2019-05-03
Added · Updated
Ralph Steven Giorgio is required to pay a $2,500 administrative fine to the State of Connecticut for transacting business as an unregistered investment adviser agent. The agreement mandates that Giorgio refrain from violating the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act or engaging in similar unregistered activities in the future. This settlement resolves the investigation without initiating formal administrative proceedings, and Giorgio waives his right to judicial review of the terms.
IN THE MATTER OF: * STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT * RALPH STEVEN GIORGIO * CRD NO. 1048638 * NO. ST-19-8364-S *
WHEREAS, the Banking Commissioner (“Commissioner”) is charged with the administration of Chapter 672a of the General Statutes of Connecticut, the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (“Act”) and Sections 36b-31-2 to 36b-31-33, inclusive, of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies (“Regulations”) promulgated under the Act; WHEREAS, Ralph Steven Giorgio (CRD No. 1048638) (“Giorgio”) is an individual whose address last known to the Commissioner is 4 Cowdray Park Drive, Greenwich, Connecticut 06831. Giorgio was registered as a broker-dealer agent of various firms under Chapter 672a of the General Statutes of Connecticut, the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (“Act”), from approximately January 31, 1994 through July 31, 2012; WHEREAS, the Commissioner, through the Securities and Business Investments Division (“Division”) of the Department of Banking (“Department”) conducted an investigation into the activities of Giorgio pursuant to Section 36b-26 of the Act (“Investigation”); WHEREAS, as a result of the Investigation, the Division obtained evidence that Giorgio transacted business as an investment adviser agent of Sentinel Growth Fund Management, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company located in Stamford, Connecticut, while unregistered in contravention of Section 36b6(c)(2) of the Act; WHEREAS, the Commissioner believes that a violation of Section 36b-6(c)(2) of the Act would support the initiation of administrative proceedings against Giorgio under Section 36b-27 of the Act; WHEREAS, an administrative proceeding initiated under Section 36b-27 of the Act would constitute a “contested case” within the meaning of Section 4-166(4) of the General Statutes of Connecticut; WHEREAS, Section 4-177(c) of the General Statutes of Connecticut and Section 36a-1-55(a) of the Regulations of the Connecticut State Agencies provide that a contested case may be resolved by stipulation or agreed settlement, unless precluded by law; WHEREAS, the Commissioner and Giorgio desire to settle the matters described herein and voluntarily enter into this Stipulation and Agreement, acknowledging that this Stipulation and Agreement