Circular NBB_2016_14 on Guidelines on Basis Risk When Applying Risk Mitigation Techniques in SCR Calculation under the Standard Formula

NBB_2016_14 – 25 April 2016 Circular – Page 1/4 14 Berlaimont Boulevard – BE-1000 Brussels tel. +32 2 221 38 12 – fax +32 2 221 31 04 company number: 0203.201.340 RPM Brussels www.bnb.be Circular Brussels, 25 April 2016 Reference: NBB_2016_14 your contact: Kajal Vandenput tel. +32 2 221 51 77 – fax +32 2 221 31 04 Kajal.vandenput@nbb.be Circular regarding guidelines on basis risk when applying risk mitigation techniques in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement under the standard formula Scope Belgian insurance or reinsurance undertakings. Insurance or reinsurance undertakings that are part of a Belgian group within the meaning of Article 339, 2° of the Act of 13 March 2016 on the status and supervision of insurance or reinsurance undertakings. Belgian undertakings that are part of a Belgian financial conglomerate within the meaning of Article 340, 1° of the aforementioned Act of 13 March 2016. Branches of undertakings from third countries carrying on insurance [or reinsurance] activities in Belgium. This circular applies to mutual insurance companies defined in Article 15, 79° of the aforementioned Act of 13 March 2016. For these undertakings, "the Bank" should be replaced by "the Office for the Supervision of Mutualities and National Unions of Mutualities" as defined in Article 15, 84° of the same Act. This circular does not apply to insurance undertakings referred to in Articles 275, 276 or 294 of the aforementioned Act of 13 March 2016. Subject This circular aims to explain the Bank's guidelines regarding the treatment of risk mitigation techniques in the calculation of the solvency capital under the standard formula. Legal References The Act: The Act of 13 March 2016 on the status and supervision of insurance or reinsurance undertakings. Regulation 2015/35: Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 of the Commission of 10 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II).

Circular – Page 2/4 NBB_2016_14 – 25 April 2016 Structure I. Objectives II. Definitions III. Additional Information IV. Entry into Force V. Guidelines on the Application of the "Life Underwriting Risk" Module Madam, Sir, I. Objectives This circular relates to Articles 154 to 160 of the Act. It aims to provide additional specifications on the treatment of risk mitigation techniques in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement for undertakings of all types and sizes within the framework of Solvency II. It concerns undertakings and professionals responsible for the treatment of risk mitigation techniques in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement using the standard formula. II. Definitions In the absence of a definition in this circular, terms have the meaning defined in the legislative and regulatory acts referenced therein. III. Additional Information This circular is part of the harmonized implementation of the principles of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), as determined by the guidelines of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority. Undertakings may consult these guidelines for information at the following address: https://eiopa.europa.eu/publications/eiopa-guidelines. IV. Entry into Force This circular applies from 23 March 2016. V. Guidelines on the Consideration of Basis Risk Guideline 1 – Risk Mitigation Techniques without Significant Basis Risk Undertakings should consider that a risk mitigation technique does not result in significant basis risk if the following conditions are met: (a) the exposure covered by the risk mitigation technique is of a nature sufficiently similar to that of the undertaking's risk exposure;

NBB_2016_14 – 25 April 2016 Circular – Page 3/4 (b) the fluctuations in the value of the exposure covered by the risk mitigation technique reflect the fluctuations in the value of the undertaking's risk exposure across a full range of risk scenarios, including scenarios consistent with the confidence level referred to in Article 151, § 3, of the Act. Guideline 2 – Financial Risk Mitigation Techniques: Criteria for Assessing Significant Basis Risk Before taking into account financial risk mitigation techniques in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement using the standard formula, undertakings should evaluate, inter alia: (a) the relative importance of basis risk compared to the exposure covered by the risk mitigation technique and the undertaking's risk exposure without taking into account other balance sheet items, unless there is a continuous and consistent link between other balance sheet items and the undertaking's risk exposure; (b) the similar nature of the exposures referred to in Guideline 1, taking into account at least the type and terms of the relevant instruments or agreements and the rules governing the markets on which they are listed or which provide data for their valuation; (c) the fluctuations in the value of the exposures across a full range of risk scenarios referred to in Guideline 1, including all scenarios taken into account in the relevant modules or sub-modules of the standard formula, taking into account at least: (i) the degree of symmetry between the two exposures; (ii) all non-linear dependencies according to the scenario; (iii) any relevant asymmetry in behaviors in risk sub-modules where both upward and downward stress tests are applied; (iv) the diversification levels of each respective exposure; (v) any relevant risks not explicitly taken into account in the standard formula; (vi) the full distribution of payments applicable to the risk mitigation technique. The risk mitigation technique should be considered as resulting in significant basis risk if the aforementioned assessment does not provide sufficient evidence that changes in the value of the exposure covered by the risk mitigation technique reflect all significant fluctuations in the value of the undertaking's risk exposure. If the conditions of a risk mitigation technique specify a cap for maximum protection against losses as a proportion of the initial exposure, undertakings should apply the assessment only to the proportion covered by the risk mitigation technique when determining if basis risk is significant. Guideline 3 – Insurance Risk Mitigation Techniques without Significant Basis Risk Before taking into account an insurance risk mitigation technique in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement using the standard formula, undertakings should establish whether reinsurance contracts and securitization vehicles behave differently from the undertaking's insurance policies across a full range of risk scenarios due to different terms. Undertakings should consider that basis risk resulting from currency asymmetry is significant if the exposure covered by the insurance risk mitigation technique is denominated in a currency other than that of the undertaking's risk exposure, unless the currencies concerned fluctuate within a sufficiently narrow band or a fixed exchange rate is provided for in the reinsurance contract.

Circular – Page 4/4 NBB_2016_14 – 25 April 2016 If there is significant basis risk arising from currency asymmetry, as indicated in the previous paragraph, undertakings should not take into account the risk mitigation technique in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement, unless the provisions of Article 86 of Regulation 2015/35 are applicable. A copy of this circular is sent to the commissioner(s), approved auditor(s) of your undertaking. We ask you to accept, Madam, Sir, the expression of our distinguished sentiments. Jan Smets Governor