Rule · COAF · 9 Apr 2021

Normative Instruction Coaf No. 7, April 9, 2021 – Complementary instructions for communication duties to the Financial Activities Control Council

In force from 1 Jun 2021

Supervised entities must flag and report suspicious transactions via Siscoaf if operations involve third-party payments, cash acquisitions by PEPs, or border vehicle purchases. Communications must detail the analysis motivating the suspicion and are required regardless of specific art. 2 hypotheses if crimes under Law 9,613 are indicated. This instruction enters into force on June 1, 2021, revoking Normative Instruction Coaf No. 4 of October 16, 2015.

BrazilConselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras
Annotations and obligations
21 obligations · 4 definitions
  • Obligation 21
  • Definition / condition 4
  • background, boilerplate

Lineage: Amended

A newer document in RegAlert amends this one; it applies as amended.

amendssupersedesissued underrefers todashed card: not in RegAlert (or proposed)arrows run from the older text to the one that changes it
The links and the sentences they come from (6)
Supersedes
Amended by
Issued under
  • “nos termos da sua Resolução nº 23, de 20 de dezembro de 2012”

  • Decree No. 9.663 dated 2019-01-01Not in RegAlert

    “exercendo as atribuições conferidas pelos incisos II e IV do art. 9º do Estatuto aprovado pelo Decreto nº 9.663, de 1º de janeiro de 2019”

  • Law No. 13.901 dated 2019-11-11Not in RegAlert

    “na forma do art. 9º da Lei nº 13.901, de 11 de novembro de 2019”

  • Law No. 9.613 dated 1998-03-03Not in RegAlert

    “na forma do § 1º do art. 14 da Lei nº 9.613, de 3 de março de 1998”

Mentions (1): 1 document this one mentions without changing it
Refers to

What changed in the obligations

Against Normative Instruction No. 4, of October 16, 2015 – Repealed by COAF Normative Instruction No. 7, of April 9, 2021, effective June 1, 2021 — Disclosed complementary instructions to legal entities that sell motor vehicles, covered by COAF Resolution No. 25, of January 16 (2015-10-16)

13 new obligations · 1 change of scope

4 obligations are the same in both texts.

Changed (1)
  • Scope
    Before
    IV – acquisition or proposal to acquire a motor vehicle with payment made by a third party, without justification, even when authorized by the client.
    Now
    I – any type of acquisition, including of asset, product, service, right or any other good: c) that involves, without a plausible justification: 1. payment by a third party, even if authorized by the beneficiary;
New in this text (13)
  • I – any type of acquisition, including of asset, product, service, right or any other good: a) apparently incompatible with the activities or the economic‑financial capacity of the acquiring party, known or presumed from the circumstances;
  • I – any type of acquisition, including of asset, product, service, right or any other good: b) for which there is observed willingness to negotiate prices or conditions outside market standards;
  • I – any type of acquisition, including of asset, product, service, right or any other good: c) that involves, without a plausible justification: 2. over‑payment followed by a later refund or request for refund of the amount;
  • I – any type of acquisition, including of asset, product, service, right or any other good: c) that involves, without a plausible justification: 3. cancellation or withdrawal and the related refund or request for refund of the payment, in whole or in part;
  • II – any type of acquisition by a public agent or politically exposed person (PEP), as recognized under the applicable legislation, including of asset, product, service, right or any other good, that involves cash resources;
  • III – acquisition of a vehicle intended for aerial or waterborne displacement in a border area or that presents a considerable crime index;
  • V – execution of deposit(s) with cash resources in bank account(s), payment account(s) or equivalent(s) of any type in an amount equal to or greater than the limit established in art. 9, item I, of Coaf Resolution No. 23, of 2012, or in art. 4, item I, of Coaf Resolution No. 25, of 2013, as applicable, even if such amount is verified in relation to a set of multiple situations or operations carri…
  • VI – resistance to providing documentation or information requested for the identification, registration or record of a client or of the operation, or provision of such documentation or information in a manner that may raise doubt about its veracity or accuracy.
  • Art. 3º The communication to Coaf referred to in art. 2 must:
  • I – contain all elements resulting from the analysis referred to in that article that indicate why the supervised entity recognized the situation, operation or proposal as suspicious or atypical, in order to motivate the forwarding of the communication; and
  • II – be carried out, in accordance with art. 12 of Coaf Resolution No. 23, of 2012, and art. 6 of Coaf Resolution No. 25, of 2013, through the Financial Activities Control System (Siscoaf), an electronic means made available on Coaf’s website at its current address https://www. or any other that may succeed it.
  • The analysis referred to in item I of the caput must be demonstrable before Coaf regardless of whether it resulted, or not, in a conclusion that led the supervised entity to forward the communication.
  • Art. 4º Independently of the characterization of any hypothesis indicated in the items of art. 2, any situation, operation or proposal that, by its characteristics regarding the parties involved, values, manner of execution, instruments used or lack of economic or legal basis, may constitute an indication of crimes provided for in Law No. 9,613, of 1998, or be related to them, must be communica…

“Not carried over” means the sentence has no counterpart in this text; the rule can still be in force in another text.

Similar documents from other regulators

More like this from COAF

We email you every new COAF publication the day it's published.

Source: Conselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works

In RegAlert: added · updated