2017-03-22 | NBB_2017_10Added
This circular explains the organization of privileges for policyholders, insured persons, and beneficiaries of insurance contracts, the obligation for insurance undertakings to maintain permanent inventories by distinct management categories, and the resulting reporting obligations for control purposes. It applies to Belgian insurance undertakings requiring authorization under the Law of March 13, 2016, and branches of non-EEA insurance undertakings if their home country law does not provide equivalent creditor protection. The circular clarifies legal provisions applicable since March 23, 2016, and specifies the rules for transmitting information to the National Bank of Belgium. It also states that Regulation No. 12 of the Insurance Supervisory Office of January 22, 2001, is no longer applicable.
NBB published 1 document in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017 Circular – Page 1/16 Boulevard de Berlaimont 14 – BE-1000 Brussels tel. +32 2 221 38 12 – fax + 32 2 221 31 04 company number: 0203.201.340 RPR Brussels www.bnb.be Circular Brussels, March 22, 2017 Reference: NBB_2017_10 your contact person:
Bertrand Leton tel. +32 2 221 23 65 – fax +32 2 221 31 04 bertrand.leton@nbb.be Circular on the privileges of insurance creditors, permanent inventories, and the summary statement of permanent inventories Scope This circular concerns:
a) Belgian law insurance undertakings that are required to apply for authorization as referred to in Article 18, paragraph 1, 1° of the Law of March 13, 2016 on the status and supervision of insurance or reinsurance undertakings, including:
Circular – Page 2/16 NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017 Summary/Objectives The purpose of this circular is to explain the organization of privileges for policyholders, insured persons, and beneficiaries of insurance contracts or commitments, the obligation to maintain permanent inventories by distinct management categories, and the resulting reporting obligations for control purposes. Legal References Law of March 13, 2016 on the status and supervision of insurance or reinsurance undertakings, Articles 194, 195, 230, 643 and 644. Structure
I. Objectives
II. Definitions
III. Entry into force
IV. Specifications relating to the determination of the privilege, permanent inventories and the summary statements of permanent inventories
NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017 Circular – Page 3/16 Madam, Sir,
I. Objectives
The Law of March 13, 2016 on the status and supervision of insurance or reinsurance undertakings has established a system of protection for policyholders, insured persons, and beneficiaries of insurance contracts or commitments in the event of liquidation of the insurance undertaking. This circular reiterates the provisions in this area, specifies the obligations applicable to undertakings, and determines the rules for transmitting information to the Bank. These provisions are detailed in Chapter IV of this circular, which comprises six sections.
Section I comments on the provisions of the Law relating to privileges for policyholders, insured persons, and beneficiaries of insurance contracts or commitments. It distinguishes, on the one hand, privileges on special patrimonies corresponding to each of the distinct management categories organized by the Law and, on the other hand, the privilege on all assets of the insurance undertaking.
Section II comments on the concept of privileged claims comprising the distinct management categories and how to determine and value them.
Section III specifies the concept of special patrimony. It reiterates the obligations of insurance undertakings regarding the constitution of these patrimonies, and details the rules relating to their composition both from the perspective of admissible assets and their valuation.
Section IV comments on the requirements relating to the maintenance of permanent inventories, the status of permanent inventories, and the summary statement of these inventories.
Section V relates to the communication of these inventories and statuses, as well as the summary statement, to the Bank.
Finally, Section VI specifies that Regulation No. 12 of the Insurance Supervisory Office of January 22, 2001, is no longer applicable.
II. Definitions
A. Legal and regulatory texts
Circular – Page 4/16 NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017 B. Concepts used in this circular For the purposes of this circular, the following terms shall mean:
NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017 Circular – Page 5/16
7. Summary statement (of the status of permanent inventories)
The summary statement (of the status of permanent inventories) is a summary of the status of permanent inventories at a given date.
8. Technical debts
Technical debts are the debts of the insurance undertaking, other than technical provisions, arising from insurance operations, in favor of policyholders. These debts are defined in point G.I.1, a), 1° to 3° of Section I of Chapter I of the Annex to the accounting decree and are recorded under items 421.111 to 421.114 of the detailed balance sheet defined in Section I of Chapter I of the same annex. These are:
Circular – Page 6/16 NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017
IV. Specifications relating to the determination of privileges, permanent inventories and the summary statement
SECTION I - Privileges
The provisions relating to privileges for insurance creditors (policyholders, insured persons and beneficiaries of insurance contracts and commitments, excluding reinsurance contracts and commitments) are set out in Articles 643 and 644 of the Law. They organize, on the one hand, privileges on special patrimonies and, on the other hand, a privilege on all assets of the insurance undertaking. A. Privilege on special patrimonies
Article 643 of the Law1 organizes a privilege on each of the special patrimonies corresponding to each of the distinct management categories referred to in Article 230 of the Law.
As specified in the explanatory memorandum to the Law2, “the role of distinct management categories has been limited to the sole implementation of this privilege otherwise provided for in Articles 643 and 644. […] the term “distinct management categories” is therefore, within the framework of the draft law, exclusively reserved for the determination of the basis of the privilege. The usefulness of the concept is therefore only conceived in a situation of concurrence, namely in a “gone concern” perspective consisting of the opening of liquidation proceedings.” The explanatory memorandum also adds “In this role limited to the implementation of the privilege, it was no longer necessary to provide for as many distinct management categories as in the current regulation.” Therefore, Article 230 of the Law now provides for only three types of distinct management categories:
a) a distinct management category for all non-life (direct) insurance activities3; b) a distinct management category for all life (direct) insurance activities except those referred to in c) below; c) a distinct management category for insurance (direct) activities corresponding to each of the activities linked to an investment fund falling under branches 23, 26 and 27 as defined in Annex II of the Law and for which the investment risk is borne by the policyholder. For these investment funds, Article 230 therefore requires a distinct management category per fund. Notwithstanding the fact that Article 230 refers to Article 224 concerning the first two types of distinct management categories and that the latter article provides that undertakings having both life and non-life insurance and reinsurance activities “shall manage separately, on the one hand, non-life insurance and reinsurance activities and, on the other hand, life insurance and reinsurance activities,” the limited purpose of distinct management categories as recalled above has the consequence that these management categories relate exclusively to (direct) insurance activities even if the undertaking is authorized to carry out both insurance and reinsurance activities. Each special patrimony constitutes the basis for the privilege relating to the corresponding distinct management category. In the event of liquidation of the insurance undertaking, privileged claims will be reimbursed from the special patrimonies in preference to all other creditors of the insurance undertaking, with the exception of the remuneration of the liquidator and their staff, as well as ______________________________________ 1 Article 643 of the Law transposes Article 275, paragraph 1, a) of the Directive. 2 Parl. Doc., Chamber 54-1584/001, p.188. 3 The Law does not use the expressions “direct insurance” and “accepted reinsurance.” Therefore, without exception, the expression “insurance” must be understood as direct insurance with the exception of accepted reinsurance.
NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017 Circular – Page 7/16 other liquidation costs insofar as they have benefited the liquidation of the special patrimony concerned (Art. 644, para. 2 of the Law).
If the liquidation of a special patrimony leaves a positive balance, this is shared among the other special patrimonies on a pro rata basis to the deficits of these special patrimonies (Art. 644, para. 3 of the Law).
Within the same distinct management category, insurance creditors have the same rank. If the special patrimony, possibly increased by the surpluses of other special patrimonies, does not allow for the full satisfaction of insurance creditors, a distribution on a pro rata basis must be made and, for the remainder, the privilege on all assets described in point B below must be implemented. B. Privilege on all assets The privilege on all assets of the insurance undertaking is defined in Article 644, paragraph 5 of the Law. It only applies if the liquidation of one or more special patrimonies does not allow for the satisfaction of the insurance creditors concerned. This privilege will therefore only be implemented to the extent that the liquidation of one or more of the special patrimonies referred to in point A above has not allowed for the full satisfaction of the insurance creditors of the corresponding distinct management category. The basis of this privilege consists of all assets of the undertaking that are not subject to the special patrimonies referred to in point A above. In cases where the insurance undertaking is also authorized to carry out reinsurance activities, this basis therefore includes assets related to reinsurance activity. This privilege is general and is only outranked by special privileges (see notably Articles 20 et seq. of the Mortgage Law) and general privileges of salaried workers, the Treasury, and social security bodies and insurers, as well as by the exercise of real rights (mortgages...)4. The insurance creditors concerned by the privilege described in this point have the same rank. In the event of insufficient assets to fully satisfy them, a distribution on a pro rata basis must therefore be made among them.
SECTION II – Privileged claims
The exercise of the privileges described in Section I requires the determination of privileged claims for insurance creditors (policyholders, insured persons and insurance beneficiaries).
A. Type of privileged claims
Given the very broad definition of privileged claim, it should be considered that this concept generally refers to any amount that a person can assert against an insurance undertaking on the basis of an insurance contract or insurance commitment, whether as a policyholder, insured person, beneficiary or injured party having a direct right of action. ______________________________________ 4 In the old regime organized by Article 48/16, § 1 of the Law of July 9, 1975 on the supervision of insurance undertakings, this privilege was general but outranked by all other privileges, both general and special.
Circular – Page 8/16 NBB_2017_10 – March 22, 2017 Among others, the amounts listed below are to be considered privileged claims:
a) for non-life activities:
Circular – Page 10/16 NBB_2017_10 – 22 March 2017
It should also be recalled that, in application of Article 629 of the Act, the composition of special estates can no longer be modified from the moment a decision to open liquidation proceedings has been taken, except in the following cases:
B. Eligible assets and valuation
According to Article 194 of the Act, the assets composing special estates are “evaluated in accordance with Article 123”, i.e., according to the so-called Solvency II rules, at market value. There is no exception to this rule.
Article 194 further provides that “insurance companies hold, at all times, assets free of any charge”.
Although the Act does not explicitly specify this, the verb “hold” must be understood in the sense that the assets belong in full ownership to the insurance company, as provided by Article 16, § 2 of the Act of 9 July 1975 on the control of insurance companies. The regime established by the Act is indeed in continuation of that existing under the aforementioned Act of 9 July 1975.
The expression “free of any charge” is a rule that does not aim at determining the value of the asset itself – which falls under Article 123 – but at the portion of this value that can be recovered in a special estate (allocation value). When it is certain or probable that, upon realization, the value of an asset will be reduced by certain costs or charges, Article 194 requires subtracting the amount of these costs and charges from the allocation value. It goes without saying that the same asset cannot be included more than once in the special estates.
The following points clarify the aforementioned notions in certain specific cases.
If an asset is encumbered by a real right such as a mortgage or pledge, the amount for which the asset is encumbered by the real right cannot be taken into consideration (Articles 194 and 195, second paragraph of the Act).
Companies that practice both life and non-life activities are obliged, under Article 224 of the Act, to manage each of these activities separately. Consequently, an asset falling under the management of non-life activities cannot be included in the special estate of life management and vice-versa.
Assets are evaluated net of debts incurred for their acquisition.
Claims against a third party are evaluated net of debts owed to that third party (Article 628, § 3 of the Act). This rule concerns only the value for which an asset can be included in a special estate. It does not by itself create any set-off between the claim of the insurance company and that of the third party against the insurance company.
The amount of the reinsurer’s share in technical provisions can only be taken into consideration net of the deposit made by this reinsurer with the insurance company, in order to avoid double counting between the allocation of the share covered by the deposit and the assets acquired thanks to this deposit.
13 According to Article 15, 73° of the Act, these authorities are the commercial court regarding bankruptcy and forced dissolution, or the Bank regarding other liquidation procedures.
NBB_2017_10 – 22 March 2017 Circular – Page 11/16
The value of an asset that the insurance company intends to sell in the short term is reduced by estimated realization costs.
Assets are evaluated taking into account the derivatives related to them, provided that these derivatives are not themselves included in the special estate. In other words, if an asset is evaluated taking into account the underlying derivatives, these derivatives cannot be part of the special estate. Conversely, if derivatives are included in a special estate, the assets of which these derivatives constitute the underlying must be evaluated without taking these derivatives into account.
Contracts falling under branches 23, 26, and 27 which are linked to investment funds and for which the investment risk is borne by the policyholder are subject, per investment fund, to separate management. For the assets constituting the special estates related to these contracts, their respective amount is determined by the assets composing the concerned investment fund, which also corresponds to the total amount of insurance claims related to the concerned fund. Therefore, the special estate of each of these separate managements can only include the assets of the concerned investment fund.
Assets which the Act (Article 197) admits may be located in a third country (State not a member of the European Union) can be taken into consideration for the constitution of a special estate. This means that when they consist of real estate, assets located in a third country are admitted.
On the other hand, securities are only admitted if two conditions are previously met, namely:
Proof of these conditions is communicated to the Bank as an annex to the summary statement.
Circular – Page 12/16 NBB_2017_10 – 22 March 2017
In the case where the company borrows securities, the borrowed securities can constitute the special estate for an amount that cannot be higher than the total value of the securities provided as collateral, the latter no longer, in accordance with Article 195, second paragraph of the Act, constituting the special estate.
As with investments in general, the insurance company will ensure compliance with the prudent person principle as set out in Articles 190 to 193 of the Act. In particular, it will ensure:
SECTION IV - Permanent inventories, situations of permanent inventories, and summary statement
A. Maintenance of permanent inventories
Article 195 of the Act provides that “Insurance companies maintain (…) a special register called 'permanent inventory', of the assets referred to in Article 194 according to the separate managements referred to in Article 230”. In other words, the insurance company maintains a register per separate management14.
The maintenance of permanent inventories pursues two objectives. On the one hand, it allows, at any time, to determine the composition of each special estate and, thus, to determine which assets, in the event of liquidation, will be reserved by priority for insurance creditors. On the other hand, it allows, in particular, the supervisory authority to verify if each special estate sufficiently covers the insurance claims relevant to the concerned separate management.
Permanent inventories are kept at the head office of the insurance company (Art. 195 of the Act). For Belgian branches of companies from third countries, it is the Belgian head office of this branch (Art. 588, § 1, 2° of the Act). In all cases, permanent inventories can be kept in a location previously approved by the Bank (Art. 76 of the Act).
14 See also Article 276, paragraph 2, first paragraph of the Directive regarding the obligation to maintain separate registers for life and non-life insurance activities.
NBB_2017_10 – 22 March 2017 Circular – Page 13/16
The maintenance of permanent inventories falls under the responsibility of the management committee and falls within the competence of the compliance function and the internal audit function. In particular, it is expected of the compliance function that it ensures the proper application of legal rules as explained by this circular, and of the internal audit function, that it ensures the validity of the asset and liability evaluation process, as well as the production of permanent inventories and the summary statement.
The reports that the statutory auditor draws up based on Article 333 of the Act also concern the permanent inventories.
Furthermore, the Bank may request special reports from the statutory auditor based on Article 334 of the Act.
Insurance companies respect the following principles regarding the maintenance of permanent inventories.
a) Link with the insurance company’s accounting plan
The identification of the assets composing a special estate is done by reference to the accounting plan that the insurance company establishes in application of Article 5 of the accounting decree.
Each asset account of the accounting plan contains:
All assets recorded in a specific account of the accounting plan and corresponding to a special estate fall, at all times, from their recording until their deletion, under this special estate.
The structure of the accounting plan must be sufficiently detailed so that assets of different nature fall under different accounts.
Similarly, it is good practice that each deposit account corresponds to a single account of the accounting plan.
b) Required mentions
Each permanent inventory includes the following mentions:
15 This does not prevent an asset from being constituted of several undivided shares and each being allocated to a special estate provided that, on the one hand, each share is allocated to only one special estate and, on the other hand, that the sum of the shares does not exceed the total value of the asset.
Circular – Page 14/16 NBB_2017_10 – 22 March 2017
B. Situation of permanent inventories
The situation of a permanent inventory includes, at a determined date, by reference to the accounts of the accounting plan, each of the assets composing the concerned special estate and, therefore, the separate management, to which these assets relate.
The assets included in the situation are evaluated in accordance with Section III, C. If an event, such as the intention to sell in the short term or a recent or probable decrease in value, is likely to significantly modify the evaluation of an asset, the insurance company must mention it by indicating the (probable) difference in value compared to that mentioned in the situation.
The situation mentions the total value of the concerned special estate, as well as the total amount of privileged claims of the corresponding separate management.
C. Summary statement of the situation of permanent inventories
The summary statement summarizes the content of the permanent inventories by distinguishing the total amount of each special estate and privileged claims from:
a) the non-life separate management, b) the life separate management excluding contracts and commitments linked to an investment fund, c) all separate managements related to contracts and commitments linked to investment funds.
Insurance companies fill out the summary statement according to the model appearing in the annex to this circular.
SECTION V – Communication of permanent inventories and the summary statement to the Bank
A. Principles
Article 195, third paragraph of the Act provides that companies “communicate the situation of the permanent inventory of each separate management to the Bank respecting the form and content prescribed by it and on the support and within the timeframe it sets”.
NBB_2017_10 – 22 March 2017 Circular – Page 15/16
Given that permanent inventories are only useful in the event of liquidation of the insurance company, the obligations regarding the production and communication of the various documents covered by this circular are modulated, in particular according to the solvency situation of the company.
B. Communication of the summary statement to the Bank
The summary statement is transmitted to the Bank regularly, at the same time and according to the same modalities (OneGate) as the annual quantitative reporting. It is communicated according to the model of the annex to this circular.
C. Communication of permanent inventories and situations of permanent inventories to the Bank
Since permanent inventories are only useful in the event of liquidation of the insurance company, it is not appropriate to provide for their systematic and complete communication to the Bank when the financial situation of the company can be considered satisfactory.
The insurance company must nevertheless be able to produce its permanent inventories and a situation of each of them at the first request of the Bank, in particular within the framework of a control conducted without travel or an inspection at the company’s head office.
The systematic communication of one or more permanent inventories and/or the corresponding situations may be required by the Bank when the financial situation of the company justifies it. This will be the case, among others, of insurance companies subject to one or more of the following measures:
a) the binding measures referred to in Article 508 of the Act, b) the implementation, by the company, of its recovery plan, as provided by Article 509 of the Act, c) the imposition by the Bank of a recovery program, as provided by Article 510 of the Act, d) the imposition by the Bank of a short-term financing plan as provided in Article 511 of the Act, e) the limitation or prohibition of the free disposal of the insurance company’s assets decided by the Bank based on Article 513 of the Act, f) the exceptional recovery measures referred to in Article 517 of the Act, g) the financial system safeguard measures referred to in Articles 519 to 537 of the Act, h) a waiver of authorization in accordance with Article 538 of the Act, i) an ex officio deregistration in accordance with Article 540 of the Act, j) a revocation of authorization in accordance with Articles 541 and 542 of the Act, k) the withdrawal of the benefit of the transitional measure referred to in Article 667, first paragraph of the Act in application of the third paragraph of the same article, l) the refusal or withdrawal of the benefit of one of the transitional measures referred to in Articles 668 and 669 of the Act in application of Article 671, § 1, first paragraph of the Act.
The permanent inventories and the corresponding situations are attested by a person who can validly commit the insurance company.
Circular – Page 16/16 NBB_2017_10 – 22 March 2017
SECTION VI – Regulation No. 12
Pursuant to Article 647 of the Act, Regulation No. 12 of the Insurance Control Office of 22 January 2001 fixing the rules concerning the permanent inventory of representative values, modified by Regulation No. 13 of 4 November 2002, is no longer applicable.
A copy of this circular is transmitted to the statutory auditor(s) of your company.
Sincere regards,
Jan Smets
Governor
Read the rest free
Source: National Bank of Belgium — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from NBB
NBB published 1 document in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.