2009-04-07
The CBFA issued Circular CBFA_2009_17 to provide recommendations and clarify existing regulatory and prudential requirements for credit institutions, insurance companies, investment firms, and management companies offering financial services via the Internet. It outlines basic principles for assessing organizational appropriateness, examines specific risks, and details requirements for internal control, compliance with rules of conduct, and managing cross-border transactions. The circular also includes an annex on sound practices for managing Internet security risks, requiring institutions to conduct a delta analysis against these guidelines and submit an action plan to the CBFA by August 31, 2009.
rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be Circular CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 Financial services via the Internet: Prudential requirements Scope: Credit institutions, insurance companies, investment firms and management companies of undertakings for collective investment and Belgian branches of these institutions which are governed by the law of a state that is not a member of the European Economic Area (EEA). The circular is also to be brought to the attention of institutions established in Belgium that are governed by the law of an EEA Member State. Summary/Objective: The first part of this circular addresses the basic principles that serve as a frame of reference for the CBFA in assessing the appropriateness of the organization put in place by financial institutions that offer services via the Internet. In particular, it will examine the risks as well as the requirements with regard to organization and internal control. Compliance with the rules of conduct will then be discussed, as will the potential impact of cross-border transactions via the Internet. In the second part, provided in annex, attention will be paid specifically to sound practices regarding the management of Internet security risks. Dear Sir or Madam,
1 See Articles 20 and 20bis of the Law of 22 March 1993 (credit institutions), Article 14bis of the Law of 9 July 1975 (insurance companies), Articles 62 and 62bis of the Law of 6 April 1995 (investment firms). For management companies of undertakings for collective investment, see Article 153 of the Law of 20 July 2004 on certain forms of collective management of investment portfolios. 2 Electronic Banking Group of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, "Risk Management Principles for Electronic Banking" (July 2003) and "Management and Supervision of Cross-Border Electronic Banking Activities" (July 2003).
CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 2 / 8 CBFA rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be The CBF’s Circular D1 2000/2 of 5 May 2000 on financial services via the Internet addressed to credit institutions and investment firms is hereby abrogated. 2. Scope A. Ratione personae The sound management practices in question apply to credit institutions, insurance companies, investment firms and management companies of undertakings for collective investment governed by Belgian law. They also apply to Belgian branches of credit institutions, insurance companies, investment firms and management companies of undertakings for collective investment that are governed by the law of a state that is not a member of the EEA. Notwithstanding the competence of the home supervisors as regards the supervision of the organization and internal control of a financial institution, it seems useful to bring the recommendations contained in this circular to the attention of branches of financial institutions governed by the law of other EEA Member States. They can be used as a guide to the CBFA's supervision of these branches. B. Ratione materiae The prudential requirements pertain to both information and advice offered via the Internet and the Internet services offered by financial institutions allowing their clients to consult and/or manage their data and to carry out transactions. Financial institutions generally use various types of websites for this purpose. Thus, in addition to purely informational websites describing the financial institution and its range of services and products, and interactive websites with educational and simulation functions, there are also transactional websites that make it possible to carry out financial transactions such as transferring funds, making payments, accessing credit, taking out insurance policies, managing information or buying or selling investment instruments. A characteristic of financial Internet services is that communication between clients and their financial institution, whether for accessing information, consulting the client's financial situation or carrying out transactions, take place via the Internet. The Internet services used in the process are for the most part, and increasingly, automated from beginning to end ("straight through processing") without human intervention; this makes it essential that the necessary internal (client identification, account status, possession of the securities sold, limits, etc.) and external (compliance of the transaction with the market rules or payment infrastructure concerned) controls be built into the Internet services. This necessity is further reinforced by the increasing tendency for transactions such as stock exchange and payment transactions to take place in real time, meaning that the time available to carry out these controls is extremely limited. Because of the attendant risks, transactional services via the Internet demand the utmost attention from a prudential perspective.
CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 3 / 8 CBFA rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be 3. Prudential requirements A. Starting points and risks attendant on offering financial services via the Internet Financial institutions that offer or conduct financial services via the Internet must - as when using any other distribution channel - comply with all legal and regulatory provisions that apply to such transactions. Furthermore, these institutions must put in place an appropriate structure and organization as well as control and security measures governing electronic information processing, and adequate internal control procedures in order appropriately to cover the specific risks attendant on using the Internet. These risks – the materialization of which can have a significant impact on an institution's financial position and reputation – concern, among other things: a) legal risks: in order to use the Internet for service provision, an institution must examine a series of (in some cases new) legal situations in Belgium or abroad that require a suitable framework; however, the legal or regulatory framework is in some cases entirely new, uncertain, incomplete or even nonexistent; b) operational risks: the use of the Internet for service provision presupposes the existence of IT and security systems and procedures that make it possible for the institution's staff to monitor client transactions or services by third party providers; the staff in question must be appropriately trained for the purpose; c) reputational risks: institutions can suffer harm to their reputation if their services via the Internet are inadequate, insecure or unreliable, if they fail to meet the expectations of their users and their audience, or if they neglect or contravene the relevant Belgian and/or foreign legal and regulatory provisions. B. Requirements with regard to an institution's organization and internal control
CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 4 / 8 CBFA rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be c) determining the technical objectives and options with regard to security, as set out in the enclosed annex; d) defining the institution's risk management policy and the implications for the various levels of control of the institution (internal control, internal and external audit, …); e) setting out the internal reporting requirements, taking into account the risks and any detected threats and security incidents; f) examination and management of the legal implications and risks; g) determining the resources and procedures for data storage; h) aligning the internal control system with the organization of the Internet services. The internal audit function should include, and evaluate, the implementation and functioning of the Internet policy in its audit planning and activities. Appropriate audit programmes and techniques should be used for the purpose. The activity is to be included in the management's annual report evaluating the internal control system3 . 3. Contractual relationships Financial institutions that allow their clients to consult and manage their data and carry out transactions via the Internet should enter into a prior agreement with their clients to this effect. A specific agreement is not necessary in the case of a purely informative website, where no personalised data can be consulted. In addition to describing the nature and scope of the services provided, such an agreement should also cover the conditions and modalities that are specific to the use of the Internet. Thus, among other things, it should include a precise description and demarcation of the responsibilities of each party in using the technologies provided or recommended by the institution for the purpose of identifying and authenticating the client and validating the transactions. Compliance with the legislation on the prevention of money-laundering also requires that an institution be able to suspend the execution of a client's transactions for the purpose of a regulatory check and/or to refuse to execute them. Furthermore, if external suppliers are used for the provision, development, management or support of websites or Internet services, institutions should make sure they enter into a suitable contract; the same is true for any counterparties and for the markets, regulated or otherwise, involved in the provision of Internet services. 4. Security Financial institutions which provide services via the Internet face various security risks. The annex provides an overview of sound management practices which the CBFA expects financial institutions to follow when updating their security plans. These sound management practices distinguish between points and recommendations related to the security of: x on the one hand, an institution's own IT infrastructure (internal computer infrastructure, firewalls, email and web servers, etc.) against threats associated with the Internet, and x on the other hand, financial transactions, consultations and management activities via the Internet. These sound management practices are relevant for both large and small institutions, although the characteristics of the Internet services offered and the threats faced may vary from one institution to another. Financial institutions are expected to comply with these sound practices or explain any deviations to the CBFA ("comply or explain").
3 See Circular CBFA_2008_12 of 9 May 2008 concerning the senior management's report on the evaluation of the internal control system and the statement by senior management concerning periodic prudential reporting.
CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 5 / 8 CBFA rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be Financial institutions are asked:
Depending on the nature and importance of the websites and Internet services offered and the continuity objectives sought, the institution should have appropriate emergency plans and provisions in order to be able to withstand large-scale disruptions to the Internet service. The principles set out in Circulars PPB 2005/2 and PPB/D.256 of 10 March 2005 on "Sound management practices in respect of business continuity planning for financial institutions" continue to be fully applicable. When drawing up these emergency plans and in particular during the risk assessment and business impact analysis, attention should be paid to the "(D)DOS” attacks4 which, though still limited, are nonetheless rapidly increasing; these attacks seek to cause serious - and in some cases lengthy - disruption to the availability of the websites and Internet services provided. The financial institution is required to ensure an adequate follow-up of the transactions passed on to it via the Internet, by putting in place procedures to provide for their correct processing and to manage the inherent risks appropriately. The institution must see to it that the staff who (may) deal with the Internet applications are suitably trained. 6. Involvement of external service providers Where certain activities relating to the offer of websites and/or financial services via the Internet are outsourced, or where external service providers are used for the necessary support, the financial institution should obtain the necessary guarantees that the said service provider has the capacity and competence necessary to carry out the outsourced tasks in a reliable and professional manner and thereby to ensure the continuity of the service. Where the institution outsources the management of websites and/or Internet services to a third party, senior management - the management committee, where applicable - should also ensure that the external service provider has the necessary independent security tests carried out (see Annex, points
4 (D)DOS attacks, i.e. "(Distributed) Denial of Service" attacks, are intended to make the Internet sites of individuals or companies unavailable by saturating the sites over a period of time with enormous quantities of (sometimes specially designed) Internet messages.
CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 6 / 8 CBFA rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be 2.2.9 and 3.2.7), that the institution is informed of the results of these tests and that the service provider periodically and as often as necessary evaluates the security of the Internet services offered in the light of developments with regard to security threats. If the service provider does not perform all the aforementioned security tasks, then the institution itself must take charge of carrying them out; the respective responsibilities of the parties concerned must be clearly laid out in the contract with the external service provider. Moreover, the financial institution's contract with the service provider must stipulate that the institution has the right on its own initiative to have a security audit carried out. The principles set out in Circulars PPB 2004/5 of 22 June 2004 and PPB 2006/1 of 6 February 2006 on "Sound management practices for outsourcing" continue to be fully applicable.
5 See, among others, Circular PPB 2004/8 of 22 November 204 as amended by Circular PPB 20O5/5 of 12 July 2005. 6 Article 27, § 1, of the Law of 2 August 2002 on the supervision of the financial sector and on financial services.
CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 7 / 8 CBFA rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be take measures to avoid conflicts of interest7 , as well as its obligation to obtain the best possible result when executing orders8 . When executing orders or receiving and transmitting orders relating to complex financial instruments, the financial institution must have first obtained information from its client regarding the latter's knowledge and experience. If the service or the product is not suited to the client in question, the institution should have the necessary system in place to warn the client of this. Some financial institutions offer their clients the option of receiving investment advice via the Internet. In that case, the institution will have to observe the duty of care referred to in Article 27, § 4, of the Law of 2 August 2002. Before any investment advice services can be offered, the institution must make the necessary IT arrangements to ensure that for each client, only such transactions may be carried out as are deemed appropriate to his knowledge and experience, financial situation and investment objectives. Insurance companies should refer in particular to:
7 Article 20bis, § 2, of the Law of 22 March 1993 on the legal status and supervision of credit institutions, and Article 62bis of the Law of 6 April 1995 on the legal status of and supervision of investment firms. 8 Article 28 of the Law of 2 August 2002 on the supervision of the financial sector and on financial services. 9
CBFA_2009_17 of 07/04/2009 8 / 8 CBFA rue du Congrès/Congresstraat 12-14 | 1000 Brussels p +32 2 220 53 42| f +32 2 220 54 93 | www.cbfa.be For insurance intermediation as well as for financial or banking services other than investment services, the intermediary must comply with the rules protecting the general good, including the rules of conduct, of the country on whose territory he offers or provides his services (the host country). As regards investment services, credit institutions and investment firms must comply with both the organizational rules and the rules of conduct of the country of origin (the home country). The host country cannot impose its own rules regarding investment services. However, other rules of the host country, such as the law on the prevention of money-laundering or any language legislation, do apply. The same principles are applied, in the draft UCITS IV Directive10 to management companies of undertakings for collective investment. With respect to the use of a website, more specifically, several foreign supervisors have taken the view that where an offer from abroad of services or of instruments via the Internet is directed or available to investors in their territory, that offer is considered to be made in their territory. When assessing these criteria, each case is generally examined separately in order to determine, among other things, whether the nationals of the country in question are being specifically targeted (language use, prices quoted in that country's currency, mention of local contact addresses) or whether in reality transactions or services are carried out via the website, and whether investors are solicited by email or other forms of communication technology. The institution must, therefore, carefully outline its business objectives and ensure that if it solicits clients on the territory of another State via its website, it complies, where applicable, with the rules of the State in question. In order to make sure that its actions are not misunderstood in countries that are not being targeted, an institution can take one or more of the following measures: a) mention on the website that it is intended for investors within a clearly defined geographical area in which the firm is active and complies with local regulations (mention notifications, warnings and disclaimers); in order to determine the location of the investor and to check whether he falls within the target group, the institution can use post, telephone or special localisation techniques; b) ensure that the content of the website or other promotional materials (e.g. in the media or the press) is not in contravention of the rules in force in the aforementioned geographical target area (e.g. if the website is not addressed to British clients, no local addresses or prices in GBP should be mentioned); c) provide for access control through password protection for all or part of the website, to which only persons belonging to the target group will receive passwords; d) contact local supervisors in order to make sure that the website does not contravene local regulations. Yours sincerely, Jean-Paul Servais Chairman Annex: CBFA-2009-17-1 / Sound practices for managing Internet security risks.
10 Article 18(3) of the draft Directive.