2014-05-14
Added · Updated
EIOPA issued these guidelines to establish a minimum level of supervisory convergence for complaints-handling arrangements by insurance intermediaries. Competent authorities are required to ensure intermediaries implement a written complaints management policy, maintain a dedicated function to investigate complaints fairly, and register and report data on all received complaints. The document further mandates that intermediaries provide clear information about their processes to complainants and respond to complaints within set time limits while explaining options for further redress.
CNB published 1 document in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
EIOPA | WesthafenTower | Westhafenplatz 1 | 60327 Frankfurt | Germany Phone: +49 69 951119(20 | Fax: +49 69 951119(19 | info@eiopa.europa.eu | www.eiopa.europa.eu ©EIOPA 2014
EIOPA(BoS(13/164
27 November 2013
Guidelines on complaintshandling by insurance intermediaries
2/7
© EIOPA 2014
Guidelines on complaintshandling by insurance intermediaries Introduction
OJ L 331 15.12.2010 p. 48
OJ L 009 , 15/01/2003 P. 3 ( 10
Recital 22
Article 10
EIOPA(BoS(13/171
3/7
© EIOPA 2014
6. For the purpose of the Guidelines below, the following indicative definitions,
which do not override equivalent definitions in national law, have been developed:
4/7
© EIOPA 2014
Guideline 1 – Ensuring the right institution deals with the complaint
10. Competent authorities should ensure that:
a) Where a complaint is received by an insurance intermediary (for example, a tied insurance intermediary) for which another financial institution is responsible, and that insurance intermediary does not handle the complaint on behalf of that financial institution, the insurance intermediary should inform the complainant and direct the complaint to the relevant financial institution, where identifiable. b) Where an insurance intermediary complies with Guideline 1, it shall not be required to handle the complaint under Guidelines 2 to 8. Guideline 2 Complaints management policy
11. Competent authorities should ensure that:
a) Insurance intermediaries put in place a complaints management policy. This policy should be defined and endorsed by the insurance intermediary’s senior management, who should also be responsible for its implementation and for monitoring compliance with it. b) This complaints management policy is set out in a (written) document e.g. as part of a “general (fair) treatment policy” (applicable to actual or potential policyholders, insured persons, injured third parties and beneficiaries etc.). c) The complaints management policy is made available to all relevant staff of the insurance intermediary through an adequate internal channel. Guideline 3 Complaints management function
12. Competent authorities should ensure that insurance intermediaries have a
complaints management function which enables complaints to be investigated fairly and, with the exception of insurance intermediaries which are sole traders, possible conflicts of interest to be identified and mitigated. Guideline 4 – Registration
13. Competent authorities should ensure that insurance intermediaries register,
internally, complaints in accordance with national timing requirements in an appropriate manner (for example, through a secure electronic register).
5/7
© EIOPA 2014
Guideline 5 Reporting
14. Competent authorities should ensure that insurance intermediaries are in a
position to provide information on complaints and complaints(handling to the competent national authorities or ombudsman. This data should cover the number of complaints received, differentiated according to their national criteria or own criteria, where relevant. Guideline 6 Internal followup of complaintshandling
15. Competent authorities should ensure that insurance intermediaries analyse, on
an on(going basis, complaints(handling data, to ensure that they identify and address any recurring problems, and potential legal and operational risks, for example, by:
a) Analysing the causes of individual complaints so as to identify root causes common to types of complaint; b) Considering whether such root causes may also affect other processes or products, including those not directly complained of; and c) Correcting, where reasonable to do so, such root causes. Guideline 7 – Provision of information
16. Competent authorities should ensure that insurance intermediaries:
a) On request or when acknowledging receipt of a complaint, provide written information regarding their complaints(handling process. b) Publish details of their complaints(handling process in an easily accessible manner, for example, in brochures, pamphlets, contractual documents or via the insurance intermediary’s website. c) Provide clear, accurate and up(to(date information about the complaints( handling process, which includes:
(i) details of how to complain (e.g. the type of information to be provided by the complainant, the identity and contact details of the person or department to whom the complaint should be directed); (ii) the process that will be followed when handling a complaint (e.g. when the complaint will be acknowledged, indicative handling timelines, the availability of a competent authority, an ombudsman or alternative dispute resolution (ADR) scheme etc.); and d) Keep the complainant informed about further handling of the complaint.
6/7
© EIOPA 2014
Guideline 8 Procedures for responding to complaints
17. Competent authorities should ensure that insurance intermediaries:
a) Seek to gather and investigate all relevant evidence and information regarding the complaint; b) Communicate in plain language, which is clearly understood; c) Provide a response without any unnecessary delay or at least within the time limits set at national level. When an answer cannot be provided within the expected time limits, the insurance intermediary should inform the complainant about the causes of the delay and indicate when the insurance intermediary’s investigation is likely to be completed; and d) When providing a final decision that does not fully satisfy the complainant’s demand (or any final decision, where national rules require it), include a thorough explanation of the insurance intermediary’s position on the complaint and set out the complainant’s option to maintain the complaint e.g. the availability of an ombudsman, ADR mechanism, national competent authorities, etc. Such decision should be provided in writing where national rules require it. Compliance and Reporting Rules
18. This document contains Guidelines issued under Article 16 of the EIOPA
Regulation. In accordance with Article 16(3) of the EIOPA Regulation, competent authorities and financial institutions shall make every effort to comply with guidelines and recommendations.
19. Competent authorities that comply or intend to comply with these Guidelines
should incorporate them into their regulatory or supervisory framework in an appropriate manner.
20. Competent authorities shall confirm to EIOPA whether they comply or intend to
comply with these Guidelines, with reasons for non(compliance, within two months after the date of publication.
21. In the absence of a response by this deadline, competent authorities will be
considered as non(compliant to the reporting and reported as such. Final Provision on Review
22. These Guidelines shall be subject to a review by EIOPA.
7/7
© EIOPA 2014
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
Source: Czech National Bank — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works