Rule · COAF · 29 Aug 2012

Resolution No. 20, of August 29, 2012 - Revoked

In force from 1 Mar 2013Applies to: Payment service provider, Securitisation company
Ended 1 Mar 2013

Commercial factoring companies, lottery distributors, jewelry/art dealers, luxury goods traders, payment service providers, and various professional intermediaries must implement anti-money laundering policies, maintain detailed client registries, and record all operations. Suspicious transactions must be reported to COAF within 24 hours via their website, while annual zero-transaction declarations are due by January 31. All records and correspondence must be preserved for at least five years. Non-compliance subjects entities and administrators to sanctions under Law No. 9,613/1998.

BrazilConselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras
Annotations and obligations
53 obligations · 3 permissions · 35 definitions
  • Obligation 53
  • Permission 3
  • Definition / condition 35
  • background, boilerplate

Lineage: Superseded

A newer document in RegAlert replaces this one.

Law No. 9,613 of March 3, 1998 —Money Laundering Crimes; Preventi…1998 · BR-LAWLaw No. 9,613 of March 3, 1998 — Money Laundering Crimes; Prevention of Financial System Use for These Illicit Acts; Creation of COAF (1998-03-03)Decreto nº 2.799, de 8 de outubrode 1998 — Aprova o Estatuto do Co…1998 · BR-LAWDecreto nº 2.799, de 8 de outubro de 1998 — Aprova o Estatuto do Conselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras – COAF (Decree No. 2,799 of 8 October 1998 — Approves the Statute of the Council for Financial Activities Control (COAF)) (1998-10-08)Resolution No. 3 of June 2, 19991999 · COAFResolution No. 3 of June 2, 1999 (1999-06-02)Resolution No. 4, of June 2, 1999- Repealed by COAF Resolution No.…1999 · COAFResolution No. 4, of June 2, 1999 - Repealed by COAF Resolution No. 23, of December 20, 2012, in force since June 1, 2013 - Established procedures for individuals or legal entities trading in jewelry, stones, and precious metals (1999-06-02)Resolution No. 9, 5 December 2000- Revoked2000 · COAFResolution No. 9, 5 December 2000 - Revoked (2000-12-05)Resolution No. 14 of October 23,2006 - Revoked by Resolution No. …2006 · COAFResolution No. 14 of October 23, 2006 - Revoked by Resolution No. 26/2013 (2006-10-23)Resolution No. 18 of August 26,2009 - Revoked2009 · COAFResolution No. 18 of August 26, 2009 - Revoked (2009-08-26)Mentions (4)documents this one mentionsopen the list below the graph ▾Mentions (4): documents this one mentions without changing it — open the list below the graphResolution No. 20, of August29, 2012 - Revoked2012-08-29 · this documentResolution No. 20, of August 29, 2012 - Revoked (2012-08-29)Resolution No. 21 of December 20,2012 – Revoked by COAF Resolution…2012 · COAFResolution No. 21 of December 20, 2012 – Revoked by COAF Resolution No. 41 of August 8, 2022 (2012-12-20)
amendssupersedesissued underrefers todashed card: not in RegAlert (or proposed)arrows run from the older text to the one that changes it
The links and the sentences they come from (8)
Superseded by
Supersedes
Issued under
Mentions (4): 4 documents this one mentions without changing them
Refers to

What changed in the obligations

Against Resolution No. 3 of June 2, 1999 (1999-06-02)

47 new obligations · 1 change of scope · 1 change of who is bound · 8 not carried over

2 obligations are the same in both texts.

Changed (2)
  • Who is bound
    Before
    Art. 5° The entities mentioned in art. 1° shall communicate to COAF within twenty-four hours, refraining from informing the winners of such act, any delivery and/or payment of prizes, assets, and values that may configure the hypotheses provided for in art. 4° of this Resolution.
    Now
    Article 8. The persons referred to in Article 1 must communicate to COAF, within 24 (twenty-four) hours, refraining from informing clients, third-party interveners, and other parties involved, the proposal or execution of operations:
  • Scope
    Before
    Art. 8° The records provided for in this Resolution shall be preserved by the entities mentioned in art. 1° for a minimum period of five years, from the delivery and/or payment of the prize.
    Now
    Article 12. The persons referred to in Article 1 must preserve the registries and records referred to in Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of this Resolution, as well as printed and electronic correspondence regarding the execution of operations, for at least 5 (five) years, counted: II - from the conclusion of operations, for respective records and correspondence, and for records provided for in Artic…
New in this text (47)
  • The persons referred to in this article must observe the provisions of this Resolution in all business and operations they carry out, including those involving: I - the purchase or sale of other goods or the provision of other services not pertinent nor linked to the main activity developed; and
  • II – the purchase or sale of movable or immovable goods that constitute their assets.
  • Article 2. The legal persons referred to in Article 1 must establish and implement a money laundering and terrorist financing prevention policy compatible with their size, which must include procedures aimed at:
  • I – identification and performing due diligence for the qualification of clients, third-party interveners, and other parties involved in the operations they carry out;
  • II – obtaining information about the purpose and nature of the business relationship;
  • III – identifying the ultimate beneficial owner of the operations they carry out;
  • IV – identifying suspicious operations or proposals for operations;
  • V – categorizing the operations they carry out and clients into money laundering and terrorist financing risk categories, considering, at a minimum, the following criteria: a) types of clients, third-party interveners, and other parties involved in the operations they carry out;
  • V – categorizing the operations they carry out and clients into money laundering and terrorist financing risk categories, considering, at a minimum, the following criteria: b) types of products and services traded;
  • V – categorizing the operations they carry out and clients into money laundering and terrorist financing risk categories, considering, at a minimum, the following criteria: c) payment methods used; and
  • V – categorizing the operations they carry out and clients into money laundering and terrorist financing risk categories, considering, at a minimum, the following criteria: d) manner of operation execution; and
  • VI – periodic verification of the effectiveness of the adopted policy.
  • § 1. The policy mentioned in the caput must be explicitly formalized, with approval by the holder of the highest management authority, also including procedures for:
  • I - selection and training of employees;
  • II - dissemination of its content to the staff through institutionalized continuous processes;
  • III - monitoring of activities developed by employees; and
  • IV - prevention of conflicts between commercial/business interests and money laundering and terrorist financing prevention mechanisms.
  • § 2. The provisions of § 1 of this article do not apply to legal persons classified under the Unified Special Regime for Collection of Taxes and Contributions due by Microenterprises and Small Businesses – SIMPLES NACIONAL.
  • Article 3. The persons referred to in Article 1 must assess the existence of suspicion in proposals and/or operations of their clients, paying special attention to those that, due to their characteristics regarding involved parties, values, manner of execution, complexity, atypicality, instruments used, or lack of economic or legal basis, may constitute an indication of a crime.
  • Article 4. The persons referred to in Article 1 must maintain a registry of their clients, third-party interveners, and other parties involved in the operations they carry out, including representatives and attorneys, regarding whom the following must appear, at a minimum:
  • II – information allowing assessment of their economic and financial capacities;
  • III – the risk category in which they were classified; and
  • IV – the records and analyses referred to in Articles 5, 6, and 11, as well as the correspondence referred to in Article 12.
  • Article 5. The elements contained in the registry must adhere to differentiated levels of detail, proportional to the risk categories in which the client, third-party interveners, and other parties are classified.
  • § 1. In high-risk categories or situations designated by an act of the President of COAF, it is required to:
  • I - adopt additional diligence to obtain and confirm registry information; and
  • II – initiate, continue, or conclude the operation or client relationship only after explicit authorization recorded by the Board of Directors.
  • § 2. The registry must be subject to periodic updates, without prejudice to contextual updates that may be necessary, to ensure constant reliability of information.
  • § 3. The persons referred to in Article 1 must adopt additional verification procedures whenever there is doubt regarding the reliability of information contained in the registry or when there is suspicion of the practice of crimes provided for in Law No. 9,613, of 3.3.1998.
  • Article 6. With the objective of identifying the ultimate beneficial owner of the operations they carry out, the persons referred to in Article 1 must adopt adequate measures to understand the shareholding composition and control structure of corporate clients.
  • When it is not possible to identify the ultimate beneficial owner, the persons referred to in Article 1 must pay special attention to the operation, evaluating the convenience of carrying it out or establishing the business relationship.
  • Article 7. The persons referred to in Article 1 must maintain a record of all operations they carry out, which must include:
  • I – identification of clients, third-party interveners, and other parties involved; and
  • II – values, dates, and payment methods and forms involved.
  • I – considered suspicious due to: a) the parties, third-party interveners, and other parties involved;
  • I – considered suspicious due to: b) the values, manner of execution, and payment methods and forms;
  • I – considered suspicious due to: c) the lack of economic or legal basis; or
  • I – considered suspicious due to: d) obstacles to accessing relevant information caused by the client, third-party interveners, or other parties involved; or
  • I – considered suspicious due to: II - defined as requiring automatic communication in an act of the President of COAF.
  • The procedures for determining suspicion must be recurrent, including, when necessary, the performance of other diligences beyond those expressly provided for in this Resolution and in acts of the President of COAF.
  • Article 9. If no operations or proposals referred to in Article 8 are identified during the civil year, the persons referred to in Article 1 must declare such fact to COAF by January 31 of the following year.
  • Information provided to COAF will be protected by confidentiality.
  • Article 11. The persons referred to in Article 1 must maintain a reasoned record of decisions to proceed or not with the communications provided for in Article 8, as well as the analyses referred to in Article 3.
  • Article 12. The persons referred to in Article 1 must preserve the registries and records referred to in Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of this Resolution, as well as printed and electronic correspondence regarding the execution of operations, for at least 5 (five) years, counted: I - from the termination of the contractual relationship with the client, for registries; and
  • Article 13. The use of registry information and risk analyses existing in databases of public or private entities does not replace or supplement the requirements provided for in Articles 4, 5, 6, and 7, admitting its use, on a complementary basis, to confirm data and information previously collected.
  • Article 14. The persons referred to in Article 1 must register with COAF, via an electronic form available at http://www.coaf.fazenda.gov.br, keeping their registry constantly updated.
  • In issuing instructions, the President of COAF may, considering the specificities of the obligated sectors, exempt them from compliance with obligations established in this Resolution that are incompatible with the type of operation they carry out.
Not carried over (8)
  • Art. 1° With the objective of preventing and combating the crimes of "money laundering" or concealment of assets, rights, and values, as established in Law No. 9,613, of March 3, 1998, regulated by Decree No. 2,799, of October 8, 1998, entities that carry out, directly or indirectly, the distribution of money or any movable or immovable assets by lottery or similar method shall observe the provis…
  • Art. 2° The entities mentioned in art. 1° shall identify all prize winners and maintain a record of any delivery and/or payment of a prize with a value equal to or greater than R$ 10,000.00 (ten thousand reais).
  • Art. 3º The record must include the type of prize, the description of the asset, the value, the date of delivery and/or payment, and, at a minimum, the following information about the prize winner: I - name;
  • Art. 3º The record must include the type of prize, the description of the asset, the value, the date of delivery and/or payment, and, at a minimum, the following information about the prize winner: II - identification document number and name of the issuing authority or passport or civil ID data, if foreign; and
  • Art. 3º The record must include the type of prize, the description of the asset, the value, the date of delivery and/or payment, and, at a minimum, the following information about the prize winner: III - registration number in the Individual Taxpayer Registry - CPF.
  • Art. 4º The entities mentioned in art. 1° shall pay special attention to prizes or distributions that, according to the Annex of this Resolution, may constitute indications of the crimes provided for in Law No. 9,613, of 1998, or related to them.
  • Art. 9º The entities mentioned in art. 1° shall comply, at any time, with information requests made by COAF regarding winners, types of games, and prizes.
  • Art. 10. The entities mentioned in art. 1° shall indicate to COAF, prior to the start of the effects of this Resolution, the name and qualification of the person responsible for compliance with the obligations hereby established.

“Not carried over” means the sentence has no counterpart in this text; the rule can still be in force in another text.

Similar documents from other regulators

More like this from COAF

We email you every new COAF publication the day it's published.

Source: Conselho de Controle de Atividades Financeiras — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works

In RegAlert: added · updated