2018-02-27
Added · Updated
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority issues these completion instructions to guide authorized institutions incorporated in Hong Kong on submitting the Certificate of Compliance with the Banking Ordinance. The document mandates quarterly reporting of capital base, liquidity ratios, maximum exposures, and assets under charge, specifying distinct calculation methods for solo and consolidated bases. It further details the reporting requirements for exempted transactions and provides illustrative examples for calculating exposures covered by letters of comfort.
Completion Instructions Certificate of Compliance with the Banking Ordinance of an authorized institution incorporated in Hong Kong Form MA(BS)1F(a) Introduction Section A : General Instructions
Securities transactions should be reported on the “trade date” basis. For the purposes of determining a credit exposure , securities transactions under sale and repurchase agreements (“repos”) and reverse repos should be reported on an “economic substance” approach (i.e. they are treated as collateralised deposits and loans respectively). For repos, the reporting institution is exposed to the issuer of the securities. For reverse repos, the reporting institution is, in the first instance, cxposcd to the counterparty, only in the event of a failure of the counterparty would the reporting institution be exposed to the issuer of the securities acquired. The reporting treatment of unmatured spot and forward purchase of securities and of unmatured spot and forward sales of securities should be as for repos and reverse repos respectively. Where cash is not involved in these transactions (e.g. securities repos), the reporting institution is only exposed to the issuer of the securities delivered to the counterparty. Where the terms of a repo transaction transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of the ownership of the securities to the buyer, the transaction should be regarded as an outright sale and the commitment to repurchase should be treated as an off-balance sheet exposure to the issuer of the securities. Where the commitment to repurchase has no pre-determined price, the fair value (e.g. current market value) as of the reporting date should be used. On the other hand, if the reporting institution is a buyer of such a repo, it should regard the transaction as an outright purchase and treat it as an on-balance sheet exposure to the issuer of the securities. Section B : Specific Instructions 8. 9.1 9.2 9.3 Part I - Capital Base Unless otherwise advised by the Monetary Authority, report the capital base figure stood at the end of the previous quarter which is relevant to the determination of compliance with Part XV of the Banking Ordinance. Part II - Compliance with the Banking Ordinance Put an “X” in the appropriate column to indicate whether or not the institution has contravened each of the sections specified in this Part during the reporting period. Items 2.3.5.7 & 8 For the purposes of determining compliance with sections 81, 83(except 83(2)(b)), 87, 88 and 90 of the Banking Ordinance, institutions should calculate on a daily basis the relevant ratios by dividing the exposures or amounts of restricted assets under each of these sections by the capital base prevailing at the close of business on the same day. However, for the sake of convenience, institutions may use the capital base reported in Part I of this Certificate as the basis of calculation provided that there has been no significant reduction in the capital base during the quarter covered by the Certificate. Item 6 For the purpose of determining compliance with section 87A of the Banking Ordinance, institutions which, during the reporting period, have acquired the share capital of a company (except those approved by the Monetary Authority under section MA(BS)1F(a)/P.2(3/20172018)
9.4 9.5 87A(2)(a) or exempted under section 87A(8)) should calculate the ratio by dividing the value of the share capital (i.e. cost of acquisition or the accumulated value in the case of a series of acquisitions) by the capital base prevailing at the close of business on the date of acquisition. However, for the sake of convenience, institutions may use the capital base reported in Part I of this Certificate as the basis of calculation provided that there has been no significant reduction in the capital base during the period from the end of the previous quarter to the date of acquisition. Jtem 9 For the purpose of determining its compliance with the minimum capital adequacy ratio applicable to it (defined in section 3 of the Banking (Capital) Rules to be the institution’s CET1 capital ratio, Tier 1 capital ratio and Total capital ratio), the reporting institution should take into account any variation of its capital adequacy ratio made by the Monetary Authority by notice served on the institution under section 97F(1) of the Banking Ordinance. That is, the reporting institution should certify compliance against the capital adequacy ratio specified in section 97F(1) notice. Moreover, for reasons already mentioned in paragraph 5 above, institutions which have been required by the Monetary Authority to observe the capital adequacy ratio on a consolidated basis should note that the consolidated capital base to be used for computation under this section may not be the same as the one used under Part XV of the Ordinance. Item 10 Report in this item whether the reporting institution complied with the minimum liquidity requirement(s) applicable to it during the reporting period. ® If the reporting institution is a category 1 institution, the minimum liquidity requirements areis the minimum required level of Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) set out respectively in rule 4 and rule 8A of the Banking (Liquidity) Rules (BLR). ® If the reporting institution is a category 2 institution, the minimum liquidity requirement is the minimum required level of the Liquidity Maintenance Ratio (LMR) set out in rule 7 of the BLR. Further to this, a category 2A institution must also comply with the minimum Core Funding Ratio (CFR) set out in rule 8D of the BLR. In the “solo” Certificate, the reporting institution should complete — ® sub-item (a) — covering the institution’s Hong Kong office position as referred to under rule 10(1)(a) of the BLR); and ® sub-item (b) — covering the institution’s unconsolidated position as referred to under rule 10(1)(b) of the BLR, if this position is applicable to the institution. If the reporting institution is also required to submit the Certificate on a consolidated basis, it should, in the “consolidated” Certificate, complete item 10(c), covering the institution’s consolidated position as referred to under rule 11(1) of the BLR. MA(BS)1F(a)/P.3(3/26172018)
9.6 9.7 10. 10.1 10.2 Item 11 For the purpose of determining compliance with section 119A of the Banking Ordinance, only the reporting institution’s solo position (i.e. the combined position of Hong Kong office and, if any, overseas branches) should be taken into account. This is applicable to reporting under both the solo and the consolidated Certificates. Item 12 For the purposes of indicating compliance with the rules made under section 60A(1) of the Banking Ordinance (that is, the Banking (Disclosure) Rules, or hereafter referred to BDR), the reporting institution is required to complete item 12 under a solo Certificate only. The certification of compliance should be made in relation to the reporting institution’s most recent disclosure statement issued prior to the Certificate of Compliance. For instance, if the institution’s financial year-end is end-December it should indicate in its solo Certificate for the period ending 30 September whether it has contravened the requirements of the BDR in respect of its disclosures for the interim reporting period. Any contraventions of the BDR in respect of its disclosures for the annual reporting period should be recorded in the Certificate for the period ending 30 June. Where the Certificate of Compliance relates to a quarter in which no disclosure statement has been issued, the reporting institution should give the same answer as on the previous quarter’s Certificate of Compliance. The reporting institution should complete item 12 by putting a “Y” or “N” in the appropriate column to indicate whether or not the institution has contravened any of the requirements of the BDR. If the answer to item 12 is “yes”, the institution should specify in the space provided relevant section(s) of the BDR that it contravened. If the institution is exempted by the Monetary Authority for disclosures required under the BDR, it should tick the relevant box as provided in the Certificate. Part III - Maximum Exposures Items1-6 For each of the sections specified under these items, report the maximum exposure incurred during the reporting period. In this connection, the daily closing exposures should be used for comparison and reporting purposes. The amount reported should include onlv those transactions which are subject to the limitations / restrictions prescribed under the relevant sections. Items and transactions which are exempted under sections 81(4), 81(5), 81(6), 81(7), 83(4A), 87(2), 88(2), 88(3) and 88(5) should not be included. Where an exposure is supported by a letter of comfort, the amount to be reported in item 1 is the difference between the maximum exposure incurred in the reporting period and the limit exempted under s.81(6)(b)(ii) (“the exempt limit”), unless otherwise advised by the Monetary Authority. For the purpose of this return, the exempt limit is defined as the difference between the maximum lending limit as specified in the comfort letter and the statutory limit under section 81 (i.e. that being 25% of an AT's capital base). An example is provided at Annex 1. Jtem 7 MA(BS)1F(a)/P.4(3/20172018)
Report the maximum aggregate exposure within the meaning of section 90(1) incurred during the reporting period. Daily closing exposures should again be used for comparison and reporting purposes. Transactions exempted from sections 83, 87 and 88 should not be included in the computation unless otherwise notified by the Monetary Authority. 11. Part IV — Assets under Charge 11.1 Item 1 Report in sub-item 1(c) the maximum ratio, expressed as a percentage, during the reporting period between the aggregate book value of all assets charged and the book value of the total assets after provisions (excluding contra items) of the institution. The book value of the numerator and denominator of such maximum ratio should then be reported under sub-items 1(a) and 1(b) respectively. For both the solo and consolidated Certificates, report only the institution’s solo position covering the Hong Kong offices and, if any, overseas branches. 11.2 Item 2 Report in the table details of all charges created during the reporting period. These include: ° Column (a) - Date State in chronological order all the dates on which new charges, except those approved or exempted by the Monetary Authority, were created. ° Column (b) - Value of charges Report the book value of the assets which were the subject of a new charge created on the date indicated in column (a). ° Column (c) - Aggregate value of all charges Report the aggregate book value of all the assets which have been charged to another party (including those reported under column (b) but exclude those approved or exempted by the Monetary Authority under sections 119A(2) and 119A(3) at the close of business on the date indicated in column (a). ° Column (d) - Value of total assets Report the book value of the total assets after provisions (excluding contra items) of the institution at the close of business on the date indicated in column (a). 12. Part V - Exemnoted / Approved Transactions 12.1 Item MA(BS)1F(a)/P.5(3/20172018)
12.2 Report the maximum exposures during the reporting period in respect of the transactions that were excluded from sections 80, 81 and 83 as approved by the Monetary Authority under sections 80(2), 81(4), 81(5), 81(6)(b)&(i), 81(7), 83(4)(e)&(g) and 83(4A). Item 2 Relevant section: Specify the section under which exemption / approval has been given by the Monetary Authority. Name of customer:
12.3 Specify the section under which the relevant approval was given by the Monetary Authority. . Name of company/ location of property:
12.4 the maximum amount that had been overdrawn by the institution during the reporting period. Item 4(a) Report the maximum aggregate value of all charges exempted by the Monetary Authority under section 119A(3) of the Banking Ordinance in respect of each of the classes of charges. . Class of exempted charges: Select the appropriate class of exempted charges, i.e.
Hong Kong Monetary Authority | March 20172018 MA(BS)1F(a)/P.9(3/20172018)
Annex 1 Illustration of reporting a maximum exposure covered by a letter of comfort HKS$’000 Maximum lending limit 100,000 25% of the reporting AI’s capital base 30.000 Amount of the exempt limit 70,000 Maximum exposure during the quarter 90,000 Less : exempt limit 70,000 Amount to be reported 20,000 MA(BS)1F(a)/P.10(3/20172018)