FATF Statements on High-Risk Jurisdictions

Circular No. 4 of 2026 Date: 10th July 2026 Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”) statements concerning:

1. Jurisdictions subject to a FATF call on its members and other jurisdictions to apply countermeasures.
2. High-risk jurisdictions subject to a FATF call on its members and other jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence measures proportionate to the risks arising from the jurisdiction.
3. Jurisdictions under increased monitoring of the FATF. The Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) would like to draw the attention of all reporting entities to the following decisions taken by the FATF during the Plenary meeting held in Paris from June 17th - 19th, 2026.

1. JURISDICTIONS SUBJECT TO A FATF CALL ON ITS MEMBERS AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS TO APPLY COUNTERMEASURES High-risk jurisdictions have significant strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter money￾laundering, terrorist financing and financing of proliferation. For all countries identified as high-risk, the FATF calls on all members and urges all jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence, and, in the most serious cases, countries are called upon to apply countermeasures to protect the international financial system from the money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from the country. This list is often externally referred to as the “blacklist”. Despite the calls by FATF on its members and other jurisdictions to apply countermeasures, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) has increased connectivity with the international financial system, which raises proliferation financing (PF) risks, as the FATF noted in February 2024. This requires greater vigilance and renewed implementation and enforcement of these countermeasures against the DPRK. As set out in UNSCR 2270, DPRK frequently uses front companies, shell companies, joint ventures and complex, opaque ownership structures for the purpose of violating sanctions. As such, FATF encourages its members and all countries to apply enhanced due diligence to the DPRK and its ability to facilitate transactions on its behalf. Since February 2020, Iran reported in January, August and December 2024 and August and November 2025 with no material changes in the status of its action plan. Considering the United Nations Security Council Resolutions related to Iran’s lack of compliance with its nuclear non-proliferation obligations, the FATF reminds all jurisdictions of their obligations under

the FATF standards to address proliferation financing risks emanating from Iran. Additionally, given the ongoing terrorist financing and proliferation financing threats emanating from Iran and as Iran’s action plan remains incomplete, the FATF reiterates its call on its members and urges all jurisdictions to apply effective countermeasures on Iran, including the following: • Refusing the establishment of subsidiaries or branches or representative offices of financial institutions and virtual asset service providers from the country concerned or otherwise taking into account the fact that the relevant financial institution or virtual asset service provider is from a country that does not have adequate AML/CFT systems. • Prohibiting financial institutions and virtual asset service providers from establishing branches or representative offices in the country concerned or otherwise taking into account the fact that the relevant branch or representative office would be in a country that does not have adequate AML/CFT systems. • On a risk basis, limiting business relationships or financial transactions, including virtual asset transactions, with the identified country or persons in the country concerned. • Prohibiting financial institutions and virtual asset service providers from establishing new correspondent relationships and requiring them to undertake a risk-based review of existing correspondent relationships with financial institutions and virtual asset service providers in the country concerned. Given heightened proliferation financing risks, the FATF reiterates its call to apply countermeasures on these high-risk jurisdictions. When applying countermeasures, countries should ensure that flows of funds involving humanitarian assistance, food and health supplies, diplomatic operating costs, and personal remittances are appropriately handled on a risk basis considering the terrorist financing or proliferation financing risks emanating from Iran, in line with international obligations. Iran will remain on the list of FATF High Risk Jurisdictions Subject to a Call for Action until the full Action Plan has been completed. 2. HIGH-RISK JURISDICTIONS SUBJECT TO A FATF CALL ON ITS MEMBERS AND OTHER JURISDICTIONS TO APPLY ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE MEASURES PROPORTIONATE TO THE RISKS ARISING FROM THE JURISDICTION In February 2020, Myanmar committed to address its strategic deficiencies. Myanmar’s action plan expired in September 2021. In October 2022, given the continued lack of progress and the majority of its action items still not addressed after a year beyond the action plan deadline, the FATF decided that further action was necessary in line with its procedures and FATF calls on its members and other jurisdictions to apply enhanced due diligence measures proportionate to the risk arising from Myanmar. The FATF requires that as part of enhanced due diligence, financial institutions should increase the degree and nature of monitoring of the business relationship, in order to determine whether those transactions or activities appear unusual or suspicious. If no further progress is made by October 2026, the FATF will consider countermeasures. When applying enhanced due diligence measures, countries should ensure that flows of funds for humanitarian assistance, legitimate NPO activity and remittances are neither disrupted nor discouraged.

The FATF will also continue to monitor whether Myanmar’s AML/CFT activities apply undue scrutiny to legitimate financial flows. Myanmar will remain on the list of countries subject to a call for action until its full action plan is completed. The following web link to the FATF’s website provides for the list of high-risk jurisdictions subject to a call for action as identified by the FATF: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored-jurisdictions/call-for￾action-june-2026.html 3. JURISDICTIONS UNDER INCREASED MONITORING Jurisdictions under increased monitoring are actively working with the FATF to address strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter ML/TF/PF. When the FATF places a jurisdiction under increased monitoring, it means the country has committed to implementing an Action Plan to swiftly resolve the identified strategic deficiencies within agreed timeframes. The FATF calls for the application of a Risk-Based approach and encourages its members and all jurisdictions to consider the information presented through the link below in their risk analysis. As countries consider actions based on their risk analysis taking into account the information contained in the link below, they should ensure that flows of funds for humanitarian assistance, legitimate NPO activity and remittances are neither disrupted nor discouraged. New jurisdictions subject to increased monitoring: Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iraq The FATF identifies additional jurisdictions, on an on-going basis, that have strategic deficiencies in their regimes to counter ML/TF/PF. Following review, the FATF has also identified Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iraq as new jurisdictions subject to increased monitoring. The following web link to the FATF website provides for the list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring as identified by the FATF: https://www.fatf-gafi.org/content/fatf-gafi/en/publications/High-risk-and-other-monitored￾jurisdictions/increased-monitoring-june-2026.html Jurisdictions no longer under Increased Monitoring – Algeria and Namibia The FATF Plenary welcomed and congratulated, the Plenary congratulated Algeria and Namibia for positive progress in addressing strategic anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism and proliferation financing (AML/CFT/CPF) deficiencies identified during their mutual evaluations. The jurisdictions have completed their Action Plans within agreed timeframes and will no longer be subject to the FATF’s increased monitoring process. Algeria and Namibia will continue to work with their FATF-Style Regional Bodies, of which they are a member, to sustain improvements in their AML/CFT/CPF systems. All reporting entities are hereby guided to refer to the following link to the FATF website concerning the outcomes of the Plenary held from June 17th to 19th, 2026. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/publications/Fatfgeneral/outcomes-fatf-plenary-june-2026.html

4. OBLIGATION TO APPLY ENHANCED DUE DILIGENCE AND ENHANCED ON-GOING MONITORING TO HIGHER RISK JURISDICTIONS Section 41(3) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Act, 2020 (“AML/CFT Act”) and Regulation 16 of the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism Regulations, 2020 (“AML/CFT Regulations”) call for all reporting entities to apply enhanced due diligence measures and enhanced ongoing monitoring required under section 35 of the AML/CFT Act on a risk-sensitive basis, in any situation which by its nature presents a higher risk of money laundering, terrorist financing activities or other criminal conduct, or in respect of a business relationship with persons from, and transactions in, countries which do not apply or fully apply the FATF Recommendations. All reporting entities are required to ensure that they remain up to date with the information provided by the FATF regarding high-risk and other monitored jurisdictions and are aware of any changes or updates made to these two lists published by FATF. Reporting entities are reminded of the importance of complying with their obligations under Section 41(3) of the AML/CFT Act and Regulation 16 of the AML/CFT Regulations to apply enhanced due diligence and enhanced monitoring in relation to business relationships and transactions with natural and legal persons (including financial institutions) from countries for which this is called for by the FATF. Reporting entities are also being called upon to undertake the following additional actions (at a minimum) to demonstrate compliance with the above requirement: • In relation to High-Risk Jurisdiction Subject to a Call for Action

• consult the FATF public documents which are published on the website of the FATF (https://www.fatf-gafi.org/) on a continuous basis to identify any changes and apply the countermeasures recommended by the FATF in those documents.
• give special attention to business relationships and transactions with persons (both natural and legal persons) in those high-risk countries, including companies, legal arrangements/trusts and financial institutions based in those countries.
• strengthen systems and controls in managing their exposure to the vulnerabilities identified by FATF; and
• ensure that correspondent relationships, in particular, are not being used to evade countermeasures and risk mitigation practices. • In relation to Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring
• to take into consideration the information published by the FATF relating to these jurisdictions in their risk assessments; and • To review the FATF’s website on a continuous basis to identify whether any changes or updates have been published by the FATF. In the event of any updates, the FSA will also be notifying reporting entities accordingly. Failure to comply with Section 41(3) of the AML/CFT Act and Regulation 16 of the AML/CFT Regulations shall lead to the FSA taking relevant enforcement actions as provided for by relevant legislations.

The FSA counts on the usual cooperation of reporting entities in maintaining effective systems of controls in safeguarding the integrity of Seychelles. Reporting entities may contact the FSA, through email at amlcft@fsaseychelles.sc, for any clarification or further information regarding the content of this Circular. FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY