Rule · OJK · 23 Feb 2016 · 2/SEOJK.05/2016
The Financial Services Authority mandates that Sharia financing companies and Sharia business units maintain a minimum capital ratio of 10% and keep the ratio of problematic productive assets net of provisions at no more than 5% of total productive assets. The regulation defines adjusted capital and asset calculations, classifies asset quality based on payment delays ranging from 30 to over 180 days, and establishes specific valuation discounts for collateral types based on appraisal recency. It further details the criteria for consumer credit assessment, collateral eligibility, and the reclassification of assets following restructuring.
To:
COPY
CIRCULAR LETTER OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY NUMBER 2 /SEOJK.05/2016
CONCERNING
FINANCIAL HEALTH LEVEL OF SHARIA FINANCING
In accordance with the mandate of Article 20 paragraph (4), Article 23 paragraph (7), Article 26 paragraph (6), Article 28 paragraph (3), and Article 29 paragraph (2) of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 31/POJK.05/2014 concerning the Conduct of Sharia Financing Business (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2014 Number 366, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5640), it is necessary to regulate implementation provisions regarding the financial health level for Sharia financing companies and Sharia business units in this Financial Services Authority Circular as follows:
I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sharia Company means a Sharia financing company and a Sharia business unit.
Financing Company means a business entity that conducts financing activities for the procurement of goods and/or services.
Sharia Financing Company means a Financing Company whose entire business activities conduct Sharia financing.
Sharia Business Unit, hereinafter abbreviated as UUS, is a work unit of the head office of a Financing Company that functions as the head office of offices conducting Sharia financing.
Sharia Financing is the disbursement of financing conducted based on Sharia principles.
Sharia Principle means Islamic law provisions based on fatwas and/or Sharia conformity statements from the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulama Council.
Productive Assets means all assets owned by the Sharia Company with the intention of obtaining income in the form of Sharia Financing.
Financial Health Level of Sharia Financing is the result of assessing the capital adequacy, liquidity, quality of Productive Assets, and financial performance of the Sharia Company.
Financial Services Authority, hereinafter abbreviated as OJK, is an independent institution as referred to in the law concerning the Financial Services Authority.
II. ASSESSMENT OF FINANCIAL HEALTH LEVEL
III. PROCEDURE FOR CALCULATING CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO
Example:
b. for Sharia Financing Companies in the form of a cooperative legal entity, the sum of principal savings, mandatory savings, reserve funds, grants, and undistributed surplus.
c. for UUS, the sum of:
1) adjusted equity consisting of:
a) working capital; b) retained earnings/losses; c) 50% (fifty percent) of current year profit/loss after tax; and d) other equity components, which is the sum of:
(1) changes in revaluation surplus;
(2) exchange differences due to translation of financial statements in foreign currency; (3) gains and/or losses from re-measurement of available-for-sale financial assets; (4) effective portion of gains and losses of hedging financial instruments in cash flow hedges; and (5) other equity components in accordance with financial accounting standards principles, with taking into account deduction factors consisting of:
a) deferred tax calculation; and b) other intangible assets;
2) subordinated qardh loans of 50% (fifty percent) meeting the following criteria:
a) with a term of at least 5 (five) years; b) in the event of liquidation, the claim right applies last among all existing loans; and c) stipulated in the form of a notarial deed agreement between the UUS and the lender, with an amount of at most 50% (fifty percent) of the working capital of the relevant UUS.
Example:
IV. QUALITY OF PRODUCTIVE ASSETS
1) independent assessment or sales transaction is conducted more than 12 (twelve) months but has not exceeded 24 (twenty-four) months; or
2) internal assessment is conducted more than 6 (six) months but has not exceeded 12 (twelve) months;
c. 60% (sixty percent) of the independent assessment value, internal assessment value, or sales transaction value, if:
1) independent assessment or sales transaction is conducted more than 24 (twenty-four) months but has not exceeded 36 (thirty-six) months; or
2) internal assessment is conducted more than 12 (twelve) months but has not exceeded 18 (eighteen) months;
d. 40% (forty percent) of the independent assessment value, internal assessment value, or sales transaction value, if:
1) independent assessment or sales transaction is conducted more than 36 (thirty-six) months but has not exceeded 48 (forty-eight) months; or
2) internal assessment is conducted more than 18 (eighteen) months but has not exceeded 24 (twenty-four) months;
e. 20% (twenty percent) of the independent assessment value, internal assessment value, or sales transaction value, if:
1) independent assessment or sales transaction is conducted more than 48 (forty-eight) months but has not exceeded 60 (sixty) months; or
2) internal assessment is conducted more than 24 (twenty-four) months but has not exceeded 30 (thirty) months;
f. 0% (zero percent) of the independent assessment value, internal assessment value, or sales transaction value, if:
1) independent assessment or sales transaction is conducted more than 60 (sixty) months; or
2) internal assessment is conducted more than 30 (thirty) months;
28. For Productive Assets with a value of Rp3,000,000,000.00 (three billion rupiah) or more and having collateral as referred to in item 26 letter g or being the value of ijarah muntahiya bitamlik objects where waad (option right) has been executed as referred to in item 27, the assessment of the collateral or ijarah muntahiya bitamlik object where waad (option right) has been executed, which will be used as a reduction in the calculation of the provision for impairment of Productive Assets, must be conducted by an independent appraiser. In the event that there is no independent assessment, the Sharia Company may use the sales transaction value as the basis for collateral assessment by observing the provisions as referred to in item 26 letter g and item 27.
