2022-10-27

CSA Multilateral Staff Notice 58-314: Review of Disclosure Regarding Women on Boards and in Executive Officer Positions - Year 8 Report

The Canadian Securities Administrators issued this eighth annual report analyzing disclosure trends regarding women on boards and in executive officer positions for TSX-listed issuers. The review found that 24% of board seats were held by women, with significant correlations between diversity targets and higher female representation. Staff recommended that issuers adopt common tabular formats to improve the consistency and comparability of their corporate governance disclosures.

Autorite des marches financiers Quebec logo

Canada

Autorite des marches financiers Quebec

Click to view thumbnail

CSA Multilateral Staff Notice 58-314 Review of Disclosure Regarding Women on Boards and in Executive Officer Positions Year 8 Report October 27, 2022

1 Highlights of review findings at a glance Board seats Executive officer positions Policies and targets Term limits 61% of issuers adopted a policy relating to the representation of women on their board 39% of issuers adopted targets for the representation of women on their board 4% of issuers adopted targets for the representation of women in executive officer positions 24% of board seats were held by women 7% of the chairs of the board were women 45% of vacated board seats were filled by women 5% of issuers had a woman chief executive officer (CEO) 19% of issuers had a woman chief financial officer (CFO) 70% of issuers had at least one woman in an executive officer position 21% of issuers adopted director term limits 35% of issuers adopted other mechanisms of board renewal (but not director term limits) 40% of issuers did not adopt director term limits or other mechanisms of board renewal

2 Disclosure review Purpose of report This report outlines key findings from a recent review of public disclosure regarding women on boards and in executive officer positions as required by Form 58-101F1 Corporate Governance Disclosure of Regulation 58-101 respecting Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (Regulation 58-101). This is the eighth consecutive annual review of this disclosure that we have conducted.1 The review was completed primarily for the purposes of identifying key trends. A qualitative assessment of compliance with the disclosure requirements was not conducted. Disclosure requirements Subject to certain exceptions2 , issuers listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) and other non-venture issuers are required to provide disclosure on an annual basis in the following five areas: The objective of the disclosure requirements is to increase transparency for investors and other stakeholders regarding the representation of women on boards and in executive officer positions, and the approach that issuers take in respect of such representation. 1 The trends from our first seven annual reviews are set out in CSA Multilateral Staff Notices 58-307 (year 1), 58-308 (year 2), 58-309 (year 3), 58-310 (year 4), 58-311 (year 5), 58-312 (year 6) and 58-313 (year 7). 2 Certain TSX listed issuers, such as exchange traded funds, closed-end funds, designated foreign issuers and SEC foreign issuers are not subject to the disclosure requirements. Number and percentage of women on boards and in executive officer roles Targets for the number or percentage of women on its board and in executive officer positions Director term limits and other mechanisms of board renewal Written policies relating to identification and nomination of women directors Consideration of the representation of women when identifying and nominating directors and making executive officer appointments

3 Review sample As of May 31, 2022, approximately 1,779 issuers were listed on the TSX, of which approximately 792 were subject to the disclosure requirements. The data summarized in this report is based on a review sample of 625 issuers that had year-ends between December 31, 2021 and March 31, 2022 (Year 8) and filed information circulars or annual information forms by July 31, 2022. A breakdown of the issuers in the review sample by market capitalization and industry is set out in Annex A.

4 Year-over-year comparison of key trends The following is a snapshot of the year-over-year comparison of the key trends identified in our reviews3 : 3 Due to the scope of our sample, our findings, and the comparisons between the current year and the prior six years provide only a partial picture. The issuers in the current year and the prior year samples vary for several reasons including: • issuers being delisted from the TSX, • issuers’ listings of securities being moved to the TSX-V, • corporate reorganizations resulting in issuers no longer being listed on the TSX, • issuers filing information circulars after July 31, 2022 (Year 8), • issuers completing initial public offerings and becoming listed on the TSX, and • issuers ceasing to be reporting issuers. 4 Where a percentage is not identified in this table for a particular trend in a specific year, it is generally because that trend was not included in our reporting during that year’s review process. Trends4 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Board representation Total board seats occupied by women 11% 12% 14% 15% 17% 20% 22% 24% Chairs of the board who are women -- -- -- -- 5% 6% 6% 7% Board vacancies filled by women -- -- 26% 29% 33% 30% 35% 45% Issuers with at least one woman on their board 49% 55% 61% 66% 73% 79% 82% 87% Issuers with three or more women on their board 8% 10% 11% 13% 15% 20% 24% 30% Board seats occupied by women for issuers with < $1 billion market capitalization 8% 9% 10% 11% 13% 15% 16% 18% Board seats occupied by women for issuers with $1-2 billion market capitalization 11% 13% 17% 19% 20% 24% 24% 27% Board seats occupied by women for issuers with $2-10 billion market capitalization 17% 18% 18% 21% 23% 26% 28% 31% Board seats occupied by women for issuers with over $10 billion market capitalization 21% 23% 24% 25% 27% 31% 30% 33%

5 5 Where a percentage is not identified in this table for a particular trend in a specific year, it is generally because that trend was not included in our reporting during that year’s review process. 6 The decrease in year 5 is driven in part by a change in methodology used to capture executive officer data. Issuers may have included in their disclosure, positions and/or targets for a group other than executive officers, as that term is defined in Regulation 58-101. In year 5, we focused more closely on disclosure regarding “executive officers” as defined. Trends5 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Executive officers Issuers with at least one woman in an executive officer position6 60% 59% 62% 66% 64% 65% 67% 70% Issuers with a woman CEO -- -- -- 4% 4% 5% 5% 5% Issuers with a woman CFO -- -- -- 14% 15% 15% 17% 19% Policies Issuers that adopted a policy relating to the representation of women on their board 15% 21% 35% 42% 50% 54% 60% 61% Targets Issuers that adopted targets for the representation of women on their board 7% 9% 11% 16% 22% 26% 32% 39% Issuers that adopted targets for the representation of women in executive officer positions5 2% 2% 3% 4% 3% 4% 6% 4% Term limits Issuers that adopted director term limits 19% 20% 21% 21% 21% 23% 23% 21%

6 Board seat findings The percentage of board seats held by women increased from 11% in year 1 to 24% in year 8. This year, 580 board seats were vacated during the year and 436 of those seats were filled. Of those filled seats, approximately 45% (196 seats) were filled by women which represents a 10% increase over year 7.

7 Other notable findings Variation among industries The number of women on boards varied by industry. The manufacturing, real estate and utilities industries had the highest percentage of issuers with one or more women on their boards. 7 The mining, oil & gas and biotechnology industries had the lowest percentage of issuers with one or more women on their boards. Refer to Annex B for a year-over-year comparison of the percentage of issuers with one or more women on their boards by industry. 7 The larger Canadian banks, which are part of an industry that has generally been an early adopter of diversity initiatives, are not captured in the data sample for this review.

8 The number of women in executive officer positions also varied by industry. The utilities, manufacturing and retail industries had the highest percentage of issuers with one or more women in executive officer positions. The mining, technology and oil & gas industries had the lowest percentage of issuers with one or more women in executive officer positions. Refer to Annex C for a year-over-year comparison of the percentage of issuers with one or more women in executive officer positions by industry.

9 Diversity measures and board seats held by women There was a correlation between issuers adopting certain diversity measures and the proportion of board seats held by women.

Issuers who set targets for the representation of women on their boards had a greater proportion of board seats held by women. Issuers that adopted board targets had an average of 30% of their board seats held by women, compared to 20% for issuers without targets. Issuers that adopted a written policy relating to the representation of women on their board also tended to have a greater proportion of board seats held by women. Issuers that adopted a policy relating to the representation of women on their boards had an average of 28% of women on their boards, compared to 18% for issuers with no such policy.

10 Term limits Of the 21% of issuers we reviewed that had adopted director term limits, 36% adopted age limits alone, 30% adopted tenure limits alone, and 34% adopted both age and tenure limits. Issuers that adopted term limits had an average of 31% of women on their boards, compared to 22% for issuers with no term limits. Guidance Related to Disclosure Practices During our review, we noted that issuers generally provide disclosure addressing the disclosure requirements in different ways. As a result of this, the format and content of disclosure may vary from issuer to issuer. It may also be difficult to locate the relevant disclosure within an information circular and it may be difficult to interpret some of the disclosure. In order to address this, issuers should consider presenting data related to the disclosure requirements in a common tabular format. This would improve consistency and comparability and help investors identify and evaluate the relevant disclosure in an efficient manner. Refer to CSA Multilateral Staff Notice 58-313 Review of Disclosure Regarding Women on Boards and in Executive Officer Positions (Year 7 Report) for specific guidance on the format of tabular reporting.

11 Questions If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact: Autorité des marchés financiers Martin Latulippe ☏ 514 395-0337, ext.4331 📧📧 martin.latulippe@lautorite.qc.ca Ontario Securities Commission Jo-Anne Matear ☏ 416 593-2323 📧📧 jmatear@osc.gov.on.ca Katie DeBartolo ☏ 416 593-2166 📧📧 kdebartolo@osc.gov.on.ca Jonathan Blackwell ☏ 416 593-8138 📧📧 jblackwell@osc.gov.on.ca Aisha Suleman ☏ 416 593-2324 📧📧 asuleman@osc.gov.on.ca Alberta Securities Commission Nicole Law ☏ 403 355-4865 📧📧 nicole.law@asc.ca Jennifer Smith ☏ 403 355-3898 📧📧 jennifer.smith@asc.ca Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan Heather Kuchuran ☏ 306 787-1009 📧📧 heather.kuchuran@gov.sk.ca The Manitoba Securities Commission Patrick Weeks ☏ 204 945-3326 📧📧 patrick.weeks@gov.mb.ca Financial and Consumer Services Commission (New Brunswick) Ella-Jane Loomis ☏ 506 453-6591 📧📧 ella-jane.loomis@fcnb.ca Nova Scotia Securities Commission Valerie Tracy ☏ 902 424-5718 📧📧 valerie.tracy@novascotia.ca

1 Annex A

2 Annex B The following is a year-over-year comparison of the percentage of issuers with at least one woman on their board by industry: Industry Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Biotechnology 65% 57% 56% 56% 67% 59% 64% 85% Financial Services 59% 67% 60% 61% 73% 77% 85% 86% Manufacturing 60% 68% 84% 89% 93% 93% 95% 98% Mining 35% 38% 54% 59% 62% 72% 78% 80% Oil & Gas 40% 40% 45% 56% 70% 73% 81% 84% Real Estate 64% 66% 59% 73% 80% 90% 89% 91% Retail 78% 79% 89% 84% 86% 91% 94% 88% Technology 39% 52% 52% 68% 73% 84% 74% 86% Utilities 86% 82% 86% 81% 85% 87% 90% 90%

3 Annex C The following is a year-over-year comparison of the percentage of issuers with at least one woman in an executive officer position by industry: Industry Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Biotechnology 48% 66% 71% 64% 61% 73% 82% 71% Financial Services 64% 63% 66% 71% 76% 71% 74% 75% Manufacturing 61% 81% 79% 80% 70% 74% 76% 90% Mining 52% 49% 52% 56% 52% 52% 57% 55% Oil & Gas 49% 46% 48% 53% 54% 58% 58% 66% Real Estate 76% 76% 80% 80% 83% 79% 79% 85% Retail 82% 71% 68% 76% 80% 78% 88% 88% Technology 45% 44% 59% 52% 55% 68% 55% 61% Utilities 65% 73% 67% 75% 70% 75% 79% 92%