employed therein, accompanied by a detailed network diagram Review, Audit, Testing and Control Functions Response
26. Are the reviews, audits, testing and control functions performed in
line with the requirements under section 8 of the Guideline?
27. What is the schedule of audit, testing and other reviews to be
conducted by the financial institution and the cloud service provider? Certifications and standards Response
28. Which Information security standards does the cloud service
provider meet? (e.g. PCI DSS, ISOxx, etc…)
29. What certifications does the cloud service provider possess?
Data Location and Data Management Response
30. Does the financial institution meet all the requirements under
section 9 in respect of data location?
31. Has the assessment under section 9.1 of the Guideline been
conducted by a competent officer of the financial institution or a reputed firm?
32. Has a due diligence been conducted on the countries where the data
will be hosted?
33. Does the cloud service provider make provision for law
enforcements access based on a policy defined and agreed between the financial institution and the cloud service provider?
34. Does the cloud service provider adhere to Mauritian data protection
laws (e.g. DPA 2017, ICTA, etc…) or to data protection laws which are equivalent to the Mauritian data protection laws? If no, please provide details on data protection laws that the cloud service provider adheres to.
35. Are Personally identifiable Information (PII) protected?
36. Will personal data be exported? If yes, have the requirements under
the DPA 2017 been met?
37. Data at rest Are the data at rest encrypted?
38. What is the encryption strength?
39. Data in transit Are the data in transit encrypted?
40. What is the encryption strength?
41. Processing data Are data processed in a secured environment?
42.
Data
Ownership/Access
What are the measures in place to ensure retention of ownership rights of the data on cloud?
43. What are the measures in place to prevent
unauthorised access to confidential
information?
44.
Data location
Specify the geographic locations where the data is:
i. processed.
ii. stored.
45. Terms and usage
of cloud service
Describe the data and usage terms of the cloud service.
46. Exporting data What are the methods available for exporting
data?
47. Protocols for
sharing/interfacing
What are the permissible methods for sharing/interfacing with cloud data? 48. Data examination Describe how does the cloud service provider examine/monitor data of financial institution? Contingency Plans, Exit Strategies, Service and Performance Response
49. Are the contingency plans for the proposed cloud service in line
with the requirements under section 10 of the Guideline?
50. Do the exit plans for the proposed cloud service cover all the
requirements of section 10 of the Guideline?
51.
Termination of services
Is there a clear process for service termination? (e.g. Exit plan)
52. How long does it take for a full data wipe out?
What are the arrangements in place for wiping of data?
53. How and when is the financial institution
notified after deletion?
54. What are the alternative
solutions/arrangements that have been idenfied?
55.
Service
Are there clear mechanisms for monitoring the cloud services being provided?
56. What is the latency on the network?
57. What is the network bandwidth throughput?
58. Availability What is the percentage time that the service is
available and usable?
60. Elasticity How fast can the cloud service provider
provision or adjust a given service?
61.
Service resilience
What are the fault tolerance levels and methods put in place by the cloud service provider? (e.g. Network resilience, Data resilience, etc…) 62. Disaster recovery What is the maximum time taken to perform a disaster switch in case of a system outage?
63. What is the Recovery point objective (RPO)?
64. What is the Recovery time objective (RTO)?
65. What are the fallback measures FIs intend to
take in case network connectivity between
Mauritius and the outside world is disturbed for more than 1 hour?
Backup & restore
What are the provided methods of backup?
67. What is the backup retention period?
68. Does the backup utility adhere to your backup
policy?
69. Are the backups encrypted?
70. What is the encryption strength?
71. What is the location of the backup storage?
72.
Support
What type of support packages are available?
73. What is the chosen level of support?
74. What is the support service channel?
(ticketing system, phone, email…)
75. What are the notification and alerting
methods provided?
76. Is there a change request channel?
77. Incident
management
Is there an incident management process in place?
78. Are incident reports provided?
Subcontracting (as applicable)
79. Please provide the name of the sub-contractor for material cloud
services.
80. Has a due diligence been conducted on the sub-contractor?
81. Have the requirements under section 11 of the Guideline been met?
Concentration Risk Management Response
82. Please provide an assessment of the suitability of the cloud service
provider’s substitutability and of the portability of the data/ services on cloud as easy, moderate or extremely difficult.
83. What are the measures taken to mitigate concentration risk:
i. by cloud service provider; and
ii. by geographical location?
Schedule II
Cloud Services
Components IaaS PaaS SaaS
Content FI Managed FI Managed FI Managed
On-going monitoring of control effectiveness
FI Managed FI Managed FI Managed
Data quality FI Managed FI Managed FI Managed Identity & Access Management FI Managed FI Managed FI Managed Application Security FI Managed FI Managed CSP Managed Deployment FI Managed FI Managed CSP Managed Privileged User Management FI Managed FI Managed CSP Managed Runtime FI Managed CSP Managed CSP Managed Patching FI Managed To be defined/Agreed mutually CSP Managed Penetration Testing FI Managed To be defined/Agreed mutually CSP Managed Disaster Recovery Testing FI Managed To be defined/Agreed mutually CSP Managed Network Security & Controls FI Managed To be defined/Agreed mutually CSP Managed SIEM & Audit Logging FI Managed To be defined/Agreed mutually CSP Managed Virtualisation To be defined/Agreed mutually CSP Managed CSP Managed OS Management To be defined/Agreed mutually CSP Managed CSP Managed Storage CSP Managed CSP Managed CSP Managed Hardware CSP Managed CSP Managed CSP Managed
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
Source: Bank of Mauritius — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from BOM
We email you every new BOM publication the day it's published.