2022-05-17
The Reserve Bank of New Zealand issues Statement of Principles BS1 to define the regulatory framework for bank registration and prudential supervision under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. The document mandates that systemically important banks with New Zealand liabilities exceeding NZD 15 billion must incorporate locally, while retail deposit takers face strict requirements regarding home jurisdiction disclosure and creditor priority laws. It further establishes capital thresholds, ownership structure assessments, and crisis management protocols to maintain financial system soundness and minimize damage from potential bank failures.
Ref #5301831 Statement of Principles Bank Registration and Supervision Prudential Supervision Department Document BS1 Issued: XX 2013 Deleted: January
2 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January TABLE OF CONTENTS Subject Page A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3 B. PURPOSES OF BANK REGISTRATION AND SUPERVISION..................................... 3 C. BANK REGISTRATION.................................................................................................... 4 D. SUPERVISION.................................................................................................................. 20 E. CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION............................................................................... 22 F. VARIATION AND REMOVAL OF CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION................... 30 G. BREACHES OF CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION................................................... 31 H. BREACH OF MINIMUM CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO REQUIREMENTS........... 31 I. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS................................................................................... 32 J. CREDIT RATING REQUIREMENT ............................................................................... 33 K. RESPONSIBILITIES FOR NEW ZEALAND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OVERSEAS INCORPORATED BANKS........................................................................ 34 L. DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................... 35 M. CHANGES OF OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................... 35 N. ESTABLISHMENT OF OVERSEAS BRANCHES, REPRESENTATIVE OFFICES OR SUBSIDIARIES ......................................................................................................... 37 O. CRISIS MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 37 P. FOREIGN SUPERVISOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION HELD BY REGISTERED BANKS ............................................................................................................................. 41 Q. UNITED NATIONS’ SANCTIONS ................................................................................. 42 APPENDIX ONE – STANDARD CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION............................... 43 APPENDIX TWO – CREDIT RATING REQUIREMENT ..................................................... 57 APPENDIX THREE – APPROVAL OF CREDIT RATING AGENCIES .............................. 58
3 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES – BANK REGISTRATION AND SUPERVISION A. INTRODUCTION
4 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January management powers available under the Act. These crisis management powers include the ability to place a registered bank under statutory management and the ability to give directions to a registered bank that is in difficulties. C. BANK REGISTRATION 8. The following section sets out the principles on which the Reserve Bank will act when determining applications for registration as a registered bank. The Reserve Bank document entitled “Application for Status as a Registered Bank: Material to be Provided to the Reserve Bank” (BS3) identifies the information which should be provided in support of an application to become a registered bank. 9. In terms of section 73 of the Act, when determining an application for registration as a registered bank, the Reserve Bank is required:
5 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
6 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 18. The Reserve Bank has not attempted to define ‘financial’ or ‘non-financial’ business or services, as it recognises that the types of services provided by banks evolve and develop over time. However, when considering whether or not a particular service is ‘financial’, it will have regard to the types of services commonly offered by banks in New Zealand and in other similar countries. (II) Incorporation and ownership structure 19. The Reserve Bank seeks to ensure that a registered bank is in the ownership of entities or individuals who collectively have incentives to monitor its activities closely and to influence its behaviour in a way which will improve or maintain its soundness. Such incentives are most likely to be present when the owners as a group have made a substantial financial commitment to the bank, and where the form of that commitment is such that they will be the first to absorb any losses which arise as a result of poor performance. The owners' incentives are likely to be further enhanced where there is potential for their reputation to be adversely affected by any problems which become evident in the bank. 20. In addition, there will need to be sufficient separation between the board of a bank and its owners to ensure that the board does not have an unfettered ability to act in the interests of the owners where those interests diverge from those of the bank. 21. The Reserve Bank will assess ownership structures in the light of these factors. 22. As noted above, both locally incorporated entities and branches of banks incorporated overseas may apply for registration. 23. The requirements which will apply to applicants wishing to operate a branch are as follows: (a) Branches of overseas banks 24. Where an applicant wishes to register as a branch of an overseas incorporated entity, that entity will need to have bank status in its home jurisdiction. 25. All applicants which fall within the following categories, or which are expected to fall within the following categories in the 5 years following registration, will be required to establish a locally incorporated entity rather than operate via a branch:
7 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
8 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 32. Where disclosure in the home jurisdiction is inadequate, depositors have no way of assessing the financial strength of the bank as a whole and the likelihood of the bank failing. In such circumstances the effectiveness of market disciplines may be undermined. 33. When assessing the adequacy of disclosure, the Reserve Bank will take into consideration the following:
9 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January will not require applicants which deal with wholesale clients to incorporate locally purely on the basis of inadequate disclosure or depositor preference legislation. 36. With a locally incorporated bank, depositors will have access to current financial statements prepared in accordance with New Zealand generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for the legal entity with which they are dealing and assurance that, in a winding up, their claims would rank pari passu with those of other unsecured creditors (other than priority creditors such as the Inland Revenue Department and employees). 37. Other applicants In assessing the adequacy of supervision in the home jurisdiction, the Reserve Bank will pay close attention to the adequacy of capital standards applied in the home country. 38. Applicants which wish to operate as a branch of an overseas bank will also need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that the operations of the New Zealand branch will not constitute a predominant proportion of the business of the global bank. 39. Dual registration Overseas banks may be permitted to have dual registration (ie to operate both a branch and a subsidiary in New Zealand) provided both entities comply with relevant prudential requirements relating to the matters that the Reserve Bank is required to have regard to when assessing an application. Banks with dual registration will not be permitted to take retail deposits through the branch operation. If banks with a dual registration were able to take deposits through both entities it is likely that depositors would be confused about which entity they were dealing with. (b) Locally incorporated applicants 40. Application for registration as a locally incorporated entity may be made by companies which are in widespread ownership, or which are wholly or substantially owned by corporates, trusts or another bank. 41. Locally incorporated entities will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that a substantial proportion of their business will be conducted in and from New Zealand. (c) Other forms of ownership 42. While the Reserve Bank would not rule out the possibility of entities with other forms of ownership becoming registered banks, such entities would need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that the degree of separation between ownership and management is sufficient to ensure that checks and balances are adequate and that appropriate incentive structures apply.
10 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (III) Size and nature of business or proposed business, or any part of the business or proposed business 43. A locally incorporated bank will be required to have a minimum of NZD $30 million in capital. This minimum capital requirement is intended to ensure that an applicant has sufficient substance to carry on business as a registered bank and to demonstrate that the owners have made a reasonable commitment to the business. 44. Branches of overseas banks will not be subject to a minimum size requirement, in recognition of the fact that a branch will be operating on the basis of the global bank's balance sheet. However, in such cases the Reserve Bank will wish to satisfy itself that the global bank has a level of capital which exceeds NZD $30 million. 45. Restrictions on retail deposit taking will be imposed on some overseas incorporated banks. (See paragraphs 30 – 36) 46. Overseas incorporated banks which provide inadequate disclosure in their home jurisdiction or which come from a jurisdiction that has legislation that gives deposits made, or credit conferred, in that jurisdiction a preferential claim in a winding up, will not be permitted to take retail deposits of more than $200 million. (IV) Ability of the applicant to carry on business in a prudent manner 47. In having regard to whether or not an applicant for registration has the ability to carry on business in a prudent manner, the Reserve Bank is required to confine its consideration to the following matters: (a) capital in relation to the size and nature of the business; (b) loan concentration and risk exposures; (c) separation of the business from other interests of those who own or control the bank; (d) separation of the business or proposed business from other business; (e) internal controls and accounting systems; (f) risk management systems and policies; (g) arrangements for any business, or functions relating to any business, of the applicant to be carried on by any person other than the applicant (outsourcing); (h) such other matters as may, from time to time, be prescribed in regulations.
11 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January The following sections expand on items (a) to (h). (a) Capital in relation to size and nature of business 48. An applicant must satisfy the Reserve Bank that it is able, on an ongoing basis, to meet the capital requirements that would be imposed as conditions of registration. An applicant will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that it has sufficient capital to carry on its business in a prudent manner and that it is able to maintain a prudent level of capital both on a solo and a group basis. 48A. An applicant’s capital requirements must be calculated under one of two broad approaches available under the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework. The first approach is the standardised approach and is set out in the Reserve Bank’s “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A). This approach uses external credit assessments produced by approved credit rating agencies and is the default approach. The second approach permits an applicant’s internal models to be used to measure the risks of their business and is set out in “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Approach)” (BS2B). This second approach is only available to the extent the Reserve Bank accredits the applicant to use the models based approach. 48B. An applicant must have a capital policy. A capital policy must take into account any constraints on access to further capital when needed to cater for situations including, for example, an increase in business or an unexpected loss. In addition, an applicant must satisfy the Reserve Bank that it has the capacity to implement and manage an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the Reserve Bank’s “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process” (BS12). 49. For a locally incorporated bank the capital requirements that would generally be imposed are set out in the Reserve Bank’s standard conditions of registration in Appendix One. In some cases, however, higher than usual minimum requirements may be imposed to mitigate higher than usual risks. 50. For a branch of a bank incorporated overseas, an applicant will have to demonstrate to the Reserve Bank that the global bank complies with adequate capital standards, which are at least broadly comparable with those in New Zealand, and that it is subject to adequate supervision by the bank’s home supervisor. 51. An applicant will be required to show that it has the ability to disclose capital adequacy information on its parent or the global bank. (b) Loan concentration and risk exposures 52. Banks that do not have a diversified portfolio of risks or do not monitor risks adequately, are vulnerable to substantial losses. In such cases the bank’s capital can be severely depleted as a result either of the failure of a single customer (or group of related customers) or of problems arising in one particular area of the bank’s business. Therefore, applicants for registration will be required to demonstrate that they will have in place policies and systems which will allow them to monitor and control loan concentrations and risk exposures in a manner which is appropriate for a bank, and that they will be able to
12 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January comply with the exposure concentration disclosure and director attestation requirements applicable to registered banks. 53. In assessing the appropriateness of policies and systems for controlling loan concentrations and risk exposures, the Reserve Bank will have regard to the extent to which various aspects of risk will be diversified. (c) Separation from other interests of the owners 54. Boards of banks have an important role to play in ensuring that bank managers are monitored closely and that they are subject to appropriate disciplines and incentives. The shareholders or owners of a bank play an important role in monitoring the board and in monitoring the bank’s performance. Where there is inadequate separation between a bank's board and its principal shareholders, these incentives and disciplines may be undermined. 55. Where the applicant is a branch of an overseas bank, the local operations are legally part of the operations of the global bank. Consequently, it is not meaningful to attempt to impose a degree of separation between the two. Therefore a branch will not be required to comply with the separation arrangements that apply to locally incorporated banks. 56. Where the applicant is a locally incorporated company, the applicant will be required to satisfy the Reserve Bank that there will be sufficient separation between the bank and its owners. Generally this will require:
13 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January qualify as independent, provided that the applicant is able to satisfy the Reserve Bank that the chairperson will be sufficiently independent from the parent bank in practice.
14 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January activities of borrowing and lending, and to the provision of treasury and payments services, and related financial services. Were material insurance underwriting activities or non financial activities to be conducted by banking groups, the accuracy and integrity of capital adequacy measures, and the meaningfulness and comparability of disclosures would be materially degraded. 61. Where the applicant is a locally incorporated company, the applicant will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that it will be in a position to comply with conditions of registration:
15 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January policies used by the parent may be accepted as evidence that the requirement can be met. Similarly, a financial institution’s successful operation for some time may be accepted as evidence of ability to meet the requirement. 66. If the applicant intends to operate in areas where it lacks experience or if there are doubts about the adequacy of its risk management systems and policies, the Reserve Bank may require the applicant to obtain a report from an independent expert on the adequacy of its risk management systems and policies, and to supply that report to the Reserve Bank. In such cases, the Bank may also take into account arrangements designed to mitigate risk arising from unproven systems and controls or other factors, including adequacy of capital in light of these risks. The Reserve Bank may impose higher capital adequacy ratio requirements by way of a condition of registration in order to mitigate any increased risk where individual circumstances warrant. 66A. In relation to liquidity risk, the applicant will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that it will be able to comply with conditions of registration imposing minimum requirements on the applicant’s liquidity risk management framework, as set out in the Reserve Bank document “Liquidity Policy” (BS13). 67. If the application for registration is successful, the registered bank’s directors will be required regularly to attest in disclosure statements to the adequacy of the registered bank’s systems to monitor and control material business risks. (g) Outsourcing 68. Outsourcing can have a positive impact on a bank’s efficiency, risk management and profitability and may allow it to access specialist expertise not available from within its own ranks. On the other hand, it can also increase the risk and possible magnitude of damage to the financial system in the event that the bank, or a service provider to the bank, should fail or become dysfunctional. 69. Where relevant, applicants for registration will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they will be able to comply with the Reserve Bank’s outsourcing policy which is described in the Reserve Bank document “Outsourcing Policy” (BS11). 70. Applicants for registration whose New Zealand liabilities, net of amounts due to related parties, exceed NZD $10 billion will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they have the legal and practical ability to control and execute any business, and any functions relating to any business, of the applicant that are carried on by a person other than the applicant, sufficient to achieve, under normal business conditions and in the event of stress or failure of the applicant or of a service provider to the applicant, the following outcomes: (a) that the applicant’s clearing and settlement obligations due on a day can be met on that day; (b) that the applicant’s financial risk positions on a day can be identified on that day;
16 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (c) that the applicant’s financial risk positions can be monitored and managed on the day following any failure and on subsequent days; and (d) that the applicant’s existing customers can be given access to payments facilities on the day following any failure and on subsequent days. 71. Such applicants will also need to satisfy the Reserve Bank: (a) that the business and affairs of the applicant are managed by, or under the direction or supervision of, the board of the applicant; (b) that the employment contract of the chief executive officer of the applicant or person in an equivalent position (together “CEO”) is with the applicant, and the terms and conditions of the CEO’s employment agreement are determined by, and any decisions relating to the employment or termination of employment of the CEO are made by, the board of the applicant; and (c) that all staff employed by the applicant have their remuneration determined by (or under the delegated authority of) the board or the CEO of the applicant and are accountable (directly or indirectly) to the CEO of the applicant. (h) Such other matters as may, from time to time, be prescribed in regulations 71A Currently there is one matter prescribed in regulation. This matter is policies, systems, and procedures to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing. 71B. Applicants will be required to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they have, or will have, policies, systems and procedures, to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing that are consistent with the Reserve Bank’s “Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism” (BS5). (V) Suitability for their positions of the directors and senior managers 72. The Reserve Bank will have regard to the suitability of the applicant’s proposed directors and senior management for their positions. The standard considerations are: (a) Integrity. The Reserve Bank will assess the integrity of directors and senior managers by— (i) seeking the views of foreign banking regulators where the person has been resident in a foreign country and has been subject to a suitability check by the foreign regulator; and (ii) reviewing the New Zealand criminal record information of the person where they have been resident in New Zealand. (iii) reviewing the criminal record information of the person in other jurisdictions in which the person has been resident, where necessary.
17 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (b) Skills and experience. The applicant will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that key executives have suitable expertise and experience to manage a registered bank, that the bank’s board collectively has the range of experience and skills to govern a registered bank, and that the directors and senior managers have sufficient skills and experience in the activities that the applicant proposes to undertake. Because it is impractical for each director individually to be an expert in all relevant areas, the skills and experience of directors will be assessed collectively. This evaluation of skills and experience will involve reviewing directors’ and senior managers’ curricula vitae. 73. The Reserve Bank may take into consideration other information if relevant. 74. If a proposed director or senior manager has already passed a foreign banking regulator’s suitability assessment, the Reserve Bank will usually accept that assessment as evidence of suitability. 75. ‘Senior managers’ are defined as the chief executive officer and executives accountable directly to the chief executive officer for locally incorporated banks, and the New Zealand chief executive officer for overseas incorporated banks. 76. The Reserve Bank does some basic checks on whether or not there is any evidence to suggest that proposed directors or senior managers are not suitable for their positions, but does not give a positive affirmation of suitability. The primary responsibility for ensuring that appointees have the requisite skills, experience, and integrity to carry out their tasks successfully lies with the shareholders (for director appointments) and with the board (for senior management appointments), not with the Reserve Bank. (VI) Standing of the applicant in financial markets 77. An applicant’s status as a branch or subsidiary of a major international bank of standing and repute with a record of sound performance will normally be accepted as evidence of an appropriate degree of standing. 78. When the applicant is not a branch or subsidiary of a reputable bank, additional emphasis will be placed on the suitability of directors and senior management for their positions (see section C(V)) in assessing the standing of the applicant in financial markets. 79. All applicants must obtain a credit rating before registration. This is to assist the Reserve Bank in assessing the applicant’s standing and to ensure that the applicant is in a position to include a rating in their initial disclosure statement. 80. Applicants must obtain their credit rating from a rating agency approved by the Reserve Bank for the purposes of section 80 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. These agencies are Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service. Applicants may only use another rating agency with the agreement of the Reserve Bank. In such cases, the Reserve Bank must first be satisfied that the rating agency meets the criteria set out in Appendix Three.
18 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (VII) Standing of the owner of the applicant in financial markets 81. The standing of the owner of the applicant in financial markets is likely to have a significant impact on the standing of the applicant itself. 82. Where an applicant is owned by a major international bank of standing and repute, it is likely that the Reserve Bank will accept this as evidence that the applicant has an appropriate level of standing for a registered bank. 83. Where the applicant is a subsidiary or branch of an overseas bank, the Reserve Bank will seek the views of the parent supervisor before determining the application for registration. 84. In all cases, the Reserve Bank will take into consideration any impediments to the raising of further capital which arise as a result of the standing of the owner and the applicant's ownership structure. (VIII) For an overseas applicant, the law and regulatory requirements of the home jurisdiction relating to:
19 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (X) For a subsidiary of an overseas person, the law and regulatory requirements of the overseas person’s home jurisdiction relating to:
20 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January D. SUPERVISION 93. To the extent possible, the Reserve Bank's system of supervision draws on and enhances the market disciplines which are naturally present in the financial system. 94. As a consequence, the Reserve Bank's system of supervision places considerable emphasis on a requirement that banks disclose on a quarterly basis, information on financial performance and risk positions, and on a requirement that directors, and in the case of an overseas incorporated registered bank, its New Zealand chief executive officer, regularly attest to certain key matters. These measures are designed to strengthen market disciplines and to ensure that responsibility for the prudent management of banks lies with those who are best placed to exercise that responsibility, the directors and management. 95. The main elements of the Reserve Bank's supervisory role are as follows: (i) The Reserve Bank administers disclosure and director attestation requirements for registered banks. (ii) All banks are required to comply with minimum prudential requirements applied through conditions of registration. These include constraints on connected exposure, minimum capital adequacy requirements, and minimum standards for liquidity risk management. (iii) The Reserve Bank monitors each registered bank's financial condition and compliance with conditions of registration, principally by analysing published disclosure statements and prudential returns that are regularly provided to the Bank. This monitoring is intended to ensure that the Reserve Bank maintains familiarity with the financial condition of each bank and the banking system as a whole, and maintains a state of preparedness to invoke crisis management powers should this be necessary. (iv) In this context, the Reserve Bank meets to discuss matters of prudential interest with the senior management of banks on a regular basis. (v) The Reserve Bank carries out basic pre-appointment suitability checks on proposed directors or senior managers, including a review of the applicant’s CV, criminal record checks and checks with other relevant regulators. However, primary responsibility for ensuring that appointees have the requisite skills and integrity to carry out their tasks successfully lies with the shareholders (for director appointments) and with the board (for senior management appointments). (va) The Reserve Bank is able to issue guidelines for banks under section 78(3) of the Act. The Act provides for guidelines to be issued for the purposes interpreting the matters the Reserve Bank may consider when having regard to whether a bank is carrying on business in a prudent manner. These matters are set out in paragraph 47 of this document.
21 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (vb) The Reserve Bank “Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism” (BS5) were issued under section 78(3) of the Act. The Reserve Bank expects banks to have policies, systems and procedures, to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing that are consistent with these guidelines. (vc) The Reserve Bank “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Process (“ICAAP”)” (BS12) were issued under section 78(3) of the Act. These guidelines apply to any New Zealand-incorporated registered bank that is subject to a condition of registration requiring it to have an ICAAP, and provide guidance on how a bank should establish, operate and maintain its ICAAP. (vd) Section D.2 of the Reserve Bank document “Liquidity Policy” (BS13) contains guidelines issued under section 78(3) of the Act. These guidelines cover the factors that a registered bank should consider when deciding on its arrangements for liquidity-risk management, subject to their relevance given the nature of the bank’s business and risks. (ve) Part 3 of the Reserve Bank document “Corporate Governance” (BS14) contains guidelines issued under section 78(3) of the Act. These guidelines address the skills, experience and personal qualities of the individual directors of a registered bank in relation to the board’s ability collectively to exercise effective governance of the bank. (vi) The Bank may make use of the powers it has under sections 93, 94, and 95 of the Act:
22 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (vii) The Bank will use the crisis management powers available to it under the Reserve Bank Act to intervene where a bank distress or failure situation threatens the soundness of the financial system. (viii) The Bank maintains close working relationships with parent bank supervisors on bank-specific issues, policy issues and general matters relating to the condition of the financial system in New Zealand and in the countries where parent banks are domiciled. Where New Zealand domiciled banks have branches or subsidiaries in overseas jurisdictions similar arrangements will apply in respect of host supervisors. E. CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION 96. Section 74 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 permits the Reserve Bank to impose conditions on a bank’s registration. 97. Standard conditions of registration are set out in Appendix One. These should be treated as indicative of the conditions that could apply to any particular bank at a particular time. Although the Reserve Bank uses the standard conditions as far as practicable, in some circumstances different or additional conditions may be imposed to recognise, for example, specific banking group structures or risks. 97A. Further, the standard conditions include two mechanisms to implement the Reserve Bank’s macro-prudential toolkit. Hence the actual conditions applying to an individual bank at a point in time depend on whether the Reserve Bank has deployed one of those tools. For locally incorporated banks, the Reserve Bank may implement the countercyclical buffer if it judges that there is a build up of system-wide risk (see paragraphs 102C-D). For both locally incorporated banks and overseas incorporated banks the standard conditions include three conditions restricting high loan-to-valuation ratio (LVR) residential mortgage lending. The Reserve Bank may impose these conditions from time to time across all banks, when it judges that factors such as rapid price rises and loosening credit standards in the housing market are leading to a build-up of system-wide risk. The decision to impose these conditions, and subsequently to vary or remove them, are taken within the decision-making process set out in the Reserve Bank’s macroprudential policy framework. 98. A bank’s actual conditions of registration must be made publicly available in the bank’s disclosure statements: the full year disclosure statement must include the full set of conditions that applied at the balance date, and other disclosure statements must report any changes in the conditions between the reporting dates of the current and the previous disclosure statement. This requirement is intended to help enhance public understanding of the requirements of registration. Moreover, directors must also attest to the bank’s compliance with its conditions of registration each quarter. For an overseas incorporated registered bank, this attestation must also be made by the New Zealand chief executive officer. The attestation requirements are designed to reinforce the responsibility of directors for ensuring a bank complies with its conditions of registration. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 cm, Hanging: 1.25 cm, No bullets or numbering, Tab stops: Not at 1.25 cm Formatted: Font color: Black Formatted: Condensed by 0.15 pt
23 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 99. The Reserve Bank may consider and have regard to the whole of this Statement of Principles when imposing a condition of registration (whether on registration or subsequently). 100. The banking group will normally be defined in the conditions of registration as the financial reporting group for the registered bank, although the Reserve Bank may agree to, or require, the inclusion or exclusion of any entity or part of any entity. 101. In addition to the requirements imposed on a bank in relation to its banking group, requirements may also be imposed on the bank on a solo (i.e. stand alone) basis. For example, a solo capital requirement could be imposed to counter double gearing. (I) Locally incorporated banks 102A. Under a bank’s conditions of registration capital requirements may be determined under one of two possible approaches: the standardised approach or the internal models based approach. The internal models based approach only applies to the extent the Reserve Bank accredits a bank to use it. The details of these approaches are set out in the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework: in documents BS2A for the standardised approach and BS2B for the internal models based approach. 102B. Locally-incorporated banks are subject to minimum capital requirements as set out in their conditions of registration. These requirements take the form of minimum capital ratios (i.e. capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets). In addition to minimum capital requirements, a locally-incorporated bank is required to restrict the distribution of its earnings if its buffer ratio falls below a defined level (the buffer ratio is a capital buffer over and above the minimum capital ratio requirements). 102C. The buffer ratio comprises a conservation buffer of common equity designed so that banks can absorb losses during periods of financial and economic stress without breaching the minimum capital ratio requirements, and also potentially a countercyclical buffer of common equity to accommodate a system-wide build up of risk. 102D. The conservation buffer applies at all times and is set at 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. However, the countercyclical buffer will only be deployed when the Reserve Bank judges that excess private sector credit growth or rapid growth in asset prices is leading to a build-up of system-wide risk. For the purposes of a bank’s conditions of registration, the countercyclical capital buffer is treated as an extension of the conservation buffer and a single buffer ratio is applied. 102E. A locally-incorporated registered bank must have an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the Reserve Bank’s “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process” (BS12). 103. Appendix One sets out standard conditions of registration for locally incorporated banks. A locally incorporated bank will normally be subject to these conditions, with the Deleted: <#>A registered bank must have an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the Reserve Bank’s “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process” (BS12).¶ ¶ Formatted: section inserted numbered, Left, No bullets or numbering, Hyphenate, Tab stops: Not at -2.54 cm + -1.27 cm + 0 cm Formatted: section inserted numbered, Left, No bullets or numbering, Hyphenate, Tab stops: Not at -2.54 cm + -1.27 cm + 0 cm Deleted: 2 Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 cm, Hanging: 1.25 cm, No bullets or numbering Deleted: ¶ Deleted: Locally incorporated banks will normally be subject to the
24 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January exception of the conditions relating to macro-prudential tools (see paragraph 97A) that will only be deployed at particular points in time. These conditions are:
25 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
26 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
LVR range Maximum percentage of new lending over the period falling within the LVR range Greater than or equal to [90%] [5%] Greater than or equal to [80%] [12%] [Additional rows if needed.] Deleted: The standard minimum for the one year core funding ratio is currently set at 70 per cent (from 1 July 2011), although the Reserve Bank intends to increase the minimum to 75 per cent from 1 July 2012, subject to a review of the impact of the proposed increase. ¶ ¶
27 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
28 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
29 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
LVR range Maximum percentage of new lending over the period falling within the LVR range Greater than or equal to [90%] [5%] Greater than or equal to [80%] [12%] [Additional rows if needed.]
30 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
31 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January conditions of registration. The Reserve Bank will have regard to any submissions made by affected registered banks before it puts any such changes into effect. 108. The Reserve Bank may consider and have regard to the whole of this Statement of Principles when varying, adding to, substituting or removing conditions of registration. 108A. Transitional arrangements may be provided in a bank’s conditions of registration where, for example, a change in policy has a substantial effect on the bank. An example of this is the move from the Basel I to the Basel II capital framework. G. BREACHES OF CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION 109. Where a bank is operating in breach of its conditions of registration, the Reserve Bank will, unless it can be satisfied that the breach can be promptly rectified, invoke its crisis management powers. This may involve giving directions to the bank or recommending that the bank be placed in statutory management. A complete list of crisis management powers is contained in section O. However, where the breach relates to the minimum capital adequacy requirements, the following process will apply. H. BREACH OF MINIMUM CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO REQUIREMENTS 110. Where a bank breaches its minimum capital adequacy ratio requirements (that is, the 4.5% Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the 6% Tier 1 capital ratio and the 8% Total capital ratio that normally apply to a banking group), the following framework will apply:
32 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January minimum capital adequacy requirements has been restored (and at that point distributions will be subject to limits that apply when the buffer ratio is 2.5% or less), unless the bank is contractually obliged to make such distributions (this will only arise with tier two capital, where the bank may be under a contractual obligation to make interest or dividend payments). (b) A statement that there will be no increase in the amount of the banking group's exposure to connected persons from the level which prevailed at the time of the first occurrence of the breach (where the level of the exposure is below the maximum limit) until the Common Equity Tier 1, the Tier 1 and Total capital ratios are restored to the minimum levels. (c) Where a banking group's Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio is less than 3.5 percent, a statement that there will be no increase in gross credit exposures from the level which prevailed at the time of the first occurrence of the breach, until such time as the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio exceeds 3.5 percent. 111. These measures may be supplemented or reinforced by relevant conditions of registration. Where a bank does not provide a plan including the elements listed above, or does not abide by the plan it has provided to the Reserve Bank, and/or does not comply with any special conditions of registration, the Bank may give directions to the bank or make use of the other crisis management powers it has under the Reserve Bank Act (see Section O). I. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS 112. Registered banks are required to make quarterly disclosures of key accounting and prudential information. These disclosure requirements have been developed by the Reserve Bank in consultation with banks and auditors. The information which banks must disclose is set out in Orders in Council issued in terms of section 81 of the Act. The Reserve Bank considers that quarterly disclosure reinforces disciplines on the management and directors of the banks to maintain prudent banking practices. 113. The main elements of the disclosure requirements are as follows:
33 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
34 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January guarantee and the strength of the incentives that exist for the guarantor to make payment under the guarantee in a timely manner. It may be difficult for individuals to make such an assessment themselves. 119. New applicants for registration must obtain a credit rating before registration. Where the applicant is a new company this may be an indicative rating, provided the indicative rating is accompanied by an undertaking from the rating agency that it will assign the indicative rating to the applicant in the event that registration is successful. The rating must be published in the bank’s initial disclosure statement. 120. Applicants must obtain their rating from a credit rating agency approved by the Reserve Bank for the purposes of section 80 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. These agencies are Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service. Applicants may only use another rating agency with the agreement of the Reserve Bank. In such cases, the Reserve Bank must first be satisfied that the rating agency meets the criteria set out in Appendix Three. K. RESPONSIBILITIES FOR NEW ZEALAND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OVERSEAS INCORPORATED BANKS 121. As required by section 82 of the Act, all overseas incorporated banks must notify the Reserve Bank of the name and address of their New Zealand chief executive officer and update this information as necessary. The Act defines a New Zealand chief executive officer as the most senior officer of the bank who is ordinarily resident in New Zealand, or, subject to the written agreement of the Reserve Bank, another person nominated by the bank. If a registered bank fails to nominate a New Zealand chief executive officer, the Bank may, after giving 14 days’ notice of its intention to do so, specify a particular employee to be the New Zealand chief executive officer. This requirement does not apply to New Zealand incorporated banks because the Chief Executive officer is normally a member of the board of directors and subject to the director responsibilities outlined in section L. 122. New Zealand chief executive officers of overseas incorporated banks or their agent authorised in writing, are required to sign every disclosure statement issued by the registered bank and to make certain statements (attestations). These attestations are also required of directors as set out in paragraphs 125-129. 123. A New Zealand chief executive officer may appoint an agent to make the attestations and sign the disclosure statements but responsibility for the veracity of the disclosure statements and the attestations remains with the New Zealand chief executive officer (and the directors). 124. Where the New Zealand chief executive officer believes the information contained within a disclosure statement is false or misleading, they should decline to sign the statement. In such a case the New Zealand chief executive officer would need to give notice to the Reserve Bank and to the public that the disclosure statement had been issued without their consent. In the absence of such notice, the New Zealand chief executive officer remains liable for the content of the disclosure statement, regardless of whether or not they signed the statements. A New Zealand chief executive who signs,
35 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January or has an agent sign, a disclosure statement which includes false or misleading information may be subject to civil or criminal liability. L. DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES 125. Directors are required to sign bank disclosure statements which must include certain statements by the directors (attestations). This policy is intended to emphasise the fact that directors have ultimate responsibility for the ongoing viability of their bank and to strengthen incentives for them to take an active interest in key matters affecting the soundness of their bank. 126. Directors are required to attest whether, after due enquiry by them, over the accounting period , they believe:
36 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 130. As specified in section 77A of the Act a person must obtain the written consent of the Reserve Bank before giving effect to a transaction that would result in that person having a “significant influence” over the registered bank or increasing the person’s level of significant influence beyond the level previously approved by the Reserve Bank. A significant influence is defined in the Act as:
37 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January N. ESTABLISHMENT OF OVERSEAS BRANCHES, REPRESENTATIVE OFFICES OR SUBSIDIARIES 135. Locally incorporated banks wishing to establish a subsidiary, branch or representative office in another country should seek the approval of the Reserve Bank before making application to the host supervisor or licensing authority. O. CRISIS MANAGEMENT 136. The Act sets out various powers which the Reserve Bank can use in the event that a bank distress or failure situation threatens the soundness of the financial system. 137. The crisis management powers the Bank has available are as follows: (I) Section 77 of the Act - Power to recommend deregistration 138. Where the Reserve Bank considers that any of the following applies:
38 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January The Reserve Bank may recommend to the Minister of Finance that the registration of the bank be cancelled. The Reserve Bank is required to give a registered bank at least seven days’ notice of its intention to make such a recommendation and to provide a statement of its reasons. It must give the registered bank a reasonable opportunity to make submissions, and must have regard to those submissions. (II) Section 99 of the Act - Power to obtain information and documents 139. Where the Reserve Bank believes that information provided to it, or which has been published in a disclosure statement, is false or misleading or where a registered bank has failed to provide or publish required information, the Reserve Bank may, if it considers it necessary, appoint a person to enter and search the bank's premises in order to obtain the information required. (III) Section 101 of the Act - Power to investigate the affairs of a registered bank 140. Where the Reserve Bank is satisfied that it is necessary or desirable to do so in order to determine whether or not it should exercise its power to recommend statutory management or its power to give directions, it may appoint someone to investigate the affairs of a registered bank. (IV) Section 113 of the Act - Power to give directions 141. If the Reserve Bank has reasonable grounds to believe that any of the following applies to a registered bank or an associated person of a registered bank:
39 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January or that any of the following persons has failed to comply with any requirement imposed by the Act or regulations made under the Act or has been convicted of an offence against the Act:
40 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
41 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 144C. The non-viability trigger event for the registered bank defined as: (a) a direction given, by notice in writing, to the registered bank by the Reserve Bank under section 113 of the Act, on the basis that the financial position of the registered bank is such that it meets any of the grounds in section 113(1)(a) to (e) of the Act, requiring the registered bank to exercise its rights of either writeoff or conversion, under the instrument; or (b) the registered bank being made subject to statutory management by an Order in Council issued pursuant to section 117 of the Act. 144D. The circumstances in which the Reserve Bank would issue a direction to a registered bank under section 113(1) of the Act requiring conversion or write-off of capital instruments as per the terms of the instrument cannot be determined ex ante. The Reserve Bank’s consideration will include the particular circumstances of the registered bank, the relative ranking of claims, whether it is likely that other resolution or recovery mechanisms will be used and wider financial stability concerns. However the guiding principle for the Reserve Bank will be that such a direction will be issued when the Reserve Bank determines that, without conversion or write-off, the registered bank would become non-viable. 144E. The Reserve Bank does not anticipate (but also does not rule out) that it would direct a registered bank under section 113(1) of the Act to convert or write-off capital as per the terms of the instrument when, in the view of the Reserve Bank the registered bank is operating— (a) above its conservation buffer; or (b) within its conservation buffer but the immediate risk that its capital will deteriorate below its minimum capital ratio is low. 144F. If a registered bank is placed into statutory management the statutory manager will have the right to decide whether capital instruments will be converted or written-off (to the extent conversion or write-off has not already occurred). In deciding whether to exercise this right the statutory manager must take into account the considerations set out in section 121 of the Act. P. FOREIGN SUPERVISOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION HELD BY REGISTERED BANKS 145. Under section 98A of the Act, a foreign supervisor wishing to carry out an on-site inspection of, or obtain information from, a registered bank or a member of a registered bank’s banking group for the purposes of the foreign supervisor’s supervisory functions may request authorisation to do so from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. The Reserve Bank will grant authorisation only if it is satisfied that sufficient provision exists in the foreign supervisor’s jurisdiction to protect the confidentiality of the information, data and forecasts obtained or required by the foreign supervisor.
42 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 146. If the Reserve Bank authorises a foreign supervisor to carry out an on-site inspection of, or to obtain information from, a registered bank or a member of a registered bank’s banking group, then the registered bank is required under section 98B of the Act to supply the foreign supervisor with any information, data, or forecasts, including information relating to individual customers, that the foreign supervisor requires in order to carry out its supervisory functions. 147. If the Reserve Bank authorises a foreign supervisor to inspect and require information from a registered bank or a member of a registered bank’s banking group, the Reserve Bank will notify the registered bank that such an authorisation has been made and the terms of that authorisation. Q. UNITED NATIONS’ SANCTIONS 148. In order to assess the standing of an applicant (or its owner), the Reserve Bank will additionally have regard to New Zealand’s responsibilities pursuant to resolutions made by the United Nations Security Council under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations that impose sanctions relating to the banking sector, in particular, for the purposes of:
43 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January APPENDIX ONE – STANDARD CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION This appendix sets out standard conditions of registration for a registered bank. The standard conditions for New Zealand incorporated banks will vary depending on whether a bank’s capital requirements are calculated under the standardised approach (in BS2A) or the internal models based approach (in BS2B) of the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework. The actual conditions of registration imposed on an individual bank may vary depending on the circumstances of the bank. The standard conditions also provide conditions that are part of the Reserve Bank’s macro prudential toolkit; these are the buffer ratio, and conditions imposing restrictions on high-LVR residential mortgage lending. These tools may be deployed at particular times, based on judgements the Reserve Bank makes about system-wide risks. The buffer ratio is normally set at 2.5% of risk weighted assets but on occasions may be set higher to accommodate a system-wide build-up of risk; the addition to the buffer over 2.5% is the countercyclical capital buffer. Restrictions on high-LVR residential mortgage lending may also be imposed if indicators such as rapid price rises and loosening credit standards in the housing market point to an increase in system-wide risk. I. CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION FOR NEW ZEALAND INCORPORATED REGISTERED BANKS Capital requirements – conditions for the standardised approach
44 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (b) under its ICAAP, the bank identifies and measures its “other material risks” defined as all material risks of the banking group that are not explicitly captured in the calculation of the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the Total capital ratio under the requirements set out in the document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A) dated [month year]; and (c) the bank determines an internal capital allocation for each identified and measured “other material risk”. 1B. That, if the buffer ratio of the banking group is 2.5% or less, the bank must: (a) according to the following table, limit the aggregate distributions of the bank’s earnings to the percentage limit to distributions that corresponds to the banking group’s buffer ratio: Banking group’s buffer ratio Percentage limit to distributions of the bank’s earnings 0% – 0.625% 0%
0.625 – 1.25% 20% 1.25 – 1.875% 40% 1.875 – 2.5% 60% (b) prepare a capital plan to restore the banking group’s buffer ratio to above 2.5% within any timeframe determined by the Reserve Bank for restoring the buffer ratio; and (c) have the capital plan approved by the Reserve Bank. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— “buffer ratio”, “distributions”, and “earnings” have the same meaning as in Part 3 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A) dated [month year]. This condition of registration applies on and after 1 January 2014. Capital requirements – conditions for the models based approach
45 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (d) the Total capital of the banking group is not less than $30 million; and (e) the process in Subpart 2H of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is followed for the recognition and repayment of capital. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— the scalar referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital adequacy framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is 1.06. “Total capital ratio”, “Tier 1 capital ratio”, “Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio”, and “Total capital” must be calculated in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital adequacy framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]. [If applicable—] For the purposes of this condition of registration, the supervisory adjustment referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is the sum of: [any applicable supervisory adjustments] 1A. That— (a) the bank has an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the requirements set out in the document “Guidelines on a bank’s internal capital adequacy assessment process (‘ICAAP’)” (BS12) dated [month year]; (b) under its ICAAP the bank identifies and measures its “other material risks” defined as all material risks of the banking group that are not explicitly captured in the calculation of the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the Total capital ratio under the requirements set out in the document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]; and (c) the bank determines an internal capital allocation for each identified and measured “other material risk”. 1B. That the banking group complies with all requirements set out in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]. 1C. That, if the buffer ratio of the banking group is 2.5% or less, the bank must: (a) according to the following table, limit the aggregate distributions of the bank’s earnings to the percentage limit to distributions that corresponds to the banking group’s buffer ratio: Banking group’s buffer ratio Percentage limit to distributions of the bank’s earnings 0% – 0.625% 0%
46 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
0.625 – 1.25% 20% 1.25 – 1.875% 40% 1.875 – 2.5% 60% (b) prepare a capital plan to restore the banking group’s buffer ratio to above 2.5% within any timeframe determined by the Reserve Bank for restoring the buffer ratio; and (c) have the capital plan approved by the Reserve Bank. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— “buffer ratio”, “distributions”, and “earnings” have the same meaning as in Part 3 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]. the scalar referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital adequacy framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is 1.06. This condition of registration applies on and after 1 January 2014. General conditions of registration
47 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January In determining the total amount of the banking group’s insurance business— (a) all amounts must relate to on balance sheet items only, and must comply with generally accepted accounting practice; and (b) if products or assets of which an insurance business is comprised also contain a non-insurance component, the whole of such products or assets must be considered part of the insurance business. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— “insurance business” means the undertaking or assumption of liability as an insurer under a contract of insurance: “insurer” and “contract of insurance” have the same meaning as provided in sections 6 and 7 of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010. 4. That the aggregate credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of any allowances for impairment) of the banking group to all connected persons do not exceed the ratingcontingent limit outlined in the following matrix: Credit rating of the registered bank1 Connected exposure limit (% of the Banking Group’s Tier 1 capital) AA/Aa2 and above 75 AA-/Aa3 70 A+/A1 60 A/A2 40 A-/A3 30 BBB+/Baa1 and below 15 Within the rating-contingent limit, credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of any allowances for impairment) to non-bank connected persons shall not exceed 15 percent of the banking group’s tier 1 capital. For the purposes of this condition of registration, compliance with the rating-contingent connected exposure limit is determined in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Connected Exposures Policy” (BS8) dated [month year]. 5. That exposures to connected persons are not on more favourable terms (e.g. as relates to such matters as credit assessment, tenor, interest rates, amortisation schedules and requirement for collateral) than corresponding exposures to non-connected persons. 6. That the registered bank complies with the following corporate governance requirements: (a) the board of the registered bank must have at least five directors; (b) the majority of the board members must be non-executive directors; (c) at least half of the board members must be independent directors; 1 This table uses the rating scales of Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service. (Fitch Ratings’ scale is identical to Standard & Poor’s.)
48 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (d) an alternate director,— (i) for a non-executive director must be non-executive; and (ii) for an independent director must be independent; (e) at least half of the independent directors of the registered bank must be ordinarily resident in New Zealand; (f) the chairperson of the board of the registered bank must be independent; and (g) the bank’s constitution must not include any provision permitting a director, when exercising powers or performing duties as a director, to act other than in what he or she believes is the best interests of the company (i.e. the registered bank). For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-executive” and “independent” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Corporate Governance” (BS14) dated [month year]. 7. That no appointment of any director, chief executive officer, or executive who reports or is accountable directly to the chief executive officer, is made in respect of the registered bank unless: (a) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (b) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment. 8. That a person must not be appointed as chairperson of the board of the registered bank unless: (a) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (b) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment. 9. That the registered bank has a board audit committee, or other separate board committee covering audit matters, that meets the following requirements: (a) the mandate of the committee must include: ensuring the integrity of the bank’s financial controls, reporting systems and internal audit standards; (b) the committee must have at least three members; (c) every member of the committee must be a non-executive director of the registered bank; (d) the majority of the members of the committee must be independent; and (e) the chairperson of the committee must be independent and must not be the chairperson of the registered bank.
49 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-executive” and “independent” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Corporate Governance” (BS14) dated [month year]. 10. That a substantial proportion of the bank’s business is conducted in and from New Zealand. 11. That the banking group complies with the following quantitative requirements for liquidity-risk management: (a) the one-week mismatch ratio of the banking group is not less than zero per cent at the end of each business day; (b) the one-month mismatch ratio of the banking group is not less than zero per cent at the end of each business day; and (c) the one-year core funding ratio of the banking group is not less than 75 per cent at the end of each business day. For the purposes of this condition of registration, the ratios identified must be calculated in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand documents entitled “Liquidity Policy” (BS13) dated [month year] and “Liquidity Policy Annex: Liquid Assets” (BS13A) dated [month year]. 12. That the registered bank has an internal framework for liquidity risk management that is adequate in the registered bank’s view for managing the bank’s liquidity risk at a prudent level, and that, in particular: (a) is clearly documented and communicated to all those in the organisation with responsibility for managing liquidity and liquidity risk; (b) identifies responsibility for approval, oversight and implementation of the framework and policies for liquidity risk management; (c) identifies the principal methods that the bank will use for measuring, monitoring and controlling liquidity risk; and (d) considers the material sources of stress that the bank might face, and prepares the bank to manage stress through a contingency funding plan. 13. That no more than 10% of total assets may be beneficially owned by a SPV. For the purposes of this condition,— “total assets” means all assets of the banking group plus any assets held by any SPV that are not included in the banking group’s assets: “SPV” means a person— (a) to whom any member of the banking group, has sold, assigned, or otherwise transferred, any asset; Deleted: 70
50 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January (b) who has granted, or may grant, a security interest in its assets for the benefit of any holder of any covered bond; and (c) who carries on no other business except for that necessary or incidental to guarantee the obligations of any member of the banking group under a covered bond: “covered bond” means a debt security issued by any member of the banking group, for which repayment to holders is guaranteed by a SPV, and investors retain an unsecured claim on the issuer. 14. That— (a) no member of the banking group may give effect to a qualifying acquisition or business combination that meets the notification threshold, and does not meet the non-objection threshold, unless: (i) the registered bank has notified the Reserve Bank in writing of the intended acquisition or business combination and at least 10 working days have passed; and (ii) at the time of notifying the Reserve Bank of the intended acquisition or business combination, the registered bank provided the Reserve Bank with the information required under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated [month year]; and (b) no member of the banking group may give effect to a qualifying acquisition or business combination that meets the non-objection threshold unless: (i) the registered bank has notified the Reserve Bank in writing of the intended acquisition or business combination; (ii) at the time of notifying the Reserve Bank of the intended acquisition or business combination, the registered bank provided the Reserve Bank with the information required under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated [month year]; and (iii) the Reserve Bank has given the registered bank a notice of non-objection to the significant acquisition or business combination. For the purposes of this condition of registration, “qualifying acquisition or business combination”, “notification threshold” and “non-objection threshold” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated December 2011. The following three conditions only apply during a period when the Reserve Bank has decided to deploy its macro-prudential tool to restrict high-LVR lending in the residential property sector. Note that the figures set out below are purely illustrative, and should not be taken as any indication of the actual levels of restrictions that the Reserve Bank would impose in any particular circumstances:
51 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 15. That, in respect of new commitments for non-exempt residential mortgage loans in New Zealand that the banking group enters into during each three month period ending on the last day of a calendar month – (a) no more than [5%] of the aggregate amount of the loan values associated with such commitments may relate to commitments associated with loan-to-valuation ratios (LVRs) greater than or equal to [90%]; (b) no more than [12%] of the aggregate amount of the loan values associated with such commitments may relate to commitments associated with LVRs greater than or equal to [80%]; [additional such restrictions as need be] For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-exempt”, “residential mortgage loan in New Zealand”, “new commitment”, “loan value” and “loan-to-valuation ratio” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]. 16. That the banking group, in respect of each new commitment for a residential mortgage loan in New Zealand that it enters into while this condition is in force – (a) must ensure that the loan contract prevents the borrower from granting any additional charge over the property without the bank’s permission; and (b) must not, while this condition is in force, give permission to the borrower to grant an additional charge over the property in favour of another creditor unless the total of the amounts secured on the property after the additional charge has been granted would remain below [X%]. [– where X% will be set at the lowest point of the range restrictions specified in condition (15)] For the purposes of this condition of registration, “residential mortgage loan” and “new commitment” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]. 17. That neither the registered bank nor any other member of the banking group must enter into a new commitment to lend against a second- or lower-ranking mortgage over a residential property in New Zealand if another lender has in place an existing residential mortgage loan secured on the same property, unless the sum of the loan amount arising from the new commitment and all loans secured by higher-ranking mortgages from other lenders is no more than [X%] of the property value determined at the time that the new commitment is or would be made. [– where X% will be set at the lowest point of the range restrictions specified in condition (15)] For the purposes of this condition of registration, “residential mortgage loan” and “new commitment” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]. In these conditions of registration, — “banking group” means [X Bank’s] financial reporting group (as defined in section 2(1) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993): Deleted: ¶ Formatted: Font: Italic Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 cm, Hanging: 1.27 cm, No bullets or numbering, Don't hyphenate, Tab stops: -2.54 cm, Left + -1.27 cm, Left + 0 cm, Left Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.27 cm + Tab after: 2.54 cm + Indent at: 2.54 cm Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 cm, Hanging: 1.27 cm, No bullets or numbering, Don't hyphenate, Tab stops: -2.54 cm, Left + -1.27 cm, Left + 0 cm, Left Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, … + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.27 cm + Tab after: 2.54 cm + Indent at: 2.54 cm Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 cm, Hanging: 1.27 cm, No bullets or numbering, Don't hyphenate, Tab stops: -2.54 cm, Left + -1.27 cm, Left + 0 cm, Left
52 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January “generally accepted accounting practice” has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Financial Reporting Act 1993. (IA) LOCALLY INCORPORATED BANKS WHOSE NEW ZEALAND LIABILITIES, NET OF AMOUNTS DUE TO RELATED PARTIES, EXCEED $10 BILLION (ADDITIONAL TO THOSE NORMALLY APPLYING TO ALL LOCALLY INCORPORATED BANKS)
53 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January
54 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 6. That [name of bank] complies with the following minimum capital adequacy requirements, as administered by [name of supervisory authority in the bank’s jurisdiction of domicile]: (a) Common Equity Tier 1 capital of [name of bank] is not less than 4.5 percent of risk weighted exposures; (b) Tier 1 capital of [name of bank] is not less than 6 percent of risk weighted exposures; (c) Total capital of [name of bank] is not less than 8 percent of risk weighted exposures. 7. That liabilities of the registered bank in New Zealand, net of amounts due to related parties (including amounts due to a subsidiary or affiliate of the registered bank), do not exceed NZD $15 billion. 8. That retail deposits of the registered bank in New Zealand do not exceed $200 million. For the purposes of this condition retail deposits are defined as deposits by natural persons, excluding deposits with an outstanding balance which exceeds $250,000. This condition applies only to banks which are incorporated in a jurisdiction which has legislation which gives deposits made, or credit conferred, in that jurisdiction a preferential claim in a winding up or which do not provide adequate disclosure in the home jurisdiction. 9. That the registered bank has an internal framework for liquidity risk management that is adequate in the registered bank’s view for managing the bank’s liquidity risk at a prudent level, and that, in particular: (a) is clearly documented and communicated to all those in the organisation with responsibility for managing liquidity and liquidity risk; (b) identifies responsibility for approval, oversight and implementation of the framework and policies for liquidity risk management; (c) identifies the principal methods that the bank will use for measuring, monitoring and controlling liquidity risk; and (d) considers the material sources of stress that the bank might face, and prepares the bank to manage stress through a contingency funding plan. There will also normally be a condition requiring the registered bank in New Zealand to comply with one or more minimum quantitative requirements for liquidity risk, but the specification of these requirements will vary from branch to branch. The following three conditions only apply during a period when the Reserve Bank has decided to deploy its macro-prudential tool to restrict high-LVR lending in the residential property sector. Note that the figures set out below are purely illustrative, and should not be taken as any indication of the actual levels of restrictions that the Reserve Bank would impose in any particular circumstances:
55 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 10. That, in respect of new commitments for non-exempt residential mortgage loans in New Zealand that the registered bank enters into during each three month period ending on the last day of a calendar month – (a) no more than [5%] of the aggregate amount of the loan values associated with such commitments may relate to commitments associated with loan-to-valuation ratios (LVRs) greater than or equal to [90%]; (b) no more than [12%] of the aggregate amount of the loan values associated with such commitments may relate to commitments associated with LVRs greater than or equal to [80%]; [additional such restrictions as need be] For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-exempt”, “residential mortgage loan in New Zealand”, “new commitment”, “loan value” and “loan-to-valuation ratio” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]. 11. That the registered bank, in respect of each new commitment for a residential mortgage loan in New Zealand that it enters into while this condition is in force – (a) must ensure that the loan contract prevents the borrower from granting any additional charge over the property without the bank’s permission; and (b) must not, while this condition is in force, give permission to the borrower to grant an additional charge over the property in favour of another creditor unless the total of the amounts secured on the property after the additional charge has been granted would remain below [X%]. [– where X% will be set at the lowest point of the range restrictions specified in condition (10)] For the purposes of this condition of registration, “residential mortgage loan” and “new commitment” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]. 12. That the registered bank must not enter into a new commitment to lend against a second- or lower-ranking mortgage over a residential property in New Zealand if another lender has in place an existing residential mortgage loan secured on the same property, unless the sum of the loan amount arising from the new commitment and all loans secured by higher-ranking mortgages from other lenders is no more than [X%] of the property value determined at the time that the new commitment is or would be made. [– where X% will be set at the lowest point of the range restrictions specified in condition (10)] For the purposes of this condition of registration, “residential mortgage loan” and “new commitment” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]. In these conditions of registration,— Formatted: Indent: Left: 0 cm, Hanging: 1.27 cm, Space Before: 12 pt, No bullets or numbering, Don't hyphenate, Tab stops: -2.54 cm, Left
56 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January “banking group” means the New Zealand business of the registered bank and its subsidiaries as required to be reported in group financial statements for the group’s New Zealand business under section 9(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993: “business of the registered bank in New Zealand” means the New Zealand business of the registered bank as required to be reported in financial statements under section 8(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993: “generally accepted accounting practice” has the same meaning as in section 2 of the Financial Reporting Act 1993: “liabilities of the registered bank in New Zealand” means the liabilities of the registered bank as required to be reported in financial statements under section 8(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993.
57 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January APPENDIX TWO – CREDIT RATING REQUIREMENT SECTION 80 NOTICE issued to registered banks With effect from [date], the Reserve Bank of New Zealand hereby requires [name of bank]:
58 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January APPENDIX THREE – APPROVAL OF CREDIT RATING AGENCIES
59 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 3. Resources (1) A rating agency should have sufficient financial and human resources to carry out high quality credit assessments. (2) A rating agency should— (a) be able to develop and maintain systems on an ongoing basis to produce timely, consistent and credible credit assessments and ratings; (b) allocate a sufficient number of appropriately qualified and competent people to the analysis, review and approval processes for the production of ratings; and (c) have sufficient resources to allow for regular substantive interaction with the subjects of its credit assessments. (3) A rating agency’s financial viability should not depend upon a small number of clients. (4) Rating decisions should be made by a rating committee composed of adequately qualified and experienced individuals in accordance with the rating agency’s methodologies. 4. Objectivity (1) A rating agency’s assessment methodologies should be— (a) documented; (b) rigorous and systematic; (c) applied consistently; (d) where possible, validated by substantial historical experience; (e) based on both qualitative and quantitative approaches; and (f) subject to ongoing review. (2) A rating agency’s assessment methodologies should, where possible, be established for a sufficient period of time to provide for them to be rigorously back-tested and refined to a high level of confidence. (3) The ratings produced by its assessment methodologies should— (a) provide credible and consistent measures of credit risk; (b) be responsive to changes in financial condition; (c) be continuous (that is, not be point in time ratings); and (d) be subject to ongoing review, including— (i) after all significant events; and (ii) at least annually. (4) Paragraphs (3)(c) and (3)(d) do not apply to a rating that is not subject to ongoing monitoring or surveillance if the rating clearly indicates that it is not subject to any ongoing monitoring or surveillance.
60 Ref #5301831 BS1 XX 2013 Deleted: January 5. Third party access to ratings (1) A rating agency’s publicly disseminated credit rating opinions, analysis, reports and similar or related products should be accessible on equivalent terms to persons who have a legitimate interest in them, regardless of the jurisdiction in which they operate. (2) A rating agency should not use unsolicited ratings to pressure the subjects of those ratings to obtain solicited ratings. (3) A rating agency should not prevent the subjects of its credit rating assessments from disseminating that subject’s public credit ratings. 6. Disclosure A rating agency should publicly disclose and maintain in a readily accessible form the following information: (a) its ownership and corporate structure; (b) its code of conduct; (c) its process for assigning, monitoring and changing its credit ratings; (d) definitions for each of its rating categories and rating modifiers, including: (i) the definition of default; (ii) the time horizons, where applicable; and (iii) the full rating scale; (these definitions should be in a form that enables comparisons with ratings in other sectors and, to the extent possible, those produced by other rating agencies); (e) the actual default rates experienced in each rating category over time; (f) the probabilities associated with transitions between rating categories, (for example, the likelihood of AA ratings becoming A over time); (g) its policy on the release of ratings, including changes in ratings or rating modifiers; and (h) its policy on unsolicited ratings. 7. Consistency and comparability (1) Ratings should represent credit risk in a consistent and comparable manner with regard to established practices for ratings. (2) The nomenclature associated with ratings should be established with regard to existing practices and with particular regard to default rates. 8. Credibility In addition to the extent to which credibility is supported by the other criteria in this appendix, the Reserve Bank may have regard to other factors in assessing a rating agency’s credibility including, for example, the extent to which its credit assessments and ratings are used in the market by participants such as issuers, investors, bankers, insurers, securities traders and other financial services regulators, or the extent to which a rating agency is recognised under other regulatory regime.