29. For Productive Assets with a value of less than Rp3,000,000,000.00 (three billion rupiah) and having collateral as referred to in item 26 letter g or being the value of ijarah muntahiya bitamlik objects where waad (option right) has been executed as referred to in item 27, the assessment of the collateral to be used as a reduction in the calculation of the provision for impairment of Productive Assets may be conducted by an independent appraiser or internal assessment. In the event that there is no independent assessment or internal assessment, the Sharia Company may use the sales transaction value as the basis for assessment by observing the provisions as referred to in item 26 letter g and item 27.
30. In order to calculate collateral, the Sharia Company must have and implement guidelines for determining the basis for assessment or collateral or the value of ijarah muntahiya bitamlik objects where waad (option right) has been executed as referred to in items 26 and 27.
31. The Sharia Company must re-assess the calculation of the provision for impairment of Productive Assets at least every 6 (six) months for the positions of June and December.
32. The OJK has the authority to recalculate the value of collateral that has been deducted or matters that can reduce the provision in the calculation of the provision for impairment of Productive Assets.
33. The Sharia Company must notify consumers regarding the return of collateral or documents related to collateral no later than 1 (one) month from the date of settlement of Sharia Financing.
Based on the regulations, the basis for collateral assessment used in the provision calculation is 40% of the collateral value (i.e., the acquisition price) because the calculation date is 40 months from the date of the goods acquisition transaction. The collateral value that can be recognized as a reduction in provision is Rp100,000,000.00 x 40% = Rp40,000,000.00. However, because the Productive Asset balance is larger than the collateral value, the collateral value that can be considered is maximally only equal to the Productive Asset balance, which is Rp30,000,000.00. Thus, the provision for impairment of Productive Assets is (provision amount based on Productive Asset quality) x (Productive Asset balance that can be considered) = 100% x (Rp30,000,000.00 - Rp30,000,000.00) = Rp0.00.
V. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ON PROFITABILITY FACTORS
Assessment of the Sharia Company's ability to generate profit consists of several ratios, namely:
a. Return on Asset
A ratio used to measure the Sharia Company's ability to generate profit from assets used to support the Sharia Company's operations and capital. b. Return on Equity A ratio used to measure the Sharia Company's ability to generate profit from equity, for Sharia Financing Companies, or working capital of Sharia business units, for UUS.
c. Operating Expenses to Operating Income
A ratio used to measure the Sharia Company's ability to measure the level of efficiency and the Sharia Company's ability to carry out its operational activities. d. Net Sharia Financing Income A ratio used to measure the Sharia Company's ability to manage Productive Assets to generate net operating income.
The calculation of profitability ratios is established as follows:
a. Return on Asset
1) Return on Asset is calculated from the comparison between profit or loss before tax against total assets.
2) For the calculation of profit or loss before tax, an annualized calculation is used. As an example, for the March report position, the calculation method is as follows:
(profit or loss before tax per March position / 3) x 12.
3) Profit or loss before tax per the reporting month position is calculated based on the total income minus total expenses before deducting the estimated income tax.
4) For the calculation of total assets, the average assets throughout the year are used. As an example, for the March report position, the calculation method is as follows:
(Sum of total assets from January to March) / 3. b. Return on Equity
1) Return on Equity is calculated from the comparison of Net Profit against equity.
2) For the calculation of net profit or loss, an annualized calculation is used. As an example, for the March report position, the calculation method is as follows:
(net profit or loss per March position / 3) x 12.
3) Net profit or loss per the reporting month position is calculated based on total income minus total expenses after deducting the estimated income tax.
4) For the calculation of total equity, the average equity throughout the year is used. As an example, for the March report position, the calculation method is as follows:
(sum of total equity from January to March) / 3.
c. Operating Expenses to Operating Income
1) Operating Expenses to Operating Income is calculated from the comparison of operating expenses against the Sharia Company's operating income.
