BS 1 - Statement of Principles on Bank Registration and Supervision — RBNZ — NZ

Statement of
Principles
Bank Registration and
Supervision
Prudential Supervision Department
Document BS1
Issued: December 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subject Page
A. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 3
B. PURPOSES OF BANK REGISTRATION AND SUPERVISION..................................... 3
C. BANK REGISTRATION.................................................................................................... 4
D. SUPERVISION.................................................................................................................. 21
E. CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION............................................................................... 23
F. VARIATION AND REMOVAL OF CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION................... 33
G. BREACHES OF CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION................................................... 33
H. BREACH OF MINIMUM CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO REQUIREMENTS........... 34
I. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS................................................................................... 35
J. CREDIT RATING REQUIREMENT ............................................................................... 35
K. RESPONSIBILITIES FOR NEW ZEALAND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF
OVERSEAS INCORPORATED BANKS........................................................................ 37
L. DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................................................... 37
M. CHANGES OF OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................... 39
N. ESTABLISHMENT OF OVERSEAS BRANCHES, REPRESENTATIVE OFFICES
OR SUBSIDIARIES ......................................................................................................... 40
O. CRISIS MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................. 40
P. FOREIGN SUPERVISOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION HELD BY REGISTERED
BANKS ............................................................................................................................. 45
Q. UNITED NATIONS SANCTIONS................................................................................... 46
APPENDIX ONE – STANDARD CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION............................... 47
APPENDIX TWO – CREDIT RATING REQUIREMENT ..................................................... 63
APPENDIX THREE – APPROVAL OF CREDIT RATING AGENCIES .............................. 64
BS1
December 2016

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES – BANK REGISTRATION
AND SUPERVISION
A. INTRODUCTION

In terms of section 67 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 (“the Act”), the
Reserve Bank is required to register banks and to undertake prudential supervision of registered banks. Part 5 of the Act confers various powers on the Bank in order to permit it to carry out these functions.
As required by section 75 of the Act, this document sets out the principles on which the
Bank acts:

in determining applications for registration; and
in imposing, varying, removing, or adding to conditions of registration.

In addition it sets out the principles on which the Reserve Bank acts in carrying out other
aspects of its prudential supervision role.
B. PURPOSES OF BANK REGISTRATION AND SUPERVISION
The Reserve Bank carries out its bank registration and supervision functions for the
purposes of:

promoting the maintenance of a sound and efficient financial system;
avoiding significant damage to the financial system that could result from the failure
of a registered bank.

Bank registration policy is aimed at ensuring that only financial institutions of appropriate
standing and repute, that can provide evidence of their ability to comply with all prudential requirements relating to the matters the Reserve Bank is required to have regard to when assessing an application for registration, are able to become registered banks. Subject to the above, impediments to the entry of new registered banks are kept to a minimum in order to encourage competition in the banking system. This approach recognises that competition can bring significant benefits to users of the services provided by registered banks. There is no upper limit on the number of registered banks.
Supervision of registered banks is not aimed at preventing individual bank failures or at
protecting creditors. Instead, supervision is aimed at encouraging the soundness and efficiency of the financial system as a whole. To the extent possible, this is achieved by drawing on and enhancing the disciplines on banks which are naturally present.
In the event that a registered bank failure does occur, the Reserve Bank will seek to
minimise damage to the financial system. This may involve the use of the crisis BS1 December 2016

management powers available under the Act. These crisis management powers include the ability to place a registered bank under statutory management and the ability to give directions to a registered bank that is in difficulties.
C. BANK REGISTRATION
8. The following section sets out the principles on which the Reserve Bank will act when
determining applications for registration as a registered bank. The Reserve Bank document entitled “Application for Status as a Registered Bank: Material to be Provided to the Reserve Bank” (BS3) identifies the information which should be provided in support of an application to become a registered bank.
9. In terms of section 73 of the Act, when determining an application for registration as a
registered bank, the Reserve Bank is required:

to satisfy itself that the applicant's business will substantially consist of the borrowing
and lending of money, or the provision of other financial services, or both; and
to have regard to the following matters:
the incorporation and ownership structure of the applicant;
the size and nature of the applicant’s business or proposed business or any part
of the applicant’s business;
the ability of the applicant to carry on its business or proposed business in a
prudent manner;
the standing of the applicant in the financial markets;
the suitability for their positions of the directors and senior managers of the
applicant;
the standing of the owner of the applicant in the financial markets; and
any other matters prescribed in regulations.

In terms of section 73A of the Act, if the applicant is an overseas person the Reserve Bank
is required to have regard to the following additional matters:

the law and regulatory requirements of the applicant’s home jurisdiction that relate to:
(i) the recognition and priorities of claims of creditors or classes of creditors in the event of the insolvency of the applicant; (ii) the disclosure by the applicant of financial and other information of the kind that a registered bank must disclose under section 81; (iii) the accounting and auditing standards applicable to the applicant; (iv) the duties and powers of directors of the applicant; and (v) the licensing, registration, authorisation and supervision of the applicant.
the nature and extent of the financial and other information disclosed to the public by
the applicant.

In terms of section 73B of the Act, the Reserve Bank is required to have regard to the
following additional matters if the applicant is a subsidiary of an overseas person:
BS1
December 2016

the law and regulatory requirements of the home jurisdiction of the overseas person
that relate to:
(i) the disclosure by the overseas person of financial and other information of the kind that a registered bank must disclose under section 81; (ii) the accounting and auditing standards applicable to the overseas person; (iii) the duties and powers of the directors of the overseas person; and (iv) the licensing, registration, authorisation and supervision of the overseas person.
the nature and extent of the financial and other information disclosed to the public by
the overseas person.

The principles the Reserve Bank applies when considering each of these matters are set
out below.
(I) Business of the applicant
The Reserve Bank is required to satisfy itself that at a minimum the business carried on, or
proposed to be carried on, by an applicant for registered bank status substantially consists of the borrowing or lending of money or the provision of other financial services. The manner in which this basic requirement is interpreted will vary depending on whether the applicant is incorporated locally or wishes to operate as a branch of an overseas incorporated company.
Where an applicant seeks to register as a locally incorporated registered bank, the Reserve
Bank will require the applicant and its subsidiaries (ie the New Zealand banking group) not to conduct any material insurance underwriting business or any material activities of a non-financial nature. As these requirements do not apply to any New Zealand business activities of the applicant’s owners conducted outside the New Zealand banking group, the effect is to constrain the manner in which insurance and non-financial business is structured, rather than to restrict the capacity of the owners to conduct that business.
Where an applicant wishes to register as a branch of an overseas incorporated entity, the
applicant will be required to satisfy the Reserve Bank that non-financial activities and insurance business will not constitute a majority of its overall activities in New Zealand, including activities conducted through subsidiaries. Where insurance or non-financial operations are, or will be, material relative to total activities, the applicant will be required to “quarantine” these operations in separately incorporated companies. These separately incorporated companies will be specifically excluded from the applicant’s New Zealand banking group. (The New Zealand banking group normally includes all of an overseas incorporated bank’s New Zealand business, including business conducted in subsidiaries, in line with financial reporting requirements specified in section 461B(2) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (or in section 9(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993, if that Act applies to the applicant.))
Applicants for registered bank status are required to provide the Reserve Bank with a
description of the nature and size of the businesses they conduct and/or intend to conduct, including details of business to be conducted via separately incorporated entities so that the Bank can assess whether or not these requirements will be met. BS1 December 2016
There is no requirement that certain types of financial services must be provided by
registered banks.
The Reserve Bank has not attempted to define ‘financial’ or ‘non-financial’ business or
services, as it recognises that the types of services provided by banks evolve and develop over time. However, when considering whether or not a particular service is ‘financial’, it will have regard to the types of services commonly offered by banks in New Zealand and in other similar countries. (II) Incorporation and ownership structure
The Reserve Bank seeks to ensure that a registered bank is in the ownership of entities or
individuals who collectively have incentives to monitor its activities closely and to influence its behaviour in a way which will improve or maintain its soundness. Such incentives are most likely to be present when the owners as a group have made a substantial financial commitment to the bank, and where the form of that commitment is such that they will be the first to absorb any losses which arise as a result of poor performance. The owners' incentives are likely to be further enhanced where there is potential for their reputation to be adversely affected by any problems which become evident in the bank.
In addition, there will need to be sufficient separation between the board of a bank and its
owners to ensure that the board does not have an unfettered ability to act in the interests of the owners where those interests diverge from those of the bank.
The Reserve Bank will assess ownership structures in the light of these factors.
As noted above, both locally incorporated entities and branches of banks incorporated
overseas may apply for registration.
The requirements which will apply to applicants wishing to operate a branch are as
follows:
(a) Branches of overseas persons
Where an applicant wishes to register as a branch of an overseas incorporated entity, that
entity will need to have bank status in its home jurisdiction.
All applicants which fall within the following categories, or which are expected to fall
within the following categories in the 5 years following registration, will be required to establish a locally incorporated entity rather than operate via a branch:

Systemically important banks, that is, banks whose New Zealand liabilities, net of
amounts due to related parties, exceed NZ$15 billion.
Retail deposit takers incorporated in a jurisdiction that has legislation which gives
deposits made, or credit conferred, in that jurisdiction a preferential claim in a BS1 December 2016

winding up. Australia and the United States are examples of countries with such legislation.

Retail deposit takers which do not provide adequate disclosure in the home
jurisdiction.
Applicants other than those listed above may also be required to incorporate locally, if
the Reserve Bank is not satisfied that supervisory arrangements (including disclosure arrangements) and market disciplines in the country of incorporation are adequate.

Systemically important banks
Systemically important banks are required to incorporate locally to provide a degree of assurance that the Reserve Bank would have the ability to manage a failure affecting one of these banks. Systemically important banks are those which are so large that their failure could have flow on effects to the banking system as a whole and the wider economy. For the purposes of this requirement, systemically important banks are defined as those whose New Zealand liabilities, net of amounts due to related parties, exceed $15 billion. This definition will normally be reviewed at three yearly intervals, and if appropriate, the size limit will be updated.
With a branch it may be difficult to determine what assets are, or would be, available to a
statutory manager in a failure and which liabilities can be attributed to the branch. This problem is becoming more acute over time as increasing geographical centralisation and integration of critical banking functions occur. The usefulness of branch accounts is further undermined by the fact that there are no prohibitions on the transfer of assets between branches of the same legal entity.
A locally incorporated bank has its own board of directors and those directors are required
under the Companies Act to act in the best interests of the company, to prevent the company from carrying on business in a manner likely to create a substantial risk of serious loss to the company’s creditors and to ensure that the company does not incur an obligation unless they believe that the company will be able to perform the obligation when required to do so. They must also ensure that they do not authorise a distribution to shareholders unless they are satisfied that immediately after the distribution the company will satisfy a solvency test. The Reserve Bank considers that these directors’ duties together with a legal entity structure provide much greater certainty in a failure situation and increase the likelihood that value will be retained in the local bank in the lead up to a failure.
Local incorporation also ensures that there is a clear delineation between the assets and
liabilities of the New Zealand bank and those of its parent. This makes it more likely that, should it prove necessary, a statutory manager could quickly take control of the bank and, if appropriate, re-open it for business within a reasonably short time frame.
Retail deposit takers
The restrictions on retail deposit takers’ ability to operate a branch in New Zealand are aimed at ensuring that retail depositors have access to the information they need to assess the risk of dealing with a particular bank. BS1 December 2016
For the purposes of these requirements a retail deposit taker is defined as a financial
institution that has more than $200 million in New Zealand retail deposits on its books. Retail deposits are defined as deposit liabilities held by natural persons, excluding liabilities with an outstanding balance of more than $250,000.
Where disclosure in the home jurisdiction is inadequate, depositors have no way of
assessing the financial strength of the bank as a whole and the likelihood of the bank failing. In such circumstances the effectiveness of market disciplines may be undermined.
When assessing the adequacy of disclosure, the Reserve Bank will take into consideration
the following:

The quality of accounting standards used to prepare the applicant’s accounts. Where
necessary, the Reserve Bank will require an applicant to provide independent verification that the accounting standards being used to prepare accounts for the legal entity proposing to operate a branch in New Zealand are sufficiently similar to accounting standards used in New Zealand to allow users of the accounts to make an assessment of the entity’s financial condition that would not differ materially from that which the user would make, if the accounts were prepared using New Zealand generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP);
The frequency of publication of the accounts. The Reserve Bank would normally
expect accounts to be published on at least a 6 monthly basis;
The timeliness of published accounts. Generally the Reserve Bank would wish to
satisfy itself that accounts are being published within 4 months of balance date;
The quality of auditing standards used by the auditors of the applicant’s accounts.
The Reserve Bank will wish to satisfy itself that these are reasonably equivalent to the standards applicable in New Zealand;
Disclosure of accounting policies. Without full disclosure of accounting policies it is
difficult for users of the accounts to interpret those accounts;
Availability of both legal entity and consolidated accounts. Generally both sets of
accounts are necessary to allow a full understanding of a bank’s position;
Disclosure of key indicators of financial soundness such as capital adequacy ratios
and impaired asset data.

Where legislation in an applicant’s home jurisdiction gives depositors or creditors in that
country a preferential claim on assets, it is very difficult for New Zealand depositors to assess their likely position, if the bank were to fail. In a failure situation, New Zealand depositors, depositors in the home jurisdiction, New Zealand creditors and creditors in the home jurisdiction would each have different claims on the same legal entity. Neither the legal entity accounts nor the branch accounts, nor both sets of accounts taken together, provide sufficient information for depositors and creditors to work out their position relative to other classes of creditor and depositor. The situation is even more complex when the legal entity has branches in other jurisdictions as well. BS1 December 2016
Wholesale depositors and creditors, while faced with the same information gap as retail
customers, are generally able to understand the deficiencies in disclosure information and can take them into account when making investment decisions. Thus the Reserve Bank will not require applicants which deal with wholesale clients to incorporate locally purely on the basis of inadequate disclosure or depositor preference legislation.
With a locally incorporated bank, depositors will have access to current financial
statements prepared in accordance with New Zealand generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for the legal entity with which they are dealing and assurance that, in a winding up, their claims would rank pari passu with those of other unsecured creditors (other than priority creditors such as the Inland Revenue Department and employees).
Other applicants
In assessing the adequacy of supervision in the home jurisdiction, the Reserve Bank will pay close attention to the adequacy of capital standards applied in the home country.
Applicants which wish to operate as a branch of an overseas bank will also need to satisfy
the Reserve Bank that the operations of the New Zealand branch will not constitute a predominant proportion of the business of the global bank.
Dual registration
Overseas persons may be permitted to operate both a branch and a bank subsidiary in New Zealand provided both entities comply with relevant prudential requirements relating to the matters listed in sections 73-73B of the RBNZ Act. The operation of a branch and a New Zealand incorporated subsidiary is referred to as “dual registration” and a person applying to register a branch operation alongside a registered bank subsidiary is called a “dual registration applicant”. 39A. Where the New Zealand operations of a dual registration applicant are not systemically important to New Zealand, the following requirements and restrictions may apply. These will be incorporated into the bank’s Conditions of Registration.

Standard requirements for non-systemic dual-registered banks: The New Zealand
branch operation is not permitted to accept retail deposits. If banks with a dual registration were able to take deposits through both the branch and the bank subsidiary it is likely that depositors would be confused about which entity they were dealing with. From the point of applying to commence business in New Zealand as a dual registration bank, the applicant will have a clear governance framework in place detailing how managerial and operational responsibilities are delegated to the New Zealand office and delineated across its local operations. The applicant must satisfy the Reserve Bank these arrangements give the branch Chief Executive adequate responsibility and accountability over the branch’s prudent operation.
Non-standard restrictions for non-systemic dual-registered banks (to be applied in
addition to the standard requirements for non-systemic dual-registered banks):
Where the Reserve Bank has concerns about the approach of the applicant’s home state to supervision and oversight, disclosure, accounting and auditing standards, or BS1 December 2016

bank insolvency and resolution arrangements (broadly ‘home state nonequivalence’), total New Zealand assets of the branch must not exceed those of the New Zealand incorporated subsidiary on any day of the year. The New Zealand branch operation must undertake wholesale business only - that is, business transacted with ‘wholesale investors’ defined under the Financial Market Conduct Act 2013 (Clause 3(2), Schedule 1). The Reserve Bank would expect wholesale business to be limited to simple balance sheet activities, and for any market-making activity to be conducted out of the New Zealand subsidiary. Where necessary to reinforce this expectation, permitted wholesale business at the branch operation may be further restricted at the Reserve Bank’s discretion by amended condition of registration.

Disclosure requirements: Where non-standard restrictions have been imposed on a
New Zealand branch operation, there must be processes in place to ensure branch investors are made aware of this. 39B. Where the New Zealand operations of a dual registration applicant are systemically important to New Zealand, these banks will not be permitted to take retail deposits through the branch operation. Where appropriate, further requirements and restrictions on the bank’s New Zealand operations will be considered by the Reserve Bank on a case-by-case basis. (b) Locally incorporated applicants

Application for registration as a locally incorporated entity may be made by companies
which are in widespread ownership, or which are wholly or substantially owned by corporates, trusts or another bank.
Locally incorporated entities will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that a substantial
proportion of their business will be conducted in and from New Zealand. (c) Other forms of ownership
While the Reserve Bank would not rule out the possibility of entities with other forms of
ownership becoming registered banks, such entities would need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that the degree of separation between ownership and management is sufficient to ensure that checks and balances are adequate and that appropriate incentive structures apply. (III) Size and nature of business or proposed business, or any part of the business or proposed business
A locally incorporated bank will be required to have a minimum of NZD $30 million in
capital. This minimum capital requirement is intended to ensure that an applicant has BS1 December 2016

sufficient substance to carry on business as a registered bank and to demonstrate that the owners have made a reasonable commitment to the business.
44. Branches of overseas banks will not be subject to a minimum size requirement, in
recognition of the fact that a branch will be operating on the basis of the global bank's balance sheet. However, in such cases the Reserve Bank will wish to satisfy itself that the global bank has a level of capital which exceeds NZD $30 million.
45. Restrictions on retail deposit taking will be imposed on some overseas incorporated banks.
(See paragraphs 30 – 36)
46. Overseas incorporated banks which provide inadequate disclosure in their home
jurisdiction or which come from a jurisdiction that has legislation that gives deposits made, or credit conferred, in that jurisdiction a preferential claim in a winding up, will not be permitted to take retail deposits of more than $200 million. (IV) Ability of the applicant to carry on business in a prudent manner
47. In having regard to whether or not an applicant for registration has the ability to carry on
business in a prudent manner, the Reserve Bank is required to confine its consideration to the following matters:
(a) capital in relation to the size and nature of the business; (b) loan concentration and risk exposures; (c) separation of the business from other interests of those who own or control the bank; (d) separation of the business or proposed business from other business; (e) internal controls and accounting systems; (f) risk management systems and policies; (g) arrangements for any business, or functions relating to any business, of the applicant to be carried on by any person other than the applicant (outsourcing); (h) such other matters as may, from time to time, be prescribed in regulations. The following sections expand on items (a) to (h). (a) Capital in relation to size and nature of business
48. An applicant must satisfy the Reserve Bank that it is able, on an ongoing basis, to meet the
capital requirements that would be imposed as conditions of registration. An applicant BS1 December 2016

will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that it has sufficient capital to carry on its business in a prudent manner and that it is able to maintain a prudent level of capital both on a solo and a group basis. 48A. An applicant’s capital requirements must be calculated under one of two broad approaches available under the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework. The first approach is the standardised approach and is set out in the Reserve Bank’s “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A). This approach uses external credit assessments produced by approved credit rating agencies and is the default approach. The second approach permits an applicant’s internal models to be used to measure the risks of their business and is set out in “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Approach)” (BS2B). This second approach is only available to the extent the Reserve Bank accredits the applicant to use the models based approach. 48B. An applicant must have a capital policy. A capital policy must take into account any constraints on access to further capital when needed to cater for situations including, for example, an increase in business or an unexpected loss. In addition, an applicant must satisfy the Reserve Bank that it has the capacity to implement and manage an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the Reserve Bank’s “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process” (BS12).
49. For a locally incorporated bank the capital requirements that would generally be imposed
are set out in the Reserve Bank’s standard conditions of registration in Appendix One. In some cases, however, higher than usual minimum requirements may be imposed to mitigate higher than usual risks.
50. For a branch of a bank incorporated overseas, an applicant will have to demonstrate to the
Reserve Bank that the global bank complies with adequate capital standards, which are at least broadly comparable with those in New Zealand, and that it is subject to adequate supervision by the bank’s home supervisor.
51. An applicant will be required to show that it has the ability to disclose capital adequacy
information on its parent or the global bank.
(b) Loan concentration and risk exposures
52. Banks that do not have a diversified portfolio of risks or do not monitor risks adequately,
are vulnerable to substantial losses. In such cases the bank’s capital can be severely depleted as a result either of the failure of a single customer (or group of related customers) or of problems arising in one particular area of the bank’s business. Therefore, applicants for registration will be required to demonstrate that they will have in place policies and systems which will allow them to monitor and control loan concentrations and risk exposures in a manner which is appropriate for a bank, and that they will be able to comply with the exposure concentration disclosure and director attestation requirements applicable to registered banks.
53. In assessing the appropriateness of policies and systems for controlling loan concentrations
and risk exposures, the Reserve Bank will have regard to the extent to which various aspects of risk will be diversified. BS1 December 2016

(c) Separation from other interests of the owners
54. Boards of banks have an important role to play in ensuring that bank managers are
monitored closely and that they are subject to appropriate disciplines and incentives. The shareholders or owners of a bank play an important role in monitoring the board and in monitoring the bank’s performance. Where there is inadequate separation between a bank's board and its principal shareholders, these incentives and disciplines may be undermined.
55. Where the applicant is a branch of an overseas bank, the local operations are legally part of
the operations of the global bank. Consequently, it is not meaningful to attempt to impose a degree of separation between the two. Therefore a branch will not be required to comply with the separation arrangements that apply to locally incorporated banks.
56. Where the applicant is a locally incorporated company, the applicant will be required to
satisfy the Reserve Bank that there will be sufficient separation between the bank and its owners. Generally this will require:

that the proposed bank has in place policies to monitor and limit exposures to related
parties;
that the company’s constitution does not include any provision permitting a director
to act other than in the best interests of the company (i.e. the bank); and
that the composition of the board is such that it does not give rise to concerns about
the bank's ability to pursue its own interests when these conflict with those of the shareholders.

Specific requirements on board size and composition for registered banks are set out in the
Reserve Bank document “Corporate Governance” (BS14). An applicant for registration must normally meet the following minimum requirements:

The board of the proposed bank must have at least five members, of whom the
majority must be non-executive, and at least half must be independent (as defined in BS14). Any alternates of non-executive directors must be also non-executive, and any alternates of independent directors must also be independent. At least half of the independent directors on the board must be ordinarily resident in New Zealand. In the case where the applicant’s operations or proposed operations in New Zealand are very small, these conditions on the minimum board size and composition may be varied.
The chairperson of the applicant’s board must be an independent director. The
Reserve Bank may consider a variation to the standard criteria for independence in this case, to allow the chairperson to be a member of a parent company board and still qualify as independent, provided that the applicant is able to satisfy the Reserve Bank that the chairperson will be sufficiently independent from the parent bank in practice.
The board must have an audit committee, or other committee however named that
fulfils the role of an audit committee. It must have at least three members, all of whom must be non-executive directors. The majority of the members of the committee, including its chairperson, must also be independent directors. BS1 December 2016

These requirements are aimed at providing a degree of objective scrutiny of:

exposures to the parent or other related parties;
exposures to unrelated parties undertaken at the request of the parent;
any other matters where the interests of the bank and parent, or the interests of the
bank and management, could potentially conflict.
In some circumstances, it may be necessary to impose additional requirements in order to achieve this.

Locally incorporated applicants will also need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they will be
in a position to comply with a condition of registration which limits aggregate credit exposures of a non-capital nature to connected parties under a ratings-contingent limit methodology, as outlined in the Reserve Bank document “Connected Exposures Policy” (BS8). The standard condition provides that the upper limit is 75 percent of tier one capital for banks rated AA/Aa2 and above, with the limit declining progressively based on a rating scale to 15% of tier one capital for banks rated BBB+/Baa1 and below. Within the rating-contingent limit, aggregate credit exposures of a non-capital nature to non-bank connected parties must not exceed 15 percent of tier one capital. For the purposes of this requirement, exposures to non-bank entities owned by a parent bank are treated as bank exposures. Exposures to connected persons of a capital nature are required to be deducted from tier one capital. The Reserve Bank may impose additional or bank specific conditions of registration where special circumstances apply. For example, the Bank may consider it appropriate to impose a lower than normal connected lending limit on a bank that is undercapitalised relative to the levels of risk it is facing, but which is not in a position to raise additional capital.
Connected exposures within these ratings-contingent limits are required to be calculated
on a gross basis, except where netting is allowed. Where netting is used, credit exposures to connected persons can be calculated on a bilateral net basis, but subject to an additional limit on the aggregate gross exposures of the banking group to connected persons. Aggregate gross exposure to connected persons must not exceed 125% of the banking group’s tier one capital, i.e. the gross amount of exposures that have been netted plus the unnetted exposures. The balance of connected exposures after netting is capped at the applicable ratings-contingent limit. (d) Separation of the business or proposed business from other business
New Zealand’s banking supervision framework is premised on the basis that banks’
business activities are largely confined to “traditional” banking activities, ie to the activities of borrowing and lending, and to the provision of treasury and payments services, and related financial services. Were material insurance underwriting activities or non financial activities to be conducted by banking groups, the accuracy and integrity of capital adequacy measures, and the meaningfulness and comparability of disclosures would be materially degraded.
Where the applicant is a locally incorporated company, the applicant will need to satisfy
the Reserve Bank that it will be in a position to comply with conditions of registration:
BS1
December 2016

that restrict the conduct of life and general insurance business of an underwriting
nature to no more than 1% of a banking group’s total consolidated assets (this condition does not restrict the marketing or distribution of insurance products by a banking group), and
that prohibit the conduct of any non-financial activities that in aggregate are
material relative to the total activities of the banking group.

These conditions of registration will normally apply to the New Zealand banking
groups of overseas incorporated banks as well.
(e) Internal controls and accounting systems
Applicants will be required to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they have, or will have,
internal controls and accounting systems that are appropriate for a registered bank and for the type of business to be conducted. Where the applicant is a branch or subsidiary of a major international bank of standing and repute and is intending to adopt the systems and controls used by the parent, this may be accepted as evidence that this requirement can be met. Similarly, where a financial institution has been operating successfully for some time, this may be accepted as evidence of its ability to meet this requirement.
Where the applicant intends to operate in areas where it lacks experience or where there
are doubts about the adequacy of internal controls and accounting systems, the applicant will need to satisfy the Bank that it has, or will have, appropriate systems and controls. This may require that the applicant obtains a report on the adequacy of systems and controls from an independent party such as an auditor. Directors will be required to attest to the adequacy of systems to monitor and control material business risks in disclosure statements. In such cases, the Bank may also take into account arrangements designed to mitigate risks arising from unproven systems and controls, including capital adequacy policies. The Reserve Bank may impose higher minimum capital requirements by way of condition of registration in order to mitigate any increased risk, where individual circumstances warrant. (f) Risk management systems and policies
Applicants will be required to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they have, or will have, risk
management systems and policies that are appropriate for a registered bank and for the type of business to be conducted. An applicant’s situation as a branch or subsidiary of a major international bank of standing and repute and intention to adopt the systems and policies used by the parent may be accepted as evidence that the requirement can be met. Similarly, a financial institution’s successful operation for some time may be accepted as evidence of ability to meet the requirement.
If the applicant intends to operate in areas where it lacks experience or if there are
doubts about the adequacy of its risk management systems and policies, the Reserve Bank may require the applicant to obtain a report from an independent expert on the adequacy of its risk management systems and policies, and to supply that report to the Reserve Bank. In such cases, the Bank may also take into account arrangements designed to mitigate risk arising from unproven systems and controls or other factors, including BS1 December 2016

adequacy of capital in light of these risks. The Reserve Bank may impose higher capital adequacy ratio requirements by way of a condition of registration in order to mitigate any increased risk where individual circumstances warrant. 66A. In relation to liquidity risk, the applicant will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that it will be able to comply with conditions of registration imposing minimum requirements on the applicant’s liquidity risk management framework, as set out in the Reserve Bank document “Liquidity Policy” (BS13).
67. If the application for registration is successful, the registered bank’s directors will be
required regularly to attest in disclosure statements to the adequacy of the registered bank’s systems to monitor and control material business risks. (g) Outsourcing
68. Outsourcing can have a positive impact on a bank’s efficiency, risk management and
profitability and may allow it to access specialist expertise not available from within its own ranks. On the other hand, it can also increase the risk and possible magnitude of damage to the financial system in the event that the bank, or a service provider to the bank, should fail or become dysfunctional.
69. Where relevant, applicants for registration will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that
they will be able to comply with the Reserve Bank’s outsourcing policy which is described in the Reserve Bank document “Outsourcing Policy” (BS11).
70. Applicants for registration whose New Zealand liabilities, net of amounts due to related
parties, exceed NZD $10 billion will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they have the legal and practical ability to control and execute any business, and any functions relating to any business, of the applicant that are carried on by a person other than the applicant, sufficient to achieve, under normal business conditions and in the event of stress or failure of the applicant or of a service provider to the applicant, the following outcomes:
(a) that the applicant’s clearing and settlement obligations due on a day can be met on that day; (b) that the applicant’s financial risk positions on a day can be identified on that day; (c) that the applicant’s financial risk positions can be monitored and managed on the day following any failure and on subsequent days; and (d) that the applicant’s existing customers can be given access to payments facilities on the day following any failure and on subsequent days.
71. Such applicants will also need to satisfy the Reserve Bank:
(a) that the business and affairs of the applicant are managed by, or under the direction or supervision of, the board of the applicant; BS1 December 2016

(b) that the employment contract of the chief executive officer of the applicant or person in an equivalent position (together “CEO”) is with the applicant, and the terms and conditions of the CEO’s employment agreement are determined by, and any decisions relating to the employment or termination of employment of the CEO are made by, the board of the applicant; and (c) that all staff employed by the applicant have their remuneration determined by (or under the delegated authority of) the board or the CEO of the applicant and are accountable (directly or indirectly) to the CEO of the applicant. (h) Such other matters as may, from time to time, be prescribed in regulations 71A Currently there is one matter prescribed in regulation. This matter is policies, systems, and procedures to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing. 71B. Applicants will be required to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they have, or will have, policies, systems and procedures, to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing that are consistent with the Reserve Bank’s “Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism” (BS5). (V) Suitability for their positions of the directors and senior managers
72. The Reserve Bank will have regard to the suitability of the applicant’s proposed directors
and senior management for their positions. The standard considerations are:
(a) Integrity. The Reserve Bank will assess the integrity of directors and senior managers by— (i) seeking the views of foreign banking regulators where the person has been resident in a foreign country and has been subject to a suitability check by the foreign regulator; and (ii) reviewing the New Zealand criminal record information of the person where they have been resident in New Zealand. (iii) reviewing the criminal record information of the person in other jurisdictions in which the person has been resident, where necessary. (b) Skills and experience. The applicant will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that key executives have suitable expertise and experience to manage a registered bank, that the bank’s board collectively has the range of experience and skills to govern a registered bank, and that the directors and senior managers have sufficient skills and experience in the activities that the applicant proposes to undertake. Because it is impractical for each director individually to be an expert in all relevant areas, the skills and experience of directors will be assessed collectively. This evaluation of skills and experience will involve reviewing directors’ and senior managers’ curricula vitae.
73. The Reserve Bank may take into consideration other information if relevant.
BS1
December 2016

If a proposed director or senior manager has already passed a foreign banking regulator’s
suitability assessment, the Reserve Bank will usually accept that assessment as evidence of suitability.
‘Senior managers’ are defined as the chief executive officer and executives accountable
directly to the chief executive officer for locally incorporated banks, and the New Zealand chief executive officer for overseas incorporated banks.
The Reserve Bank does some basic checks on whether or not there is any evidence to
suggest that proposed directors or senior managers are not suitable for their positions, but does not give a positive affirmation of suitability. The primary responsibility for ensuring that appointees have the requisite skills, experience, and integrity to carry out their tasks successfully lies with the shareholders (for director appointments) and with the board (for senior management appointments), not with the Reserve Bank. (VI) Standing of the applicant in financial markets
An applicant’s status as a branch or subsidiary of a major international bank of standing
and repute with a record of sound performance will normally be accepted as evidence of an appropriate degree of standing.
When the applicant is not a branch or subsidiary of a reputable bank, additional
emphasis will be placed on the suitability of directors and senior management for their positions (see section C(V)) in assessing the standing of the applicant in financial markets.
All applicants must obtain a credit rating before registration. This is to assist the
Reserve Bank in assessing the applicant’s standing and to ensure that the applicant is in a position to include a rating in their initial disclosure statement.
Applicants must obtain their credit rating from a rating agency approved by the Reserve
Bank for the purposes of section 80 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. These agencies are Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service. Applicants may only use another rating agency with the agreement of the Reserve Bank. In such cases, the Reserve Bank must first be satisfied that the rating agency meets the criteria set out in Appendix Three. BS1 December 2016

(VII) Standing of the owner of the applicant in financial markets
81. The standing of the owner of the applicant in financial markets is likely to have a
significant impact on the standing of the applicant itself.
82. Where an applicant is owned by a major international bank of standing and repute, it is
likely that the Reserve Bank will accept this as evidence that the applicant has an appropriate level of standing for a registered bank.
83. Where the applicant is a subsidiary or branch of an overseas bank, the Reserve Bank will
seek the views of the parent supervisor before determining the application for registration.
84. In all cases, the Reserve Bank will take into consideration any impediments to the raising
of further capital which arise as a result of the standing of the owner and the applicant's ownership structure. (VIII) For an overseas applicant, the law and regulatory requirements of the home jurisdiction relating to:

the recognition and priorities of claims of creditors or classes of creditors in the event
of the insolvency of the applicant;
the disclosure of financial and other information;
applicable accounting and auditing standards;
duties and powers of directors;
licensing, registration authorisation and supervision.

Where an applicant is incorporated overseas, the Reserve Bank will have regard to any
aspects of the law and regulatory requirements in that country which could impact adversely on the operation of the applicant's business in New Zealand. These will be weighed against the benefits to be derived from the applicant's presence in the local market. If necessary, the applicant will be required to incorporate locally or will be made subject to a condition of registration limiting its ability to take retail deposits, in order to provide some degree of insulation from the effects of foreign laws and regulations, or of licensing arrangements in the home jurisdiction. (See Paras 19 – 42 for more information.) (IX) For an overseas applicant, the nature and extent of financial and other information disclosed to the public
Applicants which do not disclose sufficient information to the public will either be
required to incorporate locally or alternatively will be made subject to a condition of registration limiting their ability to take retail deposits in New Zealand. (See Paras 30 – 36 for more information.) BS1 December 2016

(X) For a subsidiary of an overseas person, the law and regulatory requirements of the overseas person’s home jurisdiction relating to:

the disclosure of financial and other information;
applicable accounting and auditing standards;
duties and powers of the directors; and
licensing, registration, authorisation and supervision in the home jurisdiction.

In assessing an application for registration, the Reserve Bank will take into account any
aspects of the law and regulatory requirements relating to bank licensing, supervision or disclosure of information in the home jurisdiction of an applicant’s parent company which could impact adversely on a subsidiary’s operations in New Zealand. (XI) For a subsidiary of an overseas person, the extent of financial and other information disclosed to the public
Where relevant the Reserve Bank will take into account the nature and extent of disclosure
made by the parent company of an applicant and any impact this would have on the ability of a New Zealand customer of the subsidiary bank to assess the financial position of that bank. (XII) Disclosure
The Reserve Bank will require an applicant to publish an initial disclosure statement so
that there is no lag between the time the applicant commences business as a bank and the time appropriate information is made available to customers and potential customers. The information to be provided in an initial disclosure statement will be the same as that required in a normal full year disclosure statement. The Reserve Bank specifies the balance date for the initial disclosure statement, which may be a date before the applicant is registered as a registered bank, and also specifies the accounting period to be covered by the initial disclosure statement. (XIII) Money laundering
[Now addressed in paragraphs 71A and 71B above.]
(XIV) General
All bank registrations will be made subject to conditions. These conditions of registration
are designed to ensure that banks comply with minimum prudential requirements on an ongoing basis.
See Section E for details of the conditions of registration which registered banks are
required to meet.
BS1
December 2016

D. SUPERVISION
93. To the extent possible, the Reserve Bank's system of supervision draws on and enhances
the market disciplines which are naturally present in the financial system.
94. As a consequence, the Reserve Bank's system of supervision places considerable emphasis
on a requirement that banks disclose on a quarterly basis, information on financial performance and risk positions, and on a requirement that directors, and in the case of an overseas incorporated registered bank, its New Zealand chief executive officer, regularly attest to certain key matters. These measures are designed to strengthen market disciplines and to ensure that responsibility for the prudent management of banks lies with those who are best placed to exercise that responsibility, the directors and management.
95. The main elements of the Reserve Bank's supervisory role are as follows:
(i) The Reserve Bank administers disclosure and director attestation requirements for registered banks. (ii) All banks are required to comply with minimum prudential requirements applied through conditions of registration. These include constraints on connected exposure, minimum capital adequacy requirements, and minimum standards for liquidity risk management. (iii) The Reserve Bank monitors each registered bank's financial condition and compliance with conditions of registration, principally by analysing published disclosure statements and prudential returns that are regularly provided to the Bank. This monitoring is intended to ensure that the Reserve Bank maintains familiarity with the financial condition of each bank and the banking system as a whole, and maintains a state of preparedness to invoke crisis management powers should this be necessary. (iv) In this context, the Reserve Bank meets to discuss matters of prudential interest with the senior management of banks on a regular basis. (v) The Reserve Bank carries out basic pre-appointment suitability checks on proposed directors or senior managers, including a review of the applicant’s CV, criminal record checks and checks with other relevant regulators. However, primary responsibility for ensuring that appointees have the requisite skills and integrity to carry out their tasks successfully lies with the shareholders (for director appointments) and with the board (for senior management appointments). (va) The Reserve Bank is able to issue guidelines for banks under section 78(3) of the Act. The Act provides for guidelines to be issued for the purposes interpreting the matters the Reserve Bank may consider when having regard to whether a bank is carrying on business in a prudent manner. These matters are set out in paragraph 47 of this document. BS1 December 2016

(vb) The Reserve Bank “Guidelines on Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism” (BS5) were issued under section 78(3) of the Act. The Reserve Bank expects banks to have policies, systems and procedures, to detect and deter money laundering and terrorist financing that are consistent with these guidelines. (vc) The Reserve Bank “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Process (“ICAAP”)” (BS12) were issued under section 78(3) of the Act. These guidelines apply to any New Zealand-incorporated registered bank that is subject to a condition of registration requiring it to have an ICAAP, and provide guidance on how a bank should establish, operate and maintain its ICAAP. (vd) Section D.2 of the Reserve Bank document “Liquidity Policy” (BS13) contains guidelines issued under section 78(3) of the Act. These guidelines cover the factors that a registered bank should consider when deciding on its arrangements for liquidity-risk management, subject to their relevance given the nature of the bank’s business and risks. (ve) Part 3 of the Reserve Bank document “Corporate Governance” (BS14) contains guidelines issued under section 78(3) of the Act. These guidelines address the skills, experience and personal qualities of the individual directors of a registered bank in relation to the board’s ability collectively to exercise effective governance of the bank. (vi) The Bank may make use of the powers it has under sections 93, 94, and 95 of the Act:

Section 93 allows the Reserve Bank to obtain information, data and forecasts
from registered banks.
Section 94 allows the Reserve Bank to require a registered bank to obtain an
audit, by an auditor approved by the Reserve Bank, of any information required to be supplied under section 93.
Section 95 empowers the Reserve Bank to require a registered bank to supply
it with a one or more reports prepared by a person approved by the Bank on:
(a) the corporate matters of the registered bank; (b) the financial matters of the registered bank; (c) the prudential matters of the registered bank; (d) any other matters relating to the business, operation or management of the registered bank; (e) any of the above matters in relation to any associated person of the registered bank, a body incorporated in New Zealand or an overseas company registered under section 337 of the Companies Act 1993 in which a holding company of the registered bank has a substantial interest. The Reserve Bank may require a report obtained under section 95 to be published in a specified form. BS1 December 2016

(vii) The Bank will use the crisis management powers available to it under the Reserve Bank Act to intervene where a bank distress or failure situation threatens the soundness of the financial system. (viii) The Bank maintains close working relationships with parent bank supervisors on bank-specific issues, policy issues and general matters relating to the condition of the financial system in New Zealand and in the countries where parent banks are domiciled. Where New Zealand domiciled banks have branches or subsidiaries in overseas jurisdictions similar arrangements will apply in respect of host supervisors. E. CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION
96. Section 74 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 permits the Reserve Bank to
impose conditions on a bank’s registration.
97. Standard conditions of registration are set out in Appendix One. These should be treated
as indicative of the conditions that could apply to any particular bank at a particular time. Although the Reserve Bank uses the standard conditions as far as practicable, in some circumstances different or additional conditions may be imposed to recognise, for example, specific banking group structures or risks. 97A. Further, the standard conditions include two mechanisms to implement the Reserve Bank’s macro-prudential toolkit. Hence the actual conditions applying to an individual bank at a point in time depend on whether the Reserve Bank has deployed one of those tools. For locally incorporated banks, the Reserve Bank may implement the countercyclical buffer if it judges that there is a build up of system-wide risk (see paragraphs 102C-D). For both locally incorporated banks and overseas incorporated banks the standard conditions include five conditions restricting high loan-to-valuation ratio (LVR) residential mortgage lending. The Reserve Bank may impose these conditions from time to time across all banks, when it judges that factors such as rapid price rises and loosening credit standards in the housing market are leading to a build-up of system-wide risk. The decisions to impose these conditions, and subsequently to vary or remove them, are taken within the framework set out in the Reserve Bank’s Memorandum of Understanding on macro-prudential policy.
98. A bank’s actual conditions of registration must be made publicly available in the bank’s
disclosure statements: the full year disclosure statement must include the full set of conditions that applied at the balance date, and other disclosure statements must report any changes in the conditions between the reporting dates of the current and the previous disclosure statement. This requirement is intended to help enhance public understanding of the requirements of registration. Moreover, directors must also attest to the bank’s compliance with its conditions of registration each quarter. For an overseas incorporated registered bank, this attestation must also be made by the New Zealand chief executive officer. The attestation requirements are designed to reinforce the responsibility of directors for ensuring a bank complies with its conditions of registration. BS1 December 2016

99. The Reserve Bank may consider and have regard to the whole of this Statement of
Principles when imposing a condition of registration (whether on registration or subsequently).
100. The banking group will normally be defined in the conditions of registration as the
financial reporting group for the registered bank, although the Reserve Bank may agree to, or require, the inclusion or exclusion of any entity or part of any entity.
101. In addition to the requirements imposed on a bank in relation to its banking group,
requirements may also be imposed on the bank on a solo (i.e. stand alone) basis. For example, a solo capital requirement could be imposed to counter double gearing. (I) Locally incorporated banks 102A. Under a bank’s conditions of registration capital requirements may be determined under one of two possible approaches: the standardised approach or the internal models based approach. The internal models based approach only applies to the extent the Reserve Bank accredits a bank to use it. The details of these approaches are set out in the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework: in documents BS2A for the standardised approach and BS2B for the internal models based approach. 102B. Locally-incorporated banks are subject to minimum capital requirements as set out in their conditions of registration. These requirements take the form of minimum capital ratios (i.e. capital as a percentage of risk-weighted assets). In addition to minimum capital requirements, a locally-incorporated bank is required to restrict the distribution of its earnings if its buffer ratio falls below a defined level (the buffer ratio is a capital buffer over and above the minimum capital ratio requirements). 102C. The buffer ratio comprises a conservation buffer of common equity designed so that banks can absorb losses during periods of financial and economic stress without breaching the minimum capital ratio requirements, and also potentially a countercyclical buffer of common equity to accommodate a system-wide build up of risk. 102D. The conservation buffer applies at all times and is set at 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. However, the countercyclical buffer will only be deployed when the Reserve Bank judges that excess private sector credit growth or rapid growth in asset prices is leading to a build-up of system-wide risk. For the purposes of a bank’s conditions of registration, the countercyclical capital buffer is treated as an extension of the conservation buffer and a single buffer ratio is applied. 102E. A locally-incorporated registered bank must have an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the Reserve Bank’s “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process” (BS12).
103. Appendix One sets out standard conditions of registration for locally incorporated banks.
A locally incorporated bank will normally be subject to these conditions, with the exception of the conditions relating to macro-prudential tools (see paragraph 97A) that will only be deployed at particular points in time. These conditions are:
BS1
December 2016

That the banking group does not conduct any non-financial activities that in aggregate
are material relative to its total activities.
That the banking group’s insurance business is not greater than 1% of its total
consolidated assets.
That the capital of the banking group is not less than NZD $30 million.
That the banking group has a Total capital ratio of at least 8%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of
at least 6%, and a Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 4.5%, measured in accordance with the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework in BS2A or BS2B.
That from 1 January 2014, if the buffer ratio of the banking group is at or below the
level set in the registered bank’s condition of registration (normally 2.5% unless the counter-cyclical buffer is deployed), the bank must limit distributions of earnings (in the manner specified); prepare a capital plan to restore the banking group’s buffer ratio including, if applicable, the timeframe determined by the Reserve Bank for restoring the buffer ratio; and have the capital plan approved by the Reserve Bank.
That the bank has an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that
accords with the “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process” (BS12), which identifies and measures the “other material risks” not captured in the calculation of the bank’s total capital ratio and tier 1 capital ratio for the banking group.
That the aggregate credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of any allowances
for impairment) of the banking group to all connected persons do not exceed the rating-contingent limit determined in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Connected Exposures Policy” (BS8). The purpose of this condition of registration is to ensure that the owner of a bank does not effectively decapitalise the bank, thereby undermining the incentives which would normally apply where an owner has committed capital to a subsidiary. It also places an upper bound on the extent to which a bank can be directed to lend to a parent or the interests of a parent.
That exposures to connected persons must not be on more favourable terms (e.g. as
relates to such matters as credit assessment, tenor, interest rates, amortisation schedules and requirement for collateral) than corresponding exposures to nonconnected persons.
That the bank’s board has at least five directors, of whom a majority are nonexecutive, and at least half are independent (as defined in BS14). Any person who
may act as an alternate director in place of an independent director must also be independent, and any person who may act as an alternate director in place of a nonexecutive director must also be non-executive.
That at least half of the bank’s independent directors must be ordinarily resident in
New Zealand.
BS1
December 2016
That the chairperson of the board of the bank is independent.
That the bank’s constitution does not include any provision permitting a director,
when exercising powers or performing duties as a director, to act other than in what he or she believes is the best interests of the company (i.e. the bank).
That no appointment of any director, chief executive officer, or executive who reports
or is accountable directly to the chief executive officer, shall be made unless:
(i) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (ii) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment. The Reserve Bank will make a decision on whether or not to object to a particular appointment if basic suitability checks (a review of the applicant’s curriculum vitae, criminal record checks and checks with other relevant regulators) produce any evidence that the applicant is clearly unsuitable for the position. Primary responsibility for ensuring that appointees have the requisite skills, experience and integrity to carry out their jobs lies with the shareholders (for director appointments) and with the board (for senior management appointments) not the Reserve Bank. See BS10 for further details.
That a person must not be appointed as chairperson of the board of the registered bank
unless:
(i) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (ii) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment. If a person proposed to be appointed as chairperson will not meet the standard criteria for independence set out in BS14 because he or she is currently, or is proposed to be, a member of the board of a holding company of the bank, the Reserve Bank will decide whether the person can nevertheless be treated as independent on the basis of his or her experience and current situation.
That the bank has an audit committee or other committee whose mandate includes
audit matters. The committee must have at least three members, all of whom are nonexecutive directors of the bank, and the majority of whom are independent. The chair of the committee must be an independent director of the bank and must not be the chair of the bank.
That a substantial proportion of the bank’s business is conducted in and from New
Zealand.
That the banking group maintains one week and one month liquidity mismatch ratios
of at least zero percent, and a one year core funding ratio of at least 75%, at the end of each business day. The calculations and definitions for these ratios are set out in “Liquidity Policy” (BS13) and “Liquidity Policy Annex: Liquid Assets” (BS13A).
That the bank has an internal framework for liquidity risk management that is
adequate in the registered bank’s view for managing the bank’s liquidity risk at a BS1 December 2016

prudent level, and satisfies in particular the four high-level principles set out in
Section D.1 of BS13.
In determining its internal arrangements for managing liquidity risk, the bank should consider the guidelines on liquidity risk management given in Section D.2 of BS13, as appropriate to the nature of its business and risks.

That the value of the banking group’s assets encumbered for the benefit of covered
bond holders is no more than 10% of the total.
That no member of the banking group may give effect to a qualifying acquisition or
business combination that is above the “notification threshold” unless the registered bank has given the Reserve Bank notice in writing of the intended acquisition or business combination, accompanied by specified information, and—
in the case where the proposed transaction is below the “non-objection
threshold”, at least 10 days have passed; or
in the case where the proposed transaction is above the “non-objection
threshold”, the Reserve Bank has given the registered bank a notice of nonobjection. The definitions of “qualifying acquisition or business combination”, “notification threshold” and “non-objection threshold”, and the information requirements, are set out in “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15). The following five conditions will only apply when the Reserve Bank has decided to use the LVR tool in accordance with the macro-prudential framework. When that happens, they will normally be applied to all locally-incorporated banks, with exclusions only in very exceptional cases, such as a bank being prohibited from undertaking residential mortgage lending. Note that the figures set out below are purely illustrative, and should not be taken as an indication of what the Reserve Bank would impose in any particular circumstance:
That, for a loan-to-valuation measurement period, the total of the registered bank’s
qualifying new mortgage lending amounts must not:
(a) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [90%], exceed [5%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period; and (b) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [80%], exceed [12%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period.
That the registered bank must not make a residential mortgage loan unless the
terms and conditions of the loan or of the associated mortgage require that the borrower obtain the bank’s agreement before granting to another person a charge over the residential property used as security for the loan. BS1 December 2016
That the registered bank must not permit a borrower to grant a charge in favour of
another person over a residential property used as security for a residential mortgage loan, unless the sum of the lending secured by the charge and the loan value for the residential mortgage loan would not exceed [80%] of the value of the residential property when the lending secured by the charge is drawn down.
That the registered bank must not provide a residential mortgage loan if the
property to be mortgaged as security for the loan is subject to a charge in favour of another person, unless the total amount of credit secured by the residential property would not exceed [80%] of the property value when the residential mortgage loan is drawn down.
That the registered bank must not act as broker or arrange for a member of its
banking group to provide a residential mortgage loan.
Defined terms for these five conditions are set out in “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19). The “loan-to-valuation measurement period” is normally three months for banks with higher mortgage lending amounts and six months for banks with lower mortgage lending amounts, on a rolling monthly basis. “Qualifying new mortgage lending amounts” are the values of new mortgage loans or increases in mortgage loans for which firm commitments fall within the period, plus other increases in existing mortgage loans over the period. BS19 specifies certain classes of new mortgage commitment that may be exempted from the measurement. The number and nature of the restrictions in the first condition will vary according to their desired impact at the time that they are imposed. (IA) Locally incorporated banks whose New Zealand liabilities, net of amounts due to related parties, exceed $10 billion

In addition to the conditions of registration that normally apply to all locally
incorporated banks, locally incorporated banks whose New Zealand liabilities, net of amounts due to related parties, exceed NZD $10 billion will normally be subject to conditions of registration (see Appendix One for the standard conditions of registration):

that the registered bank has legal and practical ability to control and execute any
business, and any functions relating to any business, of the bank that are carried on by a person other than the bank, sufficient to achieve, under normal business conditions and in the event of stress or failure of the bank or of a service provider to the bank, the following outcomes:
(a) that the bank’s clearing and settlement obligations due on a day can be met on that day; (b) that the bank’s financial risk positions on a day can be identified on that day; (c) that the bank’s financial risk positions can be monitored and managed on the day following any failure and on subsequent days; and BS1 December 2016

(d) that the bank’s existing customers can be given access to payments facilities on the day following any failure and on subsequent days.

that the business and affairs of the bank are managed by, or under the direction or
supervision of, the board of the bank;
that the employment contract of the chief executive officer of the bank or person in
an equivalent position (together “CEO”) is with the bank, and the terms and conditions of the CEO’s employment agreement are determined by, and any decisions relating to the employment or termination of employment of the CEO are made by, the board of the bank; and
that all staff employed by the bank have their remuneration determined by (or under
the delegated authority of) the board or the CEO of the bank and are accountable (directly or indirectly) to the CEO of the bank. (IB) Locally incorporated banks whose retail deposits exceed $1 billion

In addition to the conditions of registration that normally apply to all locally
incorporated banks, locally incorporated banks whose retail deposits exceed NZD $1 billion will normally be subject to conditions of registration:

that the registered bank is pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution and in
accordance with a direction from the Reserve Bank, the registered bank can:
(a) close promptly at any time of the day and on any day of the week and that effective upon the appointment of the statutory manager – (i) all liabilities are frozen in full; and (ii) no further access by customers and counterparties to their accounts (deposits, liabilities or other obligations) is possible; (b) apply a de minimis to relevant customer liability accounts; (c) apply a partial freeze to the customer liability account balances; (d) reopen by no later than 9am the next business day following the appointment of a statutory manager and provide customers access to their unfrozen funds; (e) maintain a full freeze on liabilities not pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution; and (f) reinstate customers’ access to some or all of their residual frozen funds.
that the registered bank has an Implementation Plan that—
BS1
December 2016

(a) is up-to-date; and
(b) demonstrates that the registered bank’s prepositioning for Open Bank Resolution meets the requirements set out in the Reserve Bank document:
“Open Bank Resolution Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS 17).

that the registered bank has a compendium of liabilities that—
(a) at the product-class level lists all liabilities, indicating which are— (i) pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution; and (ii) not pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution; (b) is agreed to by the Reserve Bank; and (c) if the Reserve Bank’s agreement is conditional, meets the Reserve Bank’s conditions.
that on an annual basis the registered bank tests all the component parts of its Open
Bank Resolution solution that demonstrates the registered bank’s prepositioning for Open Bank Resolution as specified in their Implementation Plan. (II) Banks incorporated overseas

Standard conditions of registration for banks incorporated overseas are set out in Appendix
One. In this context “registered bank” refers to the overseas incorporated bank as a legal entity (that is, the whole bank). References to the business, or to particular aspects of the business, “of the registered bank in New Zealand” normally refer to activities of the New Zealand branch that are required to be reported in financial statements by New Zealand financial reporting standards: this is specified in standard definitions in the conditions of registration, which may be varied in particular circumstances. “Banking group”, which is also defined in the conditions of registration, normally refers to the New Zealand business of the bank and its subsidiaries, as described in section 461B(2) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (or in section 9(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993 if the bank is still subject to that Act). The conditions are:

That the banking group does not conduct any non-financial activities that in
aggregate are material relative to its total activities.
That the banking group’s insurance business is not greater than 1% of its total
consolidated assets.
That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand does not constitute a
predominant proportion of the total business of the registered bank.
That no appointment to the position of the New Zealand chief executive officer of
the registered bank shall be made unless:
BS1
December 2016

(i) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (ii) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment.

That the registered bank complies with the minimum capital adequacy requirements
applied by the home country supervisor. Normally this will require that the bank complies with at least the Basel minima (ie a Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of not less than 4.5% of risk weighted assets, a Tier 1 capital ratio of not less than 6% of risk weighted assets, and a Total capital ratio of not less than 8% of risk weighted assets).
That the registered bank complies with the requirements imposed by the home
supervisor.
That liabilities of the registered bank in New Zealand, net of amounts due to related
parties (including amounts due to a subsidiary or affiliate of the registered bank), do not exceed NZ$15 billion.
That the registered bank has an internal framework for liquidity risk management that
is adequate in the registered bank’s view for managing the bank’s liquidity risk at a prudent level, and satisfies in particular the four high-level principles set out in
Section D.1 of BS13.
In determining its internal arrangements for managing liquidity risk, the bank should consider the guidelines on liquidity risk management given in Section D.2 of BS13, as appropriate to the nature of its business and risks. A branch will also normally be subject to a condition of registration requiring it to meet specified minimum quantitative requirements for liquidity risk. However, the Reserve Bank will adapt the standard locally-incorporated bank requirements to branches on a case-by-case basis, taking into account a number of factors which are set out in Section B.1 of BS13. The following five conditions will only apply when the Reserve Bank has decided to use the LVR tool in accordance with the macro-prudential framework. When that happens, they will normally be applied to all overseas-incorporated banks, with exclusions only in very exceptional cases, such as a bank being prohibited from undertaking residential mortgage lending. Note that the figures set out below are purely illustrative, and should not be taken as an indication of what the Reserve Bank would impose in any particular circumstance:
That, for a loan-to-valuation measurement period, the total of business of the
registered bank in New Zealand’s qualifying new mortgage lending amounts must not:
(a) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [90%], exceed [5%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period; and BS1 December 2016

(b) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [80%], exceed [12%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period.

That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not make a
residential mortgage loan unless the terms and conditions of the loan or of the associated mortgage require that the borrower obtain the bank’s agreement before granting to another person a charge over the residential property used as security for the loan.
That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not permit a
borrower to grant a charge in favour of another person over a residential property used as security for a residential mortgage loan, unless the sum of the lending secured by the charge and the loan value for the residential mortgage loan would not exceed [80%] of the value of the residential property when the lending secured by the charge is drawn down.
That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not provide a
residential mortgage loan if the property to be mortgaged as security for the loan is subject to a charge in favour of another person, unless the total amount of credit secured by the residential property would not exceed [80%] of the property value when the residential mortgage loan is drawn down.
That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not—
(a) act as broker or arrange a residential mortgage loan for the business of the registered bank outside New Zealand or for an associated person of the registered bank outside New Zealand; or (b) facilitate the drawdown of a residential mortgage loan the registered bank originated as part of its business outside New Zealand or by an associated person of the registered bank outside New Zealand without notifying the Reserve Bank of this activity in the manner and form specified by the Reserve Bank. Defined terms for these five conditions are set out in “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19). The “loan-to-valuation measurement period” is normally three months for banks with higher mortgage lending amounts and six months for banks with lower mortgage lending amounts, on a rolling monthly basis. “Qualifying new mortgage lending amounts” are the values of new mortgage loans or increases in mortgage loans for which firm commitments fall within the period, plus other increases in existing mortgage loans over the period. BS19 specifies certain classes of new mortgage commitment that may be exempted from the measurement. The number and nature of the restrictions in the first condition will vary according to their desired impact at the time that they are imposed. The following condition will apply only to banks which are incorporated in jurisdictions which have legislation which gives deposits made, or credit conferred, in that jurisdiction a preferential claim in a winding up or which do not provide adequate disclosure in the home jurisdiction:
BS1
December 2016
That retail deposits of the registered bank in New Zealand do not exceed $200
million. For the purposes of this condition retail deposits are defined as deposits by natural persons, excluding deposits with an outstanding balance which exceeds $250,000. F. VARIATION AND REMOVAL OF CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION

Section 74 of the Act gives the Reserve Bank power to vary, add to, or remove conditions
of registration. In general, the Reserve Bank will vary, add to, substitute or remove conditions of registration when there is a change in supervision policy that must be effected by way of a change in conditions of registration or by removal of an existing condition. The Reserve Bank may also vary, add to, substitute or remove conditions of registration where the circumstances of a bank have changed or when the Reserve Bank otherwise considers it necessary in relation to its section 68 objectives (refer para 4). For example, a variation may be required in order to mitigate risk with respect to a registered bank’s internal controls or risk management systems. 107A. Consistent with the Reserve Bank’s objectives under section 68, the Reserve Bank may also withdraw one of the policy tools of the macro-prudential framework, or adjust its settings, by varying or removing conditions of registration that have previously been imposed or varied to deploy that tool. The intention is to use these tools only for temporary periods, depending on the level of system-wide risk in the financial system. The Reserve Bank may for instance remove restrictions previously imposed on high-LVR residential mortgage lending, or vary the capital buffer ratio condition to remove or change the level of any countercyclical capital buffer introduced earlier.
In accordance with the Act, banks will be given at least seven days’ notice of a proposed
change, which notice will include a statement of the Reserve Bank’s reasons. They will have a reasonable opportunity to make submissions before any change is made to conditions of registration. The Reserve Bank will have regard to any submissions made by affected registered banks before it puts any such changes into effect.
The Reserve Bank may consider and have regard to the whole of this Statement of
Principles when varying, adding to, substituting or removing conditions of registration. 108A. Transitional arrangements may be provided in a bank’s conditions of registration where, for example, a change in policy has a substantial effect on the bank. An example of this is the move from the Basel I to the Basel II capital framework. G. BREACHES OF CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION
Where a bank is operating in breach of its conditions of registration, the Reserve Bank
will, unless it can be satisfied that the breach can be promptly rectified, invoke its crisis management powers. This may involve giving directions to the bank or recommending that the bank be placed in statutory management. A complete list of crisis management powers is contained in section O. However, where the breach relates to the minimum capital adequacy requirements, the following process will apply. BS1 December 2016

H. BREACH OF MINIMUM CAPITAL ADEQUACY RATIO
REQUIREMENTS
111. Where a bank breaches its minimum capital adequacy ratio requirements (that is, the 4.5%
Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the 6% Tier 1 capital ratio and the 8% Total capital ratio that normally apply to a banking group), the following framework will apply:
1. Where the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio falls below the registered bank’s
required level (normally 4.5%), and/or the Tier 1 capital ratio falls below the registered bank’s required level (normally 6%) and/or the Total capital ratio falls below the registered bank’s required level (normally 8%), the registered bank will be required to, prior to 1 January 2014, draw up a plan for restoring its capital to at least the minimum required level, and, after 1 January 2014, amend its existing capital plan for restoring the banking group’s buffer ratio to above 2.5%. The registered bank will be required to submit the amended plan to the Reserve Bank as soon as practicable after the first occurrence of the breach and the Reserve Bank will expect the registered bank to publish the plan at the earliest practicable opportunity. For the avoidance of doubt, there is no expectation that a plan will be published until any of the minimum capital adequacy ratio requirements are breached.
2. The plan or amended plan (as the case may be) should include the following
elements:
(a) A statement that no distributions to shareholders or to holders of capital instruments which qualify as capital for the purposes of the Reserve Bank's capital adequacy framework will be made until the bank's compliance with minimum capital adequacy requirements has been restored (and at that point distributions will be subject to limits that apply when the buffer ratio is 2.5% or less), unless the bank is contractually obliged to make such distributions (this will only arise with tier two capital, where the bank may be under a contractual obligation to make interest or dividend payments). (b) A statement that there will be no increase in the amount of the banking group's exposure to connected persons from the level which prevailed at the time of the first occurrence of the breach (where the level of the exposure is below the maximum limit) until the Common Equity Tier 1, the Tier 1 and Total capital ratios are restored to the minimum levels. (c) Where a banking group's Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio is less than
3.5 percent, a statement that there will be no increase in gross credit
exposures from the level which prevailed at the time of the first occurrence of the breach, until such time as the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio exceeds 3.5 percent.
112. These measures may be supplemented or reinforced by relevant conditions of registration.
Where a bank does not provide a plan including the elements listed above, or does not abide by the plan it has provided to the Reserve Bank, and/or does not comply with any BS1 December 2016

special conditions of registration, the Bank may give directions to the bank or make use of the other crisis management powers it has under the Reserve Bank Act (see Section O).
I. DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
113. Registered banks are required to make quarterly disclosures of key accounting and
prudential information. These disclosure requirements have been developed by the Reserve Bank in consultation with banks and auditors. The information which banks must disclose is set out in Orders in Council issued in terms of section 81 of the Act. The Reserve Bank considers that quarterly disclosure reinforces disciplines on the management and directors of the banks to maintain prudent banking practices.
114. The main elements of the disclosure requirements are as follows:

Disclosure statements for the year end must be subject to a full external audit, while
statements for the half year must be subject to either a full audit or a limited scope review.
Disclosure statements for the off quarters need not be audited.
Banks must make their disclosure statements readily accessible on their New Zealand
website. If a bank receives a request for copies of any of its disclosure statements, it must offer to provide them in printed form or by other suitable means (depending on how the request is made), and if the offer is accepted it must despatch them within two working days.
Banks are required to disclose information relating to the bank entity (mainly in the
full year disclosure statement) and the banking group (every quarter). For banks incorporated overseas, “bank entity” refers to the bank’s branch in New Zealand, and “banking group” refers to the bank’s New Zealand banking group.
Banks incorporated overseas are additionally required to make available on their New
Zealand website the financial statements of the bank (as a whole) and of its overseas banking group (where these are publicly available in the bank's country of domicile).
Banks are required to disclose in each quarterly disclosure statement a credit rating
applicable to their long term senior unsecured New Zealand dollar debt payable in New Zealand. J. CREDIT RATING REQUIREMENT

It is important that depositors have access to information about banks in a form that
they can readily comprehend. A credit rating provides a simple summary measure of relative risk, easily understood by relatively unsophisticated retail depositors. The availability of a rating allows such depositors, as well as other creditors, to assess the relative riskiness of individual banks and to make informed investment decisions. BS1 December 2016
A rating requirement is also likely to further enhance incentives for banks to operate
their businesses prudently in order to avoid a rating downgrade. This benefits both the bank and its customers.
For these reasons, all registered banks are required to obtain and subsequently maintain
a current credit rating applicable to their long-term senior unsecured New Zealand dollar obligations payable in New Zealand and to publish that rating in quarterly disclosure statements. The Reserve Bank issues notices to banks pursuant to Section 80 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 in order to bring this policy into effect.
Section 80 of the Act states that:
(1) The Bank may, by notice in writing to any registered bank or to all registered banks or to all members of any class of registered banks, require each of those banks to:
(a) obtain a rating of its creditworthiness or financial condition by a person or organisation nominated or approved by the Bank; and (b) maintain a current rating of the type referred to in paragraph (a). (2) The Bank may require a registered bank to publish the registered bank’s current rating, and all the qualifications to that rating, in the manner and with the frequency that the Bank directs.
A copy of the Section 80 notice issued to registered banks is attached as Appendix Two.
Banks which are guaranteed by a parent or some other party are subject to the rating
requirement, whether or not the guarantor is rated. This is because an issue rating of the type required ordinarily takes into account the strength and enforceability of the guarantee and the strength of the incentives that exist for the guarantor to make payment under the guarantee in a timely manner. It may be difficult for individuals to make such an assessment themselves.
New applicants for registration must obtain a credit rating before registration. Where
the applicant is a new company this may be an indicative rating, provided the indicative rating is accompanied by an undertaking from the rating agency that it will assign the indicative rating to the applicant in the event that registration is successful. The rating must be published in the bank’s initial disclosure statement.
Applicants must obtain their rating from a credit rating agency approved by the Reserve
Bank for the purposes of section 80 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. These agencies are Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service. Applicants may only use another rating agency with the agreement of the Reserve Bank. In such cases, the Reserve Bank must first be satisfied that the rating agency meets the criteria set out in
Appendix Three.
BS1
December 2016

K. RESPONSIBILITIES FOR NEW ZEALAND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF OVERSEAS INCORPORATED BANKS
122. As required by section 82 of the Act, all overseas incorporated banks must notify the
Reserve Bank of the name and address of their New Zealand chief executive officer and update this information as necessary. The Act defines a New Zealand chief executive officer as the most senior officer of the bank who is ordinarily resident in New Zealand, or, subject to the written agreement of the Reserve Bank, another person nominated by the bank. If a registered bank fails to nominate a New Zealand chief executive officer, the Bank may, after giving 14 days’ notice of its intention to do so, specify a particular employee to be the New Zealand chief executive officer. This requirement does not apply to New Zealand incorporated banks because the Chief Executive officer is normally a member of the board of directors and subject to the director responsibilities outlined in section L.
123. New Zealand chief executive officers of overseas incorporated banks or their agent
authorised in writing, are required to sign every disclosure statement issued by the registered bank and to make certain statements (attestations). These attestations are also required of directors as set out in paragraphs 125-129.
124. A New Zealand chief executive officer may appoint an agent to make the attestations
and sign the disclosure statements but responsibility for the veracity of the disclosure statements and the attestations remains with the New Zealand chief executive officer (and the directors).
125. Where the New Zealand chief executive officer believes the information contained
within a disclosure statement is false or misleading, they should decline to sign the statement. In such a case the New Zealand chief executive officer would need to give notice to the Reserve Bank and to the public that the disclosure statement had been issued without their consent. In the absence of such notice, the New Zealand chief executive officer remains liable for the content of the disclosure statement, regardless of whether or not they signed the statements. A New Zealand chief executive who signs, or has an agent sign, a disclosure statement which includes false or misleading information may be subject to civil or criminal liability.
L. DIRECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES
126. Directors are required to sign bank disclosure statements which must include certain
statements by the directors (attestations). This policy is intended to emphasise the fact that directors have ultimate responsibility for the ongoing viability of their bank and to strengthen incentives for them to take an active interest in key matters affecting the soundness of their bank.
127. Directors of a locally incorporated bank are required to attest whether or not, after due
enquiry, they believe that over the accounting period:

The registered bank has had systems in place to monitor and control adequately the
banking group’s material risks, including credit risk, concentration of credit risk, BS1 December 2016

interest rate risk, currency risk, equity risk, liquidity risk and other business risks and that those systems are being properly applied.

Exposures to connected persons (if any) have not been contrary to the interests of the
banking group.
The bank has been complying with its conditions of registration.
127A. Directors and the New Zealand chief executive officer of an overseas incorporated bank that is not “dual registered” (see paragraph 39 above) are required to attest whether or not, after due enquiry, they believe that over the accounting period:
The branch has had systems in place to monitor and control adequately its New
Zealand banking group's material risks, including credit risk, concentration of credit risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, equity risk, liquidity risk and other business risks and that those systems are being properly applied.
The bank has been complying with its conditions of registration.
127B. Directors and the New Zealand chief executive officer of an overseas incorporated bank that is “dual registered” are required to attest whether or not, after due enquiry, they believe that over the accounting period:
The branch, and, if applicable, any other members of its New Zealand banking group,
have had systems in place to monitor and control adequately the material risks of “relevant members” of the group, including credit risk, concentration of credit risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, equity risk, liquidity risk and other business risks and that those systems are being properly applied. “Relevant members” means those members of the branch’s New Zealand banking group that do not also belong to the banking group of the associated, dual registered, locally incorporated registered bank. Additionally, in the full year disclosure statement, this attestation must include, for each material risk of each relevant member of the branch’s New Zealand banking group, a statement of which member(s) of the group monitored and controlled that risk.
The bank has been complying with its conditions of registration.

In all cases directors and, for overseas incorporated banks, the New Zealand chief
executive officer must also attest whether or not, after due enquiry they believe as at the date on which they sign the disclosure statement:

The disclosure statement is not false and misleading.
The disclosure statement contains all the required information.

Directors may appoint an agent to sign these attestations on their behalf, but responsibility
for the veracity of the attestations remains with the directors themselves.
A director who signs, or who has an agent sign, a disclosure statement which is published
and includes false or misleading information may be subject to civil or criminal liability. A BS1 December 2016

director of a registered bank may also have civil liability arising from the content of a disclosure statement that the bank publishes, even if he or she has not signed it. Further information on the relevant offences and civil liability in the Act, and the defences provided in the Act, is set out in the Reserve Bank document “Registered Bank Disclosure Regime: Explanatory information on Orders in Council” (BS7A). 130A. It is the responsibility of directors to satisfy themselves that the detailed corporate governance arrangements of the bank are appropriate to the particular nature of the bank’s business and risks. Board members should be and remain qualified for their positions. M. CHANGES OF OWNERSHIP
131. As specified in section 77A of the Act a person must obtain the written consent of the
Reserve Bank before giving effect to a transaction that would result in that person having a “significant influence” over the registered bank or increasing the person’s level of significant influence beyond the level previously approved by the Reserve Bank. A significant influence is defined in the Act as:

the ability to directly or indirectly appoint 25% or more of the board of directors (or
other persons exercising powers of management, however described) of the registered bank; or
a direct or indirect qualifying interest in 10% or more of the voting securities issued or
allotted by the registered bank.

A qualifying interest, in relation to a specified security, means:

the legal or beneficial ownership of the specified security;
the power to exercise, or control the exercise of, any voting right attached to the
specified security;
the power to acquire or dispose of the specified security;
the power to control the acquisition or disposition of the specified security by another
person; or
the powers referred to above under, or by virtue of, any trust, agreement, arrangement
or understanding relating to the specified security.

The Reserve Bank will generally assess applications for consent to acquire or increase
significant influence over a registered bank having regard to the matters specified in
section 73 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989 for the purposes of determining
registration applications. Those matters are explained in section C of this document. The information that an applicant will need to provide is indicated in the Reserve Bank document entitled ‘Application for Consent to Acquire or Increase Significant Influence Over a Registered Bank: Material to be provided to the Reserve Bank’ (BS9). BS1 December 2016
The Reserve Bank may require additional information in order to determine a particular
application and will advise the applicant accordingly.
In giving consent to acquire or increase significant influence over a registered bank, the
Reserve Bank, under section 77A of the Act, may:

specify the level of significant influence that a person may have or acquire over any
registered bank without the need for a further consent; and
impose any terms and conditions that it thinks fit.
N. ESTABLISHMENT OF OVERSEAS BRANCHES,
REPRESENTATIVE OFFICES OR SUBSIDIARIES

Locally incorporated banks wishing to establish a subsidiary, branch or representative
office in another country should seek the approval of the Reserve Bank before making application to the host supervisor or licensing authority. O. CRISIS MANAGEMENT
The Act sets out various powers which the Reserve Bank can use in the event that a bank
distress or failure situation threatens the soundness of the financial system.
The crisis management powers the Bank has available are as follows:
(I) Section 77 of the Act - Power to recommend deregistration
Where the Reserve Bank considers that any of the following applies:

a registered bank was registered on the basis of false or misleading information;
there has been a change in any of the matters to which the Bank must have regard
when it considers an application for registration which has had a materially adverse effect on the registered bank’s standing or financial position;
there has been a transfer of direct or indirect control of the registered bank which is
materially adverse to the registered bank’s standing or financial position;
for a registered bank incorporated overseas, there has been a change in any of the
matters relating to the law and regulatory requirements or disclosure practices in the home jurisdiction which is materially adverse;
for a registered bank which is a subsidiary of an overseas person, there has been a
change in any of the matters relating to the law and regulatory requirements or disclosure practices in the overseas person’s home jurisdiction which is materially adverse; BS1 December 2016
a registered bank is in receivership or liquidation, or some other equivalent;
a registered bank has not complied with a condition of registration;
a registered bank has not carried on business in a prudent manner;
a registered bank has failed to comply with an obligation imposed under the Reserve
Bank Act or regulations made under the Act.
The Reserve Bank may recommend to the Minister of Finance that the registration of the bank be cancelled. The Reserve Bank is required to give a registered bank at least seven days’ notice of its intention to make such a recommendation and to provide a statement of its reasons. It must give the registered bank a reasonable opportunity to make submissions, and must have regard to those submissions. (II) Section 99 of the Act - Power to obtain information and documents

Where the Reserve Bank believes that information provided to it, or which has been
published in a disclosure statement, is false or misleading or where a registered bank has failed to provide or publish required information, the Reserve Bank may, if it considers it necessary, appoint a person to enter and search the bank's premises in order to obtain the information required. (III) Section 101 of the Act - Power to investigate the affairs of a registered bank
Where the Reserve Bank is satisfied that it is necessary or desirable to do so in order to
determine whether or not it should exercise its power to recommend statutory management or its power to give directions, it may appoint someone to investigate the affairs of a registered bank. (IV) Section 113 of the Act - Power to give directions
If the Reserve Bank has reasonable grounds to believe that any of the following applies to
a registered bank or an associated person of a registered bank:

it is insolvent, or is likely to become insolvent;
it is about to suspend payment or is unable to meet its obligations;
its affairs are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the soundness of the
financial system;
its circumstances are prejudicial to the soundness of the financial system;
BS1
December 2016

or that any of the following applies to a registered bank:

its business has not been, or is not being, conducted in a prudent manner;
it has failed to comply with a condition of registration;
or that any of the following persons has failed to comply with any requirement imposed by the Act or regulations made under the Act or has been convicted of an offence against the Act:
the registered bank
a director of a registered bank
the New Zealand chief executive officer of an overseas incorporated registered bank
the Reserve Bank may, with the prior consent of the Minister, give written directions to the bank or an associated person of the registered bank. Scope of directions A direction issued under section 113 may require a registered bank or associated person to:
consult with the Bank about their circumstances and the methods of resolving any
difficulties facing them;
carry on any business or any part of its business in accordance with the direction;
cease to carry on its business or any part of its business;
ensure that any officer or employee ceases to take part in the management or conduct
of its business, except to the extent permitted by the Bank;
remove or replace its auditor or appoint an auditor;
remove or replace a director of an associated person of a registered bank;
take any action specified to address a breach of any condition of registration;
take any action specified to address any financial difficulties;
take any other action specified.
(V) Section 113B of the Act - Power to remove, replace or appoint directors

Where any of the circumstances outlined in section 113 apply the Reserve Bank may,
subject to the consent of the Minister, remove, replace or appoint a director of a registered bank or of an associated person. BS1 December 2016

(VI) Section 117 of the Act - Power to recommend statutory management
144. Where the Reserve Bank is satisfied on reasonable grounds that any of the following
applies:

a registered bank or an associated person of the registered bank is insolvent, or likely
to become insolvent;
a registered bank or an associated person of the registered bank has suspended
payment or is about to do so or is unable to meet its obligations;
the registered bank or an associated person has failed to comply with a direction;
the affairs of the registered bank or an associated person are being conducted in a
manner prejudicial to the soundness of the financial system;
the circumstances of the registered bank or an associated person are such as to be
prejudicial to the soundness of the financial system;
the business of the registered bank has not been or is not being conducted in a prudent
manner; the Reserve Bank has the power to recommend to the Minister that the registered bank and any associated person be placed under statutory management.

A statutory manager has wide powers, including the power to suspend payment of money
owing and the power to convert a branch of an overseas bank into a locally incorporated entity. In addition, where a registered bank is declared subject to statutory management, this creates a moratorium on legal proceedings. When exercising their powers under the Act, statutory managers are required to have primary regard to the need to maintain public confidence in the operation and soundness of the financial system, and the need to avoid significant damage to the financial system. They are also required to have regard to the need to resolve the difficulties of the registered bank as quickly as possible and to preserving the position and maintaining the ranking of creditors’ claims, to the extent that this is not inconsistent with the primary objectives specified in the Act. They are also required to carry out any directions given by the Reserve Bank. (VII) Loss absorbency 144A. The Reserve Bank’s “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A) and “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Approach)” (BS2B) require that any Additional Tier 1 capital instruments that are classified as liabilities under generally accepted accounting practice comply with the loss absorbency requirements for Additional Tier 1 capital instruments. This requires that if the banking group’s Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio falls below 5.125 percent of total risk weighted assets, then the instrument must either be, according to the terms of the contract, written-off or converted into ordinary shares. BS1 December 2016

144B. The Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy frameworks (BS2A and BS2B) also require that Additional Tier 1 capital instruments and Tier 2 capital instruments comply with the loss absorbency at the point of non-viability criteria. These criteria state that all Additional Tier 1 capital instruments and Tier 2 capital instruments must provide that, on the occurrence of a non-viability trigger event, the instrument will be immediately and irrevocably converted into ordinary shares or will be written-off. 144C. The non-viability trigger event for the registered bank defined as:
(a) a direction given, by notice in writing, to the registered bank by the Reserve Bank under section 113 of the Act, on the basis that the financial position of the registered bank is such that it meets any of the grounds in section 113(1)(a) to (e) of the Act, requiring the registered bank to exercise its rights of either writeoff or conversion, under the instrument; or (b) the registered bank being made subject to statutory management by an Order in Council issued pursuant to section 117 of the Act. 144D. The circumstances in which the Reserve Bank would issue a direction to a registered bank under section 113(1) of the Act requiring conversion or write-off of capital instruments as per the terms of the instrument cannot be determined ex ante. The Reserve Bank’s consideration will include the particular circumstances of the registered bank, the relative ranking of claims, whether it is likely that other resolution or recovery mechanisms will be used and wider financial stability concerns. However the guiding principle for the Reserve Bank will be that such a direction will be issued when the Reserve Bank determines that, without conversion or write-off, the registered bank would become non-viable. 144E. The Reserve Bank does not anticipate (but also does not rule out) that it would direct a registered bank under section 113(1) of the Act to convert or write-off capital as per the terms of the instrument when, in the view of the Reserve Bank the registered bank is operating— (a) above its conservation buffer; or (b) within its conservation buffer but the immediate risk that its capital will deteriorate below its minimum capital ratio is low. 144F. If a registered bank is placed into statutory management the statutory manager will have the right to decide whether capital instruments will be converted or written-off (to the extent conversion or write-off has not already occurred). In deciding whether to exercise this right the statutory manager must take into account the considerations set out in section 121 of the Act. (VIII) Open Bank Resolution (OBR) pre-positioning requirements
146. Where relevant, applicants for registration will be required to pre-position for Open
Bank Resolution (OBR) as part of their planning and preparation for potential financial distress. This means having operational and system capability (i.e., the OBR functionality) to execute pre-positioned processes that would enable customers to have access to the unfrozen or available portion of their funds at 9am the next business day BS1 December 2016

after the appointment of a statutory manager. The OBR functionality is a mechanism for providing bank customers continued access to liquidity and banking service in a bank failure event.
147. The primary objective of the OBR policy is to ensure the continuation of the core
banking functions of the distressed bank. The pre-positioning of customer accounts means that they would have access to the available, or good, portion of their funds the next business day after the registered bank fails.
148. Applicants for registration will need to satisfy the Reserve Bank that they will be able
to comply with the Reserve Bank’s OBR pre-positioning requirements policy as explained in the Reserve Bank document “Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Prepositioning Requirements Policy” (BS 17).
149. An applicant will be required to have OBR functionality integrating the pre-positioning
requirements into its systems and processes. The Implementation Plan is the registered bank’s documentation of its OBR design solution to comply with the OBR prepositioning requirements and deliver the outcomes described in the policy. The testing regime should be able to demonstrate that the OBR functionality will work in a failure event.
150. An applicant with retail deposits over NZ$ 1 billion must comply with the conditions of
registration set out in Appendix One.
P. FOREIGN SUPERVISOR ACCESS TO INFORMATION HELD BY REGISTERED BANKS
151. Under section 98A of the Act, a foreign supervisor wishing to carry out an on-site
inspection of, or obtain information from, a registered bank or a member of a registered bank’s banking group for the purposes of the foreign supervisor’s supervisory functions may request authorisation to do so from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. The Reserve Bank will grant authorisation only if it is satisfied that sufficient provision exists in the foreign supervisor’s jurisdiction to protect the confidentiality of the information, data and forecasts obtained or required by the foreign supervisor.
152. If the Reserve Bank authorises a foreign supervisor to carry out an on-site inspection of, or
to obtain information from, a registered bank or a member of a registered bank’s banking group, then the registered bank is required under section 98B of the Act to supply the foreign supervisor with any information, data, or forecasts, including information relating to individual customers, that the foreign supervisor requires in order to carry out its supervisory functions.
153. If the Reserve Bank authorises a foreign supervisor to inspect and require information
from a registered bank or a member of a registered bank’s banking group, the Reserve Bank will notify the registered bank that such an authorisation has been made and the terms of that authorisation. BS1 December 2016

Q. UNITED NATIONS SANCTIONS
154. In order to assess the standing of an applicant (or its owner), the Reserve Bank will
additionally have regard to New Zealand’s responsibilities pursuant to resolutions made by the United Nations Security Council under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations that impose sanctions relating to the banking sector, in particular, for the purposes of:

registration as a registered bank;
consent to a change of ownership; and
approval of the establishment of a subsidiary, branch or representative office in
another country.
BS1
December 2016

APPENDIX ONE – STANDARD CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION
This appendix sets out standard conditions of registration for a registered bank. The standard conditions for New Zealand incorporated banks will vary depending on whether a bank’s capital requirements are calculated under the standardised approach (in BS2A) or the internal models based approach (in BS2B) of the Reserve Bank’s capital adequacy framework. The actual conditions of registration imposed on an individual bank may vary depending on the circumstances of the bank. The standard conditions also provide conditions that are part of the Reserve Bank’s macro-prudential toolkit; these are the buffer ratio, and conditions imposing restrictions on high-LVR residential mortgage lending. These tools may be deployed at particular times, based on judgements the Reserve Bank makes about system-wide risks. The buffer ratio is normally set at 2.5% of risk weighted assets but on occasions may be set higher to accommodate a system-wide build-up of risk; the addition to the buffer over 2.5% is the countercyclical capital buffer. Restrictions on high-LVR residential mortgage lending may also be imposed if indicators such as rapid price rises and loosening credit standards in the housing market point to an increase in system-wide risk.
I. CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION FOR NEW ZEALAND
INCORPORATED REGISTERED BANKS
Capital requirements – conditions for the standardised approach

That—
(a) the Total capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 8 percent; (b) the Tier 1 capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 6 percent; (c) the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 4.5 percent; and (d) the total capital of the banking group is not less than $30 million. (e) the process in Subpart 2H of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document:
“Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A) dated [month year] is followed for the recognition and repayment of capital. For the purposes of this condition of registration, capital, the Total capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio, and the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio must be calculated in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A) dated [month year]. 1A. That— (a) the bank has an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the requirements set out in the document “Guidelines on a Bank’s Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (“ICAAP”)” (BS12) dated [month year]; BS1 December 2016

(b) under its ICAAP, the bank identifies and measures its “other material risks” defined as all material risks of the banking group that are not explicitly captured in the calculation of the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the Total capital ratio under the requirements set out in the document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A) dated [month year]; and (c) the bank determines an internal capital allocation for each identified and measured “other material risk”. 1B. That, if the buffer ratio of the banking group is 2.5% or less, the bank must:
(a) according to the following table, limit the aggregate distributions of the bank’s earnings to the percentage limit to distributions that corresponds to the banking group’s buffer ratio:
Banking group’s buffer ratio
Percentage limit to distributions of the bank’s earnings 0% – 0.625% 0% >0.625 – 1.25% 20% >1.25 – 1.875% 40% >1.875 – 2.5% 60% (b) prepare a capital plan to restore the banking group’s buffer ratio to above 2.5% within any timeframe determined by the Reserve Bank for restoring the buffer ratio; and (c) have the capital plan approved by the Reserve Bank. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— “buffer ratio”, “distributions”, and “earnings” have the same meaning as in Part 3 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Capital Adequacy Framework (Standardised Approach)” (BS2A) dated [month year]. This condition of registration applies on and after 1 January 2014. Capital requirements – conditions for the models based approach

That—
(a) the Total capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 8 percent; (b) the Tier 1 capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 6 percent; (c) the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio of the banking group is not less than 4.5 percent; and BS1 December 2016

(d) the Total capital of the banking group is not less than $30 million; and (e) the process in Subpart 2H of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document:
“Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is followed for the recognition and repayment of capital. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— the scalar referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital adequacy framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is 1.06. “Total capital ratio”, “Tier 1 capital ratio”, “Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio”, and “Total capital” must be calculated in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital adequacy framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]. [If applicable—] For the purposes of this condition of registration, the supervisory adjustment referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is the sum of:
[any applicable supervisory adjustments]
1A. That—
(a) the bank has an internal capital adequacy assessment process (“ICAAP”) that accords with the requirements set out in the document “Guidelines on a bank’s internal capital adequacy assessment process (‘ICAAP’)” (BS12) dated [month year]; (b) under its ICAAP the bank identifies and measures its “other material risks” defined as all material risks of the banking group that are not explicitly captured in the calculation of the Common Equity Tier 1 capital ratio, the Tier 1 capital ratio and the Total capital ratio under the requirements set out in the document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]; and (c) the bank determines an internal capital allocation for each identified and measured “other material risk”. 1B. That the banking group complies with all requirements set out in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]. 1C. That, if the buffer ratio of the banking group is 2.5% or less, the bank must:
(a) according to the following table, limit the aggregate distributions of the bank’s earnings to the percentage limit to distributions that corresponds to the banking group’s buffer ratio:
BS1
December 2016

Banking group’s buffer ratio
Percentage limit to distributions of the bank’s earnings 0% – 0.625% 0% >0.625 – 1.25% 20% >1.25 – 1.875% 40% >1.875 – 2.5% 60% (b) prepare a capital plan to restore the banking group’s buffer ratio to above 2.5% within any timeframe determined by the Reserve Bank for restoring the buffer ratio; and (c) have the capital plan approved by the Reserve Bank. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— “buffer ratio”, “distributions”, and “earnings” have the same meaning as in Part 3 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document: “Capital Adequacy Framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year]. the scalar referred to in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Capital adequacy framework (Internal Models Based Approach)” (BS2B) dated [month year] is 1.06. This condition of registration applies on and after 1 January 2014. General conditions of registration
2. That the banking group does not conduct any non-financial activities that in aggregate
are material relative to its total activities.
In this condition of registration, the meaning of “material” is based on generally accepted accounting practice.
3. That the banking group’s insurance business is not greater than 1% of its total
consolidated assets.
For the purposes of this condition of registration, the banking group’s insurance business is the sum of the following amounts for entities in the banking group:
(a) if the business of an entity predominantly consists of insurance business and the entity is not a subsidiary of another entity in the banking group whose business predominantly consists of insurance business, the amount of the insurance business to sum is the total consolidated assets of the group headed by the entity; and BS1 December 2016

(b) if the entity conducts insurance business and its business does not predominantly consist of insurance business and the entity is not a subsidiary of another entity in the banking group whose business predominantly consists of insurance business, the amount of the insurance business to sum is the total liabilities relating to the entity’s insurance business plus the equity retained by the entity to meet the solvency or financial soundness needs of its insurance business. In determining the total amount of the banking group’s insurance business— (a) all amounts must relate to on balance sheet items only, and must comply with generally accepted accounting practice; and (b) if products or assets of which an insurance business is comprised also contain a non-insurance component, the whole of such products or assets must be considered part of the insurance business. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— “insurance business” means the undertaking or assumption of liability as an insurer under a contract of insurance:
“insurer” and “contract of insurance” have the same meaning as provided in sections 6 and 7 of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010.
4. That the aggregate credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of any allowances
for impairment) of the banking group to all connected persons do not exceed the ratingcontingent limit outlined in the following matrix:
Credit rating of the registered bank1
Connected exposure limit (% of the
Banking Group’s Tier 1 capital)
AA/Aa2 and above 75
AA-/Aa3 70
A+/A1 60
A/A2 40
A-/A3 30
BBB+/Baa1 and below 15
Within the rating-contingent limit, credit exposures (of a non-capital nature and net of any allowances for impairment) to non-bank connected persons shall not exceed 15 percent of the banking group’s tier 1 capital. For the purposes of this condition of registration, compliance with the rating-contingent connected exposure limit is determined in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Connected Exposures Policy” (BS8) dated [month year].
5. That exposures to connected persons are not on more favourable terms (e.g. as relates to
such matters as credit assessment, tenor, interest rates, amortisation schedules and requirement for collateral) than corresponding exposures to non-connected persons. 1 This table uses the rating scales of Standard & Poor’s, Fitch Ratings and Moody’s Investors Service. (Fitch Ratings’ scale is identical to Standard & Poor’s.) BS1 December 2016

That the registered bank complies with the following corporate governance
requirements:
(a) the board of the registered bank must have at least five directors; (b) the majority of the board members must be non-executive directors; (c) at least half of the board members must be independent directors; (d) an alternate director,— (i) for a non-executive director must be non-executive; and (ii) for an independent director must be independent; (e) at least half of the independent directors of the registered bank must be ordinarily resident in New Zealand; (f) the chairperson of the board of the registered bank must be independent; and (g) the bank’s constitution must not include any provision permitting a director, when exercising powers or performing duties as a director, to act other than in what he or she believes is the best interests of the company (i.e. the registered bank). For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-executive” and “independent” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Corporate Governance” (BS14) dated [month year].
That no appointment of any director, chief executive officer, or executive who reports
or is accountable directly to the chief executive officer, is made in respect of the registered bank unless:
(a) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (b) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment.
That a person must not be appointed as chairperson of the board of the registered bank
unless:
(a) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (b) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment.
That the registered bank has a board audit committee, or other separate board
committee covering audit matters, that meets the following requirements:
(a) the mandate of the committee must include: ensuring the integrity of the bank’s financial controls, reporting systems and internal audit standards; (b) the committee must have at least three members; BS1 December 2016

(c) every member of the committee must be a non-executive director of the registered bank; (d) the majority of the members of the committee must be independent; and (e) the chairperson of the committee must be independent and must not be the chairperson of the registered bank. For the purposes of this condition of registration, “non-executive” and “independent” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Corporate Governance” (BS14) dated [month year].
10. That a substantial proportion of the bank’s business is conducted in and from New
Zealand.
11. That the banking group complies with the following quantitative requirements for
liquidity-risk management:
(a) the one-week mismatch ratio of the banking group is not less than zero per cent at the end of each business day; (b) the one-month mismatch ratio of the banking group is not less than zero per cent at the end of each business day; and (c) the one-year core funding ratio of the banking group is not less than 75 per cent at the end of each business day. For the purposes of this condition of registration, the ratios identified must be calculated in accordance with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand documents entitled “Liquidity Policy” (BS13) dated [month year] and “Liquidity Policy Annex: Liquid Assets” (BS13A) dated [month year].
12. That the registered bank has an internal framework for liquidity risk management that is
adequate in the registered bank’s view for managing the bank’s liquidity risk at a prudent level, and that, in particular:
(a) is clearly documented and communicated to all those in the organisation with responsibility for managing liquidity and liquidity risk; (b) identifies responsibility for approval, oversight and implementation of the framework and policies for liquidity risk management; (c) identifies the principal methods that the bank will use for measuring, monitoring and controlling liquidity risk; and (d) considers the material sources of stress that the bank might face, and prepares the bank to manage stress through a contingency funding plan. BS1 December 2016

That no more than 10% of total assets may be beneficially owned by a SPV.
For the purposes of this condition,—
“total assets” means all assets of the banking group plus any assets held by any SPV that are not included in the banking group’s assets:
“SPV” means a person—
(a) to whom any member of the banking group, has sold, assigned, or otherwise transferred, any asset; (b) who has granted, or may grant, a security interest in its assets for the benefit of any holder of any covered bond; and (c) who carries on no other business except for that necessary or incidental to guarantee the obligations of any member of the banking group under a covered bond:
“covered bond” means a debt security issued by any member of the banking group, for which repayment to holders is guaranteed by a SPV, and investors retain an unsecured claim on the issuer.
That—
(a) no member of the banking group may give effect to a qualifying acquisition or business combination that meets the notification threshold, and does not meet the non-objection threshold, unless:
(i) the registered bank has notified the Reserve Bank in writing of the intended acquisition or business combination and at least 10 working days have passed; and (ii) at the time of notifying the Reserve Bank of the intended acquisition or business combination, the registered bank provided the Reserve Bank with the information required under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated [month year]; and (b) no member of the banking group may give effect to a qualifying acquisition or business combination that meets the non-objection threshold unless:
(i) the registered bank has notified the Reserve Bank in writing of the intended acquisition or business combination; (ii) at the time of notifying the Reserve Bank of the intended acquisition or business combination, the registered bank provided the Reserve Bank with the information required under the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated [month year]; and (iii) the Reserve Bank has given the registered bank a notice of non-objection to the significant acquisition or business combination. BS1 December 2016

For the purposes of this condition of registration, “qualifying acquisition or business combination”, “notification threshold” and “non-objection threshold” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Banking Supervision Handbook document “Significant Acquisitions Policy” (BS15) dated December 2011. The following five conditions only apply during a period when the Reserve Bank has decided to deploy its macro-prudential tool to restrict high-LVR lending in the residential property sector. Note that the figures set out below are purely illustrative, and should not be taken as an indication of what the Reserve Bank would impose in any particular circumstance:
15. That, for a loan-to-valuation measurement period, the total of the registered bank’s
qualifying new mortgage lending amounts must not— (a) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [90%], exceed [5%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period; and (b) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [80%], exceed [12%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period.
16. That the registered bank must not make a residential mortgage loan unless the terms and
conditions of the loan contract or the terms and conditions for an associated mortgage require that a borrower obtain the registered bank’s agreement before the borrower can grant to another person a charge over the residential property used as security for the loan.
17. That the registered bank must not permit a borrower to grant a charge in favour of
another person over a residential property used as security for a residential mortgage loan unless the sum of the lending secured by the charge and the loan value for the residential mortgage loan would not exceed [80%] of the property value of the residential property when the lending secured by the charge is drawn down.
18. That the registered bank must not provide a residential mortgage loan if the residential
property to be mortgaged to the registered bank as security for the residential mortgage loan is subject to a charge in favour of another person unless the total amount of credit secured by the residential property would not exceed [80%] of the property value when the residential mortgage loan is drawn down.
19. That the registered bank must not act as broker or arrange for a member of its banking
group to provide a residential mortgage loan.
In conditions of registration 15 to 19,—
“loan-to-valuation ratio”, “loan value”, “property value”, “qualifying new mortgage lending amount” and “residential mortgage loan” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]:
“loan-to-valuation measurement period” means—
(a) the six calendar month period ending on the last day of [month year]; and BS1 December 2016

(b) thereafter a period of three calendar months ending on the last day of the third calendar month, the first of which ends on the last day of [month+1 year]. [Alternative for banks with lower mortgage lending:
“loan-to-valuation measurement period” means a period of six calendar months ending on the last day of the sixth calendar month, the first of which ends on the last day of [month year]] In these conditions of registration,— “banking group”— (a) means [X Bank] (as reporting entity) and all other entities included in the group as defined in section 6(1) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 for the purposes of Part 7 of that Act (unless paragraph (b) applies); or (b) means [X Bank’s] financial reporting group (as defined in section 2(1) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993) if the Financial Reporting Act 1993 applies to the bank:
“generally accepted accounting practice”—
(a) has the same meaning as in section 8 of the Financial Reporting Act 2013 (unless paragraph (b) applies); or (b) means generally accepted accounting practice within the meaning of section 3 of the Financial Reporting Act 1993 if the bank is required to prepare financial statements in accordance with that practice. (IA) LOCALLY INCORPORATED BANKS WHOSE NEW ZEALAND LIABILITIES, NET OF AMOUNTS DUE TO RELATED PARTIES, EXCEED $10 BILLION (ADDITIONAL TO THOSE NORMALLY APPLYING TO ALL LOCALLY INCORPORATED BANKS)

That the registered bank has legal and practical ability to control and execute any
business, and any functions relating to any business, of the bank that are carried on by a person other than the bank, sufficient to achieve, under normal business conditions and in the event of stress or failure of the bank or of a service provider to the bank, the following outcomes:
(a) that the bank’s clearing and settlement obligations due on a day can be met on that day; (b) that the bank’s financial risk positions on a day can be identified on that day; (c) that the bank’s financial risk positions can be monitored and managed on the day following any failure and on subsequent days; and (d) that the bank’s existing customers can be given access to payments facilities on the day following any failure and on subsequent days. BS1 December 2016

For the purposes of this condition of registration, the term “legal and practical ability to control and execute” is explained in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Outsourcing Policy” (BS11) dated [month year].
2. That:
(a) the business and affairs of the bank are managed by, or under the direction or supervision of, the board of the bank; (b) the employment contract of the chief executive officer of the bank or person in an equivalent position (together “CEO”) is with the bank, and the terms and conditions of the CEO’s employment agreement are determined by, and any decisions relating to the employment or termination of employment of the CEO are made by, the board of the bank; and (c) all staff employed by the bank have their remuneration determined by (or under the delegated authority of) the board or the CEO of the bank and are accountable (directly or indirectly) to the CEO of the bank. (IB) LOCALLY INCORPORATED BANKS WHOSE RETAIL DEPOSITS EXCEED $1 BILLION (ADDITIONAL TO THOSE NORMALLY APPLYING TO ALL LOCALLY INCORPORATED BANKS)

That the bank is pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution and in accordance with a
direction from the Reserve Bank, the bank can – (a) close promptly at any time of the day and on any day of the week and that effective upon the appointment of the statutory manager – (i) all liabilities are frozen in full; and (ii) no further access by customers and counterparties to their accounts (deposits, liabilities or other obligations) is possible; (b) apply a de minimis to relevant customer liability accounts; (c) apply a partial freeze to the customer liability account balances; (d) reopen by no later than 9am the next business day following the appointment of a statutory manager and provide customers access to their unfrozen funds; (e) maintain a full freeze on liabilities not pre-positioned for open bank resolution; and (f) reinstate customers’ access to some or all of their residual frozen funds. For the purposes of this condition of registration, “de minimis”, “partial freeze”, “customer liability account”, and “frozen and unfrozen funds” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Prepositioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated [month year].
That the bank has an Implementation Plan that—
(a) is up-to-date; and
BS1
December 2016

(b) demonstrates that the bank’s prepositioning for Open Bank Resolution meets the requirements set out in the Reserve Bank document: “Open Bank Resolution Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS 17). For the purposes of this condition of registration, “Implementation Plan” has the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated [month year].
3. That the bank has a compendium of liabilities that—
(a) at the product-class level lists all liabilities, indicating which are— (i) pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution; and (ii) not pre-positioned for Open Bank Resolution; (b) is agreed to by the Reserve Bank; and (c) if the Reserve Bank’s agreement is conditional, meets the Reserve Bank’s conditions. For the purposes of this condition of registration, “compendium of liabilities”, and “prepositioned and non pre-positioned liabilities” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated [month year].
4. That on an annual basis the bank tests all the component parts of its Open Bank
Resolution solution that demonstrates the bank’s prepositioning for Open Bank Resolution as specified in the bank’s Implementation Plan. For the purposes of this condition of registration, “Implementation Plan” has the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document “Open Bank Resolution (OBR) Pre-positioning Requirements Policy” (BS17) dated [month year].
II. CONDITIONS OF REGISTRATION FOR OVERSEAS
INCORPORATED REGISTERED BANKS

That the banking group does not conduct any non-financial activities that in aggregate
are material relative to its total activities.
In this condition of registration, the meaning of “material” is based on generally accepted accounting practice.
That the banking group’s insurance business is not greater than 1% of its total
consolidated assets.
For the purposes of this condition of registration, the banking group’s insurance business is the sum of the following amounts for entities in the banking group:
(a) if the business of an entity predominantly consists of insurance business and the entity is not a subsidiary of another entity in the banking group whose business predominantly consists of insurance business, the amount of the insurance business to sum is the total consolidated assets of the group headed by the entity; and BS1 December 2016

(b) if the entity conducts insurance business and its business does not predominantly consist of insurance business and the entity is not a subsidiary of another entity in the banking group whose business predominantly consists of insurance business, the amount of the insurance business to sum is the total liabilities relating to the entity’s insurance business plus the equity retained by the entity to meet the solvency or financial soundness needs of its insurance business. In determining the total amount of the banking group’s insurance business— (a) all amounts must relate to on balance sheet items only, and must comply with generally accepted accounting practice; and (b) if products or assets of which an insurance business is comprised also contain a non-insurance component, the whole of such products or assets must be considered part of the insurance business. For the purposes of this condition of registration,— “insurance business” means the undertaking or assumption of liability as an insurer under a contract of insurance:
“insurer” and “contract of insurance” have the same meaning as provided in sections 6 and 7 of the Insurance (Prudential Supervision) Act 2010.
3. That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand does not constitute a
predominant proportion of the total business of the registered bank.
4. That no appointment to the position of the New Zealand chief executive officer of the
registered bank shall be made unless:
(a) the Reserve Bank has been supplied with a copy of the curriculum vitae of the proposed appointee; and (b) the Reserve Bank has advised that it has no objection to that appointment.
5. That [name of bank] complies with the requirements imposed on it by [name of the
supervisory authority in the bank's jurisdiction of domicile].
6. That [name of bank] complies with the following minimum capital adequacy
requirements, as administered by [name of supervisory authority in the bank’s jurisdiction of domicile]:
(a) Common Equity Tier 1 capital of [name of bank] is not less than 4.5 percent of risk weighted exposures; (b) Tier 1 capital of [name of bank] is not less than 6 percent of risk weighted exposures; (c) Total capital of [name of bank] is not less than 8 percent of risk weighted exposures.
7. That liabilities of the registered bank in New Zealand, net of amounts due to related
parties (including amounts due to a subsidiary or affiliate of the registered bank), do not exceed NZD $15 billion. BS1 December 2016

That retail deposits of the registered bank in New Zealand do not exceed $200 million.
For the purposes of this condition retail deposits are defined as deposits by natural persons, excluding deposits with an outstanding balance which exceeds $250,000. This condition applies only to banks which are incorporated in a jurisdiction which has legislation which gives deposits made, or credit conferred, in that jurisdiction a preferential claim in a winding up or which do not provide adequate disclosure in the home jurisdiction.
That the registered bank has an internal framework for liquidity risk management that is
adequate in the registered bank’s view for managing the bank’s liquidity risk at a prudent level, and that, in particular:
(a) is clearly documented and communicated to all those in the organisation with responsibility for managing liquidity and liquidity risk; (b) identifies responsibility for approval, oversight and implementation of the framework and policies for liquidity risk management; (c) identifies the principal methods that the bank will use for measuring, monitoring and controlling liquidity risk; and (d) considers the material sources of stress that the bank might face, and prepares the bank to manage stress through a contingency funding plan. There will also normally be a condition requiring the registered bank in New Zealand to comply with one or more minimum quantitative requirements for liquidity risk, but the specification of these requirements will vary from branch to branch. The following five conditions only apply during a period when the Reserve Bank has decided to deploy its macro-prudential tool to restrict high-LVR lending in the residential property sector. Note that the figures set out below are purely illustrative, and should not be taken as an indication of what the Reserve Bank would impose in any particular circumstance:
That, for a loan-to-valuation measurement period, the total of the business of the
registered bank in New Zealand’s qualifying new mortgage lending amounts must not— (a) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [90%], exceed [5%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period; and (b) for residential properties with a loan-to-valuation ratio of more than [80%], exceed [12%] of the total of the qualifying new mortgage lending amounts arising in the loan-to-valuation measurement period.
That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not make a residential
mortgage loan unless the terms and conditions of the loan contract or the terms and conditions for an associated mortgage require that a borrower obtain the registered bank’s agreement before the borrower can grant to another person a charge over the residential property used as security for the loan.
That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not permit a borrower to
grant a charge in favour of another person over a residential property used as security BS1 December 2016

for a residential mortgage loan unless the sum of the lending secured by the charge and the loan value for the residential mortgage loan would not exceed [80%] of the property value of the residential property when the lending secured by the charge is drawn down.
13. That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not provide a residential
mortgage loan if the residential property to be mortgaged to the registered bank as security for the residential mortgage loan is subject to a charge in favour of another person unless the total amount of credit secured by the residential property would not exceed [80%] of the property value when the residential mortgage loan is drawn down.
14. That the business of the registered bank in New Zealand must not—
(a) act as broker or arrange a residential mortgage loan for the business of the registered bank outside New Zealand or for an associated person of the registered bank outside New Zealand; or (b) facilitate the drawdown of a residential mortgage loan the registered bank originated as part of its business outside New Zealand or by an associated person of the registered bank outside New Zealand without notifying the Reserve Bank of this activity in the manner and form specified by the Reserve Bank. In conditions of registration 10 to 14,— “loan-to-valuation ratio”, “loan value”, “property value”, “qualifying new mortgage lending amount” and “residential mortgage loan” have the same meaning as in the Reserve Bank of New Zealand document entitled “Framework for Restrictions on High-LVR Residential Mortgage Lending” (BS19) dated [month year]:
“loan-to-valuation measurement period” means—
(a) the six calendar month period ending on the last day of [month year]; and (b) thereafter a period of three calendar months ending on the last day of the third calendar month, the first of which ends on the last day of [month+1 year]. [Alternative for banks with lower mortgage lending:
“loan-to-valuation measurement period” means a period of six calendar months ending on the last day of the sixth calendar month, the first of which ends on the last day of [month year]] In these conditions of registration,— “banking group”— (a) means the New Zealand business of the registered bank and its subsidiaries as required to be reported in group financial statements for the group’s New Zealand business under section 461B(2) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (unless paragraph (b) applies); or (b) if the Financial Reporting Act 1993 applies to the registered bank, means the New Zealand business of the registered bank and its subsidiaries as required to be reported in group financial statements for the group’s New Zealand business under section 9(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993:
“business of the registered bank in New Zealand”— BS1 December 2016

(a) means the New Zealand business of the registered bank as defined in the requirement for financial statements for New Zealand business in section 461B(1) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 (unless paragraph (b) applies); or (b) if the Financial Reporting Act 1993 applies to the registered bank, means the New Zealand business of the registered bank as required to be reported in financial statements under section 8(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993:
“generally accepted accounting practice”—
(a) has the same meaning as in section 8 of the Financial Reporting Act 2013 (unless paragraph (b) applies); or (b) means generally accepted accounting practice within the meaning of section 3 of the Financial Reporting Act 1993 if the registered bank is required to prepare financial statements in accordance with that practice:
“liabilities of the registered bank in New Zealand”— (a) means the liabilities that the registered bank would be required to report in financial statements for its New Zealand business if section 461B(1) of the Financial Markets Conduct Act 2013 applied (unless paragraph (b) applies); or (b) if the Financial Reporting Act 1993 applies to the registered bank, means the liabilities of the registered bank as required to be reported in financial statements under section 8(2) of the Financial Reporting Act 1993. BS1 December 2016

APPENDIX TWO – CREDIT RATING REQUIREMENT
SECTION 80 NOTICE issued to registered banks
With effect from [date], the Reserve Bank of New Zealand hereby requires [name of bank]:

to obtain and maintain a current credit rating applicable to its long term senior unsecured
obligations payable in New Zealand, in New Zealand dollars; and
to publish the rating in quarterly disclosure statements.
The rating may be obtained from any of the following rating agencies:
Standard and Poor’s
Moody’s Investors Service
Fitch Ratings
This notice is issued pursuant to Section 80 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. Head of Prudential Supervision Reserve Bank of New Zealand BS1 December 2016

APPENDIX THREE – APPROVAL OF CREDIT RATING AGENCIES

Approval criteria
(1) This appendix sets out the Reserve Bank’s criteria for approving rating agencies for the purposes of Part 5 of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand Act 1989. (2) When making decisions in relation to the approval of a rating agency, the Reserve Bank considers how a rating agency or its activities compare to the criteria set out in this
appendix on:
(a) independence;
(b) resources;
(c) objectivity;
(d) third party access to ratings;
(e) disclosure;
(f) consistency and comparability; and
(g) credibility.
Independence
(1) A rating agency should be independent and should conduct itself in a manner that supports its independence. It should have processes designed to prevent it from being subject to political or economic pressures that could influence a credit rating or its credit assessment processes. (2) A rating agency should have clear operational policies and procedures to identify and manage potential conflicts of interest, including between the credit rating activities of the rating agency and other interests of its shareholders or directors. (3) A rating agency should— (a) have high standards of corporate governance that are effective in safeguarding the independence and integrity of its credit risk assessment processes; (b) have periodic, rigorous and formal reviews that are independent of the business lines under review and that review— (i) its methodologies and models; and (ii) any significant changes to its methodologies and models; (c) have firewalls separating its credit rating activities from any affiliated businesses to help prevent conflicts of interest; and (d) adopt and adhere to a code of conduct that reflects market standards and internationally recognised principles. BS1 December 2016
Resources
(1) A rating agency should have sufficient financial and human resources to carry out high quality credit assessments. (2) A rating agency should— (a) be able to develop and maintain systems on an ongoing basis to produce timely, consistent and credible credit assessments and ratings; (b) allocate a sufficient number of appropriately qualified and competent people to the analysis, review and approval processes for the production of ratings; and (c) have sufficient resources to allow for regular substantive interaction with the subjects of its credit assessments. (3) A rating agency’s financial viability should not depend upon a small number of clients. (4) Rating decisions should be made by a rating committee composed of adequately qualified and experienced individuals in accordance with the rating agency’s methodologies.
Objectivity
(1) A rating agency’s assessment methodologies should be— (a) documented; (b) rigorous and systematic; (c) applied consistently; (d) where possible, validated by substantial historical experience; (e) based on both qualitative and quantitative approaches; and (f) subject to ongoing review. (2) A rating agency’s assessment methodologies should, where possible, be established for a sufficient period of time to provide for them to be rigorously back-tested and refined to a high level of confidence. (3) The ratings produced by its assessment methodologies should— (a) provide credible and consistent measures of credit risk; (b) be responsive to changes in financial condition; (c) be continuous (that is, not be point in time ratings); and (d) be subject to ongoing review, including— (i) after all significant events; and (ii) at least annually. (4) Paragraphs (3)(c) and (3)(d) do not apply to a rating that is not subject to ongoing monitoring or surveillance if the rating clearly indicates that it is not subject to any ongoing monitoring or surveillance. BS1 December 2016
Third party access to ratings
(1) A rating agency’s publicly disseminated credit rating opinions, analysis, reports and similar or related products should be accessible on equivalent terms to persons who have a legitimate interest in them, regardless of the jurisdiction in which they operate. (2) A rating agency should not use unsolicited ratings to pressure the subjects of those ratings to obtain solicited ratings. (3) A rating agency should not prevent the subjects of its credit rating assessments from disseminating that subject’s public credit ratings.
Disclosure
A rating agency should publicly disclose and maintain in a readily accessible form the following information:
(a) its ownership and corporate structure;
(b) its code of conduct;
(c) its process for assigning, monitoring and changing its credit ratings; (d) definitions for each of its rating categories and rating modifiers, including:
(i) the definition of default;
(ii) the time horizons, where applicable; and
(iii) the full rating scale;
(these definitions should be in a form that enables comparisons with ratings in other sectors and, to the extent possible, those produced by other rating agencies); (e) the actual default rates experienced in each rating category over time; (f) the probabilities associated with transitions between rating categories, (for example, the likelihood of AA ratings becoming A over time); (g) its policy on the release of ratings, including changes in ratings or rating modifiers; and (h) its policy on unsolicited ratings.
Consistency and comparability
(1) Ratings should represent credit risk in a consistent and comparable manner with regard to established practices for ratings. (2) The nomenclature associated with ratings should be established with regard to existing practices and with particular regard to default rates.
Credibility
In addition to the extent to which credibility is supported by the other criteria in this appendix, the Reserve Bank may have regard to other factors in assessing a rating agency’s credibility including, for example, the extent to which its credit assessments and ratings are used in the market by participants such as issuers, investors, bankers, insurers, securities traders and other financial services regulators, or the extent to which a rating agency is recognised under other regulatory regime. BS1 December 2016