Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations; Defining Mutual Funds as Financial Institutions

26996 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Proposed Rules

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
4. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended]
5. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD: PILATUS Aircraft Ltd.: Docket No. FAA– 2009–0509; Directorate Identifier 2009– CE–029–AD. Comments Due Date (a) We must receive comments by July 6,

Affected ADs (b) None. Applicability (c) This AD applies to PC–7 airplanes, all manufacturer serial numbers, certificated in any category. Subject (d) Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 53: Fuselage. Reason (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) states: This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is prompted due to reported corrosion on the bolts and in the bores of the attachment fittings for the engine mounting frame. The corrosion is caused by damaged cadmium plating of the bolts or damaged surface finish of the attachment fitting. Such a condition, if left uncorrected, could lead to crack initiation at the bolt and the fitting bore and subsequently to the failure of the engine attachment fitting. In order to correct and control the situation, this AD requires a visual inspection of the relevant bolts and fittings. Additionally, the replacement of the bolts is required. Actions and Compliance (f) Unless already done, do the following actions: (1) Visually inspect the bolts and the bores (with boroscope) of the attachment fittings for the engine mounting frame following paragraph 3.A of PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC–7 Service Bulletin No. 53–006, dated November 17, 2008, at whichever of the following occurs later: (i) Upon accumulating 5,000 hours total time-in-service (TIS) or 5 years from the date of manufacture, whichever occurs first; or (ii) Within the next 6 months after the effective date of this AD. (2) If no sign of corrosion is found during the inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, replace the bolts. Repetitively inspect thereafter at intervals not to exceed every 5 years following PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC– 7 Maintenance Manual Chapter 05–10–20, page 4, dated November 30, 2008. (3) If any sign of corrosion is found during any of the inspections required in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, do the corrective actions following paragraph 3.A. of PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC–7 Service Bulletin No. 53–006, dated November 17, 2008. Repetitively inspect thereafter at intervals not to exceed every 5 years following PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC–7 Maintenance Manual Chapter 05–10–20, page 4, dated November 30, 2008. FAA AD Differences Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ or service information as follows: No differences. Other FAA AD Provisions (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329– 4090. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056. Related Information (h) Refer to MCAI FOCA AD HB–2009–004, dated May 12, 2009; PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. Pilatus PC–7 Service Bulletin No. 53–006, dated November 17, 2008; and Pilatus PC–7 Maintenance Manual Chapter 05–10–20, page 4, dated November 30, 2008, for related information. Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 29, 2009. Scott A. Horn, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E9–13139 Filed 6–4–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 31 CFR Part 103 RIN 1506–AA93 Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations; Defining Mutual Funds as Financial Institutions AGENCY: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (‘‘FinCEN’’), Treasury. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and request for comments. SUMMARY: FinCEN is proposing to include mutual funds within the general definition of ‘‘financial institution’’ in rules implementing the Bank Secrecy Act (‘‘BSA’’). The proposal would subject mutual funds to rules under the BSA on the filing of Currency Transaction Reports (‘‘CTRs’’) and on the creation, retention, and transmittal of records or information for transmittals of funds. DATES: Written comments on all aspects of this notice are welcome and must be received on or before September 3, 2009. ADDRESSES: Those submitting comments are encouraged to do so via the Internet. Comments submitted via the Internet may be submitted at http:// www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp with the caption in the body of the text, Attention: Comment Request; Defining Mutual Funds as Financial Institutions. Comments also may be submitted by written mail to: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Department of the Treasury, P.O. Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183, Attention: Comment Request; Defining Mutual Funds as Financial Institutions. Please submit comments by one method only. All comments submitted in response to this notice of proposed rulemaking will become a VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:06 Jun 04, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM 05JNP1 erowe on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS-1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Proposed Rules 26997 1Language expanding the scope of the BSA was added by the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (‘‘USA PATRIOT Act’’), Public Law 107–56. 2 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2)(I). 3See 15 U.S.C. 80a–3. 4 15 U.S.C. 80a–4; 15 U.S.C. 80a–5(a)(1); 15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a)(32). Face-amount certificate companies and unit investment trusts are excluded from the definition of ‘‘management company.’’ 15 U.S.C. 80a–4(3). 5Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Mutual Funds, 67 FR 21117 (April 29, 2002). 6Customer Identification Programs for Mutual Funds, 68 FR 25131 (May 9, 2003). 7Amendment to the Bank Secrecy Act Regulations—Requirement That Mutual Funds Report Suspicious Activity, 71 FR 26213 (May 4, 2006). 8Anti-Money Laundering Programs; Special Due Diligence Programs for Certain Foreign Accounts, 71 FR 496 (January 4, 2006); Anti-Money Laundering Programs; Special Due Diligence Programs for Certain Foreign Accounts, 72 FR 44768 (August 9, 2007). 9See 31 U.S.C. 5312(a)(2). 10See 31 CFR 103.22; 31 CFR 103.28; 31 CFR 103.29; 31 CFR 103.33; and 31 CFR 103.38. Defining a business as a financial institution also could make the business ineligible for exemption from the requirement to file CTRs. See 31 CFR 103.22(d)(5)(viii). 11 31 CFR 103.30(a)(1)(i). In addition to coin and currency of the United States or of any other country, ‘‘currency’’ includes cashier’s checks, bank drafts, traveler’s checks, and money orders in face amounts of $10,000 or less, if the instruments are received in a ‘‘designated reporting transaction.’’ 31 CFR 103.30(c)(1)(ii)(A). A ‘‘designated reporting transaction’’ is defined as the retail sale of a consumer durable, collectible, or travel or entertainment activity. 31 CFR 103.30(c)(2). In addition, a mutual fund would need to treat the instruments as currency if the mutual fund knows that a customer is using the instruments to avoid the reporting of a transaction on Form 8300. 31 CFR 103.30(c)(1)(ii)(B). 12 31 CFR 103.30(a). The rule defines ‘‘related transactions’’ to include transactions conducted between a payer or its agent and the recipient of the currency in a 24-hour period. 31 CFR 103.30(c)(12)(ii). Transactions conducted during a period of more than 24 hours are related if the recipient knows or has reason to know that each transaction is one of a series of connected transactions. 31 CFR 103.30(c)(12)(ii). In addition, the rule includes provisions on the treatment of multiple deposits or installment payments relating to a single transaction. See 31 CFR 103.30(b). 13 31 CFR 103.30(a)(1)(ii) (the requirement to file a Form 8300 does not apply to transactions reported under 31 CFR 103.22). 14See 31 CFR 103.22(b)(1) and 31 CFR 103.11(h) (currency is defined as the coin and paper of the United States or of any other country that is designated as legal tender and that circulates and Continued matter of public record; therefore, you should submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. Inspection of comments: Comments may be inspected, between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., in the FinCEN reading room in Vienna, VA. Persons wishing to inspect the comments submitted must request an appointment with the Disclosure Officer by telephoning (703) 905–5034 (Not a toll free call). In general, FinCEN makes all comments publicly available by posting them on http:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FinCEN regulatory helpline at (800) 949–2732 and select Option 6. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background A. Statutory Provisions The Bank Secrecy Act, Public Law 91–508, codified as amended at 12 U.S.C. 1829b, 12 U.S.C. 1951–1959, and 31 U.S.C. 5311–5314; 5316–5332, authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury (‘‘Secretary’’) to issue regulations requiring financial institutions to keep records and file reports that are determined to have a high degree of usefulness in criminal, tax, and regulatory investigations or proceedings, or in the conduct of intelligence or counter-intelligence activities, including analysis, to protect against international terrorism, and to implement anti-money laundering programs and compliance procedures.1 Regulations implementing the BSA appear at 31 CFR Part 103. The authority of the Secretary to administer the BSA has been delegated to the Director of FinCEN. The definition of ‘‘financial institution’’ in the BSA includes investment companies.2 FinCEN has the authority to issue rules defining investment companies as financial institutions. The Investment Company Act of 1940, codified at 15 U.S.C. 80a– 1 et seq. (the ‘‘Investment Company Act’’), defines ‘‘investment company’’ 3 and subjects investment companies to regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’). B. Overview of Current Regulatory Provisions Regulations implementing the BSA currently apply only to investment companies that are ‘‘open-end companies,’’ as the term is defined in the Investment Company Act. More commonly known as mutual funds, open-end companies are the predominant type of investment company. Open-end companies are management companies that offer or have outstanding securities that are redeemable at net asset value.4 On April 29, 2002, FinCEN issued a rule under section 352 of the USA PATRIOT Act prescribing minimum standards for the development of anti￾money laundering programs by mutual funds.5 On May 9, 2003, FinCEN issued jointly with the SEC a rule under section 326 of the USA PATRIOT Act requiring mutual funds to implement customer identification programs.6 On May 4, 2006, FinCEN issued a rule requiring mutual funds to report suspicious transactions.7 On August 9, 2007, FinCEN completed the anti￾money laundering rules required with respect to certain financial institutions, including mutual funds, under section 312 of the USA PATRIOT Act.8 These rules require mutual funds to establish due diligence programs for correspondent and private banking accounts. Although FinCEN has issued individual rules that apply to mutual funds, FinCEN has not included mutual funds within the definition of ‘‘financial institution’’ at 31 CFR 103.11(n). The definition of ‘‘financial institution’’ at 31 CFR 103.11(n) is less inclusive than the definition in the BSA itself.9 The regulatory definition determines the scope of rules that require the filing of CTRs and the creation, retention, and transmittal of records or information on transmittals of funds and other specified transactions.10 II. Section-by-Section Analysis A. Sections 103.11(n)(10) and 103.11(ccc)—Mutual Funds Move From Filing Form 8300 to the Currency Transaction Report The proposed amendment would add mutual funds to the regulatory definition of ‘‘financial institution’’ at 31 CFR 103.11(n)(10). FinCEN is also proposing to add a general definition of a ‘‘mutual fund’’ at 31 CFR 103.11(ccc). The definition of ‘‘mutual fund’’ would cover only those entities registered or required to register with the SEC. Specifically, ‘‘mutual fund’’ would be defined as: An ‘‘investment company’’ (as the term is defined in section 3 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3)) that is an ‘‘open-end company’’ (as that term is defined in section 5 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–5)) registered or required to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission under section 8 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–8). Mutual funds currently file reports on Form 8300 for the receipt of more than $10,000 in currency.11 The requirement applies to currency received in one transaction or two or more related transactions.12 The proposed amendment would replace this requirement with a requirement to file CTRs under 31 CFR 103.22.13 A mutual fund would file a CTR for a transaction involving a transfer of more than $10,000 in currency by, through, or to the mutual fund.14 The CTR filing VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:06 Jun 04, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM 05JNP1 erowe on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS-1

26998 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Proposed Rules is customarily used as a medium of exchange in a foreign country). 15See 31 CFR 103.22(c)(2). 16 31 CFR 103.22(c)(2). The obligation to file a CTR is conditioned on knowledge that the transactions are conducted by or on behalf of the same person and result in either cash in or cash out totaling more than $10,000 during any one business day. 17 In determining whether to file a Form 8300, a mutual fund may need to treat instruments as currency if the mutual fund knows that a customer is using the instruments to avoid the reporting of a transaction on Form 8300, in which case the mutual fund also may need to file a suspicious activity report (‘‘SAR’’). See 31 CFR 103.30(c)(1)(ii)(B) and 31 CFR 103.15(a)(2). 18A review of BSA data revealed that while hundreds of millions of transactions involving mutual funds were conducted in calendar years 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007, fewer than 19,500 Form 8300s were filed by mutual funds over the same period. 19Anti-Money Laundering Programs for Mutual Funds, 67 FR 21117, 21118 (April 29, 2002). 20A mutual fund could report a suspicious transaction voluntarily by checking box 1(b) in the Form 8300. A mutual fund is required to file a SAR reporting the transaction, however, if the transaction exceeds the threshold set forth in the rule requiring mutual funds to report suspicious transactions. See 31 CFR 103.15(a)(2). 21See 31 CFR 103.33(f) and (g). Financial institutions must retain records for a period of five years. 31 CFR 103.38(d). 22Rules under the BSA define a ‘‘transmittal of funds’’ and the persons or institutions involved in a ‘‘transmittal of funds.’’ See 31 CFR 103.11(d), (e), (q), (r), (s), (v), (w), (cc), (dd), (jj), (kk), (ll), and (mm). 23See 31 CFR 103.33(f)(1)(i) and (f)(2). 24See 31 CFR 103.33(f)(3) (information that the recipient’s financial institution must obtain or retain). 25See 31 CFR 103.33(g) (information that must ‘‘travel’’ with the transmittal order); 31 CFR 103.11(kk) (defining ‘‘transmittal order’’). 26See 31 CFR 103.33(e)(6)(i) and 31 CFR 103.33(f)(6)(i). 27See 31 CFR 103.33(a)–(c). Financial institutions must retain these records for a period of five years. 31 CFR 103.38(d). 28See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. 80a–30 (mutual funds); 15 U.S.C. 78q(a)(3) (transfer agents). 29Mutual fund transfer agents are not subject to the Travel Rule or related recordkeeping requirements. Nevertheless, FinCEN has noted the role of transfer agents in performing BSA compliance functions. See e.g., 71 FR 26213, (May 4, 2006) (adopting release for mutual fund SAR rule), 68 FR 25131, (May 9, 2003) (adopting release for mutual fund Customer Identification Program rule). Many mutual funds contractually delegate their BSA compliance functions, including recordkeeping, to transfer agents, although the mutual fund remains responsible under the BSA for ensuring compliance. 30See 31 CFR 103.131 (mutual funds must obtain and record identifying information for persons opening new accounts, and verify the identity of persons opening new accounts); 31 CFR 103.15(c) (mutual funds must maintain records of documentation that supports the filing of a SAR). obligation covers incoming, outgoing, and exchange transactions in currency. The definition of ‘‘currency’’ for purposes of the CTR rule is different from and less inclusive than the definition of ‘‘currency’’ in the rule for Form 8300; therefore, mutual funds would only be required to file CTRs on cash transactions. The threshold in 31 CFR 103.22 applies to transactions conducted during a single business day.15 Under the CTR rule, a financial institution must treat multiple transactions as a single transaction if the financial institution has knowledge that the transactions are conducted by or on behalf of the same person.16 Because mutual funds would no longer be required to file Form 8300s, mutual funds would be freed from having to report applicable transactions involving certain negotiable instruments.17 Although FinCEN recognizes that there may be some threat of financial criminals using negotiable instruments such as money orders to move illicit funds into mutual funds, the volume of Form 8300s filed is relatively low when compared to the overall volume of transactions.18 Because mutual funds rarely receive from or disburse to shareholders significant amounts of currency, FinCEN believes they are not as likely as depository institutions to be used during the initial ‘‘placement’’ stage of the money laundering process.19 FinCEN requests comment on whether mutual funds are less likely to be used during the initial placement stage of money laundering than a depository institution and therefore present a lower risk for money laundering. Furthermore, since mutual funds are subject to SAR reporting requirements, the ability to report suspicious transactions on Form 8300 is redundant.20 FinCEN requests comment on whether the filing of CTRs as opposed to Form 8300s is more appropriate when considering the anti￾money laundering program requirement and the information technology changes that mutual funds may be required to make. B. Section 103.33—The Travel Rule and Related Recordkeeping Requirements In addition, the proposed amendment would subject mutual funds to requirements regarding the creation and retention of records for transmittals of funds, and the requirement to transmit information on these transactions to other financial institutions in the payment chain.21 These requirements are often referred to as the ‘‘Travel Rule.’’ The Travel Rule applies to transmittals of funds in amounts that equal or exceed $3,000. A ‘‘transmittal of funds’’ includes funds transfers processed by banks, as well as similar payments where one or more of the financial institutions processing the payment—the transmittor’s financial institution, an intermediary financial institution, or the recipient’s financial institution—is not a bank.22 Such payments processed by mutual funds would be ‘‘transmittals of funds.’’ If the mutual fund is processing a payment sent by or to its customer, then the mutual fund would be either the ‘‘transmittor’s financial institution’’ or the ‘‘recipient’s financial institution.’’ The Travel Rule requires the transmittor’s financial institution to obtain and retain name, address, and other information on the transmittor and the transaction.23 The Travel Rule also requires the recipient’s financial institution—and in certain instances, the transmittor’s financial institution— to obtain or retain identifying information on the recipient.24 The Travel Rule requires that certain information obtained or retained by the transmittor’s financial institution ‘‘travel’’ with the transmittal order through the payment chain.25 The proposed amendment would include mutual funds within an existing exception designed to exclude from coverage of these requirements funds transfers or transmittal of funds in which certain categories of financial institution are the transmitter, originator, recipient, or beneficiary.26 The proposed inclusion of mutual funds within the exceptions is intended to provide mutual funds with treatment similar to that of banks, brokers or dealers in securities, futures commission merchants, and introducing brokers in commodities. Finally, the proposed amendment would subject mutual funds to requirements on the creation and retention of records for extensions of credit and cross-border transfers of currency, monetary instruments, checks, investment securities, and credit.27 These requirements apply to transactions in amounts exceeding $10,000. Mutual funds are already subject to the record retention requirements of the rules promulgated under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and mutual fund transfer agents are subject to recordkeeping requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.28 FinCEN believes that the requirements of 31 CFR 103.33 and 31 CFR 103.38 would have a de minimus impact on mutual funds and their transfer agents.29 Furthermore, rules under the BSA on the establishment of customer identification programs by mutual funds and on the reporting by mutual funds of suspicious transactions impose requirements to create and retain records.30 VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:06 Jun 04, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM 05JNP1 erowe on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS-1

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Proposed Rules 26999 31Transfer and Reorganization of Bank Secrecy Act Regulations, 73 FR 66414 (November 7, 2008). 32See Investment Company Institute (ICI) 2008 Investment Company Fact Book, at 110 (2008), available at: http://www.icifactbook.org/pdf/ 2008_factbook.pdf (number of mutual funds in the U.S. in 2007). 33The single hour is based on an estimate of 45 minutes to complete the CTR form and 15 minutes for recordkeeping and archiving. 34While it is not industry practice for mutual funds to accept cash, there is no restriction on mutual funds that prohibits mutual funds from accepting cash. Therefore, for purposes of estimating the annual burden the filing of CTRs will have on mutual funds, FinCEN estimates that each mutual fund will file one CTR per year. IV. Request for Comment All comments submitted in response to this notice will become a matter of public record. FinCEN welcomes written comment on all aspects of this notice, and FinCEN especially encourages comments on the following issues: • The anticipated time and monetary savings that could result from replacing the requirement to file reports on Form 8300 with a requirement to file CTRs. • The nature, volume, content, and value of any potentially lost information to law enforcement, tax, regulatory, and counter-terrorism investigations or activities that could result from the filing of CTRs, rather than Form 8300s, by mutual funds. • The anticipated impact of subjecting mutual funds to rules under the BSA that require the creation, retention, and transmittal of records or information for transmittals of funds and other specified transactions. V. Proposed Location in Chapter X As per its November 7, 2008 notice of proposed rulemaking pertaining to a restructuring of its regulations in a new chapter in the Code of Federal Regulations,31 FinCEN is separately proposing to remove Part 103 of Chapter I of Title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, and add Parts 1000 to 1099 (Chapter X). As such and if finalized, the proposed changes herein would be reorganized according to the changes proposed in that rulemaking. The planned reorganization would have no substantive effect on the proposed regulatory changes herein. The proposed regulatory changes herein would be renumbered according to the structure established via the finalization of the Chapter X rule. VI. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (‘‘RFA’’) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), FinCEN certifies that the proposed rule in this notice would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The economic impact of the proposed rule on small entities should not be significant. Mutual funds, regardless of their size, are already required to comply with most of the existing BSA rules required of financial institutions. While all mutual funds are captured under this rulemaking, the estimated burden associated with defining mutual funds as financial institutions is minimal. FinCEN believes that mutual funds rarely receive from or disburse to shareholders significant amounts of currency. New recordkeeping obligations, if not already being performed by mutual funds in accordance with other law or as a matter of prudent business practice, are likely to be commensurate with the size of the fund. FinCEN seeks comment on whether the proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. VII. Executive Order 12866 It has been determined that the proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ for purposes of Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, a regulatory impact analysis is not required. VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information contained in the proposed rule is being submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)). Comments on the collection of information should be sent to the Desk Officer for the Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (1506), Washington, DC 20503 (or by e-mail to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov), with a copy to FinCEN by mail or by Internet submission at the addresses previously specified. In accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, the following information concerning the collection of information as required by 31 CFR 103.22 and 31 CFR 103.33 is presented to assist those persons wishing to comment on the information collection. The collection of information in the proposed rule is in 31 CFR 103.22 and 31 CFR 103.33. Description of Affected Financial Institutions: Mutual funds as defined in 31 CFR 103.11(ccc). Estimated Number of Affected Financial Institutions: 8,029.32 Estimated Average Annual Burden Hours per Affected Financial Institution: The estimated average burden associated with the collection of information in this notice is one hour recordkeeping per response per affected financial institution.33 Estimated Total Annual Burden: 8,029 hours.34 FinCEN specifically invites comment on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the mission of FinCEN, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of FinCEN’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information required to be maintained; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the required collection of information, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to maintain the information. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 103 Administrative practice and procedure, Banks and banking, Brokers, Currency, Investigations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities, Terrorism. Amendment For the reasons set forth above in the preamble, 31 CFR part 103 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 103—FINANCIAL RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING OF CURRENCY AND FOREIGN TRANSACTIONS

1. The authority citation for part 103 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1829b and 1951–1959; 31 U.S.C. 5311–5314 and 5316–5332; title III, secs. 311, 312, 313, 314, 319, 326, 352, Public Law 107–56, 115 Stat. 307. Subpart A—Definitions
2. Amend § 103.11 by revising paragraph (n)(9) and by adding paragraphs (n)(10) and (ccc) to read as follows: VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:06 Jun 04, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM 05JNP1 erowe on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS-1

27000 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Proposed Rules § 103.11 Meaning of terms.

---

(n) * * * (9) An introducing broker in commodities; (10) A mutual fund.

---

(ccc) Mutual fund means an ‘‘investment company’’ (as the term is defined in section 3 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–3)) that is an ‘‘open-end company’’ (as that term is defined in section 5 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–5)) registered or required to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission under section 8 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a–8). Subpart C—Records Required To Be Maintained 3. Amend § 103.33 by revising paragraphs (e)(6)(i)(I) and (f)(6)(i)(I) and by adding paragraphs (e)(6)(i)(J) and (f)(6)(i)(J) to read as follows: § 103.33 Records to be made and retained by financial institutions.

---

(e) * * * (6) * * * (i) * * * (I) A Federal, State or local government agency or instrumentality; or (J) A mutual fund; and

---

(f) * * * (6) * * * (i) * * * (I) A Federal, State or local government agency or instrumentality; or (J) A mutual fund; and

---

Dated: June 1, 2009. William F. Baity, Acting Director, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. [FR Doc. E9–13136 Filed 6–4–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4810–02–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 110 [Docket No. USCG–2008–0852] RIN 1625–AA01 Disestablishing Special Anchorage Area 2; Ashley River, Charleston, SC AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to disestablish the Ashley River Anchorage 2 in Charleston, South Carolina. The removal of the anchorage would accommodate an expansion to the Ripley Light Yacht Club. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before August 4, 2009. Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on or before July 6, 2009. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2008–0852 using any one of the following methods: (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. (2) Fax: 202–493–2251. (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 0001. (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or e-mail Lieutenant Julie Miller, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, at (843) 720– 3273 or Julie.E.Miller@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Participation and Request for Comments We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. Submitting Comments If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG–2008–0852), indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online (via http:// www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online via http:// www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment, it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an e-mail address, or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov, select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG– 2008–0852’’ in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period and may change the rule based on your comments. Viewing Comments and Documents To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the screen, insert USCG– 2008–0852 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility. Privacy Act Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:06 Jun 04, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\05JNP1.SGM 05JNP1 erowe on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS-1