Assessment of Asset-Intensive Reinsurance Contracts DNB

Q&A

Read aloud

Question:

Which reinsurance contracts require prior consent from DNB?

Published: 08 July 2025

Answer:

Section 3:267e of the Wft requires insurance undertakings to obtain DNB’s consent prior to entering into or amending asset-intensive reinsurance contracts, if these reinsurance contracts allow the reinsurance undertaking (referred to in the Wft as ‘the other insurance undertaking’) at any time to hold assets in a state outside the European Economic Area
1
.

This means that asset-intensive reinsurance contracts are contracts where there is not only risk transfer, but also asset transfer, or where the insurance undertaking or reinsurance undertaking does not pay out the reinsured losses immediately, but at a later date. Another characteristic of such a contract may be that the reinsurance undertaking generates profits not only from the reinsurance premiums received for the risk transfer, but also from investment returns on assets held.

The consent requirement does not depend on the country of domicile of the reinsurance undertaking. The requirement also applies if a reinsurance undertaking from another Member State may hold the assets in a third country. This may be the case if the reinsurance undertaking from another Member State transfers the reinsured risk to a reinsurance undertaking outside the European Economic Area through asset-intensive retrocession. The insurance undertaking is not required to seek prior consent for asset-intensive reinsurance contracts if the reinsurance contract provides for exclusion of transfer of assets to third countries. The reinsurance contract then prevents asset-intensive retrocession of the reinsured risks, for instance, which could have resulted in assets being held in a third country.

DNB will assess the application to determine whether the insurance undertaking can comply with the prudent person principle, as referred to in Section 3:267d(1) of the Wft and in Sections 118-122 of the Decree on Prudential Rules for Financial Undertakings (Besluit prudentiële regels Wft – Bpr), for the entire term of the reinsurance contract.

Below, DNB indicates for different types of reinsurance whether it expects these to qualify as asset-intensive in the insurance undertaking’s analysis.

Reinsurance of insurance policies without capital accumulation

In principle, DNB deems reinsurance relating exclusively to insurance liabilities where policyholders do not accumulate capital (risk insurance) to be exempt from the consent requirement, since investment returns on assets held are not typically a significant source of revenue for the reinsurance undertaking. Non-life insurance policies usually classify as risk insurance, as do some life insurance policies.

Proportionate reinsurance of insurance policies with capital accumulation

DNB expects that, in the case of proportional reinsurance of insurance policies where capital has been or is being accumulated, the reinsurance undertaking will hold assets in many instances. This is because asset transfers may take place at the start of the reinsurance contract, with any reinsurance recoverables usually being paid out only after a longer period (several years) after they arise.

Non-proportional reinsurance of insurance policies with capital accumulation

In case of non-proportional reinsurance of insurance policies where capital has been or is being accumulated, the type of reinsurance as well as the reinsurance conditions determine whether the reinsurance undertaking may hold assets.

‘Swap’ contracts (such as for longevity risk) are an example of non-proportional reinsurance that generally involve the reinsurance undertaking holding assets. This is because under such contracts, any reinsurance recoverables are paid out only after a longer period (several years) after they arise. Note that posting collateral by the reinsurance undertaking does not prevent that the insurance undertaking reports a reinsurance recoverable on its balance sheet over a longer period.

Information to be submitted with an application for consent

DNB will consent to the intention to enter into (or amend) an asset-intensive reinsurance, unless the application of the prudent person principle referred to in Section 3:267d(1) of the Wft is not ensured. Pursuant to Section 122a of the Bpr, the following information must be submitted with the application:

The reinsurance contract including annexes, including an explanation of the valuation approach of the ceding insurance undertaking’s claim against the other insurance undertaking ;

If applicable, the collateral agreements;

Information on the geographical location of the ceding insurance undertaking’s claim against the other insurance undertaking and the related collateral;

A substantiation of the adequacy of the risk management with respect to the reinsurance;

An analysis of credit risks associated with the reinsurance;

Information that enables DNB to reasonably assess whether it can exercise its competence as referred to in Section 3:137 of the Wft after reinsurance;

An opinion from the insurance undertaking's risk management function on the information submitted and the insurance undertaking's ability to meet the conditions relating to the asset-intensive reinsurance as referred to in Section 3:267e of the Wft.

In the case of an application for consent for a non-material asset-intensive reinsurance, insurance undertakings can suffice with submitting a summary of the information to substantiate the explanations under a, d, e and g.
2
DNB considers asset-intensive reinsurance to be material if entering into the reinsurance contract may result in the total reinsurance recoverable on the insurance undertaking’s balance sheet being (or at any time becoming) of such significance that its omission or misstatement could impact the decision-making or the judgement of the supervisory authorities.

The assessment of the application for consent under Section 3:267e of the Wft relates solely to the compliance with the prudent person principle during the term of the reinsurance contract

As mentioned above, when applying for consent to enter into or to amend an asset-intensive reinsurance, DNB assesses whether application of the prudent person principle is ensured. The prudent person principle is an existing standard, with which insurance undertakings already had to comply prior to the introduction of the consent requirement.

The assessment does not relate to whether the reinsurance may be included in the calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement under the standard formula. If an insurance undertaking wishes to consult DNB about the risk mitigation technique in this context, the insurance undertaking completes the relevant self-assessment and sends this to DNB together with the underlying documentation. For an explanation, see the Q&A on Risk mitigation techniques for (re)insurance undertakings . Insurance undertakings can contact their supervisor with any questions.

The implications for resolvability can also be discussed with DNB in advance. The assessment of an application for consent under Section 3:267e of the Wft does not pertain to the consequences for the resolvability of the insurance undertaking or its group nor the extent to which the reinsurance could lead to substantive impediments thereto, as referred to in Section 3a:82 of the Wft. 3 For prior consultation on this topic, the insurance undertaking or relevant group entity may turn to its regular contacts at DNB’s Resolution division. For more information on resolvability, see the Policy rule on resolvability of insurers 2023 (in Dutch) .

Downloads

Handleiding Self Assessment Beoordeling Risicolimiteringstechnieken Standaardformule

(30 November 2017 | 427KB DOCX)

Beoordelingskader RLT Tbv Self Assessment

(30 November 2017 | 50KB XLSX)

Handleiding instemmingsaanvragen activa-intensieve herverzekeringen

(16 January 2025 | 96KB PDF)

Base law

Directive 2009/138/EC - Article 132
(Refers to an external site)

Delegated Regulation 2015/35 - Article 305
(Refers to an external site)

Wft - Sections 3:267d and 3:267e
(Refers to an external site)

Bpr – Sections 118-122 and 122a
(Refers to an external site)

EIOPA-BoS-24-075 Supervisory Statement on supervision of reinsurance concluded with third country insurance and reinsurance undertakings (Refers to an external site)

Disclaimer

Q&As provide further insight into our policy practice by setting out our interpretation of statutory supervisory rules. Institutions subject to our supervision may choose to comply with the laws and regulations in other ways, however. If they do so, they must be able to demonstrate and substantiate their compliance. To read more about the status of our policy statements, go to the Explanatory guide to DNB’s policy statements on Open Book on Supervision.

Footnotes

[1] Parliamentary Papers II 2023/24, 36442, no. 3, p. 4 (explanatory memorandum).

[2] This proportional approach aligns with EIOPA’s Supervisory Statement on supervision of reinsurance concluded with third country insurance and reinsurance undertakings (EIOPA-BoS-24-075, 4 April 2024). DNB follows this approach in its ongoing supervision, as well as in the assessment of a request for approval, insofar as the stated expectations relate to the prudent person principle.

[3] These questions are relevant for insurers and groups for which DNB prepares resolution plans and assesses their resolvability within the meaning of Article 3a:82 of the Financial Supervision Act (Wft).

Discover related articles

Q&A

Insurers

Share:

Share on LinkedIn

Share on X

Share on Facebook

Share via Email

Interesting articles

Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years

15 July 2026

News item supervision

Dutch insurers and pension funds are investing more and more in private assets, such as private equity and private credit. By 2025, they had a combined total of €276 billion worth of these investments on their books.

Read more
Dutch insurers and pension funds have been investing more in private assets in recent years

News item supervision

15 July 2026

De Nederlandsche Bank publishes ‘Integrity Supervision in Focus 2026’

25 June 2026

News item supervision

In the third edition of ‘Integrity Supervision in Focus’ (ISF), we share the key insights from our integrity supervision.

Read more
De Nederlandsche Bank publishes ‘Integrity Supervision in Focus 2026’

News item supervision

25 June 2026

DNB email on technical adjustments

25 June 2026

News item supervision

This week, you may receive an email from De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB). This email concerns technical adjustments required to continue corresponding with DNB by email.

Read more
DNB email on technical adjustments

News item supervision

25 June 2026

Update FATF-warning lists June 2026

23 June 2026

News item supervision

FATF released an update of its ‘grey’ and ‘black’ lists.

Read more
Update FATF-warning lists June 2026

News item supervision

23 June 2026

Necessary cookies

To ensure the proper operation of the website, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB) uses functional cookies and analytics cookies, and has taken measures to ensure that these cookies have little or no impact on the privacy of website users.

Optional cookies

Some pages include embedded content from external websites. These websites may use proprietary (tracking) cookies. This allows third parties to track visitor statistics, show personalised content and display targeted ads, for example.

You can make your choice about allowing these optional cookies both when you first visit the website and when you navigate to a page with embedded content.