VIS Credit Rating Company Limited Project Grading Methodology

VIS Project Grading
MAY 2025
Credit Rating Company Limited
1
VIS
Credit Rating Company Limited
PROJECT GRADING vis.com.pk VIS Credit Rating Company Limited

2
VIS
Credit Rating Company Limited
Project Grading
JUNE 2026
Table of Contents
SUMMARY OF CRITERIA CHANGES……………………………………………………………………………………………………..3
INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................3
SPONSORS .........................................................................................................................................3
PRE-COMPLETION RISK .....................................................................................................................3
OPERATION RISK...............................................................................................................................4
OFF-TAKE RISK ..................................................................................................................................4
STRUCTURE........................................................................................................................................5
ESG....................................................................................................................................................6
RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS ...........................................................................................................6

VIS
Credit Rating Company Limited
Project Grading
JUNE 2026
SUMMARY OF CRITERIA CHANGES
Project Grading methodology dated May 2025 has been reviewed and the fundamental criteria as outlined in the aforesaid methodology remain the same. INTRODUCTION Completion of infrastructural, industrial, commercial or residentials projects play a pivotal role in the economic development of any country and hence represents a long-term investment and commitment by the investors to the economy. In fact, the performance of construction industry is one of the key indicators used in many developed countries to monitor the state of the economy. The construction industry is a major end consumer for several capital-intensive industries such as steel and cement and for smaller industries such as paints, pipes, wiring etc. Thus, a robust construction industry spurs economic activity in a large number of upstream industries, therefore attracting investment in these sectors and creating employment. The construction activity by itself is highly labor intensive, requiring large number of skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled personnel. In view of the above factors, it is not surprising that investment in construction projects, either directly by the government itself or through encouragement of private sector activity (or even a combination of both), has been a popular tool for governments to boost economic activity. In recent years, demand for the infrastructural development, industrial, commercial & residential projects have experienced significant growth in the emerging markets whereas banks and capital market financing have been a popular mode of funding for these projects. These projects are financed through a combination of equity and debt. Various structures including Build-Own-Operate-Transfer, Build-Lease-Transfer and Build-Own-Operate have facilitated execution of such projects in markets throughout the World. Primarily, mega projects are usually initiated by governments that in recent years have turned into public-private partnerships. In any case, the onus of arranging for major funding falls on respective governments. It is important that these projects should have strong economics as the environment in which they operate can be un-tested or uncertain. VIS generally breaks down the Project Grading analysis into the following areas: Sponsors, Pre-Completion Risk, Operations Risk, Off-Take, and Structural Aspects. SPONSORS The quality of sponsors is an important factor in assessing the potential success of a project. Prior experience of sponsors in related projects and their completion ratio is taken into consideration. VIS looks for evidence of sponsor’s commitment to the project that can be gauged from the level of equity participation, time invested and project’s strategic importance to sponsors. Moreover, financial strength of sponsors is determined to ensure that future obligations such as contingent equity requirements are met. Ability to arrange mezzanine financing becomes particularly important in case of cost over￾runs. In case a sponsoris
weak, guarantee from a stronger entity can be considered. PRE-COMPLETION RISK Pre-completion risk or construction risk is the risk that the project is not completed on time, within budget, and/or up to the required performance standards. There are multiple factors that test the project’s resilience to pre-completion risks. VIS analyses all contractors for performance history, prior experience and financial strength. Generally, contractors having local experience are preferred for their familiarity with business and political environment. The risk that construction cost may exceed budget is also taken into account while analyzing pre-completion risks. The terms of the contract and construction budget is examined for realistic estimates and the ability of the project to pass on cost overruns to the contractor.

VIS
Credit Rating Company Limited
Project Grading
JUNE 2026
VIS also considers factors that may prolong scheduled completion of the project. The longer the project, the more it is exposed to delay risks. Construction contract is reviewed for terms that may insulate the project from potential stoppages. Adequate penalty payments for not meeting the targeted performance or bonus payments for exceeding targets, if part of the contract, may be considered positively. OPERATION RISK The operations risk is the risk that the project will suffer a loss in productivity/output and may not meet the expected performance standards due to outages or ultimately incur greater costs than projected. Either of these will eventually alter the project’s ability to generate projected cash flows. VIS examines the likelihood of such events and the consequences if they do occur. The analysis of operation risk revolves around the ability and financial health of the operator, the cost structure, technology risk and the supply risk. The ability and capacity of the operator to operate efficiently and effectively is seen through demonstrated performance in similar projects. Ideally, the operator should have prior experience in the country or the region. The motivation for the operator to run a project is linked to monetary benefit, future potential for getting similar projects and various bonuses/penalties for achieving/missing performance targets. The project should have strong contractual agreements with the operator to provide protection against adverse situations. The financial strength of the operator and its capacity to continue with the project across the life of debt issue is also evaluated. In some cases, the operator may be a sponsor that may entail added incentive to operate the project in an efficient manner. The operating and maintenance contract normally provides for dispute resolution. The agreement is seen for recourse option in case any dispute arises. VIS reviews the volatility in operating cost. Operating cost varies by project and has major components such as labor, fuel, insurance, power and maintenance. A strong project has a pass￾through cost component so that any variation in projected cash flows is covered through tariff adjustments. Similarly, technology risk is important in the pre-completion and post completion stages. The risk that the project will not perform up to the required standards is greater in technology intensive projects such as power plants. Projects where proven technology is used as compared to a relatively new one, this risk in minimized. Past performance of the technology used is reviewed, though VIS understands that historical performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance as substandard maintenance and repairs may have negative implications. A feasibility report from independent experts can clarify the expected outages, potential efficiency levels and possible environmental issues. Some projects require that a resource or product exists or be available for the project to
operate. This resource or product can take many different forms. In projects that involve extraction of a resource or commodity, an assessment of supply risk will involve determination of the sufficiency of reserves or the cost of extracting them. In case of a power plant that needs to be operated on let’s say gas, fuel supply is necessary to produce electricity. In such a scenario, supply in adequate quantities and at predetermined price is essential for smooth operations. Normally, long-term contracts are preferred with suppliers at fixed prices over the period of the debt issue. If the purchase agreement incorporates a pass￾through cost element, then fixing of price may not be a priority. The supplier is seen for its ability to provide continuous supply as long as the debt issue remains outstanding. The credit quality of the supplier, the source of supply and backup alternatives are important factors in assessing supply risk. OFF-TAKE RISK Off-take risk is the risk that demand for output or service does not exist at the agreed price or the off-taker is unable or refuses to honor its commitment to purchase. The project should have the ability to generate sufficient cash flows to meet operating expenses and service its debt. For this reason, the economics of the project are very important, especially

VIS
Credit Rating Company Limited
Project Grading
JUNE 2026 in emerging markets where the enforceability of contract may be unreliable due to less developed legal system. The focus is on market risk that there may not be enough demand at a given price necessary to generate adequate cash flows. In analyzing the potential variability, demand forecasts are seen in the light of underlying assumptions and duly stressed in cash flow modeling. VIS differentiates between multiuser and single or few user projects. Multiuser projects can be toll roads while single or few users are common in power projects. In single or few user projects, the purchase agreement is important, which is generally a take-or-pay contract. The price mechanism of the off-take agreement is evaluated for its adequacy in covering fixed costs, operating expenses and debt servicing requirements. A variable cost structure in a project that stipulates adverse developments in input costs to be passed on to the off taker is viewed positively. The pricing at the same time should be economical so that the off-taker is willing and able to pay for the output. The financial strength of the off-taker is also important with respect to its ability to buy. The purchase price usually varies with the quality of output. For example, the quality of mineral in a mining project will determine the off-take price or efficiency levels in a power plant may affect tariff. These risks are identified and assessed. The purchase contract is also reviewed for the quantity of output to be purchased. There may be seasonal variability in demand of the output which will have direct impact on the cash flows. Stronger projects would have full capacity booked through the purchase agreement. Generally, the contract has penalty or bonus provisions for meeting performance standards. This can be payable by either party involved in the project. Penalty payments by the off-taker/supplier for not meeting the commitment would compensate for the loss in cash flows. STRUCTURE Many of the risks associated with project financing are minimized by allocating them to different participants. However, a tranche of debt may need to have greater risk mitigation when receiving a rating. VIS reviews debt structuring by focusing on the cash flows mechanics, capital structure and legal issues. It is important that a project maintains strong cash flows throughout the life of the debt issue. Typically, cash flows are linked to tariff based on market price that may experience volatility. Tariffs that represent a good matching of revenues to expenses will expose the project to less volatility. It is possible that some projects entail longer gestation period before cash flows can be generated; in such a scenario it is essential that maturity of debt is accordingly negotiated and principal repayments are matched with the cash flows of the project. The project may face liquidity crisis due to unexpected interruptions in operations amid labor strikes, technical difficulties or force majeure. These
extraordinary situations call for extra protection through covenants such as maintaining a certain debt coverage ratio, building an operating reserve account or restrictions on payments to shareholders. Insurance can be used to mitigate force majeure risks. VIS would expect an independent expert to comment on the adequacy of insurance coverage. Apart from cash flows, it is equally important that the project has a balanced debt to equity mix as it has an influence on the debt servicing coverage and manifests sponsor’s commitment to the project. Generally, greater the risk, higher the equity that is required. The timing of equity infusion and backup commitment vary by project. In some cases, VIS may require sponsors to maintain a certain minimum level of equity or may consider subordinated debt equivalent to equity. Project financing faces legal issues. The predictability of legal system, enforceability of collateral and the enforcement of project’s agreements are key concerns. The opinion of the legal counsel holds substantial weight in addressing these issues.

VIS
Credit Rating Company Limited
Project Grading
JUNE 2026
Managing currency risk exposure is critical to projects that generate revenues in one currency but have debt obligations in another currency. Susceptibility to exchange rate volatility can affect cash flows and debt servicing abilities of the project, especially if appropriate hedging mechanisms are not in place. VIS assesses any adverse volatilities in currency movement that might negatively affect the ability of the project to meet its debt obligations. ESG Environmental factors—such as emissions, energy use, pollution, and climate resilience—along with social aspects like labor standards, community impact, human rights, and health and safety practices, and governance elements including transparency, board oversight, and ethical conduct, are all key considerations integrated into a project grading framework. ESG integration should be embedded across the entire project lifecycle—from initial screening and due diligence to ongoing monitoring and post-implementation review—to support long-term sustainability and manage risks effectively. RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS Rating scale and Definitions may be accessed at (https://docs.vis.com.pk/docs/VISRatingScales.pdf)

VIS
Credit Rating Company Limited
Project Grading
JUNE 2026
Islamic International Rating Agency – Bahrain – iira.com Credit Rating Information & Services Ltd. – Bangladesh – crislbd.com Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. - Japan China Chengxin International Credit Rating Company Limited - China VIS Credit Rating Company Ltd. 128/C, 25th Lane off Khayaban-e-Ittehad, Phase VII, DHA, Karachi Tel: (92-21) 35311861-64 431, Block-Q, Commercial Area, Phase-II, D.H.A. Lahore - Cantt. Tel: (92-42) 35723411-13 www.vis.com.pk info@vis.com.pk DISCLAIMER Information herein was obtained from sources believed to be accurate and reliable; however, VIS does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. Rating is an opinion on credit quality only and is not a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Copyright VIS Credit Rating Company Limited. All rights reserved. Contents may be used by news media with credit to VIS.