2026-05-22
Added · Updated
ML Enterprise Inc. d/b/a Engine by MoneyLion is required to pay a $10,000 civil penalty and comply with Section 36a-556(a) of the 2026 Supplement to the General Statutes for brokering small loans in Connecticut without a license prior to February 1, 2021. The entity must remit the penalty upon execution of the order and cease all small loan brokering activities, which it has already stopped since May 8, 2025. The order resolves the enforcement matter without prejudice to future actions for non-compliance or false representations.
IN THE MATTER OF: ML ENTERPRISE INC. d/b/a ENGINE BY MONEYLION d/b/a HTTPS://FIONA.COM/ f/k/a EVEN FINANCIAL INC. CONSENT ORDER NMLS # 1475872 (“ML Enterprise”) WHEREAS, the Banking Commissioner (“Commissioner”) is charged with the administration of Part III of Chapter 668, Sections 36a-555 to 36a-573, inclusive, of the Connecticut General Statutes, “Small Loan Lending and Related Activities,” as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, Sections 36a-570-1 to 36a-570-17, inclusive, of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies; WHEREAS, ML Enterprise is a Delaware corporation with an office located at 245 West 17th Street, 4th Floor, New York, New York; WHEREAS, ML Enterprise has never been licensed as a small loan company in Connecticut; WHEREAS, the Commissioner, through the Consumer Credit Division of the Department of Banking, conducted an investigation pursuant to Section 36a-17(a) of the Connecticut General Statutes into the activities of ML Enterprise to determine if it had violated, was violating or was about to violate the provisions of the Connecticut General Statutes and Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner; WHEREAS, as a result of such investigation, the Commissioner alleges that, before February 1, 2021, ML Enterprise brokered small loans to prospective Connecticut borrowers without the required license, in violation of Section 36a-556(a)(2) of the Connecticut General Statutes, in effect at such time;
2 - WHEREAS, on January 6, 2020, ML Enterprise applied for a small loan company license in Connecticut through the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Registry (“NMLS”) but voluntarily withdrew the application on March 20, 2020; WHEREAS, on April 13, 2020, ML Enterprise submitted an application through NMLS for a mortgage broker license in Connecticut, in which it listed “consumer loan brokering” as a business activity for Connecticut. On February 1, 2021, ML Enterprise’s mortgage broker license was granted; WHEREAS, ML Enterprise represents that, since May 8, 2025, it has ceased all small loan brokering activity, and ML Enterprise has never made small loans or collected or received payments on small loans in Connecticut; WHEREAS, ML Enterprise has not provided small loan records to the Commissioner in connection with this matter; WHEREAS, the Commissioner believes that such allegation would support initiation of enforcement proceedings against ML Enterprise, including, without limitation, proceedings to issue an order to make restitution against ML Enterprise pursuant to Sections 36a-570(b) and 36a-50(c) of the Connecticut General Statutes, an order to cease and desist against ML Enterprise pursuant to Sections 36a-570(b) and 36a-52(a) of the Connecticut General Statutes, and an order imposing a civil penalty per violation upon ML Enterprise pursuant to Sections 36a-570(b) and 36a-50(a) of the Connecticut General Statutes; WHEREAS, initiation of such enforcement proceedings would constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of Section 4-166(4) of the Connecticut General Statutes. Section 4-177(c) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 36a-1-55(a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies provide that a contested case may be resolved by consent order, unless precluded by law; WHEREAS, the Commissioner and ML Enterprise acknowledge the possible consequences of formal administrative proceedings, and ML Enterprise voluntarily agrees to consent to the entry of the sanctions imposed below without admitting or denying the allegation set forth herein, and solely for the
3 - purpose of obviating the need for formal administrative proceedings concerning the allegation set forth herein; WHEREAS, ML Enterprise acknowledges that it has had the opportunity to consult with and be represented by independent counsel in negotiating and reviewing this Consent Order and executes this Consent Order freely; WHEREAS, the Commissioner and ML Enterprise now desire to resolve the matters set forth herein; WHEREAS, ML Enterprise specifically assures the Commissioner that the violation alleged herein shall not occur in the future; WHEREAS, ML Enterprise acknowledges that this Consent Order is a public record and is a reportable event for purposes of the regulatory disclosure questions on NMLS, as applicable; AND WHEREAS, ML Enterprise, through its execution of this Consent Order, voluntarily agrees to waive its procedural rights, including a right to a notice and an opportunity for a hearing as it pertains to the allegation set forth herein, and voluntarily waives its right to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Consent Order. CONSENT TO ENTRY OF SANCTIONS WHEREAS, ML Enterprise, through its execution of this Consent Order, consents to the Commissioner’s entry of a Consent Order imposing the following sanctions: