Guidance · EBA · 22 Dec 2025
The European Banking Authority issues these amending guidelines to update the assessment of third-country confidentiality regimes, explicitly incorporating requirements from the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). The document confirms the equivalence of confidentiality frameworks for authorities in Australia, China, Montenegro, Peru, Serbia, and the UK, thereby facilitating the sharing of confidential information with these jurisdictions. These guidelines apply to competent authorities for establishing cooperation arrangements and supervisory colleges, with an application date of May 4, 2026.
EBA/GL/2025/05
22/12/2025
Final Report
Guidelines amending Guidelines EBA/GL/2022/04 on the equivalence of confidentiality regimes
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES Contents 1.Executive Summary 3 2.Background and rationale 4 3.Guidelines 7 4.Accompanying documents 22
4.1 Views of the Banking Stakeholder Group (BSG) 22
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES These amending Guidelines will be translated into the official EU languages and published on the EBA website. The deadline for competent authorities to report whether they comply with the amending Guidelines will be two months after the publication of the translations. The amending Guidelines will apply two months after the publication date at the latest.
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
2. Background and rationale
2.1 Background
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
3. The Guidelines provide guidance that should inform the opinions of competent authorities,
and by extension that of the EBA, about the equivalence of the confidentiality and professional secrecy framework in third countries before engaging with authorities in these jurisdictions. Regarding the assessments under the AMLD, these Guidelines will continue to apply until such time that they are replaced with a similar legal instrument published by the EU single AML Supervisor7 (AMLA).
4. These Guidelines do not include guidance on whether there is a need for a cooperation
arrangement between competent authorities or the EBA and a third-country authority or on whether a third-country authority should participate in a supervisory or resolution college.
2.2 Rationale
5. Upon the publication of MiCAR, the EBA performed an analysis of confidentiality and professional secrecy requirements under that Regulation. As a result, the EBA concluded that
the existing guidelines (EBA/GL/2022/04) should be amended to reflect the new requirements and how they are embedded in the EBA’s equivalence assessment methodology.
6. The EBA decided to amend the section on the subject matter in the guidelines. It explains
that the EBA’s assessments now also cover confidentiality and professional secrecy provisions in Article 100 of MiCAR.
7. The section on the scope of application in the guidelines was also amended. It explains that
the equivalence assessments of third-country authorities listed in the Annex to the amended Guidelines should also be considered by competent authorities in the context of
Article 107 of MiCAR.
8. Furthermore, the amended Guidelines clarify that the definitions set out in MiCAR apply to
these Guidelines.
9. The Annex to the amended Guidelines lists, in an alphabetical order, recent EBA assessments of third-country frameworks:
a) Australia, Montenegro, Serbia: The assessment of regimes applicable to the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), the Central Bank of Montenegro, and the National Bank of Serbia focused on the equivalence with the confidentiality 7 Article 54(5) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1620 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 establishing the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010, (EU) No 1094/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 (OJ L, 2024/1620, 19.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1620/oj) provides that: ‘[…] Provided that they are still relevant, the guidelines and recommendations issued by the EBA, or by supervisors and FIUs pursuant to Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 40) and Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 shall remain applicable until such time as the new guidelines and recommendations issued by the Authority on the same subject start to apply […].’
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES and professional secrecy rules under AMLD. All three regimes were deemed equivalent. For the Central Bank of Montenegro and the National Bank of Serbia, the assessment was supplementary to the previous assessment of confidentiality and professional secrecy performed by the EBA under the CRD. For Serbia, this supplementary assessment recognisesthat Articles 102a, 109, and 117 of the Law on Banks have been replaced by different legal provisions and this change has been reflected in the amended Guidelines. b) United Kingdom and Peru: The frameworks of the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority of UK and the Superintendency of Banks, Insurance and Pension Fund Administrators of Peru were assessed as equivalent with CRD, PSD, BRRD and AMLD. c) China: The National Financial Regulatory Administration (successor to the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission8) maintains equivalence with CRD, PSD, BRRD and AMLD.
