2018-04-13
Added · Updated
Market operators and data reporting services providers must implement common standards for appointing and assessing management body members, including requirements for sufficient time commitment, knowledge, skills, experience, honesty, integrity, and independence of mind. These entities are required to notify the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) of the identity of all management body members and any changes to their composition, as well as to report any material conflicts of interest and mitigating measures. The guidelines apply from 3 January 2018, with the circular entering into force on the date of the law transposing MiFID II.
CSSF published 3 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
Circular CSSF 18/690 page 1/2
In case of discrepancies between the French and the English text, the French text shall prevail. Luxembourg, 13 April 2018 To all market operators and data reporting services providers CIRCULAR CSSF 18/690 Re: Guidelines of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) on the management body of market operators and data reporting services providers Ladies and Gentlemen, The purpose of this circular is to implement the ESMA Guidelines on the management body of market operators and data reporting services providers pursuant to Article 45(9) of Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments (MiFID II) for market operators and Article 63(2) of MiFID II for data reporting services providers, into the Luxembourg regulatory framework.
Circular CSSF 18/690 page 2/2
Furthermore, pursuant to the guidelines on independence of mind and more particularly as regards conflicts of interest, the management body of the market operator or data reporting services provider is required to notify any material conflict of interest identified and the mitigating measures taken by the management body to the CSSF. The notifications must be sent to the CSSF by post.
3. Entry into force
This circular enters into force on the date of entry into force of the law transposing MiFID II. Yours faithfully, COMMISSION DE SURVEILLANCE DU SECTEUR FINANCIER Françoise KAUTHEN Claude SIMON Simone DELCOURT Claude MARX Director General
Annex:
ESMA Guidelines on the management body of market operators and data reporting services providers (Ref.: 19/12/2017 | ESMA70-154-271)
28 September 2017 | ESMA70-154-271
Guidelines on the management body of market operators and data reporting services providers
Table of Contents
1 Scope............................................................................................................................. 3
2 Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 4
3 Purpose.......................................................................................................................... 5
4 Compliance and reporting obligations............................................................................. 6
4.1 Status of the guidelines ........................................................................................... 6
4.2 Reporting requirements........................................................................................... 6
5 Guidelines on management bodies pursuant to Article 45(9) and Article 65(3) of MiFID II
5.1 Sufficient time commitment: general........................................................................ 6
5.2 Sufficient time commitment: calculation of the number of directorships ................... 7
5.3 Knowledge, skills and experience............................................................................ 8
5.4 Honesty and integrity..............................................................................................10
5.5 Independence of mind............................................................................................11
5.6 Adequate human and financial resources devoted to the induction and training of
members of the management body of market operators ...................................................13
5.7 Diversity .................................................................................................................14
5.8 Record-keeping......................................................................................................15
1 Scope
Who?
1 Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349–496). 2 Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84).
2 Definitions
4. Unless otherwise specified, terms used in MiFID II have the same meaning in these
guidelines.
3 Purpose
5. The purpose of these guidelines is to develop common standards to be taken into
consideration by market operators and DRSPs when appointing new and assessing current members of the management body and to provide guidance on how information should be recorded by market operators and DRSPs in order to make it available to the competent authorities for the exercise of their supervisory duties.
4 Compliance and reporting obligations
4.1 Status of the guidelines
6. This document contains guidelines issued under Article 45(9) and Article 63(2) of MiFID II
and guidelines issued under Article 16 of ESMA Regulation. In accordance with Article 16(3) of the ESMA Regulation, competent authorities and financial market participants must make every effort to comply with guidelines and recommendations.
7. Competent authorities to whom the guidelines apply should comply by incorporating them
into their supervisory practices, including where particular guidelines within the document are directed primarily at financial market participants.
4.2 Reporting requirements
8. Competent authorities to which these guidelines apply must notify ESMA whether they
comply or intend to comply with the guidelines, with reasons for non-compliance, within two months of the date of publication by ESMA in all EU official languages to smk@esma.europa.eu. In the absence of a response by this deadline, competent authorities will be considered as non-compliant. A template for notifications is available on the ESMA website.
9. Market operators and data reporting services providers are not required to report whether
they comply with these guidelines.
5 Guidelines on management bodies pursuant to Article 45(9) and Article 65(3) of MiFID II
5.1 Sufficient time commitment: general
10. Market operators and DRSPs should have a written policy detailing the functions and
responsibilities of the management body and setting out ex ante a comprehensive job description and the anticipated time commitment required for each position. The anticipated time commitment should be adapted to the functions and responsibilities taking into account in particular whether it refers to an executive or a non-executive position.
11. When a person is selected to become a member of the management body, the anticipated
time commitment for the position should be recorded in writing, and the market operator or the DRSP should require the prospective member to confirm in writing that he or she can devote that amount of time to the role, including the possibility to devote additional
time when the market operator or the DRSP is undergoing a period of particularly increased activity. The effective appointment for the position should not take place without such a written confirmation by the prospective member.
12. Where a person is selected to become part of the management body of a market operator
which is significant in terms of its size, internal organisation and the nature, the scope and the complexity of its activities, this person should confirm in writing that he or she complies with the limitations of the number of directorships set out in Article 45(2)(a) of MiFID II.
13. Prospective members should provide the market operator or the DRSP with information
regarding:
a. directorships held in other financial and non-financial companies, including when acting on behalf of a legal person or as an alternate appointed by a member of the management body to attend meetings; b. directorships held in organisations which do not pursue predominantly commercial objectives;
c. other functions and professional activities within and outside the financial sector
relevant in terms of time commitment; and, d. the nature of his/her responsibilities under any of the previous points.
14. Members of the management body of market operators or DRSPs should notify the market
operator or DRSP of any material change in the information provided in accordance with the previous paragraph.
15. The records foreseen in Section 5.8 of these Guidelines should be updated whenever a
member notifies the market operator or DRSP of a change in his/her external professional functions and/or whenever such a change comes to the attention of the market operator or DRSP. Following this, the market operator or DRSP should reassess the member’s ability in respect of the required time-commitment.
16. The nomination committee (where established) or the management body in its supervisory
function should take into account the cumulative time commitment shown by the members of the management body, using the attendance to the management body’s meetings as one of the indicators of time commitment.
5.2 Sufficient time commitment: calculation of the number of directorships
17. Where a directorship involves at the same time executive and non-executive
responsibilities, the directorship should count as an executive directorship.
a. each of the material activities of the market operator/DRSP; b. financial accounting and reporting;
c. strategic planning;
d. risk management; e. compliance and internal audit; f. information technology and security; g. local, regional and global markets where applicable; h. the regulatory environment; and,
i. the management of (inter)national groups and risks related to group structures where
applicable.
25. At an individual level, prospective members of the management body should have an upto-date understanding of the activities of the market operator or DRSP and related risks,
the market operator’s or DRSP’s governance arrangements, the prospective position and responsibilities and, where applicable, the group’s structure at a level commensurate with their responsibilities. This includes an appropriate understanding of those areas for which an individual member is not directly responsible but is collectively accountable together with the other members of the management body.
26. As regards the education, consideration should be given to the level and profile of the
education and whether it relates to financial services or activities or any other relevant area of knowledge described above (financial accounting and reporting, strategic planning and so forth). For this purpose, market operators and DRSPs should take into consideration both the theoretical knowledge and skills attained through education and training as well as the practical experience gained in previous occupations by the prospective member.
27. As regards the practical experience, consideration should be given to the practical and
professional experience gained from a managerial position over a sufficiently long period. Short term or temporary positions can be considered in the assessment but are usually not sufficient to support adequate expertise.
5.4 Honesty and integrity
28. When assessing the honesty and integrity of a prospective member of their management
body, market operators and DRSPs should request and check the accuracy of the documents set out in Article 4 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/571 of 2 June 2016 on authorisation, organisational requirements and the publication of transactions for DRSPs 3 and should in particular take into consideration whether the prospective member has been:
a. subject to an adverse decision in any proceedings of a disciplinary nature brought by a regulatory authority or government body or is the subject of any such proceedings which are not concluded; b. subject to an adverse judicial finding in civil proceedings before a court in connection with the provision of financial or data services, or for impropriety or fraud in the management of a business;
c. part of the management body of an undertaking which was subject to an adverse
decision or penalty by a regulatory authority or whose registration or authorisation was withdrawn by a regulatory authority; d. refused the right to carry on activities which require registration or authorisation by a regulatory authority; e. part of the management body of an undertaking which has gone into insolvency or liquidation while the person was employed by the undertaking or within a year of the person ceasing to be employed by the undertaking; f. fined, suspended, disqualified, or been subject to any other sanction in relation to fraud, embezzlement or in connection with the provision of financial or data services, by a professional body; or, g. disqualified from acting as a director, disqualified from acting in any managerial capacity, dismissed from employment or other appointment in an undertaking as a consequence of misconduct or malpractice.
29. Members of the management body should immediately report to the market operator or
DRSP any of the circumstances mentioned above for a reassessment of their suitability.
