2009-01-02
Added · Updated
The Securities and Futures Commission issued revised advertising guidelines for collective investment schemes authorized under specific product codes, requiring compliance by January 2009. The document mandates that all advertisements be clear, fair, and balanced, prohibiting misleading claims, guaranteed returns, or denigration of competitors while enforcing strict standards for performance data presentation and risk disclosures. Issuers remain fully responsible for advertisement accuracy and must include prominent warning statements regarding investment risks and the non-recommendation nature of regulatory authorization.
Annex 2 Securities and Futures Commission Advertising Guidelines Applicable to Collective Investment Schemes Authorized under the Product Codes Hong Kong July 2008 Published by Securities & Futures Commission 8" Floor, Chater House 8 Connaught Road Central Hong Kong Tel : 2840 9222 Fax : 2521 7836
Explanatory Notes: These Guidelines shall become effective on 1 August 2008 (the Effective Date”). Advertisement issuers may continue to follow the advertising guidelines included in the respective Product Codes that are in effect prior to the Effective Date until 31 December 2008, but shall adopt and comply with these Guidelines starting from 1 January 2009.
Advertising Guidelines Applicable to Collective Investment Schemes Authorized under the Product Codes DEFINITIONS Unless otherwise defined, words and expressions used in this set of Advertising Guidelines are as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap 571) (the “SFO”) and the following codes, as appropriate: a) Code on Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds (“UT Code™) (b) Code on Investment-Linked Assurance Schemes (“ILAS Code”) (c) Code on Pooled Retirement Funds (“PRF Code™) (d SFC Code on MPF Products (“MPF Code”) (collectively, the “Product Codes”) APPLICATION OF THE ADVERTISING GUIDELINES This set of Advertising Guidelines is applicable to collective investment schemes authorized by the Commission under any of the Product Codes (“schemes”). Issuers of advertisements for a scheme (including, for the avoidance of doubt, licensed and registered persons acting as distributors of the scheme), whether the advertisements are authorized by the Commission pursuant to section 105 of the SFO or the advertisements fall within any exemption from authorization under the SFO, are required to follow the guidelines as set out below. Issuers are responsible for the contents of their scheme advertisements and the monitoring of their publication / distribution. Under no circumstances may an issuer disclaim its liabilities in respect of the accuracy of the contents of its advertisements. Where the information is sourced externally and disclosed as such, the issuer should have reasonable belief that such information is accurate, complete and up-to-date. These guidelines are intended to apply to all forms of product advertisements, including but not limited to distribution materials (such as print media advertisements, brochures, fact sheets, newsletters and any other regular updates, direct marketing, “fax on demand” services, etc), display-only materials (such as posters, exhibition panels, outdoor displays, etc), broadcasts (such as radio, television, cinema, etc) and interactive systems (such as the internet, interactive voice message systems, etc). Examples of practical applications of these guidelines can be found in the Frequently Asked Questions on Advertising Materials of Collective Investment Schemes Authorized under the Product Codes as published by the Commission on the website from time to time.
