2026-07-31
Added
Kane Financial Planning, LLC, an investment adviser, entered into a Stipulation and Agreement with the Connecticut Banking Commissioner to resolve a violation of Section 36b-6(d) of the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act. The firm transacted investment advisory business from an unregistered branch office in Avon, Connecticut, which was discovered during a March 25, 2026 examination. Under the agreement, Kane must pay an administrative fine of $2,500 and a $125 reimbursement for a past due branch office registration fee, totaling $2,625, by July 28, 2026. Additionally, Kane and its affiliates must refrain from future violations of the Act or any related regulations, rules, or orders.
IN THE MATTER OF: *
WHEREAS, the Banking Commissioner (“Commissioner”) is charged with the administration of Chapter 672a of the General Statutes of Connecticut, the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (“Act”), as amended, and Sections 36b-31-2 to 36b-31-33, inclusive, of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (“Regulations”) promulgated under the Act; WHEREAS, Kane Financial Planning, LLC (“Kane”) is an investment adviser with its principal office at 222 North Hollow Road, East Hartland, Connecticut 06027. Kane has been registered as an investment adviser under the Act since May 6, 2016; WHEREAS, on March 25, 2026, the Commissioner, through the Securities and Business Investments Division (“Division”) of the Department of Banking, conducted an examination of Kane (“Examination”); WHEREAS, during the Examination, the Division ascertained that Kane was transacting investment advisory business from an Avon, Connecticut office without such office being registered as a branch office, in contravention of Section 36b-6(d) the Act, including using the Avon address on its marketing materials. Although the Avon location was disclosed on Kane’s Form ADV under “Other Offices”, it was not registered as a branch office in Connecticut; WHEREAS, Section 36b-6(d) of the Act provides, in pertinent part, that “[n]o . . . investment adviser shall transact business from any place of business located within this state unless that place of business is registered as a branch office with the commissioner pursuant to this subsection”;
2 - WHEREAS, after the Division put Kane on notice of the violation of Section 36b-6(d), Kane immediately eliminated all references to the Avon address in anything related to the firm; WHEREAS, the Commissioner believes that a violation of Sections 36b-6(d) of the Act would support the initiation of administrative proceedings against Kane pursuant to Section 36b-15(a) of the 2026 Supplement to the General Statutes and Section 36b-27 of the Act; WHEREAS, an administrative proceeding initiated under Section 36b-15(a) of the 2026 Supplement to the General Statutes and Section 36b-27 would constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of Section 4-166(4) of the General Statutes of Connecticut; WHEREAS, Section 4-177(c) of the General Statutes of Connecticut and Section 36a-1-55(a) of the Regulations provide that a contested case may be resolved by stipulation or agreed settlement, unless precluded by law; WHEREAS, Kane desires to settle the matters described herein and voluntarily enters into this Stipulation and Agreement; WHEREAS, the Commissioner and Kane acknowledge that this Stipulation and Agreement is in lieu of any court action or administrative proceeding against Kane, its members, officers, employees, agents, or representatives adjudicating any issue of fact or law on the matters described herein and is being made to settle only the matters described herein; WHEREAS, without admitting or denying the allegations contained herein, Kane expressly consents to the Commissioner’s jurisdiction under the Act and to the terms of this Stipulation and Agreement; WHEREAS, Kane, through its execution of this Stipulation and Agreement, voluntarily waives any rights Kane may have to seek judicial review or otherwise challenge or contest the terms and conditions of this Stipulation and Agreement;
3 - WHEREAS, Kane acknowledges that it has had the opportunity to consult with and be represented by independent counsel in negotiating and reviewing this Stipulation and Agreement and enters into this Stipulation and Agreement freely; AND WHEREAS, Kane, through its execution of this Stipulation and Agreement, specifically assures the Commissioner that the violation alleged herein shall not occur in the future. NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
More like this from CTDOB
CTDOB published 3 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.