10. Under Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, the EBA must, where appropriate,
conduct public consultation, cost-benefit analysis (CBA), and seek advice of the Banking Stakeholder Group (BSG). In this case, no public consultation or CBA was carried out by the EBA as these guidelines apply only to competent authorities, concern inter-authority practices, and have no direct impact on financial institutions. the EBA consulted the BSG on 26 November 2025 via written procedure and received no comments on the amended Guidelines. 8 The EBA communication on the National Financial Regulatory Administration (NFRA) of China, available here
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
3. Guidelines
amending Guidelines EBA/GL/2022/04 on the equivalence of confidentiality regimes
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
2. Addresses
5. These guidelines are addressed to (i) competent authorities as defined in point (2) of Article 4
of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 and (ii) competent authorities as defined in point (35) of
Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2023/111410.
3. Implementation
Date of application
6. These Guidelines apply from 04.05.2026.
10 Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937 (OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, p. 40, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj).
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
4. Amendments
7. Guideline EBA/GL/2022/04 is amended as follows:
8. Paragraph 2 is replaced as follows:
‘5. These Guidelines concern the assessment by competent authorities of whether the confidentiality and professional secrecy regime to which the third-country authorities mentioned in the Annex are subject is equivalent to the conditions set out in Title VII,
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
Chapter 1, Section II of Directive 2013/36/EU 11 ; in Article 24 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 12 ; in Chapter VI, Section 3, Subsection IIIa of Directive (EU)2015/84913; in Article 84 and 98 of Directive 2014/59/EU14 and in Article 100
of Regulation (EU) 2023/111415.’
9. Paragraph 3 is replaced as follows:
‘6. These guidelines apply to competent authorities’ assessment of the equivalence of the confidentiality regime to which the third-country supervisory authorities listed in the Annex are subject to for the following purposes:
11 Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176 27.6.2013, p. 338, ELI : http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/36/oj). 12 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337 23.12.2015, p. 35, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2015/2366/oj). 13 Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2015/849/oj). 14 Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/59/oj). 15 Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937 (OJ L 150, 9.6.2023, p. 40, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj).
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES a. in order to conclude cooperation arrangements with the third-country authority in accordance with Article 55 of Directive 2013/36/EU and Article 107(5) of Regulation (EU) 2023/114 also for the purposes of Article 24 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366 and
Article 57a (5) of Directive (EU) 2015/849, or in accordance with Article 97 and 98 (1)
of Directive 2014/59/EU; and b. in order to enable the participation of the third-country authority in supervisory and resolution colleges in accordance with Article 116 (6) of Directive 2013/36/EU and Articles 88 and 89 of Directive 2014/59/EU; and in AML/CFT colleges in accordance with
Chapter VI, Section 3, Subsection IIIa of Directive (EU) 2015/849 and the AML/CFT Colleges Guidelines16.’
10. Paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
‘7. These guidelines are addressed to (i) competent authorities as defined in point (2) of
Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 and (ii) competent authorities as defined in
point (35) of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114.’
11. Paragraph 5 is replaced by the following
‘8. Unless otherwise specified, terms used and defined in Directive 2013/36/EU, Directive (EU) 2015/2366, Directive 2014/59/EU, Directive (EU) 2015/849 and Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 have the same meaning in the Guidelines.’
12. Paragraphs 6 and 7 are renumbered as paragraphs 9 and 10 respectively.
13. Paragraph 9 is replaced by the following:
‘9. For the purposes of applying Article 55 of Directive 2013/36/EU also in accordance with
Article 24 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366) and 57a (5) of Directive (EU) 2015/849, Article 97
and 98 (1) of Directive 2014/59/EU, Article 116 (6) of CRD and Articles 88 and 89 of Directive 2014/59/EU, the AML/CFT Colleges Guidelines and Article 107(5) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, competent authorities should consider the professional secrecy and confidentiality regime of the third-country authorities referred to in the Annex as equivalent to that set out in:
a. Title VII, Chapter 1, Section II of Directive 2013/36/EU, b. Article 24 of Directive (EU) 2015/2366,
c. Article 84 and 98 of Directive 2014/59/EU,
d. Chapter VI, Section 3, Subsection IIIa of Directive (EU) 2015/849, 16 Joint guidelines on cooperation and information exchange for the purpose of Directive (EU) 2015/849 between competent authorities supervising credit and financial institutions (the AML/CFT Colleges Guidelines) of 16 December 2019, (JC 2019/81).
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES e. Article 100 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114, where relevant depending on the competences of the third-country authority’.
14. The Annex is amended as follows:
a. The footnote 12 is replaced by the following:
‘This column indicates whether the provisions applicable to a third-country authority have been assessed with respect to relevant provisions in Directive 2013/36/EU (1), Directive (EU) 2015/2366 (2), Directive (EU) 2015/849 (3), Directive 2014/59/EU (4), and Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 (5).’
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES b. The following table is inserted after the table concerning the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority:
AUTHORITY ASSESSED
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
PRINCIPLE 1
NOTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 2
OBLIGATION OF PROFESSIONAL SECRECY
PRINCIPLE 3
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 4
RESTRICTIONS ON THE
DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SANCTIONS IN CASES
OF BREACHES OF OBLIGATIONS
OVERALL
ASSESSMENT
AUSTRALIA
Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) https://www.austrac.gov.au/ (3) Part 1, section 5 and
Part 11, section 212
of the Anti-Money
Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006 (AML Act)
Part 11, sections 121,
184 and 224 of the AML
Act
Part 11, sections 125
to 129, section 134 and
section 212(3) of the
AML Act
Part 11 of the AML Act Part 11, sections 121
and Part 15, Section 198 of the AML
Act
Section 15 of the Australian Public Services
Code of Conduct (Section 13 of the Public
Service Act 1999)
Equivalent
c. The table concerning the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission is replaced by the following:
AUTHORITY ASSESSED
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
PRINCIPLE 1
NOTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 2
OBLIGATION OF PROFESSIONAL SECRECY
PRINCIPLE 3
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 4
RESTRICTIONS ON THE
DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SANCTIONS IN CASES
OF BREACHES OF OBLIGATIONS
Overall Assessment
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES CHINA National Financial Regulatory Administration (NFRA) (1) (4) Administrative Rules on Professional Secrecy and Confidentiality (ARPSC), Chapter 10 Civil Servant Law of the People’s Republic of China (CSL, the Order of the PRC President, 2003)
Article 11 of the Law of
the People’s Republic of
China on Banking Regulation and Supervision
(LBRS, the Order of the
PRC President, 2006)
Article 14 and Article 59
of CSL
Article 63, Chapter 10
and Article 32 of ARPSC
NFRA Interim Measures of the Administration of Seconded Personnel NFRA Interim Measures of the Administration of Contract Personnel Rules on Confidentiality Management for Seconded and Contract Personnel of NFRA Headquarters
Article 11 of LBRS
Article 59 of ARPSC
Article 14 and 15 Regulation of the People's
Republic of China on the Disclosure of Government Information (RDGI, issued by the State Council in 2007)
Article 63, Article 77 of
ARPSC
Articles 6, 11 and 14 of
LBRS
Civil Servant Law of the
People's Republic of
China (CSL, 2018)
Regulation on the Punishment of Civil Servants of Administrative Agencies (2007) Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 67 and
Article 43 of LBRS
Articles 77 – 78 of
ARPSC
Civil Servant Law of the
People's Republic of
China (CSL, 2018)
Regulation on the Punishment of Civil Servants of Administrative Agencies (2007) Equivalent
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES Banking Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 43 State Compensation Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 4 Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 54 Tax Collection Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 6 d. The table concerning the Central Bank of Montenegro is replaced by the following:
AUTHORITY ASSESSED
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
PRINCIPLE 1
NOTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 2
OBLIGATION OF PROFESSIONAL SECRECY
PRINCIPLE 3
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 4
RESTRICTIONS ON THE
DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SANCTIONS IN CASES
OF BREACHES OF OBLIGATIONS
Overall Assessment
MONTENEGRO
Central Bank of
Montenegro www.cbcg.me
(1), (3) Article 84, paragraph 1 of the
Central Bank of Montenegro Law (CBML)
Article 203 and Article 344 of the Law on
Credit Institutions
(LCI)
Article 84 paragraphs 1-2
of the Central Bank of
Montenegro Law
Articles 203, 204, 344,
353 and 354 of the LCI
Articles 237, 245 and
344 of the LCI
Article 84, paragraph 3;
Article 76 and 76a of
the CBML
Banking Law Article 107
Articles 6 and 9 of the
Law on The Financial
Stability Council
Article 280 of the Criminal Code
Article 84 of the CBML
Article 26 of the Rulebook on Secrecy
Article 126 of the AML
Law
Equivalent
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
Article 3 of the Law
on Data Secrecy (LDS)
Article 54 of the Payment System Law
Article 2 of the Rulebook on Secrecy
(0101-4014/14-2-
2010 of 30 May 2011,
0101-4014/84-3 of 25
March 2016, 0101-
8380-4/2018 of 6 November 2018)
Article 112 of Law on
the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing (OGM 110/23, 65/24) (AML Law)
Article 29 paragraph 2,
3 and 35 of the Deposit
Protection Law
Articles 336 and 347 of the LCI
Articles 10 and 11 of the Law Governing the
State Audit
Article 134 of the AML
Law e. The following table is inserted after the table concerning the Central Bank of Montenegro:
AUTHORITY ASSESSED
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
PRINCIPLE 1
NOTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 2
OBLIGATION OF PROFESSIONAL SECRECY
PRINCIPLE 3
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 4
RESTRICTIONS ON THE
DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SANCTIONS IN CASES
OF BREACHES OF OBLIGATIONS
Overall Assessment
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES PERU Superintendency of Bank, Insurance and Pension Fund Administrators (SBS) https://www.sbs.g ob.pe/ (1), (2), (3), (4)
Article 140 of the
Law 26702 – General
Law of the Financial and Insurance Systems and Organic Law of the SBS
Article 41 of the Central Bank Law, DL.
