2018-04-01
The Curator of the Sable Industries Pension Fund submitted this Section 15B scheme to apportion an actuarial surplus of R28.627 million exclusively to former members as a cash top-up to minimum benefit levels. The distribution plan allocates 100% of the available surplus to the 1,479 identified former members, with unclaimed benefits designated as unclaimed funds and future recoveries directed toward upgrading minimum benefits. The Curator certifies the apportionment as equitable, confirms compliance with the 12-week stakeholder consultation period, and requests Registrar approval for implementation.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
SERVICE FEE PAID
(SCHEDULE L)
SURPLUS APPORTIONMENT SCHEME OF THE SABLE INDUSTRIES PENSION FUND (12/8/20317) ("the Fund" IN TERMS OF SECTION 15B(1)
The Curator of the Fund, has determined the following scheme for the apportionment of actuarial surplus to be submitted to the Registrar for consideration.
The actuarial surplus apportionment is only sufficient to provide minimum benefits to former member and pensioners. ("First tier" distribution only);
The surplus apportionment date (SAD) is 30 June 2003 and was determined as follows:.
| Tick | Insert date | |
|---|---|---|
| Statutory actuarial valuation date after 7 Dec 2001 | √ |
Not applicable.
The Fund is not a Bargaining Council Fund.
The membership of the Fund, including the number of eligible former members, as at the SAD is as follows:
| Number | |
|---|---|
| Active members | 0 |
| Pensioners | 111 |
| Deferred pensioners | 0 |
| Former members | 1479 |
| R'000 | R'000 | |
|---|---|---|
| ASSETS | ||
| 7.1 | Fair value of assets | 0 |
| 7.2 | Actuarial value of assets*¹ | 63,416 |
| 7.3 | Investment reserve account* | 0 |
| TOTAL ASSETS | ||
| LIABILITIES | ||
| 7.4 | Active members | 0 |
| 7.5 | Pensioners | 31,759 |
| 7.6 | Deferred pensioners | 0 |
| 7.7 | Provision for closure and liquidation² | 2,066 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES | ||
| CONTINGENCY RESERVES | ||
| 7.8 | Surplus apportionment cost reserve | 964 |
| TOTAL CONTINGENCY RESERVES | ||
| SURPLUS³ |
The investigation was conducted for the time period commencing on 1 January 1986 (the Fund's date of commencement) until the surplus apportionment date of the Fund.
No instances of improper use of surplus were found.
¹ The actuarial value of assets includes the discounted value of the estimated net future recoveries of assets as agreed with the Financial Services Board on 26 March 2010. ² The provision for future closure and liquidation expenses has been included for consistency with the inclusion of the future recoveries as agreed with the Financial Services Board on 26 March 2010. ³ Surplus equals Total Assets – Total Liabilities – Total Contingency Reserves
| R'000 | |
|---|---|
| SURPLUS AS REVEALED IN THE VALUATION⁴ | 28,627 |
| SURPLUS UTILISED IMPROPERLY⁵ | 0 |
| ACTUARIAL SURPLUS⁶ | 28,627 |
| R'000 | |
|---|---|
| Pensioners | 0 |
| Former Members | 65,592 |
| TOTAL TOP-UP COST | 65,592 |
| R'000 | % | |
|---|---|---|
| FIRST TIER DISTRIBUTION | ||
| Pensioners | 0 | 0% |
| Former members | 28,627 | 100% |
| RESIDUAL DISTRIBUTION | ||
| Former members⁷ | 0 | 0 |
| Active members | 0 | 0 |
| Pensioners | 0 | 0 |
| Deferred pensioners | 0 | 0 |
| Employer | 0 | 0 |
| TOTAL⁸ | 28,627 | 100% |
⁴ Refer to § 7 ⁵ Refer to § 8 ⁶ Actuarial surplus equals surplus as revealed in the valuation plus surplus utilised improperly ⁷ It may be necessary to split the residual surplus apportioned to former members between different tranches of former members ⁸ The total must equal the actuarial surplus as determined in § 9
| Class of stakeholder | Manner in which the actuarial surplus will be applied for their benefit |
|---|---|
| Former members | Cash payment to provide a proportionate top-up to the minimum benefit. |
| Active members | Not applicable |
| Pensioners | Not applicable |
| Deferred pensioners | Not applicable |
| Employer | Not applicable |
Note that there were no active members or deferred pensioners at the surplus apportionment date and that the minimum pension increases for pensioners were not affordable.
The surplus due to any stakeholder as a result of a surplus apportionment scheme approved by the Registrar shall be increased or decreased with fund return from the surplus apportionment date until the surplus is awarded, paid or allocated.
The Curator approved the surplus apportionment scheme.
The person appointed by the Curator to represent the interests of former members:
| Full Name: | Raymond Scott Hislop |
| Address: | PO Box 84041, Greenside, Johannesburg, 2034 |
| Telephone number: | 011 4779084 |
| Mobile number: | 082 5706124 |
| E-mail address: | None |
| Occupation: | Retired Chartered Accountant |
| Relation to Fund: | None |
The former member records were extracted from the Administrator's systems (01/01/1986 – 01/12/1994 ABSA and 01/12/1994 onward no data received from Wynne Jones, data captured manual by OMAC from files copied at Curators office) and advertisements were placed for members to register their details.
A copy of the advertisements placed by the Curator are enclosed.
| Number | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Former members for whom the calculations could be performed and who could be traced to make payment: | 551 | 37% |
| Former members for whom the calculations could be performed but who cannot be traced: | 925 | 63% |
| Former members, who have been traced but in respect of whom insufficient information could be obtained to enable the calculations to be performed (note 3): | 0 | 0% |
| Former members, who have neither been traced, nor in respect of whom the Curator has obtained sufficient information to enable the calculations to be performed (note 3): | 3 | 0% |
| Total | 1479 | 100% |
Notes: (1) The Curator is required to provide its best estimate of the total number of former members who left the fund between 1 January 1980 and the surplus apportionment date. (2) The Curator may have been able to obtain sufficient data from the administrators of the fund or the employer to enable the calculations to be performed, but cannot trace the former members. The top up benefits due to these former members should be reflected in the accounts of the fund as outstanding benefits. The Curator of the Fund is required to explain the further steps envisaged in tracing these former members: A tracing agent will be employed to obtain former member details for those who have not responded. There is an allowance in the expense budget for this tracing exercise. (3) Where the fund has not been able to trace the members at all, and the fund has insufficient information to enable the calculations to be performed, or the fund has traced the members but has not been successful in obtaining sufficient information to enable the benefit to be calculated, the Curator may set aside a contingency reserve or may offer these members an amount in settlement of any claim they might have.
No
Start date of 12-week period: 28 March 2011 End date of 12-week period: 20 June 2011
A copy of the information pack given to members, including any written statements and a copy of any presentation made to them is included with this scheme documentation.
The objections have been considered by the Curator of the fund. The complaints are summarised in Appendix I which also contains the response by the Curator.
The apportionment described above is, in the opinion of the Curator, reasonable and equitable in respect of all classes of stakeholders.
The following claims⁹ against the fund were not taken into account when determining the distribution of actuarial surplus:
Not applicable.
(noting that such claims should exclude any claims which have been recognised as liabilities by the Curator and the valuator)
Surplus apportioned to former members who cannot be traced shall constitute unclaimed benefits.
Any over budgeted amounts shall be included in distributable surplus within the bounds of practicality, prior to the final payments being made.
The surplus due to any stakeholder as a result of a surplus apportionment scheme approved by the Registrar shall be increased or decreased with fund return from the surplus apportionment date until the surplus is awarded, paid or allocated.
In terms of the communication to stakeholders, the Curator has decided that any future recoveries, after deducting associated expenses in excess of the provision made, will be apportioned to stakeholders as follows:
⁹ These do not refer to outstanding benefits or creditors, both of which should be taken into account as liabilities if transferred: these refer to pending litigation or complaints in which members or former members are demanding adjustment to amounts previously paid or to accrued liabilities which are being transferred.
The payments to former members may be effected in a number of instalments as the financial position of the Fund allows. A number of claims of former members are still being ratified at this stage and these will be included in the apportionment if possible.
DECLARATION
I, in my capacity as Curator of the Sable Industries Pension Fund (12/8/20317) declare that the information given above and in the Forms hereto is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, correct and complete.
[Signature] SIGNATURE
CAPACITY: CURATOR
9/10/11 DATE
FULL NAME IN PRINT: ANTONY LOUIS MOSTERT
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION TO THE SURPLUS APPORTIONMENT SCHEME
The Registrar requires the Fund to keep on file, as part of its fund records, a schedule containing a detailed breakdown of the surplus apportionment benefit awarded to each stakeholder, including the employer. Such a schedule should include the name (initials and surname) of every individual stakeholder as well as the amount of benefit apportioned to such stakeholder. This schedule must be presented to the Registrar upon request or inspection.
The Fund may submit such schedule to the Registrar as part of its surplus application and for a very large fund, the Registrar will accept electronic schedules, subject to prior agreement.
The schedule must be prepared so as to reconcile with the total amount of surplus available for distribution for which the fund requires the Registrar's approval.