Enforcement · FSCA · 16 Jan 2025
The Financial Sector Conduct Authority has issued an administrative sanction against Credicover CC for failing to comply with key provisions of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act. The regulator identified deficiencies in the company’s risk management programme, employee training, client identification processes, and transaction record-keeping. Credicover must pay a R125,000 financial penalty by 20 March 2020 while simultaneously updating and distributing its risk programme to staff and completing mandatory compliance training.
Transitional Management Committee:
AM Sithole (Commissioner) DP Tshidi CD da Silva JA Boyd MM du Toit LP Kekana K Gibson OB Makhubela P Mogase ENQUIRIES: Mrs Viloshnee Naidoo DIALLING NO.: 012 422 2993 OUR REF: FSP 45735 FAX: 012 346 6533 DATE: 17 February 2020 E-MAIL: Viloshnee.Naidoo@fsca.co.za Mr PFJ Pretorius Money Laundering Compliance Officer Credicover CC P O Box 25775 MONUMENT PARK Per e-mail: frans@crediciover.co.za Dear Sir NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTION
2.2. In terms of section 43 of the FIC Act Credicover must provide ongoing training to its
employees to enable them to comply with the provisions of the FIC Act and RMCP applicable to them. Credicover has to date not provided ongoing training to enable the juristic representatives to comply with the provisions of the FIC Act and the RMCP which are applicable to them.
2.3. In terms of section 21 of the FIC Act Credicover must, in the course of concluding a single
transaction or establishing a business relationship and in accordance with its RMCP, establish and identify clients and other persons. As Credicover did not conduct a risk assessment of its clients, Credicover did not discharge its duty in establishing and verifying the identity of its funeral clients.
2.4. In terms of section 22A of the FIC Act, Credicover must keep record of every transaction,
whether the transaction is a single transaction or concluded in the course of a business relationship which Credicover has with a client, that are reasonably necessary to enable that transaction to be readily reconstructed. The FSCA found that Credicover failed to comply with the provisions of section 22A of the FIC Act.
3. Reasons for imposing the administrative sanction
3.1. The response received relating to developing, documenting, maintaining and
implementing the RMCP is contradictory. The response was that “the RMCP was not drawn up in the required format, but the identification of risk, assessment and mitigation were in place although the document, attached to the Notice received, was not considered as it was not in the correct format and wrong wordings was used.” Mr Pretorius referred to a FICA Risk Assessment Document that incorporated risk indicators as the RMCP. It was not an RMCP drafted in accordance with section 42 of FIC. This document identified certain risk indicators however Mr Pretorius could not explain how such indicators contributed to money laundering/ terrorist financing risk. Further what is provided for on the RMCP and the documentation forwarded in support of a risk assessment done are also contradictory. The risk indicators as provided in Annexure A of the RMCP dated 01/11/2019 is not in accordance with the risk factors in the Provest Trust client file.
3.2. Credicover has to date not provided training to its employees on the provisions of the FIC
Act and its RMCP. The response received by Credicover on the 15 January 2020
indicates “The compulsory FICA training and assessment will be enforced during the meetings with JRs in the next 3 months. In the meantime, a communication was sent in January how to register and follow the process.”;
3.3. The response received relating to not identifying the nineteen funeral insurance clients
was not the explanation provided at the FIC inspection on 01 August 2019. Mr Pretorius’s response during the inspection was that Liberty Group Limited FSP 2409 (Liberty) advised him to not identify and verify such clients and that this should be done only at claims stage.
3.4. The response received about assistance sought from Liberty with regard to the obligation
to keep records is confusing and unclear. It provides that “although the documents were not in the correct format which was subsequently corrected” and that “he has been in communication with Liberty regarding the above and requested assistance from Liberty.”
3.5. All accountable institutions were given a grace period of 18 months, since the
amendments to the FIC Act, to implement the revised provisions;
3.6. Credicover has subsequent to the inspection drafted its RMCP. There is, however,
interpretation and implementation flaws that were noted which are not aligned to its business operations.