3 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/571 of 2 June 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the authorisation, organisational requirements and the publication of transactions for data reporting services providers (OJ L 87; 31.3.2017; p. 126).
c. is or has been, within 18 months, a principal of a material professional adviser or a
material consultant to a market operator or DRSP or another entity of a market operator’s or DRSP’s group, or an employee materially associated with the service provided; d. for the management body of market operators, is or has been, within 18 months, a shareholder whose participation reaches or exceeds 5% of voting rights or a member of the management body of a company listed on that market; e. is or has been a material supplier or customer of a market operator or DRSP or another entity of a market operator’s/DRSP’s group, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly or indirectly with a material supplier or customer; and f. has or used to have any other material contractual relationship with a market operator/DRSP or another entity of a market operator’s or DRSP’s group other than as a member of the management body.
33. The references in the preceding paragraph to “a market operator or DRSP” encompasses
both the market operator or DRSP of which the person is a member or prospective member and also a competing market operator or DRSP.
34. The existence of a circumstance which may give rise to a conflict of interest does not
automatically preclude a member or prospective member from being part of a market operator’s or DRSP’s management body. Prior to the appointment the market operator/DRSP should assess any circumstance which may give rise to a conflict of interest or actual conflicts of interest, notably with the management body’s conflicts of interest policy described below and decide, where appropriate, on mitigating measures. After the appointment, any new circumstances which may give rise to a conflict of interest or new actual conflict of interest should be disclosed and the mitigating measures should be approved by the management body.
35. The management body of market operators and DRSPs should have a formal written
conflicts of interest policy and an objective compliance process for implementing the policy. The policy should include at least:
a. a member’s duty to avoid to the extent possible activities that could create conflicts of interest; b. examples of where conflicts can arise when serving as a management body member;
c. a rigorous review and approval process for members to follow before they engage in
certain activities (such as serving on another management body) so as to ensure that such activity will not create a conflict of interest;
d. a member’s duty to promptly disclose any matter that may result, or has already resulted, in a conflict of interest, having particular regard to the circumstances described above; e. a member’s duty to abstain from voting on any matter where the member may have a conflict of interest or where the member’s objectivity or ability to properly fulfil duties to the market operator/DRSP may be otherwise compromised; f. adequate procedures for transactions with related parties so that they are made on an arm’s length basis; and, g. the way in which the management body will deal with any non-compliance with the policy.
36. The management body should ensure that public disclosure is made of the market
operator´s and DRSP´s policies on conflicts of interest. National competent authorities shall be notified about any material conflicts of interest identified and the mitigating measures taken by the management body.
5.6 Adequate human and financial resources devoted to the induction
and training of members of the management body of market operators
37. Individual members of the management body of market operators should be and remain
suitable, including through training, for their position. Market operators should establish a policy for the induction of the members of their management body. Market operators should facilitate the maintenance of members’ understanding of the market operator’s activities, structure, business model, risk profile, regulatory environment and governance arrangements and members’ role in them. Market operators should also provide for relevant general and, as appropriate, individually tailored training programmes to ensure that all members are kept up to date. Training policy should also promote the awareness regarding diversity in the management body.
38. The training policy should be adopted by the management body in its supervisory function.
The management body should involve the nomination committee if such is established.
39. The training policy should set out:
a. the induction and training objectives for the management body separately for the management function and the supervisory function and, where appropriate, specific positions according to their specific responsibilities and involvement in committees;
b. the responsibilities for the development of a detailed training programme;
c. the financial and human resources available in order to ensure that induction and
training can be provided in line with the policy; and d. a clear process for any member of the management body to request induction or training.
40. The policy and training programs should be kept up to date, and consider changes in
governance, strategy, products covered and other relevant processes, as well as changes in applicable legislation and market developments.
41. Market operators should use evaluation processes to review the effectiveness of the
training provided.
5.7 Diversity
42. Market operators should, in accordance with the nature, scale and complexity of their
activity, put in place a recruitment and diversity policy to ensure that a broad set of qualities and competences are considered when recruiting members of the management body. To that end, it should set concrete objectives in terms of diversity.
43. Market operators should set a target for the representation of the underrepresented
gender.
44. The recruitment and diversity policy should at least refer to educational and professional
background, gender, age and geographical provenance with the aim to achieve a variety of views and experiences. Without prejudice to national law, the diversity policy should provide a reference to the geographical provenance in case the market operator operates in more than one jurisdiction.
45. Without prejudice to national law, the recruitment and diversity policy may provide for
employee representation within the management body in order to add a different perspective and genuine knowledge and experience of the activities undertaken by the market operator.
46. The market operators’ selection procedures should ensure that the candidates shortlisted
for becoming members of their management bodies cover at least one of the areas of diversity described above which is not currently present on the management body. Market operators should not recruit members of the management body with the sole purpose of increasing diversity to the detriment of the functioning and suitability of the management body collectively, or at the expense of the suitability of individual members of the management body.
l. records of the selection procedures linked to the requirements contained in these
Guideline.
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
Source: Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works
More like this from CSSF
CSSF published 3 documents in the last 30 days. We email you each new one the day it's published.