2022-09-16
Added · Updated
Torrington Wireless LLC must pay a $5,000 civil penalty in two installments and $1,900 in back-licensing fees to the Connecticut Department of Banking for operating a check-cashing business without a license from January 2019. The entity is prohibited from engaging in check cashing activities without obtaining the appropriate license for each location. The Banking Commissioner will not pursue further enforcement action regarding these specific allegations provided the terms are met, though the order remains a public record and reportable event on NMLS.
IN THE MATTER OF: * * TORRINGTON WIRELESS LLC * CONSENT ORDER NMLS # 1402181 * * (“Respondent”) * *
WHEREAS, the Banking Commissioner (“Commissioner”) is charged with the administration of Part IV of Chapter 668, Sections 36a-580 to 36a-589, inclusive, of the Connecticut General Statutes, “Check Cashing Services”; WHEREAS, Respondent is a Connecticut limited liability company with a business address of 246 North Elm Street, Torrington, Connecticut; WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, Respondent filed an application for a check cashing license in Connecticut with the Commissioner on the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Registry (“NMLS”); WHEREAS, Respondent previously maintained a check cashing license in this state from October 23, 2008 until January 1, 2019; WHEREAS, the Commissioner, through the Consumer Credit Division of the Department of Banking, conducted an investigation pursuant to Section 36a-17 of the General Statutes, in effect at such time, into the activities of Respondent to determine if it had violated, was violating or was about to violate the provisions of the Connecticut General Statutes and Regulations within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner;
2 - WHEREAS, as a result of such investigation, the Commissioner alleges that from January 2019 until the current license application, Respondent engaged in the business of cashing checks, drafts or money orders for consideration in Connecticut without licensure at its primary business address, in violation of Section 36a-581(a) of the Connecticut General Statutes; WHEREAS, the Commissioner believes that such allegation would support initiation of enforcement proceedings against Respondent, including proceedings to issue a cease and desist order against Respondent pursuant to Section 36a-587(b) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 36a-52(a) of the 2022 Supplement to the General Statutes, and impose a civil penalty of up to one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per violation on Respondent pursuant to Section 36a-587(b) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 36a-50(a) of the 2022 Supplement to the General Statutes; WHEREAS, initiation of such enforcement proceedings may constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of Section 4-166(4) of the Connecticut General Statutes; WHEREAS, Section 4-177(c) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 36a-1-55(a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies provide that a contested case may be resolved by consent order, unless precluded by law; WHEREAS, both the Commissioner and Respondent acknowledge the possible consequences of formal administrative proceedings, and Respondent voluntarily agrees to consent to the entry of the sanctions imposed below without admitting or denying the allegation contained herein, and solely for the purpose of obviating the need for further formal administrative proceedings concerning the allegation contained herein; WHEREAS, the Commissioner and Respondent now desire to resolve the matters set forth herein; WHEREAS, Respondent specifically assures the Commissioner that the violation described herein shall not occur in the future; WHEREAS, Respondent acknowledges that this Consent Order is a public record and is a reportable event for purposes of the regulatory disclosure questions on NMLS, as applicable;
3 - AND WHEREAS, Respondent, through its execution of this Consent Order, voluntarily agrees to waive its procedural rights, including a right to notice and an opportunity for hearing as it pertains to the allegation set forth herein, and voluntarily waives its right to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Consent Order. CONSENT TO ENTRY OF SANCTIONS WHEREAS, Respondent, through its execution of this Consent Order, consents to the Commissioner’s entry of a Consent Order imposing the following sanctions: