2024-05-23

Regulation to amend Regulation 25-102 respecting Designated Benchmarks and Benchmark Administrators

The securities regulatory authority in Québec amends Regulation 25-102 to establish specific criteria for designating benchmarks as critical, regulated-data, interest rate, or commodity benchmarks. These amendments define the conditions under which a benchmark may be designated based on its market significance, lack of substitutes, potential adverse impacts on financial stability, or the nature of its underlying data sources. The regulation also grants the authority discretionary power to designate any benchmark deemed sufficiently important to financial markets or posing significant risk to users or the public.

Autorite des marches financiers Quebec logo

Canada

Autorite des marches financiers Quebec

Click to view thumbnail

REGULATION TO AMEND REGULATION 25-102 RESPECTING DESIGNATED BENCHMARKS AND BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATORS Securities Act (chapter V-1.1, s. 331.1, par. (9.2.1), (9.3), (9.5) and (9.6), and s. 333)

  1. Section 1 of Regulation 25-102 respecting Designated Benchmarks and Benchmark Administrators (chapter V-1.1, r. 8.2) is amended by inserting the following after subsection (8): “(8.1) In Québec, the securities regulatory authority may designate a benchmark as a critical benchmark only if it fulfills one or more of the following criteria and conditions: (a) the benchmark: (i) is used, by itself or within a combination of benchmarks, as a reference for contracts, derivatives, investment funds, instruments or securities that have a total value in one or more jurisdictions of Canada that is significant on the basis of all the range of maturities or tenors of the benchmark, where applicable; and (ii) has no appropriate substitute in that part of the market or economy the benchmark is intended to represent; (b) there would be significant and adverse impacts on market integrity, financial stability, the economy, or the financing of businesses in one or more jurisdictions of Canada or a significant number of market participants in one or more jurisdictions of Canada resulting from any of the following situations: (i) the benchmark administrator ceases to provide the benchmark; (ii) input data is not reliable or is no longer sufficient to provide a benchmark that accurately and reliably represents that part of the market or economy the benchmark is intended to represent. “(8.2) In Québec, the securities regulatory authority may designate a benchmark as a regulated-data benchmark only if the benchmark is determined by the application of a methodology to any of the following: (a) transaction data that is provided entirely from: (i) one or more of the following: (A) a recognized exchange in a jurisdiction of Canada or an exchange that is subject to appropriate regulation in a foreign jurisdiction; (B) a recognized quotation and trade reporting system in a jurisdiction of Canada or a quotation and trade reporting system that is subject to appropriate regulation in a foreign jurisdiction; (C) an alternative trading system that is registered as a dealer in a jurisdiction of Canada or recognized as an exchange in Québec, and is a member of a self-regulatory entity, or an alternative trading system that is subject to appropriate regulation in a foreign jurisdiction; (D) a marketplace that is similar or analogous to the marketplaces referred to in subparagraph (A), (B) or (C) and that is subject to appropriate regulation in a jurisdiction of Canada or a foreign jurisdiction; or (ii) a service provider to which the benchmark administrator of the benchmark has outsourced the data collection in accordance with section 13, if the service provider receives the data entirely and directly from a marketplace referred to in subparagraph (i);

2 (b) net asset values of investment funds that are reporting issuers in a jurisdiction of Canada or subject to appropriate regulation in a foreign jurisdiction. “(8.3) In Québec, the securities regulatory authority may designate a benchmark as an interest rate benchmark only if the benchmark is used, or is expected to be used, to set an interest rate in a transaction, including a benchmark that is determined by using any of the following: (a) the rate at which financial institutions could lend to, or borrow from, other financial institutions, or market participants other than financial institutions, in the money market; (b) a survey of rates contributed by financial institutions that routinely accept bankers’ acceptances issued by borrowers and are market makers in bankers’ acceptances either directly or through an affiliated entity. “(8.4) In Québec, the securities regulatory authority may designate a benchmark as a commodity benchmark only if the benchmark is determined by reference to or an assessment of an underlying interest that is a commodity other than a currency. “(8.5) Despite subsections (8.1) to (8.4), in Québec, the securities regulatory authority may designate a benchmark if the benchmark is sufficiently important to financial or commodity markets or if it exposes these markets, the benchmark users or the public to a sufficiently important risk.”. 2. This Regulation comes into force on (indicate here the date of coming into force of this Regulation).