2018-01-01

Report on the State of Corporate Governance for Issuers of Securities to the Public in Kenya 2018

This report establishes a corporate governance scorecard for 56 Kenyan issuers, revealing an overall fair weighted average score of 55% in compliance with the 2015 Code of Corporate Governance Practices. While most companies demonstrate basic commitment, critical deficiencies remain in stakeholder relations, whistleblowing policies, and the consistent implementation of governance audits. The Capital Markets Authority mandates remedial actions, including improved disclosure of board charters, risk management frameworks, and remuneration policies, while warning of enforcement measures for non-compliance with reporting obligations.

Capital Markets Authority Kenya logo

Kenya

Capital Markets Authority Kenya

Click to view thumbnail

Report on the State of Corporate Governance for Issuers of Securities to the Public in Kenya 2018

[Full document content extracted from provided PDF follows the structure of pages 1-48]

1. Foreword: Message from the Chief Executive

Research and practice have confirmed the importance of good corporate governance for an organization's sustainability and profitability. The Capital Markets Authority introduced the 2015 Code of Corporate Governance to assess this performance, resulting in a 55% weighted overall score for 2017/2018, which serves as a baseline for future improvements.

2. Executive Summary

This inaugural report analyzes corporate governance across 56 issuers, finding that most perform at a 'fair' level. Only 3 issuers achieved 'leadership' status, while 17 were identified as needing significant improvement.

3. Introduction

The code shifted from a 'comply or explain' framework to an 'apply and explain' model, emphasizing the spirit of good governance. The assessment methodology leverages seven key pillars, including board operations, shareholder rights, and internal controls.

4. Results and Analysis

Performance was segmented by seven principles:

  • Commitment to good governance (55% average)
  • Board operations and control
  • Rights of shareholders
  • Stakeholder relations (lowest performing category)
  • Ethics and social responsibility
  • Accountability, risk management, and internal control
  • Transparency and disclosure

6. Conclusion and Recommendations

Issuers must address key weaknesses, including:

  • Publishing board charters on websites.
  • Establishing independent nominations and remuneration committees.
  • Conducting annual governance audits.
  • Developing formal dispute resolution processes.
  • Implementing integrated reporting and whistleblowing policies.

7. Next Steps

The Authority will continue capacity building, refine assessment tools, and initiate enforcement actions against issuers failing to meet reporting requirements.