2) The detail of operating income and operating expense accounts in the calculation of the operating expenses to operating income ratio refers to the OJK Circular regarding monthly reports of Financing Companies.
3) In order to maintain the efficiency of Sharia Company management, particularly related to financing acquisition, incentive costs that can be provided by the Sharia Company to third parties are limited based on a certain percentage of the income to be received related to financing. Income to be received related to financing consists of:
a) profit sharing/margin/service fee income before considering cost of fund; b) insurance income; c) administrative income; and d) commission income.
4) Third-party incentive expenditures related to financing acquisition per financing agreement are limited to 15% (fifteen percent) of the value of income related to financing, including third-party income tax within it.
5) Total third-party incentive expenditures related to financing acquisition are limited to 20% (twenty percent) of the value of income related to financing, including third-party income tax within it.
6) Third-party incentive costs related to financing acquisition include all types of payments to third parties or third-party employees, including commissions, incentives, third-party travel costs, joint promotion costs with third parties, for example, costs for purchasing additional motor vehicle accessories, costs for vehicle delivery promotion, and other expenditures related to financing acquisition paid to third parties.
7) Example of incentive cost limitation based on Sharia Financing disbursement per financing agreement, as regulated in item 5), namely:
a) PT ABC Finance Syariah disburses motor vehicle financing to a consumer in one financing agreement with a price of Rp100,000,000.00. b) Through the financing disbursement, PT ABC Finance Syariah receives income as follows:
(1) margin income of Rp43,000,000.00;
(2) insurance discount of Rp15,000,000.00;
(3) administrative income of Rp1,000,000.00; and (4) commission income of Rp1,000,000.00. c) Thus, the third-party incentive costs related to the acquisition of Sharia Financing that can be provided for the disbursement of financing to the consumer are = (15% x (Rp43,000,000.00 + Rp15,000,000.00 + Rp1,000,000.00 + Rp1,000,000.00)) = Rp9,000,000.00. d) The total incentive costs have considered commissions, incentives, third-party income tax, and other expenditures related to financing acquisition paid to third parties.
8) Example of incentive cost limitation based on total as regulated in item 6), namely:
a) Based on the Monthly Report of the Sharia Financing Company for January 2016, PT ABC Finance Syariah has a profit and loss statement structure with details including the following:
(1) margin income of Rp80,000,000.00;
(2) insurance discount of Rp20,000,000.00;
(3) administrative income of Rp10,000,000.00; and (4) commission income of Rp10,000,000.00.
b) Thus, the total third-party incentive costs related to the acquisition of Sharia Financing that can be provided are = 20% x (Rp80,000,000.00 + Rp20,000,000.00 + Rp10,000,000.00 + Rp10,000,000.00) = Rp24,000,000.00. c) The total incentive costs have considered commissions, incentives, third-party income tax, third-party travel costs, joint promotion costs with third parties, and other expenditures related to financing acquisition paid to third parties. d. Net Sharia Financing Income
1) Net Sharia Financing Income is obtained from the comparison of operating income derived from Sharia Financing including margin, investment results/profit sharing, and/or service fees (ujrah) against the average Productive Assets. Income from Sharia Financing is obtained after being reduced by expenses from the Sharia Company's funding activities.
2) For the calculation of operating income derived from Sharia Financing including margin, investment results/profit sharing, and/or service fees (ujrah), an annualized calculation is used. As an example, for the March report position, the calculation method is as follows:
(Operating Income per March position / 3) x 12.
3) For the calculation of funding acquisition expenses, an annualized calculation is used. As an example, for the March report position, the calculation method is as follows:
(Funding acquisition expenses per March position / 3) x 12.
4) For the calculation of total Productive Assets, the average Productive Assets throughout the year are used. As an example, for the March report position, the calculation method is as follows:
(Sum of total Productive Assets from January to March) / 3.
4) Value 4 if the Sharia Company has an operating expenses to operating income ratio of 90% (ninety percent) or more.
d. Assessment of the net Sharia financing income ratio factor is as follows:
1) Value 1 if the Sharia Company has a net Sharia financing income ratio of 6% (six percent) or more.
2) Value 2 if the Sharia Company has a net Sharia financing income ratio from 4% (four percent) to less than 6% (six percent).
3) Value 3 if the Sharia Company has a net Sharia financing income ratio from 2% (two percent) to less than 4% (four percent).
4) Value 4 if the Sharia Company has a net Sharia financing income ratio less than 2% (two percent).
4. The Sharia Company is required to meet the profitability ratio with a composite value no higher than 2.5 (two point five). The composite value is calculated using the weighted average method of 4 profitability ratios with a weight of 25% (twenty-five percent) each.
5. The measurement of the profitability factor is documented according to the worksheet format as contained in Format 3 of Appendix II, which is an integral part of this OJK Circular.