Issuers are welcome to consult the Commission where there is doubt as to the applications of these guidelines on specific issues. While the Commission will respond to questions on interpretation of the guidelines, it should not be expected to answer purely hypothetical questions. CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS General Principles
Example: An advertisement for a scheme, which carried a special risk warning in its offering document, that suggests it is of low risk would be misleading. An advertisement should not seek to denigrate a scheme’s competitors in such a way as might lower the reputation of the industry, or use language or artwork that would be considered by a reasonable person to be in poor taste. Performance Information 10. 11. 12. Performance information, including charts, graphs and tables, should use either the first or last business day of each month or the first or last dealing day of the scheme in each month as the reference date. For regular publications that are updated on a weekly or more frequent basis (e.g. website), performance information may use the most recent dealing day as the reference date. In any case, the reference date should not be arbitrary. The computation basis should be stated (e.g. offer-to-offer or NAV-to-NAV, with or without dividends reinvested). All performance information, including awards and rankings, should be referenced to the sources and dated. Rankings and award winnings may be quoted from any recognized or published external source. For peer group comparisons, only one source should be used and a clear description of the peer group should be included in the advertisement. No forecast of the scheme’s performance may be presented. A substantiated prospective yield is generally acceptable only for schemes that invest substantially in fixed income securities, money market instruments, real estate investment trusts or other investments that provide regular and stable distributions. The disclosure of prospective yield must be accompanied by a disclosure of its calculation basis as well as a warning statement to the effect that a positive distribution yield does not imply a positive return. Performance information of a scheme may be presented only if it has an investment track record of not less than 6 months. Performance information, if presented, should at a minimum include the returns (e.g. NAV / price returns, where applicable) of the immediately preceding 5 years (or, subject to paragraph 11 above, the period since launch if shorter), presented based on complete 12-month periods (or shorter periods for the earliest / latest period presented). Such information constitutes the “minimum performance information” and further performance information may be presented in addition. : Note: (1) Minimum performance information may be made up to a recent reference date, the last calendar year end date or the last financial year end date of the scheme. If the calendar or financial year end date is used, performance information of the latest part-year (being
year-to-date) should also be presented to ensure that the information is up-to-date. (2) Subject to paragraph 14 below, minimum performance information may be included in the notes to the advertisements. Less-than-one-year’s figure(s) quoted in an advertisement should be of at least 3 months in duration, except as required in paragraph 12 or permitted in paragraph 14, and presented in the same format as and no more prominently than the most recent 1-year figure (or since launch figure if the scheme has a track record of shorter than 1 year). Regular publications such as a regularly issued fact sheet may contain performance figures of the latest periods (e.g. latest month, latest quarter, yearto-date, etc), provided such figures are clearly for information purposes and are presented in the same format as and no more prominently than other figures. Performance information on an advertisement should be up to date and no more than 6 months old except for print media advertisements, broadcasts or interactive systems, which should be no more than 3 months old. In all circumstances, information should be updated if more recent information is significantly different. Example: A variation of 10% or more from that last published statistics to the current performance figure would be considered significant. Performance information must be actual rather than based on simulated results. Hypothetical figures may be permitted for schemes with complicated mechanisms for the purpose of explaining those mechanisms to investors, in which case, such figures must be conservative and the worst-case scenario of the payout mechanism, if any, must be presented. Also, it must be clearly stated to the effect that the figures used are for illustrative purposes only and are not indicative of the actual return likely to be achieved. Annualized returns are only acceptable for presentation of performance figures for periods of more than 1 year. Comparison of Performance and Use of Comparative Indices 17. When a scheme is compared to an index, such index should be the benchmark for the scheme as disclosed in the offering document or, if no such benchmark is disclosed in the offering documents, an index which most closely reflects the investment focus of the scheme. The index used should be transparent and published. A customized index is only acceptable if it is created based on multiple indices for the purpose of reflecting more fairly the composition of the scheme’s investment portfolio and its creation basis is disclosed clearly in the advertisement. A comparative index, once adopted, should be applied consistently and any change should be supported by adequate justification.
