2022-02-25
Added · Updated
The Connecticut Banking Commissioner imposes a $250 civil penalty on Marvin Friedman d/b/a Maple End Package Store for operating an unlicensed check-cashing business in violation of Connecticut General Statutes. The entity is prohibited from engaging in check cashing activities without obtaining the appropriate license and must cease such operations immediately. This resolution waives the entity's right to a hearing or judicial review regarding the specific allegation of unlicensed activity.
IN THE MATTER OF: * * MARVIN FRIEDMAN * CONSENT ORDER d/b/a MAPLE END PACKAGE STORE * * (“Maple End”) * *
WHEREAS, the Banking Commissioner (“Commissioner”) is charged with the administration of Part IV of Chapter 668, Sections 36a-580 to 36a-589, inclusive, of the Connecticut General Statutes, “Check Cashing Services”; WHEREAS, Maple End is a Connecticut business with a business address of 192 North Street, Bristol, Connecticut; WHEREAS, Maple End is not currently, nor has it ever been, licensed to engage in the business of cashing checks, drafts or money orders for consideration in Connecticut; WHEREAS, the Commissioner, through the Consumer Credit Division of the Department of Banking, conducted an investigation pursuant to Section 36a-17 of the General Statutes, in effect at such time, into the activities of Maple End to determine if it had violated, was violating or was about to violate the provisions of the Connecticut General Statutes and Regulations within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner; WHEREAS, as a result of such investigation, the Commissioner alleges that Maple End, in or about October 2019, engaged in the business of cashing checks, drafts or money orders for consideration
2 - in Connecticut without licensure at its primary business address, in violation of Section 36a-581(a) of the Connecticut General Statutes; WHEREAS, the Commissioner believes that such allegation would support initiation of enforcement proceedings against Maple End, including proceedings to issue a cease and desist order against Maple End pursuant to Sections 36a-587(b) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 36a-52(a) of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended by Public Act 21-130, and impose a civil penalty of up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per violation on Maple End pursuant to Sections 36a-587(b) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 36a-50(a) of the Connecticut General Statutes, as amended by Public Act 21-130; WHEREAS, initiation of such enforcement proceedings may constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of Section 4-166(4) of the Connecticut General Statutes; WHEREAS, Section 4-177(c) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 36a-1-55(a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies provide that a contested case may be resolved by consent order, unless precluded by law; WHEREAS, Maple End herein represents that upon receiving a notice on or about November 7, 2019 from the financial institution where it held its business account that the financial institution would no longer cash third-party checks, it immediately ceased cashing checks for customers and further represents that it shall not do so without licensure in the future; WHEREAS, both the Commissioner and Maple End acknowledge the possible consequences of formal administrative proceedings, and Maple End voluntarily agrees to consent to the entry of the sanctions imposed below without admitting or denying the allegation contained herein, and solely for the purpose of obviating the need for further formal administrative proceedings concerning the allegation contained herein; WHEREAS, the Commissioner and Maple End now desire to resolve the matters set forth herein;
3 - WHEREAS, Maple End specifically assures the Commissioner that the violation described herein shall not occur in the future; WHEREAS, Maple End acknowledges that this Consent Order is a public record and is a reportable event for purposes of the regulatory disclosure questions on the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Registry (“NMLS”), as applicable; AND WHEREAS, Maple End, through its execution of this Consent Order, voluntarily agrees to waive its procedural rights, including a right to notice and an opportunity for hearing as it pertains to the allegation set forth herein, and voluntarily waives its right to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Consent Order. CONSENT TO ENTRY OF SANCTIONS WHEREAS, Maple End, through its execution of this Consent Order, consents to the Commissioner’s entry of a Consent Order imposing the following sanctions: