Rule · BCB · 25 Nov 2021 · Resolução CMN 4968

CMN Resolution No. 4,968 — Governs Internal Control Systems of Financial Institutions and Other Entities Authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil

In force from 1 Jan 2022Applies to: Commercial bank

Financial institutions and authorized entities must implement internal control systems compatible with their risk profile, excluding consortium administrators and payment institutions. These systems must ensure operational, information, and compliance objectives through continuous monitoring, segregation of duties, and periodic security tests effective January 1, 2025. An annual report assessing system adequacy must be submitted to the board and retained for five years. Non-compliance is subject to sanctions revoked effective January 1, 2026.

BrazilBanco Central do Brasil
Annotations and obligations
72 obligations · 1 permission · 19 definitions
  • Obligation 72
  • Permission 1
  • Definition / condition 19
  • background, boilerplate

Lineage: Amended

A newer document in RegAlert amends this one; it applies as amended.

Lei nº 4.864, de 29 de novembro de1965 — Cria medidas de estímulo à…1965 · BR-LAWLei nº 4.864, de 29 de novembro de 1965 — Cria medidas de estímulo à Indústria de Construção Civil (Law No. 4,864 of 29 November 1965 — Creates measures to stimulate the civil construction industry) (1965-11-29)Lei nº 6.099, de 12 de setembro de1974 — Dispõe sobre o tratamento …1974 · BR-LAWLei nº 6.099, de 12 de setembro de 1974 — Dispõe sobre o tratamento tributário das operações de arrendamento mercantil e dá outras providências (Law No. 6,099 of 12 September 1974 — tax treatment of financial leasing (arrendamento mercantil) operations) (1974-09-12)Lei nº 10.194, de 14 de fevereirode 2001 — Dispõe sobre a institui…2001 · BR-LAWLei nº 10.194, de 14 de fevereiro de 2001 — Dispõe sobre a instituição de sociedades de crédito ao microempreendedor, altera dispositivos das Leis nos 6.404, 8.029 e 8.934, e dá outras providências (Law No. 10,194 of 14 February 2001 on the establishment of microentrepreneur credit companies, amending Laws 6,404, 8,029 and 8,934) (2001-02-14)+5 moresee all below the graph+5 moreResolution CMN No. 2554 —Provisions on the Implementation …1998 · BCBResolution CMN No. 2554 — Provisions on the Implementation and Operation of an Internal Control System (1998-09-24)Resolution CMN No. 3056 —Regulates internal audit of finan…2002 · BCBResolution CMN No. 3056 — Regulates internal audit of financial institutions and other entities authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil (2002-12-19)Resolution No. 4390 dated2014-12-18Not in RegAlertResolution No. 4390 dated 2014-12-18 — Not in RegAlertCMN Resolution No. 4,968 —Governs Internal Control Syst…2021-11-25 · this documentCMN Resolution No. 4,968 — Governs Internal Control Systems of Financial Institutions and Other Entities Authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil (2021-11-25)CMN Resolution No. 5117 — AmendingResolutions 4.595, 4.860, 4.879, …2024 · BCBCMN Resolution No. 5117 — Amending Resolutions 4.595, 4.860, 4.879, 4.893, 4.949, 4.968, and 4.984 (2024-01-25)CMN Resolution No. 5,178 ofSeptember 26, 20242024 · BCBCMN Resolution No. 5,178 of September 26, 2024 (2024-09-26)Mentions (1)a document that mentions itopen the list below the graph ▾Mentions (1): a document that mentions it without changing it — open the list below the graph
amendssupersedesissued underrefers todashed card: not in RegAlert (or proposed)arrows run from the older text to the one that changes it
The links and the sentences they come from (13)
Supersedes
Amended by
Issued under
+2 more
  • Decree-Law No. 70, of November 21, 1966Not in RegAlert

    “based on ... 1 of Decree-Law No. 70, of November 21, 1966”

  • Provisional Measure No. 2192-70 dated 2001-08-24Not in RegAlert

    “based on ... 1, § 2, of Provisional Measure No. 2,192-70, of August 24, 2001”

Mentions (1): 1 document mentions this one without changing it

What changed in the obligations

Against Resolution CMN No. 3056 — Regulates internal audit of financial institutions and other entities authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil (2002-12-19)

46 new obligations · 1 deadline changed · 1 change of scope · 7 not carried over

10 obligations are the same in both texts.

Changed (2)
  • Scope
    Before
    "Article 2. Internal controls, the provisions of which must be accessible to all employees of the institution in order to ensure that their respective roles in the process and the responsibilities assigned to the various levels of the organization are known, must provide for: III - means to identify and evaluate internal and external factors that may adversely affect the achievement of the instit…
    Now
    Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: II - regarding aspects related to identification and assessment of risks: a) means to identify and continuously assess internal and external factors that may adversely affect the achievement of the institution's objectives and, when applicable, the economic group it integrates;
  • Deadline
    Before
    Paragraph 7. In any of the situations provided for in this article, the institution must keep available and guarantee unrestricted access by the Central Bank of Brazil to the working papers, reports, and any other documents prepared by the institution's internal audit."
    Now
    The report referred to in the main text must: II - remain available to the Central Bank of Brazil for a period of five years.
New in this text (46)
  • Art. 2 The institutions mentioned in Art. 1 must implement and maintain internal control systems compatible with their nature, size, complexity, structure, risk profile, and business model.
  • Art. 3 Internal control systems must aim to achieve the following objectives: II - information: related to voluntary or mandatory disclosure, internal or external, of financial, operational, and managerial information that is useful for the decision-making process; and
  • Art. 3 Internal control systems must aim to achieve the following objectives: III - compliance: related to compliance with legal, regulatory provisions, and those established in internal policies and codes.
  • Art. 4 Internal control systems must: I - be continuous and effective, defining control activities for all levels of business and for all risks to which the institution is exposed;
  • Art. 4 Internal control systems must: II - integrate the routine activities of relevant areas of the institution; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: b) obligation of timely communication to the appropriate management level, by employees, of: 1. problems in operations;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: b) obligation of timely communication to the appropriate management level, by employees, of: 2. situations of non-compliance with conduct standards defined by the institution; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: b) obligation of timely communication to the appropriate management level, by employees, of: 3. violations of institutional policies or legal and regulatory provisions;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: c) prohibition of establishing performance goals that encourage taking risks inconsistent with levels determined by senior management;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: d) formalization of commitment to ethics and integrity, including compliance with the code of ethics or equivalent document; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: e) dissemination of the code of ethics or equivalent document;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: II - regarding aspects related to identification and assessment of risks: c) measures to mitigate intolerable and uncontrolled risks; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: II - regarding aspects related to identification and assessment of risks: d) analysis of the potential occurrence of frauds in activities developed at all levels of business;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: a) control policies and procedures, as well as verification of their compliance;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: c) appropriate activity controls for different departments or business areas;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: d) physical controls over valuable assets, such as restricted access, dual custody, and periodic inventories;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: e) verification of compliance with exposure limits and monitoring of non-conformity situations;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: f) approval and authorization system for sensitive transactions and verification and reconciliation;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: i) controls aimed at preventing the institution's involvement in improper or illegal activities, especially those related to social, environmental, and climate risks;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: j) procedures and controls provided for in current legislation and regulation, aiming to prevent the use of the financial system for the practice of "money laundering" or concealment of assets, rights, and values, and terrorism financing; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: k) controls for prevention, detection, investigation, and correction of frauds;
  • c) methodologies for recording and maintaining internal institutional information, such as financial, operational, and compliance data;
  • d) guidelines for the use of external information sources and for disclosure to the external public about events and market conditions relevant to decision-making;
  • e) reliable information systems and respective security and independent monitoring measures for their maintenance;
  • f) requirements related to adequate processing of information in electronic format and provision of an adequate audit trail;
  • h) business recovery and contingency plans for situations of interruption of the institution's service provision due to events outside its control, providing for the use of remote physical facilities, including services provided by third parties; and
  • c) systematic monitoring of developed activities, to evaluate, at minimum, whether: 1. the institution's objectives are being achieved;