4. Particulars of the administrative sanction:
4.1. In terms of section 45C (1), read with sections 45C(3)(c), 45C(6)(a), 42(2C), 42(3) and 43,
Credicover is directed to:
4.1.1. Review the RMCP to ensure it remains relevant to its operations and achievement
of the requirements in section 42(2) of the FIC Act;
4.1.2. Avail the RMCP to each employee involved in transactions to which the FIC Act
applies by 15 February 2020; and
4.1.3. Provide ongoing training to Credicover employees by 29 February 2020 to enable
them to comply with the provisions of the FIC Act and RMCP which are applicable to them.
4.2. In terms of section 45C (1), read with sections 45C(3)(e), and 45C(6)(a) of the FIC Act,
the FSCA hereby imposes a financial penalty in the amount of R125 000 on Credicover
for non-compliance of section 42(1) read together with Guidance Note 7, section 43,
section 21 and section 22A. The penalty amount is calculated as follows:
4.2.1. R10 000 for failure to develop, document, maintain and implement a RMCP in
terms of section 42(1) of the FIC Act read with Guidance Note 7;
4.2.2. R10 000 for failure to provide ongoing training to its employees to enable them to
comply with the provisions of the FIC Act and RMCP applicable to them in terms of
section 43 of the FIC Act;
4.2.3. R95 000 for failure to conduct customer due diligence on its clients in terms of
section 21 of the FIC Act;
4.2.4. R10 000 for failure to keep record of every transaction, whether the transaction is a
single transaction or concluded in the course of a business relationship which Credicover has with a client, that are reasonably necessary to enable that transaction to be readily reconstructed in terms of section 22A of the FIC Act.
4.3. Credicover is directed to pay the financial penalty of R125 000 on or before Friday 20
March 2020.
4.4. The financial penalty is payable via electronic fund transfer to:
Account Name : NRF – FIC Act Sanctions
Account Holder : National Treasury
Account Number : 80552749
Bank : South African Reserve Bank
Code : 910145
Reference : FSCA Sanction – Credicover CC
4.5. Proof of payment must be submitted to the FSCA to Viloshnee.Naidoo@fsca.co.za and
copy Charl.Geel@fsca.co.za.
5. Right of appeal:
5.1. In terms of section 45D of the FIC Act, read with Regulation 27C of the Regulations
promulgated in terms of GN R1595 in GG 24176 of 20 December 2002 as amended, Credicover may lodge an appeal within 30 days, from the date of receipt of the Notice. The notice of appeal and proof of payment of the mandatory appeal fee must be-:
5.1.1. hand delivered to:
The Secretary: The FIC Act Appeal Board
Byls Bridge Office Park, Building 11
13 Candela Street
Highveld Extension
Centurion
5.1.2. sent via electronic mail to:
The HOD: Office of General Counsel
FSCA
Attention: Mr Stefanus Rossouw (Stefanus.Rossouw@fsca.co.za)
5.2. Mr Vongani Khoza, Secretary of the FIC Act Appeal Board, may be contacted at
Vongani.Khosa@fic.gov.a and telephonically at (012) 641-6241 / 082 437 6371. Should Credicover require further information regarding the appeal process. Details of the appeal process can also be found on the FIC’s website at www.fic.gov.za.
6. Failure to comply with the administrative sanction
6.1. In terms of section 45(C)(7)(b) of the FIC Act, should Credicover fail to pay the prescribed
financial penalty in accordance with this notice and an appeal has not been lodged within the prescribed period, the FSCA may forthwith file with the clerk or registrar of a competent court a certified copy of this notice, which shall thereupon have the effect of a civil judgement lawfully given in that court in favour of the FSCA.
7. Publication of sanction:
7.1 The FSCA will make public the decision and the nature of the sanction imposed in terms
of section 45C (11) of the FIC Act.
For Financial Sector Conduct Authority
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
The documents this one cites, and the documents that cite it.
“has failed to comply with the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FIC Act). Accordingly, the FSCA hereby issues this Administrative Sanction Notice”
More like this from FSCA
We email you every new FSCA publication the day it's published.
Source: Financial Sector Conduct Authority — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated