2020-04-23
Added · Updated
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority reports that Hong Kong banks hold significant LIBOR and HIBOR exposures, with substantial volumes maturing after 2021 lacking adequate fallback provisions. The document outlines key industry challenges, including the absence of standardized fallback language, low liquidity for alternative reference rates, and significant IT and model adjustments required for transition. It further details global developments in benchmark reform, such as transition roadmaps from the UK and US, the development of fallback protocols by ISDA, and the growing issuance of products referencing alternative reference rates.
Annex 1 Results of Survey on Reform of Interest Rate Benchmarks for Q4 2019
Hong Kong banking sector’s exposures referencing LIBOR (LIBOR exposures) (HK$ trillion, as at end-September 2019) Assets Liabilities Derivatives Total amount of LIBOR exposures (note) $4.5 $1.6 $34.6 as a % of total assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies 30% 11% N/A LIBOR exposures which will mature after end-2021 $1.5 $0.5 $16.1 of which without adequate fall-back outstanding amount $1.4 $0.5 $14.7 as a % of total LIBOR assets, liabilities or derivatives 33% 32% 46% Note: Includes exposures referencing LIBOR in five currencies (i.e. USD, EUR, GBP, JPY and CHF), as well as benchmarks calculated based on LIBOR, including Singapore Dollar Swap Offer Rate (SOR), Thai Baht Interest Rate Fixing (THBFIX), Mumbai Interbank Forward Offer Rate (MIFOR) and Philippine Interbank Reference Rate (PHIREF).
Hong Kong banking sector’s exposures referencing HIBOR (HIBOR exposures) (HK$ trillion, as at end-September 2019) Assets Liabilities Derivatives Total amount of HIBOR exposures $4.7 $0.2 $12.2 as a % of total assets or liabilities denominated in HKD 49% 2% N/A
AIs’ preparation for transition to alternative reference rates (ARRs) Key components in AIs’ preparatory work for transition to ARRs % AIs having the component in place Establishment of a steering committee and/or appointment of a senior executive for overseeing the preparation for transition 63% Development of a bank-wide transition plan 38% Quantification and monitoring of LIBOR exposures 48% Impact assessment across businesses and functions 42% Identification and evaluation of risk associated with the transition 38% Identification of affected IT systems and development of a plan to upgrade these systems 39% Identification of affected internal models and development of a plan to modify these models 36% Development of a plan to introduce ARR products 28% Development of a plan to reduce LIBOR exposures 25% Development of a plan to renegotiate LIBOR-linked contracts 24%
Key challenges identified by the industry in preparing for the transition i. There was no standard and consistent fall-back languages in the industry for adoption by AIs and other market participants in their existing contracts referencing LIBOR. ii. The liquidity for products referencing ARRs was comparatively low. iii. There was no well-established term structure for ARRs. iv. There was limited guidance available to assist smaller institutions in preparing for the transition. v. AIs needed to implement significant changes to their information technology systems, internal models and processes within a short timeframe to cater for the transition to ARRs. vi. Certain types of financial contracts referencing LIBOR were difficult, if not impossible, for AIs to renegotiate with their customers or counterparties. vii. AIs might face conduct risk when dealing with their customers along the transition to ARRs. viii. Awareness of the benchmark reform and the need for transition to ARRs were comparatively low among non-AI customers and counterparties. ix. It was not clear whether and, if so, how the transition to ARRs would affect AIs in respect of taxation, accounting and regulatory framework. x. The status of Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate (HIBOR) vis-à-vis Hong Kong Dollar Overnight Index Average (HONIA) as the local interest rate benchmark over a longer term was uncertain. Note: The HKMA, in consultation with the Treasury Markets Association, will consider providing more assistance to the banking industry in overcoming these challenges.
Annex 2 Latest Developments in Benchmark Reform and Transition to Alternative Reference Rates
1 Interest Rate Benchmarks Review: Full Year 2019 and the Fourth Quarter of 2019, ISDA, January 2020.
while the trading of SOFR swaps also increased from US$6 billion in 2018 to USD393 billion in 2019 in notional value. ii. OTC Clearing Hong Kong Limited issued a circular in March 2020 to propose the transition to the use of SOFR and Euro Short-Term rate (€STR) in discounting USD and EUR interest rate swaps and non-deliverable interest rate swaps. 4. Development of term structures and calculation conventions for ARRs i. The RFRWG issued a paper in January 2020 to discuss the potential uses of SONIA compounded in arrears and Term SONIA Reference Rate (a forwardlooking term rate representing the expected average of SONIA over a given period) for various types of derivatives and cash products. ii. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York started publishing in March 2020 a SOFR compounded index and rolling period averages to provide a simple means for users to compute SOFR-based compound interest over a given period. iii. The Bank of England is consulting on publishing compounded indices and averages for SONIA similar to those for SOFR. 5. Guidance on preparation for transition to ARRs i. The ARRC is developing a set of best practices for the industry to help support the transition away from LIBOR, in addition to the Practical Implementation Checklist for SOFR Adoption issued in September 2019. ii. The Treasury Markets Association developed a dedicated web page containing a collection of useful information on benchmark reform and transition to ARRs (https://www.tma.org.hk/en_market_LIBOR.aspx).
More like this from HKMA
HKMA published 11 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.