2018-06-21
Added · Updated
Financial institutions must perform customer due diligence on foundations pursuant to Section 3(1) and (2) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act to identify customers and ultimate beneficial owners. Institutions are required to collect and regularly update specific information, including the foundation's name, registration details, address, control structure, and documentary evidence of board member identity. This data must be used to conduct a risk assessment and integrate the findings into the institution's systematic integrity risk analysis, with heightened monitoring measures applied for higher-risk profiles.
Q&A
Read aloud
Question:
How must financial institutions perform customer due diligence (CDD) on foundations to mitigate the risks related to terrorist financing?
Published: 21 June 2018
Latest update: 24 November 2022
Answer:
Terrorist attacks cause great social unrest at home and abroad. As a result, terrorist financing is still a prominent item on the agendas of supervisory authorities such as DNB. Abuse of financial institutions to finance terrorist organisations or attacks must be prevented, so financial institutions must always be alert to customers and transactions or financial flows that could indicate terrorist financing.
Charity foundations are crucial for providing humanitarian help to people in need. However, there are strong indications that terrorists and terrorist organisations are abusing these organisations to finance their activities. Gaining an understanding of the risks and adequately monitoring the financial flows of such organisations is not only essential, but must be a regular component of a financial institution's sound and ethical operational management.
To gain that understanding, financial institutions must carry out customer due diligence pursuant to Section 3(1) and (2) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act (Wet ter voorkoming van witwassen en financieren van terrorisme – Wwft) and identify the customer and the ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs). In the case of foundations, identification and verification are relevant (1) if the customer is a foundation, (2) if the customer's ultimate beneficial owner is a foundation, or (3) if a representative acts on a foundation's behalf (and the foundation is the customer). As a minimum, institutions should use the following information to perform CDD on foundations and update it on a regular basis to identify the integrity risks related to foundations:
Name of the foundation
Date of establishment and country of registration (also for foreign foundations or a legal entity comparable to a foundation)
Official identifier code (e.g. Chamber of Commerce registration number)
The UBOs’ registration in the UBO register of the Chamber of Commerce
Registered business address
Postal address (if different)
Head office (if different)
Control structure and information on the UBOs. In practice this will most often be the foundation’s board members, but it could also be senior staff or representatives. For example, a treasurer with control over the foundation's financial flows. The foundation's articles of association are a key instrument in charting such information.
Documentary evidence establishing and verifying the identity of the foundation's board members who are authorised to represent the foundation or to transfer funds or assets of the foundation (control)
Type of foundation – charitable or other
Nature of the foundation's activities
Foundation's geographical area of operation
This will allow the institution to carry out a risk assessment of the foundations in question. Depending on the foundation’s risk profile, it can request additional information if necessary and take further mitigating measures, especially in the case of heightened risk. Such measures may include adjusting the frequency of its ongoing monitoring and keeping the above information updated, but may also pertain to the intensity of transaction monitoring. It is the institution's responsibility to take measures that match its customers' risk profiles.
An integrity risk analysis based on the risk profiles of the foundations in the institution's customer base must be part of the institution's systematic integrity risk analysis (SIRA).
More information
International organisations such as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) have issued guidelines on customer due diligence procedures, including for foundations, and on adequately assessing risks. In February 2016 for example, the BCBS published guidelines on the Sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (amended in July 2020). The FATF published a best practices document about dealing with non-profit organisations (NPOs) including foundations, with a description of the types of NPOs that are likely to be abused for terrorist financing purposes.
Click here to consult the best practices document
Gerelateerde wet- en regelgeving
Art. 3 Wwft (Refers to an external site)
Share:
Share on LinkedIn
Share on X
Share on Facebook
Share via Email
Interesting articles
Fine for CCV Group B.V. for lack of SIRA
21 July 2026
Enforcement measures
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) discloses its decision of 9 July 2020 to impose an administrative fine on CCV Group B.V. (CCV). DNB also discloses its decisions on CCV’s objection of 13 April 2022 and CCV’s subsequent appeal and higher appeal.
Read more Fine for CCV Group B.V. for lack of SIRA
Enforcement measures
21 July 2026
Prudential rules do not hinder bank financing for EU priorities
17 July 2026
News item supervision
Europe faces historic investment challenges, in which banks will play an important financing role. Prudential requirements strengthen banks’ resilience, without posing a major obstacle to their financing. Unlocking more private finance requires better risk-sharing and deeper financial integration.
Read more Prudential rules do not hinder bank financing for EU priorities
News item supervision
17 July 2026
DNB Inhouse Day for the Dutch banking sector: financial crime supervision
16 July 2026
News item supervision
Following last year’s successful event, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) will again host an Inhouse Day for AML/CFT professionals in the Dutch banking sector. The event is designed to encourage dialogue and provide further insight into DNB’s AML/CFT supervision.
Read more DNB Inhouse Day for the Dutch banking sector: financial crime supervision
News item supervision
16 July 2026
Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years
15 July 2026
News item supervision
Dutch insurers and pension funds are investing more and more in private assets, such as private equity and private credit. By 2025, they had a combined total of €276 billion worth of these investments on their books.
Read more Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years
News item supervision
15 July 2026
Necessary cookies
To ensure the proper operation of the website, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) uses functional cookies and analytics cookies, and has taken measures to ensure that these cookies have little or no impact on the privacy of website users.
Optional cookies
Some pages include embedded content from external websites. These websites may use proprietary (tracking) cookies. This allows third parties to track visitor statistics, show personalised content and display targeted ads, for example.
You can make your choice about allowing these optional cookies both when you first visit the website and when you navigate to a page with embedded content.