2023-06-01
Canadian securities regulators amended Policy Statement 11-202 to modernize multi-jurisdictional prospectus reviews by standardizing terminology and mandating electronic submissions through SEDAR+. The revisions replace outdated regulatory references, update filing confirmation procedures to occur simultaneously with material submission, and establish precise working-day timeframes for principal regulators and the Ontario Securities Commission to review preliminary prospectus amendments. These streamlined processes reduce administrative delays while preserving regulatory flexibility for complex or deferred reviews.
AMENDMENTS TO POLICY STATEMENT 11-202 RESPECTING PROCESS FOR PROSPECTUS REVIEWS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
2 9. Section 7.3 of the Policy Statement is amended: (1) by replacing “SEDAR” by “SEDAR+”; (2) by replacing “the filer provides a letter to the principal regulator with the materials confirming the following” by “at the same time as filing the materials, the filer confirms to the principal regulator that”. 10. Section 8.1 of the Policy Statement is amended by striking out paragraph (1.1). 11. Section 8.2 of the Policy Statement is amended by striking out, in paragraph (1), “by letter”. 12. Section 10.1 of the Policy Statement is amended by replacing “the filer provides a letter to the principal regulator with the materials confirming the following”, in paragraph (2), by “at the same time as filing the materials, the filer confirms to the principal regulator that”. 13. The Policy Statement is amended by replacing section 10.3 by the following: “(1) If a filer files a preliminary prospectus amendment before the principal regulator provides its comments relating to the preliminary prospectus materials, the principal regulator may be unable to complete its review of the preliminary prospectus materials and provide its comments within the time-period indicated in section 5.4(1) or 5.5(1) of this policy statement, as applicable. The principal regulator will use its best efforts to provide its comments on the later of the date that is (a) in the case of a long form prospectus, five working days after the date of the receipt for the preliminary prospectus amendment and the original due date for the comments; and (b) in the case of a short form prospectus or a shelf prospectus, three working days after the date of the receipt for the preliminary prospectus amendment and the original due date for the comments. Similarly, in the case of a dual prospectus, if a filer files a preliminary prospectus amendment before the OSC completes its review under section 5.4(2) or 5.5(2) of this policy statement, the OSC may be unable to complete its review within the relevant time-periods. The OSC will use its best efforts to advise the principal regulator by the later of (a) the date that is three working days after the date of the receipt for the preliminary prospectus amendment, and (b) the original due date for advising the principal regulator of any concerns with the materials that, if left unresolved, would cause it to opt out of the dual review. “(2) If a filer files a preliminary long form prospectus amendment after the principal regulator has provided its comments, (a) the principal regulator will use its best efforts to review the materials and provide comments within three working days of the date of the receipt for the preliminary long form prospectus amendment; and (b) in the case of a dual prospectus, the OSC will use its best efforts to advise the principal regulator, within three working days of the date of the receipt for the preliminary long form prospectus amendment, of any concerns with the materials that, if left unresolved, would cause it to opt out of the dual review. “(3) If a filer files a preliminary short form prospectus amendment or preliminary shelf prospectus amendment after the principal regulator has provided its comments,
3 (a) the principal regulator will use its best efforts to review the materials and provide comments within two working days of the date of the receipt for the preliminary short form prospectus amendment or preliminary shelf prospectus amendment; and (b) in the case of a dual prospectus, the OSC will use its best efforts to advise the principal regulator, within two working days of the date of the receipt for the preliminary short form prospectus amendment or preliminary shelf prospectus amendment, of any concerns with the materials that, if left unresolved, would cause it to opt out of the dual review. “(4) The time periods in subsections (2) and (3) may not apply in circumstances where it would be more appropriate for the principal regulator and, in the case of a dual prospectus, the OSC, to review the amendment materials at a different stage of the review process. For example, the principal regulator and the OSC may wish to defer reviewing the amendment materials until after receiving and reviewing the filer’s responses to comments already issued on the preliminary prospectus materials.”. 14. Section 10.4 of the Policy Statement is amended by replacing “issue a comment letter” by “provide comments”. 15. Section 10.5 of the Policy Statement is amended: (1) by replacing “SEDAR” by “SEDAR+”; (2) by replacing “the filer provides a letter to the principal regulator with the materials confirming the following” by “at the same time as filing the materials, the filer confirms to the principal regulator that”. 16. The Policy Statement is amended by replacing the title of Part 12 by the following: “PART 12 EFFECTIVE DATE”. 17. Section 12.2 of the Policy Statement is repealed. 18. The Policy Statement is amended by replacing “SEDAR”, wherever it appears, by “SEDAR+”.