VI. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT ON LIQUIDITY
1. Assessment of the level of matching between current assets and current liabilities is established as:
a. Current Ratio
A ratio used to assess the Sharia Company's ability to settle its short-term obligations. The higher the current ratio, the higher the Sharia Company's ability to settle its short-term obligations.
b. Cash Ratio
A ratio used to assess the Sharia Company's ability to pay obligations from cash and securities. The higher the cash ratio, the higher the Sharia Company's ability to pay obligations from cash and securities. The Sharia Company's securities components include checks, giro slips, and promissory notes.
2. The calculation of liquidity ratios is established as follows:
a. Current Ratio
1) Current ratio is calculated from the value of current assets divided by the value of current liabilities.
2) The Sharia Company's current assets consist of cash and cash equivalents, banks, derivative receivables, short-term investments in securities, Productive Assets less than one year, prepaid expenses, and other assets that can be liquidated with a maturity of less than one year.
3) Current liabilities consist of obligations that can be paid immediately, derivative obligations, tax payables, funding that will mature in less than 1 year, and other liabilities that will mature in less than 1 year.
b. Cash Ratio
Cash ratio is calculated from the value of cash plus securities divided by current liabilities. The method of calculating current liabilities is the same as the method of calculating current liabilities in the current ratio.
3. Assessment of the liquidity factor is implemented with the following provisions:
a. Assessment of the current ratio is as follows:
1) Value 1 if the Sharia Company has a current ratio of 150% (one hundred fifty percent) or more.
2) Value 2 if the Sharia Company has a current ratio from 125% (one hundred twenty-five percent) to less than 150% (one hundred fifty percent).
3) Value 3 if the Sharia Company has a current ratio from 100% (one hundred percent) to less than 125% (one hundred twenty-five percent).
4) Value 4 if the Sharia Company has a current ratio of less than 100% (one hundred percent).
b. Assessment of the cash ratio is as follows:
1) Value 1 if the Sharia Company has a cash ratio of 3% (three percent) or more.
2) Value 2 if the Sharia Company has a cash ratio from 2% (one percent) to less than 3% (three percent).
3) Value 3 if the Sharia Company has a cash ratio from 1% (one percent) to less than 2% (two percent).
4) Value 4 if the Sharia Company has a cash ratio from 0% (zero percent) to less than 1% (one percent).
4. The Sharia Company is required to meet the liquidity ratio with a composite value no higher than 2.5 (two point five). The composite value is calculated using the weighted average method of the value of each liquidity ratio with a weight of 50% (fifty percent) each.
5. The measurement of the liquidity factor is documented according to the worksheet format as contained in Format 4 of Appendix III, which is an integral part of this OJK Circular.
VII. VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION BY OJK
1. OJK may conduct verification and validation of the truthfulness and fairness of data that serves as the basis for calculating the factors measuring the Financial Health Level of Sharia Financing prepared by the Sharia Company.
2. In the event that there is a difference between the Financial Health Level of Sharia Financing prepared by the Sharia Company and the Financial Health Level of Sharia Financing resulting from OJK's verification and validation, the Financial Health Level of Sharia Financing established by OJK shall apply.
VII. TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS
Collateral obtained by the Sharia Company before the establishment of this OJK Circular is exempt from the provisions as referred to in Roman numeral IV item 21, item 22, item 23, item 24, and item 25.
VIII. CLOSING
The provisions in this OJK Circular shall take effect on July 1, 2016.
Established in Jakarta on February 23, 2016
EXECUTIVE HEAD OF SUPERVISOR
OF INSURANCE, PENSION FUNDS,
FINANCING INSTITUTIONS, AND
OTHER FINANCIAL SERVICE INSTITUTIONS
FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, sign
FIRDAUS DJAELANI
Copy in accordance with the original
Legal Director 1
Legal Department sign
Yuliana
APPENDIX I
CIRCULAR LETTER OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY NUMBER 2 /SEOJK.05/2016 REGARDING FINANCIAL HEALTH LEVEL OF SHARIA FINANCING
ASSET RISK WEIGHTS
A. SHARIA FINANCING ASSETS
No. Component
Asset Risk Weight
Sharia Financing With
Sharia Guarantee
Asset Risk Weight
Sharia Financing Without
Sharia Guarantee
(1) (2) (3)
Sales Financing in the
Performing and Special Mention Categories
For Productive Sector Purposes*) a. Murabahah 15% 30% b. Salam 15% 30%
c. Istishna 15% 30%
d. Other Sales Financing 15% 30%
Sales Financing in the
Performing and Special Mention Categories
For Consumer Purposes a. Murabahah 25% 50% b. Salam 25% 50%
c. Istishna 25% 50%
d. Other Sales Financing 25% 50%
Investment Financing in the
Performing and Special Mention Categories a. Mudharabah 15% 30% b. Musyarakah 15% 30%
c. Mudharabah Musytarakah 15% 30%
d. Musyarakah Mutanaqishoh 15% 30% e. Other Investment Financing 15% 30%
Service Financing in the
Performing and Special Mention Categories a. IMBT 15% 30% b. Ijarah 25% 50%
c. Qardh 25% 50%
d. Other Service Financing 25% 50%
Other Financing in the
Performing and Special Mention Categories
25% 50%
Overdue Financing
a. Less Smooth 50% 100% b. Doubtful 62.5% 125%
c. Deteriorated 75% 150%
*) The productive sector refers to activities aimed at producing goods or services that add value and increase income, evidenced by supporting documents.
B. NON-SHARIA FINANCING ASSETS
| No. | Component | Risk Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Cash and Cash Equivalents | 0% |
| 2. | Short-Term Investments in Securities | 75% |
| 3. | Equity Participation | |
| a. | Banks | 50% |
| b. | Other Financial Service Companies | 75% |
| c. | Other Companies | 100% |
| 4. | Other Assets | 100% |
Established in Jakarta on 23 February 2016
EXECUTIVE HEAD OF SUPERVISION OF
INSURANCE, PENSION FUNDS,
FINANCING INSTITUTIONS, AND
OTHER FINANCIAL SERVICE INSTITUTIONS
FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, signed
FIRDAUS DJAELANI
A copy consistent with the original
Director of Legal Affairs 1
Legal Department signed
Yuliana
APPENDIX II
CIRCULAR LETTER OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY NUMBER 2 /SEOJK.05/2016 CONCERNING THE FINANCIAL HEALTH LEVEL OF SHARIA FINANCING
I. SHARIA FINANCING ASSETS
| No. | Sharia Financing Asset Value | Adjusted Asset Risk Weight | Sharia Financing Asset Value | Adjusted Asset Risk Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Sales and Purchase Financing in the Smooth and Special Attention Categories for Productive Sector Purposes | ||||
| a. | Murabahah | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| b. | Salam | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| c. | Istishna | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| d. | Other Sales and Purchase Financing | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| 2. | Sales and Purchase Financing in the Smooth and Special Attention Categories for Consumer Purposes | ||||
| a. | Murabahah | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| b. | Salam | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| c. | Istishna | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| d. | Other Sales and Purchase Financing | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| 3. | Investment Financing in the Smooth and Special Attention Categories | ||||
| a. | Mudharabah | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| b. | Musyarakah | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| c. | Mudharabah Musytarakah | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| d. | Musyarakah Mutanaqishoh | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| e. | Other Investment Financing | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| 4. | Service Financing in the Smooth and Special Attention Categories | ||||
| a. | IMBT | 15% | 0 | 30% | 0 |
| b. | Ijarah | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| c. | Qardh | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| d. | Other Service Financing | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| 5. | Other Financing in the Smooth and Special Attention Categories | 25% | 0 | 50% | 0 |
| 6. | Overdue Financing | ||||
| a. | Less Smooth | 50% | 0 | 100% | 0 |
| b. | Doubtful | 62.50% | 0 | 125% | 0 |
| c. | Deteriorated | 75% | 0 | 150% | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
II. NON-SHARIA FINANCING ASSETS
| No. | Component | Non-Sharia Financing Asset Value | Adjusted Asset Risk Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Cash and Cash Equivalents | 0% | 0 |
| 2. | Short-Term Investments in Securities | 75% | 0 |
| 3. | Equity Participation | ||
| a. | Banks | 50% | 0 |
| b. | Other Financial Service Companies | 75% | 0 |
| c. | Other Companies | 100% | 0 |
| 4. | Other Assets | 100% | 0 |
| Total | 0 | 0 |
FORMAT 1
WORKSHEET - CALCULATION OF ADJUSTED ASSETS
| No. | Component | Sharia Financing Assets with Sharia Guarantee | Sharia Financing Assets without Sharia Guarantee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total Adjusted Assets | 0 | 0 |
Data Required:
Adjusted Capital =
Adjusted Assets = IDR 0
Ratio Calculation Formula Result
= Adjusted Capital = IDR 0 =
Adjusted Assets IDR 0
WORKSHEET - MEASUREMENT OF CAPITAL RATIO FACTOR
FORMAT 1
Data Required:
Problematic Productive Assets =
Total Productive Assets =
Ratio Calculation Formula Result
= Problematic Productive Assets = IDR 0 =
Total Productive Assets IDR 0
Productive Asset Quality Ratio
#DIV/0! 1.
WORKSHEET - MEASUREMENT OF PRODUCTIVE ASSET QUALITY FACTOR FORMAT 2
Data Required:
Profit (Loss) Before Tax
Annualized =
Net Profit (Loss) =
Total Assets =
Total Equity =
Operating Expenses =
Operating Income =
Annualized Operating Income =
Annualized Funding Acquisition Costs =
Annualized Total Productive Assets =
| COMPONENT | Calculation Formula | Result | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| = Annualized Profit (Loss) Before Tax | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Total Assets | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Net Profit (Loss) | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Total Equity | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Operating Expenses | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Operating Income | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Annualized Operating Income - Annualized Funding Acquisition Costs | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Annualized Total Productive Assets | = IDR 0 | ||
| Composite Value of Profitability Factor | #DIV/0! | 4. | |
| Net Sharia Financing Income | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |
| --- | --- | --- | |
| 2. Return on Equity | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! | |
| 3. Operating Expenses to Operating Income Ratio | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! |
FORMAT 3
| #DIV/0! | 1. Return on Asset | #DIV/0! |
WORKSHEET - MEASUREMENT OF PROFITABILITY FACTOR
Data Required:
Current Assets =
Current Liabilities =
Cash + Securities =
| COMPONENT | Calculation Formula | Result | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| = Current Assets | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Current Liabilities | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Cash + Securities | = IDR 0 | ||
| = Current Liabilities | = IDR 0 | ||
| Composite Value of Liquidity Factor | #DIV/0! |
Established in Jakarta on 23 February 2016 signed FIRDAUS DJAELANI
FORMAT 4
WORKSHEET - MEASUREMENT OF LIQUIDITY FACTOR
EXECUTIVE HEAD OF SUPERVISION OF
INSURANCE, PENSION FUNDS,
FINANCING INSTITUTIONS, AND
OTHER FINANCIAL SERVICE INSTITUTIONS
FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY,
2. Cash Ratio | #DIV/0! | #DIV/0! |
A copy consistent with the original
Director of Legal Affairs 1
Legal Department signed
Yuliana
APPENDIX III
CIRCULAR LETTER OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY NUMBER 2/SEOJK.05/2016 CONCERNING THE FINANCIAL HEALTH LEVEL OF SHARIA FINANCING
GUIDELINES FOR PRODUCTIVE ASSET QUALITY ASSESSMENT
| Quality | Special | Less Smooth | Doubtful | Deteriorated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Consumer's Payment Ability | |||||
| Availability and accuracy of financial information | • Consumer relationship with Sharia Company is good, consumer always submits financial information regularly and accurately.; • There are up-to-date financial reports and analysis results by the Sharia Company on the financial reports/information submitted by the consumer. | • Consumer relationship with the Sharia Company is quite good and the consumer always submits financial information regularly and is still accurate.; • There are up-to-date financial reports and analysis results by the Sharia Company on the financial reports/information submitted by the consumer. | • Consumer relationship with the Sharia Company is deteriorating and financial information cannot be trusted or there are no analysis results by the Sharia Company on the financial reports/information submitted by the consumer. | • Consumer relationship with the Sharia Company is increasingly deteriorating and financial information is not available or cannot be trusted.; • Consumer relationship with the Sharia Company is very poor and financial information is not available or cannot be trusted. | |
| Completeness of Sharia Financing Documentation | Sharia Financing documentation is complete. | Sharia Financing documentation is complete. | Sharia Financing documentation is less complete. | Sharia Financing documentation is incomplete.; No Sharia Financing exists. | |
| Compliance with Sharia Financing Agreements | No violation of Sharia Financing agreements exists. | Non-principled violation of Sharia Financing agreements. | Violation of main requirements of Sharia Financing agreements that is quite principled. | Principled violation of main requirements in Sharia Financing agreements.; Very principled violation of main requirements in Sharia Financing agreements. | |
| Appropriateness of Fund Usage | • Funds used in accordance with the Sharia Financing application (Sharia Financing usage in accordance with the requested purpose).; • The amount and type of facilities provided are in accordance with needs.; • Sharia Financing extension is in accordance with consumer need analysis. | • Funds used less in accordance with the financing application, but the amount is not material (Sharia Financing usage less in accordance with the requested purpose, but still related).; • The amount and type of facilities provided are larger than needs, but the amount is not material.; • Sharia Financing extension is less in accordance with consumer need analysis. | • Funds used less in accordance with the financing application, with a quite material amount (Sharia Financing usage less in accordance with the requested purpose and not related).; • The amount and type of facilities provided are larger than needs, with a quite material amount.; • Sharia Financing extension is not in accordance with consumer need analysis (extension of financing to hide financial difficulties), with quite material deviations. | • Funds used less in accordance with the financing application, with a material amount (Sharia Financing usage less in accordance with the requested purpose and not related).; • Most fund usage is not in accordance with the financing application (Sharia Financing usage less in accordance with the requested purpose and not related).; • The amount and type of facilities provided are larger than needs, with a very material amount.; • Sharia Financing extension is not in accordance with consumer need analysis (extension of financing to hide financial difficulties), with material deviations.; • Sharia Financing extension without consumer need analysis. | |
| Fairness of Payment Source for Obligations | • Payment source can be clearly identified and agreed upon by the Sharia Company and the consumer.; • Payment source is in accordance with the financing structure/type.; • Repayment scheme is fair (including the provision of grace periods).; • Foreign currency income is sufficient to support the repayment of foreign currency financing. | • Payment source can be identified and agreed upon by the Sharia Company and the consumer.; • Payment source is less in accordance with the financing structure/type to a quite material extent.; • Repayment scheme is quite fair (including the provision of grace periods).; • Foreign currency income is less sufficient to support the repayment of foreign currency financing. | • Payment originates from a source other than the agreed one.; • Payment source is less in accordance with the financing structure/type.; • Payment source is unknown, while the agreed source is no longer possible.; • Repayment scheme is less fair and there is a grace period provision that is not in accordance with the type of Sharia Financing.; • Foreign currency income is not sufficient to support the repayment of foreign currency financing to a quite material extent. | • Payment source is less in accordance with the Sharia Financing structure/type.; • There is no possible payment source.; • Payment source is not in accordance with the Sharia Financing structure/type.; • Repayment scheme is less fair and there is a grace period provision that is not in accordance with the type of Sharia Financing for a quite long period.; • Foreign currency income is not sufficient to support the repayment of foreign currency financing to a material extent.; • Repayment scheme is unfair and there is a grace period provision that is not in accordance with the type of Sharia Financing for a quite long period.; • There is no foreign currency receipt to support the repayment of foreign currency financing. | |
| 2. Financial Performance | |||||
| Consumer Profit Acquisition | • High and stable profit acquisition.; • Profit acquisition is quite good but has the potential to decline. | • Profit acquisition is low.; • Profit is very small or negative.; • Operational losses are financed by asset sales.; • Experiencing significant losses.; • Consumer is unable to meet all obligations and business activities cannot be maintained. | |||
| Capital Structure | • Strong capital structure.; • Capital structure is quite good and the owner has the ability to provide additional capital if needed.; • Debt-to-equity ratio is quite high. | • Debt-to-equity ratio is high.; • Debt-to-equity ratio is very high. | |||
| Cash Flow | • Strong liquidity and working capital.; • Cash flow analysis shows that the consumer can meet payment obligations for principal, margin, investment results/profit sharing, and/or service fees (ujrah) without support from additional funding sources. | • Liquidity and working capital are generally good.; • Cash flow analysis shows that although the consumer can meet payment obligations for principal, margin, investment results/profit sharing, and/or service fees (ujrah), there are indications of certain problems that if not addressed will affect future payments. | • Liquidity is less and working capital is limited.; • Cash flow analysis shows that the consumer can only pay principal and part of the margin, investment results/profit sharing, and/or service fees (ujrah).; • Additional loans/new Sharia Financing are used to meet maturing obligations.; • Additional loans/Sharia Financing are used to meet maturing obligations to a material extent. | • Liquidity is very low.; • Cash flow analysis shows inability to pay principal, margin, investment results/profit sharing, and/or service fees (ujrah).; • Liquidity difficulties.; • Cash flow analysis shows that the consumer is unable to close production costs. | |
| Sensitivity to Market Risk | • The number of portfolios sensitive to changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates is relatively small or has been well hedged. | • Some portfolios are sensitive to changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates but are still controllable.; • Business activities are affected by changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. | • Business activities are threatened due to changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates.; • Business activities are threatened due to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. | ||
| 3. Consumer Business Prospects | |||||
| Business Growth Potential | • Business activities have good growth potential.; • Business activities have limited growth potential. | • Business activities show very limited or no growth potential.; • Business activities are declining.; • Business sustainability is highly doubtful and difficult to recover.; • There is a high probability that business activities will cease. | |||
| Market Conditions and Consumer Position in Competition | • Stable market not influenced by changes in economic conditions.; • Limited competition, including a strong position in the market.; • Good market position, not much influenced by changes in economic conditions.; • Market share is comparable to competitors.; • Operating at optimum capacity. | • Market position is good, not much influenced by changes in economic conditions.; • Market share is comparable to competitors.; • Operating at almost optimum capacity. | • Market is influenced by changes in economic conditions.; • Market position is quite good but there are many competitors, yet can recover if implementing new business strategies.; • Not operating at optimum capacity.; • Capacity is not at a level that can support operations. | • Market is very influenced by changes in economic conditions.; • Business competition is very tight and company operations experience serious problems.; • Losing market share in line with deteriorating economic conditions.; • Operations are not continuous. | |
| Management Quality and Labor Issues | • Very good management.; • Adequate workforce and never recorded to have experienced labor disputes or strikes, or has experienced minor disputes/strikes that were resolved well. | • Good management.; • Workforce is generally adequate, has experienced labor disputes/strikes that were resolved well but there is a possibility of recurrence. | • Management is quite good.; • Workforce is excessive and there are labor disputes/strikes with a quite material impact on consumer business activities. | • Management is less experienced.; • Workforce is excessive in quite a large number, causing unrest and there are labor disputes/strikes with a material impact on consumer business activities.; • Management is very weak.; • Workforce is excessive in a large number, causing unrest and there are labor disputes/strikes with a material impact on consumer business activities. | |
| Support from Group or Affiliates | • Affiliate companies or group are stable and support the business.; • Affiliate companies or group are stable and do not have a burdensome impact on the consumer. | • Relationship with affiliate companies or group begins to have a burdensome impact on the consumer. | • Affiliate companies or group have had a burdensome impact on the consumer.; • Affiliate companies are very detrimental to the consumer. | ||
| Efforts Made by Consumer | • Environmental management efforts to maintain the environment (for large-scale consumers who have an important impact on the environment) are good and achieve results at least in accordance with minimum requirements as regulated in applicable legislation. | • Environmental management efforts are less good and have not reached minimum requirements as regulated in applicable legislation. | • Environmental management efforts are less good and have not reached minimum requirements as regulated in applicable legislation, with quite material deviations.; • The company has not implemented significant environmental management efforts or has implemented efforts but has not reached the requirements as regulated in applicable legislation, with material deviations.; • The company has not implemented significant environmental management efforts or has implemented efforts but has not reached minimum requirements as regulated in applicable legislation, and has the possibility of being sued in court. |
Established in Jakarta on 23 January 2016
EXECUTIVE HEAD OF SUPERVISION OF
INSURANCE, PENSION FUNDS,
FINANCING INSTITUTIONS, AND
OTHER FINANCIAL SERVICE INSTITUTIONS
FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, signed
FIRDAUS DJAELANI
A copy consistent with the original
Director of Legal Affairs 1
Legal Department signed
Yuliana
APPENDIX IV
CIRCULAR LETTER OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY NUMBER 2 /SEOJK.05/2016 CONCERNING THE FINANCIAL HEALTH LEVEL OF SHARIA FINANCING
APPENDIX IV
WORKSHEET FOR PRODUCTIVE ASSET QUALITY ASSESSMENT
| No. | Component | Assessment Condition* | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| I. Consumer's Payment Ability | |||
| 1. | Availability and accuracy of consumer financial information | ||
| 2. | Completeness of Sharia Financing documentation | ||
| 3. | Compliance with Sharia Financing agreements | ||
| 4. | Appropriateness of fund usage | ||
| 5. | Fairness of payment source for obligations | ||
| II. Consumer's Financial Performance | |||
| 1. | Profit acquisition | ||
| 2. | Capital structure | ||
| 3. | Cash flow | ||
| 4. | Sensitivity to market risk | ||
| III. Consumer Business Prospects | |||
| 1. | Business growth potential | ||
| 2. | Market conditions and consumer position in competition | ||
| 3. | Management quality and labor issues | ||
| 4. | Support from group or affiliates | ||
| 5. | Consumer efforts to maintain the environment | ||
| PRODUCTIVE ASSET QUALITY* |
*) Condition is filled based on the actual condition of the Consumer based on the assessment of productive asset quality components based on Appendix II which is an integral part of the OJK Circular. *) Quality is filled with the Consumer's productive asset quality (Smooth/Special Attention/Less Smooth/Doubtful/Deteriorated) for each component by considering the Consumer's condition with reference to Appendix II which is an integral part of the OJK Circular.
*) Productive asset quality is filled with the final result of the productive asset quality assessment for the respective Consumer (Smooth/Special Attention/Less Smooth/Doubtful/Deteriorated) by considering the assessment of productive asset quality for each assessment component.
Established in Jakarta on 23 February 2016
EXECUTIVE HEAD OF SUPERVISION OF
INSURANCE, PENSION FUNDS,
FINANCING INSTITUTIONS, AND
OTHER FINANCIAL SERVICE INSTITUTIONS
FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY, signed
FIRDAUS DJAELANI
A copy consistent with the original
Director of Legal Affairs 1
Legal Department signed
Yuliana
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
More like this from OJK
We email you every new OJK publication the day it's published.
Source: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Financial Services Authority) — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
In RegAlert: added · updated