Adjunct Superintendent Resolution No. 047-2025-SMV/11

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Securities Market
Superintendency
“Decade of Equal Opportunities for Women and Men” "Year of recovery and consolidation of the Peruvian economy" 1 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its Regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml Adjunct Superintendent Resolution SMV No. 047-2025-SMV/11 Lima, July 31, 2025 Summar: To sanction Banco Internacional del Perú S.A.A. - INTERBANK with one (01) admonition for having committed one (01) minor infraction typified in subparagraph 3.1 of number 3 of Annex I of the Sanctions Regulation. Administered: Banco Internacional del Perú S.A.A. - INTERBANK Subject: Administrative Sanctioning Procedure of single administrative instance Main Type: Subparagraph 3.1 of number 3 of Annex I of the Sanctions Regulation MINOR INFRACTIONS File No.: 2025012375 The Adjunct Superintendent of Market Conduct Supervision SEEN:
The administrative file No. 2025012375, containing the administrative sanctioning procedure initiated by the General Superintendency of Conduct Compliance of the Securities Market Superintendency – SMV (hereinafter, the IGCC), against Banco Internacional del Perú S.A.A. - INTERBANK (hereinafter, the Issuer); as well as Report No. 841-2025- SMV/11.2 (hereinafter, the Report), issued by the IGCC; CONSIDERING:
I. FUNCTION AND COMPETENCE OF THE SASCM

1. That, the IGCC – the instructing body of the
   administrative sanctioning procedures (hereinafter, the PAS) referred to in this case – has brought to the attention of the Adjunct Superintendency of Market Conduct Supervision of the SMV (hereinafter, SASCM), the PAS of administrative file No. 2025012375, in order for it to issue a decision as the sanctioning body of single administrative instance in the present PAS. In this way, the SASCM assumes competence in observance of the exercise of the function of supervision and of the sanctioning faculty of the Securities Market Superintendency

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Securities Market
Superintendency
“Decade of Equal Opportunities for Women and Men” "Year of recovery and consolidation of the Peruvian economy" 2 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its Regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml – SMV established through the Unified Concorded Text of its Organic Law, Decree Law No. 26126 (hereinafter, LOSMV), and the Unified Ordered Text of the Securities Market Law, Legislative Decree No. 861, approved by Supreme Decree No. 020-2023-EF-1 1 (hereinafter, TUO LMV); as well as by what is provided in the Sanctions Regulation, approved by SMV Resolution No. 035-2018-SMV/01 (hereinafter, Sanctions Regulation); and, in articles 42 and 43 of the Regulation on Organization and Functions of the Securities Market Superintendency – SMV, approved by Supreme Decree No. 216-2011-EF (hereinafter, ROF-SMV), in the sense that it is a specific function of the SASCM, to impose sanctions in single administrative instance, whose control of compliance corresponds to the referenced Adjunct Superintendency. Likewise; the SASCM has the faculties to issue corrective measures aimed at reversing the situation altered by the commission of the infraction;
II. FACTS, CHARGES AND DEFENSES OF THE ISSUER
2.1 Facts
2. That, it was evaluated whether the Issuer complied or not with
the obligation to disclose to the securities market the significant events;
2.2 Charge
3. That, as a result of said evaluation,
through Letter No. 1776-2025-SMV/11.2 (hereinafter, Letter of Charges), the charge was formulated to communicate late the significant event referred to the press release of Moody’s Investor Service ratifying the previous credit rating and maintaining the negative outlook on the institution and its securities, published on September 23, 2024, which should have been communicated on the same day; however, it was communicated on September 24, 2024 (File No. 2024040155);
2.3 Defenses
4. That, through a document presented on April 15, 2025,
the Issuer presented its defenses stating; among others, the following:
“(...)
Regarding this fact, we must indicate that INTERBANK expressly recognizes responsibility for not having submitted the Rating Report within the deadlines established in the Regulation on Significant Events. (...) We request that the recognition of the fault by INTERBANK be taken into consideration, which constitutes a mitigating factor as established in subparagraph a) of article 26 of the Sanctions Regulation, in concordance with number 2, subparagraph a, of article 257 of the General Administrative Procedure Law. (...) ”;
5. That, through Supreme Decree No. 004-2019-
JUS, the Unified Ordered Text of Law No. 27444, General Administrative Procedure Law (hereinafter, TUO of the LPAG), was approved, which contains common norms for the actions of the administrative function of the State and regulates all administrative procedures developed in the entities, including special procedures. Likewise, number 3) of article 248 of the TUO of the

1
Through Supreme Decree No. 020-2023-EF, published on February 10, 2023 in the Official Newspaper El Peruano, the Unified Ordered Text of the Securities Market Law, Legislative Decree No. 861 was approved.

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Securities Market
Superintendency
“Decade of Equal Opportunities for Women and Men” "Year of recovery and consolidation of the Peruvian economy" 3 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its Regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml LPAG, points out the criteria regarding the graduation of the sanction: (a) The illicit benefit resulting from the commission of the infraction, (b) The probability of detection of the infraction, (c) The gravity of the damage to the public interest and/or protected legal good, (d) The economic harm caused, (e) Recidivism, for the commission of the same infraction within a period of one (1) year from when the resolution that sanctioned the first infraction became final, (f) The circumstances of the commission of the infraction and, (g) The existence or non-existence of intent in the conduct of the infractor;
6. That, the charges, the defenses and the criteria
regarding the graduation of the sanction have been the subject of evaluation in the Report, which has been submitted to the knowledge of the SASCM;
7. That, in observance of what is provided by number
5 of article 255 of the TUO of the LPAG, through Letter No. 3633-2025-SMV/11 of July 2, 2025, the Report was sent to the Issuer so that it could formulate its allegations within a period of five (05) business days; however, despite being legally notified via the MVNet System in accordance with the MVNet Regulation, to date, it has not presented them;
III. QUESTIONS TO BE DETERMINED
8. That, in the present PAS it corresponds to determine
the following:
(i) Whether the Issuer incurred or did not incur the infraction indicated in the Letter of Charges and Report; (ii) Whether it corresponds or does not correspond to impose a sanction on the Issuer;
IV. ANALYSIS
4.1 Applicable Normativity
9. That, article 30 of the TUO of the LMV states: “The
registration of a certain value or issuance program entails for its issuer the obligation to inform the SMV and, if applicable, to the respective stock exchange or entity responsible for the conduct of the centralized trading mechanism, of significant events, including ongoing negotiations, about itself, the value and the offer that is made of it, as well as the obligation to disclose such events in a truthful, sufficient and timely manner. The information must be provided to these institutions and disclosed as soon as the event occurs or the issuer takes knowledge of the same, as the case may be.” (Underline added);
10. That, article 3 of the Regulation on Significant Events and Confidential Information, approved by SMV Resolution No. 005-2014-
SMV/01 (hereinafter, Regulation on Significant Events) states that: “Significant event is any act, decision, agreement, fact, ongoing negotiation or information referred to the issuer, to its securities, or to its businesses that have the capacity to influence significantly in:
3.1. The decision of a sensible investor to buy, sell or keep a security; or,
3.2. The liquidity, the price or the quotation of the issued securities. Likewise, it comprises the information of the economic group of the Issuer that it knows or that it reasonably should know it, and
that has the capacity to influence significantly in the Issuer or in its securities, according to what is stated in the present Regulation”;
11. That, in accordance with what is established in
article 4 of the Regulation on Significant Events to evaluate the capacity of
significant influence of the information and its possible qualification as a significant