26123
Article 17 of the Law
of the Transparency and Access of Public
Information – Law
27806
Article 6 of the Rules to
Protect Confidential Information Exchanged with Regulators and International Organisations (SBS-DIR-SBS-653- 02) Articles 17, 140, 142, 143, 143A, 376 of the Law 26702 – General Law of the Financial and Insurance Systems and Organic Law of the SBS Articles 144, 152, 153, 182, 359, 376, 381 of Law 26702 – General Law of the Financial and Insurance Systems and Organic Law of the SBS Articles 17 and 18 of Law 27806 (TUO D.S. 021-2019-JUS)
Article 97 of the Political Constitution of Peru
Article 376 of Law
26702 – General Law of the Financial and Insurance Systems and Organic Law of the SBS
Article 17, 18 of Law
27806 – TUO D.S. 021-
2019-JUS, Law of the
Transparency and Access of Public Information
Article 87 of Law 27444
– TUO D.S. 004-2019-
JUS (General Administrative Procedure Law)
Article 8.4 of the Rules
to Protect Confidential
Information Exchanged with Regulators and InArticle 165 of the Peruvian Criminal Code Articles 1, 4 Law 27588 – Law Establishing Prohibitions and Incompatibilities of Officials and Public Servants, as well as Persons Who Provide Services to the State under any Contractual Modality
Article 6 of the SBS Directive SBS-DIR-SBS653-02 (Rules to Protect Confidential Information Exchanged with
Regulators and International Organisations)
Equivalent
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES ternational Organisations (SBS-DIR-SBS-653- 02)
Article 36 of Legislative
Decree 1141 on the
National Intelligence
System (SINA) and the
National Directorate of
Intelligence (DINI)
Article 87 of Law 27444
– TUO D.S. No. 004-
2019- JUS Law on General Administrative
Procedure (LPAG) f. The table concerning the National Bank of Serbia is replaced by the following:
AUTHORITY ASSESSED
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
PRINCIPLE 1
NOTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 2
OBLIGATION OF PROFESSIONAL SECRECY
PRINCIPLE 3
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 4
RESTRICTIONS ON THE
DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SANCTIONS IN CASES
OF BREACHES OF OBLIGATIONS
Overall Assessment
SERBIA
National Bank of
Serbia
(1), (3) Article 86a paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Law on the National
Article 86a paragraphs 3
and 4 of the Law on the
National Bank of Serbia
(RS Official Gazette,
Articles 65 and 70 of the Law on the National Bank of Serbia (RS Official Gazette,
Article 65 of the Law
on the National Bank of
Serbia (RS Official Gazette, No 72/2003,
Article 240 of the Criminal Code
Equivalent
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES www.nbs.rs Bank of Serbia (RS Official Gazette, No 72/2003, 55/2004, 85/2005 – other law, 44/2010, 76/2012, 106/2012 14/2015, 40/2015 and Constitutional Court decision, 44/2018 and 19/2025)
Article 9b and Article 46 of the Law on
Banks (RS Official Gazette, No 107/2005,
91/2010 and
14/2015)
Article 112a of the
Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism (RS Official Gazette, Nos 113/2017, 91/2019, 153/2020, 92/2023, 94/2024 and 19/2025) No 72/2003, 55/2004, 85/2005 – other law, 44/2010, 76/2012, 106/2012, 14/2015, 40/2015 and Constitutional Court decision, 44/2018 and 19/2025)
Article 9b, Article 46, Article 47, paragraphs 1
and 2; Article 48; and Article 103, paragraph 2 of the Law on Banks (RS Official Gazette, No 107/2005, 91/2010 and 14/2015) Law on Auditing, Article 29, paragraphs 1 and 2; and Article 38 No 72/2003, 55/2004, 85/2005 – other law, 44/2010, 76/2012, 106/2012, 14/2015, 40/2015 and Constitutional Court decision, 44/2018 and 19/2025)
Article 8, Article 9b, Article 49, Article 103, paragraph 2
and Article 112 of the
Law on Banks (RS Official Gazette,
No 107/2005, 91/2010 and 14/2015)
Article 94 of the Law
on the Prevention of
Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism (RS Official Gazette, Nos 113/2017, 91/2019, 153/2020, 92/2023, 94/2024 and 19/2025) 55/2004, 85/2005 – other law, 44/2010, 76/2012, 106/2012, 14/2015, 40/2015 and Constitutional Court decision, 44/2018 and 19/2025)
Article 8, Article 9b, Article 47; Article 49 and
Article 51b of the Law
on Banks (RS Official
Gazette, No 107/2005,
91/2010 and 14/2015);
Article 112a of the Law
on the Prevention of
Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism (RS Official Gazette, Nos 113/2017, 91/2019, 153/2020, 92/2023, 94/2024 and 19/2025)
Article 98 of the Law
on Data Secrecy
Articles 120 and Article 118, item 51 of the
Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism (RS Official Gazette, Nos 113/2017, 91/2019, 153/2020, 92/2023, 94/2024 and 19/2025)
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES g. The following tables are inserted after the table concerning the American Securities and Exchange Commission:
AUTHORITY ASSESSED
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT
PRINCIPLE 1
NOTION OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 2
OBLIGATION OF PROFESSIONAL SECRECY
PRINCIPLE 3
USE OF CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION
PRINCIPLE 4
RESTRICTIONS ON THE
DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
SANCTIONS IN CASES
OF BREACHES OF OBLIGATIONS
Overall Assessment
UNITED KINGDOM
Financial Conduct
Authority
(FCA) https://www.fca.o rg.uk/
(1), (2), (3), (4) Section 348, subsections (2) and (4) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA)
Section 89L of the
Banking Act 2009
Section 348, subsections (1), (5), (6) and (8)
of the FSMA
Schedule 17A, paragraph 23 of the FSMA
Section 89L of the Banking Act 2009
Section 349 of the
FSMA
Part II, Section 7 of the
Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000 (Disclosure of Confidential
Information) Regulation 2001 (The Disclosure Regulation) The Public Record, Disclosure of Information and Co-operation (Financial Services) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Section 348(1) of the
FSMA
Part II and section 4;
Subsections 5 and 6 of
section 5; and section 7
of the Disclosure Regulation
The financial conduct
Authority – staff handbook
Section 352 of the
FSMA
Equivalent
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES UNITED KINGDOM Prudential Regulation Authority (part of Bank of England) (PRA) https://www.bank ofengland.co.uk/ (1), (2), (3), (4) Section 348 subsections (2) and (4) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA)
Section 89L of the
Banking Act 2009
Section 348, subsections (1), (5), (6) and (8)
of the FSMA
Schedule 17A, paragraph 23 of the FSMA
Section 89L of the Banking Act 2009
Section 349 of the
FSMA
Part II, Section 7 of the
Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000 (Disclosure of Confidential
Information) Regulation 2001 (The Disclosure Regulation) The Public Record, Disclosure of Information and Co-operation (Financial Services) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Section 348(1) of FSMA
Part II and section 4;
Subsections 5 and 6 of
section 5; and section 7
of the Disclosure Regulation
The Bank of England
Code of Conduct
Section 352 of the
FSMA
Equivalent
FINAL REPORT GUIDELINES AMENDING GUIDELINES ON EQUIVALENCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY REGIMES
5. Accompanying documents
2.1 Views of the Banking Stakeholder Group
The Banking Stakeholder Group (BSG) was consulted on the draft amending Guidelines on 26 November 2025 via written procedure. the EBA received no comments from the BSG on the amended Guidelines.
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
More like this from EBA
EBA published 1 document in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.
Source: European Banking Authority — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated