2021-12-27

Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans

The Supervisor of Banks issued Directive 10 to impose strict limits on housing loans issued by banking corporations in Israel to ensure prudent lending practices. The regulation establishes maximum Loan-to-Value ratios of 75 percent for sole dwellings, 70 percent for replacement dwellings, and 50 percent for investment dwellings, while capping the payment-to-income ratio at 50 percent and the variable rate portion at 66.66 percent. Additionally, the directive mandates a maximum repayment term of 30 years, requires specific documentation for certain loan types, and introduces higher risk weights and capital requirements for leveraged or high-risk housing credit portfolios.

Bank of Israel logo

Israel

Bank of Israel

Click to view thumbnail

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-1 Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Definitions

  1. “Housing loan” as defined in Section 3 of Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive 451, “Procedures for Extending Housing Loans;” “Variable rate housing loan” a housing loan, or a portion thereof, on which the interest rate charged may change during the term of the loan; “Dwelling” as defined in Section 9(c) of the Land Taxation (Betterment and Purchase) Law, 5623-1963 (hereinafter: “the Land Taxation Law”); “Sole dwelling” as defined in Section 9 of the Land Taxation Law, purchased by an individual who is a citizen of Israel; “Replacement dwelling” a dwelling, purchased by an individual who is a citizen of Israel and who owns a dwelling, that would be a sole dwelling were it not for the purchase of the dwelling being purchased, where the borrower undertakes to sell the existing dwelling in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 of the Land Taxation Law; “Reduced price dwelling” a dwelling, purchased at a reduced price in a project through which a discount on land is given, such as “Target Price” or “Buyer’s Price”; “Investment dwelling” a dwelling that is neither a sole dwelling or a replacement dwelling; “Right in land” as defined in Section 1 of the Land Taxation Law; “Loan to value (LTV) ratio” as defined in Section 14 of Reporting to Supervision Department Directive 876, “Report on Housing Credit (monthly),” including the rules specified in said Section; however, measurement of the LTV ratio shall relate to the value of the purchased property only, even if additional or other properties are encumbered for the purpose of the transaction; “Payment to income ratio” as defined in Appendix A of this Directive; “Term to final repayment” as defined in Section 15 of Reporting to Supervision Department Directive 877, “Report on Housing Credit—Interest Rate Information (monthly)”; “Israeli citizen” as defined in Section 16a(a), Paragraphs (1) to (1b), of the Land Taxation Law. Terminologies included in said

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-2 definitions shall be interpreted as defined in the aforementioned Section 16a(a); “Nonresident” any person who is not an Israeli citizen. Limit on LTV ratio 2. A banking corporation shall neither approve nor issue a housing loan that has an LTV ratio exceeding the following: 2.1 Housing loan for the purpose of acquiring a right in land that constitutes a sole dwelling—75 percent; 2.2 Housing loan for the purpose of acquiring a right in land that constitutes a replacement dwelling—70 percent; 2.3 Housing loan for the purpose of acquiring a right in land that constitutes an investment dwelling—50 percent. 3. In order to approve a housing loan intended for the acquisition of a right in land that constitutes a sole dwelling or a replacement dwelling, a banking corporation shall obtain, inter alia, a statement from the applicant for the loan, certified by an attorney, that said applicant meets the requisite terms for the dwelling being a sole dwelling or a replacement dwelling. The issue of said loan shall be conditioned, inter alia, on receipt of a copy of said statement as submitted by the loan applicant to the Tax Authority in accordance with Section 73(c) of the Land Taxation Law. Alternatively, a “purchase tax assessment notice,” produced by the Israel Tax Authority, may be used, provided the bank is able to distinguish, on the basis of the contents of the valuation, between a sole dwelling and a replacement dwelling. The banking corporation shall retain documentation of said documents. 4. A banking corporation shall not approve a housing loan such that its total LTV ratio, together with the balance of previous loans issued on the basis of the same dwelling as collateral, exceeds the ratios specified above. In determining the overall LTV, the banking corporation shall include all risk characteristics of the customer and of the transaction. Loans for a reduced price dwelling 4a. The calculation of the value of a property for a loan for a reduced price dwelling shall be made in accordance with the following rules: (1) A banking corporation is permitted to base the value of the property on the evaluation of a property assessor at the time the loan is approved. The assessor’s evaluation must take into account all of the relevant parameters for a dwelling in projects of this type, including: reference to the type and character of the project,

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-3 target population, technical specifications of the dwelling, number of new dwellings sold in the area at a reduced price, and so forth. (2) In a case where the assessor’s evaluation exceeds NIS 1.8 million, the value of the property must be based on NIS 1.8 million or on the purchase price, whichever is higher. (3) The methods of evaluation for calculating the value of the property as stated above (purchase price or assessor’s evaluation) are based on the assumption that there is no legal impediment to realizing the dwelling in case of failure, on the open market without limitation. Should such an assumption not be borne out, this will be reflected in the assessor’s evaluation. To remove doubt, the recording of a cautionary note the equalivaent of a fine to be set by the State shall not be considered a legal impediment on condition that priority is goven to the bank loan over the fine component. (4) Where the program includes fines for breach of the terms of the program, such as a demand to return benefit amounts received by the purchaser, or an agreed￾upon fine, these amounts are to be deducted from the value of the dwelling, unless the bank holds rights that supersede the rights of the State to the return of the benefit or fine upon realization of the property. It is clarified that the purchasers must pay at least the following amounts from their own funds: (a) NIS 60,000 for the purchase of a home in respect of which a grant was provided, in accordance with Appendix A of the Accountant General’s circular, “Assistance in purchasing a home within the framework of the ‘Buyer’s Price—New Format’ program”, as shall be updated from time to time by the Ministry of Construction and Housing and the Accountant General. (b) NIS 100,000 for the purchase of another home. Limit on payment to income ratio 5. A banking corporation shall neither approve nor issue a housing loan in which the payment to income ratio will exceed 50 percent. 6. However, and irrespective of the reduced risk weights set forth in Section 72 of Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive 203, in any case where the payment to income ratio exceeds 40 percent, the loan shall be assigned a risk weight of 100 percent. Limits on variable rate portion of loan 7. A banking corporation shall approve and issue a housing loan only on condition that the ratio of the variable rate portion of the housing loan to the toal loan does not exceed 66.66 percent.

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-4 Limit on repayment term 8. A banking corporation shall neither approve nor issue a housing loan that has a term to final repayment in excess of 30 years. Implementation of limits on rollover of loans 9. A banking corporation shall neither approve nor issue the rollover of a housing loan if, as a result of said rollover, one of the limits specified above is breached or if an overrun that exists before the rollover is increased. For this purpose, “rollover” includes the issue of a housing loan for the purpose of paying back an existing housing loan (even if the paid-back loan was issued by another banking corporation), all of which in a sum that does not exceed the sum of the paid-back loan. Applicability 10. The LTV ratio limit shall not apply to a housing loan of which more than 50 percent is given from funds belonging to and under the responsibility of the State (servicing of loans by the bank). The other limitations shall not apply to housing loans issued entirely from State funds and under the responsibility of the State (servicing of loans by the bank). 11. The limits set forth in Sections 5 and 6 supra (limits on payment to income ratio) shall not apply to housing loans specified in Sections 12.1 and 12.2 below. 12. A banking corporation is entitled not to apply the limits set forth in Section 7 supra (limits on variable rate portion of loan) to the housing loans specified below if the ratio of total variable rate housing loans to total housing loans approved in principle during any calendar quarter does not exceed 66.66 percent (in accordance wwith Section 7 above): 12.1 Bridge loans that have an original repayment term of up to three years; 12.2 Loans for any purpose in a sum of up to NIS 120,000; 12.3 Housing loans in or indexed to foreign currency that are issued to a nonresident. 13. The limits set forth in this Directive shall not apply to housing loans issued by a banking corporation in accordance with agreements that it signed with representatives of the government, employees of the state, teaching workers, and eligible members of the defense establishment1 in a sum that does not exceed NIS 50,000. If there is a guarantee from the Ministry of Defense for housing loans issued by a banking corporation to eligible members of the defense establishment, and the bank holds a legal opinion confirming the posting of the guarantee under all conditions of fitness for recognition of the credit risk mitigation as stated in Directive 1 Employees and pensioners of the Ministry of Defense (and its auxiliary units), civilian employees of the Israel Defense Forces, career IDF personnel and pensioners, IDF retirees, eligible members of the rehabilitation services for persons with disabilities, and eligible members of the Families and Commemoration Division.

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-5 203, the limits set forth in this Directive shall also not apply to loans as state even if they are for higher amounts. Higher risk weight on leveraged variable rate loans 14. In accordance with the Supervisor’s letter concerning “Leveraged variable rate housing loans”, of October 28, 2010 (10LM0781, attached herewith as Appendix B), certain loans specified therein that were issued up to December 31, 2012, were risk-weighted at 100 percent. The banking corporations are permitted to lower the risk weight of these loans to 75 percent. Additional capital requirements on outstanding housing loans 14a. For the purpose of calculating capital requirements as stated in Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive 201, the banking corporation must increase the Tier1 Capital target by a rate that reflects 1 percent of the balance of housing loans that are for the goal of financing rights to property. Collective allowance for credit loss on account of housing loans 15. In accordance with the directives and instructions of the Supervisor of Banks, banking corporations shall review and, where necessary, update the methods that they use to determine the allowance for credit loss allowance on account of housing loans. Banking corporations shall ensure the methods they implement take into account all of the factors that affect the likelihood of collecting these loans. Appendix C (attached) provides examples of factors that may be relevant to the likelihood of collecting housing loans. 16. Transition provision 16. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 14a above, the requirement to increase the capital target in respect of a “loan for any purpose” that was extended in the past shall remain in place even in a refinancing. Updates Circular 06 no. Version Details Date 2426 1 Original directive July 15, 2014 2430 2 Revision Sept. 28, 2014 2455 3 Revision Jan. 25, 2015 2499 4 Revision May 1, 2016 2518 5 Revision October 30, 2016 2546 6 Revision December 17, 2017 2559 7 Revision April 16, 2018

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-6 2647 8 Revision December 27, 2020 2650 9 Revision February 2, 2020 2690 10 Revision December 27, 2021

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-7 Appendix A—Definition of Payment to Income ratio

  1. “Payment to income ratio” is the ratio of monthly repayment to disposable monthly income. For this purpose: 1.1 “Monthly repayment” is the monthly payment that is used to repay the housing loan for which the customer has applied. In calculating the monthly repayment, the full approved facility shall be taken into account. In bullet and balloon loans, the monthly interest payment shall be taken into account. In grace loans, the expected monthly payment at the end of the grace period shall be taken into account. 1.2 “Disposable monthly income” is net monthly income less fixed expenses. “Net monthly income” is the borrower’s total income that satisfies all of the following conditions: 1.2.1 the income is paid on a regular and ongoing basis; 1.2.2 the banking corporation has appropriate support documentation in regard to the income or the right to receive it; 1.2.3 the banking corporation has proof of payment, e.g., deposits or transfers to the customer’s bank account. A “fixed expense” is an expense originating in an undertaking by the borrower for which the remaining period exceeds eighteen months. Within this generality, alimony and monthly payments on account of any loan of which the remaining period exceeds eighteen months and was not included in calculating the monthly repayment (such as housing loans previously issued to the borrower, including those issued by another banking corporation) shall be taken into account. In addition to the foregoing, the housing rent expenses of a borrower who does not intend to occupy the dwelling being acquired shall also be subtracted from monthly income, even if the remaining period of the lease is shorter than eighteen months. 1.3 In calculating the payment to income ratio, in addition to the borrower’s income, half of the disposable monthly income of a relative of the borrower (hereinafter, “the relative”) may be recognized, even if said relative does not acquire rights in the land, provided that all the following conditions in respect of said relative are satisfied: 1.3.1 The relative is a first-degree family member (spouse, father, mother, brother, sister, son or daughter). 1.3.2 The relative is a guarantor of the loan; 1.3.3 The bank has checked the relative’s repayment capacity as it would for the borrower him/herself; 1.3.4 The relative pays by him/herself, from his/her bank account, 20 percent or more of the monthly repayment amount.

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-8 To remove any doubt, not more than half of the monthly disposable income of a relative who does not own a right to the land may be recognized, even if the relative signed as a borrower on the loan agreement. Notwithstanding the above, the full monthly disposable income of the borrower’s spouse may be recognized, if said spouse meets the conditions above, and resides with the borrower in the dwelling. 2. This definition replaces the definition in Reporting to Supervision Department Directive 876.

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-9 Appendix B Jerusalem, October 28, 2010 10LM0781 REG10.148.013 To: Banking Corporations—attn. Chief Executive Officer Re: Leveraged variable rate housing loans Introduction

  1. Pursuant to my letters of August 18, 2009, concerning variable rate housing loans, and of July 11, 2010, concerning developments in risks on account of housing loans, and against the background of the possible implications of the continuation of the trends described therein, I believe it correct to determine the following: Definitions
  2. “Variable rate housing loan”—a housing loan, or a portion thereof, on which the interest rate charged may change during the term of the loan.
  3. “Loan to value (LTV) ratio”—as defined in Section 14 of Reporting to Supervision Department Directive 888A, “Housing Loans.” The new instructions
  4. In regard to housing loans that meet the following two criteria: (a) an LTV ratio in excess of 60 percent; (b) the variable rate portion of the housing loan is 25 percent or more of the total housing loan issued to the customer; The risk weight (as this term is used in Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive 203) of the variable rate portion of the housing loan shall be 100 percent (instead of 35 percent or 75 percent, in accordance with the characteristics of the loan).
  5. The foregoing shall not apply to: 5.1 housing loans in which the loan sum approved for the borrower, including sums not yet drawn, is less than NIS 800,000; 5.2 housing loans issued to borrowers who meet the criteria of the Ministry of Construction and Housing for housing assistance from the state.
  6. The instructions included in this letter shall apply to loans approved on or after October 26, 2010. Respectfully,

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-10 Roni Hizkiyahu Supervisor of Banks

Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [10] (12/21) Limitations on Issuing Housing Loans Page 329-11 Appendix C—Factors of Relevance to Likelihood of Collection The list below includes examples of factors that may be relevant to the likelihood of collecting housing loans, including factors that certain banking corporations address in their methods of setting allowances. The list is not exhaustive. A banking corporation shall determine which factors are the most relevant to the likelihood of collection, include additional factors if necessary, and decide how said factors should be taken into account in setting the allowance.

  1. The quality of information in the banking corporation’s possession and the extent and depth of supervision by management and Board of Directors of the risk characteristics of housing loans;
  2. Extent of loans issued at times of relatively rapid increase in credit;
  3. Extent of loans in arrears, or for which waivers or deferrals of principal or interest have been given;
  4. Extent of loans issued at high LTV ratios;
  5. Extent of large loans and loans to borrowers whose current or potential payback consumes a significant share of their fixed income;
  6. Extent of loans with later repayment dates;
  7. Extent of loans that have significant bullet and balloon characteristics;
  8. Extent of loans that expose the borrower to a significant contractual increase in payments, including variable rate loans;
  9. Extent of loans secured by secondary collateral, where no lien exists or where the bank’s entitlement to collateral is unsecured;
  10. Extent of loans in which the banking corporation’s information about the borrower, his/her liabilities, and his/her income, or about collateral is incomplete, untimely, or unverified at the time the loan is issued;
  11. Extent of loans earmarked for the purchase of investment dwellings.