Rule · BI · 31 Mar 2005
Commercial banks in Indonesia must submit rating agency registration applications in writing to Bank Indonesia and assume responsibility for utilizing acknowledged rating agency services. These provisions replace Attachment 2 of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 5/23/DPNP dated September 29, 2003, and come into force as of March 31, 2005. The document also revokes Attachment 2 of Circular Letter Number 7/3/DPNP dated January 31, 2005.
Unofficial translation
No. 7/ 8 /DPNP Jakarta, March 31, 2005
CIRCULAR LETTER
To
ALL COMMERCIAL BANKS
IN INDONESIA
Concerning: Rating Agencies and Ratings Acknowledged by Bank Indonesia ____________________________________________
Article 12 of Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 5/12/PBI/2003 dated July 17,
2003 concerning The Minimum Capital Requirement for Commercial Banks Taking Account of Market Risk, Chapter II point 1 letter a of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 5/23/DPNP Dated September 29, 2003 concerning Guideline for Calculating Minimum Capital Requirement for Commercial Banks Taking Account of Market Risk and Guideline for Calculating Commercial Banks Net Open Position, Articles 14 and 15 of Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 7/2/PBI/2005 dated January 20, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks, and Chapter III of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 7/3/DPNP dated January 31, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks stipulate rating agencies and ratings that could be used to determine the Qualifying category and determine the quality of Bank’s placement in the form of securities. In connection with the aforementioned, it is necessary to further regulate the eligibility criteria for rating agencies, updating of rating agency list, acknowledgment of
Unofficial translation
rating agencies and minimum ratings, as well as other relevant issues in a Bank Indonesia Circular Letter, with the following principles:
I. GENERAL
1. Rating agency is one of the most important element in the operations of
financial market whose role is increasing in line with the rapid developmennt of the global financial market.
2. The role of rating agencies in supporting the operations of a financial system,
among others, is to endorse financial market transparency and to promote an efficient investment that could support the acceleration of economic growth.
3. Rating agency that could be considered as a rating agency acknowledged by
Bank Indonesia is a rating agency that complies with eligibility criteria.
4. The minimum rating acknowledged by Bank Indonesia is a certain investment
grade stipulated by Bank Indonesia.
5. Bank Indonesia shall perform the updating of list of acknowledged rating
agencies and minimum rating based on the result of evaluation and supervision of rating agencies concerned.
II. RATING AGENCY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES
The general principles in determining eligibility criteria of rating agencies, among others:
Unofficial translation
a. The stipulated eligibility criteria must not hinder the development of rating industry but shall stimulate a sound competition which subsequently could create market discipline. b. The eligibility criteria is for the purpose of encouraging rating agencies in creating credible ratings.
c. The eligibility criteria is stipulated in accordance with international
standards and pratices in order to support consistencies among regulators, particularly in conducting evaluation and acknowledgement of rating agencies of regional and international scale. d. A few international standards, principles and ethical codes which become a reference in stipulating the eligibility criteria, among others, are the criteria stpulated in the International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards (A Revised Framework) by Basel Committee on Banking Supervision of Bank for International Settlements.
2. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
The criteria which become a reference in conducting evaluation of rating agencies are as follows:
a. Independence
This criteria is used to evaluate the level of independence of a rating agency from all interests, e.g. economic interest, social and political interests, both direct and indirect, in determining the rating results.
Unofficial translation
b. Objectivity
This criteria is used to evaluate the level of objectivity and effectiveness of the rating process, methodology used and developed, suitability and consistency of the rating criteria in each process of evaluation and stipulation of a rating for a company (borrower) or for an issuance of securities.
c. International Public Access (Transparency)
This criteria is used to evaluate the transparency of a rating agency of all information related to rating results, including assumptions and background of the issuance of rating results to the public. d. Disclosures This criteria is used to evaluate the disclosure of all matters regarding a rating agency to enable the public and regulators to perform an evaluation on the independence, objectivity, capability, operations of the rating agency, as well as its compliance with prevailing regulations. e. Resources This criteria is used to evaluate the capability of a rating agency in managing its rating service business in terms of human resources and financial resources which enable the rating agency to operate independently and professionally. f. Credibility
Unofficial translation
This criteria is used to evaluate the market acknowledgement and acceptability regarding the existence of the rating agency as a credible rating service provider.
III. UPDATING OF RATING AGENCY LIST
Unofficial translation
creating an insider trading, disclosing a confidential or non-public information regarding a condition of a rated company to other parties without prior consent, performing negotiation for a higher rating than the actual condition, and performing an unsound competition, e.g., by offering a higher rating to a client of another rating agency; and/or d. A rating agency has committed a violation against relevant rules and regulations.