  • d) update of premises, methodologies, and risk management models; and
  • e) methodology and channels for reporting on deficiencies in internal controls to responsible parties, the board of directors, and the administrative council, in case of material failures.
  • Art. 6 Systematic monitoring of activities related to internal control systems must be subject to an annual report containing: I - the assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems;
  • Art. 6 Systematic monitoring of activities related to internal control systems must be subject to an annual report containing: II - recommendations regarding any deficiencies, with the establishment of a remediation schedule, where applicable; and
  • Art. 6 Systematic monitoring of activities related to internal control systems must be subject to an annual report containing: III - the statement of those responsible for the corresponding areas regarding deficiencies found in previous verifications and measures effectively adopted to remedy them.
  • The report referred to in the main text must: I - be submitted to the board of directors or, if nonexistent, to the Executive Management, as well as to the institution's internal and external audits; and
  • Art. 7 The Executive Management and the Board of Directors must actively engage in defining internal control systems, through: I - the promotion of high ethical and integrity standards;
  • Art. 7 The Executive Management and the Board of Directors must actively engage in defining internal control systems, through: II - the establishment of an organizational culture emphasizing the relevance of internal control systems and the engagement of each employee in the internal control process;
  • Art. 7 The Executive Management and the Board of Directors must actively engage in defining internal control systems, through: III - the maintenance of an adequate organizational structure to guarantee the quality and effectiveness of internal control systems and processes; and
  • Art. 7 The Executive Management and the Board of Directors must actively engage in defining internal control systems, through: IV - the guarantee of adequate and sufficient resources for the exercise of activities related to internal control systems, in an independent, objective, and effective manner.
  • Art. 8 The board of directors is responsible for ensuring that: I - the institution's executive management takes necessary measures to identify, measure, monitor, and control risks according to defined risk levels;
  • Art. 8 The board of directors is responsible for ensuring that: II - identified failures are promptly corrected;
  • Art. 8 The board of directors is responsible for ensuring that: III - the institution's executive management monitors the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems; and
  • Art. 8 The board of directors is responsible for ensuring that: IV - internal control systems are implemented and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this Resolution.
  • For institutions that do not have a board of directors, the responsibilities provided for in the main text must be attributed to the institution's executive management.
  • Art. 9 The institution's Executive Management is responsible for: I - implementing the guidelines regarding internal control systems approved by the board of directors; and
  • Art. 9 The institution's Executive Management is responsible for: II - monitoring the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems.
  • Art. 10. The institutions mentioned in Art. 1 must designate to the Central Bank of Brazil a director responsible for compliance with the provisions of this Resolution.
  • The director mentioned in the main text may perform other functions in the institution, provided there is no conflict of interest.
Not carried over (7)
  • "Article 2. Internal controls, the provisions of which must be accessible to all employees of the institution in order to ensure that their respective roles in the process and the responsibilities assigned to the various levels of the organization are known, must provide for: VII - the existence of periodic security tests for information systems, especially those maintained in electronic media.
  • Paragraph 2. The internal audit activity must be part of the internal control system.
  • Paragraph 3. The activity referred to in paragraph 2, when not carried out by a specific unit of the institution itself or of an institution belonging to the same financial conglomerate, may be performed: I - by an independent auditor duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM), provided that it is not the one responsible for the audit of the financial statements;
  • Paragraph 3. The activity referred to in paragraph 2, when not carried out by a specific unit of the institution itself or of an institution belonging to the same financial conglomerate, may be performed: II - by the audit of the entity or class association or central body to which the institution is affiliated;
  • Paragraph 3. The activity referred to in paragraph 2, when not carried out by a specific unit of the institution itself or of an institution belonging to the same financial conglomerate, may be performed: III - by the audit of an entity or class association of other entities authorized to operate by the Central Bank of Brazil, through an agreement, previously approved by the Central Bank, signed …
  • Paragraph 4. In the case where the internal audit activity is carried out by a unit of the institution itself, it must be directly subordinate to the board of directors or, in the absence thereof, to the management of the institution.
  • Paragraph 5. In the case where the internal audit activity is carried out according to one of the options established in paragraph 3, the person responsible for its execution must report directly to the board of directors or, in the absence thereof, to the management of the institution.

Against Resolution CMN No. 2554 — Provisions on the Implementation and Operation of an Internal Control System (1998-09-24)

36 new obligations · 1 changed obligation · 1 deadline changed · 1 change of scope · 1 change of who is bound · 11 not carried over

17 obligations are the same in both texts.

Changed (4)
  • Scope
    Before
    Article 2. The internal controls, the provisions of which must be accessible to all employees of the institution to ensure that their respective role in the process and the responsibilities assigned to the various levels of the organization are known, must provide for: III - means to identify and evaluate internal and external factors that may adversely affect the achievement of the institution's…
    Now
    Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: II - regarding aspects related to identification and assessment of risks: a) means to identify and continuously assess internal and external factors that may adversely affect the achievement of the institution's objectives and, when applicable, the economic group it integrates;
  • What must be done
    Before
    Article 2. The internal controls, the provisions of which must be accessible to all employees of the institution to ensure that their respective role in the process and the responsibilities assigned to the various levels of the organization are known, must provide for: V - the continuous evaluation of the various risks associated with the institution's activities;
    Now
    a) continuous monitoring of the effectiveness of internal control systems and the main risks associated with the institution's activities;
  • Deadline
    Before
    Article 3. The systematic monitoring of activities related to the internal control system must be the subject of reports, at least semi-annually, containing: I - the conclusions of the examinations carried out;
    Now
    Art. 6 Systematic monitoring of activities related to internal control systems must be subject to an annual report containing: I - the assessment of the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems;
  • Who is bound
    Before
    The conclusions, recommendations, and statements referred to in items I, II, and III of this article: I - must be submitted to the board of directors or, in the absence thereof, to the management, as well as to the institution's external auditor;
    Now
    The report referred to in the main text must: I - be submitted to the board of directors or, if nonexistent, to the Executive Management, as well as to the institution's internal and external audits; and
New in this text (36)
  • Art. 3 Internal control systems must aim to achieve the following objectives: II - information: related to voluntary or mandatory disclosure, internal or external, of financial, operational, and managerial information that is useful for the decision-making process; and
  • Art. 3 Internal control systems must aim to achieve the following objectives: III - compliance: related to compliance with legal, regulatory provisions, and those established in internal policies and codes.
  • Art. 4 Internal control systems must: II - integrate the routine activities of relevant areas of the institution; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: b) obligation of timely communication to the appropriate management level, by employees, of: 1. problems in operations;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: b) obligation of timely communication to the appropriate management level, by employees, of: 2. situations of non-compliance with conduct standards defined by the institution; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: b) obligation of timely communication to the appropriate management level, by employees, of: 3. violations of institutional policies or legal and regulatory provisions;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: c) prohibition of establishing performance goals that encourage taking risks inconsistent with levels determined by senior management;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: d) formalization of commitment to ethics and integrity, including compliance with the code of ethics or equivalent document; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: I - regarding aspects related to control culture: e) dissemination of the code of ethics or equivalent document;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: II - regarding aspects related to identification and assessment of risks: c) measures to mitigate intolerable and uncontrolled risks; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: II - regarding aspects related to identification and assessment of risks: d) analysis of the potential occurrence of frauds in activities developed at all levels of business;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: c) appropriate activity controls for different departments or business areas;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: d) physical controls over valuable assets, such as restricted access, dual custody, and periodic inventories;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: e) verification of compliance with exposure limits and monitoring of non-conformity situations;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: f) approval and authorization system for sensitive transactions and verification and reconciliation;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: i) controls aimed at preventing the institution's involvement in improper or illegal activities, especially those related to social, environmental, and climate risks;
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: j) procedures and controls provided for in current legislation and regulation, aiming to prevent the use of the financial system for the practice of "money laundering" or concealment of assets, rights, and values, and terrorism financing; and
  • Art. 5 Internal control systems must provide for: III - regarding aspects related to control activities and segregation of functions: k) controls for prevention, detection, investigation, and correction of frauds;
  • c) methodologies for recording and maintaining internal institutional information, such as financial, operational, and compliance data;