A comparison of performance figures should be fair, accurate and relevant, comparing “like with like”. Examples: Performance of a Hong Kong equity fund against a global index or money market fund would be misleading. However, a performance comparison of different indices, such as a Hong Kong index against a global index, used in an appropriate context, would not be misleading. For comparison against the performance of an accumulation share class of a scheme or where a scheme does not make distributions, a total return index (which includes both dividends and distributions), but not its price return version, should be used, if available. If a total return index is not available, the advertisements should disclose clearly the respective calculation bases of the scheme performance and the index used. If graphs are shown, they should be clearly presented without distortion. If different sets of data are plotted on the same graph for comparison purpose, the same axis should be used. Performance Information Denominated in a Foreign Currency 20. If non-US$/HKS$ denominated returns are shown, the advertisement should also show the returns in US$/HKS terms. Alternatively, the advertisement should include a statement to alert investors to the effect that “The investment returns are denominated in [foreign currency]. US/HK dollar-based investors are therefore exposed to fluctuations in the US/HK dollar / [foreign currency] exchange rate”. If performance information is quoted in another currency for comparison with other schemes, either the performance information in the scheme’s base currency or a disclosure of the scheme’s base currency and the basis of currency conversion should be given. Changes to a Scheme 21. If there has been a change in the operations of a scheme, such as a merger, a restructuring, a change of management companies or their delegates, or a change in its investment objectives or policies or comparative index, where such change has a significant impact on the scheme’s performance (or its presentation), any presentation of performance information prior to such change should be accompanied by a prominent explanation in the disclosure that is appropriate in the context of the advertisement to ensure such presentation is not misleading. : Example: If a scheme has changed its comparative index because there exists a new index which more closely reflects the investment focus of the scheme than the old index, its advertisements may present the performance of the old index for the past periods with a clear
disclosure of the change, including a description of the old and the new indices and the effective date of the change. Performance Information of an Unauthorized Scheme 22. Reference to past performance of an unauthorized scheme to indicate the management company’s past track record can only be used in the following circumstances: (a) the authorized scheme is newly launched with a past track record of less than 6 months; (b) the investment objectives of the unauthorized scheme are substantially the same as the authorized scheme, managed by the same management team with similar investment policies and strategies and thus subject to similar level of risk; and (c) the advertisement makes clear that (i) the performance figures quoted are not those of the authorized scheme; (ii) whether the unauthorized scheme is subject to any significantly different terms (e.g. different/lower fees and charges); and (iii) the unauthorized scheme is not authorized by the Commission in Hong Kong and not available to the public of Hong Kong . Warning Statements / Notes to Prospective Investors 23. Advertisements should contain warning statements / notes: (2) (b) © (d) to the effect that investment involves risk; that the offering document should be read for further details including the risk factors; and (where past performance is presented) to the effect that the past performance information presented is not indicative of future performance; and Note: Where performance information is provided for discretionary benefit schemes, a statement should appear to the effect that the rates of return of the scheme are declared at the discretion of a named party (authorized insurer or other party) which may not be the same as the actual returns of the scheme’s underlying assets. : (where the advertisement is exempted from pre-vetting and authorization by the Commission pursuant to the SFO) that the advertisement has not been reviewed by the Commission.
The text of the warning statements and footnotes may be varied but the message should be clear and not disguised. If a scheme is described as having been authorized by the Commission it must be stated that authorization does not imply official recommendation. Warning statements and footnotes should be well positioned and, where applicable, properly referenced in the advertisement (e.g. at the first point of access of a website, by way of properly reference endnotes, etc). In any event, warning statements and footnotes must be legible in the context of (i) font sizes used; (ii) format and layout of the advertisement; and (iii) where the advertisement is displayed or published. Advertisements of a scheme with special features or involving higher risk investments (e.g. emerging markets, use of financial derivative instruments for investment purposes, etc) should include a warning statement appropriate to the degree of risk inherent in the scheme. Issuers of advertisements should “also refer to relevant provisions in applicable Product Code(s) in respect of the specific disclosure requirements for special features of the scheme. The Commission may require additional warning statements to be included in the advertisements of individual or specific types of schemes, where appropriate. Note: The following materials need not include warning statements or disclosures that are specific to a particular scheme provided that they include the warning statements referred to in paragraph 23: (a) display-only materials that are not for distribution; and (b) regular publications that include a listing of schemes and their factual information for comparison or information purposes only. Information of the Advertisement Issuer 28. The full name of the issuer must be disclosed on all advertisements, except as permitted in paragraph 29(a). MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS Rules applicable to Radio, Television, Cinema or Other Time-limiting Advertisements / Broadcasts 29. The following are applicable to advertisements, the recipients of which have no control over the time for information delivery (e.g. radio, television, cinema broadcasts, etc): (a) For audio advertisements with no visual display, warning statements referred to in paragraph 23 should be audibly and clearly read out in a
(b) © voice-over at the end of each broadcast. The broadcast of the full name of the issuer under paragraph 28 is optional for such audio advertisements. For visual advertisements, warning statements referred to in paragraph 23 and the full name of the issuer referred to in paragraph 28 should be displayed for such time as to be sufficiently prominent to allow the viewer to read the entire text of the disclosure with reasonable ease. The advertisement should not be disguised as an authoritative report, and should be presented with courtesy and good taste. Disturbing or annoying materials such as blatant sound effects, persistent repetition, or words and phrases implying emergency should be avoided.