4. Based on the evaluation on the compliance with rating agency registration
criteria for the purpose of rating Bank owned securities, Bank Indonesia may include the rating agency concerned on the list of acknowledged rating agencies.
IV. ACKNOWLEDGED RATING AGENCY AND MINIMUM RATING
Unofficial translation
the Qualifying category. b. Article 14 paragraph (2) of Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 7/2/PBI/2005 dated January 20, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks and Chapter III of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 7/3/DPNP dated January 31, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks, among others, provide that the quality of:
1) Securities traded inactively in an Indonesian stock exchange and or
securities that do not have transparent market value information; or
2) Securities acknowledged based on gained price,
is categorized as Current insofar the securities concerned have investment grade, coupons or similar are paid promptly in the proper amount according to contract, and the securities concerned have not reached matured.
c. In connection with the implementation of the aforementioned
provisions, rating agencies and minimum ratings acknowledged by Bank Indonesia as investment grade shall be as provided in Attachment I.
2. Furthermore, referring to Article 14 paragraph (2) letter b and Article 15 of
Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 7/2/PBI/2005 dated January 20, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks, securities will be categorized as Substandard if they have ratings of no less than 1 (one) level below the investment grade, there has been no delay in coupon
Unofficial translation
payments or other similar obligations and they have not matured yet. Ratings of no less than 1 (one) level below the investment grade acknowledged by Bank Indonesia shall be as provided on Attachment II.
3. For securities acknowledged based on market value, in accordance with
Article 14 paragraph (1) of Bank Indonesia Regulation Number
7/2/PBI/2005 dated January 20, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks, one of the criteria to categorize securities in Current quality is the level of trading activitiy of securities traded at a stock exchange in Indonesia, including if the securities are traded over the counter and registered at a stock exchange, insofar the volume of the securities trading is significant and is within arm’s length within the last 10 (ten) working days prior to the reporting date.
V. OTHERS
Unofficial translation
a. Attachment 2 of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 5/23/DPNP dated September 29, 2003 concerning Guideline for Calculating Minimum Capital Requirement for Commercial Banks Taking Account of Market Risk and Guideline for Calculating Commercial Banks Net Open Position; and b.Attachment 2 of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 7/3/DPNP dated January 31, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks, are revoked and declared inapplicable. Provisions in this Circular letter shall come into force as of March 31, 2005. For the public to be informed, it is ordered that this Circular letter be promulgated by placing it in the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia. Kindly be informed. BANK INDONESIA, MAMAN H. SOMANTRI DEPUTY GOVERNOR
Unofficial translation
Attachment I of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 7/ 8 / DPNP dated March 31, 2005 Rating agencies and Investment Grades For The Purpose of Categorizing Securities Owned by Bank In the Qualifying category and Considered Current Minimum Rating Rating agency Short-term Securities Middle and Longterm Securities Moody’s P-3 Baa3 Standard and Poor’s A-3 BBBFitch Ratings F3 BBBPemeringkat Efek Indonesia (Pefindo) idA4 idBBBKasnic Credit Rating Indonesia K-4 BBB-
Unofficial translation
Attachment II of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter No. 7/ 8 / DPNP dated March 31, 2005 Rating agencies and Investment Grades For The Purpose of Categorizing Securities Owned by Bank In the Qualifying category and Considered Substandard Minimum Rating Rating agency Short-term Securities Middle and Longterm Securities Moody’s NP Ba1 Standard and Poor’s B BB+ Fitch Ratings B BB+ Pemeringkat Efek Indonesia (Pefindo) idB idBB+ Kasnic Credit Rating Indonesia K-5 BB+
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
RegAlert holds no document that amends or replaces this one. This is not a check that it is in force: confirm with the regulator.
“Attachment 2 of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 7/3/DPNP dated January 31, 2005 concerning Assets Quality Rating for Commercial Banks, are revoked and declared inapplicable.”
“Attachment 2 of Bank Indonesia Circular Letter Number 5/23/DPNP dated September 29, 2003 ... are revoked and declared inapplicable.”
“Article 12 of Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 5/12/PBI/2003 dated July 17, 2003 concerning The Minimum Capital Requirement for Commercial Banks Taking Account of Market Risk”
This document amends: Circular Letter No. 7/3/DPNP Asset Quality Rating for Commercial Banks and appendix
More like this from BI
We email you every new BI publication the day it's published.
Source: Bank Indonesia — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added