CSA Multilateral Staff Notice 31-367: Consultation on Exempt Market Dealer Participation in Prospectus Selling Groups

1 CSA Multilateral Staff Notice 31-367 Notice and Consultation Regarding CSA Coordinated Blanket Order 31-930 Exemption to Allow Exempt Market Dealer Participation in Selling Groups in Offerings of Securities Under a Prospectus November 27, 2025 Introduction The securities regulatory authorities in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec, and Saskatchewan (the Participating Jurisdictions) are publishing this staff notice and consultation questions to inform stakeholders that the temporary Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) Coordinated Blanket Order 31-930 Exemption to Allow Exempt Market Dealer Participation in Selling Groups in Offerings of Securities Under a Prospectus (the Blanket Order) expires on December 20, 2025 and will not be extended. The Participating Jurisdictions are also seeking feedback on the exemption that was provided in the Blanket Order to assist in future policy￾making, including to consider whether a revised exemption should be published in the future. Background Early-stage, small- and medium-sized issuers are an important part of the provincial economies, serving as key contributors to employment, quality of life, and income within communities. Exempt market dealers play an important role in assisting these issuers in raising capital by acting as dealers or underwriters for the issuers' securities and distributing the issuers' securities under exemptions from the prospectus requirement. As the issuers grow and mature, they may seek financing through offerings of their securities under a prospectus. Exempt market dealers are often limited in their ability to continue to support these issuers at this stage because exempt market dealers can only participate in a distribution of securities to investors if the distribution is made in reliance on an exemption from the prospectus requirement. Generally, the appropriate dealer registration category for participating in distributions of securities under a prospectus is the investment dealer category. However, allowing exempt market dealers to participate as members of a selling group in prospectus offerings may make available additional sources of capital to issuers, may provide investors with more investment opportunities, and may allow exempt market dealers to participate in more of an issuer’s lifecycle (i.e., from early to growth or maturity stage). In late June 2024, the securities regulatory authorities in Alberta, British Columbia, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec, Saskatchewan, and Yukon (the Blanket Order Participating Jurisdictions) published the Blanket Order setting out a temporary exemption from the restrictions set out in paragraph 7.1(2)(d) of Regulation 31-103 respecting Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations (Regulation 31-103) so that exempt market dealers could

2 participate in prospectus offerings as members of selling groups.1 The Blanket Order will expire on December 20, 2025. Exempt market dealer participation in selling groups of prospectus offerings Exempt market dealers that intend to rely on the Blanket Order are required under Regulation 33-109 respecting Registration Information to report a change in business activity by filing a Form 33-109F5 Change of Registration Information indicating that they will be participating as members of selling groups in prospectus offerings. As of October 20, 2025, only three exempt market dealers have made such filing and, of the three firms, only two have participated in selling groups in prospectus offerings. The two firms each participated in two prospectus offerings. We are seeking feedback as set out below to consider if a new exemption should be issued to allow exempt market dealer participation in selling groups in prospectus offerings. Q1. Are there any significant factors not identified below that contributed to the limited use of the Blanket Order? Q2. Do stakeholders have any additional feedback on the exemption to allow the participation of exempt market dealers in selling groups for prospectus offerings? Stakeholder feedback Through inquiries from and outreach to stakeholders since the publication of the Blanket Order, the Participating Jurisdictions received feedback on the Blanket Order in the following areas:

1. Participation limit Stakeholders raised concerns that the restriction on compensation that an exempt market dealer may receive for their participation in a selling group reduces the incentive for exempt market dealers to rely on the exemption, and that an exempt market dealer may earn more compensation by distributing other securities or from a referral arrangement. Staff note that the condition in the Blanket Order that limits the compensation for an exempt market dealer does not set the amount of compensation that exempt market dealers may receive. Rather, the condition establishes the maximum percentage of compensation that exempt market dealers participating in selling groups may receive. It was intended to reflect the exempt market dealers’ participation in the selling group compared to investment dealers (i.e., exempt market dealers are not acting as underwriters and are not signing the underwriter certificate). Q3. Should compensation to exempt market dealers that participate as members of selling groups in prospectus offerings be limited? Why or why not? Q4. If compensation to exempt market dealers that participate as members of selling groups in prospectus offerings should be limited, how should the limit on compensation be established? 1 The local blanket orders were published by the securities regulatory authorities in Alberta, British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Québec, Saskatchewan, and Yukon on June 20, 2024, and in New Brunswick on June 27, 2024.

3 Q5. Are there mechanisms other than on compensation limits that can serve a similar role? 2. Exempt market dealers cannot access electronic settlement Stakeholders noted that exempt market dealers cannot participate in electronic settlement through the Canadian Depository for Securities. Additionally, exempt market dealers are unable to enter into a carrying broker arrangement with investment dealers because investment dealers may only offer carrying broker services to other investment dealers and mutual fund dealers. As a result, if an exempt market dealer participates in a selling group for a prospectus offering, the issuer must be willing to accommodate by providing paper certificates, which increases costs and complexity to the transaction to the issuer. Q6. To what extent does the inability of an exempt market dealer to access electronic settlement impact an issuer’s or underwriter’s decision to include an exempt market dealer in a selling group of a prospectus offering? 3. Exempt market dealers cannot subsequently advise clients on the securities purchased An exempt market dealer may not necessarily be able to subsequently advise a client regarding securities purchased under a prospectus and may be reluctant to refer the client to an investment dealer who is able to advise on those securities. Specifically, except as set out in the Blanket Order, exempt market dealers are permitted to: • trade or underwrite securities if the trade is a distribution made under a prospectus exemption; • participate in the resale of securities that are subject to resale restrictions; and • participate in the resale of securities, if a prospectus exemption would be available to the seller if the trade were a distribution and the class of securities is not listed, quoted or traded on a marketplace. An exempt market dealer would only be able to subsequently advise a client on the securities purchased in the circumstances outlined above. Additionally, exempt market dealers are not permitted to establish an omnibus account with an investment dealer and trade listed securities through the investment dealer on behalf of their clients since this activity is trading in listed securities which exempt market dealers are not permitted to do as set out in subparagraph 7.1(2)(d)(ii) of Regulation 31-103. In such cases, secondary trading in listed securities must be conducted through an investment dealer in accordance with the rules and requirements applicable to investment dealers. Q7. To what extent does the inability of an exempt market dealer to subsequently advise clients on the securities purchased affect an exempt market dealer’s decision to participate in selling groups for prospectus offerings? 4. Issuers’ and Investment Dealers’ Awareness of the Blanket Order Some stakeholders suggested that there was limited awareness of the Blanket Order among issuers and investment dealers. As a result, issuers and investment dealers may not have been informed that exempt market dealers could have participated in a selling group for prospectus offerings, which may have impacted the use of the Blanket Order. The Blanket Order Participating Jurisdictions issued a

4 news release when the Blanket Order was issued. Staff are aware that many law firms issued communications regarding the Blanket Order. Additionally, certain jurisdictions used mass email communications and other publications to highlight the Blanket Order. Staff also received feedback that there may be difficulties for exempt market dealers to participate in selling groups under a prospectus offering because investment dealers may not have understood the conditions to include exempt market dealers and may have been reluctant to include them. Q8. Please comment on other steps that could be taken to increase awareness among issuers and investment dealers if a new blanket order is issued. Q9. Is there any confusion as to how issuers and investment dealers may involve exempt market dealers in selling groups in prospectus offerings? Q10. Are there any other factors that may affect the decision of an issuer or an investment dealer to include exempt market dealers in a selling group of a prospectus offering? Comment and submissions The Participating Jurisdictions invite participants to provide input on the issues outlined in this staff notice and consultation questions. The consultation period expires January 26, 2026. Address your submission to all of the Participating Jurisdictions as follows: Alberta Securities Commission Autorité des marchés financiers British Columbia Securities Commission Financial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick Nova Scotia Securities Commission Ontario Securities Commission Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan Submit your comments through the CSA consultation page. Your comments will be distributed to the Participating Jurisdictions. If Québec is a participating jurisdiction, and you are submitting your comments through the link above, you are also submitting your comments to: Me Philippe Lebel Corporate Secretary and Executive Director, Legal Affairs Autorité des marchés financiers Place de la Cité, tour PwC 2640, boulevard Laurier, bureau 400 Québec (Québec) G1V 5C1 Fax: 514-864-8381 Email: consultation-en-cours@lautorite.qc.ca We cannot keep submissions confidential because securities legislation in certain provinces requires publication of the written comments received during the comment period. All comments received will be posted on the websites of the Alberta Securities Commission at www.asc.ca, the

5 Autorité des marchés financiers at www.lautorite.qc.ca, and the Ontario Securities Commission at www.osc.ca. Therefore, you should not include personal information directly in comments to be published. It is important that you state on whose behalf you are making the submission. Content may be moderated so that all submissions are respectful and professional. Questions Please refer your questions to any of the following: Pascale Toupin Director, Oversight of Intermediaries Autorité des marchés financiers Email: pascale.toupin@lautorite.qc.ca Gabriel Chénard Senior Policy Analyst, Oversight of Intermediaries Autorité des marchés financiers Email: gabriel.chenard@lautorite.qc.ca Bonnie Kuhn Senior Legal Counsel, Market Regulation Alberta Securities Commission Email: bonnie.kuhn@asc.ca Khalil Jessa Senior Legal Counsel, Capital Markets Regulation British Columbia Securities Commission Email: kjessa@bcsc.bc.ca Clayton Mitchell Registration and Compliance Manager Financial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick Email: clayton.mitchell@fcnb.ca Doug Harris General Counsel, Director of Market Regulation and Policy and Secretary Nova Scotia Securities Commission Email: doug.harris@novascotia.ca Gloria Tsang Senior Legal Counsel, Trading & Markets Ontario Securities Commission Email: gtsang@osc.gov.on.ca Namrata Bhagia Legal Counsel, Trading & Markets Ontario Securities Commission Email: nbhagia@osc.gov.on.ca

6 Vladimir Goryushin Legal Counsel, Trading & Markets Ontario Securities Commission Email: vgoryushin@osc.gov.on.ca Mobolanle Depo-Fajumo Senior Legal Counsel, Securities Division Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan Email: mobolanle.depofajumo2@gov.sk.ca