2017-02-01
Added · Updated
The Bank of Israel establishes Directive no. 450, requiring banking corporations and credit-card companies to create a dedicated debt collection function managed by an executive, with oversight by senior management and the Board of Directors. The Directive caps penalty interest rates at the maximum rate charged for exceeding credit facilities in current or overdraft accounts and mandates transparent disclosure of interest formulas and indexation mechanisms in loan agreements. It regulates the frequency of notices, ensures customer access to account information and debt settlement copies, and imposes strict reporting, monitoring, and auditing obligations on banks regarding their agents and Execution Office proceedings. The Directive repeals Directive no. 409 and applies to loans issued before its effective date of February 1, 2017, for actions taken thereafter.
Get BOI alerts — same-day email on every new publication.
Bank of Israel
Banking Supervision Department
Bank-Customer Division
Regulation (Bank-Customer) Unit
February 1, 2017
Circular no. C-06-2527
Attn:
Banking corporations and credit-card companies Re: Debt Collection Proceedings (Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive no. 450) Introduction
process. It is stated for clarity that the Directive does not rule out the existence of several debtcollection functions, each dedicated to a different activity segment.
3. Sections 10–11 of the Directive determine the maximum penalty interest rate and the indexation
mechanism of a loan. According to these sections, the penalty interest rate on a loan at the time the loan is taken shall not exceed the maximum interest rate that the banking corporation charges for exceeding the credit facility in a current/overdraft account, in accordance with the banking corporation’s notice about changes in credit cost under Addendum B of the Banking (Customer Service) (Proper Disclosure and Presentation of Documents), 5752-1992. Insofar as further law exists in this matter, the penalty interest rate shall be the lower of the two. It is also determined that a banking corporation shall have control neither over setting the base interest rate that is used to calculate the penalty interest formula nor over the indexation base; instead, both shall be based on a benchmark that is made known to the public under law or by custom. Explanation The interest cap is meant to prevent a state of uncertainty surrounding the interest rate that a banking corporation may charge. Said maximum interest rate must be transparent and accessible to the customer and shall be determined in accordance with the definition of the customer with the banking corporation as private or business. For credit-card companies, the maximum rate shall be set at the maximum interest rate charged by the parent corporation.
4. Sections 12–13 of the Directive concern requisite proper disclosure to the customer and
determine that a banking corporation must note, in the loan agreement or in a complementary document (hereinafter: the loan agreement) the formula used to calculate the penalty interest rate on the loan and the indexation mechanism. Furthermore, the banking corporation must, to the best of its ability, advise the customer of the possible implications of delinquency for him or her, in ample time for him or her to be able to avoid this outcome. When a settlement between the parties is executed, a banking corporation shall note its possible implications for the customer and shall give him or her a copy of the settlement after he or she signs it. Explanation To ensure that when a customer takes a loan he or she is aware of the penalty interest rate and the possible financial implications for him or her of failure to make systematic payback, a banking corporation must disclose to the customer at the initial stage of the relationship, i.e., in the loan agreement, the formula that it used to calculate the penalty interest rate on the loan. In cases where the balance in a current account that lacks an approved and agreed-upon credit facility becomes negative for an unpreventable reason, said proper disclosure shall take place by means of a notice to the customer about the overrun. Furthermore, given the possible future implications of delinquency, it is important to disclose said implications to the customer in good time so that he or she may consider what to do and take appropriate actions. At the time a settlement is drawn up, too, it is important to advise the customer of its possible implications for him or her, e.g., those concerning the possibility of renewing bank–customer relations in the future. It is also determined that the customer must be given a copy of the debt settlement, insofar as the parties sign one, in order to ensure certainty and transparency in regard to its terms.
Explanation
It is determined that the date of a payment that is made for the purpose of retiring or reducing the customer’s debt shall be the determining date in debt-collection proceedings. This is meant to prevent a situation in which a debtor who is paying off his or her debt is forced to pay an additional sum because of lack of update as aforesaid. Additionally, the Directive mentions two events of special importance to a customer who is in the midst of a debt-collection proceeding: drawing up a settlement and repaying the debt in full. For the customer to be able to plan his or her steps optimally, she or he must be shown not only the balance of the debt as recorded in the bank’s books but also information about said balance in accordance with the latest records at the Execution Office. The banking corporation shall present this information as well except in cases of technical mishaps that render said information inaccessible. The information shall be given to the customer at no charge because it is accessible to the banking corporation as the creditor and does not entail any payment whatsoever. Furthermore, to allow the customer to check the way the debt was calculated, the banking corporation, on the aforementioned dates, shall present the customer, at his or her request, with a breakdown of the method used to calculate the debt.
8. Sections 22–24 of the Directive regulate banking corporations’ conduct in Execution Office
proceedings.
Explanation
The penalty interest rate that the banking corporation reports to the Execution Office shall accord with the penalty interest rate that appears in the loan agreement or in a court order. Additionally, when a banking corporation applies to the Execution Office to open a file, it shall attach to its application a copy of the loan agreement, the court order, or the document, as the case may be, with clear reference to the sections that specify the relevant penalty interest formula and indexation mechanism. If support documentation for the penalty interest formula or the indexation mechanism is lacking, the banking corporation may present an institutional record concerning these details in accordance with the terms established by law. To eliminate doubt, it is explained that this provision also applies to loans taken before this Directive goes into effect and for which Bailiffs Office proceedings are launched after the Directive goes into effect, even if the loan agreement does not specify the penalty interest formula and the indexation mechanism. In these cases, the banking corporation shall specify in its application to open the Execution Office file the formula used to calculate the penalty interest and the indexation mechanism, and shall attach support literature in respect thereto. It is also determined that a banking corporation must monitor the opening of Execution Office files against customers and ensure that the data in the files are correct.
9. Sections 25–26 of the Directive determine compulsory reporting by a banking corporation to
the Execution Office about sums received by the banking corporation on account of debts by means other than the Execution Office, and the execution of an arrangement with a customer concerning the receipt of sums by means other than the Execution Office and sums received within the framework of the arrangement.
Explanation
The requirements in reporting to the Execution Office as established in this Directive resemble those set forth in this matter under the Execution Office Law, 5727-1967. In this Directive, however, compulsory reporting is extended to receipts obtained under an arrangement concluded between a banking corporation and a customer within seven days of the day of receipt. Also, banking corporations are required to advise the Execution Office of an arrangement concluded with a customer within a reasonable time of its being signed, in order to ensure that sanctions are not brought against the debtor within the framework of the Execution Office file as long as he or she honors the arrangement. To eliminate doubt, it is explain that said compulsory reporting in these sections applies to receipts obtained both by the banking corporation and by means of its agent. Insofar as the banking corporation avails itself of an agent to carry out the reportage, its responsibility to ensure that said reportage is in compliance with the Directive is even greater.
10. Sections 27–31 of the Directive define the supervision and control measures that a banking
corporation must take vis-à-vis its agents.
Explanation
In these sections, it is determined that a banking corporation must impose supervision and control over agents whom it appoints to begin collection proceedings against a client. It shall do so, inter alia, by documenting instructions that it presents to its agents and by staying abreast of actions taken against customers. It is also determined that a banking corporation must take appropriate actions to keep itself apprised of all material information that the customer gives its agent, including a request by the customer to settle a debt in arrears, so that it may examine the customer’s request on its merits. A banking corporation shall produce an annual report about customer debts that it has handed over to its agents for treatment, in order to allow said debts to be monitored and to ensure that their collection has been handled appropriately. At least once every three years, a banking corporation shall audit each agent that it has appointed to deal with debt collection by means of an external CPA or an internal auditor, and shall present said audit report to the debt-collection function. A condensed presentation of the findings of the annual reports, audit reports, and actions taken shall be inserted into the function’s periodic report to the management of the banking corporation.
11. Sections 32–34 of the Directive regulate the fee that a banking corporation’s agent may charge
for legal proceedings and other legal expenses, and refer to compulsory disclosure of the fee in the event of the conclusion of a compromise settlement. Explanation The matter of the fee that a banking corporation’s agent may charge when it launches legal proceedings found expression in Proper Conduct of Banking Business Directive no. 409 and is inserted into the Directive presented herewith. It is also determined that a banking corporation must specify the fee of its agent and/or that of a receiver within the framework of a compromise settlement, which must be presented to the customer before she or he signs it.
Read the rest free
Source: Bank of Israel — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from BOI
We email you every new BOI publication the day it's published.