2013-12-19
Added · Updated
Insurers are prohibited from letting forward rates separately converge to the Ultimate Forward Rate (UFR) in every interest rate scenario when valuing options and guarantees for the adequacy test. This restriction ensures consistency with the current yield curve used for discounting and aligns with the theorem of arbitrage-free pricing. Insurers must explain their valuation methods and may refer to the Good Practice – Adequacy Test for Life Insurers for guidance.
Base law
Alg. 0 RSMTVV (Refers to an external site)
Q&A
Read aloud
Question:
In valuing options and guarantees for the purpose of the adequacy test, may insurers let the forward rates separately converge to the Ultimate Forward Rate (UFR) in every interest rate scenario?
In valuing options and guarantees for the purpose of the adequacy test, may insurers let the forward rates separately converge to the Ultimate Forward Rate (UFR) in every interest rate scenario?
Published: 19 December 2013
Answer:
1 - No, they may not. The UFR relates solely to the current interest rate curve used to discount insurance liabilities in the adequacy test. As the UFR and its calibration bear no relationship to expectations about the level and volatility of future yield curves, the UFR does not affect the interest rate volatilities applied in the adequacy test.
2 - No, they may not. Doing so is incompatible not only with a consistent application of the yield curve in the method to value options and guarantees but also with the theorem of arbitrage-free pricing. The current yield curve by which cash flows accrue interest must be equal to the yield curve by which they are discounted.
In valuing options (e.g. the options of policyholders which are implicit in the insurance) and guarantees for the purpose of the adequacy test, insurers apply a range of methods including economic scenario generators and closed form formulas. The introduction of the UFR in the current interest rate curve of the adequacy test is not intended to make immediate changes to the methods used to value options and guarantees, including the adjustment of interest rate scenarios such that the forward rates separately converge to the UFR in every scenario. Any changes to the valuation method for options and guarantees must be applied consistently and must be reconcilable as much as possible with the theorem of arbitrage-free pricing.
Naturally, insurers must explain how they value options and guarantees in the adequacy test.
Insurers may use the Good Practice – Adequacy Test for Life Insurers when valuing options and guarantees and drafting the related explanatory notes.
Discover related articles
Q&A
Capital
Capital requirements
Insurers
Share:
Share on LinkedIn
Share on X
Share on Facebook
Share via Email
Base law
Alg. 0 RSMTVV (Refers to an external site)
Interesting articles
Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years
15 July 2026
News item supervision
Dutch insurers and pension funds are investing more and more in private assets, such as private equity and private credit. By 2025, they had a combined total of €276 billion worth of these investments on their books.
Read more Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years
News item supervision
15 July 2026
De Nederlandsche Bank publishes ‘Integrity Supervision in Focus 2026’
25 June 2026
News item supervision
In the third edition of ‘Integrity Supervision in Focus’ (ISF), we share the key insights from our integrity supervision.
Read more De Nederlandsche Bank publishes ‘Integrity Supervision in Focus 2026’
News item supervision
25 June 2026
DNB email on technical adjustments
25 June 2026
News item supervision
This week, you may receive an email from De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB). This email concerns technical adjustments required to continue corresponding with DNB by email.
Read more DNB email on technical adjustments
News item supervision
25 June 2026
Update FATF-warning lists June 2026
23 June 2026
News item supervision
FATF released an update of its ‘grey’ and ‘black’ lists.
Read more Update FATF-warning lists June 2026
News item supervision
23 June 2026
Necessary cookies
To ensure the proper operation of the website, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) uses functional cookies and analytics cookies, and has taken measures to ensure that these cookies have little or no impact on the privacy of website users.
Optional cookies
Some pages include embedded content from external websites. These websites may use proprietary (tracking) cookies. This allows third parties to track visitor statistics, show personalised content and display targeted ads, for example.
You can make your choice about allowing these optional cookies both when you first visit the website and when you navigate to a page with embedded content.