  • d) guidelines for the use of external information sources and for disclosure to the external public about events and market conditions relevant to decision-making;
  • e) reliable information systems and respective security and independent monitoring measures for their maintenance;
  • f) requirements related to adequate processing of information in electronic format and provision of an adequate audit trail;
  • h) business recovery and contingency plans for situations of interruption of the institution's service provision due to events outside its control, providing for the use of remote physical facilities, including services provided by third parties; and
  • b) periodic assessments, including by internal audit, regarding the effectiveness of internal control systems and the main risks associated with the institution's activities;
  • c) systematic monitoring of developed activities, to evaluate, at minimum, whether: 3. any identified deviations are being promptly corrected;
  • e) methodology and channels for reporting on deficiencies in internal controls to responsible parties, the board of directors, and the administrative council, in case of material failures.
  • Art. 7 The Executive Management and the Board of Directors must actively engage in defining internal control systems, through: III - the maintenance of an adequate organizational structure to guarantee the quality and effectiveness of internal control systems and processes; and
  • Art. 7 The Executive Management and the Board of Directors must actively engage in defining internal control systems, through: IV - the guarantee of adequate and sufficient resources for the exercise of activities related to internal control systems, in an independent, objective, and effective manner.
  • Art. 8 The board of directors is responsible for ensuring that: I - the institution's executive management takes necessary measures to identify, measure, monitor, and control risks according to defined risk levels;
  • Art. 8 The board of directors is responsible for ensuring that: II - identified failures are promptly corrected;
  • Art. 8 The board of directors is responsible for ensuring that: III - the institution's executive management monitors the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems; and
  • For institutions that do not have a board of directors, the responsibilities provided for in the main text must be attributed to the institution's executive management.
  • Art. 9 The institution's Executive Management is responsible for: I - implementing the guidelines regarding internal control systems approved by the board of directors; and
  • Art. 9 The institution's Executive Management is responsible for: II - monitoring the adequacy and effectiveness of internal control systems.
  • Art. 10. The institutions mentioned in Art. 1 must designate to the Central Bank of Brazil a director responsible for compliance with the provisions of this Resolution.
  • The director mentioned in the main text may perform other functions in the institution, provided there is no conflict of interest.
Not carried over (11)
  • Paragraph 2. It is the responsibility of the institution's board of directors: II - the establishment of objectives and procedures pertinent to the same;
  • Article 2. The internal controls, the provisions of which must be accessible to all employees of the institution to ensure that their respective role in the process and the responsibilities assigned to the various levels of the organization are known, must provide for: VII - the existence of periodic security tests for information systems, especially those maintained in electronic media.
  • Paragraph 2. The internal audit activity must be part of the internal control system.
  • Paragraph 3. The activity referred to in paragraph 2, when not executed by a specific unit of the institution itself or of an institution part of the same financial conglomerate, may be exercised: I - by an independent auditor duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission - CVM, provided that it is not the one responsible for the audit of the financial statements;
  • Paragraph 3. The activity referred to in paragraph 2, when not executed by a specific unit of the institution itself or of an institution part of the same financial conglomerate, may be exercised: II - by the audit of the entity or class association or central body to which the institution is affiliated;
  • Paragraph 3. The activity referred to in paragraph 2, when not executed by a specific unit of the institution itself or of an institution part of the same financial conglomerate, may be exercised: III - by the audit of an entity or class association of other institutions authorized to operate by the Central Bank, by agreement, previously approved by it, signed between the entity to which the inst…
  • Paragraph 4. In the case where the internal audit activity is exercised by its own unit, it must be directly subordinate to the board of directors or, in the absence thereof, to the institution's management.
  • Paragraph 5. In the case where the internal audit activity is exercised according to one of the options established in paragraph 3, the person responsible for its execution must report directly to the board of directors or, in the absence thereof, to the institution's management.
  • Article 5. The internal control system must be implemented by December 31, 1999, observing the following schedule: I - definition of the internal structures that will make the implementation and corresponding monitoring effective - by January 31, 1999;
  • Article 5. The internal control system must be implemented by December 31, 1999, observing the following schedule: II - definition and availability of pertinent procedures - by June 30, 1999.
  • The institution's external auditor must make specific mention, in its opinions, of the compliance with the schedule established in this article.

“Not carried over” means the sentence has no counterpart in this text; the rule can still be in force in another text.

Similar documents from other regulators

More like this from BCB

BCB published 10 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.

Source: Banco Central do Brasil — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works

In RegAlert: added · updated