2022-08-02
The Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions clarifies that binding formal loan commitments must be included in calculating a financial institution’s legal lending limit under state law, regardless of actual funding. Institutions can avoid statutory violations by structuring agreements to cap unconditional funding obligations or limit actual advances within legal thresholds. Examiners will cite apparent lending limit breaches when formally originated commitments exceed statutory caps and obligate the institution to fund beyond those limits.
# STATE OF LOUISIANA
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA
---
## FORMAL LOAN COMMITMENTS
**OFI Advisory Opinion No. 2**
**October 1, 2001**
### Purpose
This advisory opinion is to clarify when to include loan commitments for purposes of calculating a financial institution’s loan-to-one-borrower limit. On occasion, violations of the Louisiana Banking Law (LBL) occur because management does not realize that a formal loan commitment is included in the calculation of the legal lending limit. Generally, loan commitments should be included; however, circumstances may exist that would cause their exclusion from the calculation.
### Issue
Does a violation of the LBL occur when a loan commitment exceeds a financial institution’s legal lending limit but has not actually been funded?
### Analysis
Loan commitments may exceed a bank's legal lending limit and be a violation of state law. If a financial institution enters into a **binding commitment** to fund a loan or line of credit, the institution must do so when called on or failure to advance the funds could subject the financial institution to possible legal action for breach of the agreement or alternative legal theories such as fraudulent or tortuous misrepresentation, negligence, promissory estoppel, or detrimental reliance. These types of “binding” extensions of credit would be included in the loan-to-one-borrower limits.
A financial institution may, however, enter into a loan commitment that exceeds its legal lending limit as long as it is not unconditionally obligated to advance funds under such agreement in an amount, which would cause a violation. One way to avoid this is to include specific language in the loan agreement limiting the **actual advance of funds** by the financial institution to an amount that would not cause a violation.
---
POST OFFICE BOX 94095, BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70804-9095 (225) 925-4660
DEPOSITORY & ADMINISTRATION - FAX # (225) 925-4548
LEGAL, NON-DEPOSITORY & SECURITIES - FAX # (225) 925-4524
web site: www.ofi.louisiana.gov email: ofila@ofi.louisiana.gov
---
**OFI Advisory Opinion No. 2**
**September 26, 2001**
**Page - 2 -**
### Conclusion
Regardless of actual funding, OFI examiners will cite an apparent violation of the LBL if a loan commitment exceeding the financial institution’s statutory limits is formally originated **and** the institution is obligated to fund the loan in excess of its legal lending limit.
*John D. Travis*
Commissioner of Financial Institutions