Regulatory Alerts2017-04-25
Added · Updated
Initial assessment fitness assessment fit for the position following additional preparation or training
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) provides anonymized practical examples illustrating how candidates may be deemed unfit for key positions due to insufficient preparation, lack of sector-specific knowledge, or inadequate institution-specific knowledge during fitness assessments. The document details scenarios where candidates initially fail to demonstrate clarity, specific expertise, or awareness of institutional issues, leading to requests for further interviews or negative decisions. It highlights that candidates can subsequently be found fit after undergoing additional preparation, training, or familiarization with relevant organizational contexts, often facilitated by institutions sharing non-public information under non-disclosure agreements.
Factsheet
Read aloud
Practical examples may help candidates prepare for the assessment. The examples below are intended to provide candidates and institutions with some pointers as to what De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) considers important with respect to assessments. All examples have been anonymised, and specific details have been omitted.
Published: 25 April 2017
Insufficient preparation
A foreign candidate with a non-regulated but listed enterprise background appeared to be opaque in responding to the interview questions, as a result of which his considerations in decision making were unclear to us. In the second interview the candidate was able to respond to our questions clearly and directly, and we found him to be fit for the position. After the assessment, we discussed the differences between the two interviews with the candidate, who indicated that prior to the first interview, the relationship with the supervisory authority was not clear to him and that he did not know what was expected of him. This was the reason why he had responded to the questions only in general terms in the first interview.
Insufficient preparation
During the first interview, a proposed supervisory board member for an insurance company kept speaking in generalities and appeared to be unable to explain his own role in certain situations. This did not change when the candidate was made aware of this. After the interview, we contacted the candidate by telephone and informed him that we were unable to reach a decision and that a second interview was necessary. During this second interview, the candidate was much more clear and specific about his duties and responsibilities, and was able to explain his own role and activities. We then issued a positive decision. In our evaluation of the assessment, we found the candidate to be insufficiently prepared for the assessment.
Lack of sector-specific knowledge due to insufficient preparation
A large company proposed a candidate for appointment as chair of the management board. The candidate had a good reputation as a chair in a related sector. The company was facing a number of important strategic decisions. The assessment interview included questions about various scenarios impacting the organisation's operational management and possible consequences. The candidate was unable to answer financial sector-related questions. He appeared to have insufficient sector-specific knowledge to be able to translate his experience gained in the other sector to the situation at the new company. We therefore found the candidate to be unfit for the position.
After a thorough induction and training programme, the candidate was again proposed for the position. Now he was able to adequately link his previously gained experience to the situation at the company, and we issued a positive decision.
Insufficient institution-specific knowledge
We assessed a proposed supervisory board member of an institution with several issues at play. According to the application file, the candidate was to be responsible for supervision of the organisation's risk environment. He would also be appointed as a member of the risk and audit committee to address the issues. During the interview it became apparent that the candidate was not aware of the current situation at the institution, and had only consulted public sources such as the annual report. As a result, he was insufficiently prepared for the interview, and was consequently unable to demonstrate that he was fit for the position. The institution explained that it had not informed the candidate of the issues in advance, as it did not know whether he would pass our assessment.
In consultation with the candidate, we agreed to hold another interview once he had familiarised himself with the issues at play. The institution withdrew the initial nomination. When the candidate was proposed again, we interviewed him and found him fit for the position. In fact, an increasing number of organisations now share relevant knowledge with proposed candidates after they have signed non-disclosure agreements.
Fit and proper assessments
Share:
Share on LinkedIn
Share on X
Share on Facebook
Share via Email
Interesting articles
Fine for CCV Group B.V. for lack of SIRA
21 July 2026
Enforcement measures
De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) discloses its decision of 9 July 2020 to impose an administrative fine on CCV Group B.V. (CCV). DNB also discloses its decisions on CCV’s objection of 13 April 2022 and CCV’s subsequent appeal and higher appeal.
Read more Fine for CCV Group B.V. for lack of SIRA
Enforcement measures
21 July 2026
Prudential rules do not hinder bank financing for EU priorities
17 July 2026
News item supervision
Europe faces historic investment challenges, in which banks will play an important financing role. Prudential requirements strengthen banks’ resilience, without posing a major obstacle to their financing. Unlocking more private finance requires better risk-sharing and deeper financial integration.
Read more Prudential rules do not hinder bank financing for EU priorities
News item supervision
17 July 2026
DNB Inhouse Day for the Dutch banking sector: financial crime supervision
16 July 2026
News item supervision
Following last year’s successful event, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) will again host an Inhouse Day for AML/CFT professionals in the Dutch banking sector. The event is designed to encourage dialogue and provide further insight into DNB’s AML/CFT supervision.
Read more DNB Inhouse Day for the Dutch banking sector: financial crime supervision
News item supervision
16 July 2026
Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years
15 July 2026
News item supervision
Dutch insurers and pension funds are investing more and more in private assets, such as private equity and private credit. By 2025, they had a combined total of €276 billion worth of these investments on their books.
Read more Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years
News item supervision
15 July 2026
Necessary cookies
To ensure the proper operation of the website, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) uses functional cookies and analytics cookies, and has taken measures to ensure that these cookies have little or no impact on the privacy of website users.
Optional cookies
Some pages include embedded content from external websites. These websites may use proprietary (tracking) cookies. This allows third parties to track visitor statistics, show personalised content and display targeted ads, for example.
You can make your choice about allowing these optional cookies both when you first visit the website and when you navigate to a page with embedded content.