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Securities Market
Superintendency
“Decade of Equal Opportunities for Women and Men” "Year of recovery and consolidation of the Peruvian economy" 4 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its Regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml event, the Issuer must consider the transcendence of the act, agreement, fact, going negotiation, decision or set of circumstances in its activity, assets, results, financial situation or business or commercial position in general; or in its securities or in the offer of these; as well as in the price or the negotiation of its securities;
12. That, number 9.1 of article 9 of the Regulation
on Significant Events states: “The Issuer must inform its significant event as soon as such event occurs or the Issuer takes knowledge of it, and in no case later than the day on which it has occurred or has been known (...)”. (Underline added);
13. That, in that sense, for the purposes of determining the
possible sanction, these infractions are typified as minor infractions in subparagraph 3.1 of number 3 of Annex I of the Sanctions Regulation, which establishes as an infraction: “Present outside the established deadline, or do it in an incomplete manner, or, without observing the technical specifications approved by the SMV or without communicating the approval by the corresponding corporate body, to the SMV, to the Stock Exchange, to the entity in charge of the centralized trading mechanism or to any other entity or subject of the securities market, the individual or consolidated audited financial information, the individual or consolidated interim financial statements, management report, special audit report, significant events and, annual reports”. (Highlight and underline added);
14. That, according to article 35 of the Sanctions
Regulation, this infraction is sanctionable with an admonition or fine not less than one (01) UIT and up to twenty-five (25) UIT;
4.2 Evaluation of the case
15. That, in administrative file No.
2025012375, which contains the documentation of the present PAS, it is appreciated that through Memorandum No. 5365-2024-SMV/11.1 of December 30, 2024 (File No. 2024051959), the General Superintendency of Conduct Supervision (hereinafter, IGSC) – the body of the Securities Market Superintendency – SMV that has within its functions and faculties, the supervision of the compliance of the norms applicable to issuer companies with securities registered in the Public Registry of the Securities Market - RPMV, evaluating the indications of possible infractions, and sends, for its consideration, the reports of indications of infraction respectively, to the IGCC – sent to the IGCC, the result of its evaluation, and specifically what refers to the present case;
16. That, it must be kept in mind that the
procedures and legal forms with which the IGSC conducts its activity of audit and/or supervision and upon concluding it with a report of indications of infraction, determine that its pronouncement or opinion on a specific topic of supervision – which even can contain a decision, for example, the adoption of corrective measures – is an opinion on the merits of the matter; it must be specified that said opinion and the report of indications of infraction of the IGSC is not binding for the IGCC, as established in the second paragraph of

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Securities Market
Superintendency
“Decade of Equal Opportunities for Women and Men” "Year of recovery and consolidation of the Peruvian economy" 5 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its Regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml
article 9 of the Sanctions Regulation 2 3
;
17. That, in this way it is had that in the evaluation
of the facts related to the present PAS have intervened and participated previously to the issuance of the present resolution, two (2) other bodies or administrative instances of the SMV, functionally independent among themselves and from this Office; first the IGSC that at its opportunity reported the indications of infraction and then the IGCC that, as a result of its evaluation, formulated the Letter of Charges and the Report; and at this point of the PAS it corresponds to the Office of the SASCM, to issue pronouncement containing its decision regarding the charges mentioned, being precise to indicate that by the nature of the same, as has been indicated previously, it will be a decision of single administrative instance for the charge on late communication of significant events;
18. That, as mentioned previously,
through a document of April 15, 2025, the Issuer presented its defenses regarding the charge formulated against it, stating that it recognized the infraction imputed and requested that the recognition of the infraction be taken into consideration as a mitigating factor when imposing a sanction;
19. That, regarding this, having the Issuer presented
its defenses within the period granted for the presentation of defenses, it corresponds to indicate that the voluntary declaration of the recognition of the infraction by the Issuer is reputed as a condition of mitigating responsibility, so that when the applicable sanction is a fine, it is reduced by fifty percent (50%) if the recognition is presented within the period granted to present defenses, according to number 1 of subparagraph a) of article 26 of the Sanctions Regulation, concordant with subparagraph a) of number 2 of article 257 of the TUO of the LPAG, which will be considered at the time of the determination of the sanction.
20. That, consequently, the conduct
constitutive of the infraction subject of charge is accredited and the administrative responsibility of the Issuer is determined, by reason of which, it corresponds to analyze the proposal of sanction in attention to what is provided by the principle of reasonableness, the defenses and the criteria of sanction, which will be evaluated in the section of determination of the sanction;
V. DETERMINATION OF THE SANCTION
21. That, for the purposes of determining the possible sanction,

2 In article 245 of the TUO of the LPAG it is indicated as forms or modes in which the audit activity could conclude the following: 1) Certificate of conformity of the activity developed by the administered; 2) Recommendation of improvements or corrections of the activity developed by the administered; 3) The warning of the existence of non-compliances not susceptible of meriting the determination of administrative responsibilities
4) The recommendation of the initiation of a procedure with the purpose of determining the administrative responsibilities
that correspond; 5) The adoption of corrective measures and 6) Other forms as established by the special laws. 3 «Article 9.- Preliminary inquiries as a consequence of supervision actions (...) When said bodies conclude that there are sufficient indications of possible administrative infractions they send the corresponding reports to the General Superintendencies of Compliance, which determine if it corresponds to initiate or not an administrative sanctioning procedure. If applicable, the General Superintendencies of Compliance may carry out additional inspections or investigations of the reported indications. In the case of possible infractions in the scope of the Regulation on the Activity of Participatory Financial Financing and its Managing Societies, the preliminary inquiries are carried out by the General Superintendency of Investigation and Innovation, a dependency that if there are sufficient indications of possible administrative infractions determines if it corresponds to initiate or not an administrative sanctioning procedure. (...) ».

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Securities Market
Superintendency
“Decade of Equal Opportunities for Women and Men” "Year of recovery and consolidation of the Peruvian economy" 6 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its Regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml regarding the infraction on late communication of significant events, it must be indicated that according to what is provided in subparagraph 3.1 of number 3 of Annex I of the Sanctions Regulation, it states that it constitutes a minor infraction:
“Present outside the established deadline, or do it in an incomplete manner, or, without observing the technical specifications approved by the SMV or without communicating the approval by the corresponding corporate body, to the SMV, to the Stock Exchange, to the entity in charge of the centralized trading mechanism or to any other entity or subject of the securities market, the individual or consolidated audited financial information, the individual or consolidated interim financial statements, management report, special audit report, significant events and, annual reports.” (Highlight and underline added);
22. That, according to what is established in article
35 of the Sanctions Regulation, it corresponds that these infractions be sanctioned with an admonition or fine not less than one (1) UIT and up to the limit of twenty-five (25) UIT.
5.1 Sanction Criteria
23. That, having determined the commission of the
infractions imputed, it corresponds to evaluate the sanction in accordance with
article 25 of the Sanctions Regulation, concordant with number 3) of article
248 of the TUO of the LPAG) and article 344 of the TUO of the LMV, which develop the criteria for graduation of sanction: (i) the sanction history of the issuer, (ii) recidivism, (iii) the circumstances of the commission of the infraction, (iv) the economic harm caused and its repercussion in the market, (v) the illicit benefit resulting from the commission of the infraction, (vi) the probability of detection of the infraction, (vii) the gravity of the damage to the public interest and/or protected legal good and (viii) the existence or non-existence of intent in the conduct of the infractor;
24. That, for the purposes of determining the sanction to
be imposed on the Issuer for the non-compliance referred to the late communication of significant events, the Gradual Regime of Sanctions for late presentation of financial information, annual report and significant events (hereinafter, Gradual Regime of Sanctions), approved by SMV Resolution No. 007-2023-SMV/01;
25. That, in application of the aforementioned norms,
it proceeds to evaluate the following:
26. That, with respect to the gravity of the damage to the
public interest and/or protected legal good, it must be indicated that the timely presentation of periodic or eventual information by the issuers of securities registered in the RPMV constitutes a fundamental obligation in the transparency of the securities market, so that market participants can carry out their investment decisions adequately informed. Consequently, although no gravity of damage to the public interest is evidenced, the non-compliance with the obligation to inform the market within the deadline limits on the part of the issuers affects the transparency of the market, which is considered a protected legal good;
27. That, regarding the sanction history, the
Gradual Regime of Sanctions states that “The resulting amount of the application of the guidelines contemplated in number 6.2 can be increased up to five percent (5%) if it is accredited that the infringing subject has a history

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Securities Market
Superintendency
“Decade of Equal Opportunities for Women and Men” "Year of recovery and consolidation of the Peruvian economy"

SMV
Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores
“Decenio de la Igualdad de Oportunidades para Mujeres y Hombres” "Año de la recuperación y consolidación de la economía peruana" 7 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml of sanction”, without making a distinction as to whether they correspond to different or the same type offender. Therefore, in order to determine which rule is more beneficial, it is considered that the application of the new regulations will increase by one percent (1%) for each sanction resolution that constitutes the antecedent up to a maximum of five percent (5%). Regarding this matter, from the verification carried out in the System of Sanctions of the SMV, it has been determined that the Issuer does not have antecedents of sanction, as evaluated in the Report;
28. That, regarding recidivism for the commission
of the same infraction, the Graduated Sanctions Regime states that: “The resulting amount from the application of the guidelines contemplated in paragraph 6.2 may be increased (…) up to ten percent (10%) if it is verified that the offending subject is a recidivist”; in this sense, it is considered that it will increase by five percent (5%) when the Issuer has one (01) sanction resolution that grants recidivism or ten percent (10%) when it has two (02) or more sanction resolutions that grant recidivism. Regarding this, it has been verified that there is no recidivism on the part of the Issuer, as evaluated in the Report;
29. That, regarding the circumstances of the
commission of the infraction, it must be noted that, from the verification of the information disseminated by the issuers on the Institutional Page of the SMV, it is noted that the untimely communication of the important fact referred to in the press release of Moody’s Investor Service ratifying the previous credit rating and maintaining the negative outlook on the institution and its securities, published on September 23 2024, which should have been communicated on the same day; however, it was communicated on September 24, 2024 (with a (01) calendar day delay).
30. That, regarding the economic damage caused
and its repercussion on the market, we must point out that there is indeed a damage that impacts the market because by not disseminating relevant information such as important facts in a timely manner, there is an impact on the transparency of the securities market, which is considered a protected legal interest;
31. That, regarding the illicit benefit resulting from
the commission of the infraction, it must be noted that there are no elements sufficient to indicate that the Issuer as a consequence of the infractions committed has obtained or generated an illicit benefit;
32. That, regarding the probability of detection
of the infraction, it must be noted that the failure to present timely information periodic or eventual; is verified through internal control systems, so it is considered that for this type of non-compliance, the probability detection is high;
33. That, regarding the existence or non-existence
of intent in the offender's conduct, it can be noted that there are no elements sufficient to indicate that the Issuer acted with intent in the commission of the infractions, so this criterion would not have been configured. However, it is necessary to indicate that despite there being no indications to suggest that the Issuer acted with intent, it can be affirmed that the Issuer's conduct was negligent, by not acting with the diligence required given obligations already known by the Issuer;

Regarding the application of a reprimand sanction
34. That, regarding the communication of facts of

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores
“Decenio de la Igualdad de Oportunidades para Mujeres y Hombres” "Año de la recuperación y consolidación de la economía peruana" 8 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml importance, paragraph 6.1 of the Graduated Sanctions Regime states that a reprimand sanction may be applied when the following occur simultaneously: (i) When the impact on transparency in the market is minimal; (ii) The infraction committed has not caused concrete harm to investors or associates; (iii) The offending subject does not have antecedents or if it does, they are sanctions corresponding to minor infractions imposed by the SMV that had become final within four (4) years prior to the commission of the infraction being evaluated; (iv) The offending subject is not a recidivist; (v) The offender has not obtained benefits from their administrative infraction; and, (vi) It has not been proven that the offender acted with intent in the commission of the infraction;
35. That, as detailed in the evaluation of the
sanction criteria, it can be noted that: (i) The impact on transparency in the market was minimal; (ii) The infraction committed has not caused concrete harm to investors or associates, since no type of complaint or receipt of indication has been registered regarding this; (iii) The Issuer does not have antecedents of infraction nor is it a recidivist; (iv) The offending subject has not obtained a benefit from their illegal conduct; and, (v) It has not been proven that the offender acted with intent in the commission of the infraction;
36. That, therefore, having been fulfilled concurrently with what is stated in paragraph 6.1 of the Graduated Sanctions Regime and the evaluation carried out by this Deputy Superintendency,
it corresponds to impose on the Issuer a (01) reprimand for the non-compliance subject of the charge;

Regarding the Recognition of Responsibility
37. That, the Issuer through a written submission of defenses
presented on April 15, 2025, expressly recognized responsibility for the charge formulated in the present PAS;
38. That, in accordance with what was determined in the
preceding considerations through which it has been decided to impose the sanction of a (01) reprimand, since no fine sanction is determined for the Issuer, it is unnecessary to apply the fifty percent (50%) discount established in paragraph 1 of letter a) of article 26 of the Sanctions Regulation, which regulates the recognition as a mitigating factor for sanctions, and;

Being in accordance with what is provided in paragraphs 14 and 36 of
article 43 of the Organization and Functions Regulation of the Superintendency of the
Securities Market – SMV, approved by Supreme Decree No. 216-2011-EF;

RESOLVES:
Article 1º.- Declare that Banco Internacional del
Perú S.A.A. - INTERBANK, has incurred a (01) infraction of a minor nature typed in paragraph 3, subsection 3.1 of Annex I of the Sanctions Regulation, approved by SMV Resolution No. 035-2018-SMV/01, for communicating in a timely manner the important fact referred to in the press release of Moody’s Investor Service ratifying the previous credit rating and maintaining the negative outlook on the institution and its securities, published on September 23, 2024, which should have been communicated on the same day.

PERÚ Ministry of Economy and Finance

SMV
Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores
“Decenio de la Igualdad de Oportunidades para Mujeres y Hombres” "Año de la recuperación y consolidación de la economía peruana" 9 Electronically signed document in the framework of Law No. 27269, Law of Digital Signatures and Certificates, its regulations and modifications. The integrity of the document and the authorship of the signature(s) can be verified at https://apps.firmaperu.gob.pe/web/validador.xhtml
Article 2º.- Sanction Banco Internacional del
Perú S.A.A. - INTERBANK, with a (01) reprimand for what is provided in article 1° of this Resolution.
Article 3º.- This Resolution does not exhaust the
administrative route, this being able to be challenged before this Deputy Superintendency of Supervision of Market Conduct by filing the reconsideration appeal, administrative appeal recognized in article 218 of the Single Consolidated Text of Law No. 27444, General Administrative Procedure Law, approved by Supreme Decree No. 004-2019-JUS, within the term of fifteen (15) business days counted from the day following its notification, as it is a procedure of a single administrative instance.
Article 4º.- In case this Resolution is not
subject to challenge, it must be published on the “Institutional Page of the SMV on the Unified Digital Platform of the Peruvian State for Citizen Orientation (www.gob.pe/smv)”, in observance of what is provided for in paragraph 1 of
article 7 of the “Policy on dissemination of normative projects, general legal norms, early agenda and other administrative acts of the SMV”,
approved by SMV Resolution No. 014-2014-SMV/01, and by what is provided for in the last paragraph of article 14 of the Sanctions Regulation, approved by SMV Resolution No. 035-2018-SMV/01.
Article 5º.- Transcribe this Resolution to
Banco Internacional del Perú S.A.A. – INTERBANK.
Register, communicate and publish.
Carlos Rivero Zevallos
Deputy Superintendent
Deputy Superintendency of Market Conduct Supervision