2022-12-15
Added · Updated
Canadian Securities Administrators staff (CSA staff) are publishing this notice to set out their views on amending securities laws to require T+1 settlement for mutual funds, concurrent with draft amendments to Regulation 24-101 facilitating the shortening of the standard settlement cycle for equity and long-term debt to T+1. While the CSA expects secondary market trading in exchange-listed investment funds to settle on T+1, they are not proposing to amend Regulation 81-102 to mandate T+1 for primary distributions and redemptions of mutual fund securities at this time. Instead, CSA staff encourage mutual funds to voluntarily settle primary distributions and redemptions on T+1 where practicable, recognizing the operational difficulties for funds with significant holdings in longer settlement cycle jurisdictions.
-1- CSA Staff Notice 81-335 Investment Fund Settlement Cycles December 15, 2022 Executive Summary Canadian Securities Administrators staff (CSA staff or we) are publishing this notice to set out our views about amending securities laws to require settlement one day after the date of the trade (T+1) for mutual funds. Concurrent with this Notice, the CSA are publishing for comment draft amendments (the Regulation 24-101 Amendments) to Regulation 24-101 respecting Institutional Trade Matching and Settlements (Regulation 24-101). Among other things, the Regulation 24-101 Amendments focus on facilitating the shortening of the standard settlement cycle for equity and long-term debt market trades in Canada from two days after the date of a trade (T+2) to T+1. The move to a T+1 settlement cycle is expected to occur at the same time as the markets in the United States move to a T+1 settlement cycle. The Regulation 24-101 Amendments focus on facilitating procedures and processes to allow for alignment with the U.S. settlement cycle. Following the changeover, it is expected that secondary market trading in exchange-listed investment funds will also settle on T+1. We are not proposing to amend sections 9.4 and 10.4 of Regulation 81-102 respecting Investment Funds (Regulation 81-102) at this time to shorten the settlement cycle for primary distributions and redemptions of mutual fund securities. If the standard settlement cycle for listed securities moves from two days to one day in Canada, we are of the view that, where practicable, mutual funds should settle primary distributions and redemptions of their securities on T+1 voluntarily. We think it is important, however, to enable each mutual fund to have flexibility to determine whether a T+1 settlement cycle can work for them. Requiring a T+1 settlement cycle in Regulation 81-102 would not allow for such flexibility. Substance and Purpose Moving the settlement of trades in mutual fund securities to T+1 requires consideration of different factors, as the settlement mechanics for mutual fund primary distributions and redemptions differs from those for equity and long-term debt. For example, the purchase or redemption of securities directly with a fund can raise issues related to the fund’s liquidity and directly impact the portfolio management of the fund since portfolio assets may need to be purchased or sold. Mutual funds with significant holdings of securities in jurisdictions with longer settlement cycles (e.g., Europe and Asia) may experience a settlement mismatch if T+1 settlement were to be mandated for all mutual fund securities in Canada. CSA staff are of the view that many Canadian mutual funds would be able to settle primary distributions and redemptions of their securities on T+1 if the standard settlement for portfolio assets held by the fund move to T+1 in Canada. In our view, moving to T+1 would allow the
-2- mutual fund industry to improve investor and dealer cashflow management, align with U.S. settlement cycles, and allow mutual funds to remain competitive from a settlement perspective. However, we recognize that moving to T+1 settlement would present operational difficulties for funds that have a significant portion of their portfolio assets that settle at T+2 or longer and so the CSA is not proposing amendments to sections 9.4 and 10.4 of Regulation 81-102 to mandate a T+1 settlement cycle for all mutual fund securities at this time. Questions Please refer your questions to any of the following: Autorité des marchés financiers Louis-Martin Ouellet Coordinator, Investment Funds Oversight 514 395-0337, ext. 4496 louis-martin.ouellet@lautorite.qc.ca British Columbia Securities Commission Noreen Bent Chief, Corporate Finance Legal Services 604 899-6741 Nbent@bcsc.bc.ca Alberta Securities Commission Chad Conrad Senior Legal Counsel, Corporate Finance 403 297-4295 chad.conrad@asc.ca Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan Heather Kuchuran Director, Corporate Finance 306 787-1009 heather.kuchuran@gov.sk.ca Manitoba Securities Commission Patrick Weeks Deputy Director, Corporate Finance 204 945-3326 Patrick.weeks@gov.mb.ca Ontario Securities Commission Michael Tang Senior Legal Counsel, Investment Funds and Structured Products Branch 416 593-2330 mtang@osc.gov.on.ca
-3- Financial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick Ella-Jane Loomis Senior Legal Counsel, Securities 506 453-6591 ella-jane.loomis@fcnb.ca Nova Scotia Securities Commission Abel Lazarus Director, Corporate Finance 902 424-6859 abel.lazarus@novascotia.ca