PS18/14: Extending the Senior Managers and Certification Regime to FCA firms

– Feedback to CP17/25 and CP17/40, and near-final rules Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Policy Statement PS18/14* July 2018

Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms PS18/14 In this Policy Statement we report on the main issues arising from Consultation Papers 17/25 Individual Accountability:
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to all FCA firms and 17/40 Individual Accountability: Transitioning FCA firms and individuals to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime. We also publish the near-final rules. We have developed the policy in the underlying rules in the context of the existing UK and EU regulatory framework. We will keep the policy under review to assess whether any amendments will be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework. This includes changes that result from the UK’s vote to leave the EU. Please send any comments or queries to:
Jon Blankfield / Sophie Stern
Governance & Professionalism Policy
Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
London E20 1JN
Email:
ps18-14@fca.org.uk
You can download this Policy Statement and all FCA publications from our website: www.fca.org.uk. If you would like to receive this paper in an alternative format, please call 020 706 0790 or email:
publications_graphics@fca.org.uk or write to: Editorial and Digital team, Financial Conduct Authority, 12 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN. How to respond Contents 1 Overview 3
Part 1: Feedback to CP17/25:
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to all FCA firms 8 2 Senior Management Functions & Prescribed Responsibilities 9 3 Certification Regime 26 4 Fit and Proper Requirements 34 5 Conduct Rules 43 6 Enhanced Tier – Criteria and Extra Requirements 51 7 Applying the new regime to incoming UK branches 61 8 Changes that affect banking firms and solo‑regulated firms 65 9 Feedback to our Cost‑Benefit Analysis 68
Part 2: Feedback to CP17/40:
Transitioning FCA firms and individuals to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime 72 10 Transitional Arrangements 73 11 Conversion – Core and Limited Scope Firms (including branches) 76 12 Conversion – Enhanced Firms 83 13 Forms 89 14 Consequentials 98 15 Changes affecting banking firms 101
Annex 1
List of non‑confidential respondents 103
Annex 2
Abbreviations in this document 108
Appendix 1
Near-Final Rules 110 returns you to the contents list takes you to helpful abbreviations How to navigate this document onscreen

PS18/14
Chapter 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 1 Overview Introduction
1.1 The Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR) aims to strengthen individual
accountability in financial services.
1.2 In July 2017, we consulted on extending the SM&CR to almost all firms regulated only
by the FCA and not the PRA (‘solo‑regulated’ firms) in Consultation Paper (CP) 17/25 – ‘Individual Accountability: Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to all FCA firms’. A second CP, CP17/40 – ‘Individual Accountability: Transitioning FCA firms and individuals to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime’, set out how we proposed to move FCA firms and individuals from the Approved Persons Regime (APR) to the SM&CR.
1.3 This Policy Statement (PS) summarises the feedback we got to CP17/25 (Part 1) and
CP17/40 (Part 2), and our response to the feedback received.
1.4 We have provided a separate guide to the SM&CR. This sets out the main features of
the regime and gives the details of how the move to the SM&CR will happen. If your firm is preparing for the SM&CR, we recommend that you read the guide. Who does this affect?
1.5 All firms authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) and regulated
by the FCA will be affected by these changes, as well as European Economic Area (EEA) and third‑country branches. Insurers are also affected but these firms should read PS18/15.
1.6 The requirements depend on whether firms are classified as Limited Scope, Core or
Enhanced. Use Figure 1 and Table 1 to identify your firm’s classification.

PS18/14
Chapter 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Figure 1: Firm Checker Tool
No
You are a Core SM&CR fi rm unless one of the following applies:
You are an Enhanced SM&CR fi rm
Are you a fi rm that is currently exempt from the Approved Persons Regime? You are not an SM&CR fi rm Yes Are you a fi rm that is currently subject to a limited application of the Approved Persons Regime? You are a Limited Scope SM&CR fi rm Yes No You are a Signifi cant IFPRU fi rm You are a CASS Large fi rm You have Assets Under Management of £50 billion or more calculated as a three year rolling average You are a fi rm with total intermediary regulated business revenue of £35 million or more per annum, calculated as a three year rolling average You are a fi rm with annual revenue generated by regulated consumer credit lending of £100 m or more calculated as a three year rolling average You are a mortgage lender or administrator (that is not a bank) with 10,000 or more regulated mortgages outstanding
Table 1: Table of Firm Types
Firm type Description
Limited Scope Firm Firms that have fewer requirements than Core firms. This covers all firms that currently have a limited application of the Approved Persons Regime, including:

limited permission consumer credit firms
all sole traders
authorised professional firms whose only regulated activities are
non‑mainstream regulated activities
oil market participants
service companies
energy market participants
subsidiaries of local authorities or registered social landlords
insurance intermediaries whose principal business is not insurance
intermediation and who only have permission to carry on insurance mediation activity in relation to non‑investment insurance contracts
authorised internally managed Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)
Core Firm Firms that will have a baseline of SM&CR requirements applied. Enhanced Firm A small proportion of solo‑regulated firms that will have to apply extra rules. Who this applies to
1.7 People who should read this whole document:
all solo‑regulated UK firms authorised under FSMA
EEA and third‑country branches

PS18/14
Chapter 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
1.8 People who only need to read sections of this document:
1 Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms that also act as Appointed Representatives for other business (eg a limited permission credit broker that is also an AR for insurance business) are, however, within scope of the extended SM&CR as they are authorised firms.

firms subject to the Banking SM&CR (Chapters 8 and 15)
Appointed Representatives1
(Chapters 2, 3, 10 and 13)
1.9 People who don’t need to read this document:
incoming EEA firms providing cross‑border services only – these firms are out of
scope of the SM&CR
Payment Services firms that aren’t authorised under FSMA– these firms are out of
scope of the SM&CR
Insurers and insurance branches (please read PS18/15 for the relevant near-final
rules for these firms)
Context
1.10 This Policy Statement sets out changes to how we will regulate people working in
financial services. The SM&CR replaces the APR for nearly all the firms we regulate.
1.11 The aim of the SM&CR is to reduce harm to consumers and strengthen market
integrity by creating a system that enables firms and regulators to hold people to account. As part of this, the SM&CR aims to:
encourage staff to take personal responsibility for their actions
improve conduct at all levels
make sure firms and staff clearly understand and can demonstrate who does what
1.12 In March 2016 we applied the SM&CR to banks, building societies, credit unions and
PRA‑designated investment firms ('banking firms'). Subsequent changes to FSMA now require us to extend the SM&CR to all firms authorised to provide financial services under FSMA.
1.13 In this PS we summarise changes to our rules to extend the SM&CR to cover all
authorised firms. These rules will apply:
the Senior Managers Regime (SMR) to FCA solo‑regulated firms. This will focus
regulatory approval on fewer senior individuals in a firm than under the current APR
the Certification Regime to FCA solo‑regulated firms. This requires firms to
assess the fitness and propriety of specific individuals who could harm the firm, its customers or the market

PS18/14
Chapter 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

the Conduct Rules to most staff working in financial services in FCA
solo‑regulated firms
2 LINK
Summary of feedback and our response
1.14 We received 225 responses to CP17/25 and 47 to CP17/40. We have also considered
relevant responses to CP17/26 and CP17/41, which set out proposals for applying the SM&CR to insurers.
1.15 The vast majority of these responses supported our proposals. Many respondents
also asked for further clarification on how the rules apply. We also received some suggestions for changes to the proposed rules. In general, we intend to implement the consultation proposals, but will make some changes in response to this feedback.
1.16 As a result of the responses received, we have made the following changes to our
CP17/25 proposals:
removed the Prescribed Responsibility (that only applied to Core firms) to inform the
governing body of their legal and regulatory obligations
provided an easy process for firms to tell us they wish to voluntarily apply a higher
regime tier
amended three of the Enhanced criteria to smooth single‑year anomalies
lengthened the time period from 6 to 12 months for a firm to implement the
Enhanced tier, once they have met relevant criteria
1.17 We intend to implement the proposals set out in CP17/40 largely as proposed, but have
made two changes:
aligned the REP008 reporting period for Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms
with their annual return
adjusted a number of regulatory forms following specific feedback
1.18 We have concluded that these amendments do not lead to significant changes to the
costs and benefits and hence do not require an additional cost‑benefit analysis (CBA) under section 138I(5) of FSMA.
1.19 We have updated our CBA and published it alongside this PS. This is because of the
importance of the SM&CR for the financial services sector, changes in the number of firms in the different tiers, and the complexity of the CBA. The updated document sets out the CBA in relation to the near-final rules.2

PS18/14
Chapter 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Equality and diversity considerations
1.20 We have considered the equality and diversity issues that may arise from the new rules
in this PS.
1.21 Overall, we don’t consider our rules adversely impact any of the groups with protected
characteristics, ie age, disability, sex, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion and belief, sexual orientation and gender reassignment.
1.22 A consumer body suggested that we review whether the fit and proper requirements
support the recruitment of diverse candidates into leadership positions in firms. We have responded to this feedback in Chapter 4.
1.23 The same respondent considered that the SM&CR should be used to address diversity
on boards across the industry. While we agree that diversity is an important issue for firms and industry to address, we don’t think SM&CR is the best mechanism to deal with this. There are a number of other initiatives at the UK and EU level, including diversity obligations on firms under MiFID and CRD, that we believe are better placed to improve diversity. Our supervision teams will continue to impress on senior management the importance of diversity in their teams, and we may ask firms directly about gender diversity policies.3 Next steps and implementation dates
1.24 The legal instrument accompanying this PS contains near‑final rules. Although they are
near‑final in most respects, they:
3 www.fca.org.uk/news/speeches/women‑finance‑keeping‑pressure‑progress

may be amended by subsequent Handbook changes, for example those relating to
the UK’s exit from the European Union, or SM&CR optimisations
are not near‑final in respect of benchmark activities, our approach to which we will
consult on separately
are subject to commencement regulations to be made by HM Treasury
1.25 Firms affected by these changes will move to the new regime on 9 December 2019.
Note that Handbook references in this PS refer to the rules set out in the accompanying Instrument.
1.26 Firms should check they have the appropriate people in the correct approved functions
before approved individuals are converted from the APR to the SM&CR. This will help to make the move to the new regime as effective as possible.

PS18/14
Chapter 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Part 1:
Feedback to CP17/25:
Extending the Senior Managers &
Certification Regime to all FCA firms

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 2 Senior Management Functions & Prescribed Responsibilities All UK Limited Scope, Core and Enhanced firms should read this chapter. The feedback for branches is dealt with in Chapter 7.
2.1 In this chapter, we summarise the feedback we received on our proposed rules and
guidance for applying Senior Management Functions (SMFs) and our response. Our proposals
2.2 In CP17/25, we proposed applying the following SMFs to Core and Enhanced firms
where they have individuals performing the relevant roles:

SMF1 – Chief Executive
SMF3 – Executive Director
SMF27 – Partner
SMF9 – Chair
SMF16 – Compliance Oversight
SMF17 – Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO)
2.3 We proposed applying a streamlined set of Senior Management Functions to Limited
Scope firms, and additional Senior Management Functions for Enhanced firms.
2.4 We also proposed applying the following Prescribed Responsibilities (PRs) that must be
allocated to Senior Managers in Core and Enhanced firms:
Table 2: Prescribed Responsibilities
Handbook PR Ref. Description
All Core and Enhanced Firms
(a) Performance by the firm of its obligations under the SMR, including implementation and oversight (b) Performance by the firm of its obligations under the Certification Regime (b-1) Performance by the firm of its obligations in respect of notifications and training of the Conduct Rules (d) Responsibility for the firm’s policies and procedures for countering the risk that the firm might be used to further financial crime

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Handbook PR Ref. Description (z) Responsibility for the firm’s compliance with CASS (if applicable) Authorised Fund Managers (za) Responsibility for an AFM’s value for money assessments, independent director representation and acting in investors’ best interests. This PR only applies to AFMs. For more details, see CP17/18, MS15/2.3 – Asset Management Market Study: Final Report and PS18/8. Enhanced Firms (c) Compliance with the rules relating to the firm’s Responsibilities Map (j) Safeguarding and overseeing the independence and performance of the internal audit function (in accordance with SYSC 6.2) (k) Safeguarding and overseeing the independence and performance of the compliance function (in accordance with SYSC 6.1) (l) Safeguarding and overseeing the independence and performance of the risk function (in accordance with SYSC 7.1.21R and SYSC 7.1.22R) (j-3) If the firm outsources its internal audit function, taking reasonable steps to make sure that every person involved in the performance of the service is independent from the persons who perform external audit, including:

supervision and management of the work of outsourced internal auditors
management of potential conflicts of interest between the provision of
external audit and internal audit services (t) Developing and maintaining the firm’s business model (s) Managing the firm’s internal stress‑tests and ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of information provided to the FCA for stress‑testing
2.5 In CP17/25, we also proposed a PR for ensuring that the governing body is informed
of its legal and regulatory obligations. We have not included this in Table 2 because we are removing this PR following consultation. Read our response on p. 20 for more information.
2.6 We proposed that PRs would not apply to Limited Scope firms, and that additional PRs
would apply to Enhanced firms.
Senior Management Functions in the Core tier Feedback received Q1: Does the proposed list of Senior Managers in the Core regime cover the appropriate roles, ie the most senior decision makers within a firm? Q2: Are there any other roles that the FCA should consider specifying as SMFs? Q3: Are there any proposed Senior Managers that the FCA should consider excluding from the Core regime?

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
2.7 Most respondents supported the list of SMFs proposed for the Core tier and agreed
we had taken a proportionate approach to Core firms.
Scope of Senior Management Functions
2.8 Most respondents agreed that the proposed Senior Manager roles covered the most
senior decision‑makers. They felt that adding too many SMF roles would increase complexity and firms’ costs. Some respondents asked us to create sector‑specific SMFs. We were also asked to consider providing the option for firms to choose to have extra SMFs.
2.9 Some respondents thought that larger or more complex Core firms may have people
doing jobs more suited to the functions defined in the Enhanced tier. They felt that the proposals concentrate responsibility on a narrow group of executives. They argued that additional SMFs would help reflect the scale and complexity of these businesses. Suggestions for additional SMFs in the Core tier included:

the Enhanced SMF functions equivalent to the CF28 – Systems & Controls function
under APR, ie Chief Finance (SMF2), Chief Risk (SMF4) and Head of Internal Audit (SMF5)
the SMF24 – Chief Operations Function
the SMF18 – Overall Responsibility Function
the SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager Function
2.10 One respondent thought the proposals created too much bias towards second line
functions by excluding managers of major business units but including roles such as the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO). Requests for clarification
2.11 Respondents asked us to clarify if:
we required an SMF9 – Chair to be a Non‑Executive Director
the term ‘required functions’ meant that firms needed to appoint people to fill these
roles where they don’t currently have them, and how two of these roles (SMF16 – Compliance Oversight and SMF17 – MLRO) apply to specific firm types
all types of partners fall within the definition of the SMF27 – Partner function
membership of the management body or holding a title matching that of an SMF
would automatically make an individual a Senior Manager
they could apply the regime at a group level
individuals performing two or more SMFs would require multiple approvals.

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Our response Additional Senior Management Functions Most respondents agreed with our proposals to apply a streamlined set of SMFs to Core firms. As such, we are confirming the list of functions we consulted on and are not applying any additional functions to these firms. We think this is proportionate and focuses accountability on the most senior people in firms. It isn’t intended to change how firms organise themselves. For example, even though the Systems & Controls Function will no longer be approved by us in Core firms, firms can still have someone performing this role. In addition, the Certification Regime may, and the Conduct Rules will, apply to these individuals – for example, as a Material Risk Taker or the Significant Management Function. We think this is sufficient to improve conduct and enhance accountability in these roles. Respondents asked whether they could apply the Enhanced Senior Management Functions, even if they were in the Core tier. We have designed the requirements in the Enhanced tier to work as a package. We have, for example, combined a requirement for Overall Responsibility with a requirement for Responsibilities Maps and the ability to use SMF18 as an additional ‘catch all’ function. We don’t propose to allow firms to only adopt parts of the Enhanced tier. We think this could obscure accountability if there is only an ad hoc application of the Enhanced rules and make it more complicated for us to supervise firms. We will, however, make it easier for firms to opt into the Enhanced tier as a whole. See
page 55 for more detail on this.
Definitions of Senior Management Functions Each Senior Management Function has a specific definition that is set out in SUP 10C of our Handbook. Firms should consider the definitions of each SMF when thinking about if and how they apply. For example, the fact that someone has the title of director doesn’t mean that they will necessarily hold the Executive Director SMF – they need to meet the definition of an Executive Director in our rules. Similarly, members of an Executive Committee are not automatically Senior Managers. The SMR will only apply if the individuals on the committee meet one of the SMF definitions – for example, an Executive Director. We confirm that the SM&CR rules allow a firm’s Chair to be either Executive or Non‑Executive. Required functions The term ‘required function’ is an existing definition under APR that we proposed carrying over to the SM&CR. It’s intended to categorise those functions that we require some types of firms to have under other sections of our Handbook. For example, under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II, some firms need to have a Compliance Oversight Function. Some firms don’t currently need to comply with these requirements and the SMR doesn’t change this. For example, if a firm doesn’t need to have someone in the Compliance Oversight or MLRO functions under the APR, they won’t need to under

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms the SM&CR. Firms should already know whether these functions apply to them or not. Holding more than one Senior Management Function As set out in CP17/25, if a person performs more than one SMF, they will need to apply for approval for each function. This can be done at the same time and using the same Form A for all functions. Group application The SM&CR applies to legal entities, rather than to groups. This is set out in FSMA. As such, we don’t have discretion to take a group‑wide approach to applying the SM&CR. Instead, we will allow firms to opt into the Enhanced tier if they wish. We have set out more detail on this in our answer to Q21, in Chapter 6. This should allow groups to take a consistent approach across different legal entities if they wish to. The SM&CR is designed to be proportionate, so firms should only opt up if they are prepared to apply and comply with the extra requirements of the Enhanced tier. There is no expectation on firms to opt into the Enhanced tier for the sake of having more SMFs. Partners Only partners that meet the definition of the SMF fall under the Senior Managers Regime. As we set out in CP17/25, we think most partners will have some involvement in managing a firm, although we recognise that this won’t be the case in every partnership. It is for firms to decide whether a Partner performs an SMF, based on our rules and guidance in SUP 10C.5. The guidance in the Handbook allows firms to consider other circumstances which may mean a partner does not meet the SMF definition. If a firm’s principal purpose isn’t to carry on regulated activities (eg a professional services firm), then the partner function only applies to the extent that a partner has responsibility for a regulated activity. For example, the partner function won’t apply if a partner’s regulated activities are only incidental to their professional services. Our rules and guidance in SUP 10C.5.19 and 10C.5.20 contain more detail on this. Before they move from the APR to the SM&CR, we encourage firms to consider whether partners currently approved under CF4 – Partner Function meet the SMF definition. If they don’t, then Core firms will need to submit a Form C to cancel that Partner’s approval. Enhanced firms can simply leave this individual out of their submitted Form K and the individual’s function will not be converted.

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Senior Management Functions in the Limited Scope tier Feedback received Q4: Do you agree with our approach to Senior Management Functions for Limited Scope Firms? If not, please explain why.
2.12 Most respondents supported the list of SMFs proposed for the Limited Scope tier.
2.13 However, some considered the criteria for identifying Limited Scope Firms were
unsuitable. They suggested that only using regulatory permissions could create an uneven playing field for similar firms who would fall in the Core tier. For example, two firms offering consumer credit could have different permissions, but only one would be Limited Scope. They felt that the conduct risk posed by consumer credit and insurance intermediary firms meant the Core tier should apply to them in all cases.
2.14 Other suggestions included expanding the firms under the Limited Scope tier to
include all authorised professional firms (APFs), sole traders with up to 4 employees, or owner managed businesses.
2.15 Respondents also asked us to clarify how the regime applies to
Appointed Representatives.
Our response
We are implementing the SMFs for Limited Scope firms as consulted on. Criteria for Limited Scope firms The criteria for Limited Scope firms mirrors how the APR applies at the moment. Under the APR, firms with certain permissions don’t need to apply some of the controlled functions. We think this is proportionate and reflects the different risks and business models of firms with these types of permissions. As these are permissions‑based, we don’t think this will create an uneven playing field. This is because firms with the same permissions will have the same elements of the SM&CR apply to them. The fundamental requirements of the SM&CR apply in the same way to almost all firms. Senior Managers are approved by the FCA and are subject to the Duty of Responsibility and the Certification Regime and the Conduct Rules apply to almost all firms. All these elements combined will increase individual accountability and improve standards of conduct, whether a firm falls in the Limited Scope, Core or Enhanced tier. We considered whether it was appropriate to amend the rules to make all APFs Limited Scope but have decided to maintain the existing criteria for limited application of the APR in the move to the SM&CR. This is because we think only those APFs that do non‑mainstream regulated activities should fall in the Limited Scope tier. It is highly unlikely that these firms will need to apply the Certification Regime or Conduct Rules to staff whose roles that have nothing to do with financial services or regulated

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms activities. However, it is for APFs to make their own assessment of whether or not individuals conduct activities that bring them into the scope of the Certification Regime or Conduct Rules. All sole traders are already in the Limited Scope tier, even if they have employees. Appointed Representatives There are some changes that will interest Appointed Representatives (ARs) of firms. However, the extension of the SM&CR proposed in CP17/25 doesn’t affect individuals and Approved Persons working at ARs. This is because the relevant legislation doesn’t give us the power to extend the SM&CR to ARs. As a result, the provisions of the APR and the relevant APR controlled functions still apply to ARs. Principal firms remain fully responsible for their ARs and networks meeting our rules. Senior Managers at these firms must make sure that this happens. One exception is for Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms that also act as ARs for other business (eg a limited permission credit broker that is also an AR for insurance business). These firms fall within scope of the extended SM&CR as they are authorised firms. Required functions Limited Scope Firms may need to have a Compliance Oversight Function or MLRO under another section of our Handbook. If they don’t, then firms don’t have to appoint people to these roles for the SM&CR. Senior Management Functions in the Enhanced tier Feedback received Q22: Do you agree with our proposed Senior Management Functions for Enhanced firms? Q23: Do you agree that this will ensure the most senior people in firms are covered by the Senior Managers Regime, regardless of organisational structure? If not, please explain why.
2.16 The majority of respondents supported the list of SMFs proposed for the
Enhanced tier.
2.17 Some respondents suggested that we include extra functions within the Enhanced
tier. These included:

Chief Credit Risk Officer
Chief Information and/or Technology Officer

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

Chief Investment Officer
Head of Human Resources
all Non‑Executive Directors
a number of sector‑specific SMFs
the Chair of the Conduct Committee
2.18 There was a concern that the proposals won’t work at group level if the subsidiaries of
regulated firms don’t have independent Board and Committee frameworks. Another respondent suggested that the Enhanced tier does not reflect how the investment management industry operates because these firms will typically be structured by ‘function’ or ‘centre for excellence’ on a group rather than entity basis.
2.19 Some respondents asked us to clarify the difference between functions. For example,
differences between the Head of Internal Audit and the Chair of the Audit Committee, and the Senior Independent Director and the Chair.
2.20 One respondent suggested that we shouldn’t make chairs of committees SMFs,
as these individuals may already be covered under other SMF roles. We were also asked how the SM&CR applies to Company Secretaries and whether the SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager Function can act as Chair of the subsidiaries without separate approval.
2.21 There was a call for greater alignment between the PRA and FCA definitions of the
Chief Operations Function (SMF24). One respondent noted that the PRA currently allow the SMF24 function to be split across a maximum of 3 people. Another respondent suggested that the FCA introduce a PR for operational continuity instead of SMF24 for both FCA and the PRA regimes.
2.22 We were asked to consider applying the PRA Head of Key Business Area Function
(SMF6) to Enhanced Firms as it was suggested this could be more appropriate than SMF18 – Other Overall Responsibility Function. One respondent suggested that we should review the potential overlap between the definition of SMF18 and the Significant Management Function under the Certification Regime. Many respondents requested clarity on the status of the Head of the Legal Function.
2.23 We were asked whether the SM&CR would force firms to have committees they
haven’t needed to in the past, as a result of making some Chairs of Committees SMFs.
2.24 Respondents asked us:
how the functions of the Chair of the Risk and Audit Committees apply to firms if
they don’t have Non‑Executive Directors
for more guidance on identifying SMFs where there is a parent/subsidiary
relationship between different entities that will come under the SM&CR
2.25 We received some feedback that updating the Statements of Responsibilities following
significant changes was too burdensome.

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Our response Additional Senior Management Functions We have considered the feedback and decided to implement the SMFs for the Enhanced tier as proposed in CP17/25. We believe using SMF18 for Enhanced firms is the best way to capture individuals with Overall Responsibility for a firm’s business area or activity of the firm if they aren’t performing another SMF. Many different types of firms come in scope of the FCA’s regime, so we think this function gives Enhanced firms the flexibility to apply the SMR without having to specify a series of detailed roles. This allows firms to allocate Overall Responsibility in way that reflects their business models and governance structures in the way they consider is most appropriate. We believe that the Enhanced tier reflects how investment management firms operate. The regime has been designed so that the functions apply where the firm has someone performing these roles, allowing it to accommodate different business models. SMF18 lets firms apply the SMR to someone with Overall Responsibility for an area if they have not already been captured as a Senior Manager under another specified function. We would only expect the Company Secretary to be approved as a Senior Manager if they either:

carry out another SMF
hold Overall Responsibility for an activity, business area or
management function
SMF18 and Significant Management Function The Other Overall Responsibility Function (SMF18) will apply if someone has Overall Responsibility for any of the activities, business areas or management functions of an Enhanced firm, and are not already performing another SMF. Firms won’t need to apply the Significant Management Function to this individual under the Certification Regime if the management of their business unit comes within their SMF. The Significant Management Function will apply to senior staff that have significant responsibility for a significant business unit, but who don’t have Overall Responsibility for that area in the firm. This may include, for example, an individual managing a significant part of the firm’s business, reporting to a Senior Manager. Senior Management Function definitions Our Handbook sets out the definitions of each SMF. We have considered respondents’ feedback and believe the definitions clearly distinguish between the different types of functions. For example, the Head of Internal Audit is an executive management role, whereas the Chair of the Audit Committee is an oversight and review role, often performed by a Non‑Executive (but not always).

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Director functions Our Handbook definitions of the Chairs of Committees under SUP 10C.5A don’t mandate whether these must be held by Executive or Non‑Executive Directors. There may be other requirements or good governance practices that dictate whether these Chair roles are held by a Non‑Executive or Executive Director. The SMR is designed to accommodate both. We recognise that if a Chair role is currently held by an Executive Director, this person will already have been approved under the APR Director Function (CF1). This function will be converted to the Executive Director Function (SMF3) and the individual will need to apply separately for the SMF9 – Chair function. They will need to hold both functions to act as Executive Chair. We still require approval for each of the functions an individual holds as this will make the roles they perform clearer. Firms should include all of an individual’s responsibilities in the one Statement of Responsibilities (SoR). Groups Under FSMA we need to apply the SM&CR on a legal entity basis. We recognise that many Enhanced firms will be part of a wider group, so we have designed the regime to accommodate complex groups and matrix structures as much as possible, using, for example, the SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager Function. If a firm’s structure prevents it from clearly allocating responsibilities, this suggests there is risk that the firm should address. Because Enhanced firms will need to allocate ‘Overall Responsibility’, this may mean that some firms will need to formalise existing arrangements between the Board and individuals so that the individual becomes a Senior Manager of the legal entity. For example, if the Board has delegated Overall Responsibility for a function to someone outside the legal entity. We don’t want to prescribe what sort of arrangement would be needed to formalise an individual’s responsibilities, but this might be through a contract of employment or through formal board delegation. Committee Chairs Firms don’t have to set up committees as a result of the SM&CR. It is only where firms have these committees – whether because they are required to under other rules or because they choose to – that the Chair will be a Senior Manager. We have made this clearer in our guidance in SUP10C. Chief Operations Function In CP17/40 we proposed extra guidance in SUP 10C about the areas of responsibility we would expect to be relevant to the Chief Operations Function. This guidance more closely aligns the role with the current SMF24 – Chief Operations Function for banks and insurers. We have not proposed a PR for operations because this would require all firms to allocate this responsibility in a specific way. The Chief Operations Function gives firms more flexibility to meet our requirements in a way

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms that reflects their business model and governance structure. It does not require firms to hire someone to fill the Chief Operations role. In SUP 10C.6B we have set out a number of examples of how the SMF24 – Chief Operations Function could apply. We don’t expect or require firms to change how they currently allocate responsibility for managing their internal operations or technology. Instead, the function will clarify how this responsibility is allocated within the firm. We don’t insist that all these responsibilities are held by one person and the examples in the guidance recognise this. Head of Legal CP17/25 highlights that the Overall Responsibility requirement currently includes the legal function (ie there is no specific exemption for this function). This policy is under review following industry feedback and the position will be clarified by a further consultation before the rules in this PS come into force. We will make final rules on this issue before the start of the SM&CR for solo‑regulated firms. Significant changes and Statements of Responsibilities Every Senior Manager must have a SoR, and update it whenever there is a significant change to their responsibilities. This is a requirement that comes from legislation. To help firms, we have provided some examples in SUP 10C.11.6 of potential changes which could trigger the need to resubmit a Statement of Responsibilities using Form J. A Senior Manager will need to have one SoR for every firm where they perform an SMF. If a Senior Manager performs multiple SMFs in a single firm, this should all be included in the one SoR. If someone performs SMFs in different firms across a group, they will need one SoR for every firm (legal entity) within it. Prescribed Responsibilities in the Core tier Feedback received Q5: Do you agree with our proposed list of Prescribed Responsibilities? If not, please explain why.
2.26 In CP17/25, we proposed 6 responsibilities (‘Prescribed Responsibilities’) that
must be given to Senior Managers. We also outlined an additional responsibility for Authorised Fund Managers (AFMs) in CP17/18. These responsibilities are intended to ensure a Senior Manager is accountable for the SM&CR and for key conduct and prudential risks.
2.27 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposed list of Prescribed
Responsibilities (PRs). Some suggested that we use the same PRs for both Core and Enhanced firms.
2.28 There were some concerns with our proposals for the PR for informing the
governing body of legal and regulatory obligations. Respondents thought that it was

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms inappropriate to assign this responsibility to one individual. In many firms, this is divided across different individuals such as the Company Secretary, the General Counsel and the Compliance Officer.
2.29 Several respondents felt that in small firms the CEO and Compliance Oversight
Function will be given most of the responsibilities. We were asked to clarify whether PRs should be allocated to the most appropriate Senior Manager that sits on the Board. Similarly, some respondents asked us to expand on our expectations of sharing PRs.
2.30 Some respondents suggested that we widen the list of PRs to cover areas such as
culture, complaints handling and risk management.
2.31 There were requests for clarity about whether firms need to assign the PR for the
Certification Regime if firms have no Certified Staff. One respondent asked if the PR for Conduct Rules extended to Appointed Representatives, or whether it is limited to ‘own staff’ of a firm. Our response Legal and Regulatory obligations PR We have considered the feedback we received on the PR for legal and regulatory obligations. We agree with respondents’ concerns that this may not be appropriate to allocate to one Senior Manager in solo‑regulated firms. We have therefore removed this PR from our near‑final rules. Under the Conduct Rules, Senior Managers must already ensure that the business area for which they are accountable complies with the relevant requirements and is controlled effectively. We consider this is adequate to balance out any risks from removing this PR. Who to allocate PRs to It is for firms to consider which Senior Manager is the best person to hold each PR. PRs should not be shared across different lines of defence. For example, one of the PRs that must be allocated by Core firms is responsibility for the firm’s policies and procedures for countering the risk that the firm might be used to further financial crime. If an SMF3 – Executive Director of a firm is accountable for the firm’s policies and procedures on financial crime, we would expect the PR to be allocated to that individual, even if the firm’s compliance function also supports by providing oversight of these policies and procedures. In this scenario, we would not expect the PR to be split or shared between the SMF3 – Executive Director and the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight. If the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight wishes to specify that their areas of responsibility include oversight of the firm’s policies and procedures on financial crime, this could be included in the “Supplementary Information” section of their SoR. When allocating PRs firms will need to think about which Senior Manager is the most senior person accountable for an issue. For example, if the person performing the SMF17 – MLRO is not responsible for all aspects

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms of financial crime, then the PR for financial crime should not be allocated to this person. It must instead be allocated to the Senior Manager accountable for all financial crime matters. We confirm that Core firms are not required to allocate PRs to only those Senior Managers who sit on the Board. Does the Certification PR apply if there are no Certification Functions? We recognise that there will be firms without any Certified Staff. However, the PR for the firm’s performance of its obligations under the Certification Regime still needs to be allocated. This is because the firm still needs to identify whether there are employees carrying out Certification Functions. There should be a Senior Manager accountable for this. Dividing and Sharing Prescribed Responsibilities We don’t consider that dividing and sharing PRs should be a common practice across firms. But we do recognise that there might be limited circumstances where this can happen. Firms must be able to show that this is appropriate and justifiable and that it doesn’t leave a gap or create an overlap in responsibilities. Additional Prescribed Responsibilities and ‘Culture’ PR Most responses to the consultation agreed with our proposed list of PRs. As such, we don’t propose applying any additional PRs to Core firms. We think this is proportionate and focuses accountability on key conduct and prudential risks. We haven’t introduced a PR for culture as we consider every individual in a firm to be accountable for the firm’s culture, from the governing body down. This reinforces our own focus on culture and governance, and is one of our top priorities for firms.4 In addition, all Senior Managers have a particular role to play in driving an appropriate culture and should take accountability for their actions, shaping the firm’s culture by taking accountability for their own behaviour and taking reasonable steps to manage the behaviour of those in their area of responsibility. Culture will also be reinforced by applying the Conduct Rules throughout every level of a firm. The Conduct Rules aim to drive up standards of individual behaviour in financial services and shape a firm’s culture, standards and policies as a whole. We view this responsibility holistically. So we also think that Boards should be collectively responsible for setting and monitoring firms’ cultures. Boards need to ensure culture remains high on their agenda and be able to demonstrate how they satisfy themselves that the firm’s culture does not cause harm. 4 In March 2018 we published a Discussion Paper on transforming culture in financial services. This is part of our drive to promote a discussion and consensus on the essential features of a healthy culture within financial services. For more information, read DP18/2 – ‘Transforming Culture in Financial Services’.

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Scope of the Conduct Rule Prescribed Responsibility The scope of individuals covered by the PR for the Conduct Rules is the same as how the Conduct Rules apply to the firm. We have addressed the scope of staff under the Conduct Rules in Chapter 5. Prescribed Responsibility for Authorised Fund Managers Feedback received Q6: Do you agree with our proposed Prescribed Responsibility for AFMs as set out in CP17/18? If not, please explain why.
2.32 In CP17/25, we proposed a PR for Authorised Fund Managers (AFMs). CP17/18
described the responsibility for an AFM’s value for money assessments, independent director representation and acting in investors’ best interests.
2.33 Respondents agreed with our proposed PR. Some requested clarity on the allocation
of this PR. They asked if it should be allocated to an Executive or a Non–Executive Director. They also requested clarity on whether this PR should be allocated to the SMF9 – Chairman.
2.34 Some respondents felt that introducing the PR would result in Compliance Officers
challenging less in owner‑managed firms, because this PR can only be exercised by senior executives.
2.35 A small number of respondents suggested an additional PR for managing conflicts of
interest where investment management companies manage investments for retail clients, institutions or other entities within their group.
2.36 One suggestion was that we split this PR into two separate PRs to cover the following
two responsibilities:

AFMs’ value for money assessment and acting in the investors best interest
appointing an independent director
Requests for clarification
2.37 One respondent asked whether the PR for value for money, independent director
representation and acting in investors’ best interests would only apply to AFMs.
2.38 Several others queried how much the value for money process is a collective Board
responsibility, or an individual one.
2.39 One respondent asked if the individual holding the SMF14 – Senior Independent
Director Function can hold the PR for an AFM’s value for money assessments, independent director representation and acting in investors’ best interests.

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Our response We set out our intention to implement the AFM PR in PS18/8.5 This PR will take effect from the start of the extended SM&CR. The AFM PR forms part of remedies coming out of the Asset Management Market Study. It only applies to Authorised Fund Managers and, where the firm has an individual approved in the SMF9 – Chair function, the PR should be allocated to this individual. Where an AFM doesn’t have an SMF9 – Chair, they must assign the PR to another appropriate Senior Manager. The Asset Management Market Study remedies assign all three elements of this PR to the Chair. We don’t consider it appropriate to sub‑divide them. In CP17/18, we noted that there are benefits to appointing either an executive or independent member of the board as Chair. We consulted on rules that would allow an AFM Board to make this decision itself. The SMF9 – Chair role can be either executive or non‑executive. In PS18/8 we explained that value for money assessments should not focus purely on costs. Fund charges should take into account the context around the whole service provided. Managing conflicts of interest is important and should be included in a Senior Manager’s SoR if it forms a significant part of their role. Prescribed Responsibilities in the Enhanced tier Feedback received Q24: Do you agree with our proposals for Prescribed Responsibilities in Enhanced firms? If not, please explain why.
2.40 CP17/25 proposed applying an additional seven PRs for Senior Managers in Enhanced
firms, on top of the Core PRs.
2.41 The majority of respondents supported the list of PRs proposed for Enhanced firms.
2.42 Some respondents suggested that we allow individuals holding the SMF18 – Other
Overall Responsibility to be allocated PRs other than CASS compliance.
2.43 Several respondents didn’t think that firms should allocate the PR for developing and
maintaining the firm’s business model to a single individual. They argued that this should be a collective responsibility allocated to the Board. They asked us to explain how we will measure reasonable steps for this PR.
2.44 One suggestion was to create a single set of PRs for both Core and Enhanced Firms.
The same respondent recommended aligning PRs for solo‑regulated firms, insurers 5 PS 18/8 – Asset Management Market Study remedies and changes to the handbook

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms and the PRA list. This would create a common set of PRs across both solo and dual‑regulated firms.
2.45 There were some questions over the oversight PRs and the PR for managing the firm’s
internal stress‑tests. Respondents asked if they would apply to Enhanced firms that are exempt from the relevant requirements in the SYSC section of our Handbook. Our response We are implementing the PRs for Enhanced firms as consulted on. Overall Responsibility and PRs In CP17/25, we proposed applying an ‘Overall Responsibility’ requirement to all Enhanced firms. This means that an Enhanced firm will need to ensure that every activity, business area and management function has a Senior Manager with Overall Responsibility for it. This is to prevent unclear allocation of responsibilities that could result in issues falling between the cracks. The most senior person with Overall Responsibility might already be an existing Senior Manager. Our proposals noted that we expected this to be the case most of the time. As we didn’t receive feedback that disagreed with this, we are maintaining the position as consulted on and consider it appropriate to restrict the allocation of other Prescribed Responsibilities (other than the CASS compliance) to the SMF18. This will reinforce a culture of accountability and encourage firms to identify who actually has Overall Responsibility at the most senior level, for each of its activities, business areas and management functions. Prescribed Responsibility for developing and maintaining the firm’s business model The specific accountabilities of individual Senior Managers add to and complement the collective responsibility shared by directors as members of the Board. Ultimately, the Board remains collectively accountable for developing and maintaining the firm’s business model. The PR for the business model provides further focus on this and ensures that this does not ‘fall between the cracks’. We expect the Senior Manager with the PR for developing and maintaining the firm’s business model to give directors the time and opportunity to contribute to develop the firm’s business model, and to provide appropriate challenge, before final sign‑off by the Board. Prescribed Responsibilities for both Core and Enhanced firms We have deliberately taken a different approach to the requirements that apply to Core firms and Enhanced firms. This is because of the breadth of the population that will now come under the extended SM&CR. Additional PRs apply to Enhanced firms to reflect the specific risks in relation to governance in larger firms. For example, a number are designed to be held by Senior Managers that chair key committees. We don’t believe it would be proportionate or practical to apply the Enhanced PRs to all Core firms.

PS18/14
Chapter 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Prescribed Responsibilities connected to underlying requirements There are some PRs that only apply if the firm is subject to the underlying requirement in SYSC. This is set out in the description of the PRs in SYSC 24.2.6. For example, the PR for managing the firm’s internal stress tests only applies to a firm to which SYSC 20 applies. In addition, the CASS PR only applies to a firm to which CASS applies.

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 3 Certification Regime Who should read this chapter? All firms should read this chapter. Our proposals
3.1 In CP17/25 we proposed 8 Certification Functions, building on existing functions in
the Approved Persons Regime. These functions apply to all firms where they have individuals performing the roles.
3.2 The Certification Regime covers people who aren’t Senior Managers, but whose jobs
mean they can have a significant impact on customers, the firm or market integrity. We won’t approve these individuals, but firms will need to check and confirm (‘certify’) at least once a year that these people are suitable to do their job. This is a requirement under FSMA.
Table 3: Certification Functions
Certification Function Overview
Significant Management
Function (current CF29)
These individuals perform functions that would have been Significant Influence Functions under the APR. These important roles can seriously affect how the firm conducts its business. Proprietary traders (also covered by current CF29) CASS Oversight Function (current CF10a) Functions subject to qualification requirements This includes, for example, mortgage advisers, retail investment advisers and pension transfer specialists. The full list is set out in our Training and Competence Sourcebook. The client dealing function This function has been expanded from the CF30 function under APR to apply to any person dealing with clients, including retail and professional clients and eligible counterparties. This will cover people who:

advise on investments (other than a non‑investment insurance contract)
and perform other related functions, such as dealing and arranging
deal, as principal or agent, and arrange (bring about) deals in investments
act in the capacity of an investment manager and all functions connected
with this
act as a bidder’s representative

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Certification Function Overview Anyone who supervises or manages a Certified Function (directly or indirectly), but isn’t a Senior Manager This will ensure that people who supervise certified employees are held to the same standard of accountability. It also ensures a clear chain of accountability between junior certified employees and the Senior Manager ultimately responsible for that area. For example, if a firm employs a customer‑facing financial adviser, every manager above them in the same chain of responsibility will have to be certified (until the Senior Manager approved under the SMR is reached). Material Risk Takers The concept of Material Risk Takers (also known as Remuneration Code staff) already exists for firms under our remuneration rules (SYSC 19). They are a category of staff that all firms under AIFMD, UCITS, IFPRU and BIPRU are already required to identify under our remuneration regime. These firms need to consider all types of risk when identifying their Material Risk Takers. This includes prudential, operational, conduct and reputational risks. All of these Material Risk Takers will be covered by this certification function. Algorithmic trading This function includes people with responsibility for:

approving the deployment of a trading algorithm or a material part of one
approving the deployment of a material amendment to a trading
algorithm or a material part of one, or the combination of trading algorithms
monitoring or deciding whether or not the use or deployment of a trading
algorithm is or remains compliant with the firm’s obligations
3.3 We also asked for feedback on whether individuals performing these functions should
appear on a public register.
3.4 This chapter sets out the feedback received to our proposed:
Certification Functions
territorial application of the Certification Regime
3.5 We included feedback on whether details of Certified Staff should be included on
a public register in the proposals made in CP18/19 - 'Introducing the Directory'. We don’t address it here. Certification Functions Feedback received Q7: Do you agree with the functions we have proposed making Certification Functions? If not, please explain why. Q8: Are there any other functions that we should make a Certification Function?
3.6 The majority of respondents supported our proposed Certification Functions.

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
3.7 A number of respondents felt that the breadth of individuals in scope of the
Certification Regime was not proportionate. One respondent suggested that the term ‘significant harm function’ should be replaced with ‘significant responsibility function’.
3.8 Others noted that the new definition of the Client Dealing Function could extend the
Certified population to include relevant junior and call centre staff. Some suggested that the Certified population should only capture current CF30s or other roles such as mortgage advisers, staff involved in designing products sold to retail investors, and anyone approving financial promotions.
3.9 There was a concern that certain roles were excluded from the Certification Regime.
Respondents suggested including people handling complaints and corporate finance activity. They proposed a number of additional Certification Functions. We were asked to clarify whether a range of roles, including those at Appointed Representatives, were in scope of the Certification Regime. Commonly suggested functions included:

Head of HR
Complaints Handling
Head of Product Design
Non‑SMF Partners
3.10 Several respondents commented that the definition of the term ‘Material Risk Taker’
(MRT) differs under UCITS, AIFMD and CRD, and suggested aligning these. Another said that the MRT definition can cause the MRT populations to vary each year.
3.11 Some respondents wanted us to provide guidance on how firms should decide if
someone is performing the Significant Management Function.
3.12 Concerns were raised about the practical implementation of Certification in
firms where regulated activities form a small part of the overall business. Another respondent asked whether individuals undertaking unregulated activities should be certified.
3.13 More information was requested on how a firm should decide whether someone
should be a Senior Manager or certified. Some respondents felt that this is particularly difficult where they have flat organisational structures. We were also asked whether contractors and secondees should be certified.
3.14 Another respondent asked that the 4 week period for emergency appointments to
certification functions be extended to 12 weeks. This would then align with Senior Managers. Another suggested a transitional period for firms to certify staff, noting that some firms would have a large number of individuals to certify. Requests for clarification
3.15 Respondents asked us for more information on a number of points:
how Certification would apply to smaller firms
how to apply the Algorithmic Trading Function to firms that use a trading algorithm
provided by another firm

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

if ongoing Certification requires the same depth or detail as initial Certification
whether firms are required to certify individuals who perform multiple functions
across a group multiple times
how Training and Competence rules, which allow trainees to undertake a role under
supervision should be reconciled with the certification requirements Our response We are implementing the Certification Regime as consulted on. The Certification Regime The term ‘Significant Harm Function’ comes from FSMA. It describes a person performing these functions as someone ‘involved in one or more aspects of the firm's affairs, so far as relating to a regulated activity, and those aspects involve, or might involve, a risk of significant harm to the firm or any of its customers’. A ‘specified Significant Harm Function’ is a Significant Harm Function that has been specified by the FCA in rules. The Certification Regime applies to specified Significant Harm Functions. In our Handbook, we have changed the term to ‘FCA Certification Function’ instead. The regime only applies if the firm has individuals performing a Certification Function, where it relates to a regulated activity. It applies to individuals within a regulated firm who meet the definition of one or more Certification Functions. If a Senior Manager performs one of these roles and it isn’t related to their SMF, then they will also need to be certified. For example, if someone is approved as an SMF and also meets the definition of the Client Dealing Function under the Certification Regime, they must be certified for the latter function. In practice, once we have approved someone as an SMF, firms may decide to assess the individual’s fitness and propriety for both roles in one assessment on an ongoing basis or at least once a year. Certification is intended to ensure that firms assess their staff as fit and proper on a regular basis. It is for firms to decide the best way of meeting the requirements. Firms don’t need to adopt the same criteria for fitness and propriety regardless of a person’s seniority or role. We expect firms to act in a proportionate manner. This means that, for example, where a trainee retail investment adviser practises under supervision, they can be certified as fit and proper for the Client Dealing Function on the condition that they still meet basic standards and are supervised. We considered extending the 4 week emergency period to 12 weeks but have decided not to amend this rule. The 12 week period for Senior Managers reflects that processing a new approval takes time. Certification Functions don’t have to be approved by us, so firms should be able to complete the relevant certification processes in 4 weeks.

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Scope of the Client Dealing and Algorithmic Trading Functions The scope of the new Client Dealing function is broader than the CF30 – Customer Function under the APR. It covers anyone advising or dealing for clients, including retail and professional clients and eligible counterparties. This means that there will be staff who were not previously CF30s, but who will be performing the Client Dealing Function. It does not cover advising or arranging non‑investment insurance products. The Algorithmic Trading Function covers individuals with responsibility for:

approving the deployment of a trading algorithm or a material part
of one
approving the deployment of a material amendment to a trading
algorithm or a material part of one, or the combination of trading algorithms
monitoring or deciding whether or not the use or deployment of a
trading algorithm is or remains compliant with the firm’s obligations If firms use a third party algorithm, there must be someone in the firm accountable for the decision to use the algorithm, and for how the algorithm behaves on an ongoing basis. This may be the same person. Firms must be clear on this and who these people are, whether they develop their own algorithms or rely on third parties. Additional Certification Functions We have considered whether it would be appropriate to add extra Certification Functions. We have decided not to change the scope of this part of the regime. Many of the functions suggested by respondents are already included in the regime. For example, our guidance on the Significant Management Function specifically considers that this could include a senior person in human resources or complaints handling. We were also asked to consider applying the Certification Regime to non‑SMF Partners. Under FSMA the Certification Regime can only apply to employees and we are therefore unable to do this because partners are unlikely to meet the definition of ‘employee’ in FSMA 63E(9). The definition can, however, cover secondees and contractors. If they are performing Certification roles they must be certified. Clarifications The definition of ‘Material Risk Taker’ (MRT) is taken from European legislation on remuneration. Firms subject to these rules are already required to identify their Material Risk Takers. This is in line with these existing requirements and European legislation, and as such we don’t intend to change this.

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Firms and the appropriate Senior Manager are responsible for ensuring that there are effective certification processes. They must be satisfied that they have taken reasonable steps to comply with our requirements for fitness and propriety. This will include determining whether, in order to meet our requirements, ongoing certification needs to be as thorough as the assessment done at appointment. Individuals who perform Certification Functions across multiple group entities can be certified in a single process, but the assessment must take into account the performance of all the roles in the different entities. Certification – Territorial Application Feedback received Q10: Do you agree with our proposed territorial limitation for the Certification Regime? If not, please explain why.
3.16 Respondents broadly agreed with the proposal but highlighted the differences in
territorial scope between Senior Managers and Certification Functions. Others were concerned about the difficulties of applying and monitoring the ’30 day’ rule (where individuals should be certified if they work more than 30 days a year in the UK).
3.17 Some respondents were concerned that employees of a non‑UK firm to which
a UK firm has delegated a service would be captured. They felt this would be disproportionate. Others suggested extending the territorial scope of the Certification Regime.
3.18 Firms asked us to clarify if the Certification Regime applies to staff based abroad,
including individuals involved in client dealing.
Our response
We intend to apply the territorial scope of the regime as proposed. Firms must ensure that employees are certified if they perform a certification role and are either based in the UK (or spend more than 30 days a year in the UK) or deal with UK customers. There is no territorial limitation if the person is performing the MRT Certification Function for a UK firm. This is because, by their nature, Certification Functions are important roles that can cause harm. If staff are moving in and out of the UK performing these roles, it is important that they meet the necessary standards, and the 30-day window applies this principle proportionately to reflect short‑term moves within firms and groups in and out of the UK. These standards help protect UK consumers, the firm and the market. In CP17/25, we provided a flow chart summarising the application of the Certification Regime to overseas staff. Firms should refer to SYSC 27.3 for more information on territoriality.

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms If a firm outsources a service to an overseas entity, the application of the Certification Regime will depend on the nature of the outsourcing agreement. Generally, such individuals would not be in scope of the Certification Regime unless they meet the FSMA definition of an ‘employee’ of the firm outsourcing the service. This would include any individuals seconded to the firm from the outsourcing provider. CASS Responsibilities Feedback received Q11: Do you agree with the approach we have proposed to allocating CASS responsibilities? If not, please explain why.
3.19 Most respondents agreed with our approach of allocating the CASS PR.
Some disagreed with our proposal to include the CASS Operational Oversight Function (current CF10a) under the Certification Regime. In their view, the CASS Operational Oversight Function should be kept as an approved function. They felt that to do otherwise could reduce firms’ Boards attention on the importance of CASS compliance.
3.20 A few respondents disagreed with our example that the CASS PR will often be
allocated to the Senior Manager undertaking the Compliance Oversight role. They feel this contradicts previous FCA advice that the CASS and Compliance Oversight should be performed separately.
3.21 One respondent asked us to clarify whether firms can allocate the CASS oversight
function to multiple employees to allow for segregation of duties.
3.22 Some respondents asked how the CASS requirements under the SM&CR worked
with MiFID.
Our response
In CP17/25, we didn’t propose making the current CF10a or CASS Operational Oversight Function an SMF. This is because firms currently assign responsibility for client assets oversight in different ways. In some cases, the person performing this role may not meet the definition of a Senior Manager. For example, in larger firms the person familiar with the day‑to‑day operation of client money calculations may not be senior enough to influence strategic decisions around the budget and resources dedicated to CASS. In smaller firms they may be the same person. We have made Overall Responsibility for compliance with CASS a PR. This is because we want to ensure that there is always a Senior Manager with ultimate responsibility for overseeing a firm’s CASS obligations. This PR applies to all firms subject to CASS. As the person with day‑to‑day responsibility is not always a Senior Manager, the CASS Operational

PS18/14
Chapter 3
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Oversight Function forms part of the Certification Regime. This means that the person performing the CASS Operational Oversight Function will always be either certified or a Senior Manager. Firms are not allowed to allocate the CASS Operational Oversight Function to more than one person, unless it is done as part of a job‑share arrangement. This is governed by our rules in the CASS module of the Handbook. We expect firms to maintain a permanent and effective compliance function that operates independently from the firm’s business areas. The aim of the SM&CR is not to change how firms are organised or structured. Firms must decide who, in the context of the firm’s business model, is the most appropriate Senior Manager to be allocated the CASS PR. The SM&CR allows a firm to allocate both the CASS Prescribed Responsibility (in SYSC 24) and the CASS Operational Oversight Function (in CASS 1A) to a single Senior Manager. Where this is the case, a firm can allocate additional responsibilities to this person only if:

it can satisfy itself on reasonable grounds that this person is still able
to discharge his/her CASS oversight responsibilities effectively, and
the firm’s full compliance with CASS won’t be compromised

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 4 Fit and Proper Requirements Who should read this chapter? All firms should read this chapter. Our proposals
4.1 In CP17/25 we proposed new rules for how firms should assess whether people are fit
and proper to do their job. This includes Senior Managers, Non‑Executive Directors and individuals under the Certification Regime. The new rules include:

a requirement on firms to assess, at least annually, whether individuals in certain
roles are fit and proper for their role (except non-approved Non‑Executive Directors)
the evidence we expect firms to gather when making their assessment, including
requirements to:
– carry out criminal records checks as part of an application for approval of a Senior Manager – obtain regulatory references for Senior Managers, Certification Staff and non‑approved Non‑Executive Directors before appointing them
4.2 This chapter sets out the feedback we received on these topics and our response.
The Fit and Proper Test
Feedback received
Q12: Do you agree with our proposed approach to rules and guidance on the fit and proper test? If not, please explain why.
4.3 Most respondents agreed with our proposals on the fit and proper test. A few asked
us to clarify how firms should conduct the annual assessment. We were also asked for additional guidance to ensure consistency across the industry.
4.4 Some respondents were concerned about the administrative burden on small HR
functions. A few suggested that the FCA should conduct the annual fitness and propriety assessments, rather than firms. Some commented that it would be difficult to conduct fit and proper assessments on Non‑Executive Directors as they only attend a few Board meetings each year. There were also questions about how fit and proper assessments apply to sole traders, and whether our rules mean they would need to self‑certify.

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
4.5 One respondent suggested that smaller firms should only be required to conduct the
assessment every 3 years, rather than every year.
4.6 Some respondents thought that we should use this opportunity to link and consolidate
various regulatory competence requirements. These could include MIFID II, IDD, Board competence and guidelines issued by European Supervisory Authorities. Some felt that we should change the existing rules and guidance on fit and proper assessments and training and competence to improve standards of individual behaviour. They also suggested making it compulsory to undertake continuous professional development of skills and knowledge.
4.7 One respondent was concerned that our fit and proper requirements may not support
the recruitment of diverse candidates in leadership positions. There was also a concern this could discriminate against those with criminal convictions or older staff members with experience rather than formal training. Our response We are implementing the fit and proper requirements as consulted on. A key feature of the SM&CR is to reinforce that firms need to take more responsibility for their staff being fit and proper to do their jobs. This requirement stems from legislation and followed recommendations from the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (PCBS). Similarly, FSMA, rather than FCA rules, requires firms to assess fitness and propriety of their Senior Managers and Certification Staff at least annually. So we don’t have discretion to change this. It is for firms to decide how best to carry out their fit and proper assessments, based on the rules, guidance and evidence requirements set by the FCA. We haven’t provided prescriptive guidance on how firms should carry out these assessments as we consider firms best placed to decide how their internal employee assessments should be carried out. Firms should already have processes in place to assess the fitness and propriety of their employees and to monitor and record information about employees’ performance and suitability. They must also ensure that employees have the skills, knowledge and expertise necessary for their responsibilities, as required by the Competent Employees Rule and corresponding EU rules. We appreciate that firms must meet different regulations and requirements when considering the competence and behaviour of their staff. These can come from different regulatory bodies and may focus on the same objective, such as ensuring employees’ fitness and propriety. However, as these requirements are often specific to a firm’s activities or business and are drawn from EU legislation, we have not consolidated them into the SM&CR framework, which applies to all firms. We don’t consider that our expectation for people to be fit and proper will discriminate against the recruitment of diverse candidates. In our

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms view, the most important considerations that are relevant to fitness and propriety include:

honesty, integrity and reputation
competence and capability, and
financial soundness.
We don’t think that recruiting with these considerations in mind should affect staff diversity and they provide important protections. In addition, conviction for a criminal offence won’t automatically mean that someone isn’t fit and proper. We have guidance in FIT that makes it clear that this should be a case‑by‑case assessment. We haven’t introduced any new qualification requirements in the SM&CR or amended existing ones; these are all existing requirements. For those roles that do have specific qualification requirements, we think this is necessary and appropriate to ensure consumer protection. In practice, there will be few cases where sole traders will need to conduct a fit and proper assessment on themselves. This is because neither the governing SMFs nor the Certification Regime apply to a sole trader themselves, as opposed to their employees. If a sole trader does need to conduct a fit and proper assessment, the guidance in FIT will still be relevant. They won’t need the assessment to be verified by someone else. This is identical to the way the current APR operates for sole traders. Overall, we consider that applying the SM&CR as a package will drive up standards of individual behaviour and accountability and the assessments of whether people working in financial services are fit and proper are important parts of making this happen. Criminal Records Checks Feedback received Q13: Do you agree with our proposed requirements on criminal records checks? If not, please explain why.
4.8 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposals. However, several questioned
whether the proposals were consistent with privacy and data protection laws. Some said that Limited Scope Firms should not be required to conduct criminal records checks. On the other hand, several respondents thought that we should extend the criminal records checks to all Certification Functions. They argued this was appropriate as these are customer‑facing functions, and firms are limited in the information they can receive on individuals who are not Senior Managers.

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
4.9 Several respondents suggested that we shouldn’t ask for criminal records checks
if someone is moving roles within a firm. Some asked for clarity about how often a criminal records check should be conducted. One respondent asked if a criminal records check needed to be completed before an employee started with a firm.
4.10 We were also asked to explain when firms should make checks on individuals who have
worked overseas for any length of time, as this this can be a burdensome process.
4.11 Some respondents asked what types of convictions and offences would bar someone
from working in financial services. One suggested that there should also be checks on whether a director has ever been disqualified or has an undischarged bankruptcy. Respondents also asked if they need to notify us if an employee provides false information on a form.
4.12 Some respondents asked whether the Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS) had the
capacity to undertake these criminal records checks.
4.13 One respondent asked how these rules apply to not‑for‑profit firms.
Our response
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) We don’t think it’s appropriate for us to give detailed guidance on complying with the GDPR and the UK’s Data Protection Act 2018. However, we do want firms to be confident that they can comply with both the SM&CR and data protection laws. We don’t think these obligations conflict, as they acknowledge that employers have legal obligations to process sensitive personal data, such as criminal records. Firms may find it helpful to read Article 6 of the GDPR and Schedule One of the UK’s Data Protection Act to understand more. Criminal Records Checks Carrying out criminal records checks is an important tool for firms when assessing the fitness and propriety of Senior Managers, including as part of preparing the application to us for their approval. Almost all respondents agreed with this. We will, therefore, require a criminal records check for every application for a Senior Management Function, even if that person already performs a role in the firm or the group. We only require a criminal records check when a candidate is applying for an SMF. There is no requirement for annual criminal records checks, although firms can choose to do this as part of their ongoing fit and proper assessments. We have made this clearer in our Handbook in SUP 10C.10.23A. Given the number of staff who may fall in the Certification Regime, we don’t think it is proportionate to require criminal records checks for these roles. If a candidate for an SMF has spent considerable time overseas in the last six years, firms should consider carrying out a criminal records check in those particular jurisdictions. We provide guidance in the Handbook, but it is up to the firm to decide if this is appropriate. Candidates themselves

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms are asked to disclose all related matters, whether in the United Kingdom or overseas, in our forms. Guidance in FIT makes it clear that conviction for a criminal offence won’t automatically mean someone can’t be considered fit and proper – this is a case‑by‑case assessment. If a candidate provides false information on a form, a firm should consider this when deciding on the individual’s honesty, integrity and reputation. If someone who is currently employed by the firm provides false information, this could also be a breach of the Conduct Rules. Firms need to report breaches of Conduct Rules resulting in disciplinary action to us annually, using REP008 on GABRIEL. We confirm that FIT already contains guidance that firms should consider whether a person has ever been disqualified from acting as a director or has an undischarged bankruptcy. While we appreciate that a firm's hiring needs can be urgent, we think that the criminal records check is one of the key checks that a firm needs to make in order to assess a Senior Manager as Fit & Proper. In order for a firm to submit an application for a Senior Manager to be approved, the criminal records check must be complete. We have discussed our requirements in this area with the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS), as well as the likely increase in requests for criminal records checks it will receive. Not‑For‑Profit firms If a not‑for‑profit firm is in scope of the SM&CR and has someone performing an SMF, then criminal records checks apply, whether or not that person is remunerated for their role. However, SMFs don’t apply to not‑for profit debt advice firms under our rules. Regulatory References Feedback received Q14: Do you agree with our proposed requirement of regulatory references? If not, please explain why.
4.14 Most respondents agreed with our proposals for regulatory references, but asked for
clarification on some practical issues. These included:

how firms should approach reportable matters where the relevant individual has left
the firm
how firms should approach circumstances where an individual’s current or previous
employer won’t provide a regulatory reference

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

whether regulatory references would need to be requested before an individual has
handed in their notice
4.15 There were also several requests for guidance on what should be included in regulatory
references. Some firms suggested that additional specific information should be included in the regulatory reference template.
4.16 Respondents pointed out that employment legislation can make some firms reluctant
to disclose relevant information on candidates. A few firms asked us to explain how regulatory references interact with legal requirements. These include employment law, GDPR, laws such as the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act, managing conflicts of interest and any pre‑existing contracts, such as confidentiality requirements.
4.17 A few respondents noted that providing and getting regulatory references would lead
to increased costs and workloads for firms.
4.18 Some wanted us to create a portal or public register of references, through which
firms lodge confidential references and update them as necessary. One respondent recommended that we set up a tribunal process to address cases of unfairness around regulatory references. This could correct simple cases of unfairness or refer more complex disputes to the courts.
4.19 Many firms expressed concern that Certified Staff may omit previous employers from
their records, rather than receive a poor regulatory reference.
4.20 We were asked for guidance on how the regulatory reference requirements apply to
sole traders.
4.21 One person asked if firms are required to respond to references from third parties,
or respond to speculative regulatory references (such as from recruitment agencies) before an individual had been put forward for a role. Our response We are implementing our rules on regulatory references as consulted on. Feedback has shown that there were some misunderstandings about the changes we have proposed to our regulatory reference rules. Firms are already required to provide all information relevant to the fit and proper assessment when they get a request for a regulatory reference. The main changes proposed by CP17/25 were that firms must:
request a reference from all previous employers in the past six years
for Senior Managers, Certification Functions and non‑approved Non‑Executive Directors (except in Limited Scope firms)
provide references using a standard template
update references if new information comes to light

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms In addition, firms are already required not to enter into non‑disclosure agreements that could affect their ability to disclose the information required by regulatory references. New information after an employee has left the firm If new information about someone’s conduct comes to light after they have left a firm, the rules require the firm to update their new employer. However, to ensure fairness, these rules are limited. The standards that apply to an updated reference are the same as apply to the original reference based on what firms reasonably consider to be relevant. The test is whether the new information arising would have caused the providing firm to have written the original reference differently had the information been known at the time, and the new information would change an assessment of the fitness and propriety of the individual. Secondly, firms only need to update their new employer if that firm is regulated under FSMA, and the individual still works there. In practice this will need to be checked with the firms that were last sent references. The updating requirement applies:

to any notice period served between providing a reference and the
individual leaving a firm
for ex‑employers, six years from the date the individual left the firm
Also, misconduct that occurred more than six years ago, but which came to light within six years from the date the individual left the firm, may require disclosure if that misconduct is serious. This avoids data protection concerns about sharing personal information with firms that may not have a legitimate reason for receiving such information. We think this requirement is a valuable tool to encourage good conduct. In practice, such updated disclosures are likely to be infrequent. Nonetheless, on the occasions that they are necessary, they are likely to provide important information to the current employer. Timing of references We recognise that there may be situations where a candidate has not told their current employer that they are leaving. However, a fit and proper assessment can’t be made until the new firm can confirm that its due diligence is complete. This includes getting a reference from the candidate's previous employer. For Senior Managers, firms should ideally get references before they submit an application for approval. However, we know that there will be circumstances where this may not be possible. In these cases, firms can get references no later than one month before the end of the application process. For Certified Staff, the firm must receive the references before they issue the certificate. Cooperation between firms Any FCA‑authorised firm is already required to respond appropriately to reference requests. Our Handbook guidance states that we expect regulated firms to do so within 6 weeks. While references

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms from non‑financial services firms are likely to be general employment references, they can still provide important information to the hiring firm. In cases where it is difficult to get references, such as when the firm providing the reference is overseas, firms requesting the references should take all reasonable steps to obtain it. Role changes There may be cases where someone changes roles within a group, for example if they are initially hired into a Certification Function and then move into an SMF in another entity. In these cases, a firm doesn’t need to request a regulatory reference from the original entity if the group maintains centralised records or alternative means of sharing existing relevant information on the fit and proper assessment of candidates. SYSC 22.7.8G contains guidance on whether firms need to ask third‑party (non‑group) employers to reissue a reference where a relevant individual moves between group entities. Interaction with employment and data protection law Our regulatory reference rules only require firms to disclose information that has been properly verified. The template for regulatory references sets out the minimum criteria that a firm must disclose. A firm can still provide additional information. If a firm chooses to disclose more than we require, it should still meet its duties under general law to its former employee and to the firm requesting the reference. We believe that the requirement to provide a regulatory reference does not contravene any aspect of the GDPR, as:

the information employers are required to give is proportionate
storage of the information is for an appropriate amount of time
it is appropriate to store it and provide to a new employer to comply
with regulation
Contractual terms
Firms should already be collecting most of the information they have to include in regulatory references, as part of their statutory obligations to keep records for regulatory reporting. So we think that updating these existing processes should involve only minimal costs. One of the main aims of the SM&CR is for firms and Senior Managers to take greater responsibility for ensuring their employees are suitable. Regulatory references are designed to make it easier to share information between firms. The Fair and Effective Markets Review (FEMR) found that there was little benefit in creating an FCA portal of references. So we don’t believe it’s appropriate for us to create a central portal of references or to manage disputes about their content. Clarifications We believe that using a mandatory standard template will increase the consistency of references across different firms. Our Handbook contains

PS18/14
Chapter 4
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms guidance on how firms should complete references. It includes examples of factors to take into account when deciding whether old misconduct is sufficiently serious to be disclosed. When and how a firm decides to undertake disciplinary action is a matter for individual firms. We have not imposed a wider duty on firms to investigate all potential breaches or disclose information that they have not been able to verify. Under SYSC 22, firms must disclose, in the reference, all information that could be relevant to the hiring firm's assessment of the candidate’s fitness and propriety. If a firm fails to disclose all information that could be relevant, then this is likely to be a breach of our rules. In such cases we will consider what regulatory action should be taken. In certain circumstances, this may include possible enforcement action. If the former employer is not willing to provide a regulatory reference and is an authorised firm, you should:

explain you are requesting the reference under Chapter 22 of the
FCA Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls Manual (SYSC)
inform your FCA case officer (if you have one), call our helpline on
0300 500 0597 or email us at firm.queries@fca.org.uk For sole traders, we have added guidance to clarify that a firm doesn’t need to request a reference for a candidate if they were a sole trader. We have also added a rule clarifying that that sole traders won’t need to get references about themselves from previous employers if they will perform a Senior Management Function as the sole trader. A firm is only required to respond to a request for a regulatory reference received from another FCA‑regulated firm. Firms don’t need to respond to speculative references submitted before an individual has been proposed for a function. For example, a recruitment agency vetting a candidate before a firm has considered appointing that person.

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 5 Conduct Rules Who should read this chapter? All firms should read this chapter. Our proposals
5.1 In CP17/25, we proposed replacing the current Statements of Principle and Code
of Practice for Approved Persons (the APER section of the Handbook) with a set of individual Conduct Rules for all firms. This will ensure a single standard applies across the market. As the Conduct Rules apply directly to individuals, they will help shape firms’ culture, standards and policies. They should also promote positive behaviours that actively support our statutory objectives.
5.2 The Conduct Rules are made up of a general set of rules that we proposed to apply to
most employees in a firm. We also proposed a second tier of rules that only apply to Senior Managers.
Table 4: Conduct Rules
First Tier – Individual Conduct Rules

You must act with integrity
You must act with due care, skill and diligence
You must be open and cooperative with the FCA, the PRA and other regulators
You must pay due regard to the interests of customers and treat them fairly
You must observe proper standards of market conduct
Second Tier – Senior Manager Conduct Rules SC1. You must take reasonable steps to ensure that the business of the firm for which you are responsible is controlled effectively SC2. You must take reasonable steps to ensure that the business of the firm for which you are responsible complies with the relevant requirements and standards of the regulatory system SC3. You must take reasonable steps to ensure that any delegation of your responsibilities is to an appropriate person and that you oversee the discharge of the delegated responsibility effectively SC4. You must disclose appropriately any information of which the FCA or PRA would reasonably expect notice6 6 As well as Senior Managers, SC4 also applies to non‑approved Non‑Executive Directors.

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
5.3 We proposed that these Conduct Rules would apply to a firm’s regulated and
unregulated financial services activities. This includes any related ancillary activities – activities carried on in connection with a regulated activity.
5.4 We proposed to apply the Conduct Rules to:

all Senior Managers
all Certified individuals
all Directors who are not Senior Managers
all other employees, except ancillary staff (ie people who don’t perform a role
specific to financial services)
5.5 We proposed certain training and notification requirements. These included:
for Senior Managers, the requirement for firms to notify us of breaches within seven
business days of the firm concluding disciplinary action. Disciplinary action in this context means:
– issuing a formal written warning
– suspending or dismissing the individual – reducing or recovering any of the person’s remuneration
for all other staff that come under the Conduct Rules, the firm should make a report
every year using REP008 on our electronic reporting system, GABRIEL
5.6 This chapter sets out the feedback we received on the Conduct Rules and
our response.
Scope of the Conduct Rules
Feedback received
Q15: Do you agree with our proposal to apply the Conduct Rules to financial services activities? Q16: Do you agree with our proposal to apply the Conduct Rules to all employees who perform financial services, with the limited exclusions listed in section 7.14 [of CP17/25]? Q17: If you disagree, please explain why, including (where appropriate) cost implications.
5.7 A number of respondents asked us to clarify the scope of activities subject to the
Conduct Rules and on how this relates to the fitness and propriety requirements.

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
5.8 They also suggested additional roles for the ancillary staff list or that the list should not
be exhaustive. Others argued that certain roles on the ancillary staff list shouldn’t be excluded, or that all staff should be in scope.
5.9 A number of respondents asked us to clarify the scope of the Conduct Rules where
individuals who are not on the ancillary staff list in practice don’t undertake any financial services activities. We were also asked whether the Conduct Rules apply to trustees.
5.10 A number of respondents suggested that the scope of application of the Conduct
Rules should be the same as the banking regime.7 Some also asked us whether anything prevented a firm from applying the Conduct Rules to all of their employees. Others asked if the scope of the Conduct Rules would be different for Limited Scope firms. Requests for clarification
5.11 Respondents asked us to clarify:
7 Under the banking regime, the Conduct Rules apply to everyone someone does on behalf of a banking firm, whether it’s regulated or unregulated or linked to financial services.

how the Conduct Rules apply where firms carry out a mixture of financial services
and non‑financial services activities
what the narrower application of the Conduct Rules means compared to that in
place for banking firms
Our response
We are making the rules as consulted on.
Activities the Conduct Rules apply to
The scope of activities covered by the Conduct Rules, for firms other than banking firms, is set out in COCON 1.1.7A. Generally, this covers:
a firm’s regulated activities
an activity carried on in connection with a regulated activity, or held
out as being for the purposes of a regulated activity, or an activity listed in points 2 to 15 of Annex 1 to the CRD (List of activities subject to mutual recognition
any activities (regulated or unregulated):
– that could affect the integrity of the UK financial system – affect the ability of a firm to meet the fit and proper threshold conditions, or – affect the ability of a firm to meet requirements relating to the firm’s financial resources

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms This is the same for all firms, whether they are Limited Scope, Core or Enhanced. Who the Conduct Rules apply to If someone is working for an SM&CR firm as an employee, the Conduct Rules apply to them – even if they don’t have a contract of employment. FSMA provides a specific definition of ‘employee’ for the purpose of the SM&CR, which differs from the usual meaning in law and defines an employee as including ‘… a person who – (a) personally provides, or is under an obligation personally to provide, services to [a firm] under an arrangement made between [a firm] and the person providing the services or another person, and (b) is subject to (or to the right of) supervision, direction or control by [a firm] as to the manner in which those services are provided.’ The Conduct Rules also apply to SMFs and Board Directors, whether or not they come within this definition of ‘employee’. The Conduct Rules don’t apply to people who only perform an ‘ancillary role’. We have provided a list of ancillary roles the Conduct Rules don’t apply to. This is set out in COCON 1.1.2 R (6). These are roles which would be the same whether or not they are performed at a financial services firm or a non‑financial services firm. This means that individuals performing a role on the ancillary roles list and also undertaking other activities would be in scope of the Conduct Rules for any part of their role that falls into COCON 1.1.7A (ie the financial services part of their role), but not a part of their activities that falls outside COCON 1.1.7A. Equally, individuals at firms who are in no way involved in financial services activities would not fall within scope of the Conduct Rules. Ultimately, it is for firms to decide where individuals performing ancillary roles need to be trained on the Conduct Rules. Trustees The Conduct Rules only apply to SMFs, non‑SMF directors and employees of firms. FSMA defines ‘employees’ as including contractors, temps and secondees. On this basis, whether a trustee is in scope will depend on whether they meet the definition of an ‘employee’. Wider application of Conduct Rules Firms can apply the Conduct Rules to all of their staff if they want to. However, the training obligations, the requirement to report breaches and the FCA’s enforcement powers in relation to the Conduct Rules only apply to individuals in the scope of our Handbook rules. Similarly, a solo‑regulated firm in a banking group can choose to apply the banking scope of the Conduct Rules to all firms within the group, but the specific regulatory requirements again only apply to those individuals in scope of the Handbook rules.

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms In short, firms can choose to have a single standard for all employees if they want to, but our rules (including the mandatory training and reporting obligations) only apply to the population of staff described above. Firms may wish to consider whether there are any impacts on contracts of employment where they intend to apply the Conduct Rules to staff who are not within scope of our rules. Clarifications Some firms offer a mix of financial and non‑financial activities. For them, whether something is in scope of the Conduct Rules depends on whether it meets the definition of activities covered by the Conduct Rules. Generally, this will only be the case where there is a connection between the financial activity and non‑financial activity. This approach is narrower than the one we took for banking firms, as everything that a bank does will be captured by the Conduct Rules. For solo‑regulated firms and insurers, activity will only be captured if it meets the definition set out in COCON 1.1.7A. Conduct Rule Breach Reporting Feedback received Q18: Do you agree with our proposal to link notification requirements for disciplinary action to breaches of the Conduct Rules?
5.12 The majority of respondents supported our proposed Conduct Rule
reporting requirements.
5.13 A small number suggested that the reporting requirement should only apply to Senior
Managers and Certification Staff.
5.14 We were asked to explain how the FCA would use personal information and whether we
required this information for non‑certified staff.
5.15 Several respondents suggested that notification should be delayed until investigations
have been completed or a breach had been proved. Others felt firms should also notify breaches of other conduct standards, such as those of a professional body.
5.16 Some respondents suggested a right of appeal to the FCA, to prevent malicious
reporting. They also suggested a central register to support this process.
5.17 We were asked to consider increasing the notification period to one month for Senior
Managers to allow for appeal processes. Respondents also wanted us to confirm what firms should do when an employee leaves before disciplinary procedures are completed.

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Our response
Section 64C of FSMA requires firms to notify the FCA of disciplinary
action taken against relevant individuals because of breaches of the Conduct Rules. Under FSMA, disciplinary action covers:

issuing a formal written warning
suspension or dismissal of an individual
reduction or recovery of any of the person’s remuneration
Firms should only report Conduct Rule breaches to us where they result in one of these courses of action, and once the relevant disciplinary process has been completed. This means that if an individual leaves the firm during the disciplinary process and the process can’t be completed, the firm should not submit a report. We consider that the requirement that only completed disciplinary proceedings should be reported should be enough to prevent malicious reporting. It will also mean only proven Conduct Rule breaches will be reported to us. The Conduct Rule notification requirements do not change or remove firms’ obligations to report concerns about an individual’s conduct under existing rules or principles. Breaches of professional body codes should not be included unless they are also a breach of FCA Conduct Rules and the firm has disciplined the employee in the way described above. The Conduct Rules apply to all non‑ancillary staff, so the Conduct Rules reporting requirements apply to these staff too. This is because staff at all levels of a firm have the potential to cause harm. We have considered whether we should lengthen the notification period for Senior Managers to 1 month but have decided not to do so. The potentially serious nature of breaches by Senior Managers means that swift notification will often be an important factor in ensuring we can supervise effectively. Read our response to Question 19 for what a firm should do if the employee appeals against disciplinary action. Q19: Do you agree with our proposed frequency of Conduct Rules notifications? If not, please explain why.
5.18 Respondents wanted to know how we would ensure consistent reporting across
the industry.
5.19 Some also wanted further clarity about the notification requirements for Senior
Manager Conduct Rule breaches. They were concerned that firms would be

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms required to report breaches by Senior Managers without completing the firm’s disciplinary procedures.
5.20 Some suggested that annual reporting is too infrequent if a customer‑facing employee
is dismissed for a serious breach of Conduct Rules.
5.21 A few respondents suggested that notification reporting should align with existing
reporting schedules.
Requests for clarification
5.22 Respondents asked us to clarify:

how we will use Conduct Rule breach reports and what effect this will have on
relevant staff
how firms should update annual Conduct Rule breach notifications where they
become aware of new information that changes a disciplinary outcome Our response For Senior Managers, the notification requirements apply more widely than just the Conduct Rules. They also cover other factors including fitness and propriety. For notifications made due to breaches of the Conduct Rules, the 7-day period begins once disciplinary action has been concluded. Read 5.5 above for more information on what disciplinary action means in this context. This does not change or remove firms’ obligations to report concerns about an individual’s conduct under existing rules or principles, such as Principle 11. We consider that it would be disproportionate to require firms to report Conduct Rule breaches for non‑Senior Managers more often than annually (beyond existing obligations on firms to report concerns about an individual’s conduct, for example under Principle 11). The onus is on firms to ensure that breaches of the Conduct Rules are dealt with effectively under the firm’s own disciplinary process. Firms must also ensure that they appropriately address any customer harm. We have considered whether aligning the GABRIEL annual reporting requirement to a firm’s existing regulatory reporting schedule would be appropriate, and understand why this would help some firms. However, the requirement is designed to align with the banking regime and provide a consistent reporting date for the industry. Feedback suggests that for firms with mixed groups, such as banking groups that include asset managers, making a change would create a complex and inconsistent set of requirements. Different entities would have to report the same information for different periods. For this reason, and so that we can compare data across the whole industry, we intend to keep the proposed reporting period of 1 September to 31 August each year for most firms (with a submission

PS18/14
Chapter 5
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms due date of within 2 months of the end of the reporting period). However, for Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms – the majority of whom are the very smallest firms we regulate – we have decided to align the reporting period for this return with their annual reporting cycle. We considered extending this change to other small firms, but decided that it is only appropriate for these firms. The Conduct Rules are designed to raise standards of behaviour at all levels and ensure that individuals are responsible for their actions. The onus is on firms to take appropriate disciplinary action where an individual breaches a Conduct Rule. The information we get from these notifications will help inform supervisory activity. If disciplinary action is taken against an individual and they subsequently leave the firm during the reporting period, then the breach should still be reported. Firms should only report Conduct Rule breaches once disciplinary action has concluded. If a firm takes disciplinary action for a Conduct Rule breach but the employee appeals, or plans to, this should still be reported to us. In some circumstances, individuals will appeal the outcome of a concluded disciplinary process and the decision will be overturned. Where an appeal is successful, firms should update us in the following REP008 submission. We believe that these instances will be rare given the annual submission cycle. This should only usually occur where a disciplinary process is concluded shortly before the due date for REP008 and there is not time to assess the appeal before submission. In the case of a Senior Manager, a firm should report the result of a successful appeal as soon as reasonably practicable after the appeal.

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 6 Enhanced Tier – Criteria and Extra Requirements Who should read this chapter This chapter is only relevant to Enhanced firms, or firms intending to opt‑up to the Enhanced tier of the regime.
6.1 Feedback on Enhanced SMFs and Enhanced Prescribed Responsibilities can be found
in Chapter 2. This chapter provides our response to feedback on our proposed criteria for identifying Enhanced firms and the rules about firms moving between tiers of the regime. Our proposals
6.2 In July, we proposed 6 criteria to identify those firms that we will apply extra
requirements to. We classify these firms as Enhanced. The final criteria are set out in our legal instrument but we have summarised the changes in Table 5 below.
6.3 We also proposed rules for how firms will move between tiers of the regime when they
begin to meet, or no longer meet, the Enhanced criteria. We also proposed:

an Overall Responsibility requirement
a requirement that Enhanced firms create a Responsibilities Map
requirements around Handover Procedures
6.4 This chapter sets out the feedback we received and our response. Feedback on the
extra SMFs we proposed can be found in Chapter 2.
Enhanced criteria
Feedback received
Q20: Do you agree with our proposed approach of using the objective criteria set out above to identify firms for the Enhanced regime? If not, please explain why and propose alternative approaches.
6.5 Several respondents suggested that the criteria were too focused on quantitative
thresholds and that we should use qualitative thresholds instead, or as well. Some asset management respondents felt that asset managers should never be in the Enhanced tier as they are not systemically risky firms.

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
6.6 We received a significant amount of feedback suggesting that the proposed financial
criteria were too sensitive to single year anomalies. This may bring firms into the scope of the Enhanced tier, disproportionately. Respondents also suggested that the financial thresholds had been set too low.
6.7 Respondents suggested various combinations of financial and contextual information,
including using staff numbers, to decide if a firm qualifies as Enhanced.
6.8 Two respondents suggested removing the CASS Large criteria. They believed that
all CASS Large firms would meet the threshold for inclusion under the IFPRU criteria. One respondent highlighted that the CASS limit of £425m for Significant IFPRU firms is significantly less than the £1bn client money limit for CASS Large firms.
6.9 Respondents also asked us to clarify:

if a firm that does not submit the RMA‑B regulatory return is still subject to the
intermediation threshold
if a firm with waivers for Significant IFPRU obligations will still be subject to the
Enhanced tier
the application of the Enhanced tier to exempt commodities firms
Our response
We considered whether the Enhanced criteria set out in CP17/25 were too sensitive to single year anomalies that may not reflect the real impact of a firm’s business. We agree with the feedback and have decided to make some changes to the financial criteria. We set these out in Table 5 below.
Table 5: Enhanced criteria and changes following feedback
Form Name Purpose/Changes
A firm that is a Significant
IFPRU firm
None
A firm that is a CASS Large firm None
Firms with Assets Under
Management of £50bn or more (at any time in the previous 3 years) Firms with Assets Under Management of £50bn or more calculated as a three year rolling average Firms with current total intermediary regulated business revenue of £35m or more per annum Firms with current total intermediary regulated business revenue of £35m or more per annum calculated as a three year rolling average

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Form Name Purpose/Changes Firms with an annual regulated revenue generated by consumer credit lending of £100m or more Firms with annual revenue generated by regulated consumer credit lending of £100m or more calculated as a three year rolling average8 Please read the details in our response below for firms that don’t yet have data covering three complete years Mortgage lenders (that are not banks) with 10,000 or more regulated mortgages outstanding Mortgage lenders and administrators (that are not banks) with 10,000 or more regulated mortgages outstanding8 The three financial criteria will now all be worked out on a 3-year rolling average basis, with slight variations necessary due to the underlying reporting requirements. This means that:

the Assets under Management (AuM) threshold will now be calculated
on a 3 year rolling average, updated at every FSA038 submission. This means that, for example, if a firm submits FSA038 on a bi‑annual/ six‑monthly basis, it would calculate its average AUM after each submission, using the most recent return and the five preceding returns (covering the last three years)
the intermediation threshold drawn from section B of the RMAR
will also be calculated on a 3 year rolling average basis. There is more information on the Retail Mediation Activities Return in SUP 16 of our Handbook. However, this threshold will only use year‑end submissions as the underlying regulatory return is cumulative
the consumer credit lending revenue threshold will be calculated
on a 3-year rolling basis, and will be the 3-year average drawn from firms’ full year returns. We know that some firms won’t yet have data covering 3 complete years. These firms should calculate the average using data covering 2 complete years, where this is the case, or 1. Where a firm does not have data covering 1 complete year it won’t be considered Enhanced, unless it decides to ‘opt‑up’ We have decided not to make any changes to the absolute level of the thresholds. We believe that the proposed levels are appropriate indicators of impact. They are tailored to individual sectors and are clearly defined. We also prefer quantitative thresholds as they provide firms with stable, objective and transparent criteria. We have not used employee numbers to decide whether a firm falls in the Core or Enhanced tier, as we don’t want to create a disincentive for firms to hire staff. In addition, we don’t think that the number of employees a firm has will necessarily correlate to their potential impact on our objectives. The Enhanced tier isn’t just designed to capture systemically risky firms from a prudential perspective. It’s also designed to capture firms that are 8 We have also slightly amended the labelling of two of the criteria to ensure clarity. These changes ensure that the labelling in this Policy Statement aligns with the rules we consulted on and the near-final rules in our instrument. The two changes are to clarify that the mortgage criterion applies to mortgage lenders and administrators, and to clarify that the consumer credit lending threshold applies to regulated consumer credit lending.

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms larger in size or have more complex structures. It is in these firms that weaknesses in accountability or governance could cause greater harm to consumers, or impact on market integrity. The asset management industry plays a vital role in the UK’s economy and manages the savings and pensions of millions people. As such, we don’t agree that they should be excluded from the Enhanced tier. As it’s possible to be a CASS Large firm without also being a Significant IFPRU firm, we have maintained the CASS Large criteria as proposed. While the CASS limit for Significant IFPRU firms is lower than that for CASS Large firms, we believe that this is appropriate as these two thresholds target different possible harms. There are a few firms who complete returns other than RMA‑B and who have intermediation revenue of over £35m. Our intention was that these firms would be captured by the threshold. We agree that the rules as proposed did not have this effect. We plan to consult separately on bringing these firms into the Enhanced tier before the start of the SM&CR. If a firm has a waiver from being a Significant IFPRU firm entirely, it won’t meet the IFPRU criterion to make it an Enhanced firm. If a firm has a waiver from parts of the Significant IFPRU requirements only, they will still be an Enhanced firm. Exempt IFPRU commodities firms that are Significant IFPRU firms will be Enhanced firms. Moving to and from the Enhanced tier Feedback received Q21: Do you agree with our proposed approach to moving firms between Core and Enhanced? If not, please explain why.
6.10 Respondents broadly supported our proposed approach to firms moving in and out of
the Enhanced tier.
6.11 Several respondents asked how the proposed approach would apply to groups. They
felt that having the ability to opt‑up to the Enhanced tier would ensure a consistent approach for groups with entities in different tiers.
6.12 One respondent suggested that Core or Limited Scope entities in a group containing
an Enhanced firm should also be subject to the Enhanced tier. Others asked us whether firms in this situation would be able to opt‑up into the Enhanced tier.
6.13 Some respondents wanted to extend the transition period for firms moving into the
Enhanced tier to 12 months, rather than 6 months. This would align it with the exit transition period.
6.14 Respondents asked us to clarify:

the approach where firms move categories during the transition period

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

whether firms could apply for waivers
if we could ask firms to comply with the Enhanced tier even if they don’t meet
the criteria
Our response
Opting Up
We don’t believe that it would be proportionate to make all firms in a group with an Enhanced firm automatically apply the Enhanced tier. However, we agree that it should be easier for firms to opt into the Enhanced tier if they want to, particularly within groups. As a result, we have made it easier for firms to opt‑up using a notification process and a new form (Form O). Firms can make the decision to opt‑up after considering their specific circumstances. Once firms have opted into the Enhanced tier they must comply with all of the relevant rules. If they don’t it will be a breach of our rules – firms can’t choose to apply some elements of the regime and not others. This is to ensure consistency and transparency across all firms in the Enhanced tier. The SM&CR is designed to be proportionate. We don’t expect firms to opt into the Enhanced tier for the sake of having more SMFs and opting into the Enhanced tier must not lead to accountability at these firms becoming unclear. If firms choose to opt into the Enhanced tier (or from Limited Scope to the Core), they must be ready to comply with all the rules of the opted‑into regime 3 months after the date Form O is submitted. More information on opting up is in SYSC 23 Annex 1. Moving between tiers We agree that a longer transition period would be appropriate for firms moving into the Enhanced tier. We have therefore extended the transition period to 12 months, which means that firms moving into the Enhanced tier will have 12 months to prepare and make the relevant changes, where applicable. This aligns the entry transition period with the exit transition period. This is the amount of time that the Enhanced tier applies once a firm no longer meets the relevant criteria. As mentioned above, the period is 3 months if the firm opts up to the Enhanced tier. While we believe that the changes to the financial thresholds will make this less common, it is possible that a small number of firms will change regime tier during the transition to the new SM&CR. If a firm believes that it is likely to change tiers during the transition, they should contact us as soon as possible so that we can help them. The existing waivers processes will continue to apply. We will consider all requests using the existing criteria.

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Overall Responsibility Requirement Feedback received Q25: Do you agree with our proposal to apply the Overall Responsibility requirement to Enhanced firms? If not, please explain why.
6.15 We received mainly positive feedback to our proposals. Some respondents were
unclear on the difference between the Overall Responsibility requirement and the SMF18 – Overall Responsibility Function.
6.16 A few respondents suggested that the Overall Responsibility requirement should apply
to Core firms and that we should make the SMF18 – Overall Responsibility Function available to these firms.
6.17 One respondent noted that, as part of the re‑structuring of SYSC, we have
deleted SYSC 4.7.9G. This provided guidance on the purpose of the Overall Responsibility requirement.
6.18 Many respondents asked for guidance on how to apply the rule, as well as for examples
of good practice. Some respondents asked which areas of their ‘unregulated’ business had to be represented by a Senior Manager. Others wanted guidance on how to treat business unit heads and how to distinguish between an individual holding the Significant Management Certification Function and one holding the SMF18.
6.19 We were asked how this requirement should be applied within group structures,
particularly where the parent company has significant management influence in the subsidiary. Respondents also wanted to know whether the changes will alter how Overall Responsibility applies to banking firms.
6.20 One respondent asked us to consider redrafting SYSC 4.7.30G. This refers to the
inclusion of activities, transactions, business areas and management functions that are located or take place outside the UK. They asked us whether this could be limited to firms only operating, or dealing with customers, in the UK. Our response The Other Overall Responsibility Function and the Overall Responsibility requirement are separate but related concepts:

the Overall Responsibility requirement asks firms to ensure that
every activity, business area and management function has a Senior Manager with ‘Overall Responsibility’ for it
the SMF18 – Other Overall Responsibility Function is an additional
SMF. Firms can use this where an individual has ‘Overall Responsibility’ for an activity, business area, or management function, but does not already hold an SMF CP 17/25 set out some of the steps a firm may wish to take to comply with the Overall Responsibility rules. We have not set out best practice guidance as the way that firms allocate Overall Responsibility will be

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms different for every firm. The Responsibilities Map should help Enhanced firms to work out if there are any gaps in Overall Responsibility. SMF18 – Other Overall Responsibility Function We have addressed feedback about the difference between SMF18 and the Significant Management Function in our response to feedback on Enhanced SMFs. Feedback on SMF18 is addressed in the chapter on SMFs for Core firms. We have not applied an Overall Responsibility requirement to the Core tier because we think it is disproportionate to require this of all Core firms. This means we don’t require Core firms to ensure there is a Senior Manager responsible for every area of the firm’s business. Enhanced firms should also keep in mind that the regime applies to individual legal entities. Firms must ensure that they identify the individual who is genuinely accountable in the entity in question. This is regardless of whether or not they are a director or employee of that particular entity. For example, there may be situations where an individual outside the firm has Overall Responsibility for the relevant activity, business area or management function of the firm – for example, someone in another group entity. In most cases, this person should be approved as SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager. If not, they will need to be approved as SMF18, as long as they don’t hold any other SMF at the firm. In short, if an individual in another group entity in the scenario above does not hold an SMF at the firm, then:

if their role meets both the definition of SMF7 and SMF18, the
individual should be approved as SMF7
if their role does not meet the definition of SMF7, then they should be
approved as SMF18
Overall Responsibility Requirement
We proposed new guidance in SYSC 26.2 to explain the purpose of the Overall Responsibility requirement. This will replace the guidance in SYSC 4.7.9G. It sets out that at banking firms and Enhanced solo‑regulated SM&CR firms a Senior Manager should be responsible and accountable for each area of a firm’s activities. We confirm that this does not change how Overall Responsibility applies to banking firms. Unregulated activities will come into the scope of Overall Responsibility where they meet the definition of ‘SMCR financial activities’ under our Handbook. This includes:
regulated activities
an activity carried on in connection with a regulated activity (whether
current, past or contemplated)

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

an activity held out as being for the purposes of a regulated
activity or an activity included on the ‘List of activities subject to mutual recognition’ in Annex 1 of the CRD (whether current, past or contemplated) The definition of SMCR financial activities in the Glossary contains more detail. There is no territorial limitation restricting the rules relating to Overall Responsibility to transactions in the UK. Someone performing a function for a UK entity can affect that entity even where they are doing business outside the UK. Responsibilities Maps Feedback received Q26: Do you agree with our proposal to apply Responsibilities Maps to Enhanced firms? If not, please explain why.
6.21 Most respondents agreed with our proposals, with a significant number suggesting
that all firms should maintain a Responsibilities Map.
6.22 There was some confusion about the level of detail required in the Responsibilities
Map. Some respondents were unsure whether information in Statements of Responsibilities should be repeated. A number of firms asked for guidance on how to create the map and what lessons were learned when banking firms implemented this.
6.23 There were questions about when maps need to be updated and submitted to us,
following changes to the management team.
Some respondents suggested that legal entities managed as a group could submit a single Responsibilities Map. Some respondents also asked for guidance on how to represent key senior managers in the parent group. Our response Under Principle 3, all firms need to take reasonable care to organise and control their affairs responsibly and effectively. All firms may find it helpful to use the principles and practice of the Responsibilities Map, but we only require Enhanced firms to create and maintain them, and to send these to us when there is a material change. We feel it would be disproportionate to require smaller firms to do this. Respondents should refer to our rule in SYSC 25.2.3, which describes what a Responsibilities Map must include. The level of detail in the map should clearly describe the firm’s management and governance arrangements. They can also give a collective view of how responsibilities have been allocated and highlight issues or gaps in a firm’s governance arrangements.

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Our rules state that Responsibilities Maps should be up‑to‑date at all times. It is up to firms to decide how they do this and we do not require changes to be notified to us except in specified circumstances (such as a notification of a change to a Senior Manager’s SoR or an application for approval of an SMF). For each significant change in the management arrangements at a firm,9 every impacted Senior Manager will need to update their SoR. Any significant changes to a Senior Manager’s responsibilities must be shown on an updated SoR and re‑submitted to us, along with an updated Responsibilities Map. In some cases, the changes could make little difference to the overall map. In other cases, reviewing the map could help the firm spot issues resulting from the changes, such as gaps or overlaps in responsibilities. We recognise respondents’ feedback on the resources required to update the maps and SoRs. However, we think that the requirements are proportionate. Firms with a simple allocation of responsibilities will only need to produce simple documents. Likewise, small changes to responsibilities will create small changes to the maps and may not require any change to SoRs. Firms which operate within a group should note that the SM&CR applies to legal entities individually, rather than to a group as a whole. It is therefore not appropriate for firms to submit only one Responsibilities Map for the entire group. However, the guidance in SYSC 25 recognises that a firm may share management or governance arrangements with other members of the group. Firms should include these details in their maps to show how their management and governance arrangements fit together with the group. Handover Procedures Feedback received Q27: Do you agree with our proposal to apply handover procedures to Enhanced firms? If not, please explain why.
6.24 Most respondents welcomed our proposal to apply handover procedures to Enhanced
firms. In their view, firms had already developed some form of handover procedures.
6.25 While agreeing with our proposals, a few respondents suggested that we extend this to
cover Core firms as well.
6.26 Some expressed concerns – in particular, some felt that we should not prescribe or
dictate handover procedures. Others were concerned that there could be problems applying our proposals if Senior Managers leave the role suddenly without preparing handover materials. 9 This is required by FSMA and explained in SUP10C.11, where we provide examples of what is and isn't a significant change.

PS18/14
Chapter 6
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
6.27 We were asked about the detail that should be recorded in the handover template, and
asked to explain our expectations and provide good practice guidance on the following:

reasonable steps
what should be included in the handover policies and certificates
Our response
Having considered respondents’ feedback, we will implement our proposals unchanged. We think there has been a misunderstanding of the policy intention, especially around handover arrangements and handover certificates. We want to clarify that it isn’t mandatory to prepare a handover certificate. This is one way that firms can meet the handover requirements, but we understand that there may be cases where this is impractical. We think this is clear in our Handbook in SYSC 25.9.8. Firms should have arrangements for an orderly transition between Senior Managers. Firms can decide how to do this. Each firm’s handover material will depend on the business model and governance structure, as well as the specific individual’s position and responsibilities. Handover policies can help firms demonstrate they have taken reasonable steps to ensure a person taking a Senior Manager role has all the information and materials they could reasonably expect to do their job effectively, even where the previous Senior Manager departs suddenly. We won’t require Core firms to comply with the handover rules. However, Senior Managers in Core and Limited Scope firms will still be subject to SC1 of the Conduct Rules. This requires Senior Managers to ensure that the business of the firm for which they are responsible is controlled effectively. Core firms may find handover procedures useful to support this, but it is not required.

PS18/14
Chapter 7
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 7 Applying the new regime to incoming UK branches Who should read this chapter This chapter only applies to EEA and Third Country Branches. Our proposals
7.1 In CP17/25, we proposed a set of Senior Management Functions for EEA and non‑EEA
branches, and set out how we proposed to apply the Certification Regime and Conduct Rules to these firms.
7.2 We also proposed a set of Prescribed Responsibilities for non‑EEA branches, 3 of which
(aa, ff and ee) are specific to non‑EEA branches.
Table 6: Application of the SM&CR to branches
Element EEA Branches Non‑EEA Branches
SMFs SMF21 –
EEA Branch
Senior Manager
SMF19 – Head of Third Country Branch
SMF17 – Money
Laundering
Reporting
Officer (MLRO)
SMF3 – Executive Director
SMF16 – Compliance Oversight
SMF17 – Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) Prescribed Responsibilities N/A a) Performance by the firm of its obligations under the Senior Managers Regime, including implementation and oversight b) Performance by the firm of its obligations under the Certification Regime b-1) Performance by the firm of its obligations in respect of notifications and training of the Conduct Rules d) Responsibility for the firm’s policies and procedures for countering the risk that the firm might be used to further financial crime z) Responsibility for the firm’s compliance with CASS aa) Responsibility for management of the firm’s risk management processes in the UK ff) Responsibility for the firm’s compliance with the UK regulatory system applicable to the firm

PS18/14
Chapter 7
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Element EEA Branches Non‑EEA Branches ee) Responsibility for the escalation of correspondence from the PRA, FCA and other regulators in respect of the firm to the governing body and/or the management body of the firm or, where appropriate, of the parent undertaking or holding company of the firm’s group (za) Responsibility for an AFM’s value for money assessments, independent director representation and acting in investors’ best interests Certification Regime Yes Conduct Rules Yes Feedback received Q28: Do you agree with our proposals for Senior Managers in EEA branches? Q29: Do you agree with our proposals on the Certification Regime and Conduct Rules for EEA branches? Q30: Do you agree with our proposals for Senior Managers in non‑EEA branches? If you disagree, please explain why. Q31: Do you agree with our proposals for Prescribed Responsibilities in non‑EEA branches? If you disagree, please explain why. Q32: Do you agree with our proposals on the Certification Regime and Conduct Rules for non‑EEA branches?
7.3 The majority of respondents supported our proposals for branches. They asked how
the regime would apply to EEA branches after the UK leaves the European Union.
7.4 Some challenged the additional administrative burden on Senior Managers in non‑UK
locations who are already subject to local regulations. Others noted that the Branch Manager may not be involved in the day to day activities of the firm, particularly in larger branches. One respondent suggested that the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight Function should apply to EEA branches to ensure head offices appreciate the regulatory requirements of the UK.
7.5 One respondent noted that the proposals for solo‑regulated non‑EEA branches were
inconsistent with the banking regime, as the SMF7 – Group Entity Function doesn’t apply to solo‑regulated branches.
7.6 Respondents asked us to confirm that PRs should not be assigned to individuals in EEA
branches but should be assigned to Senior Managers in non‑EEA branches.

PS18/14
Chapter 7
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
7.7 Some respondents wanted the PRs to be consistent across the different categories
of firms.
7.8 Others suggested that PRs for non‑EEA firms should also include responsibility for
culture, training and conflicts of interest.
7.9 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposals on the Certification Regime
and Conduct Rules for EEA branches. However, some questioned whether it was proportionate to have 2 Senior Managers responsible for a large certified population. Most welcomed the exclusion of non‑UK staff from the Certification Regime, but there was some concern that this could lead to gaps in accountability in firms with global operations. Our response We explained in our Mission that we would review our Handbook after the work on the outcome on EU withdrawal is clear. Until then, we don’t intend to do further work on changing the structure of our Handbook, including the SM&CR rules. Senior Managers at EEA Branches EEA branches have a simplified version of the Senior Managers Regime – the only individuals who require approval are the EEA Branch Senior Manager and the MLRO. We believe that this tailored version of the regime is proportionate and appropriate, and reflects the split of home and host regulator responsibilities. EEA branches don’t need to put forward their Head of Compliance or Compliance Officer for approval for the Compliance Oversight function (SMF16). This is a matter reserved to the home member state. This is consistent with the current APR for EEA branches, as well as the regime for banking firms. EEA Branches should still organise themselves so they meet their regulatory responsibilities, for example with clear governance structures and lines of accountability. Senior Managers in EEA branches will require a SoR. We confirm that PRs won’t apply to EEA branches. Non‑EEA Branches and SMF7 For non‑EEA branches, we have not included the SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager. This is consistent with our approach for UK‑based firms in the Core tier, and reflects a proportionate application of the regime to solo‑regulated firms. Territorial Scope Most respondents agreed with the proposed territorial application of the regime for branches, so we have maintained this approach in our near‑final rules. We believe this reflects the different regulatory requirements that apply to incoming branches. This includes rules on

PS18/14
Chapter 7
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms fitness and propriety, and conduct, which apply to staff under their home state regulations. Prescribed Responsibilities for Branches The differences in the PRs for Core and Enhanced firms and Non‑EEA branches reflect the different natures and risks associated with these businesses. We don’t propose applying any additional PRs to non‑EEA branches as we think the suite we proposed is appropriate and proportionate. It focuses accountability on the key conduct and prudential risks that can harm our objectives. See our feedback in
Chapter 2 for more detail on this.

PS18/14
Chapter 8
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 8 Changes that affect banking firms and solo‑regulated firms Our proposals
8.1 In CP17/25, we proposed introducing a new PR for the Conduct Rules. This means that
all firms, including banking firms, must allocate responsibility for ensuring that they train staff in the Conduct Rules and comply with the FCA notification requirements.
8.2 The 12-week rule allows someone to cover for a Senior Manager without being
approved, where the absence is temporary or reasonably unforeseen, and the appointment is for less than 12 consecutive weeks. We proposed to allow any responsibility that the absent manager holds under the Overall Responsibility requirement to be reallocated to someone who is not approved, during their absence. We also suggested a technical change to apply the SMF27 – Partner function to banks.
8.3 This chapter sets out the feedback we received on these topics and our response.
New PR for the Conduct Rules
Feedback received
Q33: Do you agree with our proposal to introduce a new Prescribed Responsibility for the Conduct Rules that will apply to banking firms?
8.4 The majority of respondents supported our proposal. A small number challenged the
need for the PR and requested clarity on how to allocate it.
8.5 A small number of respondents believed that it might be difficult to allocate this PR to
one person, as training is often administered by HR, Legal and Compliance. Our response The Conduct Rules and this PR aim to drive up standards of individual behaviour in financial services. We aim to improve individual accountability and awareness of conduct issues. This will in turn achieve the culture change that we are seeking. We want to make sure a senior individual is accountable for ensuring adequate training and accurate reporting of breach information to the regulator. As a result, having considered respondents’ feedback, we believe that introducing this PR will help achieve our aims.

PS18/14
Chapter 8
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Firms must decide which Senior Manager is the best person to hold this PR. It should be given to the Senior Manager who is the most senior person responsible for the Conduct Rules training and notification requirements. They must also have sufficient authority and an appropriate level of knowledge and competence to do this properly. In larger firms, this may be the individual accountable for ensuring that activities undertaken across different parts of the firm (eg HR, legal and compliance) enable the firm to comply with our requirements. It doesn’t mean this person needs to be personally involved in these activities day‑to‑day. This PR should normally be held by only one person. Firms will only be able to share this PR in limited circumstances. They must be able to show that this is appropriate and justifiable. If a firm decides it is appropriate to share this PR, they must show why this is justified and confirm that this does not leave a gap. Changes to the 12-week rule Feedback received Q34: Do you agree with our changes to the 12-week rule? If not, please explain why.
8.6 Several respondents suggested extending the 12 week period or using waivers where
a firm can’t recruit a replacement within 12 weeks.
8.7 We were asked to clarify how the rule applies to a variety of reasons for an
SMF’s absence.
Our response
We intend to implement the 12-week rule as proposed. This applies whatever the reason for the Senior Manager’s absence. We recognise that recruitment processes can take longer than 12 weeks. However, we don’t believe that it would be appropriate for an individual to perform a Senior Management Function for longer than this without approval. As such, if someone is covering an absence for longer than 12 weeks, they will need to be approved for the relevant SMF they are covering, or the firm would need to apply for a waiver.

PS18/14
Chapter 8
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Applying the Partner Function to Banks Q35: Do you agree with our approach to applying the partner function to banking firms? If not, please explain why.
8.8 We received 2 responses to this question. Both agreed with our approach.
Our response
We will apply the Partner Function to Banks as planned.

PS18/14
Chapter 9
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 9 Feedback to our Cost‑Benefit Analysis
9.1 When proposing rules, we must publish a cost benefit analysis (CBA) under
Section 138I(2)(a) of FSMA. The CBA must include an analysis and estimate of
the costs arising from, and the benefits brought about by, our proposed rules. We published a CBA for our proposals in July, alongside CP17/25.
9.2 This chapter sets out our response to the feedback we received on our CBA. We have
separately published an updated CBA alongside this Policy Statement.
9.3 In CP17/25 and CP17/40, we explained, as required by Section 138K of FSMA,
that we did not expect our proposals to have a significantly different impact on mutual societies. The responses received to our consultations have not changed this assessment. Feedback received Q36: Based on the summary above and the full analysis10, do5you agree with our approach and methodology for the cost-benefit analysis? If not, please explain why. Q37: Based on the summary above and the full analysis10, do you agree with our findings and conclusions for the cost‑benefit analysis? If not, please explain why.
9.4 We received 11 responses to these questions.
9.5 Six respondents agreed with the analysis and conclusions, but asked us to work closely
with firms during implementation because of the number of other ongoing regulatory initiatives happening at the same time. One suggested that a higher response rate to our survey would have given greater confidence about our conclusion.
9.6 One respondent suggested that some Core firms may choose to adopt elements
of the Enhanced tier as best practice and we should consider these costs as part of the CBA.
9.7 Another respondent agreed with the overall CBA, but said our analysis did not consider
the impact for groups with entities already under the SM&CR. They suggested that, for these firms, the costs may be greater than the benefits. A further respondent suggested that smaller firms pose a lower risk, so the cost‑benefit of applying the SM&CR to these firms is less clear, particularly as they are subject to the APR.
9.8 One respondent suggested that, because the merged CBA covers both solo‑regulated
firms and insurers, this made it difficult to work out which parts of the analysis apply to which firms. 10 www.fca.org.uk/publication/research/cba-extensionsenior-managers-certification-regime.pdf

PS18/14
Chapter 9
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
9.9 One respondent said that the SM&CR would result in less direct supervision of firms
and that we should take this into account. They also asked us to confirm whether our implementation costs will come from our existing budget.
9.10 One respondent disagreed with our CBA and argued that the changes we proposed
will involve significant one‑off and ongoing costs. They noted that the CBA did not incorporate the actual costs to banking firms and asked for further information on our discounting of the reported costs. One respondent suggested that the quoted costs to maintain the Certification Regime were an underestimate and that significant work would be needed to oversee and monitor the certified population. Some other respondents commented more generally that the costs were likely to be understated.
9.11 One industry association said we had given little explanation about why we had left out
some cost categories in the compliance costs estimates in the main part of the CBA. Another asked why we had not separated the costs associated with the new Conduct Rules PR for banking firms.
9.12 We were also asked to further explain what ‘average costs’ incurred by firms means.
9.13 Some respondents suggested that unintended consequences from the proposed
changes could cause considerable consumer harm, and we had overlooked the cost of this. Another respondent suggested that the consumer protection should override any CBA findings.
9.14 We were asked whether the following factors had been included in the CBA:

increased headcount as a result of the SM&CR
IT system builds to meet the additional documentation and evidencing requirements
legal fees
administration costs
higher executive compensation
training & development
9.15 Some respondents suggested that we should quantify both tangible and
intangible benefits.
Our response
We used a survey to help inform decisions about what the right package of policy proposals was, and to assess the costs and benefits of our final policy proposal. We consider our position robust because we surveyed a large number of firms (ca. 2020 of which 1690 were solo‑regulated) and do not consider that the number of 171 responses by solo‑regulated firms in the Core tier and 37 responses by insurers is too small to draw reliable conclusions. Where the number of responses for the given tier was small,

PS18/14
Chapter 9
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms we have used the estimated costs with caution. We have undertaken additional analysis where we do not believe we can rely on the estimates. We have consulted on the CBA and have not received evidence that suggests we reached a wrong conclusion. Some Core firms may choose to adopt elements of the Enhanced tier, but this is not required under the rules. As a result, we have not included any additional costs from voluntary compliance with the SM&CR. The analysis in the original CBA (and final CBA) considers the impact of the SM&CR on groups with entities which are already subject to SM&CR. Firms were asked for the incremental costs of the new regime over and above the existing Approved Persons Regime and some survey respondents are part of groups already subject to SM&CR. The compliance cost estimates and the analysis in the CBA are therefore based on the additional costs of the SM&CR. We have considered different types of firms by designing 3 categories of firms within the SM&CR (‘tiers’). The CBA concludes that the SM&CR is likely to be net beneficial overall. Subheadings and table headings in the CBA clarify which parts of the compliance cost analysis and illustrative measurements of the likely benefits refer to solo‑regulated firms and insurers. The existing academic literature does not allow us to discuss the non‑quantifiable costs or benefits separately for solo‑regulated firms or insurers. The CBA shows that the SM&CR is expected to lead to significant compliance costs for firms, but also to significant benefits. The per firm estimates presented in the CBA are based on weighted averages of the firms in our sample. We believe that respondents who felt that our analysis underestimates the compliance costs are likely to be larger firms or have more complex governance structures than most other firms in their tier. Those who responded to the survey are larger firms which have submitted high cost estimates. None of the respondents has provided any extra evidence that would allow us to assess these comments further. We discuss the main reasons for leaving out certain cost categories from the cost estimates included in pages 18 to 20 of the original CBA. The costs incurred by the FCA for the implementation of the SM&CR will be recovered separately from industry. The CBA does not use banking firms’ compliance costs because banks are different from solo‑regulated firms and insurers. Estimates based on their costs would therefore not be representative for firms in scope of the SM&CR. As the SM&CR differs from the Senior Managers Regime for banks, compliance costs for these two regimes will likely differ. Average costs The average compliance costs discussed in the original CBA and in the CBA accompanying this PS are the averages over all the cost estimates provided by the survey respondents for each given tier. These averages

PS18/14
Chapter 9
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms have been weighted to ensure they represent the different types of firms in the overall population. These averages are not typical costs – given the broad range of firms in scope of the SM&CR it is impossible to say which type of firm (for example, with a certain number of SMFs or employees) would typically incur such costs. Some firms will incur higher costs than the average and others will incur lower costs. We have used these averages to estimate the total compliance cost for all firms in each of the tiers. We believe that the CBA fairly reflects the non‑quantifiable costs. We note that respondents have not provided any detailed arguments or evidence otherwise. This includes concerns regarding consumer protection. We have considered the following factors in the CBA:

increased headcount: The cost categories in the survey included
required adjustments firms must make, including recruitment costs, staff time for discussions of responsibilities, staff monitoring and record keeping. These adjustments may require an increase in headcount. We discuss the benefits of these activities in the CBA
Chapter on benefits
costs to amend IT systems and to develop and run training and
development: These cost categories were included in the survey
legal fees and administrative costs: Where these do not fall into the
cost categories in the survey, respondents will have included those in the category ‘other costs’
higher executive compensation: see section ‘Wage compensation’
(p.31 of the original CBA)
The CBA measures the expected benefits as much as is possible. Further attempts to quantity these would have led to estimates that we believe would not have been sufficiently reliable. The original CBA discusses the costs and benefits of the SM&CR for solo‑regulated firms and insurers. The compliance cost for the three changes for banking firms are discussed in CP17/25 (at paragraph 41 of Annex 1). These were considered to be of minimal significance and did not require a CBA according to FSMA 138L(3)(b).

PS18/14 Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Part 2:
Feedback to CP17/40:
Transitioning FCA firms and individuals to the Senior Managers & Certification Regime

PS18/14
Chapter 10
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 10 Transitional Arrangements Who should read this chapter This chapter applies to all firms.. Our proposals
10.1 This chapter contains our response to feedback we received on the transitional
arrangements we consulted on in CP17/40, including:

the phased implementation of the Certification Regime
the phased implementation of the Conduct Rules
the requirement to check that the firm’s information is correct on the Financial
Services Register after automatic conversion
Figure 2. Summary of transitional arrangements
10.2 For the purposes of the near-final rules that form part of this Policy Statement, we
have assumed firms will have 12 months from the start of the regime to complete their fitness and propriety assessments and to get the certification paperwork in place. This is subject to commencement regulations to be made by HM Treasury.

PS18/14
Chapter 10
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Feedback received Q1: Do you have any comments on our proposed transitional arrangements?
10.3 Respondents asked us to communicate the start date for the new regime as soon as
possible. They requested an extended time period between the publication of the final rules and the start of the SM&CR. Some respondents suggested we should allow the conversion process to start before Commencement. This would allow firms to identify and correct errors or omissions which occur during the automatic conversion process.
10.4 Some respondents asked us to clarify what firms should do if, after Commencement of
the new regime, details in the Register about their Senior Managers are incorrect.
10.5 There were some practical suggestions to ease the transition process. These included
asking us to provide dedicated support during transition and improvements we might make to the forms.
10.6 One person asked us to clarify what fitness and propriety checks firms should do
during transition, and what firms should do about long‑standing employees who change roles after start of the regime.
10.7 We were also asked to explain how the new regime will affect Appointed
Representatives (ARs).
Our response
Commencement dates and support during the transition process The Treasury has announced that the extension of the SM&CR will commence on 9 December 2019 for solo‑regulated firms. We have provided a guide to the regime and website content to help firms move to the SM&CR. Our Contact Centre is also available to help firms with any specific questions, as well as through firms’ usual supervisory contacts. Contact details for the FCA are available on our website. Checking the Register after Commencement Firms must check that their approvals are correct on the Financial Services Register as soon as the new regime starts. If their approvals are incorrect then they should submit the relevant regulatory forms to correct this, as soon as possible. We encourage firms to ensure that their current approvals are up to date and also to check the Register before the new regime starts. This will minimise the number of errors that occur. Firms can submit Form K conversion notifications to us up until a week before Commencement. This is to give firms as much time as possible to finalise their documentation. This means that we will be unable to provide provisional results of conversion ahead of the start of the new regime.

PS18/14
Chapter 10
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms We will convert existing functions according to the mapping tables set out in Chapters 11 and 12. Firms can use these tables ahead of conversion to determine which of their controlled functions will be mapped to relevant SMFs. We have also published content on our website to help firms with this process. Fitness and Propriety (F&P) checks We provide guidance on the things firms should consider when assessing an individual’s fitness and propriety in the FIT sourcebook of our Handbook. This guidance is being retained under the SM&CR. Firms must decide for themselves the appropriate level of checks to conduct. Applications under APR will use the existing forms, but applications using the new SM&CR forms will include the amended F&P questions consulted on in CP17/40. Appointed Representatives As explained in CP17/40, legislation does not provide us with the power to extend the SM&CR to ARs. The Approved Persons Regime (APR) will continue to apply to ARs once the extended SM&CR comes into effect. There is one exception, for Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms that are also ARs for other business. They will be in scope of the SM&CR rather than remaining under the APR. This is because the legal entity is authorised under FSMA. Governing functions at the AR side of these firms will be converted automatically to equivalent Senior Management Functions according to the mapping table for Core and Limited Scope firms (read Chapter 11). Individuals approved as CF30s for the AR will remain approved under this function.

PS18/14
Chapter 11
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 11 Conversion – Core and Limited Scope Firms (including branches) Who should read this chapter This chapter is relevant to Core and Limited Scope firms, and branches. Our proposals
11.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the conversion
approach for Core and Limited Scope firms we consulted on in CP17/40, including:
11 Firms should note that the CF30 – Customer Function will no longer be approved under the SM&CR and is therefore not available for conversion mapping. 12 Non‑Executive Directors at Core and Limited Scope firms who are not the firm’s Chair will no longer be approved by the FCA.

mapping APR controlled functions to SMFs
our proposal to convert relevant approvals at Core and Limited Scope
firms automatically
our approach to new and in‑flight applications by Core and Limited Scope firms
our approach to Core and Limited Scope firms applying for authorisation
(‘applicant firms’)
11.2 The final mapping of APR to SM&CR controlled functions at Core and Limited Scope
firms is set out below.
Table 7: Function mapping for Core and Limited Scope firms (including branches)11
Current controlled function Corresponding Senior Management Function(s) CF1 – Director SMF3 – Executive Director CF2 – Non‑Executive Director12 SMF9 – Chair CF3 – Chief Executive SMF1 – Chief Executive SMF19 – Head of Third Country Branch (Third Country Branches only) CF4 – Partner SMF27 – Partner SMF3 – Executive Director (Third Country Branches only) CF5 – Director of Unincorporated Association SMF3 – Executive Director CF6 – Small Friendly Society Function SMF3 – Executive Director CF8 – Apportionment & Oversight SMF29 – Limited Scope

PS18/14
Chapter 11
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Current controlled function Corresponding Senior Management Function(s) CF10 – Compliance Oversight SMF16 – Compliance Oversight CF11 – Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) SMF17 – MLRO CF29 – Significant Management Function13 SMF21 – EEA Branch Senior Management Function Function mapping for Core and Limited Scope firms Feedback received Q2: Do you have any comments on our proposed mapping of functions for Core and Limited Scope firms?
11.3 There was much support for the proposed mapping of APR functions to SM&CR
functions for Core and Limited Scope firms.
11.4 Respondents made a number of alternative suggestions regarding how CF roles
should map to SMF roles. These included:
13 This mapping only applies for EEA Branches. Individuals holding only CF29 at other Core firms won’t be converted to a Senior Management Function.

that the APR CF29 – Significant Management Function should map to the SMF18 –
Other Overall Responsibility Function
the APR CF1 – Director function should map to the SMF9 – Chair function without
requiring an additional approval for a governing function
11.5 Respondents also asked us to clarify:
what firms should do if they want to map roles in a different way from the proposals
whether Senior Managers subject to automatic conversion have a permanent
exemption from submitting Statements of Responsibilities
if firms with Partners (CF4s) who don’t meet the definition of a Senior Manager
should cancel their approvals ahead of Commencement of the new regime to avoid automatic conversion to an SMF role
whether the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight role will assume responsibility for the
current CF10a – CASS Oversight role
Our response
Alternative mapping suggestions
We have considered the alternative mapping suggestions but have decided not to make any changes to our proposed rules. The SMF18 – Other Overall Responsibility Function won’t apply to Core or Limited

PS18/14
Chapter 11
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Scope firms, so it won’t be possible for these firms to convert existing CF29s to this function. There will be individuals acting as Executive Chairs within the wide range of firms in scope of the extended SM&CR. In CP17/25, we explained that automatic conversion of individuals to the SMF9 – Chair function is not possible. This is because we currently approve Non‑Executive Chairs under the CF2 – Non‑Executive Director function and Executive Chairs are approved under another of the governing functions. As a result, we don’t hold data on which individuals perform the Chair role. If a Core or Limited Scope firm submits a Form K telling us that an individual holding the CF2 function should be converted to the SMF9 – Chair role, the firm does not have to send us a SoR for that person. An Executive Chair currently performing the role under an executive governing function should:

be automatically converted to the relevant governing function SMF
apply for approval to perform SMF9 by submitting short Form A and a
SoR covering both functions
This reflects the additional responsibilities that distinguish an Executive Chair from a Non‑Executive Chair. Clarifications The mapping table set out above shows the only direct conversions that will be possible for Core and Limited Scope firms. If firms need to move an individual into an unmapped role, they must submit either a Form A (to apply for new approval), or a Form E (to transfer an existing approved person to a new role that does map). There is information on our website to help firms work out what they need to do in a variety of scenarios. All Senior Managers should have a SoR, but Core and Limited Scope firms are not required to submit these for people converted at Commencement. This is a ‘one‑off’ exemption that only applies at Commencement. It will enable us to automatically convert the vast number of individuals holding controlled functions under the APR to their relevant Senior Management Function(s). If a SoR is updated after Commencement, the updated version will need to be submitted to us using Form J. Where an individual’s SoR is updated due to a significant change in their responsibilities, firms must send the revised version to the FCA using Form J. This applies regardless of whether the individual was converted or a SoR was previously submitted. Core and Limited Scope firms that submit new applications for approval under the SM&CR must also send a SoR. If firms have individuals currently approved in mappable roles who don’t meet the definition of a Senior Manager, they must submit, before the start of the regime, a Form C to take effect on the start of the regime.

PS18/14
Chapter 11
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms If they don’t, the individual’s function will be shown on the Register as converted to a Senior Management Function at the start of the SM&CR. There is no proposal for the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight Function to assume the responsibilities for the CF10a – CASS Operational Oversight Function under the APR. We have set out additional feedback on CASS in
Chapter 3.
Before they move from the APR to the SM&CR, we encourage firms to consider whether partners currently approved under CF4 – Partner Function meet the SMF definition. If they don’t, then firms will need to submit a Form C to cancel that Partner’s approval. Conversion for Core and Limited Scope firms Feedback received Q3: Do you have any comments on our approach to conversion for Core and Limited Scope firms?
11.6 The majority of respondents agreed with our approach to conversion for Core and
Limited Scope firms.
11.7 Many respondents requested that we provide support to firms during the conversion
process. Suggestions included:

making the forms available as soon as possible
a facility for large firms and trade bodies to test automated systems ahead
of Commencement
dedicated helplines
clarity on what happens if the Register is not updated in time
publishing reminders about firms’ responsibilities
11.8 Some respondents asked us to clarify the process by which firms move or ‘opt‑up’
between the Core and Enhanced tiers.
11.9 A respondent asked us to confirm whether submitting a conversion notification prior
to Commencement is sufficient to meet the obligations under the regime in the event we don’t process the notification or update the Register in a timely manner. Another respondent asked us when the new forms will be available on the Connect system and the processing time of Service Level Agreements (SLA) for SMF roles.

PS18/14
Chapter 11
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Our response Support and systems during conversion To support firms in moving to the SM&CR, we plan to make the relevant forms available in Connect three months before the regime starts. While we won’t allow firms to test the facility in advance, we will install and test our systems to ensure they will be ready for all firms. We have also published material on our website and provided guides to the regime to assist firms in understanding the requirements. In addition, our Customer Contact Centre will be available to help answer any questions. If a firm submits a conversion notification (Form K) prior to Commencement and within the specified time period with all relevant information, this will be sufficient to meet the obligations to transition to the new regime. Opting up In Chapter 6 we explained the process for opting up, once the regime has started, in our response to Q21. We also recognise that some firms will want to opt‑up from the start of the SM&CR. To allow this, we will make it possible for firms to notify us of their intention to opt‑up ahead of Commencement using a pre‑Commencement version of Form O. New and in‑flight applications for Core and Limited Scope firms Feedback received Q4: Do you have any comments on our approach to new and in‑flight applications by Core and Limited Scope firms?
11.10 The majority of respondents agreed with our approach to new and in‑flight
applications by Core and Limited Scope firms.
11.11 Many respondents put forward practical suggestions, including:

having a 12-month gap between publication of the final rules and Commencement
making the new forms available only at Commencement to avoid confusion
providing an online tool to help firms work out which forms to use
11.12 A respondent asked us to clarify whether an in‑flight application using the old Form
A will be converted by:
us granting approval as if it was an APR application and then automatically converting
the role to SM&CR

PS18/14
Chapter 11
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

whether the conversion means it will be treated as an SM&CR application which
requires Statements of Responsibilities
11.13 We were also asked to clarify:
whether the ‘12-week rule’ applies to firms after Commencement if their
applications were not processed by us in time. The rule allows an individual to cover for a Senior Manager without approval for up to 12 weeks
what submitting an application in ‘good time’ means
Our response
Suggested changes to our approach
The Treasury has announced that the extension of the SM&CR to FCA solo‑regulated firms will commence on 9 December 2019. This means that firms have approximately 18 months to prepare for the new regime. Some firms will wish to apply for new individuals to take up SMFs at the start of the new regime. We will, therefore, make the new SM&CR forms available before Commencement so that firms can get these individuals approved as quickly as possible. We are mindful of the need for clarity around APR and SM&CR forms in the lead up to the start of the new regime and have considered this in the design of the amended Connect system. We have published a guide to the regime on our website to help firms understand what they need to do to prepare for the SM&CR. Clarifications In CP17/40, we proposed to convert in‑flight applications automatically and we intend to implement this approach. This covers all applications submitted but not processed by the start of the new regime. If an application submitted by a Core firm is still being processed at the start of the new regime, we will convert the application to one for an SMF. The SMF will become effective at the date of approval. For example, an application under APR for a CF1 – Director function will be converted to an application for SMF3 – Executive Director upon approval. If an application is submitted under the APR, a Statement of Responsibilities will be required to be submitted as soon as possible after Commencement if the application is converted in‑flight (ie is not approved prior to Commencement). The 12-week rule period starts again at the start of the new regime. This means that if an individual is performing an APR controlled function under the 12-week rule at Commencement, and the function converts to an SMF, they can continue to cover this role for up to another 12-weeks without approval. CP17/40 set out our intention to process all applications ahead of conversion, as long as they are submitted in good time. We will

PS18/14
Chapter 11
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms communicate the cut‑off dates to firms nearer to the time. After that date, we can’t guarantee that applications will be processed ahead of the start of the SM&CR. Core and Limited Scope applicant firms Feedback received Q5: Do you agree with our approach to Core and Limited Scope applicant firms?
11.14 Respondents supported our approach to Core and Limited Scope applicant firms.
11.15 Some respondents suggested that our proposal to apply the APR until
Commencement is disproportionate. They suggested a 12-week transition period before Commencement for Limited Scope and Core firms in which we won’t sign‑off new appointments. Our response We will maintain the APR until the start of the SM&CR to avoid a creating a gap in our rules. This also ensures that all relevant approved individuals will be appropriately converted. The existing 12-week rule will continue in force for temporary appointments to Significant Influence Functions (SIFs) until the new regime begins. However, the 12-week rule will not apply to someone whose appointment is meant to be permanent. Therefore, if it is intended that the new person should be in post before the SM&CR begins, the firm will have to apply for them to be approved under the APR even if the gap between appointment and the start of the SM&CR is short. The APR 12-week rule does not apply to the CF30 – Customer Dealing Function.

PS18/14
Chapter 12
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 12 Conversion – Enhanced Firms Who should read this chapter This chapter only applies to Enhanced firms, or firms intending to opt‑up to the Enhanced tier of the regime. Our proposals
12.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the conversion
approach we consulted on in CP17/40, including:
14 Firms should note that the CF30 – Customer Function will no longer be approved under the SM&CR and is therefore not available for conversion mapping.

mapping APR controlled functions to SMFs
converting individuals at Enhanced firms
our approach to new and in‑flight applications by Enhanced firms
our approach to Enhanced applicant firms
12.2 The final mapping of APR to SM&CR controlled functions at Enhanced firms is set
out below.
Table 8: Function mapping for Enhanced firms14
Current controlled function Possible corresponding Senior Management Function(s CF1 – Director SMF2 – Chief Finance Officer SMF3 – Executive Director SMF4 – Chief Risk Officer SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager SMF24 – Chief Operations CF2 – Non‑Executive Director SMF9 – Chair SMF10 – Chair of the Risk Committee SMF11 – Chair of the Audit Committee SMF12 – Chair of the Remuneration Committee SMF13 – Chair of the Nomination Committee SMF14 – Senior Independent Director SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager

PS18/14
Chapter 12
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Current controlled function Possible corresponding Senior Management Function(s CF3 – Chief Executive SMF1 – Chief Executive SMF2 – Chief Finance Officer SMF4 – Chief Risk Officer SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit CF4 – Partner SMF27 – Partner SMF2 – Chief Finance Officer SMF4 – Chief Risk Officer SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit CF5 – Director of Unincorporated Association SMF3 – Executive Director SMF2 – Chief Finance Officer SMF4 – Chief Risk Officer SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit CF6 – Small Friendly Society Function SMF3 – Executive Director SMF2 – Chief Finance Officer SMF4 – Chief Risk Officer SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit CF10 – Compliance Oversight SMF16 – Compliance Oversight CF10a – CASS Operational Oversight Function15 SMF18 – Other Overall Responsibility CF11 – MLRO SMF17 – MLRO CF28 – Systems and Controls Function SMF2 – Chief Finance Officer SMF4 – Chief Risk Officer SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit CF29 – Significant Management Function SMF18 – Other Overall Responsibility SMF24 – Chief Operations Feedback received Function mapping for Enhanced firms Q6: Do you have any comments on our proposed mapping of functions for Enhanced firms?
12.3 Most respondents agreed with our proposed mapping of functions for Enhanced firms.
12.4 Respondents made a number of alternative suggestions regarding how APR functions
should map to SMF roles. These included that:
15 If an Enhanced firm elects not to convert an individual performing a CF10a (CASS Oversight) function to SMF18 (Other Overall Responsibility) function, then this individual will be expected to be certified under the Certification Regime. The CASS Prescribed Responsibility should then be allocated to the Senior Manager to whom to the individual reports.

CF29 should map to SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager

PS18/14
Chapter 12
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms

CF1 – Director should map to SMF9 – Chair
CF10 – Compliance Oversight should map to SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit
12.5 We received a number of responses on the breadth of the SMF24 – Chief Operations
function. These included the thought that there should be a separate SMF for IT and that the responsibilities for risk in the SMF24 role are too large for one person.
12.6 It was suggested that the Enhanced definition of Executive Directors should also cover
Group Executive Directors, as long as they hold a SMF function in at least one entity within the Group.
12.7 One respondent suggested Form K should contain a section to present a case where
a conversion could be allowed against unmapped functions.
12.8 We were asked to clarify:
whether the SM&CR covers both regulated and unregulated subsidiaries
why the CF10 – Compliance Oversight function maps to the SMF24 – Chief
Operations function
if firms will be able to allocate a PR to one individual across several entities
Our response
Alternative mapping of functions
We have decided to implement the function mappings suggested in CP17/40 with two minor changes. These clarify that the CF5 – Director of Unincorporated Association and CF6 – Small Friendly Society Function cannot be converted to the SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Management Function. The conversion of these roles is based on their equivalence. We won’t allow conversion of functions that don’t follow the rules in these tables. To convert unmapped functions, firms will need to apply for new approvals using Form A, or use Form E to transfer individuals between roles. We have not mapped the CF29 – Significant Management Function to the SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager Function. The functions included in the Group Entity Senior Manager Function are currently mainly included in the Director and Non‑Executive Director functions under the APR and so a person currently carrying on the group role should already be approved for the APR Director or Non‑Executive Director functions. There will be individuals acting as Executive Chairs within the wide range of firms in scope of the extended SM&CR. A person currently performing the Chair role as an Executive Chair under a governing function will need to apply for the SMF9 function using a short Form A, in addition to their existing function being converted. This application should be accompanied by a SoR for the individual. Their current governing function should be included on the firm’s Form K.

PS18/14
Chapter 12
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms We have made SMF7 – Group Entity Senior Manager Function a separate function (rather than including it as part of the Executive Director function) as this is a different type of role, and it is important that it is transparent where someone is performing this. The function covers individuals operating in either an executive or non‑executive capacity, whose role in the Group involves exercising significant influence in the UK firm. We have not allowed the conversion of the CF10 – Compliance Oversight Function to the SMF5 – Head of Internal Audit. These are different roles representing different ‘lines of defence’. If a firm has someone they think should map to the Head of Internal Audit Function, this person should currently be approved under the APR Systems and Controls Function, not the Compliance Oversight Function. The SM&CR is designed to fit to a firm’s structure and the application of the SMF24 – Chief Operations function will vary between firms. We set out guidance in SUP 10C.6B on where it may be appropriate for a firm to have more than one SMF24. We have also provided extra guidance on the areas that we would expect to be relevant to the SMF24 function in our Handbook. Clarifications The SM&CR applies on a legal entity basis. This means that we can’t apply elements of the regime at group level. If a regulated firm has an unregulated subsidiary, then the subsidiary won’t be subject to the SM&CR. Whether staff at the subsidiary are subject to the SM&CR will depend on their relationship with the parent entity. It will also depend on whether they meet the test in FSMA 63E(9) to be considered an ‘employee’ of the parent (discussed earlier, in Chapter 5). The application of the Conduct Rules to ‘employees’ of the parent depends on whether their role involves financial services activities. The potential mapping of the existing CF10 – Compliance Oversight Officer to the SMF24 – COO function was an error in the tables presented in the CP. This won’t be a valid scenario for conversion and was not included in the legal instrument consulted on in CP17/40. The CF10 role can only directly map to the SMF16 – Compliance Oversight Function. Conversion for Enhanced firms and applicant firms Feedback received Q7: Do you have any comments on our approach to conversion for Enhanced firms? Q9: Do you agree with our approach to Enhanced applicant firms?

PS18/14
Chapter 12
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
12.9 The majority of respondents agreed with the proposed approach to conversion for
Enhanced firms.
12.10 Several respondents asked us to make the forms available as soon as possible and
allow sufficient time ahead of Commencement for completion.
12.11 We were asked for clarification on whether regulatory references for the
previous 6 years need to be obtained for existing Senior Managers and Certified Staff from Commencement Our response Support and systems during conversion We have addressed this feedback in Chapter 11. Clarifications Firms don’t need to get regulatory references for existing employees, including any Senior Managers and Certified Staff, at Commencement. New and in‑flight applications for Enhanced firms Feedback received Q8: Do you agree with our approach to new and in-flight applications by Enhanced firms?
12.12 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposals for new and in‑flight
applications by Enhanced firms.
12.13 There were concerns that our requirement to list all relevant applications on Form
K could delay when firms are able to submit it. This could be an issue for firms with high staff turnover or restructuring where they might not submit the form until the deadline.
12.14 A respondent asked us to clarify whether the ‘12-week rule’ applies in the case of
in‑flight applications.
Our response
Form K
In designing our approach to Form K submissions we took into account lessons learned from the implementation of the banking regime. To give firms as much time as possible to complete their Form K, we have set a deadline of one week before the start of the new regime to submit this form. This may mean that some firms leave it until quite late and we have factored this into our planning.

PS18/14
Chapter 12
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 12-week rule If an individual performing a role under the 12-week rule before Commencement is still performing that role at the start of the new regime, the 12-week period resets. This means that the individual can use the rule for a role that would otherwise be a Senior Management Function for another 12 weeks. If they are in that role for longer than 12 weeks they will need to be approved by the FCA.

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 13 Forms Who should read this chapter This chapter applies to all firms. Our proposals
13.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the changes to
forms we consulted on in CP17/40.
13.2 The main changes being made to our regulatory forms are set out below. To reduce
the different number of forms, we have combined overlapping versions and brought APR applications for Appointed Representatives into these new SM&CR versions.
Table 9: List of amended/amalgamated forms for FCA solo‑regulated firms
Form Name Affected
Firms
Purpose
Form A (Long) – Application to perform controlled functions including Senior Management Functions All An application for an individual to perform a specified Senior Management Function (or, for Appointed Representatives only, controlled function) at the firm(s). Form A (Short) – Application to perform controlled functions including Senior Management Functions All An application for an individual to perform a specified Senior Management Function (or, for Appointed Representatives only, controlled function) at the firm(s). Form C – Notice of ceasing to perform controlled functions including Senior Management Functions All An application form used to cancel an individual approval. Form D – Changes to personal information/ application details and conduct breaches/disciplinary action related to conduct All Used to notify the FCA of Conduct Rule breaches by Senior Managers, disciplinary action taken against Senior Managers and changes to personal information. Form E – Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo‑regulated firms All An application for an individual to change the approved function being performed. Form I – Application for the Variation of a Conditional Approval for the performance of a Senior Management Function All An application for changes to the conditions associated with a conditional approval to perform a Senior Management Function. Form J – Notification of Significant Changes in Responsibilities of a Senior Management Function Manager All A notification submitted to inform the FCA of significant changes to a Senior Manager’s Statement of Responsibilities.

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Form Name Affected Firms Purpose Form K – Conversion Notification Form – FCA solo‑regulated firms Enhanced, Core on an exceptions basis An application to convert the firm’s approved individuals from the Approved Persons Regime to new functions under the SM&CR. This can also be used to submit updates to a previous Form K. REP008 – Notification of Conduct Rule Breaches and Disciplinary Action All Used to notify the FCA of Conduct Rule breaches (that resulted in disciplinary action) by Certification and Conduct Rules Staff but not SMFs, or to submit a nil return. Statement of Responsibilities for solo‑regulated SM&CR firms All A firm must use this template to create a Senior Manager’s Statement of Responsibilities. At approval it should be attached to a Form A, Form E or Form K submission. A firm must also use this template when preparing an updated SoR and it should be attached to a Form I (application for the variation of a conditional approval) or Form J (notification of a significant change to a SoR) application.
13.3 There are also some changes that we and the PRA are making to the Fitness and
Propriety questions repeated in several solo and dual‑regulated forms. The table below summarises these.
Table 10: List of final amendments to fitness and propriety questions
Form Section Specific
Reference
Explanation of change
Civil Proceedings 5.02.3(c) This question asks whether the candidate is aware of any potential or current proceedings that may lead to a County Court Judgment (CCJ) or judgment debt against them. We have deleted the previous reference to claims over £1000. Civil Proceedings 5.02.8 We have added text to include whether the candidate has ever been found by a judge or tribunal to have lied under oath and/or that their evidence was to be disbelieved. Civil Proceedings 5.02.10 We have added a 10 year time limit to the period in which an individual has to declare if a firm in which the individual has held a position of influence has been:

adjudged by a court to be civilly liable for any fraud,
malfeasance, wrongful trading or other misconduct
the subject of a judgement debt or award against the firm
party to any other civil proceedings which resulted in an
order against the firm other than above

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Changes to forms Feedback received Q10: Do you have any comments on our proposed changes to forms?
13.4 Respondents broadly agreed with the proposed changes to forms.
13.5 A number of respondents provided feedback on our proposed Form A.
They highlighted that the 5-year employment history required by the form was inconsistent with the requirement to obtain 6 years of regulatory references. We were also asked when a firm could use a short Form A.
13.6 Respondents commented on our proposed SoRs form. Some asked whether Core
and Limited Scope firms needed to maintain these. We were also asked to make an editable document available for Core and Limited Scope firms. This would make it easier for them to create and update the SoRs of their Senior Managers.
13.7 Two respondents asked us to restructure the form to make it specific to particular
sectors. Another asked us to provide a template and guidance notes for SoRs.
13.8 We were given feedback on user experience with Connect. These included the ability
to print one document rather than printing in sections and changes to the permissions of users.
13.9 We received some ideas on ways to improve the forms. Suggestions included:

ensuring the offline and online forms are entirely consistent
updating the forms to refer to the GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018 rather than
the Data Protection Act 1998
addressing the difference between the Long Form A which asks for a 5 year
employment history and the regulatory references requirements in our Handbook, which ask for a 6 year employment history Clarifications
13.10 Respondents asked us to clarify:
which forms or sections Appointed Representatives should use
if forms should be submitted electronically or by post
whether a combined Responsibilities Map could be submitted on behalf of a group
what a summary of handover material might involve, as requested in Form A

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Our response Forms and Appointed Representatives As part of our proposals for the extension of the SM&CR, we sought to streamline and reduce the number of regulatory forms. We worked with the PRA to remove the APR forms and relocate the sections that remain relevant to ARs to the new SM&CR versions. ARs should therefore use the same forms as firms that are subject to the SM&CR. There are some sections of forms that are specific to ARs and these are clearly signposted. We think that incorporating these sections into the new forms is a better solution than having a separate form specifically for ARs. To make it clear that ARs must adhere to the APR, we have amended the declarations on forms to refer explicitly to the Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (APER). We confirm that Question 5.05.2 is not relevant for ARs. Form A We acknowledge that our requirements regarding employment history are not identical between Form A and the regulatory reference requirements. When firms apply for Senior Managers to be authorised, we ask for information on their employment history for the last 5 years. Our regulatory reference requirements require firms to obtain 6 years of employment history for Senior Managers and Certified Staff. This was introduced with the banking regime and is mirrored in the extension of the SM&CR. For firms subject to MiFID, European regulations require that we ask for 10 years’ employment history. Whilst the requirements differ, they are not contradictory. We therefore don’t intend to change these rules at this time as we don’t think it would be proportionate for all firms not subject to MiFID to provide 10 years’ employment history. Long Form A should always be used for a Senior Manager or Appointed Representative application, unless the individual meets the criteria for the submission of a Short Form A. Short Form A should be used where:
a) a currently approved individual is applying for an additional controlled function at the same firm b) an individual has stopped holding a controlled function at one firm and now needs approval to perform a controlled function at another firm within six months c) an individual is applying for a controlled function, and is already approved for a corresponding controlled function in the same group of functions (ie governing or required functions).

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Specific detail on the use of forms is set out in our Handbook in SUP 10C
Annex 2G.
Our rules provide guidance on what should be included in handover material in SYSC 25.4 and SUP 10C.10. This is only required for Enhanced firms. Statements of Responsibilities Core and Limited Scope firms don’t have to submit their Senior Managers’ SoRs. They do have to create and maintain them for each individual Senior Manager at the firm from Commencement of the SM&CR. Firms told us that it would be easier to do this if we created a template for them to download and edit. We will consider the best way to help firms understand the requirements and will provide extra material in due course. We don’t think that it is practical to restructure the SoRs form to make it specific to particular sectors. Firms have different business models and structures and need the flexibility to represent these properly. The reference to the Data Protection Act has been updated in separate Handbook amendments, to reflect the recent legislative changes. We have also made consequential changes to bring the declarations sections of our forms into line with the GDPR. We have also considered feedback on differences firms have experienced between the forms in the Handbook and our Connect system. In the Handbook versions, firms will see all questions included on a form, but many of these questions won’t be relevant. For example, a Limited Scope firm looking at Long Form A in the Handbook will see 20 SMFs. However, the majority of these functions won’t be displayed on Connect as they don’t apply to them. Consistency between Handbook and Connect We reviewed the forms to ensure consistency during the drafting of our rules. We have addressed feedback on inconsistencies in forms for our near‑final rules. We will ensure consistency between the Handbook and our systems when these go live on Connect. Some responses about regulatory forms related to user experience with Connect, such as requests for the ability to print forms in one document, rather than printing in sections. If you are experiencing issues using Connect, please contact our Customer Contact Centre for assistance. Clarifications Firms should use our Connect system to submit forms. In the event that FCA systems are unavailable for a prolonged period there may be circumstances in which firms can submit using paper versions of the forms. The SM&CR applies on a legal entity basis, which means that Responsibilities Maps should be drafted at the firm, rather than group, level. Forms will be available three months before the start of the regime.

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Changes to Fitness & Propriety Questions Feedback received Q11: Do you have any feedback on our proposed amendments to the Fitness & Propriety questions?
13.11 The majority of respondents agreed with our proposed amendments.
13.12 Several respondents asked us to confirm that the rules on criminal records checks
comply with current privacy law. Others had specific queries about the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS), for example to confirm that firms will have the authority to register with the DBS. Another suggested that individuals should be able to access the DBS checking service and obtain certificates to submit to employers.
13.13 Some respondents queried the proposed 10 year time period for civil procedures
disclosures. A few suggested a 5 year period was more appropriate and consistent with wider practice. A respondent noted candidates might not be able to answer questions about court judgements involving large firms at which they were an employee.
13.14 Several respondents queried the proposed requirement to disclose involvement in
arbitration proceedings.
13.15 We were asked to confirm that declarations by candidates are sufficient evidence for
firms to meet the employment requirements.
13.16 One respondent was concerned about how professional bodies which issue
Statements of Professional Standing might engage in the SM&CR process, as they believe that it is difficult for trade bodies to discipline members.
13.17 We were also asked whether we will make any changes to the questions in Form
A to reflect the Ministry of Justice consultation on aspects of Default County Court Judgements (CCJs). Our response Fitness and Propriety Questions Employers have legal obligations to process sensitive personal data, such as criminal records. We don’t think it’s appropriate for us to give guidance on privacy law. However, we want firms to be confident that they can comply with the SM&CR. Firms will need to decide how they should obtain the criminal records checks they need. This may be through an umbrella organisation or by registering directly with the DB organisation. Our rules require the firm to obtain a criminal records check, rather than the candidate. A candidate’s declaration in relation to criminal records checks would not be sufficient. We will review any changes to the management of CCJs following the publication of any policy statement by the Ministry of Justice. The new form introduces a time limit to some of the questions about civil proceedings. Previously, there was no time limit on this question.

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms This change is designed to make this requirement more proportionate. We have chosen a time limit of 10 years to recognise that civil proceedings can sometimes take many years to conclude. We think it is reasonable for senior level candidates to disclose whether their previous firms have been subject to civil proceedings if they held a position of influence in those firms. This is because the applicants using the forms will be applying for senior roles and they should be mindful of such information. We removed Question 5.02.3(c), as we considered it to duplicate other questions asked in this section. Disclosure of arbitration proceedings is only required for Solvency II firms. This is set out in our Forms but was incorrectly summarised in CP17/40 as potentially also applying to solo‑regulated firms. Solo‑regulated firms don’t need to complete this section. In relation to the employment requirements, some firms may wish to conduct further checks on what the candidate has declared. It is for firms to decide whether this is appropriate. Professional bodies Professional bodies and trade bodies have an important role to play in strengthening professionalism amongst their membership. We expect all bodies with responsibility for standards of professionalism of a group of individuals involved in UK financial services, whether through Royal Charter or otherwise, to have systems and controls in place to effectively supervise and enforce non‑compliance by their members. Where they issue Statements of Professional Standing, we already expect Accredited Bodies16 to act in the public interest. They should work to raise consumer confidence and professional standards in retail investment advice and promote the profession.17 Application of REP008 and the late returns fee Feedback received Q12: Do you have any comments on our proposal to extend the use of REP008 to all SM&CR firms? Q13: Do you have any comments on our proposal to require a nil return to be submitted where no Conduct Rules breaches have occurred, and to apply the late returns fee to late or non‑submitters of REP008? 16 www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/glossary/?filter‑title=ACCREDITED+BODIES 17 www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/TC/App/6/1.html

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
13.18 The majority of respondents supported our proposed extension of REP008 to all
SM&CR firms. Respondents generally supported our proposal to require a nil return and extend the late returns fee for late or non‑submission.
13.19 Some suggested that REP008 and the nil returns requirement should not apply to
different types of Limited Scope firms.
13.20 One suggested that for groups where employees have roles at multiple subsidiaries,
it would be difficult to identify which legal entity should submit the report. In these cases a group return would be more suitable.
13.21 Several respondents requested we send reminders to firms ahead of the REP008 due
submission date. Another respondent asked us to allow firms to set a timetable that aligns with other relevant regulatory reporting dates.
13.22 There were some questions about our proposal on nil returns. They included:

the argument that if REP008 is not submitted it is reasonable to assume a breach
has not occurred
the suggestion that it is inconsistent to require a sole trader to submit a
self‑certifying return each year
13.23 We were also asked for more guidance on the reporting of Conduct Rule breaches.
Our response
Our Conduct Rules are intended to drive up standards of behaviour in financial services. They represent a meaningful change in the standards of behaviour we expect from people working in the industry. For this reason they will apply to all solo‑regulated firms, including those in the Limited Scope tier. Group submissions The SM&CR applies on a legal entity basis and our Conduct Rule reporting requirements are consistent with this. If an individual works across more than one entity within a group, breaches should be reported under the firm in which the individual meets the definition of an employee, and was undertaking the activity related to the breach. Under FSMA s.63E(9), an employee in this context is defined as:
a person who personally provides, or is under an obligation personally
to provide, services to [a firm] under an arrangement made between [a firm] and the person providing the services or another person, and
is subject to (or to the right of) supervision, direction or control by [a
firm] as to the manner in which those services are provided

PS18/14
Chapter 13
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Reporting schedules and reminders We have considered aligning the annual reporting requirement to a firm’s existing regulatory reporting schedule. We understand this could be helpful to some firms. However, the requirement is designed to align with the banking regime and provide a consistent industry reporting date. For firms with mixed groups (eg banking groups that contain asset managers), we understand that changes could create a complex and inconsistent set of requirements. It would mean different entities having to report the same information for different periods. We want to be able to compare the same period of data across the whole industry. We therefore intend to retain the proposed reporting period of 1 September to 31 August each year for the majority of firms. For Limited Permission Consumer Credit firms – the majority of whom constitute our very smallest firms – we have decided to align the reporting period for this return with their annual reporting cycle. We considered whether it would be appropriate to extend this change to other small firms but concluded that it is only appropriate to do so for these particular firms. As with all of our regulatory reporting, firms will receive 3 email reminders from our GABRIEL reporting system ahead of the REP008 due date. Nil returns and the late returns fee As the Conduct Rules are designed to raise standards of conduct across the industry, we think that it is appropriate and proportionate to ask firms to confirm whether there have been any Conduct Rule breaches during the year. Where there have been none we will make it quick and easy to confirm this through a nil return on GABRIEL. It will clarify whether a firm has had no Conduct Rule breaches during the period, or has simply failed to report those that have occurred. This will help us assess trends across the industry. REP008 will apply to sole traders because the Conduct Rules will apply to employees of a sole trader, where they have staff. We won’t be able to distinguish between sole traders with employees, and those without. The circumstances of these firms may change over time. Where a sole trader has no employees, it will be quick and simple for them to submit a nil return using GABRIEL.

PS18/14
Chapter 14
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 14 Consequentials Who should read this chapter This chapter applies to all firms. Our proposals
14.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on the consequential
amendments proposed in CP17/40.
14.2 These included:

a series of consequential amendments to reflect the retention of the APR for ARs
amendments to glossary definitions
the application of gender‑neutral language
extra guidance on the SMF24 – Chief Operations function
Consequential amendments
Feedback received
Q14: Do you have any comments on our proposed consequential amendments?
14.3 Respondents broadly agreed with the proposals.
14.4 Some respondents suggested subjecting firms to both the APR and SM&CR might
confuse and burden firms. One person asked us to explain why we plan to retain the APR for ARs. Some others asked us to clarify how principal firms subject to the SM&CR should oversee ARs subject to the APR.
14.5 There were requests to re‑structure our Handbook into different sections covering
each type of firm or business eg asset managers, intermediaries, credit firms. Another person asked us to establish separate rulebooks for Limited Scope, Core and Enhanced firms. One other suggested that an SMF’s SoR form should only reference the list in SYSC 25 Annex 1 if the activities are relevant to their industry sector. We were also asked to confirm that references to ‘shared services’ relate to banks and not asset managers.

PS18/14
Chapter 14
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
14.6 One respondent expressed concern that we had classified the proposed changes
to the remit of SMF24 – Chief Operations function as ‘consequential amendments’. Two further respondents were concerned that the categorisation of SMF24 is not appropriate for all firms. Another asked us to confirm that only one individual holds the SMF24 function. Our response APR and the SM&CR The APR and the SM&CR won’t apply at the same time to the same firms. As soon as the SM&CR commences, APR will no longer apply to FSMA‑authorised firms. As previously stated, the APR will continue to apply to Appointed Representatives. This is because the legislation does not give us power to apply the SM&CR to them. Principal firms, including the Senior Managers of principal firms, remain fully responsible for ensuring that their ARs and networks comply with our rules, including the APR. Firms should already have structures and processes in place to do this. Structure of Handbook We recognise that there are different sections in our Handbook that firms need to navigate to understand the SM&CR. However, most elements of the SM&CR are applicable to all firms. For example, the Certification Regime, the Conduct Rules and Fit & Proper requirements are the same for almost every firm. This means that creating sourcebooks for each tier of the regime would lead to a lot of duplication in our Handbook. SYSC 23 summarises the whole of the SM&CR and explains where the relevant Handbook material can be found for each element. The main differences are in how the Senior Managers Regime applies to firms. In particular, the SMFs and PRs that apply, and the rules around Overall Responsibility, Responsibilities Maps and handover procedures. We have tried to mark these clearly in the Handbook, for example using tables showing how the requirements apply to different firms. We also flagged in our Mission that we would review our Handbook after the work on the outcome on EU withdrawal is clear. Until then, we don’t intend to do further work on changing the structure of our Handbook. SYSC 25 Annex 1 We confirm that there is no requirement for firms to refer to the activities and business areas in SYSC 25 Annex 1. This is made clear in SYSC 25.7.2 and in 8.27 of CP17/25 – ‘Firms may find it useful to refer to Annex 1 of SYSC 25 as a starting prompt to think about their own business is organised, but this is not mandatory or exhaustive’. There is similar guidance on Form A that makes it clear that this Annex is not mandatory or exhaustive.

PS18/14
Chapter 14
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Chief Operations Function We have set out a number of examples of how the SMF24 – Chief Operations Function could apply, in SUP 10C.6B. This will depend on how the firm is organised and how it has allocated responsibility for the firm’s internal operations and technology. We confirm that the additional guidance on SMF24 – Chief Operations Function, including on shared services, applies to all Enhanced firms, not just banking firms. We have given further feedback on this function in the section on SMFs for Enhanced firms.

PS18/14
Chapter 15
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms 15 Changes affecting banking firms Who should read this chapter This chapter only applies to banking firms. Our proposals
15.1 This chapter contains our response to the feedback we received on our proposed
changes affecting banking firms.
Conduct Rules PR implementation date
Feedback received
Q15: Do you agree with our proposal to implement the new Conduct Rules Prescribed Responsibility for firms subject to the Banking Regime ahead of the Commencement of the extended SM&CR?
15.2 The majority of respondents agreed with the timing approach for implementing the
new Conduct Rules PR.
15.3 Several respondents made suggestions:

Commencement for banks should be the same as for the wider regime, with banks
implementing the change ahead of time on a voluntary basis
the PR holder should be required to have professional qualifications or meet
professional standards
Our response
Banking firms are already required to train staff on the Conduct Rules. We think that allocation of the new PR is an incremental change for these firms. We will implement the new PR on 1 November 2018 and intend to make the relevant updated forms available for submission from the first half of September. Firms must submit the relevant documentation by 1 November. By commencing the PR ahead of the Commencement date for insurers, we will ensure that we are able to efficiently process Forms J and updated SoRs, and avoid unnecessary delays.

PS18/14
Chapter 15
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms We don’t think that it would be appropriate to require the PR holder to hold specific qualifications. It is for firms to determine who the most appropriate Senior Manager to hold the PR. Application of the Late Returns Fee for REP008 to banking firms Feedback received Q16: Do you have any comments on our proposal to apply the late returns fee to late or non‑submitters of REP008?
15.4 Respondents agreed with the proposed changes.
Our response
We will apply the Late Returns Fee as planned.

PS18/14
Annex 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Annex 1
List of non‑confidential respondents
This Policy Statement incorporates feedback to two SM&CR Consultation Papers for solo‑regulated firms – CP17/25 and CP17/40. Where relevant, feedback to the equivalent CPs for insurers (CP17/26 and CP17/41) has also been considered. We also engaged over 2000 individuals as part of our regional and industry engagement. We have included respondents who only provided feedback on the Register but this feedback will be fed into a separate consultation in due course. The following respondents provided non‑confidential feedback to our consultations:
CP17/25
Ablestoke Wealth Management
Aegon UK
Age Partnership
Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) & Managed Funds Association (MFA) AJ Bell Alan Duff Alan Kendrick Alastair Lyon Alex De Silva & Co Alva Capital Amati Global Investors Anders Bayley Scott Anderson Strathern Andrew Formica Ashlea Financial Planning Ashwood Tax & Law Aspley Compliance Association of British Credit Unions (ABCUL) Association for Financial Markets in Europe (AFME) & UK Finance Association of Foreign Banks (AFB) Association of Investment Companies (AIC) Association of Mortgage Intermediaries (AMI) Association of Member‑Directed Pension Schemes (AMPS) Association of Professional Compliance Consultants (APCC) Association of Short Term Lenders (ASTL) AXA UK Banking Standards Board (BSB) British Insurance Brokers Association (BIBA) BNY Mellon Board Strategy Bovill BPH Wealth Management British Retail Consortium (BRC) Brenda Santimano Brewin Dolphin

PS18/14
Annex 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms British Property Federation Broker Network Bryan Hollingsworth Building Societies Association (BSA) British Private Equity and Private Capital Association (BVCA) Callcredit Information Group Cambrian Associates Cameron Hume Capital One Charles Stanley & Co Chartered Banker Institute (CBI) Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors (CIIA) Christmas Financial Planners Chartered Institute of Insurers (CII) & Personal Finance Society (PFS) Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment (CISI) Clearview Independent Financial Advisors Confederation of British Industry (CBI) Consumer Finance Association (CFA) Coventry Building Society Credit Services Association (CSA) David Booth David de Freitas Dave Knight Dennis Hall Dentons Derek Baptist Derek Mckechnie Dewhurst Torevell & Co DWF Eastern Financial Consultants Elementary Financial Planning Elm Partners Management (UK) ELP Wealth Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) Enhance Support Solutions Equilibrium Asset Management ETF Securities (UK) European American Capital Services European Venues & Intermediaries Association (EVIA) Express Gifts Finance & Leasing Association (FLA) Financial Escape Financial Services Consumer Panel (FSCP) Fox Williams Fulcrum Compliance Funding Knight FXPRO UK Gemini Compliance Solutions GP Consulting GQ Employment Law Graham Pratley Grant Thornton GVS Prepaid

PS18/14
Annex 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Hargreaves Lansdown Hartley Wadsworth and Partners Hartsfield Financial Services Henson Crisp HomeServe Membership HSBC Ian Line Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales (ICAEW) ICE Futures Europe IDS Financial Services IFS Wealth & Pensions Independent Wealth Management Consultants Invesco Perpetual Investment Association (IA) Investor in Customers Irish League of Credit Unions (ILCU) Janus Henderson Investors JM Finn & Co Just Financial Group Kevin A Render Kevin Titmus Killik & Co Kingsley Napley KR Group Lark Group & Aston Scott Latham & Watkins LEBC Group LGT Vestra Little Venice Partners Liverpool John Moores University Loans 2 Go London and International Insurance Brokers' Association (LIIBA) Margaret Abrahams Mark Henderson Matrix Solutions Matthew Lambe McInroy & Wood Medics Financial Services Medius Consulting Mortgage Wyse Mr R.J. Martin My Jar N M Rothschild & Sons National Franchised Dealers Association (NFDA) National Pawnbrokers Association (NPA) Neil Rowland Nick Muir Otus Paul Wallis Financial Solutions Peter Dart Phillips 66 PI Financial Personal Investment Management and Financial Advice Association (PIMFA)

PS18/14
Annex 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms Plutus Wealth Management Premium Credit Questa Chartered Quilter Cheviot Investment Management Raymond James Red Sky Capital Solutions Responsible Finance RFIB Group Rhys Jackson Riverfall Financial Rixons Wealth Management RKH Specialty Robinson Investment Solutions Rosediem Royal & Sun Alliance Russ Bubley SA Compliance Management Saga Services Schroders Sesame Bankhall Group Seven Financial Group ShareAction Simmons & Simmons SimplyBiz Group Society of Lloyd's Society Of Pension Professionals SSE St James Place Wealth Management Stirling House Financial Services Stockdale Asset Management Stonehage Fleming UK Strategic Insight TC Compliance Services Tenet The Cattellyst Consultancy The CFA Society The Law Society The Money Advice Trust The Pension Drawdown Company Thompson Heath and Bond THB Risk Solutions Thomson Gray Wealth Management Threesixty Services Throgmorton Financial Services Tilney Financial Planning Tax Incentivised Savings Association (TISA) TMA Mortgage Club Tom Ogg True Potential Wealth Management Truly Independent UK Crowdfunding Association (UKCFA) Unbiased Financial Group Unicorn Underwriting

PS18/14
Annex 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms USSIM Virgin Money Vouched For Wealth Harbour Services Wescot Credit Services Whitechurch Securities Willis Towers Watson Worksmart Zedra Trust Company (UK) Zurich CP17/40 Association of Professional Compliance Consultants (APCC) Aviva Connells Create Solutions European Venues & Intermediaries Association (EVIA) The Investment Association (IA) Money Advice Trust RKH Specialty Limited Rosediem

PS18/14
Annex 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Annex 2
Abbreviations in this document
AFM Authorised Fund Manager
AIF Alternative Investment Fund
AIFMD Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive APER Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (Handbook) APF Authorised Professional Firm APR Approved Persons Regime AUM Assets Under Management Banking firms Banks, Building Societies, Credit Unions and PRA‑designated Investment Firms BIPRU Prudential sourcebook for Banks, Building Societies and Investment Firms (Handbook) CASS Client Assets Sourcebook (Handbook) CBA Cost Benefit Analysis CCJ County Court Judgment CF Controlled Function COCON Conduct Rules (Handbook) COLL Collective Investment Schemes Sourcebook (Handbook) CP Consultation Paper CRD Capital Requirements Directive DBS Disclosure and Barring Service DEPP Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual (Handbook) EEA European Economic Area EU European Union F&P Fitness and Propriety FCA Financial Conduct Authority FEMR Fair and Effective Markets Review FIT The Fit and Proper Test for Approved Persons (Handbook) FSMA Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 GDPR General Data Protection Regulation HR Human Resources IFPRU Prudential Sourcebook for Investment Firms (Handbook) IT Information Technology

PS18/14
Annex 2
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms MiFID Markets in Financial Instruments Directive MRT Material Risk Taker PCBS Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards PR Prescribed Responsibility PRA Prudential Regulation Authority RMAR Retail Mediation Activities Return SIF Significant Influence Function SLA Service Level Agreement SM&CR Senior Managers and Certification Regime SMF Senior Management Function SMR Senior Managers Regime SUP Supervision Manual (Handbook) SYSC Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls (Handbook) TC Training and Competence Sourcebook (Handbook) UCITS Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities UK United Kingdom Disclaimer We have developed the policy in this Consultation Paper in the context of the existing UK and EU regulatory framework. The Government has made clear that it will continue to implement and apply EU law until the UK has left the EU. We will keep the proposals under review to assess whether any amendments may be required in the event of changes in the UK regulatory framework in the future. We make all responses to formal consultation available for public inspection unless the respondent requests otherwise. We will not regard a standard confidentiality statement in an email message as a request for non‑disclosure. Despite this, we may be asked to disclose a confidential response under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. We may consult you if we receive such a request. Any decision we make not to disclose the response is reviewable by the Information Commissioner and the Information Rights Tribunal. You can download this Consultation Paper from our website: www.fca.org.uk. All our publications are available to download from www.fca.org.uk. If you would like to receive this paper in an alternative format, please call 020 706 0790 or email: publications_graphics@fca.org.uk or write to: Editorial and Digital team, Financial Conduct Authority, 12 Endeavour Square, London E20 1JN

PS18/14
Appendix 1
Financial Conduct Authority
Extending the Senior Managers & Certification Regime to FCA firms
Appendix 1
Near-Final Rules

FCA 2018/XX
INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY (FCA-AUTHORISED FIRMS) INSTRUMENT Powers exercised A. The Financial Conduct Authority makes this instrument in the exercise of the following powers and related provisions in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“the Act”):
(1) section 55U (Applications under this Part); (2) section 59 (Approval for particular arrangements); (3) section 59AB(1) (Specifying functions as controlled functions: transitional provision); (4) section 60 (Applications for approval); (5) section 60A (Vetting candidates by authorised persons); (6) section 61 (Determination of applications); (7) section 62A (Changes to responsibilities of senior managers); (8) section 63ZA (Variation of senior manager’s approval at request of authorised person); (9) section 63ZD (Statement of policy relating to conditional approval and variation); (10) section 63C (Statement of policy); (11) section 63E (Certification of employees by authorised persons); (12) section 63F (Issuing of certificates); (13) section 64A (Rules of conduct); (14) section 64C (Requirements for authorised persons to notify regulator of disciplinary action); (15) section 69 (Statement of policy); (16) section 137A (The FCA’s general rules); (17) section 137T (General supplementary powers); (18) section 138D (Action for damages); (19) section 139A (Power of the FCA to give guidance); (20) section 395 (The FCA’s and PRA’s procedures); and (21) paragraph 23 of Schedule 1ZA (Fees). B. The rule-making powers listed above are specified for the purpose of section 138G(2) (Rule-making instruments) of the Act. Commencement
C. This instrument comes into force on [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for soloregulated firms] except as follows :
Annex Date comes into force
Part 1 of Annex B [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main
commencement date for solo-regulated firms]

FCA 2018/XX
Part 1 of Annex J [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main
commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
Part 1 of Annex Q [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main
commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
Part 2 of Annex A [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main
commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
Part 2 of Annex C [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main
commencement date for solo-regulated firms] Amendments to the Handbook D. The FCA’s Handbook of rules and guidance is amended in accordance with paragraphs E and F of this instrument. E. The modules of the FCA’s Handbook of rules and guidance listed in column (1) below are amended in accordance with the Annexes to this instrument listed in column (2) below:
(1) (2)
Glossary of definitions Annex A
Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls sourcebook (SYSC)
Annex B
Code of Conduct (COCON) Annex C
Threshold Conditions (COND) Annex D
Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (APER)
Annex E
Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel (FIT) Annex F Prudential sourcebook for Investment Firms (IFPRU) Annex G Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS) Annex H Client Assets (CASS) Annex I Supervision manual (SUP) Annex J Dispute Resolution: Complaints (DISP) Annex K Credit Unions sourcebook (CREDS) Annex L F. In each case in which one of the Annexes listed in column (2) of the table in paragraph E of this instrument says that the module of the FCA’s Handbook of rules and guidance to which that Annex relates is amended by inserting a new form into that module as set out in Annex Q of this instrument, that module is amended accordingly. Amendments to the material outside the Handbook G. The material outside the Handbook listed in column (1) below is amended in accordance with the Annexes to this instrument listed in column (2) below:

FCA 2018/XX
(1) (2)
The Energy Market Participants guide (EMPS) Annex M The Oil Market Participants guide (OMPS) Annex N Service companies guide (SERV) Annex O General guidance on Benchmark Administration, Contribution and Use (BENCH)
Annex P
Text amended by this instrument
H. The amendments made by this instrument are to the Handbook and the material listed in paragraph G of this instrument as amended by the Individual Accountability (DualRegulated Firms) Instrument 2018. Citation
I. This instrument may be cited as the Individual Accountability (FCA-Authorised
Firms) Instrument 2018.
By order of the Board
[date] 2018

FCA 2018/XX
Annex A
Amendments to the Glossary of definitions In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text, unless otherwise stated.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
Insert the following new definitions in the appropriate alphabetical position. The text is not underlined. APER employer (in APER and in relation to an approved person whose approval is given under SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives):
(a) the appointed representative in relation to which that approved person performs the controlled function in SUP 10A; and (b) the authorised approved person employer. [Note: For the purposes of Statements of Principle 5 to 7 the APER employer only includes (a).] chair of the audit committee function FCA controlled function SMF11 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.5A.9R. chair of the governing body function FCA controlled function SMF9 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.5A.7R. chair of the remuneration committee function FCA controlled function SMF12 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.5A.10R. chair of the risk committee function FCA controlled function SMF10 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.5A.8R. chief finance officer function FCA controlled function SMF2 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.6A.3R.

FCA 2018/XX chief operations function
FCA controlled function SMF24 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.6B.2R. chief risk officer function FCA controlled function SMF4 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.6A.4R. core SMCR firm a firm identified as a core SMCR firm in the decision tree in SYSC 23 Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR firms). EEA core SMCR firm a core SMCR firm that is an incoming EEA firm or incoming Treaty firm. enhanced scope SMCR firm a firm identified as an enhanced scope SMCR firm in the decision tree in SYSC 23 Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR firms). group entity senior manager function FCA controlled function SMF7 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.5B.1R. head of internal audit function FCA controlled function SMF5 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.6A.6R. head of third country branch function FCA controlled function SMF19 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.5.24R. limited scope function FCA controlled function SMF29 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.6.5R. limited scope SMCR firm a firm identified as a limited scope SMCR firm in the decision tree in SYSC 23 Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR firms). non-SMF board director subject to competence requirements (in relation to an SMCR firm) a board director of the firm who meets the following conditions:
(a) they are not an SMF manager of the firm; and (b) the firm is required to assess their fitness and propriety under the competent employee rule, SYSC 28 (Insurance distribution: specific knowledge, ability and good repute requirements) any directly applicable EU legislation or any other requirement of the regulatory system.

FCA 2018/XX overseas core SMCR firm a core SMCR firm that is an overseas firm. senior independent director function FCA controlled function SMF14 in the table of FCA-designated senior management functions, described more fully in SUP 10C.5A.11R. UK core SMCR firm a core SMCR firm that is a UK domestic firm. Amend the following definitions as shown. accountable functions (in relation to an approved person) the functions described in APER 1.1A.2R, which are in summary:
(a) FCA controlled functions under SUP 10A (FCA Approved persons in Appointed Representatives); and … advising on investments (1) (except in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives), SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime: Certification regime), APER and CONRED 2) the regulated activities, specified in articles 53(1) to (1D) of the Regulated Activities Order (Advising on investments), which are:
(a) advising on investments (except P2P agreements); and (b) advising on P2P agreements. (2) (in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives), SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime: Certification regime) and APER) the regulated activities specified in articles 53(1) to (1D) and 53(2) (Advising on investments) of the Regulated Activities Order. For these purposes, advising on investments includes any activities that would be included but for the exclusion in
article 72AA (Managers of UCITS and AIFs) of the
Regulated Activities Order. certification employee … (2) … (3) (in relation to an SMCR firm that is an FCA-authorised person) an employee (as defined in section 63E of the Act)

FCA 2018/XX of an SMCR firm who performs a certification function under an arrangement entered into by the SMCR firm in relation to the carrying on by the SMCR firm of a regulated activity, even though the obligation of the SMCR firm to issue a certificate under section 63F of the Act has not yet come into force. [Note: Paragraph (3) of this definition applies until [ ] 20[ ] [one year after commencement for solo-regulated firms].] chief executive function (1) (for an SMCR firm) FCA controlled function SMF1 in the
table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.5.21R;
(2) (in relation to an appointed representative) FCA controlled function CF3 the table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.6.17R. compliance oversight function (1) (for SMCR firms) FCA controlled function SMF16 in the
table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.6.1R; and .
(2) (for other firms) FCA controlled function CF10 in the table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.7.8R. compliance requirements for SMCR firms any of the following requirements:
(a) SYSC 3.2.8R (The compliance function); (b) SYSC 6.1 (Compliance); (c) article 22 of the MiFID Org Regulation (Compliance); or (d) article 22 of the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R); or (e) article 61 of the AIFMD level 2 regulation (Permanent compliance function). controlled function a function, relating to the carrying on of a regulated activity by a firm, which is specified by:
(a) either the FCA in:
(i) (for SMCR firms) the table of FCA-designated senior management functions; or

FCA 2018/XX
(ii) (for other firms and in relation to appointed representatives) the table of FCA controlled functions; or … director (1) … … (c) (in SYSC, COCON, MIPRU 2 (Responsibility for insurance distribution and MCD credit intermediation activity), SUP 10A (FCA Approved persons in Appointed Representatives) and SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms) a partnership; (d) (in SYSC and , SUP 10A (FCA Approved persons) and SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms) a sole trader; … … employee … (4A) (for the purposes of SYSC 22 (Regulatory references)) has the same meaning as in (3) and, in addition, includes a person who:
…
(c) performs any service or function for another person (“the employer”) in their capacity as an employee of another member of the employer’s group. For the purpose of (c) an employee of another member of the employer’s group means:
…
(iii) a person who performs a function of that group member under an arrangement entered into by the group member or a contractor of the group member; or (d) is a board director of a person (the “employer”) who is not an SMF manager or certification employee of the employer.

FCA 2018/XX
FCA controlled function a controlled function which is specified by the FCA under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) in:
(a) (for SMCR firms) the table of FCA-designated senior management functions; or (b) (for other firms and in relation to appointed representatives) the table of FCA controlled functions. FCA required functions any of the FCA controlled functions labelled as FCA required functions in :
(a) (for SMCR firms) the table of FCA-designated senior management functions; or . (b) (for other firms) the table of FCA controlled functions. internal audit requirements for SMCR firms any of the following requirements:
(a) SYSC 3 (Systems and controls) insofar as it relates to internal audit; (b) SYSC 6.2 (Internal audit); (c) article 24 of the MiFID Org Regulation (Internal audit); or (d) article 24 of the MiFID Org Regulation (Internal audit) (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1
Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1
3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R); or
(e) article 62 of the AIFMD level 2 regulation (Permanent internal audit function). money laundering reporting function (1) (for SMCR firms) FCA controlled function SMF17 in the
table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.6.2R; and .
(2) (for other firms) FCA controlled function CF11 in of the
table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in
SUP 10A.7.10R. partner function (1) (for an SMCR firm) FCA controlled function SMF27 in the
table of FCA-designated senior management functions,
described more fully in SUP 10C.5.14R to SUP 10C.5.17R SUP 10C.5.19R; (2) (for other firms and in relation to appointed representatives) FCA controlled function CF4 in the table of FCA controlled

FCA 2018/XX functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.6.23R to SUP 10A.6.27R. proprietary trader (in SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Certification regime), SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives), COCON and APER) a person (A) whose responsibilities include committing another person (B) as
part of B’s proprietary trading.
proprietary trading (in SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Certification regime), SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives), COCON and APER) dealing in investments as principal as part of a business of trading in specified investments. For these purposes dealing in investments as principal includes any activities that would be included but for the exclusion in Article 15 (Absence of holding out), Article 16 (Dealing in contractually based investments) or, for a UK AIFM or UK UCITS management company, article 72AA (Managers of UCITS and AIFs) of the Regulated Activities Order. risk control requirements for SMCR firms any of the following requirements:
(a) SYSC 3 (Systems and Controls) insofar as it relates to risk controls; (b) SYSC 7.1.6R, SYSC 7.1.21R and SYSC 7.1.22R; (c) COLL 6.11 (Risk control and internal reporting); (d) article 23 of the MiFID Org Regulation (Risk management); or (e) article 23(2) of the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R); or (f) articles 38 to 45 of the AIFMD level 2 regulation (Risk management). significant-influence function (for the purposes of controlled functions specified in SUP 10A (FCA Approved persons in Appointed Representatives) and in relation to the carrying on of a regulated activity by an authorised person) a function that is likely to enable the person responsible for its performance to exercise a significant influence on the conduct of the authorised person’s affairs, so far as relating to the activity. staff being assessed under FIT (in FIT and in relation to an SMCR firm) those persons set out in FIT 1.1.1G(4) to (7) (8).

FCA 2018/XX
Delete the following definitions. The text is not shown struck through. apportionment and oversight function FCA controlled function CF8 in the table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.7.1R. CASS operational oversight function FCA controlled function CF10a in the table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.7.9R. significant management function FCA controlled function CF29 in the table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.9.9R. small friendly society function FCA controlled function CF6 in the table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.6.31R to SUP 10A.6.32R. systems and controls function FCA controlled function CF28 in the table of FCA controlled functions, described more fully in SUP 10A.8.1R and SUP 10A.8.1AR.
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main commencement date for soloregulated firms]
certification employee …
(3) (in relation to an SMCR firm that is an FCA-authorised person) an employee (as defined in section 63E of the Act) of an SMCR firm who performs a certification function under an arrangement entered into by the SMCR firm in relation to the carrying on by the SMCR firm of a regulated activity, even though the obligation of the SMCR firm to issue a certificate under section 63F of the Act has not yet come into force. [Note: Paragraph (3) of this definition applies until [ ] 2020 [one year after commencement for solo-regulated firms].]

FCA 2018/XX
Annex B
Amendments to the Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls sourcebook (SYSC) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text, unless otherwise stated.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [about three months before main commencement date for
solo-regulated firms]
TP 7 Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016: Certification and regulatory references
7.1 Application and purpose
…
7.1.2 R Table: Application of SYSC TP 7
Type of firm Parts of SYSC TP 7 that apply A firm in the insurance sector except one in the following row All applies except SYSC TP 7.7 A Solvency II firm (including a large nondirective insurer) All applies except as follows:
...
(3) …
(4) SYSC TP 7.7 does not apply.
A core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope SMCR firm and a limited scope SMCR firm All applies All other firms Only SYSC TP 7.4.6R, SYSC TP 7.4.7G, SYSC TP
7.6 apply applies.
7.1.3 G SYSC TP 7:

FCA 2018/XX
(1) explains how the certification regime described in SYSC 27 applies during the certification transitional period periods described in SYSC TP 7.2.1G; … (3) has certain other transitional provisions relating to the amendments made to the FCA Handbook by the Individual Accountability (DualRegulated Firms) Instrument 2018 and the Individual Accountability (FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018.
7.1.4 G (1) The main time period for which SYSC TP 7 operates is 2018 to 2019
20[ ] [year after the main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]. … …
7.1.6 R Table: glossary of bespoke terms used in SYSC TP 7
Part Two: Dates
(1)
Defined term
(2)
Meaning: Insurers
(3)
Meaning: Others certification transitional period … 20[ ] to 20[ ] [the one year period following the main commencement date for soloregulated firms] general commencement date … 20[ ] [the main commencement date for solo-regulated firms] Note (1): Column (2) (Insurers) applies to a firm in the insurance sector (to the extent that SYSC TP 7 applies to such firms). Note (2): Column (3) (Others) applies to a core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope SMCR firm and a limited scope SMCR firm. …
7.4 Transitional provisions about regulatory references
…

FCA 2018/XX
7.4.2 R SYSC 22.2.1R (Obligation to obtain a regulatory reference) does not apply to
an application for approval as an approved person that:
(1) is made before the general commencement date and is continued in force by SUP TP 11.7 or SUP TP 12.7 (In-flight applications:
Conversion); or
(2) is made under SUP TP 11.15 or SUP TP 12.15 (Applications of approved persons to take effect from the commencement date). …
7.6.2 G …
7.7 Qualification conditions for FCA-authorised firms
Firm classification: Effect of pre-commencement events
7.7.1 R If a firm is treated as a core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope SMCR firm or a
limited scope SMCR firm before the general commencement date for the purposes of SUP TP 12 (Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016:
Approved persons in solo-regulated firms) it retains that status after the general commencement date unless and until it changes under SYSC 23
Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR firms).
7.7.2 G For example if before the general commencement date a firm has opted up
to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm it remains an enhanced scope SMCR firm after the general commencement date. It may then elect to cease being an enhanced scope SMCR firm using a Form O under the procedure in SYSC 23 Annex 1 unless it also meets one of the other qualifications for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm. Financial qualification conditions for enhanced scope SMCR firms
7.7.3 G (1) SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R deals with cases in which the period in
relation to which the financial calculations are made to test whether a firm meets one of the financial qualification conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm is adjusted because the relevant reporting requirements did not apply for the whole period. SYSC 23
Annex 1 7.16G gives examples of why this may happen.
(2) Another reason why SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R may apply is that the relevant reporting requirements have not existed for the whole of the period. A particular example of this is consumer credit reporting requirements. At the time the financial qualification conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm first came into force in 20[ ] [the year in which the main commencement date for solo-regulated firms falls], the relevant reporting requirements had not existed for a full three years.

FCA 2018/XX
7.7.4 G A calculation period, an averaging period or a reporting period as referred to
in Part Seven of SYSC 23 Annex 1 (Part Seven: Financial qualification condition for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm) may begin or end before the general commencement date.
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
1 Application and purpose
1.1A Application
…
1.1A.1A G The application of this sourcebook to specific firms that are not PRAauthorised persons is summarised at a high level in the following table. The detailed application is cut back in SYSC 1 Annex 1 and in the text of each
chapter.
Type of firm Applicable chapters
Full-scope UK
AIFM
Chapters 4 to 10, 12, 18, 19B, 19F.2, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 BIPRU firm (including a third-country BIPRU firm) Chapters 4 to 10, 12, 18, 19C, 19F.2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 IFPRU investment firm (including an overseas firm that would have been an IFPRU investment firm if it had been a UK domestic firm) Chapters 4 to 10, 12, 18, 19A, 19F.2, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28

FCA 2018/XX
1 Annex
Detailed application of SYSC
…
Part 2 Application of the common platform requirements
…
2.3 R For a sole trader:
(1) SYSC 4.3 and 4.4 do does not apply as long as he does they do not employ any person who is required to be approved under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements); (2) … …
Part 3 Tables summarising the application of the common platform requirements to
different types of firm
…
Table A: Application of the common platform requirements in SYSC 4 to SYSC 10
Provision
SYSC 4
COLUMN A
…
COLUMN A+
…
COLUMN A++
…
COLUMN B
…
… … … … …
SYSC
4.4.1AR
… … … Rule applies this section only to:
(1) an authorised professional firm in respect of its nonmainstream regulated activities unless the firm is also conducting other regulated activities and has appointed approved persons to perform the governing functions with equivalent responsibilities for the firm's non-mainstream regulated

FCA 2018/XX activities and other regulated activities; (2) activities carried on by a firm whose principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities and which is:
(a) an oil market participant;
(b) a service company;
(c) an energy market participant;
(d) a wholly-owned subsidiary of:
(i) a local authority;
(ii) a registered social landlord;
(e) a firm with permission to carry on insurance distribution activity in relation to non-investment insurance contracts but no other regulated activity except advising on P2P agreements; (2A) a credit firm which holds a limited permission (other than a not-for-profit debt advice body) with respect to the relevant credit activity (as defined in paragraph 2G of Schedule 6 to the Act) for which it has limited permission; (3) an incoming Treaty firm, an incoming EEA firm and a UCITS qualifier, (but only SYSC 4.4.5R(2) applies for these firms); and (4) a sole trader, but only if he employs any person who is required to be approved under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements).

FCA 2018/XX
As specified in SYSC
4.4.1AR.
… … … … …
…
4 General organisational requirements
…
4.4 Apportionment of responsibilities
Application
4.4.1A R (-2) This section applies to:
(a) a limited scope SMCR firm; and
(b) an authorised professional firm that is a core SMCR firm. (-1) The application of this section is further limited by the rest of this rule. (1) This section applies to an authorised professional firm as follows:
(a) it only applies in respect of its non-mainstream regulated activities; and (b) unless it does not apply if the firm:
(i) is also conducting other regulated activities; and (ii) has appointed approved persons to perform the FCA governing functions with equivalent responsibilities for the firm’s non-mainstream regulated activities and other regulated activities; . (2) activities carried on by a firm whose principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities and which is:
(a) an oil market participant; or
(b) a service company; or
(c) an energy market participant; or
(d) a wholly-owned subsidiary of:
(i) a local authority; or

FCA 2018/XX
(ii) a registered social landlord; or
(e) a firm with permission to carry on insurance distribution activity in relation to non-investment insurance contracts but no other regulated activity (except advising on P2P agreements); [deleted] (3) a credit firm which holds only a limited permission (other than a notfor-profit debt advice body) with respect to the relevant credit activity (as defined in paragraph 2G of Schedule 6 to the Act) for which it has limited permission; [deleted] (4) Only SYSC 4.4.5R(2) applies to an incoming Treaty firm, or an incoming EEA firm. or a UCITS qualifier (but only SYSC 4.4.5R(2) applies for these firms); and (5) This section only applies to a sole trader, but only if they:
(a) he employs have any person who is required to be approved under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements); or (b) are an authorised approved person employer; or (c) have any certification employees. …
4.4.6 G Frequently asked questions about allocation of functions in SYSC 4.4.5R
Question Answer
1 Does an individual to whom a function is allocated under SYSC 4.4.5R need to be an approved person or a certification employee? An individual to whom a function is allocated under SYSC 4.4.5R Yes. They will be performing the apportionment and oversight limited scope function (CF 8, see SUP 10A.7.1R) and an application must be made under section 59 of the Act for approval of the individual before the function is performed. There are exceptions from this in SUP 10A.1 (Approved persons - Application). However, the limited scope function does not apply to an EEA SMCR firm or an authorised professional firm that is a core SMCR firm. The apportionment and oversight function does not apply to a relevant authorised person. However, a person performing the role in SYSC 4.4.5R will

FCA 2018/XX fall into the certification regime in SYSC
5.2 (Certification Regime), unless the
person performing it is an approved person. A person performing the role in SYSC 4.4.5R may be an approved person because of another role that they perform (such as being an executive director). … … … 3 What is meant by “appropriately allocate” in this context? The allocation of functions should be compatible with delivering compliance with Principle 3, SYSC 4.4.3R and SYSC 4.1.1R. The appropriate regulator FCA considers that allocation to one or two individuals is likely to be appropriate for most firms. … … … 7 If a firm has an individual as chief executive, must the functions be allocated to that individual? … If the firm chooses to allocate the functions to a director or senior manager responsible for the overall management of a relevant group division, the FSA FCA would expect that individual to be of a seniority equivalent to or greater than a chief executive of the firm for the allocation to be appropriate. See also Question 14. … … … 11 How does the requirement to allocate the functions in SYSC 4.4.5R apply to an overseas firm which is not an incoming EEA firm, incoming Treaty firm or UCITS qualifier? The firm must appropriately allocate those functions to one or more individuals, in accordance with SYSC 4.4.5R, but:
…
The apportionment and oversight function applies to such a firm, unless it falls within a particular exception from the approved persons regime (see Question 1). 12 How does the requirement to allocate the functions in SYSC 4.4.5R apply to an SYSC 1 Annex 1.1.1R(2) and SYSC 1
Annex 1.1.8R restrict the application of
SYSC 4.4.5R for such a firm.
Accordingly:

FCA 2018/XX incoming EEA firm or incoming Treaty firm?
…
(2) Such a firm is required to allocate the function of oversight in SYSC 4.4.5R(2). However, the systems and controls that must be overseen are those relating to matters which the appropriate regulator FCA, as Host State regulator, is entitled to regulate (there is guidance on this in SUP 13A Annex 2). Those are primarily, but not exclusively, the systems and controls relating to the conduct of the firm’s activities carried on from its UK branch. … 13 What about a firm that is a partnership or a limited liability partnership? The appropriate regulator FCA envisages that most if not all partners or members will be either directors or senior managers, but this will depend on the constitution of the partnership (particularly in the case of a limited partnership) or limited liability partnership. A partnership or limited liability partnership may also have a chief executive (see Question 5). A limited liability partnership is a body corporate and, if a member of a group, will fall within SYSC 4.4.5R, row (1) or (2). … … … 6 Compliance, internal audit and financial crime …
6.2 Internal audit
…
6.2.2 G …
(2) For a firm that is not an SMCR firm, the internal audit function is not a controlled function itself, but is part of the systems and controls function (CF28). [deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
(3) For an SMCR firm that is a PRA-authorised person, the internal audit function is a PRA controlled function (SMF5). For an enhanced scope SMCR firm it is an FCA controlled function (SMF5). … 7 Risk control
7.1 Risk control
…
7.1.8 G …
(3) For a firm that is not an SMCR firm, the risk management function is not a controlled function itself, but is part of the systems and controls function (CF28). [deleted] (4) For an SMCR firm that is a PRA authorised person, the risk management function is a PRA controlled function (SMF4). For an enhanced scope SMCR firm it is an FCA controlled function. … 21 Risk control: additional guidance
21.1 Risk control: guidance on governance arrangements
…
Chief Risk Officer
21.1.2 G …
(2) Firms will need to seek the appropriate regulator's FCA’s or PRA’s (as appropriate) approval for a Chief Risk Officer to perform:
(a) (for an SMCR firm that is a PRA-authorised person) the PRA’s Chief Risk Function controlled function; or (b) (for any other firm an enhanced scope SMCR firm) the systems and controls function (see SUP 10A (FCA approved persons)) chief risk officer function. … 22 Regulatory references
22.1 Application
General application

FCA 2018/XX
22.1.1 R This chapter applies to all SMCR firms (subject to SYSC 22.1.5R).
22.1.1A G (1) Despite SYSC 22.1.1R, this chapter distinguishes between SMCR firms and other firms to which this chapter applies. The reason for this is SYSC 22.8.4R, which imposes some requirements on SMCR firms in relation to appointed representatives but fewer than it applies to SMCR firms themselves. (2) Therefore when this chapter refers to a person to which the requirements of this chapter apply as an employer (current, past or future) but who is not an SMCR firm, it is referring to an appointed representative. However it refers to an appointed representative on the basis that the requirements of this chapter only apply to it indirectly, through the SMCR firm that is its principal. … Territorial scope and overseas firms
22.1.3 R There is no territorial limitation on the application of this chapter, subject to
SYSC 22.1.5R and SYSC 22.1.6R.
…
22.1.5 R This chapter does not apply to: [deleted]
(1) an overseas firm that does not have an establishment in the United Kingdom; or (2) a UCITS qualifier (see section 266 of the Act (Disapplication of rules)); (3) an AIFM qualifier; or (4) incoming EEA firm that is an EEA pure reinsurer. …
22.2 Getting, giving and updating references: the main rules
Obligation to obtain references (applicable to SMCR firms)
22.2.1 R (1) If an SMCR firm (A) is considering:
(a) permitting or appointing someone (P) to perform a controlled function; or (b) issuing a certificate under the certification regime for P; or (ba) appointing a board director; …

FCA 2018/XX
…
22.2.7 R …
Sole traders
22.2.8 R The obligation in SYSC 22.2.1R (Obligation to obtain references (SMCR
firms only)) does not apply if A and P (as referred to in that rule) are the same person.
22.2.9 G An example of SYSC 22.2.8R is this. Say that P works at a firm (B) and
leaves to become a firm and a sole trader. P appoints themselves to perform the compliance oversight function. P does not need to get a regulatory reference from B about themselves.
22.2.10 G (1) If a firm is appointing someone who was a sole trader to a position
that would normally require a regulatory reference under SYSC 22.2.1R, it does not have to request a reference from the sole trader themselves. That is because SYSC 22.2.1R only requires a firm to request a reference from a previous employer and a sole trader is not their own employer. (2) An example of (1) is this. Say that P was a firm and a sole trader and performed the compliance oversight function themselves. P goes to work for another firm (A). A does not need to request a regulatory reference from P about P. …
22.5 Giving references: additional rules and guidance for all firms
…
22.2.3 R Table: What positions need a reference
Position When to obtain reference Comments … (C) … … … (D) Appointing someone to be a non-SMF board director subject to competence requirements. Before appointment Only applies to a UK SMCR firm that is:
(a) a core SMCR firm; or
(b) an enhanced scope
SMCR firm.
…

FCA 2018/XX
…
… Criminal record checks
22.5.19 G A firm giving a reference need not include information from a criminal
records check it has carried out under Part V of the Police Act 1997 (Certificates of Criminal Records, &c). The recruiting firm should carry out a criminal records check itself if necessary. The main FCA Handbook requirements on a recruiting firm to carry out a criminal records check are:
(1) SUP 10C.10.16R requires (an SMCR firm to should carry out such a check when appointing an SMF manager); and (2) SYSC 23.4 (Criminal record checks for certain directors). …
22.8 Additional rules and guidance for all firms
…
Appointed representatives
…
22.8.4A R (1) The approved person’s authorised approved person employer is responsible for compliance with SYSC 22.8.3R in the case of a requirement to give a reference about an approved person whose approval is under SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR (Appointed representatives) SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives). …
22.8.5 G One effect of SYSC 22.8.3R is that when an appointed representative
appoints an approved person under SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representatives of an SMCR firm) SUP 10A there is no requirement for the appointed representative or its principal to request a reference. 22.8.5A G This chapter does not apply in relation to an appointed representative of a firm that is not an SMCR firm. … 22 Annex 1R Template for regulatory references given by SMCR firms and disclosure requirements …

FCA 2018/XX
[Editor’s note: The underlining in the heading of each question in the remaining portion of Part One of SYSC 22 Annex 1R is in the existing Handbook text and does not indicate new text.] Question B:
Has the individual performed one or more of the following roles in relation to our firm:
(1) notified non-executive director;
(2) credit union non-executive director; or (3) key function holder (other than a controlled function); or (4) board director. …
Section One: Meaning of certain terms and phrases
Defined term or phrase Meaning
…
Certification function, approved person, controlled function and PRA controlled function … Board director Non-SMF board director subject to competence requirements, as defined in the Glossary. … … 22 Annex Factors to take into account when asking for and giving regulatory references Matters to take into account Comments … (C) Section 5 of the relevant Form A in SUP 10A Annex 4 (Application to perform controlled functions under approved persons

FCA 2018/XX regime) or SUP 10C Annex 3 (Application to perform senior management functions) … … 23 Senior managers and certification regime: Introduction and classification
23.1 Purpose
23.1.1 G The purpose of this chapter is to:
(1) explain what the senior managers and certification regime is and where to find the main Handbook provisions; (2) define which firms the regime applies to; and (3) define the different kinds of SMCR firm; and (4) require certain firms to carry out criminal record checks before appointing certain board directors.
23.2 Definitions and types of firms
23.2.1 R …
23.2.2 G Broadly speaking, firms covered by the senior managers and certification
regime that are dual-regulated by the FCA and the PRA are divided into two categories:
(1) Banks and deposit-takers. They are called SMCR banking firms. (2) Insurers.
23.2.3 G Broadly speaking, firms covered by the senior managers and certification
regime that are regulated by the FCA are divided into three categories:
(1) Firms regulated by the FCA that do not fall into (2) or (3). They are called core SMCR firms. A large number of firms will be in this category. (2) Certain large firms. These are called enhanced scope SMCR firms. Relatively few firms fall into this category. (3) Firms whose business is limited to certain types. These are called limited scope SMCR firms. A large number of firms will be in this category. The main examples are:

FCA 2018/XX
(a) limited permission consumer credit firms; (b) an authorised professional firm whose only regulated activities are non-mainstream regulated activities; (c) internally managed AIFs; and (d) firms whose main business is not regulated and whose regulated business is (with limited exceptions) restricted to insurance distribution activity in relation to non-investment insurance contracts.
23.3 Overview of the senior managers and certification regime
…
23.3.2 G The table in SYSC 23.3.3G gives more details about each of those three
elements. The first two columns of the table apply to all firms. The third column only covers firms that are not regulated by the PRA.
23.3.3 G Table: Summary of the senior managers and certification regime
(1)
Description of component of the regime
(2)
Handbook provisions
(3)
Application to solo-regulated firms
The senior managers regime: Parts that apply to all firms Pre-approval by the FCA of senior management (the FCA Handbook calls senior management subject to pre-approval SMF managers) SUP 10C Applies to all solo-regulated firms Firm to be satisfied that a person is fit and proper before applying for them to be approved as an SMF manager by the FCA or PRA This requirement comes from
section 60A of
the Act. There is guidance on it in SUP
10C.10.14G
(Vetting of candidates by the firm)
Applies to all solo-regulated firms

FCA 2018/XX
Annual assessment of fitness and propriety by the SMF managers’ firms This requirement comes from
section 63(2A)
of the Act.
There are related notification obligations in SUP 10C.14.18R to SUP 10C.14.25G (Notifications about fitness, disciplinary action and breaches of COCON). Applies to all solo-regulated firms A firm should carry out criminal records checks before applying for someone to be approved as an SMF manager SUP 10C.10.16R (Criminal records checks and verifying fitness and properness) Applies to all solo-regulated firms except for a sole trader without employees A firm should ask for a regulatory reference before appointing someone to be an SMF manager, or to certain other senior management positions, and give one if asked to by another firm doing so SYSC 22 (Regulatory references) Obligation to give a reference applies to all solo-regulated firms. Obligation to ask for one applies to all solo-regulated firms except for a sole trader without employees. Statements of responsibilities This is a document that sets out the responsibilities that an SMF manager performs as part of their designated senior management function. It is prepared as part of the firm’s application to the FCA or (if the firm is a PRA-authorised person) PRA for SUP 10C.11 (Statements of responsibilities). Many of the requirements are in the Act itself but they Applies to all solo-regulated firms

FCA 2018/XX them to be approved as an SMF manager. It should be updated after approval when there has been any significant change in the responsibilities of the SMF manager are summarised in SUP 10C.11. SUP 10C.11 also adds some further requirements, particularly about there being one statement of responsibilities per SMF manager per firm. The senior managers regime: Parts that apply to many firms A firm should allocate certain specified management responsibilities among its SMF managers The FCA Handbook calls them FCAprescribed senior management responsibilities SYSC 24 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Allocation of prescribed responsibilities) Does not apply to a limited scope SMCR firm. Applies to a core SMCR firm and an enhanced scope SMCR firm. A firm solo-regulated by the FCA should carry out criminal records checks before appointing a board director who is not an SMF manager SYSC 23.4 (Criminal record checks for nonexecutive directors) Does not apply to a limited scope SMCR firm. Applies to a core SMCR firm and an enhanced scope SMCR firm. The senior managers regime: Parts that only apply to a limited range of firms A firm should maintain a comprehensive and up-to-date document (called the management responsibilities map) that describes its management and governance arrangements SYSC 25 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Management responsibilities maps and handover procedures and material) Does not apply to a limited scope SMCR firm or a core SMCR firm. Applies to an enhanced scope SMCR firm.

FCA 2018/XX
A firm should ensure that, at all times, one or more of its SMF managers have overall responsibility for each of the activities, business areas and functions of the firm SYSC 26 (Senior managers and certification regime: Overall and local responsibility) Does not apply to a limited scope SMCR firm or a core SMCR firm. Applies to an enhanced scope SMCR firm. A firm should ensure that a person becoming an SMF manager has all the information and material that they could reasonably expect to have to perform their responsibilities SYSC 25.9 (Handover procedures and material) Does not apply to a limited scope SMCR firm or a core SMCR firm. Applies to an enhanced scope SMCR firm. The senior managers regime: Parts outside the Handbook Criminal offence relating to a decision that causes a financial institution to fail. It applies to a UK SMCR banking firm but does not apply to a credit union. It does not apply to any firm that is not a UK SMCR banking firm. This is contained in
section 36 of the
Financial
Services
(Banking
Reform) Act
Does not apply to any soloregulated firm The certification regime A firm should not permit an employee to carry out certain functions (certification functions) unless it has issued them with a certificate. The certificate is only valid for a year. The firm will have to renew it if the employee is to carry on performing the function. A firm may not issue or renew a certificate unless it is satisfied that the person is fit and proper. Certification does not involve preapproval by the FCA or PRA. Most of the requirements of this regime are in sections 63E (Certification of employees by authorised persons) and 63F (Issuing of certificates) of the Act. SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Certification regime) describes the
Applies to all solo-regulated firms except for internally managed AIFs and certain firms that only carry out benchmark activities.

FCA 2018/XX regime and explains which employees are covered. A firm should ask for a regulatory reference before appointing someone to perform an FCA certification function (or a PRA equivalent) and give one if asked to by another firm doing so SYSC 22 (Regulatory references) Applies to all solo-regulated firms Conduct rules (applies to all firms) Rules of conduct that apply directly to a firm’s workforce other than ancillary staff COCON Applies to all solo-regulated firms A firm should report breaches of COCON to the FCA SUP 15.11 (Notification of COCON breaches and disciplinary action) Applies to all solo-regulated firms A firm should:
(a) ensure that all persons subject to
COCON are notified of the rules that apply to them; and (b) take all reasonable steps to ensure that they understand how COCON applies to them These obligations are in section 64B of the Act (Rules of conduct:
responsibilities of authorised persons).
There is guidance in
COCON 2.3
(Firms: Training and breaches).
Applies to all solo-regulated firms
23.3.4 G …
23.4 Criminal record checks for certain directors
23.4.1 R This section applies to a UK SMCR firm that is:
(1) an enhanced scope SMCR firm; or

FCA 2018/XX
(2) a core SMCR firm.
23.4.2 R A firm must (as part of its assessment of the fitness and propriety of any of
its non-SMF board directors subject to competence requirements (P)) obtain the fullest information that it is lawfully able to obtain about P under Part V of the Police Act 1997 (Certificates of Criminal Records, &c) and related subordinated legislation of the UK or any part of the UK before P’s appointment as a board director.
23.4.3 G The guidance in SUP 10C.10.17G, SUP 10C.10.18G and SUP 10C.10.21G
about criminal record checks for candidates to be an SMF manager applies to criminal record checks under this section. 23 Annex Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR firms
Part One: Flow diagram and other basic provisions
1.1 R …
1.2 R Flow diagram: Types of SMCR firm
Delete the flow diagram in SYSC 23 Annex 1 1.2R and replace it with the following. The deleted text is not shown. Are you an exempt firm (see
Part 2 of this Annex)?
You are not an SMCR firm
Yes
No
Are you a firm? You are not an SMCR firm No Yes

FCA 2018/XX
Are you an SMCR banking firm?
You are an SMCR firm.
You are not a core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope SMCR firm or a limited scope SMCR firm. Yes Are you in the insurance sector as defined in Part 4 of this Annex? You are an SMCR firm. You are not a core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope SMCR firm or a limited scope SMCR firm. Yes Do you meet the requirements for being a limited scope firm as defined in Part 4 of this Annex? You are an SMCR firm and a limited scope SMCR firm Yes No You are an SMCR firm and an enhanced scope SMCR firm Have you elected to be a core SMCR firm or an enhanced scope SMCR firm in accordance with this
Annex?
No
Yes
You are an SMCR firm. You are either a core SMCR firm or an enhanced scope SMCR firm, depending on your election. Have you elected to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm? Yes

FCA 2018/XX
Note: The categorisation in this flow diagram is subject to SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.1R. This note forms part of the flow diagram. … Amend the following as shown.
Part Two: Changing category
2.1 R If a firm is subject to a requirement that it must comply with the rules in
the FCA Handbook applicable to one of the categories of SMCR firm set Do you meet one of the qualification conditions for the enhanced requirements in accordance with Parts 6 to 9 of this Annex (other than electing to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm)? You are an SMCR firm and an Yes enhanced scope SMCR firm You are an SMCR firm and a core SMCR firm No Are you excluded from the enhanced regime as defined in Part 6 of this
Annex?
Yes
No
You are an
SMCR firm and a core
SMCR firm
No

FCA 2018/XX out in this Annex, it is to be treated as falling into that category of SMCR firm for all purposes.
2.2 G (1) The FCA may, on a case-by-case basis, require a limited scope
SMCR firm or a core SMCR firm to comply with the requirements that apply to an enhanced scope SMCR firm if the FCA considers it appropriate to do so to advance one or more of its operational objectives under the Act. (2) The most common example of a requirement described in SYSC 23
Annex 1 2.1R is likely to be one of the kind described in (1).
(3) One effect of SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.1R is that if a firm is moved from the limited scope SMCR firm or core SMCR firm category to the enhanced scope SMCR firm category, the FCA-designated senior management functions that will apply to it are the ones for enhanced scope SMCR firms.
2.3 (1) In practice it is unlikely that the procedure described in SYSC 23
Annex 1 2.1R will be used to move a firm from a category
applicable to PRA-authorised persons to one applicable to FCAauthorised persons or vice versa. (2) This is because the FCA’s regime for PRA-authorised persons is designed on the basis that the PRA’s regime also applies to those firms while the regime for FCA-authorised persons is designed on the basis that no PRA requirements apply.
2.4 G (1) Where a firm becomes or stops being an enhanced scope SMCR
firm under the procedure described in SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.1R, the material in Parts 9 and 10 of this Annex about when the change of status becomes effective will not apply. Instead the timing will be dealt with in the variation of permission. (2) If the variation does not specify the timing of the change, the change is likely to take effect when the variation does.
2.5 R (1) This rule deals with a notification under:
(a) SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.11R (opting to become a core SMCR firm); (b) SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.12R (opting to stop being a core SMCR firm); (c) SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3) (opting to become an enhanced scope SMCR firm); and (d) SYSC 23 Annex 1 10.4R (opting to stop being an enhanced scope SMCR firm).

FCA 2018/XX
(2) The notification takes effect in accordance with the applicable Part of this Annex. The notice may not specify when it is to take effect. (3) The notification must be made in accordance with SUP 10C.15.11R (Method of submission: electronic submission). (4) A firm must use the version of the form made available for this purpose on the electronic system referred to in SUP 10C.15.11R, which is based on the version found in SYSC 23 Annex 2R (Form O). (5) If SUP 10C.15.11R requires the notification to be in accordance with SUP 10C.15.14R (Method of submission: other forms of submission), the firm must use the version of the form found in SYSC 23 Annex 2R. (6) A firm may, by notice to the FCA, withdraw a notice in (1) at any time before the firm becomes or, as the case may be, ceases to be, an enhanced scope SMCR firm or, as the case may be, a core SMCR firm.
2.6 R (1) The following may also give a notice described in SYSC 23 Annex
1 2.5R(1)(a) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R(1)(c):
(a) an applicant for Part 4A permission; and (b) other persons seeking to carry on regulated activities as an SMCR firm. (2) The notice becomes effective when it becomes an SMCR firm. (3) SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R(3) to (6) apply to a notice in (1).
2.7 D If a person in SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.6R(1) wishes to rely on SYSC 23
Annex 1 2.6R, it must make, or, as the case may be, amend its
application so as to meet the relevant requirements of this Annex about the notices described in SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.6R(1).
2.8 G (1) This paragraph relates to the withdrawal of a notice in SYSC 23
Annex 1 2.5R(1) as described in SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R(6).
(2) If a firm decides to give a withdrawal notice, it should send it to the FCA as soon as possible. (3) A firm should give a withdrawal notice in accordance with SUP
15.7 (Form and method of notification). There is no specified form
for the notice.
2.9 G (1) This paragraph relates to SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.6R.
(2) This Annex restricts who can elect to opt up to a higher category of SMCR firm. In a case covered by this paragraph, this restriction

FCA 2018/XX relates to the category of SMCR firm of which the person would be a member when it becomes an SMCR firm if it had not made the election. (3) (2) also applies to the requirements about how to notify the FCA.
2.10 G (1) A firm may elect to opt up to a higher category of SMCR firm (see
SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R(1)(a) and (c)) and then later meet one of the other qualification conditions for that higher category. (2) The table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.11G gives examples of various scenarios that can follow on from that.
2.11 G Table: Examples involving a firm that opts up a category (this table
belongs to SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.10G)
Scenario Treatment under this Annex
(1) A firm elects to opt up to a higher category. It later meets one of the other qualification conditions for that higher category. It ceases to meet that second qualification condition some time later. The firm remains in the higher category because its election remains in force. (2) A firm elects to opt up to a higher category. It later meets one of the other qualification conditions for that higher category. It later cancels its election. The firm remains within that higher category despite cancelling its election because it still meets that second qualification condition. (3) A firm elects to opt up to a higher category. It later cancels its election. During the one year period in Part Five or Part Ten of this Annex following its cancellation notice it meets one of the other qualification conditions for that higher category. The firm remains within that higher category despite the cancellation notice. (4) A firm elects to opt up to a higher category. It later meets one of the other qualification conditions for that higher category. It later cancels its election. Some time after that, it ceases to meet the second qualification condition. The cancellation notice has no immediate effect (see Example (2)). However when it ceases to meet the second qualification condition it ceases to be in the higher category. In contrast to Example (1), its election is no longer in force when ceases to meet the second qualification condition.

FCA 2018/XX
Note: When this table refers to the cancellation of an election it refers to cancelling that election under this Annex after it has taken effect and not to withdrawing it before it takes effect.
Part Three: Definition of exempt firm
…
3.3 R …
3.4 R A UCITS qualifier is an exempt firm (see section 266 of the Act
(Disapplication of rules)).
3.5 R An AIFM qualifier is an exempt firm.
Insert the following new Parts in SYSC 23 Annex 1 where indicated. The text is not underlined.
Part Four: Definition of insurance sector
…
4.2 R …
Part Five: Definition of limited scope SMCR firm
5.1 R (1) This Part sets out the requirements for being a limited scope SMCR
firm referred to in the flow diagram in Part One of this Annex. (2) Where this Part says that a firm is a limited scope SMCR firm, that means that the firm meets those requirements. (3) This Part also sets out a procedure for a firm that would otherwise have been a limited scope SMCR firm to elect to be a core SMCR firm and to reverse that election.
5.2 G A firm that would otherwise have been a limited scope SMCR firm may
elect to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm and may reverse that election. Parts Eight and Ten of this Annex deal with this.
5.3 R A firm listed in the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.4R is a limited scope
SMCR firm if:

FCA 2018/XX
(1) its principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities; and (2) it is not a MiFID investment firm.
5.4 R Table: List of limited scope SMCR firms referred to in SYSC 23 Annex 1
5.3R
(1) Oil market participant
(2) Service company
(3) Energy market participant
(4) A wholly owned subsidiary of:
(a) a local authority; or
(b) a registered social landlord.
(5) A firm that meets the following conditions:
(a) it has permission to carry on insurance distribution activity in relation to non-investment insurance contracts; and (b) it either:
(i) does not have permission to carry on any other regulated activity; or (ii) has permission to carry on no other regulated activity except advising on P2P agreements.
5.5 G It will be a matter of fact in each case whether, having regard to all the
circumstances, including in particular where the balance of the business lies, a firm’s principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities. If a firm wishes to rely on SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.3R, it should be in a position to demonstrate that its principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities.
5.6 R A sole trader is a limited scope SMCR firm.
5.7 R A firm whose permission is limited to the carrying on of a relevant credit
activity (as defined in paragraph 2G of Schedule 6 to the Act) (a limited permission) is a limited scope SMCR firm.
5.8 R A not-for-profit debt advice body is a limited scope SMCR firm.

FCA 2018/XX
5.9 R An authorised professional firm whose only regulated activities are nonmainstream regulated activities is a limited scope SMCR firm.
5.10 R A firm is a limited scope SMCR firm if it meets the following conditions:
(1) it is an internally managed AIF;
(2) it is a body corporate; and
(3) it is not a collective investment scheme.
5.11 R (1) A limited scope SMCR firm may notify the FCA in accordance with
this Part that it intends to become a core SMCR firm.
(2) A firm that gives notice under (1) must comply with the requirements for core SMCR firms (and becomes a core SMCR firm) from three months after the FCA receives the notice in (1). (3) SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R applies to a notice in (1).
5.12 R (1) This rule deals with a firm that has elected to become a core SMCR
firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.11R.
(2) The firm may notify the FCA that it intends to cancel its election to be a core SMCR firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.11R. (3) The notification takes effect one year after the FCA receives the notice. (4) SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R applies to notifications under this rule.
Part Six: Exclusion from enhanced regime
6.1 R This Part sets out which firms are excluded from the enhanced regime for
the purposes of the flow diagram in Part One of this Annex.
6.2 R An overseas SMCR firm is excluded from the enhanced regime.
6.3 R A firm is excluded from the enhanced regime if its permission only covers
being the full-scope UK AIFM of:
(1) an unauthorised AIF; or
(2) an authorised AIF only marketed to investors that are professional clients.
6.4 R A firm is excluded from the enhanced regime if:
(1) it is exempt from MiFID under article 2(1)(j); and (2) its only permission is bidding in emissions auctions.

FCA 2018/XX
Part Seven: Financial qualification condition for being an enhanced scope
SMCR firm
7.1 R A firm meets a qualification condition for the purposes of identifying an
enhanced scope SMCR firm under the flow diagram in Part One of this
Annex if it meets one of the criteria set out in column (1) of the table in
SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R.
7.2 R Table: Financial qualification conditions
(1)
Qualification condition
(2)
Reporting requirement
(3)
Comments
Part One: Point in time measurements
(1) The average amount of the firm’s assets under management (calculated as a three-year rolling average) is £50 billion or more Assets under management are calculated in accordance with the method that must be used to calculate the amount to be recorded in data element 1A (Total funds under management) in data item FSA038 (Volumes and Type of Business) SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(2) and SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.10R apply to this calculation. (2) The firm currently has 10,000 or more outstanding regulated mortgages A firm’s outstanding regulated mortgages are calculated as follows:
(a) calculate the amount that must be recorded in row E4.5 (Total) in the box under the successive headings and subheadings “Regulated Loans”, “Balances outstanding” and “Number” in the MLAR; (b) calculate the amount that must be recorded in row G1.1(d) (total) under the successive headings and sub-headings “As PRINCIPAL administrator” and

FCA 2018/XX
“Regulated loans” in the
MLAR; and
(c) add those amounts together.
Part Two: Revenue measurements
(3) The average amount of the firm’s total intermediary regulated business revenue (calculated as a three-year rolling average) is £35 million per annum or more Total intermediary regulated business revenue is calculated in accordance with the method that must be used to calculate the amount to be recorded in data element 4E (Total regulated business revenue) in
Section B (Profit and Loss
account) of the RMAR
SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(3) applies to this calculation.
(4) The average amount of the firm’s annual revenue generated by regulated consumer credit lending (calculated as a three-year rolling average) is £100 million or more Annual revenue generated by regulated consumer credit lending is calculated as follows:
SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(3) applies to this calculation.
(a) calculate each amount that must be recorded in column B (Revenue) for the rows headed “Lending” in data item CCR002 (Consumer Credit data: Volumes); and (b) add those amounts together. Note 1: Where Parts 7 to 10 of SYSC 23 Annex 1 refer to a calculation period they refer to the annual period in column (1) for the calculations in Part Two of this table. Note 2: Where Parts 7 to 10 of SYSC 23 Annex 1 refer to an averaging period they refer to the three year period in column (1). Note 3: Where Parts 7 to 10 of SYSC 23 Annex 1 refer to a reporting period they refer to the period for which reports in column (2) are prepared.
7.3 G (1) Column (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R refers to the FCA
Handbook versions of the relevant data items.

FCA 2018/XX
(2) The boxes referred to in row (2) (outstanding regulated mortgages) correspond to the online version of the MLAR as follows:
(a) paragraph (a) corresponds to data item c3; and (b) paragraph (b) corresponds to data item G1.1 c1 (d).
7.4 R If the applicable financial reporting requirements in column (2) of the
table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R have changed during the relevant period,
the calculations must be made in accordance with whatever requirements applied for the applicable period.
7.5 R The calculations are made on a solo basis.
7.6 R (1) The calculation periods, averaging periods and dates in column (1)
of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R are defined so as to be consistent with the financial reporting periods used for the corresponding data item in column (2) of that table. The rest of this rule gives examples of this principle. (2) If a calculation in column (1) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R is based on per annum or annual revenue and the reporting period in column (2) is based on the firm’s accounting period:
(a) the calculation periods in column (1) are also based on the firm’s accounting period; and (b) the averaging period in column (1) is made up of the applicable number of accounting periods. (3) If a calculation in column (1) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R is based on per annum or annual revenue and the reporting period in column (2) is based on a calendar year:
(a) the calculation periods in column (1) are also based on a calendar year; and (b) the averaging period in column (1) is made up of the applicable number of calendar years. (4) Where row (2) of column (1) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R refers to a firm’s current financial figures it refers to the figures for its most recent reporting period in column (2). (5) A firm’s most recent reporting period is the one for the data item whose required submission date has passed most recently.
7.7 R (1) This rule deals with the establishment of a firm’s averaging periods.
(2) When the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R specifies that this paragraph (2) applies:

FCA 2018/XX
(a) each averaging period ends on the last day of a reporting period; and (b) there is an averaging period that ends on each such day. (3) When the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R specifies that this paragraph (3) applies:
(a) each averaging period ends on the last day of a year; and (b) there is an averaging period that ends on each such day. (4) The term ‘year’ in (3) has the meaning in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.6R.
7.8 G (1) SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(2) provides for a firm’s status to be tested
every six months if the relevant data item is reported in six-month intervals and to be tested yearly if the relevant data item is reported yearly. (2) SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.7R(3) provides for a firm’s status to be tested once a year even if the relevant data item is reported in six-month intervals.
7.9 R (1) This rule applies to calculations in Part Two of the table in SYSC 23
Annex 1 7.2R.
(2) If:
(a) the firm reports the relevant data items more than once a year; and (b) each successive report covers the whole year to date; the calculations in the table are only based on the data item that covers the full year. (3) The term year in (2) has the meaning in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.6R.
7.10 R When the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R specifies that this rule applies,
the calculation of the average involves calculating the relevant amount for each reporting period relating to the averaging period, summing those amounts and dividing the result by the applicable number of reporting periods.
7.11 R (1) This rule applies where:
(a) the calculation is under Part Two of the table in SYSC 23
Annex 1 7.2R;
(b) the reporting period in column (2) is based on the firm’s accounting period;

FCA 2018/XX
(c) any of the firm’s accounting periods in the applicable averaging period is not twelve months; and (d) as a result the averaging period would not be a whole number of calendar years. (2) Where this rule applies, the firm must adjust the minimum qualification amount in column (1) proportionately.
7.12 G The main example of when SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.11R may apply is where a
firm changes its accounting reference date.
7.13 G (1) The financial reporting period may be shorter than the
corresponding calculation period.
(2) For example, the calculation period may be based on annual revenue but the firm may have to prepare the corresponding data item in column (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R for revenue arising in six-month periods. (3) If SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.9R applies this does not matter as the calculation is based on the figures for the full year. (4) If SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.9R does not apply, in the example in (2):
(a) the calculation of the firm’s most recent annual revenue in column (1) is based on the most recently ended six-month period and the six-month period before that; and (b) each year within the three year average is based on two sixmonth periods.
7.14 R A qualification condition in column (1) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1
7.2R does not apply to a firm if the corresponding reporting requirement referred to in column (2) of the table does not currently apply to the firm.
7.15 R Subject to SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.14R, if the reporting requirement referred
to in column (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R did not apply to the firm for the whole of its most recent averaging period as defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R, the averaging period is shortened to cover the period for which those requirements did apply.
7.16 G Reasons why SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R may apply to a firm include the
following:
(1) the firm has only recently been authorised; (2) the firm’s Part 4A permission has only recently been varied to include the relevant regulated activities; or

FCA 2018/XX
(3) the firm has only recently become subject to the relevant reporting requirements.
7.17 G (1) This paragraph gives an example of how SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R
works.
(2) In this example:
(a) the relevant qualification condition is one of those in Part Two of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R; (b) the reporting requirement is based on a firm’s accounting year and reports are due every six months; (c) the firm’s accounting year ends on 31st December; (d) the firm is authorised or the relevant regulated activities are included in its permission in February (referred to in this paragraph as the date on which it is authorised). (2) The firm will not meet the qualification condition before the end of the accounting year in which the firm is authorised, however large its business is in the period from February to June. This is because the calculations are based on calculation periods of a year and the firm will not have data for the year. (3) Following the end of accounting year in which it is authorised, the assessment of whether the firm meets the qualification condition is based on the figures for the accounting year in which it is authorised. There is no adjustment to take account of the fact that the firm was only authorised part of the way through that period. (4) After the end of the second accounting year, the averaging period is two years. (5) After the end of the third accounting year there is no further need for SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.15R.
Part Eight: Other qualification conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR
firm
8.1 R A firm meets a qualification condition for the purposes of identifying an
enhanced scope SMCR firm under the flow diagram in Part One of this
Annex if it meets one of the following criteria:
(1) the firm is a significant IFPRU firm; (2) the firm is a CASS large firm; or (3) the firm notifies the FCA in accordance with this Part that it intends to become an enhanced scope SMCR firm.

FCA 2018/XX
8.2 R (1) This rule deals with a notification under SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3).
(2) The notification may (subject to SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.6R) only be given by:
(a) a limited scope SMCR firm;
(b) a core SMCR firm; or
(c) an enhanced scope SMCR firm that is within the one year period in Part Ten of this Annex (When a firm stops being an enhanced scope SMCR firm). (3) SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R applies to notifications under this rule.
8.3 G If a firm is subject to a requirement that it must comply with the rules in
the FCA Handbook applicable to one of the categories of firm in SYSC 23
Annex 1 8.1R(1) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(2) it is to be treated as falling
into that category of firm for the purpose of this Annex as well.
Part Nine: When a firm becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm
General rule
9.1 R (1) A firm must comply with the requirements for enhanced scope
SMCR firms (and becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm) from the date specified in this rule. (2) If a firm:
(a) was not an enhanced scope SMCR firm; and (b) then meets one of the qualification conditions in Part 7 or
Part 8 of this Annex;
the date is twelve months after it first meets the first qualification condition that it met. (3) Where the first qualification condition it meets is the one in SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3), the date is three months after the FCA receives the notice in SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3). (4) (3) also applies if:
(a) it meets the qualification condition in SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3) after it meets another qualification condition; and (b) the result of applying (3) would be that the firm would become an enhanced scope SMCR firm sooner. Meeting the financial thresholds in Part 7

FCA 2018/XX
9.2 R (1) A firm meets one of the qualification conditions in Part 7 of this
Annex (financial qualification conditions) on the due date for
submission of the relevant data item (see (2) and (3) for the meaning of relevant data item). (2) Except where (3) applies, the relevant data item is the data item for the final financial reporting period applicable to the averaging period for which the firm first meets that qualification condition. (3) Where the qualification condition is the one in row (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R, the relevant data item is the one for the reporting period for which the firm first meets that qualification condition. Meeting the qualification conditions in Part 8
9.3 R A firm meets one of the qualification conditions in Part 8 of this annex
(other qualification conditions) on the date when:
(1) the status in SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(1) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(2) becomes effective; or (as the case may be) (2) the FCA receives the notice in SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3).
9.4 G SYSC 23 Annex 1 9.1R and SYSC 23 Annex 1 9.3R mean that a firm
becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm under Part 8 of this Annex on the date in column (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 9.5G.
9.5 G Table: Date firm becomes an enhanced scope firm
Qualification condition Date firm becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm The firm is a significant IFPRU firm It becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm one year and three months after the date in IFPRU 1.2.3R (the three-month period in IFPRU 1.2.6R(2) plus the one year in this Part). The firm is a CASS large firm This includes a firm that has elected to be treated as a CASS large firm If the firm notifies the FCA in accordance with CASS 1A.2.9R(1) or CASS 1A.2.9R(2), it becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm one year following the 1 February following the notification under CASS. If the firm notifies the FCA in accordance with CASS 1A.2.9R(3), it becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm one year after the day it begins to hold client money or safe custody assets.

FCA 2018/XX
If the firm makes an election under CASS 1A.2.5R(1), it becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm one year after the day the notification made under CASS 1A.2.5R(2)(a) states that the election is intended to take effect. The firm opts to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm by notifying the FCA using Form O It becomes an enhanced scope SMCR firm three months after the FCA receives the notice
9.6 G (1) The purpose of the one year or three-month period between meeting
the conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm and the firm becoming subject to the requirements for such firms is to allow it to make preparations to comply with the new requirements. (2) For example, a core SMCR firm opting up to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm should use this period to apply for approval for its personnel to perform the new designated senior management functions that will apply because it has become an enhanced scope SMCR firm.
9.7 G (1) A firm retains its old status during the one year or three-month
period described in this Part.
(2) For example, a core SMCR firm that meets one of the qualification conditions for being an enhanced scope SMCR firm in SYSC 23
Annex 1 8.1R(1) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(2) will remain as a core
SMCR firm for one year after it meets the qualification condition.
Part Ten: When a firm stops being an enhanced scope SMCR firm
General rule
10.1 R A firm that:
(1) was an enhanced scope SMCR firm; and (2) then meets none of the qualification conditions in this Annex; ceases to be subject to the requirements for enhanced scope SMCR firms (and ceases to an enhanced scope SMCR firm) one year after it ceases to meet the last qualification condition that it met. Ceasing to meet the financial thresholds in Part 7
10.2 R A firm ceases to meet one of the qualification conditions in Part 7 of this
Annex (financial qualification conditions) on whichever of the following
is applicable:

FCA 2018/XX
(1) the due date for submission of the data item for the final financial reporting period applicable to the averaging period for which the firm first ceases to meet that qualification condition; or (2) (where the qualification condition is the one in row (2) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.2R) the due date for submission of the data item for the reporting period for which the firm first ceases to meet that qualification condition; or (3) the date the relevant reporting requirement ceases to apply as referred to in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.14R. Ceasing to meet the qualification conditions in Part 8
10.3 R A firm ceases to meet one of the qualification conditions in SYSC 23
Annex 1 8.1R(1) or SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(2) (other qualification
conditions) on the date that the status in SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R ceases to apply.
10.4 R (1) This rule deals with a firm that has elected to become an enhanced
scope SMCR firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3).
(2) A firm may notify the FCA that it intends to cancel its election to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm under SYSC 23 Annex 1 8.1R(3). (3) The firm ceases to meet the qualification condition under SYSC 23
Annex 1 8.1R(3) on the date the FCA receives the notice.
(4) SYSC 23 Annex 1 2.5R applies to notifications under this rule. Only meeting qualification conditions for a short time
10.5 G If the firm ceases to meet the relevant qualification condition while the
one-year period in Part 9 of this Annex is still running, the one-year period in this Part does not apply. Instead, the firm will simply not become an enhanced scope SMCR firm in the first place. Only ceasing to meet qualification conditions for a short time
10.6 R If:
(1) the one-year period in SYSC 23 Annex 1 10.1R is still running; and (2) the firm again meets a qualification condition in Part Seven or Eight of this Annex; then:
(3) the firm remains an enhanced scope SMCR firm; and

FCA 2018/XX
(4) the one-year or three-month period in Part 9 of this Annex does not apply. Insert the following annex in the appropriate position. The text (which consists of a form) is included in Part Two of Annex Q of this instrument. 23 Annex 2R Form O: Changing firm status under the Senior Managers and Certification Regime Amend the following as shown. 24 Senior managers and certification regime: Allocation of prescribed responsibilities
24.1 Application
Main application rules
24.1.1 R This chapter applies to an SMCR firm, except to the extent that this chapter
applies a narrower scope to a particular provision. However, this chapter does not apply to:
(1) an EEA SMCR firm; or
(2) a limited scope SMCR firm.
…
24.2 Allocation of FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities: Main
allocation rules
…
What the FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities are …
24.2.6 R Table: FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities
…

FCA 2018/XX
FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility Explanation Reference letter … (9) Responsibility for:
(a) safeguarding the independence of; and (b) oversight of the performance of; the internal audit function, in accordance with the internal audit requirements for SMCR firms. (1) This responsibility includes responsibility for:
(a) safeguarding the independence of; and (b) oversight of the performance of; a person approved to perform the Head of Internal Audit function for the firm if that function applies to the firm. … (j) (4) The Head of Internal Audit function means the PRA’s Head of Internal Audit designated senior management function or the head of internal audit function. … (11) Responsibility for:
(a) safeguarding the independence of; and (b) oversight of the performance of; the risk function, in accordance with the risk control requirements for SMCR firms. (1) This responsibility includes responsibility for:
(a) safeguarding the independence of; and (b) oversight of the performance of; a person approved to perform the Chief Risk function for the firm if that function applies to the firm. … (l)

FCA 2018/XX
(4) The Chief Risk function means the
PRA’s Chief Risk designated senior management function or the chief risk officer function. … (17) … … … (18) Responsibility for taking reasonable steps to ensure that every person involved in the performance of the firm’s internal audit function is independent from the persons who perform external audit, including:
This only applies if the firm outsources its internal audit function. (j-3) (a) supervision and management of the work of outsourced internal auditors; and (b) management of potential conflicts of interest between the provision of external audit and internal audit services. (19) Responsibility for:
(a) managing the firm’s internal stress tests; and (b) ensuring the accuracy and timeliness of information provided to the FCA and other regulatory bodies for the purposes of stress testing. Stress testing refers to stress testing under SYSC 20 (Reverse stress testing). This responsibility only applies to a firm to which SYSC 20 applies. (s) (20) The responsibilities allocated under COLL 6.6.27R or COLL Only applies to a firm to which the rules in column (1) apply. (za)

FCA 2018/XX
8.5.22R (Allocation of responsibility for compliance to an approved person). (21) Responsibility for the development and maintenance of the firm’s business model by the governing body. Business model means the same thing as it does in Schedule 6 to the Act (Threshold Conditions). This responsibility applies even if the business model threshold condition does not apply to it. (t) …
24.3 Who prescribed responsibilities should be allocated to
Seniority and authority
24.3.1 G The FCA expects that a person who has responsibility for an FCAprescribed senior management responsibility :
(1) will generally (in the case of the FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities in SYSC 24.3.3G SYSC 24.3.3G(1)) be the most senior employee or officer responsible for managing that area (or the most senior below the chief executive); and … Executive or non-executive …
24.3.3 G (1) The Subject to (2), the FCA expects that normally a firm will allocate
the other FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities to an SMF manager who performs executive functions for the firm. (2) The relevant rules in COLL deal with the persons to whom a firm should allocate FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility (za) (COLL value for money assessment and independent director requirements). Exceptions for small non-complex firms

FCA 2018/XX
24.3.4 G The FCA accepts that it may not be practical for a small non-complex firm
to comply with the parts of SYSC 24.3.1G(1), SYSC 24.3.2G and SYSC 24.3.3G SYSC 24.3.3G(1) that would otherwise apply to it. … Not assigning too many responsibilities to one person …
24.3.10 G …
(2) The firm should make the judgement:
…
(d) any other applicable Handbook requirements, including :
…
(ii) SYSC 24.3.7G to SYSC 24.3.9G; and
(iii) article 21 of the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1
Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1
Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R); and
…
…
…
Annex 1
Which FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities apply to which kind of firm Introduction and exclusions …
1.3 G …
1.4 R The following FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities do not
apply to a full-scope UK AIFM in relation to its managing an AIF:
(1) responsibility (j) (internal audit oversight); (2) responsibility (k) (compliance oversight); (3) responsibility (l) (risk oversight); (4) responsibility (j-3) (independence of outsourced internal audit); and

FCA 2018/XX
(5) responsibility (t) (business model); … Insert the following new Parts in SYSC 24 Annex 1 where indicated. The text is not underlined. Insurance sector firms …
3.3 R Table: FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility applying to
insurance sector firms
Brief description of responsibility
Reference letter of responsibility
Solvency
II firm
Third country branches
Other insurance sector
ISPV
… … … … … …
Solo regulated firms
4.1 R (1) The table in SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.2R sets out which FCA-prescribed
senior management responsibilities apply to which type of core SMCR firm and enhanced scope SMCR firm. (2) SMCR firms in (1) are divided into the following categories for the purposes of in (1):
(a) UK core SMCR firm;
(b) overseas core SMCR firm (excluding an EEA SMCR firm); and (c) enhanced scope SMCR firm.
4.2 R Table: FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility applying to solo
regulated firms
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

FCA 2018/XX
Brief description of responsibility
Reference letter of responsibility
UK core firm
Third country core firm
Enhanced scope firm
Responsibility for the firm’s performance of its obligations under the senior managers regime (a) ✓ ✓ ✓ Responsibility for the firm’s performance of its obligations under the employee certification regime (b) ✓ ✓ ✓ Financial crime (d) ✓ ✓ ✓ COCON (b-1) ✓ ✓ ✓ Management responsibilities maps (c) × × ✓ Internal audit oversight (j) × × ✓ Compliance oversight (k) × × ✓ Risk oversight (l) × × ✓ CASS (z) ✓ ✓ ✓ Independence of outsourced internal audit (j-3) × × ✓ Business model (t) × × ✓ Stress tests (s) × × ✓ COLL value for money assessment and independent director requirements) (za) ✓ ✓ ✓ UK risk management (aa) × ✓ × Compliance with UK regulatory system (ff) × ✓ × Escalation of correspondence (ee) × ✓ × Note: The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in accordance with the classification of firms in SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R. Therefore:
(1) UK core firm (column three) refers to SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R(2)(a);

FCA 2018/XX
(2) Third country core firm (column four) refers to SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R(2)(b); and (3) Enhanced scope firm (column five) refers to SYSC 24 Annex 1 4.1R(2)(c). Amend the following as shown. 25 Senior managers and certification regime: Management responsibilities maps and handover procedures and material
25.1 Application and purpose
Main application rules
25.1.1 R This chapter applies to:
(1) an SMCR banking firm; and
(2) a Solvency II firm (including a large non-directive insurer) but excluding:
(a) an insurance special purpose vehicle; and (b) a firm in SYSC 23 Annex 1 4.2R (firms in run-off); and (3) an enhanced scope SMCR firm; except to the extent that this chapter applies a narrower scope to a particular provision. …
25.3 Management responsibilities maps: Exclusion of non-financial services
activities for some firms [This part has been left blank deliberately]
25.3.1 R An enhanced scope SMCR firm may prepare its management responsibilities
map so that (subject to SYSC 25.3.4R) it only includes its management and governance arrangements to the extent that they cover, support or otherwise relate to its SMCR financial activities.
25.3.2 G Support functions that should be covered by a management responsibilities
map despite SYSC 25.3.1R might include:
(1) human resources;
(2) the firm’s information technology; and (3) compliance and legal services.
25.3.3 G (1) A firm may have a non-financial services business in addition to
carrying on its SMCR financial activities. Its support services may

FCA 2018/XX support both aspects of its business and its management responsibilities map may therefore still need to cover the support services even though they also cover the firm’s non-financial services business. (2) Take for example human resources. If the firm’s human resources function covers the firm’s entire workforce without separating the parts that deal with the firm’s financial services and its other business, the management responsibilities map should cover the entire human resources function. (3) On the other hand, the firm may separate the part of its human resources function that deals with those working in its financial services business from the part that deals with the other part of its business. In that case the management responsibilities map may leave out (subject to SYSC 25.3.4R) the part of the human resources function that covers its non-financial services business.
25.3.4 R If a firm uses the exclusion in SYSC 25.3.1R it must include sufficient
information about the excluded management and governance arrangements to show how the included management and governance arrangements fit in with the firm’s management and governance arrangements as a whole.
25.4 Guidance about what should be in a management responsibilities map
…
25.4.11 G The executive director function, the other local responsibility function, the
group entity senior manager function, the partner function and the other overall responsibility function are defined generally and generically and can be performed by several people. Therefore, there is no need to explain why several people perform one of the functions. …
25.9 Handover procedures and material
Application
…
25.9.3 R [This has been left blank deliberately] This section does not apply to a fullscope UK AIFM in relation to its managing an AIF.
…
26 Senior managers and certification regime: Overall and local responsibility
26.1 Application

FCA 2018/XX
Main application rules
26.1.1 R This chapter applies to:
(1) an SMCR banking firm; and
(2) a Solvency II firm (including a large non-directive insurer) but excluding:
(a) an insurance special purpose vehicle; and (b) a firm in SYSC 23 Annex 1 4.2R (firms in run-off); and (3) an enhanced scope SMCR firm; except to the extent that this chapter applies a narrower scope to a particular provision. … Territorial scope …
26.1.7 R Table: Application of this chapter to a third-country SMCR firm
Reference in this
chapter
Modification
… … chief executive branch manager or the person performing the head of third country branch function or the PRA’s Head of Overseas Branch designated senior management function
26.2 Purpose
26.2.1 G The purpose of this chapter is to ensure, together (in the case of a PRAauthorised person) with the equivalent PRA requirements and the
requirements about FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities in SYSC 24 (Senior managers and certification regime: Allocation of prescribed responsibilities), that:
…
…

FCA 2018/XX
26.4 Exclusions
Exclusions where other requirements apply
26.4.1 R …
26.4.2 R SYSC 26.3 (Main rules) does not require a firm PRA-authorised person to
ensure that SMF managers have local or overall responsibility for any activity, business area or management function that is:
…
…
Exclusion where the 12-week rule applies
26.4.6 R (1) This rule applies where:
(a) a firm appoints someone to perform a function in order to provide cover as described in SUP 10C.3.13R(1) (The 12- week rule) or (in the case of a PRA-authorised person) the PRA equivalent; and (b) the firm has allocated any responsibilities (the “Responsibilities”) under SYSC 26.3 (Main rules) to the SMF manager (the absent manager) who is absent as described in SUP 10C.3.13R(2) or (in the case of a PRA-authorised person) the PRA equivalent. (2) While the disapplication of the designated senior management function provided for in SUP 10C.3.13R or (in the case of a PRAauthorised person) the PRA equivalent is still in force the firm may allocate the Responsibilities to an employee who is not an SMF manager. …
26.4.8 G …
Exclusion of non-financial services activities
26.4.9 R SYSC 26.3 (Main rules) only requires an enhanced scope SMCR firm to
allocate responsibility for activities, business areas and management functions to the extent that they support, form part of or otherwise relate to its SMCR financial activities.
26.4.10 G SYSC 25.3.2G and SYSC 25.3.3G (Management responsibilities maps:
Exclusion of non-financial services activities for some firms) are relevant to when an enhanced scope SMCR firm may exclude support services from the allocation of responsibilities under this chapter.

FCA 2018/XX
Exclusion for AIFMD
26.4.11 R A full-scope UK AIFM may treat managing an AIF as not being part of its
SMCR financial activities for the purposes of this chapter. …
26.10 Group management arrangements and outsourcing
…
26.10.2 G …
26.10.3 G (1) This chapter does not cover responsibility for an aspect of a firm’s
PRA-authorised person’s affairs managed by an individual approved to perform the Group Entity Senior Manager or the Group Entity Senior Insurance Manager PRA-designated senior management function (see SYSC 26.4.2R (Exclusions where other requirements apply). (2) Where a responsibility is held by someone approved to perform one of those PRA-designated senior management functions for the firm PRA-authorised person, there is no need to appoint that person under this chapter and apply the arrangements in SYSC 26.10.1G. … … 27 Senior managers and certification regime: Certification regime …
27.2 Requirements of the certification regime
…
Fitness to act
…
27.2.8 G …
(3) In deciding how much reliance to put on the contractor, the firm should take into account:
(a) the familiarity of the contractor with the obligations of firms under this chapter, the corresponding PRA requirements (if the firm is a PRA-authorised person) and the requirements of the Act described in this chapter; …

FCA 2018/XX
…
27.6 Other exclusions
…
27.6.6 R …
Exclusions: Sole traders
27.6.7 G (1) An individual sole trader will not themselves be a certification
employee.
(2) However members of a sole trader’s staff may be.
(3) Therefore the certification regime does not apply to a sole trader with no employees. Exclusions: Internally managed AIFs
27.6.8 R This chapter does not apply to a firm that meets the following conditions:.
(1) it is an internally managed AIF;
(2) it is a body corporate; and
(3) it is not a collective investment scheme.
…
27.8 Definitions of the FCA certification functions
CASS oversight function
27.8.1 R (1) Each of the following is an FCA certification function:
(a) in relation to a CASS medium firm and a CASS large firm (other than a CASS large debt management firm), the function of acting in the capacity of a person who is allocated the function in CASS 1A.3.1AR (oversight of operational effectiveness); (b) in relation to a CASS large debt management firm, the function of acting in the capacity of a person who is allocated the function in CASS 11.3.4R (oversight of operational effectiveness); (c) in relation to a CASS small firm, the function of acting in the capacity of a person who is allocated the function in CASS 1A.3.1R (oversight of operational effectiveness). …

FCA 2018/XX
…
Material risk takers
…
27.8.15 R Table: Definition of material risk taker
Type of SMCR firm Employees included
…
(3) …
(4) A firm falling within SYSC
19A.1 (application provisions for the remuneration code for IFPRU investment firms) Each member of the Remuneration Code staff of the firm in column (1). (5) A firm that would fall within SYSC 19A.1 if it applied to an incoming EEA firm For these purposes subparagraphs (i) and (ii) in SYSC 19A.1.1R(1)(d) (application of the Remuneration Code) do not apply. In relation to a firm in column (1), the definition of Remuneration Code staff is extended so that it includes employees of this kind of firm in the same way as it includes employees of an overseas firm in row (4) of this
table.
(6) A firm falling within SYSC
19B.1 (application provisions for the remuneration code for a fullscope UK AIFM) Each member of the AIFM Remuneration Code staff of the firm in column (1). (7) An above-threshold non-EEA AIFM or an incoming EEA AIFM In relation to a firm in column (1), the definition of AIFM Remuneration Code staff is extended so that it includes employees of this kind of firm in the same way as it includes employees of firms in row (6) of this
table.
(8) A firm falling within SYSC
19C.1 (application provisions for remuneration code for BIPRU firms) Each member of the BIPRU Remuneration Code staff of the firm in column (1). (9) A firm that would fall within SYSC 19C.1 if it applied to an In relation to a firm in column (1), the definition of BIPRU Remuneration Code staff is extended so that it

FCA 2018/XX incoming EEA firm or an incoming Treaty firm includes employees of this kind of firm in the same way as it includes employees of a third country BIPRU firm in column (1) of row (8) of this
table.
(10) A firm falling within SYSC
19E.1 (application provisions for remuneration code for UCITS management companies) Each member of the UCITS Remuneration Code staff of the firm in column (1). (11) An EEA UCITS management company In relation to a firm in column (1), the definition of UCITS Remuneration Code staff is extended so that it includes employees of this kind of firm in the same way as it includes employees of firms in row (10) of this
table.
…
TP 6 Transitional Provision 6
(1) (2) Material provision to which transitional provision applies (3) (4) Transitional provision (5) Transitional provision:
dates in force
(6)
Handbook provisions:
coming into force
…
5 …
6 SYSC
5.2.30R
(row 2) and
SYSC
5.2.33R
[deleted]
R The rule in column 2, as it was in force on 28 June 2018, continues to apply to a benchmark administrator, until that administrator becomes authorised or registered under the benchmarks regulation, or ceases to be authorised for From 29 June 2018 Already in force

FCA 2018/XX administering a specified benchmark.
… … … … … …
…

FCA 2018/XX
Annex C
Amendments to the Code of Conduct sourcebook (COCON) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
1 Application and purpose
1.1 Application
…
To whom does it apply?
…
1.1.2 R Table: To whom does COCON apply?
Persons to whom COCON Applies Comments
(6) … …
(B) …
(C) This row (6) also does not apply to an employee of an SMCR firm that is an FCA-authorised person until [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]. … … To what conduct does it apply? … 1.1.8A R (1) This rule applies to a person (P):
(a) who is an approved person approved to perform a controlled function under SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representatives) SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives) in relation to an appointed representative (AR); and

FCA 2018/XX
(b) for whom P’s authorised approved person employer is an SMCR firm (F); and (c) to whom COCON also applies in P’s capacity as a member of F’s the conduct rules staff of AR’s principal. (2) … (a) … (i) … (ii) in relation to the carrying on of a regulated activity by the appointed representative in SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR concerned AR; and … … 4 Specific guidance on individual conduct rules …
4.2 Specific guidance on senior manager conduct rules
…
4.2.16 G The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples of conduct that would be
in breach of rule SC2.
…
(8) For a senior conduct rules staff member who is responsible for the compliance function, failing to ensure that:
…
(e) the method of determining the remuneration complies, where applicable, with the Remuneration Code or, for a Solvency II firm or a small non-directive insurer, other relevant requirements in relation to remuneration, as well as those remuneration codes applicable to firms as set out in SYSC 19B – 19E. …
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main commencement date for soloregulated firms]

FCA 2018/XX
1 Application and purpose
1.1 Application
…
To whom does it apply?
…
1.1.2 R Table: To whom does COCON apply?
Persons to whom COCON Applies Comments
…
(6) Any employee of an SMCR firm not coming within another row of this
table, except one listed in column (2)
of this table.
…
(C) This row (6) also does not apply to an employee of an SMCR firm that is an FCA-authorised person until [ ] 20[ ] [one year after main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]. … …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex D
Amendments to the Threshold Conditions (COND) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text. 2 The threshold conditions …
2.5 Suitability
…
2.5.3 G (1) The emphasis of the threshold conditions set out in paragraphs 2E
and 3D of Schedule 6 of the Act is on the suitability of the firm itself. The suitability of each person who performs a controlled function will be assessed by the FCA and/or the PRA, as appropriate, under the approved persons regime (in relation to an FCA-approved person, see SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives), SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms) and FIT). In certain circumstances, however, the FCA may consider that the firm is not suitable because of doubts over the individual or collective suitability of persons connected with the firm. … …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex E
Amendments to the Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (APER) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text, unless otherwise stated. 1.1A Application Who? 1.1A.1 R APER applies to FCA-approved persons who are either:
(1) approved persons of firms that are not SMCR firms; or (2) approved persons approved to perform a controlled function in SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representatives) SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives). 1.1A.1A G (1) APER does not apply to FCA-approved persons of SMCR firms. COCON applies instead. (2) However, APER applies to approved persons approved to perform a controlled function under SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representatives) even if the appointed representative's principal is an SMCR firm. [deleted] What? 1.1A.2 R (1) APER applies to the performance by an approved person of FCA controlled functions in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives) (whether or not approval has been sought and granted) . … (5) APER does not apply to conduct unless it is within the scope of
section 64A(4) of the Act (Rules of conduct).
…
Coverage of APER
1.1A.6 G APER 1.1A.7G gives examples of the effect of APER 1.1A.1R and APER 1.1A.2R. The first column says whether the example involves an FCAapproved person in relation to one or two firms. The second column explains what functions APER covers in the scenario set out in the first column. [deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
1.1A.7 Table: Examples of what activities APER covers FCA approved Coverage of APER (1) Yes, in relation to firm A Applies to the FCA controlled function. Also applies to any other function performed for firm A in relation to the carrying on by firm A of a regulated activity even if it is not a controlled function. (2) Yes, in relation to firm A. No, in relation to firm B, In relation to firm A, the answer is the same as for scenario (1). However, APER does not apply to any function that the approved person carries on in relation to firm B even if that function relates to regulated activities carried out by firm B. However, if the function that they perform in relation to firm B is a controlled function the approved person and firm B may be subject to legal sanctions (see SUP 10A.13.1G to SUP 10A.13.2G). 1.1A.8 G (1) A person may be an approved person in relation to more than one firm. When that is the case, APER applies in relation to all those firms. (2) APER does not apply if the firm is an SMCR firm, except for approved persons of an appointed representative of an SMCR firm. (3) If a person is an approved person of a firm (A) that is not an SMCR firm and also of another firm (B) that is an SMCR firm, the result is:
(a) APER applies to the approved person in relation to firm A; and (b) COCON applies to the approved person in relation to firm B. [deleted] 1.1A.9 G (1) APER 1.1A refers to an approved person’s firm. This means their authorised approved person employer. APER 1.1A also refers to an approved person of a firm. (2) Under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) there are two kinds of approved person. (3) Section 59(1) of the Act describes the first. It covers a person who performs a controlled function under an arrangement entered into by an authorised person (“A”). In this case, the authorised approved person employer is A.

FCA 2018/XX
(4) Section 59(2) of the Act describes the second. It covers a person who performs a controlled function under an arrangement entered into by a contractor ("B") of an authorised person (“A”). In this case, the authorised approved person employer is A (and not B). [deleted] … Replace the defined term “firm” wherever it appears in APER 2, APER 3 and APER 4 with the defined term “APER employer”. This change is not made in those provisions of APER amended in the following portion of this annex. 3 Code of Practice for Approved Persons: general
3.1 Introduction
…
3.1.7A G Statements of Principle 1 to 4 apply to all approved persons. A person performing an accountable higher management function is also subject to the additional requirements set out in Statements of Principle 5 to 7 in performing that accountable function. Those responsible under SYSC 4.4.5R (Apportionment of responsibilities) for the firm’s apportionment obligation will be specifically subject to Statement of Principle 5 (and see, in particular, APER 4.5.6G). In addition, it will be the responsibility of any such approved person to oversee that the firm has appropriate systems and controls under Statement of Principle 7 (and see, in particular, APER 4.7.3G). 3.1.7B G (1) Statements of Principle 1 to 4 apply to an approved person’s conduct in relation to:
(a) the appointed representative for which they work; and (b) things directly done for their authorised approved person employer. (2) Statements of Principle 5 to 7 only apply to an approved person’s management functions in relation to the appointed representative for which they work. …
3.1.9 G (1) UK domestic firms An APER employer that has its registered office
(or, if it has no registered office, its head office) in the United Kingdom with a premium listing of equity shares are is subject to the UK Corporate Governance Code, whose internal control provisions are amplified in the publication entitled ‘Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting (September 2014)’ issued by the Financial Reporting

FCA 2018/XX
Council. Firms regulated by the FCA An APER employer in this category will be subject to that code as well as to the requirements and standards of the regulatory system. (2) In Where (1) applies, in forming an opinion whether approved persons have complied with its the requirements of the regulatory system, the FCA will give due credit for their following corresponding provisions in the UK Corporate Governance Code and related guidance.
3.1.10 R (1) In the case of an approved person approved to perform a controlled
function in SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representatives), a reference in in APER 2 to APER 4 to a firm is a reference to:
(a) the appointed representative in relation to which that approved person performs the controlled function in SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR; and (b) their authorised approved person employer. (2) For the purposes of Statements of Principle 5 to 7 the reference is only to (a). [deleted] … 4 Code of Practice for Approved Persons: specific …
4.5 Statement of Principle 5
…
4.5.2 G In the opinion of the FCA, conduct of the type described in APER 4.5.3G,
APER 4.5.4G, APER 4.5.6G or APER 4.5.8G does not comply with Statement of Principle 5. …
4.5.6 G In the case of an approved person who is responsible under SYSC 4.4.5R(1)
for dealing with the appointment of responsibilities under SYSC 4.4.3R, failing to take reasonable care to maintain a clear and appropriate apportionment of significant responsibilities among the firm’s directors and senior managers falls within APER 4.5.2G. [deleted]
4.5.7 G Behaviour of the type referred to in APER 4.5.6G includes, but is not limited
to:
(1) failing to review regularly the significant responsibilities which the firm is required to apportion;

FCA 2018/XX
(2) failing to act where that review shows that those significant responsibilities have not been clearly apportioned. [deleted] …
4.7 Statement of Principle 7
…
4.7.3 G Failing to take reasonable steps to implement (either personally or through a
compliance department or other departments) adequate and appropriate systems of control to comply with the relevant requirements and standards of the regulatory system in respect of the regulated activities of the firm APER employer in question (as referred to in Statement of Principle 7) falls within APER 4.7.2G. In the case of an approved person who is responsible, under SYSC 4.4.5R(2), with overseeing the firm’s obligation under SYSC 4.1.1R, failing to take reasonable care to oversee the establishment and maintenance of appropriate systems and controls falls within APER 4.7.2G. …
4.7.9 G In the case of the money laundering reporting officer, failing to discharge
the responsibilities imposed on them by the firm in accordance with SYSC 6.3.9R falls within APER 4.7.2G. [deleted]
4.7.10 G In the case of an approved person performing an accountable higher
management function responsible for compliance in respect of the following provisions, failing to take reasonable steps to ensure that appropriate compliance systems and procedures are in place falls within APER 4.7.2G:
[deleted]
(1) [deleted]
(2) SYSC 6.1.4R; or
(3) article 22(3) of the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1
Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1
3.3R); or
(4) SYSC 6.1.4AR.
…
4.7.11A G Where the approved person is a proprietary trader under SUP 10A.9.10R, failing to maintain and comply with appropriate systems and controls in relation to that activity falls within APER 4.7.2G. [deleted] …

FCA 2018/XX

FCA 2018/XX
Annex F
Amendments to the Fit and Proper test for Employees and Senior Personnel sourcebook (FIT) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 1 General
1.1 Application and purpose
1.1.1 G FIT applies to:
(1) a firm (including an SMCR firm);
…
(6) a certification employee performing an FCA certification function; and (7) a person whom an SMCR firm is proposing to certify to perform an FCA certification function; and (8) a board director as set out in FIT 1.1.2(e).
1.1.2 G The purpose of FIT is to set out and describe the criteria that:
(1) an SMCR firm should consider when:
…
(c) assessing the fitness and propriety of a person whom the firm is proposing to certify to perform an FCA certification function; and (d) assessing the continuing fitness and propriety of a person whom the firm has certified to perform an FCA certification function; and (e) (in the case an FCA-authorised person that is not a limited scope SMCR firm) assessing the fitness of a non-SMF board director subject to competence requirements under the competent employees rule, any directly applicable EU legislation or any other requirement of the regulatory system. …
1.1.3 G The table in FIT 1.1.4G summarises the situations to which FIT applies.
[deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
1.1.4 G Table: Situations to which FIT applies [deleted]
What FIT applies to
Does it apply to
SMCR firms?
Does it apply to firms that are not
SMCR firms?
Comment
(1) A firm assessing the fitness and propriety of a candidate whom the firm is proposing to put forward for approval Yes No However, the answer to Question 11 in SUP 10A
Annex 1 (Frequently
asked questions) says that the FCA’s approval process is not a substitute for the checks that a firm should be carrying out on its prospective recruits. FIT may be a useful guide to matters that a firm that is not an SMCR firm should take into account. (2) A firm assessing the continuing fitness and propriety of an approved person Yes No However, a firm should employ personnel with the skills, knowledge and expertise necessary for the discharge of the responsibilities allocated to them (SYSC 5.1). FIT may be a useful guide to matters which a firm should take into account if it is not an SMCR firm. (3) The FCA assessing the fitness and propriety of a candidate for approval as an approved person Yes Yes (4) The FCA assessing the continuing fitness and propriety of an approved person Yes Yes

FCA 2018/XX
(5) A firm assessing the fitness and propriety of a person whom a firm is proposing to certify to perform an FCA certification function Yes No See the comment on row (2) (6) A firm assessing the continuing fitness and propriety of a person whom a firm has certified to perform an FCA certification function Yes No See the comment on row (2)
1.2 Introduction
1.2.-1 G Under section 60A(1) of the Act, before an SMCR a firm may make an application for the FCA’s approval of a controlled function the firm must be satisfied that the person for whom the application is made is a fit and proper person to perform that function. … 1.2.1B G Under sections 60A and 63F of the Act, in assessing whether a person is a fit and proper person to perform an FCA designated senior management function or an FCA certification function, an SMCR a firm must have particular regard to whether that person:
…
…
1.3 Assessing fitness and propriety
…
1.3.2A G An SMCR A firm assessing the fitness and propriety of staff being assessed under FIT should consider:
…
1.3.2B G An SMCR A firm is reminded that, in assessing a candidate for a position within the management body of the firm, SYSC 4.3A.3R(3) requires the firm

FCA 2018/XX to ensure that the management body, as a collective, possesses adequate knowledge, skills and experience to understand the firm’s activities.
1.3.3 G The criteria listed in FIT 2.1 to FIT 2.3 are guidance and will be applied in
general terms when the FCA is determining a person’s fitness and propriety. It would be impossible to produce a definitive list of all the matters which would be relevant to a particular determination. An SMCR A firm assessing the fitness and propriety of staff being assessed under FIT should be guided by substantially the same criteria in FIT 2.1 to FIT 2.3 (to the extent applicable to the firm), recognising that this is not intended to be a definitive list of matters to be considered.
1.3.4 G If a matter comes to the FCA’s attention which suggests that the person
might not be fit and proper, the FCA will take into account how relevant and how important it is. In the same way, if a matter comes to the attention of an SMCR a firm which suggests that any staff being assessed under FIT might not be fit and proper, the firm should take into account how relevant and how important that matter is. 1.3.4A G An SMCR A firm assessing the continuing fitness and propriety of an approved person is required to notify the FCA under section 63(2A) of the Act if it forms the opinion that there are grounds on which the FCA could withdraw its approval (see SUP 10C.14.24R). In discharging its obligation to notify the FCA, an SMCR a firm should take into account how relevant and how important the matter is that comes to its attention which suggests an approved person might not be fit and proper before determining that a notification should be made. 1.3.4B G An SMCR A firm assessing the continuing fitness and propriety of staff being assessed under FIT should assess the role that the individual is actually performing at the time the assessment is done. For this purpose, the assessor(s) should be provided with an up-to-date job description for that individual in advance of the assessment. … 2 Main assessment criteria
2.1 Honesty, integrity and reputation
…
2.1.1A G An SMCR A firm determining the honesty, integrity and reputation of staff being assessed under FIT, should consider all relevant matters, including those set out in FIT 2.1.3G, which may have arisen either in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. Firms should inform themselves of relevant matters, including checking for convictions for criminal offences (where possible) and contacting previous employers who have employed that candidate or person. If any staff being assessed under FIT has a conviction for a criminal offence, the firm should consider the seriousness of and circumstances surrounding the offence, the explanation offered by that person, the

FCA 2018/XX relevance of the offence to the proposed role, the passage of time since the offence was committed and evidence of the individual’s rehabilitation. … 2.1.2A G In considering the reputation of staff being assessed under FIT 2.1.1AG an SMCR a firm should have regard to whether that person’s reputation might have an adverse impact upon the firm for which the function is to be performed and the person’s responsibilities.
2.1.3 G The matters referred to in FIT 2.1.1G to which the FCA will have regard,
and to which an SMCR a firm should also have regard, include, but are not limited to:
…
2.2 Competence and capability
…
2.2.1A G In determining a person’s competence and capability to perform an FCA designated senior management function or an FCA certification function, an SMCR a firm, in accordance with FIT 1.1.2G, should have regard to all relevant matters including but not limited to:
…
…
2.2.2A G The FCA would expect an SMCR a firm determining the competence and capability of staff being assessed under FIT to consider convictions, dismissals and suspensions from employment for drug or alcohol abuses or other abusive acts only in relation to a person’s continuing ability to perform the particular FCA designated senior management function or an FCA certification function for which the person is, or is to be, employed.
2.3 Financial soundness
2.3.1 G In determining a person’s financial soundness, the FCA will have regard,
and an SMCR a firm should also have regard, to any factors including, but not limited to:
…
2.3.2 G The FCA will not normally require a candidate to supply a statement of
assets or liabilities. The fact that a person may be of limited financial means will not, in itself, affect their suitability to perform a controlled function.

FCA 2018/XX
The FCA would expect an SMCR a firm to take a similar view in assessing whether staff being assessed under FIT, are fit and proper. …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex G
Amendments to the Prudential sourcebook for Investment Firms (IFPRU) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 4 Credit risk …
4.3 Guidance on internal ratings based approach: high level material
…
Corporate governance
4.3.8 G …
(2) The FCA expects an appropriate individual in a significant-influence function designated senior management function role to provide to the FCA on an annual basis written attestation that the rating system permissions required by the EU CRR have been carried out appropriately. [Note: see articles 189 and 20(6) of the EU CRR and article 3(1)(7) of CRD] …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex H
Amendments to the Conduct of Business sourcebook (COBS) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text 19 Pensions supplementary provisions …
19.5 Independent governance committees (IGCs)
…
19.5.8 G (1) A firm should consider allocating responsibility for the management
of the relationship between the firm and its IGC to a person at the firm holding an FCA significant-influence function or a designated senior management function. … …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex I
Amendments to the Client Assets sourcebook (CASS) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 1A CASS firm classification and operational oversight … 1A.3 Responsibility for CASS operational oversight 1A.3.1 R … (2) A CASS small firm that is not an SMCR firm must make the allocation in (1) to a director or senior manager who is approved to perform a significant influence function for that firm. [deleted] 1A.3.1-A G The material in CASS 1A.3.1BG about how CASS 1A.3 fits into the FCA senior managers and certification regime for SMCR firms also applies to a CASS small firm that is an SMCR firm and the function in CASS 1A.3.1R. However :
(1) the function in CASS 1A.3.1R is not a separate FCA certification function; and (2) the person performing that function will not necessarily be subject to the employee certification regime described in SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime: Certification regime). … The approved persons senior managers regime and the certification regime 1A.3.1B G (1) (a) CASS 1A.3.1AR describes the FCA controlled function known as the CASS operational oversight function (CF10a). The table of FCA controlled functions in SUP 10A.4.4R together with SUP 10A.7.9R specify the CASS operational oversight function as an FCA required function for a firm to which CASS 1A.3.1AR applies. This paragraph CASS 1A.3.1BG describes how CASS 1A.3.1AR applies to SMCR firms. (b) The CASS operational oversight function does not apply to an SMCR firm. For an SMCR firm, the The function in CASS 1A.3.1AR is not a separate controlled function and performing that function does not require approval as an

FCA 2018/XX approved person. Paragraphs (1A) to (4) describe how CASS 1A.3.1AR applies to SMCR firms. … … 1A.3.1C R If, at the time a firm that is not an SMCR firm becomes a CASS medium firm or a CASS large firm in accordance with CASS 1A.2.12R(1) or CASS 1A.2.12 R(2), the firm is not able to comply with CASS 1A.3.1AR because it has no director or senior manager who is an approved person in respect of the CASS operational oversight function, the firm must:
(1) take the necessary steps to ensure that it complies with CASS 1A.3.1AR as soon as practicable, which must at least include submitting an application for a candidate in respect of the CASS operational oversight function within 30 business days of the firm becoming a CASS medium firm or a CASS large firm; and (2) until such time as it is able to comply with CASS 1A.3.1AR, allocate to a director or senior manager performing a senior management function responsibility for:
(a) oversight of the firm’s operational compliance with CASS; (b) reporting to the firm’s governing body in respect of that oversight; and (c) completing and submitting the CMAR to the FCA in accordance with SUP 16.14. [deleted] 1A.3.1D G (1) CASS 1A.3.1CR provides a grace period for a firm that is not an SMCR firm to apply for someone to be approved to perform the CASS operational oversight function. (2) There is no equivalent to CASS 1A.3.1CR for an SMCR firm, because a person does not need specific FCA approval before carrying out the function. This is explained in (3) to (5), below. (3) As explained in CASS 1A.3.1BG(2), the function in CASS 1A.3.1AR is not, by itself, a controlled function. (4) Therefore, if an approved person is to perform the function for a an SMCR firm, it can be allocated to any director or senior manager who is already an approved person who is suitable to carry it out. (5) If the function is to be carried out by a certification employee:
(a) FCA approval is not needed because performance of a role that falls into the certification regime does not require FCA approval;

FCA 2018/XX
(b) the firm should:
(i) either issue them with a certificate under SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Certification regime) before the firm becomes a CASS medium firm or a CASS large firm; or (ii) give the function to a suitable approved person pending issue of the certificate. [deleted] … 1A.3.3 R (1) Subject to (2), a firm must make and retain an appropriate record of the person to whom responsibility is allocated in accordance with CASS 1A.3.1R, or CASS 1A.3.1AR or CASS 1A.3.1CR(2). … … 11 Debt management client money chapter …
11.3 Responsibility for CASS operational oversight
CASS small debt management firm other than a not-for-profit debt advice body
11.3.1 R …
(2) A firm that is not an SMCR firm must make the allocation in (1) to a director or senior manager approved to perform a significant influence function in relation to that firm. [deleted] … CASS small debt management firm that is a not-for-profit debt advice body
11.3.2 R …
11.3.2A G (1) CASS 11.3.3G(5) to (11) do not apply to a CASS small debt management firm that is a not-for-profit debt advice body. This is because neither SYSC 24 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Allocation of prescribed responsibilities) nor SYSC 26 (Senior managers and certification regime: Overall and local responsibility) apply to it. (2) It will not have any SMF managers as no designated senior management functions apply to it. (3) The function in CASS 11.3.2R is not a separate FCA certification function and the person performing that function will not necessarily

FCA 2018/XX be subject to the employee certification regime described in SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime: Certification Regime). CASS large debt management firms firm: the CASS operational oversight function (CF10a)
11.3.3 G (1) CASS 11.3.4R describes the FCA controlled function known as the
CASS operational and oversight function (CF10a) in relation to CASS large debt management firms, including not-for-profit debt advice bodies. [deleted] (2) As a consequence of CASS 11.3.4R (in conjunction with SUP 10A.4.1R and SUP 10A.7.10R), in a CASS large debt management firm (including a not-for-profit debit advice body fitting into that category) the function described in CASS 11.3.4R is required to be discharged by a director or senior manager. (3) In the case of a firm that is not an SMCR firm, the director or senior manager in (2) should be an approved person under the approved persons regime provided for in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons). (4) However, the CASS operational oversight function does not apply to an SMCR firm. [deleted] … …
11.3.5 R If, at the time a CASS debt management firm that is not an SMCR firm
becomes a CASS large debt management firm in accordance with CASS 11.2.8R, the firm is not able to comply with CASS 11.3.4R because it has no director or senior manager who is an approved person in respect of the CASS operational oversight function, the firm must:
(1) take the necessary steps to ensure that it complies with CASS 11.3.4R as soon as practicable, which must at least include submitting an application for a candidate in respect of the CASS operational oversight function within 30 business days of the firm becoming a CASS large debt management firm; and (2) until such time as it is able to comply with CASS 11.3.4R, allocate to a director or senior manager performing a significant-influence function responsibility for:
(a) oversight of the firm’s operational compliance with CASS; (b) reporting to the firm’s governing body in respect of that oversight; and (c) completing and submitting the CMAR to the FCA in accordance with SUP 16.14. [deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
11.3.5A G (1) CASS 11.3.5R provides a grace period for a firm that is not an SMCR firm to apply for someone to be approved to perform the CASS operational oversight function. (2) There is no equivalent to CASS 11.3.5R for an SMCR firm, because a person does not need specific FCA approval before carrying out the function. This is explained in (3) to (5), below. (3) As explained in CASS 11.3.3G, the function in CASS 11.3.5R is not, by itself, a controlled function. (4) Therefore, if an approved person is to perform the function for an SMCR firm, it can be allocated to any director or senior manager who is already an approved person who is suitable to carry it out. (5) If the function is to be carried out by a certification employee:
(a) FCA approval is not needed because performance of a role that falls into the certification regime does not require FCA approval; (b) the firm should:
(i) either issue them with a certificate under SYSC 27 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Certification regime) before the firm becomes a CASS large debt management firm; or (ii) give the function to a suitable approved person pending issue of the certificate. [deleted] …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex J
Amendments to the Supervision manual (SUP) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text, unless otherwise stated.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main commencement date for
solo-regulated firms]
After SUP TP 11 (Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016: Approved persons in insurers) insert a new SUP TP 12. The text is not underlined. TP 12 Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016: Approved persons in soloregulated firms
12.1 Application and purpose
12.1.1 R (1) SUP TP 12 applies to solo-regulated SMCR firms.
(2) SUP TP 12.15 applies to every firm.
12.1.2 G (1) SUP TP 12 has transitional provisions relating to the changes to the
approved persons regime made by Part 2 of the Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016 and the Individual Accountability (FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018. (2) In particular, it has procedures for converting existing approvals for the performance of controlled functions into approvals for the corresponding designated senior management functions.
12.1.3 G (1) The main time period for which SUP TP 12 operates is [the year in
which the main commencement date for solo-regulated firms falls]. (2) There are transitional provisions that can apply beyond that period. They are based on events occurring during that period.
12.1.4 G Most of SUP TP 12 relates SUP 10C.
12.1.5 G SUP TP 12.22 has a glossary of terms used in SUP TP 12 which have
meanings that only apply in SUP TP 12. These terms appear in bold type in SUP TP 12.
12.2 Conversion of existing approvals

FCA 2018/XX
12.2.1 R If the conditions set out in SUP TP 12.2.2R are met, a pre-implementation
approval in relation to a particular approved person (AP) and a particular solo-regulated SMCR firm (F) has effect on and after the commencement date as if it had been given in relation to the FCA-designated senior management function or FCA-designated senior management functions specified in SUP TP 12.2.2R(2) and (3).
12.2.2 R Those conditions are:
(1) the pre-implementation approval is in effect in relation to F:
(a) (where SUP TP 12.2.10R applies this condition) at the firm specific date; and (b) immediately before the commencement date; (2) AP is performing an FCA-designated senior management function in relation to F on the commencement date; (3) the pre-implementation approval in (1) is potentially convertible into approval for the FCA-designated senior management function in (2); and (4) (where SUP TP 12.2.10R applies this condition) F has notified the FCA:
(a) between the first notification date and the commencement date; (b) that it considers that the pre-implementation approval will be converted into approval for the FCA-designated senior management function in (2) under SUP TP 12.2.
12.2.3 R (1) A pre-implementation approval is potentially convertible into
approval for an FCA-designated senior management function if a single row within the applicable part of the mapping table in SUP TP 12.2.5R contains both:
(a) the pre-implementation controlled function for which that pre-implementation approval was given; and (b) that FCA-designated senior management function. (2) An approval for a pre-implementation controlled function excluded from SUP TP 12 by SUP TP 12.4.2R is not potentially convertible into approval for any FCA-designated senior management function. (3) An approval for a pre-implementation controlled function is not potentially convertible into approval for an FCA-designated senior management function in relation to a firm if either that pre-

FCA 2018/XX implementation controlled function or that FCA-designated senior management function does not apply to the firm.
12.2.4 R (1) Part One of the table in SUP TP 12.2.5R applies to a core SMCR
firm and a limited scope SMCR firm.
(2) Part Two of the table in SUP TP 12.2.5R applies to an enhanced scope SMCR firm.
12.2.5 R Mapping table: Potential conversion of approval for existing controlled
functions into approval for designated senior management functions
Part One (core SMCR firms and limited scope SMCR firms)
(1)
Pre-Implementation
Controlled Function
(2)
New FCA-designated senior management function (3) Is notification required? Executive functions Director function Executive director function No Chief executive function (1) Chief executive function (2) Head of third country branch function (3) Executive director function (See Note 2) No Partner function (1) Partner function (2) Executive director function No Director of unincorporated association function Executive director function No Small friendly society function Executive director function No Oversight functions Non-executive director function Chair of the governing body function Yes

FCA 2018/XX
Required functions
Apportionment and oversight function
Limited scope function No
Compliance oversight function
Compliance oversight function
No
Money laundering reporting function
Money laundering reporting function
No
Significant management function
Significant management function
EEA branch senior manager function
No
Part Two (enhanced scope SMCR firms)
(1)
Pre-Implementation Controlled
Function
(2)
New FCA-designated senior management function Executive functions Director function (1) Executive director function (2) Chief finance officer function (3) Chief risk officer function (4) Head of internal audit function (5) Group entity senior manager function (6) Chief operations function Chief executive function (1) Chief executive function (2) Chief finance officer function (3) Chief risk officer function (4) Head of internal audit function Partner function (1) Partner function (2) Chief finance officer function (3) Chief risk officer function (4) Head of internal audit function Director of unincorporated association function (1) Executive director function (2) Chief finance officer function

FCA 2018/XX
(3) Chief risk officer function
(4) Head of internal audit function
Small friendly society function (1) Executive director function (2) Chief finance officer function (3) Chief risk officer function (4) Head of internal audit function Oversight functions Non-executive director function (1) Chair of the governing body function (2) Chair of the risk committee function (3) Chair of the audit committee function (4) Chair of the remuneration committee function (5) Chair of the nomination committee function (6) Senior independent director function (7) Group entity senior manager function Systems and controls Systems and controls function (1) Chief finance officer function (2) Chief risk officer function (3) Head of internal audit function Required functions Compliance oversight function Compliance oversight function Money laundering reporting function Money laundering reporting function CASS operational oversight function Other overall responsibility function Significant management function Significant management function (1) Other overall responsibility function (2) Chief operations function Notes for Parts One and Two of this table

FCA 2018/XX
(1) All references to a new FCA-designated senior management function are to FCA-designated senior management functions brought into force for the firm concerned by the Individual Accountability (FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018. (2) The conversion from the chief executive function to the executive director function only applies to a non-directive friendly society.
12.2.6 G If a pre-implementation controlled function does not apply to a firm
immediately before the commencement date, the applicable row of the
table in SUP TP 12.2.5R does not apply to it either.
12.2.7 G (1) The general principle is that a pre-implementation approval cannot
be converted to approval for an FCA-designated senior management function if that FCA-designated senior management function will not apply to the firm or to the particular approved person on the commencement date. (2) For example:
(a) If none of the FCA-designated senior management functions in a row of the table in SUP TP 12.2.5R apply to a firm on the commencement date, that row does not apply to the firm. (b) An example of (a) is that the row applying to the limited scope FCA-designated senior management function only applies to limited scope SMCR firms. (c) The convertibility of the partner function to the executive director function in Part One of the table only applies to a non-UK SMCR firm that is a partnership.
12.2.8 G Another example of the principle in SUP TP 12.2.7G is that if:
(1) the result of SUP TP 12.2 would be that an approved person is deemed to be approved to perform the other overall responsibility function or the other local responsibility function; and (2) that approved person is deemed by SUP TP 12.2 to be approved to perform any other FCA-designated senior management function for the same firm, then, for that approved person and that firm, the other overall responsibility function or the other local responsibility function (whichever is applicable) does not apply.
12.2.9 R (1) A notification to the FCA is not to be taken into account for the
purposes of SUP TP 12.2.2R(4) so far as it concerns a particular

FCA 2018/XX approved person if the firm does not include a statement of responsibilities about that approved person with the notification when required to do so by SUP TP 12.11. (2) A notification to the FCA is not to be taken into account for the purposes of SUP TP 12.2.2R(4) if the firm does not include a management responsibilities map with the notification when required to do so by SUP TP 12.12.
12.2.10 R SUP TP 12.2.2R(1)(a) and SUP TP 12.2.2R(4):
(1) apply to an enhanced scope SMCR firm; and (2) do not apply to a core SMCR firm or a limited scope SMCR firm except in relation to a pre-implementation approval for which there is a notification obligation under SUP TP 12.5 or SUP TP 12.6.
12.2.11 G SUP TP 12.2.2R(4)(a) (together with SUP TP 12.5 and SUP TP 12.6) means
that if a firm is required to submit a Form K:
(1) a failure to submit a Form K before the final notification date is a breach of the requirements of SUP TP 12; but (2) despite that breach, the pre-implementation approval can still be converted into an approval for the applicable FCA-designated senior management function as long as it is received between the first notification date and the commencement date.
12.3 Effect of conversion
12.3.1 R (1) Where, immediately before the commencement date, a preimplementation approval is subject to a suspension, condition or
limitation imposed under section 66(3) of the Act (Disciplinary powers), that suspension, condition or limitation is to be treated as if it were imposed in respect of the converted approval from the beginning of the commencement date. (2) This rule applies whether or not the FCA has given a warning notice or a decision notice under:
(a) section 63 of the Act (Withdrawal of approval); or (b) section 63B of the Act (Procedure and right to refer to tribunal); or (c) section 67 of the Act (Disciplinary measures: procedure and right to refer to Tribunal).
12.3.2 R Anything done under section 63 of the Act (Withdrawal of approval) in
respect of a pre-implementation approval before the commencement date

FCA 2018/XX continues to have effect on and after that day in respect of the converted approval.
12.4 Lapse of existing approvals and special provisions about appointed
representatives
12.4.1 R Subject to SUP TP 12.4.2R, any pre-implementation approval that is in
effect immediately before the commencement date that is not converted under SUP TP 12.2 ceases to have effect as from the beginning of the commencement date in relation to the controlled function concerned.
12.4.2 R (1) SUP TP 12 does not apply to a pre-implementation approval that
has effect under SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16AR (appointed representatives). (2) However SUP TP 12 does apply to a pre-implementation approval in (1) for a firm that will fall under SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(4) (an appointed representative that has a limited permission) when it comes into force on the commencement date. (3) (2) does not apply to a pre-implementation approval for the customer function. SUP TP 12 does not apply to such a preimplementation approval.
12.4.3 G An approval excluded from SUP TP 12 by SUP TP 12.4.2R continues in
force and is not affected by SUP TP 12.
12.4.4 G (1) A firm does not have to submit a Form C for an approved person
who had a pre-implementation approval to perform the customer function but ceases to perform that function because the customer function is (except in relation to appointed representatives) abolished after the commencement date. (2) A firm should however notify the FCA by Form C that a preimplementation approval has not been converted into approval for an FCA-designated senior management function under SUP TP 12.2 because the approved person resigned or otherwise stopped performing the FCA controlled function before the commencement date.
12.5 Notification to the FCA: Initial notification
12.5.1 R (1) A firm must notify the FCA of:
(a) each pre-implementation approval that it considers will be converted into approval for an FCA-designated senior management function under SUP TP 12.2 (assuming that the

FCA 2018/XX firm complies with the applicable notification requirements in SUP TP 12); (b) the approved person in respect of whom that preimplementation approval was given; and (c) the FCA-designated senior management function referred to in (a). (2) A firm must make the notification in (1) between the first notification date and the final notification date. (3) This rule applies to:
(a) an enhanced scope SMCR firm; and
(b) a core SMCR firm and a limited scope SMCR firm in relation to a pre-implementation approval to which column (3) of Part One of the table in SUP TP 12.2.5R applies the notification requirement in this rule.
12.5.2 G SUP TP 12.10 explains how the firm should make the notification.
12.5.3 G (1) This paragraph (SUP TP 12.5.3G) gives examples of things that a
firm should not include in a notification under SUP TP 12.5.1R. (2) A firm should not include a pre-implementation approval for the customer function. This is because there is no need to notify a preimplementation approval if it is not potentially convertible into any FCA-designated senior management function. (3) A firm should not include a pre-implementation approval if:
(a) it is potentially convertible into an FCA-designated senior management function; but (b) the firm considers that the approved person will not be performing that FCA-designated senior management function on the commencement date. (4) Therefore, a firm should not include an approved person who plans to resign before the commencement date if it is intended that they will have left the firm before then. (5) A firm should not include a pre-implementation approval if SUP TP 12.4.2R says that SUP TP 12 does not apply to it.
12.5.4 G If the firm considers that some of an approved person’s preimplementation approvals will be converted and some will not be, the
firm’s notification should:
(1) include the approved person; but

FCA 2018/XX
(2) exclude the approvals that will not be converted.
12.6 Notification to the FCA: Revision of initial notice
12.6.1 R (1) This rule applies if, before the commencement date:
(a) there is a change relating to information given in or accompanying a notification that the firm has previously made under SUP TP 12.5 (or a notification given under SUP TP 12.6); or (b) the firm giving the notice discovers that any part of that information is inaccurate. (2) Where circumstances described in (1) occur before the final notification date, the firm must submit a revision of the notice referred to in (1) to the FCA before the final notification date. (3) Where circumstances described in (1) occur between the final notification date and the commencement date, the firm must submit a revision of the notice referred to in (1) to the FCA before the commencement date.
12.6.2 G SUP TP 12.10 explains how the firm should make the revised notification.
12.6.3 G (1) This paragraph SUP TP 12.6.3G gives examples of when a firm
should revise its SUP TP 12.5 notice under SUP TP 12.6.
(2) A firm need not include in a notification under SUP TP 12.5 an approved person who plans to leave the firm before the commencement date. However that plan may change and as a result the firm may later conclude that the approved person will carry on with their job after the commencement date. If so, the firm should revise the notice. (3) If, after the notice to the FCA, the FCA grants an approval under
section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) to
someone who did not have any such approval for the firm at the time of the notice, the firm should revise its notice by including that new approved person and that new pre-implementation approval. (4) If, after a firm has given the notice to the FCA, the FCA grants a new approval under section 59 of the Act to someone who already was an approved person for the firm when the firm gave the notice to the FCA, the firm should revise its notice by including that new preimplementation approval. (5) If a firm includes an approved person in a notification under SUP TP
12.5 and the firm later concludes that that person’s pre-

FCA 2018/XX implementation approval will no longer qualify for conversion because that person will not be performing the relevant FCAdesignated senior management function for the firm on the commencement date, the firm should revise its notice. Possible reasons for this include:
(a) the approved person leaves the firm; (b) the approved person tells the firm they are going to leave the firm before the commencement date; or (c) the approved person’s job changes so that it will no longer involve performing an FCA-designated senior management function on the commencement date. (6) There is no need to include information about the matters set out in SUP TP 12.5.3G.
12.6.4 G If a firm gives a notification to the FCA under SUP TP 12.5 about an
approved person and that approved person later leaves the firm or gives up performing some of their pre-implementation controlled functions before the commencement date, the firm should notify the FCA using Form C or Form E under SUP 10A as well as a Form K under SUP TP 12.10.
12.7 In-flight applications: Conversion
12.7.1 R (1) A pre-implementation application by a firm that has not been
determined or withdrawn by the commencement date is to be treated, on and after the commencement date, as if it had been made for the corresponding FCA-designated senior management function or FCA-designated senior management functions (if there are any). (2) If a firm is required to notify a pre-implementation application to the FCA under SUP TP 12.8R, (1) only applies to a corresponding FCA-designated senior management function if the firm has included in that notification:
(a) that pre-implementation application; and (b) that FCA-designated senior management function.
12.7.2 R An FCA-designated senior management function “corresponds” to a preimplementation controlled function if approval for the latter is potentially
convertible into approval for the former and “corresponding” must be interpreted accordingly.
12.7.3 R SUP TP 12.7.1R is subject to any amendment the firm may make to the
application after the first notification date and before the commencement date to specify that on the commencement date:

FCA 2018/XX
(1) the pre-implementation application is to lapse; or (2) the pre-implementation application is to be treated as only being for some of the FCA-designated senior management functions.
12.7.4 G SUP TP 12.8.3G explains what FCA-designated senior management
functions are covered by SUP TP 12.7.1R(2).
12.7.5 G (1) SUP TP 12.7.3R is not the only way a firm may change the effect of
SUP TP 12.7.
(2) After the commencement date a firm is free to amend its application in accordance with the Act and the FCA Handbook. (3) Before the commencement date, a firm is free to amend its application in accordance with the Act and the FCA Handbook by changing the pre-implementation controlled function for which it is applying. That will affect the corresponding FCA-designated senior management function. If the firm amends its application in this way it should notify the FCA under SUP TP 12.8 as well as under SUP 10A.
12.7.6 R Subject to SUP TP 12.7.7R, a pre-implementation application lapses on
the commencement date unless it is continued in force by SUP TP 12.7.
12.7.7 R SUP TP 12 does not apply to a pre-implementation application if the preimplementation approval that would result if it was granted would be
excluded from SUP TP 12 by SUP TP 12.4.2R.
12.8 In-flight applications: Notification requirements
12.8.1 R A firm must, between the first notification date and the final notification
date, notify the FCA of every pre-implementation application if:
(1) it has not been determined or withdrawn at the time of the notification; (2) it is not excluded under SUP TP 12.7.7R; and (3) the firm would be required to notify the FCA under SUP TP 12.5 if that application had been granted and the approval was in effect immediately before the date of the notification in SUP TP 12.8.1R.
12.8.2 R The information about a pre-implementation application that the
notification must contain is the information that the firm would be required to give the FCA in a notification under SUP TP 12.5 if:
(1) that pre-implementation application had been granted; and

FCA 2018/XX
(2) the resulting approval was in effect immediately before the date of the notification in SUP TP 12.8.1R.
12.8.3 G SUP TP 12.8.1R and SUP TP 12.8.2R mean:
(1) In general only an enhanced scope SMCR firm needs to make the notification. (2) A core SMCR firm and a limited scope firm should not make a notification except in relation to an application to perform the nonexecutive director pre-implementation controlled function. (3) The information to be notified to the FCA about a particular preimplementation application includes each FCA-designated senior management function that meets the following conditions:
(a) approval for the pre-implementation controlled function for which the pre-implementation application is being made is potentially convertible into approval for that FCAdesignated senior management function; and (b) the firm considers that the approved person concerned will be performing that FCA-designated senior management function on the commencement date if the pre-implementation application is approved before then. (4) A firm should not notify the FCA about a particular preimplementation application if the firm considers that, if the application were approved before the commencement date, the approved person will not be performing on the commencement date any of the FCA-designated senior management functions into which the applicable pre-implementation approval would be potentially convertible. This might be because the firm intends that the candidate will only be in post for a short time.
12.8.4 R (1) This rule applies if, before the commencement date:
(a) a firm makes a pre-implementation application after the initial notice under SUP TP 12.8.1R; and (b) the firm would be required to notify the FCA under SUP TP
12.6 if that application had been granted and the approval
was in effect immediately before the date of the notification under SUP TP 12.8.4R. (2) This rule also applies if, before the commencement date:
(a) there is any other change relating to information given in or accompanying the initial notice under SUP TP 12.8.1R (or a notification given under SUP TP 12.8.4R), or

FCA 2018/XX
(b) the firm discovers that any part of that information is inaccurate. (3) Where circumstances described in (1) or (2) occur before the final notification date, the firm must submit a revision of the notice referred to in (1) or (2) to the FCA before the final notification date. (4) Where circumstances described in (1) or (2) occur between the final notification date and the commencement date, the firm must submit a revision of the notice referred to in (1) or (2) to the FCA before the commencement date.
12.8.5 G SUP TP 12.10 explains how the firm should make the notification.
12.8.6 G If a firm notifies the FCA under SUP TP 12.8 of a pre-implementation
application and that application is granted or refused before the commencement date, the firm should revise its notification under SUP TP 12.8.4R and, if applicable, SUP TP 12.6.
12.9 In-flight applications: Supplemental material
12.9.1 R (1) This rule applies if, in relation to a pre-implementation application
continued in effect after the commencement date under SUP TP 12.7, the FCA has before the commencement date:
(a) imposed a requirement under section 60 of the Act (Application for approval); (b) given a warning notice under section 62(2) of the Act (Applications for approval: procedure and right to refer to tribunal) or a decision notice under section 62(3) of the Act to the interested parties referred to in section 62(5); or (c) taken any step in connection with giving a warning notice or decision notice under section 62. (2) The requirement, notice or step in (1) is to be treated, on and after the commencement date, as having been imposed, given or taken in relation to the application as affected by SUP TP 12.7.
12.10 Procedure for notification
12.10.1 R A firm must only make a single notification under SUP TP 12.5 and SUP TP
12.8.1R and must do so on the same notification form.
12.10.2 R A firm must make a notification under SUP TP 12.5, SUP TP 12.6 or SUP
TP 12.8 by completing Form K (SUP TP 12.23.1R).

FCA 2018/XX
12.10.3 R A firm must make a notification or submit a document to the FCA under
SUP TP 12 in accordance with SUP 10C.15.11R(1) and (3) (Method of submission: electronic submission).
12.10.4 R (1) A firm making a notification under SUP TP 12.10.3R in accordance
with SUP 10C.15.11R(1) must use the version of Form K made available on the electronic system referred to in SUP 10C.15.11R, which is based on the version in SUP TP 12.23.1R. (2) A firm making a notification under SUP TP 12.10.3R in accordance with SUP 10C.15.11R(3) and SUP 10C.15.14R must use the version of Form K in SUP TP 12.23.1R.
12.10.5 G If a firm discovers after the commencement date that any information it has
given under SUP TP 12 is inaccurate it should notify the FCA as described in SUP 15.6 (Inaccurate, false or misleading information). If SUP TP 12.17.4R applies, the firm should notify the FCA under that rule instead.
12.11 Statements of responsibilities
12.11.1 R A firm must, in relation to each transitioned SMF manager, prepare a
statement setting out the aspects of the affairs of the firm which it is intended that they will be responsible for managing in performing their converted designated senior management function.
12.11.2 R A firm must have prepared the statement in SUP TP 12.11.1R by the
commencement date (unless it must prepare it earlier under SUP TP 12.11.4R).
12.11.3 G A firm should not send that statement to the FCA unless it is required to do
so by SUP TP 12.11.4R or SUP TP 12.11.5R.
12.11.4 R A notification to the FCA under SUP TP 12.5, SUP TP 12.6 or SUP TP 12.8
by an enhanced scope SMCR firm about an approved person or candidate must be accompanied by a statement of responsibilities about that person.
12.11.5 R A core SMCR firm and a limited scope firm must, within five business
days after the commencement date, give the FCA a statement of responsibilities for each candidate who is the subject of a preimplementation application by the firm that has been converted into an application for approval for the performance of an FCA-designated senior management function under SUP TP 12.7.
12.11.6 G A statement of responsibilities should comply with all the rules and
directions in the FCA Handbook that will apply to statements of responsibilities prepared by the firm (see SUP TP 12.16).

FCA 2018/XX
12.12 Management responsibilities maps
12.12.1 R SUP TP 12.12 applies to an enhanced scope SMCR firm that will be
required under SYSC 25 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Management responsibilities maps and handover procedures and material) to have a management responsibilities map when that chapter comes into force on the commencement date.
12.12.2 R A notification to the FCA under SUP TP 12.10.1R must be accompanied by
a management responsibilities map.
12.12.3 G A management responsibilities map should comply with all the rules and
directions in the FCA Handbook that will apply to a management responsibilities map prepared by the firm (see SUP TP 12.16).
12.13 Supplemental material about statements of responsibilities and management
responsibilities maps
12.13.1 R A statement of responsibilities and a management responsibilities map
must be prepared as of the commencement date.
12.13.2 G (1) If there has been a change relating to a statement of responsibilities
or a management responsibilities map submitted to the FCA under SUP TP 12, the firm should submit a revised version. (2) This is the effect of SUP TP 12.6 and SUP TP 12.8.4R.
12.13.3 G A firm should not assume that the FCA has reviewed a statement of
responsibilities or a management responsibilities map submitted to it for completeness, quality or accuracy. It is the firm’s responsibility to ensure that they have been prepared in accordance with the FCA’s rules and the Act.
12.14 Criminal record checks and employment references
12.14.1 R SUP 10C.10.16R (Criminal record checks) does not apply to any preimplementation application continued in effect by SUP TP 12.7.1R after
the commencement date.
12.14.2 G SUP 10C.10.16R (Criminal record checks) applies to any application for
approval made under SUP TP 12.15.
12.14.3 G SYSC TP 7.4.2R (Transitional provisions about regulatory references) has
transitional provisions about regulatory references in relation to a preimplementation application continued in effect by SUP TP 12.7.1R and applications for approval made under SUP TP 12.15.

FCA 2018/XX
12.15 Applications of approved persons to take effect from the commencement date
12.15.1 D (1) A firm may, before the commencement date, apply under section 60
of the Act (Applications for approval) for the FCA’s approval under
section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) for the
performance of an FCA-designated senior management function which comes into effect (as respects the firm) on the commencement date. (2) Any application may only be made after the first notification date. (3) Any such application is made on the basis that it is treated as being made on the commencement date. (4) The application must be made using the version of Form A or Form E applicable from the commencement date and in accordance with the other requirements to be in effect on that date.
12.15.2 G The rest of SUP TP 12 will not apply to an application under SUP TP 12.15.
In particular, it is not a pre-implementation application and the application should not be included in the firm’s Form K.
12.15.3 G Any such application should be accompanied by a statement of
responsibilities and, if SYSC 25 (Senior managers and certification regime:
Management responsibilities maps and handover procedures and material) will apply, a management responsibilities map.
12.15.4 G A firm does not have to make an application under SUP TP 12.15. It can
make an application for an existing controlled function before the commencement date under the rules and directions in force at the time of the application. SUP TP 12 will apply to such applications.
12.16 Application of ongoing requirements to converted approvals and conversion
documents
12.16.1 R (1) The rules of the FCA Handbook apply to a converted approval, as
they do to approvals granted after the commencement date.
(2) The rules of the FCA Handbook apply to a pre-implementation application that is continued in force under SUP TP 12 after the commencement date as they do to applications made after the commencement date. (3) This paragraph is subject to the other provisions of SUP TP 12.

FCA 2018/XX
12.16.2 R (1) The rules of the FCA Handbook apply to a statement of
responsibilities (including one revised under (SUP TP 12.16.4R)) as they do to a statement of responsibilities. (2) (2) applies even if the firm is not required to submit the statement of responsibilities to the FCA under SUP TP 12.12.
12.16.3 R A management responsibilities map submitted to the FCA under SUP TP
12.12 must comply with all the rules and directions in the FCA Handbook
that will apply to the firm’s management responsibilities map as from the commencement date.
12.16.4 R (1) If, since the commencement date, there has been any significant
change in the aspects of a firm’s affairs which a transitioned SMF manager is responsible for managing in performing their converted designated senior management function, the firm must provide the FCA with a revised statement of responsibilities. (2) The requirements of the FCA Handbook about an obligation under
section 62A of the Act (Changes in responsibilities of senior
managers) apply to an obligation under (1).
12.16.5 D SUP TP 12.16.1R to SUP TP 12.16.4R apply to directions in SUP 10C in
the same way as they do to rules.
12.16.6 G The table in SUP TP 12.16.7G gives examples of how SUP 10C and other
parts of the FCA Handbook apply to converted approvals.
12.16.7 G Table: Examples of how ongoing requirements apply to converted approvals
Requirement in Handbook
Summary of the requirement in column (1) How SUP 10C applies Revised statements of responsibilities SUP 10C.11.7D Submission of revised statement of responsibilities SUP TP 12.16.4R(1) mirrors section 62A of the Act (Changes in responsibilities of senior managers). This means that if after the commencement date there has been a significant change in a transitioned SMF manager’s responsibilities in relation to their converted designated senior management functions, the firm should submit a revised statement of responsibilities. It should also submit a Form J unless SUP 10C.11 says that it is not required.

FCA 2018/XX
The question of whether there has been a significant change should be decided in the same way as under section 62A of the Act. Varying an approval SUP 10C.11.10D Statements of responsibilities The powers and requirements in the Act and in SUP 10C about variation of approvals at the request of a firm and at the initiative of the FCA apply to converted approvals. If a transitioned SMF manager ceases to perform a designated senior management function but continues to perform a converted designated senior management function, the firm should submit a revised statement of responsibilities document under SUP 10C.11.12R. SUP 10C.11.12R Ceasing to carry on some functions SUP 10C.13 Other material about variations Single statement of responsibilities document SUP 10C.11.13D One statement of responsibilities for each SMF manager for each firm Applies to statements of responsibilities in the same way as it applies to statements of responsibilities. For example:
(1) If after the commencement date a firm applies for the FCA’s approval for a transitioned SMF manager to perform another FCA-designated senior management function, the statement of responsibilities prepared for that application should be combined with the statement of responsibilities required by SUP TP 11 into a single document. (2) If:
(a) after the commencement date a transitioned SMF manager is approved by the FCA to perform another FCA-designated senior management function; and (b) later there is a significant change in the transitioned SMF manager’s responsibilities;

FCA 2018/XX the firm should notify the FCA and submit a single revised statement of responsibilities document, whether the change relates to the converted designated senior management function or to the additional FCAdesignated senior management function. Complete set of statements of responsibilities SUP 10C.11.20R Complete set of current statements of responsibilities Applies to statements of responsibilities in the same way as it does to statements of responsibilities. Ceasing to carry on functions SUP 10C.11.12R Statements of responsibilities to be included in notification Applies to ceasing to carry on a converted designated senior management function after the commencement date. SUP 10C.14.5R Notification of ceasing to perform the function SUP 10C.14.7R Qualified Form C Form D SUP 10C.14.13R Changes to details Applies to a transitioned SMF manager and to changes of any details relating to the converted designated senior management function. SUP 10C.14.15R says that a firm should not submit a Form D to the FCA if the firm is required to notify the FCA under section 62A of the Act (Changes in responsibilities of senior managers) or SUP 10C.11 (Statements of responsibilities). This also applies if the firm is required to notify changes under SUP TP 12.16.4R. The Form D requirements also apply to a candidate whose application is continued in force by SUP TP 12. SUP 10C.14.15R Changes to arrangements SUP 10C.14.18R Fitness

FCA 2018/XX
Before the commencement date, the existing requirements of SUP 10A apply to changes in a candidate’s fitness. Notifications under the Act SUP 10C.14.22R Notifications under the Act Applies to notification about a transitioned SMF manager. General Requirements referring to a current approved person approval Applies to a converted approval. Requirements referring to a current approved person approval held within the last six months These requirements apply to an approval for a controlled function abolished after the commencement date and to an approval that ceased to have effect under SUP TP 12 for some other reason. These requirements also apply to an approval given up within the last six months before the commencement date even though the controlled function ceases to exist after the commencement date. FCAprescribed senior management responsibility (a) Responsibility for a firm’s performance of its obligations under the senior managers regime Includes compliance with the requirements about statements of responsibilities SYSC 25 Preparation of management responsibilities maps A management responsibilities map should include a transitioned SMF manager and their converted designated senior management functions
12.17 Making sure that the Financial Services Register is accurate
Existing notification requirements

FCA 2018/XX
12.17.1 R (1) If before the commencement date a firm is required to notify the
FCA using Form C or Form D or under SUP 10A.14.10R, that obligation continues to apply after the commencement date if the firm has not complied with that obligation before then. (2) (1) applies whether the deadline for reporting expires before or after the commencement date. (3) (1) does not apply to the customer function (unless the customer function continues to apply after the commencement date under SUP TP 12.4.2R) if the deadline for reporting expires after the commencement date. Notifying who will not be converted
12.17.2 R (1) This rule applies to a core SMCR firm and a limited scope firm (F)
in relation to a particular approved person (AP) if:
(a) F has pre-implementation approval for the performance by AP of a pre-implementation controlled function; (b) that pre-implementation approval is potentially convertible into an FCA-designated senior management function; and (c) F believes that that pre-implementation approval will not be converted into approval for the performance of that FCAdesignated senior management function. (2) If F is not already required to notify the FCA of that fact, it must notify the FCA of that fact using Form C in accordance with SUP 10A before:
(a) the final notification date; or
(b) (if the situation in (1) first arises after the final notification date) the commencement date.
12.17.3 G (1) The most likely reason for the situation SUP TP 12.17.2R to arise is
that, before the commencement date, AP resigns or gives up their controlled function or plans to do so. (2) In most cases F will already be required to notify the FCA. If so, SUP TP 12.17.2R will not apply. (3) An example of circumstances in which SUP TP 12.17.2R will apply is if:
(a) AP is going to remain in post after the commencement date; but

FCA 2018/XX
(b) their job does not come within the definition of the FCAdesignated senior management function in SUP TP 12.17.2R even though their job comes within the pre-implementation controlled function.
12.17.4 G SUP TP 12.17.2R does not apply to an enhanced scope SMCR firm. The
FCA will rely on its Form K instead.
Checking the Register
12.17.5 R A firm must, in the month beginning five business days after the
commencement date, check whether the Financial Services Register:
(1) correctly records all the firm’s SMF managers; and (2) correctly records each FCA-designated senior management function for the performance of which by the SMF manager the firm has approval; (3) includes everyone performing an FCA-designated senior management function for the performance of which the firm should have obtained approval; and (4) includes all the FCA-designated senior management functions for which the firm should have obtained approval in relation to persons in (3).
12.17.6 R (1) If:
(a) the Financial Services Register does not correctly do all the things in SUP TP 12.17.5R; and (b) the firm is not already required to notify the FCA of the facts giving rise to (1)(a) or to apply for the necessary approvals under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) the firm must (by the end of the one month period in SUP TP 12.17.5R) notify the FCA of that fact using the applicable form in SUP 10C. (2) The applicable form in (1) is, in relation to a particular person (AP) and firm, whichever one or more of the following forms in SUP 10C applies:
(a) Form A (short form) where AP is not, but should be, included in the Financial Services Register or where the Financial Services Register omits some of AP’s FCA-designated senior management functions for which the firm has approval; or

FCA 2018/XX
(b) Form C where AP is, but should not be, included in the Financial Services Register or where the Financial Services Register shows an approval for AP to perform an FCAdesignated senior management function that the firm does not have; or (c) Form E where both (1) and (2) apply; or (d) Form D in any other case.
12.17.7 G The requirement to check the Financial Services Register is particularly
important in a case where the firm is not under a notification obligation in SUP TP 12.5 and SUP TP 12.6 because:
(1) the FCA will update the Financial Services Register based on the information it has; but (2) the FCA may not have sufficient information to tell whether all the conversion conditions in SUP TP 12.2.2R have been met.
12.17.8 G (1) In practice it is unlikely that SUP TP 12.17.6R will normally apply
because the firm will already be required to notify the FCA of the matter or apply for approval. For example:
(a) if the Financial Services Register does not include a person performing an FCA-designated senior management function because the firm has not yet applied for approval, the firm should apply for approval using Form A (long or short) or Form E as soon as possible; (b) if the Financial Services Register includes a person who left the firm before the commencement date or who stopped performing their pre-implementation controlled function before then, the firm should report that using Form C (see SUP TP 12.17.1R); (c) if the pre-implementation controlled function and the corresponding designated senior management function are so different that approval for the former is not converted into approval for the latter, a non-notifying firm should report that under SUP TP 12.17.2R. (2) SUP TP 12.17.6R may apply for example if the firm has made all the notifications (if any) required by SUP TP 12 and other parts of the FCA Handbook but:
(a) the Financial Services Register does not include one of the firm’s approved persons even though their preimplementation controlled function was converted under SUP TP 12; or

FCA 2018/XX
(b) the Financial Services Register includes one of the firm’s approved persons even though none of their preimplementation controlled functions were converted under SUP TP 12.
12.18 The 12-week rule
12.18.1 G (1) SUP 10C.3.13R (The 12-week rule) allows a firm to appoint
someone (P) to perform a function which would normally be an FCA-designated senior management function without needing to apply for the FCA’s approval under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) where P is filling in for someone who is absent unexpectedly or temporarily. There is a maximum period for which P’s appointment can last. (2) When calculating the maximum time period in (1), the firm need not take into account any time spent by P before the commencement date performing what will become the FCA-designated senior management function in (1).
12.18.2 G (1) SUP 10C.3.13R only applies where P (as referred to in SUP TP
12.18.1G) is providing cover for an SMF manager whose absence is temporary or reasonably unforeseen. (2) SUP 10C.3.13R may still apply if the absence referred to in (1) began before the commencement date.
12.18.3 G SUP TP 12.18.1G and SUP TP 12.18.2G may apply even if:
(1) before the commencement date P was taking advantage of SUP 10A.5.6R (the equivalent of SUP 10C.3.13R under SUP 10A); and (2) approval for the controlled function disapplied by SUP 10A.5.6R is potentially convertible into approval for the FCA-designated senior management function in SUP TP 12.18.1G and SUP TP 12.18.2G.
12.19 Application for permission
12.19.1 D (1) This direction applies to a pre-implementation application that is
made by an authorisation applicant:
(a) between the first notification date and the commencement date; or (b) before the first notification date if it is still outstanding on the first notification date.

FCA 2018/XX
(2) A pre-implementation application in (1)(a) must comply with the requirements (if any) of SUP TP 12 that apply to a preimplementation application by a firm:
(a) of the type that the authorisation applicant will be if the authorisation application is granted or otherwise succeeds; and (b) for an approval by the FCA for the performance of the same pre-implementation controlled function. (3) An authorisation applicant must, between the first notification date and the final notification date, revise any of its preimplementation applications covered by (1)(b) to the extent necessary to meet the requirements in (2).
12.19.2 R SUP TP 12.7 and SUP TP 12.9 apply to a pre-implementation application
in SUP TP 12.19.1D.
12.19.3 D SUP TP 12.15 applies to an authorisation applicant.
12.20 Prohibition orders
12.20.1 R The changes to the FCA Handbook made by the Individual Accountability
(FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018 do not affect:
(1) a warning notice or a decision notice under section 57 of the Act (Prohibition orders: procedure and right to refer to tribunal); or (2) a prohibition order; which is given or made before the commencement date.
12.21 Reporting under SUP 15.11
12.21.1 R The first notification period under SUP 15.11.13R (Timing and form of
notifications: conduct rules staff other than SMF managers):
(1) starts on the commencement date; and (2) ends on the last day of:
(a) (in the case of a firm falling within SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.7R (credit firms with limited permission)) the first financial reporting period referred to in SUP 15.11.13R(3)(a)(i) ending after the commencement date; or (b) (for any other firm) the following August.

FCA 2018/XX
12.21.2 G SUP TP 12.21.1R(2)(a) applies however short the resulting reporting period
may be.
12.22 Terms used in SUP TP 12
12.22.1 R The terms in the first column of the table in SUP TP 12.22.2R, where they
appear in bold in SUP TP 12, have the meanings in the corresponding entry in column 2 for the purposes of SUP TP 12.
12.22.2 R Table: glossary of bespoke terms used in SUP TP 12
Part One: General
Defined term Meaning authorisation applicant an applicant for Part 4A permission, or another person seeking to carry on regulated activities as an authorised person. authorisation application the application or other process referred to in the definition of authorisation applicant. converted approval (in relation to a pre-implementation approval) the approval for an FCA-designated senior management function which that pre-implementation approval becomes under SUP TP 12.2.1R. converted designated senior management function (in relation to a transitioned SMF manager) the FCAdesignated senior management function for which they are treated as having approval under SUP TP 12.2.1R core SMCR firm, enhanced scope SMCR firm, limited scope SMCR firm, nonUK SMCR firm have the meaning set out in the amendments to the Glossary to be made by the Individual Accountability (FCAAuthorised Firms) Instrument 2018). This is subject to SUP TP 12.22.3R. corresponding (in relation to an FCA-designated senior management function and a pre-implementation controlled function) has the meaning in SUP TP 12.7.2R. firm specific date the later of the following:

FCA 2018/XX
(1) the date (if any) on which a firm makes the notification in SUP TP 12.10.1R; or (2) (if the firm has updated a notification in (1) under SUP TP 12.6 or SUP TP 12.8.4R) the date that the most recent such updated notification was made to the FCA. management responsibilities map the document required to be produced under SUP TP 12.12, including under SUP TP 12.12 as applied by SUP TP 12.19. potentially convertible has the meaning in SUP TP 12.2.3R. preimplementation application an application made under section 60 of the Act (Applications for approval) if the application is:
(1) for approval for the performance of a preimplementation controlled function; and (2) received by the FCA before the commencement date. preimplementation approval a current FCA approved person approval that is given by the FCA before the commencement date in relation to a pre-implementation controlled function. If a person is approved to perform more than one preimplementation controlled function for a firm, there is a separate pre-implementation approval in relation to each. preimplementation controlled function (in relation to a firm) an FCA controlled function that, before the commencement date:
(a) the FCA has specified for the purposes of section 59 of the Act (approval for particular arrangements); and (b) applies to the firm (even if the firm has no one approved to perform that function for the time being). solo-regulated SMCR firm a core SMCR firm, an enhanced scope SMCR firm or a limited scope SMCR firm statement of responsibilities the document required to be produced under SUP TP 12.11, including under SUP TP 12.11 as applied by SUP TP 12.19. transitioned SMF manager AP as defined in SUP TP 12.2.1R

FCA 2018/XX
Part Two: Fixed dates
Defined term Meaning first notification date [ ] 20[ ] [about three months before main commencement date for solo-regulated firms] final notification date [ ] 20[ ] [about one week before main commencement date for solo-regulated firms] commencement date [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms] Form O start date [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main commencement date for solo-regulated firms] Note: If a firm becomes a solo-regulated SMCR firm between the final notification date and the commencement date or changes category within that period, the final notification date for it is the date it becomes a solo-regulated SMCR firm or changes category.
12.22.3 R (1) Between the first notification date and the commencement date,
the question of:
(a) whether a firm is a solo-regulated SMCR firm for the purposes of SUP TP 12; and (b) (if it is) into which category it falls; is determined in accordance with SYSC 23 Annex 1 (as set out in the Individual Accountability (FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018) even though the relevant parts of that chapter are not in force for other purposes. (2) However Part Nine of SYSC 23 Annex 1 (Definition of SMCR firm and different types of SMCR firms) is adjusted so that a firm ceases to be an enhanced scope SMCR firm on the date it ceases to meet the last qualification condition that it met (as referred to in Part Nine), not one year after that date. (3) (1) does not apply to a firm that is already an SMCR firm before the commencement date. Such an SMCR firm cannot be a soloregulated SMCR firm for the purposes of SUP TP 12.
12.22.4 G (1) The effect of SUP TP 12.22.3R is that if a PRA-regulated SMCR firm
changes its permission in a way that would turn it into a solo-

FCA 2018/XX regulated SMCR firm, the conversion arrangements in SUP TP 12 will not apply to it. (2) SUP TP 12.15 will however apply and the firm can use this to apply for the approvals it needs because of its change of category.
12.22.5 G If a firm changes from being an enhanced scope SMCR firm to a core
SMCR firm or a limited scope SMCR firm after it has sent the FCA its Form K, it should notify the FCA as described in SUP 15.6 (Inaccurate, false or misleading information).
12.22.5 R (1) This rule modifies the rules for making an election to become a core
SMCR firm or an enhanced scope SMCR firm in accordance with the procedure set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1(as set out in the Individual Accountability (FCA-Authorised Firms) Instrument 2018) for the purposes of SUP TP 12.22.3R. (2) A firm may make such an election on or after the Form O start date. (3) The version of Form O in SUP TP 12.23 replaces the version in SYSC 23 Annex 2R. (4) The election takes effect for the purposes of SUP TP 12.22.3R on the first notification date or, if it is made after that date, immediately. (5) If the election is made on or after the first notification date the firm must at the same time make the following notifications and applications (based on the type of SMCR firm it has elected to become):
(a) any notification required by SUP TP 12.5, SUP TP 12.6 or SUP TP 12.8; and (b) any applications under SUP TP 12.15 if the candidate is to perform the relevant function on the commencement date.
12.23 Forms
12.23.1 R Form K
[Insert here the form titled “Conversion Notification Form – FCA Solo Regulated Firms (Form K)”. The text of this form is contained in Part One of Annex Q of this instrument]
12.23.2 R Form O
[Insert here the form titled “Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime (Pre-Commencement version) (Form O)”. The text of this form is contained in Part One of Annex Q of this instrument]

FCA 2018/XX
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]
6 Applications to vary and cancel Part 4A permission and to impose, vary or cancel requirements …
6.3 Applications for variation of permission and/or imposition, variation or
cancellation of requirements
…
How a variation of permission may affect the firm’s approved persons
6.3.8 G (1) Where a firm is submitting an application for variation of Part
4A permission which would lead to a change in the controlled functions of its approved persons, it should, at the same time and as appropriate:
(a) make an application for an internal transfer of an approved person, Form E (Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function), or make an application for an individual to perform additional controlled functions, the relevant Form A (Application to perform controlled senior management functions); see:
(i) SUP 10A.13.3D to SUP 10A.13.5G (for a firm that is not an SMCR firm); [deleted] (ii) SUP 10C.10 (for an SMCR firm); or (iii) the corresponding PRA requirements; (b) notify the FCA or PRA of any approved person who has ceased to perform a controlled function specified by that regulator, Form C (Notice of ceasing to perform controlled functions (including senior management functions)); see:
(i) SUP 10A.14 (for a firm that is not an SMCR firm); [deleted] (ii) SUP 10C.14 (for an SMCR firm); or

FCA 2018/XX
(iii) the corresponding PRA requirements; (2) If the firm intends to recruit new individuals to perform controlled functions, it should apply for approval of the individuals as approved persons as soon as possible using Form A (Application to perform controlled senior management functions); see:
(a) SUP 10A.13 (for a firm that is not an SMCR firm); [deleted] (b) SUP 10C.10 (for an SMCR firm); or (c) the corresponding PRA requirements. SMCR firm status
6.3.9 G A variation of a firm’s Part 4A permission may mean that it becomes
an SMCR firm or that it changes from one type of SMCR firm to another. This would have a number of significant consequences, which include:
(1) the application of the special powers in relation to misconduct by approved persons (see DEPP 6.2.9-AG); (2) the approved persons senior managers regime switches from SUP 10A to in SUP 10C applies; (3) COCON applies in place of APER to its staff; and (4) the other elements of the regime for SMCR firms described in SYSC 23.4 (Overview of the senior managers and certification regime) apply (which differ depending on the type of SMCR firm). …
6.3.25 G Information which may be required. See SUP 6.3.24G
Type of business
Information which may be required
All …
3. Organisation charts and details of individuals
transferring or being recruited to perform new controlled functions (see SUP 10A and SUP 10C, and the corresponding PRA requirements for details of the application or transfer procedures under the approved persons or senior managers regime).

FCA 2018/XX
… …
…
6.4 Applications for cancellation of permission
…
Approved persons
6.4.18 G (1) A firm which is applying for cancellation of Part 4A permission
and which is not otherwise authorised by, or under, the Act should, at the same time:
(a) comply with:
(i) SUP 10A.14.8R (for a firm that is not an SMCR firm); [deleted] (ii) SUP 10C.14.5R (for an SMCR firm); or (iii) the corresponding PRA requirements; and … … … 10A FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives 10A.1 Application 10A.1.1 R This chapter applies to every : (1) firm that is not an SMCR firm that has an appointed representative. ; and (2) SMCR firm, but only to the extent required by SUP 10A.1.16BR (Appointed representatives). … 10A.1.2 G This chapter is also relevant to every FCA-approved person:
(1) of a firm that is not an SMCR firm FCA-approved person of an appointed representative of an SMCR firm; and

FCA 2018/XX
(2) of any appointed representative, including of an appointed representative of an SMCR firm. … Overseas firms appointed representatives: UK services 10A.1.5 R (1) This chapter does not apply in relation to an overseas firm overseas appointed representative in relation to regulated activities which are carried on in the United Kingdom other than from an establishment maintained by it or its that appointed representative in the United Kingdom. (2) An overseas appointed representative means an appointed representative which has its registered office (or, if it has no registered office, its head office) outside the United Kingdom. Overseas firms appointed representatives: UK establishments 10A.1.6 R - (1) Only the following FCA controlled governing functions (as modified by this rule) apply in relation to an overseas firm overseas appointed representative which maintains an establishment in the United Kingdom from which regulated activities are carried on:
(a) the director function;
(b) the non-executive director function; and (c) the chief executive function. (1) the The director function where only applies to the extent that the person performing that function:
(a) has responsibility for the regulated activities of a the UK branch establishment which are likely to enable him them to exercise significant influence over that branch establishment; or (b) is someone whose decisions or actions are regularly taken into account by the governing body of that branch; establishment. (2) the The non-executive director function where only applies to the extent that the person performing one of those functions that function:
(a) has responsibility for the regulated activities of a the UK branch establishment which is likely to enable him them to exercise significant influence over that branch establishment; or

FCA 2018/XX
(b) is someone whose decisions or actions are regularly taken into account by the governing body of that branch; establishment. (3) the chief executive function; [deleted] (4) the FCA required functions; [deleted] (5) the systems and controls function; [deleted] (6) the significant management function in so far as the function relates to:
(a) designated investment business other than dealing in investments as principal, disregarding article 15 of the Regulated Activities Order; or (b) processing confirmations, payments, settlements, insurance claims, client money and similar matters in so far as this relates to designated investment business; and [deleted] (7) the customer function. [deleted] (8) An overseas appointed representative means an appointed representative which has its registered office (or, if it has no registered office, its head office) outside the United Kingdom. Incoming EEA firms, and incoming Treaty firms and UCITS qualifiers 10A.1.7 R This chapter does not apply in relation to the appointed representative of:
(1) an incoming EEA firm; or
(2) an incoming Treaty firm; or
(3) a UCITS qualifier; [deleted] if and in so far as the question of whether a person is fit and proper to perform a particular function in relation to that firm is reserved, under any of the Single Market Directives, the Treaty, the UCITS Directive, the auction regulation or the benchmarks regulation, to an authority in a country or territory outside the United Kingdom. 10A.1.8 G SUP 10A.1.7R reflects the provisions of section 59(8) of the Act and, in relation to an incoming Treaty firm and a UCITS qualifier, the Treaty and the UCITS Directive. It preserves the principle of Home State prudential regulation. In relation to an incoming EEA firm exercising an EEA right, or an incoming Treaty firm exercising a Treaty right, the effect is to reserve to the Home State regulator the assessment of the fitness and propriety of a person performing a function in the exercise

FCA 2018/XX of that right. A member of the governing body, or the notified UK branch manager, of an incoming EEA firm, acting in that capacity, will not therefore have to be approved by the FCA under the Act. 10A.1.9 G Notwithstanding SUP 10A.1.8G, an incoming EEA firm or incoming Treaty firm will have had to consider the impact of the Host State rules with which it is required to comply when carrying on a passported activity or Treaty activity through a branch in the United Kingdom. An incoming EEA firm will have been notified of those provisions under
Part II of Schedule 3 to the Act in the course of satisfying the conditions
for authorisation in the United Kingdom. [deleted] 10A.1.10 G An incoming EEA firm will have to consider, for example, the position of a branch manager based in the United Kingdom who may also be performing a function in relation to the carrying on of a regulated activity not covered by the EEA right of the firm. In so far as the function is within the description of an FCA controlled function, the firm will need to seek approval for that person to perform that FCA controlled function. [deleted] Incoming EEA firms: passported activities from a branch 10A.1.11 R Only the following FCA controlled functions apply to an incoming EEA firm with respect to its passported activities carried on from a branch in the United Kingdom:
(1) the money laundering reporting function; (2) the significant management function, in so far as the function relates to:
(a) designated investment business other than dealing in investments as principal, disregarding article 15 of the Regulated Activities Order; or (b) processing confirmations, payments, settlements, insurance claims, client money and similar matters, in so far as this relates to designated investment business; and (c) [deleted] (3) the customer function other than where this relates to the function in SUP 10A.10.7R(4) and (7). [deleted] … Incoming EEA firms etc with top-up permission activities from a UK branch 10A.1.13 R In relation to the activities of a firm for which it has a top-up permission, only the following FCA controlled functions apply:

FCA 2018/XX
(1) the FCA required functions, other than the apportionment and oversight function and the compliance oversight function; (2) the significant management function, in so far as it relates to:
(a) designated investment business other than dealing in investments as principal, disregarding article 15 of the Regulated Activities Order; or (b) processing confirmations, payments, settlements, insurance claims, client money and similar matters, in so far as this relates to designated investment business; and (c) [deleted] (3) the customer function. [deleted] 10A.1.14 R A person does not perform the significant management function for a firm under SUP 10A.1.11R or SUP 10A.1.13R if that person would not have been treated as performing any FCA controlled function for that firm if that firm had been a UK firm. [deleted] Appointed representatives Exclusions and modifications 10A.1.15 R The descriptions of the following FCA controlled functions apply to an appointed representative of a firm, except This chapter does not apply in relation to CBTL business or to an introducer appointed representative, as they apply to an FCA-authorised person: . (1) the FCA governing functions, subject to SUP 10A.1.16R and except for a tied agent of an EEA MiFID investment firm; and (2) the customer function other than in relation to acting in the capacity of an investment manager (see SUP 10A.10.7R(6)). 10.1.15A R The FCA governing functions do not apply to a tied agent of an EEA MiFID investment firm. 10A.1.16 R (1) SUP 10A.1.15R This chapter is modified in relation to an appointed representative meeting the conditions in (2) so that only one of the following FCA governing functions:
(a) director function; or
(b) chief executive function; or
(c) partner function; or
(d) director of unincorporated association function;

FCA 2018/XX applies, as appropriate, to an individual within that appointed representative who will be required to be an FCA-approved person. (2) The conditions are that:
(a) the scope of appointment of the appointed representative includes insurance distribution activity in relation to non-investment insurance contracts or creditrelated regulated activity, but no other regulated activity; and (b) the principal purpose of the appointed representative is to carry on activities other than regulated activities. 10A.1.16A R This The customer function is the only controlled function in this
chapter that applies to an appointed representative that is an SMCR
firm and has a limited permission to carry on a regulated activity prescribed for the purposes of section 39(1E)(a) of the Act as follows: . (1) FCA controlled functions apply to the appointed representative as set out in SUP 10A.1.15R and SUP 10A.1.16R in relation to the carrying on of the regulated activity, for which it does not have permission, comprised in the business for which its principal has accepted responsibility; (2) (a) unless it is a not-for-profit debt advice body, the apportionment and oversight function applies in relation to the carrying on of the regulated activity for which it has limited permission; (b) if it is a not-for-profit debt advice body and a CASS large debt management firm, the CASS operational oversight function applies in relation to the carrying on of debt management activity. 10A.1.16B R SUP 10A.1.15R and SUP 10A.1.16R apply to the appointed representative of an SMCR firm. [deleted] 10A.1.16C G (1) References in this chapter to a firm include an SMCR firm, but only to the extent required by SUP 10A.1.16BR Certain additional controlled functions apply to a firm in SUP 10A.1.16AR under SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms). (2) References in SUP 10A.1.15R and SUP 10A.1.16R to FCA governing functions and other controlled functions are to controlled functions in this chapter, not in SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms). Senior management functions

FCA 2018/XX
10A.1.16D G …
(2) Generally, the FCA does not think that a person performing a function in SUP 10A.1.16BR this chapter will have sufficient responsibility for managing the affairs of the appointed representative’s principal (as opposed to managing the affairs of the appointed representative itself) to perform a senior management function. (3) Therefore:
(a) the FCA has not designated any of the functions in SUP 10A.1.16BR this chapter as a senior management function; and (b) none of the functions in SUP 10A.1.16BR this chapter are designated senior management functions. … Members of a profession 10A.1.17 R (1) This chapter, except in respect of the FCA required functions, does not apply to an authorised professional firm in respect of its non-mainstream regulated activities, subject to (2). (2) Where the authorised professional firm has appointed FCAapproved persons to perform the FCA governing functions with equivalent responsibilities for the firm’s non-mainstream regulated activities and other regulated activities, for the firm’s non-mainstream regulated activities this chapter applies with respect to the FCA governing functions and the FCA required functions (other than the apportionment and oversight function) only. [deleted] Oil market participants, service companies, energy market participants, subsidiaries of local authorities or registered social landlords and insurance intermediaries 10A.1.18 R The descriptions of FCA significant-influence functions, other than the FCA required functions, and, if the firm is a MiFID investment firm, the FCA governing functions do not extend to activities carried on by a firm whose principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities and which is:
(1) an oil market participant; or
(2) a service company; or
(3) an energy market participant; or

FCA 2018/XX
(4) a wholly owned subsidiary of:
(a) a local authority; or
(b) a registered social landlord; or
(5) a firm with permission to carry on insurance distribution activity in relation to non-investment insurance contracts but no other regulated activity (except advising on P2P agreements). [deleted] 10A.1.19 G It will be a matter of fact in each case whether, having regard to all the circumstances, including in particular where the balance of the business lies, a firm’s principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities. If a firm wishes to rely on SUP 10A.1.18R, it should be in a position to demonstrate that its principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities. [deleted] … Bidders in emissions auctions 10A.1.21 G For a firm that is exempt from MiFID under article 2(1)(j) and whose only permission is bidding in emissions auctions, the only FCA controlled functions that apply to it are:
(1) the FCA governing functions;
(2) the money laundering reporting function; and (3) the customer function. This is because the FCA-approved person regime specifies a number of functions by incorporation of requirements in SYSC; however, a firm carrying on auction regulation bidding is only subject to SYSC to a limited extent in relation to that activity. This means that the FCA required functions do not apply to auction regulation bidding, except for the money laundering reporting function. Similarly, the significant management function does not apply in relation to auction regulation bidding because, in carrying on that activity, a firm is not subject to SYSC 4.1.1R and is not undertaking proprietary trading. [deleted] Benchmark activities 10A.1.21A G (1) For a firm which only has a permission for administering a benchmark, the following FCA controlled functions do not apply:
(a) the apportionment and oversight function; (b) the compliance oversight function;

FCA 2018/XX
(c) the money laundering reporting function; and (d) the systems and controls function. (2) That is because:
(a) the FCA controlled functions in (a) to (c) above do not apply because those functions are specified by incorporation of requirements in SYSC and the relevant parts of SYSC do not apply in relation to benchmark activities (which includes administering a benchmark); (b) the FCA controlled function in (d) above does not apply in relation to benchmark activities (see SUP 10A.8.2R). (3) The functions in (a) to (d) still apply to a firm which administers a benchmark as well as carrying on other regulated activities. However, they do not apply in respect of its activities as a regulated benchmark administrator. (4) Various other FCA controlled functions are only relevant to firms which carry on particular types of activity and will not be relevant to a firm (F) which does not carry on any regulated activities other than administering a benchmark. For instance:
(a) the CASS operational oversight function will not be relevant to F because that function is only relevant to CASS medium firms CASS large firms and CASS large debt management firms; F will not hold client money and will therefore not be a CASS medium firm, a CASS large firm or a CASS large debt management firm; (b) the customer function involves performing various types of activity none of which would be performed by a firm which does not carry on any regulated activities other than administering a benchmark; (c) the small friendly society function will only be relevant to certain firms. (5) The functions in SUP 10A.1.21AG(1)(a) to (d) do not apply to a benchmark contributor in relation to its contribution of input data to a BMR benchmark administrator. (6) That is because:
(a) the functions in SUP 10A.1.21AG(1)(a) to (c) are specified by incorporation of requirements in SYSC and the relevant parts of SYSC do not apply in relation to benchmark activities (which includes contributing input data to a BMR benchmark administrator); and

FCA 2018/XX
(b) the FCA controlled function in SUP 10A.1.21AG(1)(d) above does not apply in relation to benchmark activities (see SUP 10A.8.2R). … Internally managed corporate AIFs 10A.1.24 G In accordance with section 59(7C) of the Act this chapter does not apply to an internally managed AIF which is a body corporate and not a collective investment scheme. [deleted] Credit firms with limited permission 10A.1.25 R (1) Subject to (2) and (3), this chapter, except in respect of the apportionment and oversight function, does not apply to a firm that has limited permission in relation to the carrying on of the relevant credit activity (as defined in paragraph 2G of Schedule 6 to the Act) for which it has limited permission. (2) Subject to (3), this chapter does not apply to a not-for-profit debt advice body. (3) This chapter applies to a not-for-profit debt advice body that is a CASS large debt management firm with respect to the CASS operational oversight function only. [deleted] … Obligations on firms 10A.1.28 G (1) The requirements in this chapter about notifications and applications are addressed to firms. This means the appointed representative’s principal. (2) If an appointed representative has more than one principal, the requirements in (1) are addressed to the authorised approved person employer of the approved person in question. … 10A.2 Purpose 10A.2.1 G The immediate purpose of SUP 10A.3 to SUP 10A.11 is to specify, under section 59 of the Act, descriptions of the FCA controlled function which are listed in SUP 10A.4.4R. The underlying purpose is to establish, and mark the boundaries of, the “FCA-approved persons regime” for appointed representatives. …

FCA 2018/XX
10A.3 Provisions related to the Act
…
10A.3.3 G Arrangement is defined in section 59(10) of the Act as any kind of arrangement for the performance of a function which is entered into by a firm or any of its contractors with another person and includes the appointment of a person to an office, his their becoming a partner, or his their employment (whether under a contract of service or otherwise). For the provisions in this chapter relating to outsourcing, see SUP 10A.13.5G and SUP 10A.13.6G.
10.3.4 G If, however, a firm is a member of a group, and the arrangements for
the performance of an FCA controlled function of the firm are made by, for instance, the holding company, the person performing the function will only require approval if there is an arrangement (under section 59(1)) or a contract (under section 59(2)) between the firm and holding company permitting this. This need not be a written contract but could arise, for example, by conduct, custom and practice. [deleted] … 10A.4 Specification of functions … 10A.4.2 R The table of FCA controlled functions applies in relation to an FCAauthorised person. It also applies in relation to an appointed representative for the purposes of SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16BR (Appointed representatives) whether its principal is an FCA-authorised person or a PRA-authorised person. [deleted] … 10A.4.4 R FCA controlled functions (FCA controlled functions for FCA-authorised persons and appointed representatives) Type CF Description of FCA controlled function FCA governing functions* 1 Director function 2 Non-executive director function 3 Chief executive function 4 Partner function

FCA 2018/XX
5 Director of unincorporated association function 6 Small friendly society function FCA required functions* 8 Apportionment and oversight function 10 Compliance oversight function 10A CASS operational oversight function 11 Money laundering reporting function Systems and controls function* 28 Systems and controls function Significant manageme nt function* 29 Significant management function Customerdealing function 30 Customer function *FCA significant-influence functions 10A.5 Significant-influence functions What are the FCA significant-influence functions? 10A.5.1 G The FCA significant-influence functions, which are specified in SUP 10A.4.1R, comprise the FCA governing functions (SUP 10A.6), the FCA required functions (SUP 10A.7), the systems and controls function (SUP 10A.8) and the significant management function (SUP 10A.9). SUP 10A.5 applies to each of the FCA significant-influence functions. … Periods of less than 12 weeks 10A.5.6 R If:
(1) a firm or its appointed representative appoints an individual to perform a function which, but for this rule, would be an FCA significant-influence function;

FCA 2018/XX
…
10A.5.7 G SUP 10A.5.6R enables cover to be given for, as an example, holidays and emergencies and avoids the need for the precautionary approval of, for example, a deputy. However, as soon as it becomes apparent that a person will be performing an FCA controlled function for more than 12 weeks, the firm authorised approved person employer of the approved person in question should apply for approval. 10A.6 FCA governing functions Introduction 10A.6.1 G Every firm appointed representative will have one or more persons responsible for directing its affairs. These persons will be performing the FCA governing functions and will be required to be FCA-approved persons unless the application provisions in SUP 10A.1, or the particular description of an FCA controlled function, provide otherwise. For example, each director of a company incorporated under the Companies Acts will perform an FCA governing function. … What the FCA governing functions include 10A.6.3 R Each of the FCA governing functions includes:
(1) (where apportioned under SYSC 4.3.1R and SYSC 4.4.3R (or, for a full-scope UK AIFM apportioned under article 60(1) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation)) (a) the systems and controls function (if it applies to the firm); and (b) the significant management function; (2) (in respect of bidding in emissions auctions) that part of the customer function specified in SUP 10A.10.7R(7) (bidder’s representative). This does not apply to the non-executive director function or the function described in SUP 10A.6.8R. [deleted] 10A.6.4 G (1) The effect of SUP 10A.6.3R is that a person who is approved to perform an FCA governing function will not have to be specifically FCA-approved to perform the systems and controls function or the significant management function or the part of the customer function specified in SUP 10A.10.7R(7). However, a person who is approved to perform an FCA

FCA 2018/XX governing function will have to be additionally FCA-approved before he can perform any of the FCA required functions or the customer function (except the part specified in SUP 10A.10.7R(7)). (2) SUP 10A.6.3R does not apply to the non-executive director function. It does not apply to the director function if the only
part of that function that the FCA-approved person is
performing is the function described in SUP 10A.6.8R.
[deleted]
10A.6.5 G See MIPRU 2.2 for how the FCA’s approved persons regime is adjusted for a firm carrying on insurance distribution activity. [deleted] Director function (CF1) 10A.6.7 R If a firm an appointed representative is a body corporate (other than a limited liability partnership), the director function is the function of acting in the capacity of a director (other than non-executive director) of that firm appointed representative. 10A.6.8 R (1) If a firm an appointed representative is a body corporate (other than a limited liability partnership), the director function is also the function of acting in the capacity of a person:
(a) who is a director, partner, officer, member (if the parent undertaking or holding company is a limited liability partnership), senior manager, or employee of a parent undertaking or holding company of the firm appointed representative; and (b) whose decisions or actions are regularly taken into account by the governing body of the firm appointed representative. (2) (1) does not apply if that parent undertaking or holding company has a Part 4A permission or is regulated by an EEA regulator. (3) (1) does not apply to the function falling into SUP 10A.6.13R (non-executive director of the parent undertaking or holding company). 10A.6.9 G Examples of where SUP 10A.6.8R might apply include (but are not limited to):
(1) a chairman of an audit committee of a parent undertaking or holding company of a UK firm where that audit committee is working for that UK firm (that is, functioning as the audit committee for the group); or

FCA 2018/XX
(2) a director (other than a non-executive director) of a parent undertaking or holding company of a UK firm exercising significant influence by way of his involvement in taking decisions for that UK firm; or (3) an individual (such as a senior manager) of a parent undertaking or holding company of a UK firm who is responsible for and/or has significant influence in setting the objectives for and the remuneration of executive directors of that UK firm; or (4) an individual who is a director (other than a non-executive director) or a senior manager of a parent undertaking or holding company of a UK firm who is accustomed to influencing the operations of that UK firm, and acts in a manner in which it can reasonably be expected that an executive director or senior manager of that UK firm would act; or (5) an individual of an overseas firm which maintains an establishment in the United Kingdom from which regulated activities are carried on, where that individual has responsibilities for those regulated activities which are likely to enable him to exercise significant influence over the UK branch. [deleted] … Non-executive director function (CF2) 10A.6.12 R If a firm an appointed representative is a body corporate, the nonexecutive director function is the function of acting in the capacity of a non-executive director of that firm appointed representative. 10A.6.13 R (1) If a firm an appointed representative is a body corporate, the non-executive director function is also the function of acting in the capacity of a person:
(a) who is a non-executive director of a parent undertaking or holding company; and (b) whose decisions or actions are regularly taken into account by the governing body of the firm appointed representative. (2) However, (1) does not apply if that parent undertaking or holding company has a Part 4A permission or is regulated by an EEA regulator. 10A.6.14 G Examples of where SUP 10A.6.13R might apply include (but are not limited to):

FCA 2018/XX
(1) an individual who is a non-executive director of a parent undertaking or holding company who takes an active role in the running of the business of a UK firm, for example, as a member of a board or committee (on audit or remuneration) of that firm; or (2) an individual who is a non-executive director of a parent undertaking or holding company having significant influence in setting and monitoring the business strategy of the UK firm; or (3) an individual who is a non-executive director of a parent undertaking or holding company of a UK firm involved in carrying out responsibilities such as scrutinising the approach of executive management, performance, or standards of conduct of the UK firm; or (4) an individual who is a non-executive director of a parent undertaking or holding company of a UK firm who is accustomed to influence the operations of the UK firm, and acts in a way in which it can reasonably be expected that a nonexecutive director of the UK firm would act; or (5) an individual who is a non-executive director of an overseas firm which maintains a branch in the United Kingdom from which regulated activities are carried on where that individual has responsibilities for those regulated activities which are likely to enable him to exercise significant influence over the UK branch. [deleted] … Guidance on persons in a parent undertaking or holding company exercising significant influence 10A.6.16 G (1) This paragraph explains The explanation in SUP 10C.5B.2G of the basis on which the group entity senior manager function is included as a controlled function for an SMCR firm is also relevant to the basis on which the director function and the nonexecutive director function are applied to persons who have a position with the firm’s an appointed representative’s parent undertaking or holding company under SUP 10A.6.8R or SUP 10A.6.13R. (2) The basic position is set out in SUP 10A.3.4G. As is the case with all controlled functions, The guidance in SUP 10C.5B.3G to SUP 10C.5B.5G about when the group entity senior manager function applies to an SMCR firm is also relevant to when those who have a position with an appointed representative’s parent undertaking or holding company may be performing a controlled function under SUP 10A.6.8R and or SUP 10A.6.13R. are subject to the overriding provisions in SUP

FCA 2018/XX
10A.3.1R, which sets out the requirements of section 59(1) and (2) of the Act. This means that unless the firm has an arrangement permitting the performance of these roles by the persons concerned, these persons will not be performing these controlled functions. Therefore, the FCA accepts that there will be cases in which a person performing these roles will not require approval. However where there is such an arrangement the function may apply. Chief executive function (CF3) 10A.6.17 R The chief executive function is the function of acting in the capacity of a chief executive of a firm an appointed representative. 10A.6.18 G This function is having the responsibility, alone or jointly with one or more others, under the immediate authority of the governing body:
(1) for the conduct of the whole of the business (or relevant activities); or (2) in the case of a branch branch in the United Kingdom of an overseas firm a non-UK appointed representative, for the conduct of all of the activities subject to the UK regulatory system. 10A.6.19 G For a branch branch in the United Kingdom of an overseas firm a nonUK appointed representative, the FCA would not normally expect the overseas chief executive of the firm appointed representative as a whole to be FCA-approved for this function where there is a senior manager under him them with specific responsibility for those activities of the branch branch which are subject to the UK regulatory system. In some circumstances, the person within the firm appointed representative responsible for UK operations may, if the function is likely to enable him them to exercise significant influence over the branch branch, also perform the chief executive function (see SUP 10A.7.4G). … Partner function (CF4) 10A.6.23 R (1) If a firm an appointed representative is a partnership, the partner function is the function of acting in the capacity of a partner in that firm appointed representative. (2) If the principal purpose of the firm appointed representative is to carry on one or more regulated activities, each partner performs the partner function. (3) If the principal purpose of the firm appointed representative is other than to carry on regulated activities:

FCA 2018/XX
(a) a partner performs the partner function to the extent only that he has they have responsibility for a regulated activity; and (b) a partner in a firm an appointed representative will be taken to have responsibility for each regulated activity except where the partnership has apportioned responsibility to another partner or group of partners. 10A.6.24 G Any apportionment referred to in SUP 10A.6.23R(3)(b) will have taken place under SYSC 4.3.1R and SYSC 4.4.3R. The FCA may ask to see details of the apportionment but will not require, as a matter of course, a copy of the material which records this. [deleted] 10A.6.25 G The effect of SUP 10A.1.17R is that regulated activity in SUP 10A.6.23R (and elsewhere) is to be taken as not including an activity that is a non-mainstream regulated activity. Therefore, a partner whose only regulated activities are incidental to his professional services, in a partnership whose principal purpose is to carry on other than regulated activities, need not be an FCA-approved person. What amounts to the principal purpose of the firm is a matter of fact in each case having regard to all the circumstances, including the activities of the firm as a whole. Any regulated activities which such a partner carries on are not within the description of the partner function. [deleted] 10A.6.26 R If a firm an appointed representative is a limited liability partnership, the partner function extends to the firm appointed representative as if the firm appointed representative were a partnership and a member of the firm appointed representative were a partner. … Director of unincorporated association function (CF5) 10A.6.29 R If a firm an appointed representative is an unincorporated association, the director of unincorporated association function is the function of acting in the capacity of a director of the unincorporated association. … Small friendly society function (CF6) 10A.6.31 R (1) If a firm is a non-directive friendly society, the small friendly society function is the function of directing its affairs, either alone or jointly with others. (2) If the principal purpose of the firm is to carry on regulated activities, each person with responsibility for directing its affairs performs the FCA controlled function.

FCA 2018/XX
(3) If the principal purpose of the firm is other than to carry on regulated activities, a person performs the small friendly society function only to the extent that he has responsibility for a regulated activity. [deleted] 10A.6.32 R (1) Each person on the non-directive friendly society’s governing body will be taken to have responsibility for its regulated activities, unless the firm has apportioned this responsibility to one particular individual to whom it is reasonable to give this responsibility. (2) The individual need not be a member of the governing body. [deleted] 10A.6.33 G Typically a non-directive friendly Society will appoint a “committee of management” to direct its affairs. However, the governing arrangements may be informal and flexible. If this is the case, the FCA would expect the society to resolve to give responsibility for the carrying on of regulated activities to one individual who is appropriate in all the circumstances. That individual may, for example, have the title of chief executive or similar. The individual would have to be an FCA-approved person under SUP 10A.6.31R. [deleted] 10A.6.34 G In practice, the FCA expects that most non-directive friendly societies will be PRA-authorised persons. Where that is the case, this chapter does not apply and so the small friendly society function will not apply. [deleted] 10A.7 FCA required functions [deleted] Apportionment and oversight function (CF8) 10A.7.1 R (1) The apportionment and oversight function is the function of acting in the capacity of a director or senior manager responsible for the apportionment function and/or the oversight function set out in SYSC 4.4.5R. (2) [deleted] 10A.7.2 G In requiring someone to apportion responsibility, a common platform firm should not apply for that person or persons to be FCA-approved to perform the apportionment and oversight function (see SUP 10A.7.1R and SYSC 1 Annex 1). 10A.7.3 G The fact that there is a person performing the apportionment and oversight function, and who has responsibility for activities subject to regulation by the FCA, may have a bearing on whether a manager who is based overseas will be performing an FCA controlled function. It is a

FCA 2018/XX factor to take into account when assessing the likely influence of the overseas manager. 10A.7.4 G Generally, in relation to a UK establishment of an overseas firm or a firm which is part of an overseas group, where an overseas manager’s responsibilities in relation to the United Kingdom are strategic only, they will not need to be an FCA-approved person. However, where, in accordance with SYSC 4 to SYSC 10, they are responsible for implementing that strategy in the United Kingdom, and have not delegated that responsibility to a senior manager in the United Kingdom, they are likely to be performing an FCA controlled function for example, the chief executive function. 10A.7.5 G A firm carrying on insurance distribution activity, other than a sole trader, must allocate to a director or senior manager the responsibility for the firm’s insurance distribution activity (MIPRU 2.2.1R). The firm may allocate this responsibility to the person performing the apportionment and oversight function. 10A.7.6 G Where the person performing the apportionment and oversight function is also responsible for the firm’s insurance distribution activity, the words “(insurance distribution)” will be inserted after this FCA controlled function (see MIPRU 2.2.5G). 10A.7.7 G [deleted] Compliance oversight function (CF10) 10A.7.8 R The compliance oversight function is the function of acting in the capacity of:
(1) a director or senior manager who is allocated the function set out in:
(a) [deleted]
(b) SYSC 6.1.4R(2); or
(c) article 22(3) of the MiFID Org Regulation; or (d) article 22(3) of the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R); or (e) SYSC 6.1.4CR; or (2) for a full-scope UK AIFM, a person allocated the function in
article 61(3)(b) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation.
CASS operational oversight function (CF10a)

FCA 2018/XX
10A.7.9 R In relation to a CASS medium firm and a CASS large firm (other than a CASS large debt management firm), the CASS operational oversight function is the function of acting in the capacity of a person to whom is allocated the function set out in CASS 1A.3.1AR. 10A.7.9A R In relation to a CASS large debt management firm, the CASS operational oversight function is the function of acting in the capacity of a person to whom is allocated the function in CASS 11.3.4R. Money laundering reporting function (CF11) 10A.7.10 R The money laundering reporting function is the function of acting in the capacity of the money laundering reporting officer of a firm. 10A.7.11 G A firm's obligations in respect of its money laundering reporting officer are set out elsewhere in the FCA Handbook (see SYSC 6.3.9R and for their scope, see the application provisions in SYSC 1 Annex 1). 10A.8 Systems and controls functions [deleted] 10A.8.1 R The systems and controls function is the function of acting in the capacity of an employee of the firm with responsibility for reporting to the governing body of a firm, or the audit committee (or its equivalent) in relation to:
(1) its financial affairs;
(2) setting and controlling its risk exposure (see SYSC 7.1.6R,
article 23(2) of the MiFID Org Regulation and article 23(2) of
the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R)); and (3) adherence to internal systems and controls, procedures and policies (see SYSC 6.2, article 24 of the MiFID Org Regulation and article 24 of the MiFID Org Regulation (as applied in accordance with SYSC 1 Annex 1 2.8AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2- AR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2-BR, SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.2CR and SYSC 1 Annex 1 3.3R). 10A.8.2 R The systems and controls function does not apply in relation to:
(1) bidding in emissions auctions carried on by a firm that is exempt from MiFID under article 2(1)(j); or (2) benchmark activities. 10A.8.3 G [deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
10A.8.4 G Where an employee performs the systems and controls function the FCA would expect the firm to ensure that the employee had sufficient expertise and authority to perform that function effectively. A director or senior manager would meet this expectation. Full scope UK AIFM 10A.8.5 G For a full-scope UK AIFM, the requirement to have an employee responsible for reporting to the governing body of the firm or the audit committee for matters in SUP 10A.8.1R(2) and SUP 10A.8.1R(3) is derived from the AIFMD level 2 regulation, which imposes obligations on such firms to have a permanent risk management function and, where appropriate and proportionate for their business, an internal audit function. 10A.9 Significant management functions [deleted] Application 10A.9.1 R SUP 10A.9 applies only to a firm which:
(1) under SYSC 4.1.1R, apportions a significant responsibility, within the description of the significant management function, to a senior manager of a significant business unit; or (2) undertakes proprietary trading. 10A.9.2 G The FCA anticipates that there will be only a few firms needing to seek approval for an individual to perform the significant management function set out in SUP 10A.9.1R(1). In most firms, those approved for the FCA governing functions, FCA required functions and, where appropriate, the systems and controls function, are likely to exercise all the significant influence at senior management level. 10A.9.3 G A proprietary trader undertakes activities with the firm’s money and has the ability to commit the firm. By virtue of this role, all proprietary traders have potential to be able to exercise significant influence on the firm for the purposes of the definition of significant-influence function. Therefore, it is the FCA’s expectation that all firms will assess all their proprietary traders to ascertain the ones for whom approval is required. 10A.9.4 G The scale, nature and complexity of the firm’s business may be such that a firm apportions, under SUP 10A.9.1R(1), a significant responsibility to an individual who is not approved to perform the FCA governing functions, FCA required functions or, where appropriate, the systems and controls function. If so, the firm should consider whether the functions of that individual fall within the significant management function. For the purposes of the description of the significant

FCA 2018/XX management functions, the following additional factors about the firm should be considered:
(1) the size and significance of the firm’s business in the United Kingdom; for example, a firm carrying on designated investment business may have a large number of approved persons (for example, in excess of 100 individuals); (2) the number of regulated activities carried on, or proposed to be carried on, by the firm and (if relevant) other members of the group; (3) its group structure (if it is a member of a group); (4) its management structure (for example, matrix management); and (5) the size and significance of its international operations, if any. 10A.9.5 G When considering whether a business unit is significant, the firm should take into account all relevant factors in the light of the firm’s current circumstances and its plans for the future, including:
(1) the risk profile of the unit; or
(2) its use or commitment of a firm’s capital; or (3) its contribution to the profit and loss account; or (4) the number of employees or approved persons in the unit; or (5) the number of customers of the unit; or (6) any other factor which makes the unit significant to the conduct of the firm’s affairs so far as relating to the regulated activity. 10A.9.6 G The question may arise whether a manager who is based overseas will be performing the significant management function under SUP 10A.9.9R and should, therefore, be an FCA-approved person. This is especially true where the firm operates matrix management. The fact there is a person performing the apportionment and oversight function, and who has responsibility for activities subject to regulation by the FCA, may have a bearing on this. It is a factor to take into account when assessing the likely influence of the overseas manager. 10A.9.7 G Generally, in relation to a branch of a firm, or a firm which is part of an overseas group, where an overseas manager is responsible for strategy, he will not need to be approved for the significant management function. However, where he is responsible for implementing that strategy in the United Kingdom, and has not delegated that

FCA 2018/XX responsibility to a senior manager in the United Kingdom, he is likely to be performing that FCA controlled function. 10A.9.8 G See also SUP 10A.7.3G to SUP 10A.7.6G in relation to matrix management. Significant management function (CF29) 10A.9.9 R The significant management function is the function of acting as a senior manager with significant responsibility for a significant business unit that:
(1) carries on designated investment business or other activities not falling within (2) to (4); (2) [deleted] (2A) carries on credit-related regulated activity; (3) makes material decisions on the commitment of a firm’s financial resources, its financial commitments, its assets acquisitions, its liability management and its overall cash and capital planning; (4) processes confirmations, payments, settlements, insurance claims, client money and similar matters. 10A.9.10 R The significant management function also includes the function of acting as a proprietary trader. 10A.9.11 R The significant management function does not include any of the activities described in any other FCA controlled function if that other controlled function applies to the firm. 10A.9.12 G A senior manager carrying on the significant management function under SUP 10A.9.9R with significant responsibility for a significant business unit that carries on activities other than designated investment business for the purposes of SUP 10A.9.9R(1) could, for example, be the head of a unit carrying on the activities of: personal lending, corporate lending, salvage or loan recovery, or proprietary trading, or a member of a committee (that is, a person who, together with others, has authority to commit the firm) making decisions in these functions. 10A.9.13 G A proprietary trader also undertakes activities which may have a significant influence on the firm. Such activities may require approval for CF29 under SUP 10A.9.10R. 10A.9.14 G A firm carrying on insurance distribution activity, other than a sole trader, must allocate to a director or senior manager the responsibility for the firm’s insurance distribution activity (MIPRU 2.2.1R). The firm

FCA 2018/XX may allocate this responsibility to the person performing the significant management function. 10A.9.15 G Where the person performing the significant management function is also responsible for the firm’s insurance distribution activity, the words “(insurance distribution)” will be inserted after this FCA controlled function (see MIPRU 2.2.5G). 10A.10 Customer-dealing functions Introduction 10A.10.1 R SUP 10A.10 applies with respect to activities carried on from an establishment maintained by the firm (or by its appointed representative) in the United Kingdom. The basic rule about the customer function … 10A.10.6 G … 10A.10.6A R A function is only part of the customer function if it is:
(1) carried out for an appointed representative of an SMCR firm; or (2) otherwise performed under an arrangement under section 59(2) of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) entered into by an appointed representative of an SMCR firm. 10A.10.6B G Section 59(2) of the Act covers a controlled function performed under an arrangement entered into by a contractor of a firm in relation to the carrying on by the firm of a regulated activity. Section 59(2) is reflected in SUP 10A.3.1R(2) (Provisions related to the Act). Customer function (CF 30) 10A.10.7 R The customer function is the function of:
…
(6) acting in the capacity of an investment manager and carrying on functions connected to this; [deleted] … …

FCA 2018/XX
10A.12 Procedures relating to FCA-approved persons Forms 10A.12.1 G The forms listed in SUP 10A.12.2G are referred to in SUP 10A.12 (Procedures relating to FCA-approved persons) to SUP 10A.17 (Further questions) SUP 10A.16 (How to apply for approval and give notifications). 10A.12.2 G Table: FCA-approved persons forms Form Purpose Handbook requirement the relevant Form A The relevant online form on the FCA and PRA’s online notification and application system or the form in SUP 10A Annex 4D (See Note) SUP 10C Annex 3D Application to perform controlled functions under the approved persons regime SUP 10A.13.3D … Form E The relevant online form on the FCA and PRA’s online notification and application system system or the form in SUP 10A Annex 8D (See Note) SUP 10C Annex 7D Internal transfer of an approved person SUP 10A.14.4D Note (1): The form in the SUP annex shown is to be used by a firm whose
Part 4A permission covers only credit-related regulated activities, and by
other firms only in the event of a failure of the information technology systems used by the FCA. See the relevant “Handbook requirement”. Note (2): Where SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representative of an SMCR firm) applies, the version of the form to be used is the one required by SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms).

FCA 2018/XX
…
10A.13 Application for approval and withdrawing an application for approval … How to apply for approval … 10A.13.3B D A firm must not use Form A (shortened form) if:
(1) the firm is a MiFID investment firm (except a credit institution); and (2) SUP 10A.14.4BD applies to that application. [deleted] 10A.13.4A G When a MiFID investment firm (except a credit institution) notifies the FCA of a change using Form A or Form E, they must also submit the MiFID Article 4 APER Information Form. The details can be found in SUP 10A.14.4BD. [deleted] Who should make the application? 10A.13.5 G (1) In accordance with section 60 of the Act (Applications for approval), applications must be submitted by, or on behalf of, the firm itself, not by:
(a) the FCA candidate; or
(b) (where the FCA candidate works for the firm’s parent undertaking or holding company) by the firm’s parent undertaking or holding company the appointed representative. (2) Usually this will be the firm that is employing the FCA candidate to perform the FCA controlled function. Where a firm has outsourced the performance of an FCA controlled function, the details of the outsourcing determine where responsibility lies and whom the FCA anticipates will submit FCA-approved persons application forms. SUP 10A.13.6G describes some common situations. The firm which is outsourcing is referred to as “A” and the person to whom the performance of the FCA controlled function has been outsourced, or which makes the arrangement for the FCA controlled function to be performed, is referred to as “B”. In each situation, A must take reasonable care to ensure that, in accordance with section 59(2) of the Act, no person performs an FCA controlled function under an arrangement entered into by its contractor in relation to the

FCA 2018/XX carrying on by A of a regulated activity, without approval from the FCA. See also SYSC 8.1.1R. [deleted] 10A.13.6 G Outsourcing arrangements [deleted] Outsourcing arrangements Submitting form Firm A to firm B The FCA will consider A to have taken reasonable care if it enters into a contract with B under which B is responsible for ensuring that the relevant FCA controlled functions are performed by FCAapproved persons, and that it is reasonable for A to rely on this Firm B submits FCAapproved persons forms on behalf of firm A Outsourcing by A to B (both being a member of the same United Kingdom group and each having its registered office in the United Kingdom) See SUP 10A.3.4G See SUP 15.7.8G (i) A to B, where B is a non-authorised person not part of the same group as A (ii) A to B, where A is a branch of an overseas firm in the United Kingdom, and B is an overseas undertaking of the same group (iii) A to B, where A is a UK authorised subsidiary of an overseas firm and B is an overseas undertaking of the same group Responsibility for (as opposed to the performance of) any activity outsourced to B will remain with A. See SYSC 8 A ensures that an individual approved by the FCA under a controlled function that is a significant-influence function has responsibility for the outsourced arrangement and A submits a form in relation to that individual

FCA 2018/XX
…
10A.14 Changes to an FCA-approved person’s details Moving within a firm … 10A.14.4 D (1) A firm must use Form E where an approved person is both ceasing to perform one or more controlled functions and needs to be approved in relation to one or more FCA controlled functions within in relation to the same firm or in relation to a firm in the same group. (2) A firm must not use Form E if:
…
(c) any of the following apply (where applicable):
…
(ii) … in relation to any:
(iii) …
… (iv) controlled function that they are continuing to perform for in relation to that firm or a firm in the same group. … 10A.14.4A G (1) The MiFID authorisation and management body change notification ITS requires that MiFID investment firms (except credit institutions) submit the Annex III information on the ESMA template available at https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/forms/mifid-changesmanagement-body-form.docx (‘Annex III template’) where there is a change to a member of the management body or a person who effectively directs the business. (2) MiFID investment firms (except credit institutions) need to submit this Annex III template within ten business days of the change in the online notification and application system (also known as Connect). (3) SUP 10A.14.4BD explains how this requirement fits in with the requirement to submit a Form A or Form E. [deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
10C.14.4AA G (1) The MiFID authorisation and management body change notification ITS requires that a person applying to be a MiFID investment firm (except a credit institution) notify the appropriate regulator of information about members of its management body by filling in the template set out in Annex II of the MiFID authorisation and management body change notification ITS. (2) This applies whether:
(a) the person is applying for authorisation; or (b) the person is a firm applying for a variation of its permission that would turn it into a MiFID investment firm. (3) The requirement in SUP 10A.14.4BD to fill in the MiFID
Article 4 SMR Information Form along with a Form A or Form
E does not apply. [deleted]
10A.14.4B D Where:
(1) there is a change to a member of the management body or person who directs the business, of a MiFID investment firms (except a credit institutions) that the firm must notify to the appropriate regulator under Annex III of the MiFID authorisation and management body change notification ITS; (2) that change also requires the firm to apply for approval for that member or person to perform an FCA-designated senior management function; the firm must submit to the FCA the completed form found in SUP 10A
Annex 10D (MiFID Article 4 SMR Information Form) at the same time
as submitting the Form A and/or or Form E about the candidate. [deleted] 10A.14.4C G MiFID investment firms (except credit institutions) who submit:
(1) Form A and/or E; and
(2) the MiFID Article 4 SMR Information Form about a candidate can complete the Annex III template outlined in SUP 10A.14.4AG(1) by cross-referring to any information required by the template that has been included in the relevant Form A or Form E . The template should be annexed to the relevant Form A or Form E. [deleted] …

FCA 2018/XX
Moving between firms
10A.14.6 G If it is proposed that an FCA-approved person will no longer be performing an FCA controlled function under an arrangement entered into by one firm or one of its contractors the appointed representative of one principal, but will be performing the same or a different FCA controlled function under an arrangement entered into by a new firm or one of its contractors the appointed representative of a new principal (whether or not the new firm principal is in the same group as the old firm principal and whether or not the appointed representative is the same), the new firm principal will be required to make a fresh application for the performance of the FCA controlled function by that person. … Ceasing to perform an FCA controlled function 10A.14.8 R … (2) If:
(a) the firm is also making an application for approval for that approved person to perform a controlled function within in relation to the same firm or a firm in the same group; and … … 10A.14.9A G (1) The MiFID authorisation and management body change notification ITS requires that a MiFID investment firm (except a credit institution) submit the information in Annex III of the MiFID authorisation and management body change notification ITS on the ESMA template where there is a change to a member of the management body or a person who effectively directs the business. (2) This means that a MiFID investment firm required to notify the FCA under (1) may also need to submit the Annex III information along with the Form C or Form E. [deleted] 10A.14.10 R (1) A firm must notify the FCA as soon as practicable after it becomes aware, or has information which reasonably suggests, that it will submit a qualified Form C in respect of an FCAapproved person. (2) Form C is qualified if the information it contains:

FCA 2018/XX
(a) relates to the fact that the firm or the appointed representative has dismissed, or suspended, the FCAapproved person from its employment; or (b) relates to the resignation by the FCA-approved person while under investigation by the firm, the appointed representative, the FCA or any other regulatory body; or (c) otherwise reasonably suggests that it may affect the FCA’s assessment of the FCA-approved person’s fitness and propriety. … 10A.14.13 G A firm can submit Form C or Form E and the MiFID Article 4 APER Information Form to the FCA in advance of the cessation date. When a person ceases the arrangement under which they perform an FCA controlled function, they will automatically cease to be an FCAapproved person in relation to that FCA controlled function. A person can only be an FCA-approved person in relation to a specific FCA controlled function. Therefore, a person is not an FCA-approved person during any period between ceasing to perform one FCA controlled function (when they are performing no other FCA controlled function) and being approved in respect of another FCA controlled function. … Changes to an approved person’s personal details 10A.14.15 R If an FCA-approved person’s title, name or national insurance number changes, the firm for which the person performs an FCA controlled function authorised approved person employer must notify the FCA on Form D (SUP 10C Annex 6R) of that change within seven business days of the firm becoming aware of the matter. … 10A.14.21 G (1) If, in relation to a firm which has completed the relevant Form A (SUP 10A Annex 4D) (SUP 10C Annex 3D), any of the details relating to arrangements and FCA controlled functions are to change, the firm must notify the FCA on Form D (SUP 10C Annex 6R). … … 10A.15 References and accurate information References

FCA 2018/XX
10A.15.1 G (1) SYSC 22 (Regulatory references) says that if a firm (A):
(a) is considering appointing a person (P) to perform any controlled function or certain other functions; (b) requests a reference from a firm (B) that is P’s current or former employer; and (c) indicates to B the purpose of the request; B should, as soon as reasonably practicable, give a reference to A. (2) This applies even if A is a firm to which SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms)) applies rather than this chapter. [deleted] … (4) SYSC 22.8.3R and SYSC 22.8.4R (Appointed representatives) say that this applies to B’s appointed representatives as well as to B. … The need for complete and accurate information 10A.15.4 G The obligations to supply information to the FCA under either SUP 10A.14.8R or SUP 10A.14.10R apply notwithstanding any agreement (for example a ‘COT 3’ Agreement settled by the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (ACAS)) or any other arrangements entered into by a firm or its appointed representative and an employee upon termination of the employee’s employment. A firm should not (and should ensure that its appointed representatives do not) enter into any such arrangements or agreements that could conflict with its obligations under this section. … 10A.16 How to apply for approval and give notifications 10A.16.1 D (1) This direction applies to an application under Form A or Form E. (2) Subject to (2A), an An application by a firm must be made by submitting the Form online at fca.org.uk using the form specified on the FCA’s and PRA’s online notification and application system in accordance with the requirements in SUP 10C.15 (Forms and other documents and how to submit them to the FCA) about the submission of those Forms.

FCA 2018/XX
(2A) An application by a firm whose application for permission or whose Part 4A permission covers only credit-related regulated activities must be made using the form in SUP 10A Annex 4 or SUP 10A Annex 8 and must be submitted in the way set out in SUP 15.7.4 R to SUP 15.7.9G (Form and method of notification). [deleted] … (4) Where a firm is obliged to submit an application online under (2), if the information technology systems used by the FCA fail and online submission is unavailable for 24 hours or more, until such time as facilities for online submission are restored a firm must use the form in SUP 10A Annex 4D or SUP 10A Annex 8D and submit it in the way set out in SUP 15.7.4R to SUP 15.7.9G (Form and method of notification). [deleted] (5) An application by a firm in relation to a controlled function to which SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representative of an SMCR firm) applies must be made in accordance with SUP 10C.15 (Forms and other documents and how to submit them to the FCA) and not this section. [deleted] 10A.16.2 R (1) This rule applies to a notification under Form B, Form C or Form D. (2) A notification must be made in accordance with SUP 10A.16.1D, except that the annexes in which the forms are to be found are SUP 10C Annex 5R or SUP 10C Annex 6R, rather than the Annexes mentioned in SUP 10A.16.1D the requirements in SUP 10C.15 (Forms and other documents and how to submit them to the FCA) about the submission of those Forms. (3) A notification by a firm in relation to a controlled function to which SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representative of an SMCR firm) applies must be made in accordance with SUP 10C.15 (Forms and other documents and how to submit them to the FCA) and not this section. [deleted] 10A.16.2A R SUP 10A.16.2R(3) rule also applies to Form B in relation to a controlled function to which SUP 10A.1.16BR (appointed representative of an SMCR firm) applies. [deleted] 10A.16.3 G If the information technology systems used by the FCA fail and online submission is unavailable for 24 hours or more, the FCA and PRA will endeavour to publish a notice on their websites confirming that online submission is unavailable and that the alternative methods of submission set out in SUP 10A.16.1D(4) and SUP 15.7.4R to SUP 15.7.9G (Form and method of notification) should be used. [deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
10A.16.4 G Where SUP 10A.16.1D(4) or the equivalent situation under SUP 10A.16.2R applies to a firm, GEN 1.3.2R (Emergency) does not apply. [deleted] 10A.17 Further questions [deleted] 10A.17.1 G A list of frequently asked questions and answers is at SUP 10A Annex 1. 10A.17.2 G If the firm or its advisers have further questions, they should contact the FCA’s Contact Centre (see SUP 10A.12.6G). … Delete the following Annexes. The deleted text of each Annex is not shown. 10A Annex 1G Frequently asked questions [deleted] 10A Annex 2G Approved persons regime: summary of forms and their use for applications for approval to perform an FCA-controlled function [deleted] 10A Annex 4D Form A: Application to perform controlled functions under the approved person regime [deleted] 10A Annex 8D Form E: Internal transfer of an approved person [deleted] Amend the following as shown. 10C FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms … 10C.1 Application …

FCA 2018/XX
Appointed representatives
10C.1.7 R This chapter does not deal with an approved person who is approved under SUP 10A.1.16BR (Appointed representatives) SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives). 10C.1.8 G (1) SUP 10A.1.15R to SUP 10A.1.16DG (Appointed representatives) deal SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives) deals with the approved persons regime for appointed representatives of SMCR firms. … (5) Both this chapter and SUP 10A deal with an appointed representative that has a limited permission to carry on a regulated activity prescribed for the purposes of section 39(1E)(a) of the Act. … 10C.3 General material about the definition of controlled functions … Types of controlled function … 10C.3.4 G The FCA has (in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives)) specified controlled functions for SMCR firms that are not designated senior management functions. (See SUP 10C.1.7R to SUP 10C.1.8G (Appointed representatives)). … 10C.4 Specification of functions … 10C.4.3 R Table of FCA-designated senior management functions for SMCR firms Type SMF Description of FCA controlled function FCA governing functions SMF 1 Chief executive function SMF 3 … SMF 7 Group entity senior manager function

FCA 2018/XX
SMF 9 Chair of the governing body function SMF 10 Chair of the risk committee function SMF 11 Chair of the audit committee function SMF 12 Chair of the remuneration committee function SMF 13 … SMF 14 Senior independent director function SMF 15 … SMF 19 Head of third country branch function SMF 27 … FCA required functions … … SMF 23b … SMF 29 Limited scope function Other high-level management functions SMF 21 … Systems and controls functions SMF 2 Chief finance officer function SMF 4 Chief risk officer function SMF 5 Head of internal audit function SMF 24 Chief operations function 10C.4.4 G As described in SUP 10C.1.7R to SUP 10C.1.8G (Appointed representatives), SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives) specifies certain other controlled functions for SMCR firms. … 10C.4A FCA governing functions: General 10C.4A.1 G … Sole traders

FCA 2018/XX
10C.4A.2 G (1) An individual sole trader themselves will not need approval to perform any of the governing functions. Therefore the governing functions do not apply to a sole trader with no employees. (2) It is possible, although perhaps not likely in practice, that the governing functions could apply to staff working for the sole trader. (3) In particular, it is possible for the sole trader to give sufficient authority to a staff member that the staff member meets the Glossary definition of a director. (4) This might happen, for example, if the sole trader’s business is so large that the sole trader sets up a governing body to run it. 10C.5 FCA governing functions: Executive … Executive director function: Adjustment of definition for non-directive friendly societies 10C.5.9 R … (3) The term director also includes:
(a) each person on the firm’s governing body; and (b) (in the case of an FCA-authorised firm) the chief executive. …
10.5.10 G …
(3) The individual in (2) may, for example, have the title of chief executive or similar. The individual would (subject to SUP 10C.5.11G) have to be an FCA-approved person under SUP 10C.5.9R. 10C.5.11 G (1) In practice, the FCA expects that most non-directive friendly societies will be PRA-authorised persons. (2) Where that is the case, the executive director function will often not apply (see SUP 10C.4A.1G). ... 10C.5.18 G …

FCA 2018/XX
Partner function: When partners and members do not require approval 10C.5.19 R (1) This rule applies to an SMCR firm that is an FCA-authorised person to which the partner function applies. (2) If the principal purpose of the firm is to carry on one or more regulated activities, each person in SUP 10C.5.14R to SUP 10C.5.16R (a “partner”) performs the partner function. (3) If the principal purpose of the firm is other than to carry on regulated activities:
(a) a partner performs the partner function to the extent only that they have responsibility for a regulated activity; and (b) a partner in a firm will be taken to have responsibility for each regulated activity except where the firm has apportioned responsibility to another partner or group of partners. 10C.5.20 G (1) This paragraph SUP 10C.5.20G describes some of the combined effects of SUP 10C Annex 1 2.1R and SUP 10C.5.19R. (2) A partner whose only regulated activities are incidental to their professional services, in a firm whose principal purpose is to carry on other than regulated activities, need not be an FCAapproved person. (3) What amounts to the principal purpose of the firm is a matter of fact in each case having regard to all the circumstances, including the activities of the firm as a whole. (4) Any regulated activities which such a partner carries on are not within the description of the partner function. Chief executive function (SMF1) 10C.5.21 R (1) The chief executive function is the function of acting in the capacity of a chief executive of a firm. (2) This function does not apply to a non-directive friendly society. 10C.5.22 G This function is having the responsibility, alone or jointly with one or more others, under the immediate authority of the governing body for the conduct of the whole of the business (or relevant activities) of the firm. 10C.5.23 G (1) A person performing the chief executive function may be a member of the governing body but need not be.

FCA 2018/XX
(2) If the chairman of the governing body is also the chief executive, they will be discharging this function. (3) If the responsibility is divided between more than one person but not shared, there is no person exercising the chief executive function. (4) But if that responsibility is discharged jointly by more than one person, each of those persons will be performing the chief executive function. Head of third country branch function (SMF 19) 10C.5.24 R (1) This rule applies to an overseas SMCR firm. (2) The head of third country branch function is the function of having responsibility alone or jointly with others, for the conduct of all activities of the United Kingdom branch of the firm which are subject to the UK regulatory system. 10C.5A FCA governing functions: Oversight … 10C.5A.6 R … Chair of the governing body function (SMF9) 10C.5A.7 R The chair of the governing body function is the function of having responsibility for chairing, and overseeing the performance of the role of, the governing body of the firm. Chair of the risk committee function (SMF10) 10C.5A.8 R The chair of the risk committee function is the function of having responsibility for chairing, and overseeing the performance of, any committee responsible for the oversight of the risk management systems, policies and procedures of the firm, including where applicable to the firm, a committee established in accordance with the risk control requirements for SMCR firms. Chair of the audit committee function (SMF11) 10C.5A.9 R The chair of the audit committee function is the function of having responsibility for chairing, and overseeing the performance of, any committee responsible for the oversight of the internal audit system of the firm including where applicable to the firm, a committee established in accordance with the internal audit requirements for SMCR firms.

FCA 2018/XX
Chair of the remuneration committee function (SMF12) 10C.5A.10 R The chair of the remuneration committee function is the function of having responsibility for chairing, and overseeing the performance of, any committee responsible for the oversight of the design and the implementation of the remuneration policies of a firm, including where applicable to the firm, a committee established in accordance with:
(1) SYSC 19A.3.12R (Remuneration Principle 4: Governance); (2) SYSC 19B.1.9R (AIFM Remuneration Principle 3:
Governance);
(3) SYSC 19C.3.12 R (Remuneration Principle 4: Governance); (4) SYSC 19D.3.12R (Remuneration Principle 4: Governance); (5) SYSC 19E.2.9R (UCITS Remuneration Principle 3:
Governance).
Senior independent director function (SMF14) 10C.5A.11 R The senior independent director function is the function of performing the role of a senior independent director, and having particular responsibility for leading the assessment of the performance of the person performing the chair of the governing body function. 10C.5B FCA governing functions: Group entities Group entity senior manager function (SMF7) 10C.5B.1 R (1) The group entity senior manager function is the function of having a significant influence on the management or conduct of one or more aspects of the affairs of a firm in relation to its regulated activities. (2) This controlled function does not include having such influence in the course of performance of another designated senior management function for that firm. (3) This controlled function only applies if it is performed by:
(a) a person employed by; or
(b) an officer of:
any of the following:
(c) a parent undertaking or holding company of the firm; or

FCA 2018/XX
(d) another undertaking which is a member of the firm’s group. Basis on which group entity senior manager function is included 10C.5B.2 G (1) This provision explains the basis on which the group entity senior manager function is included as a controlled function. (2) The basic position is set out in SUP 10C.3.9G. As is the case with all controlled functions in this chapter, the definition of the group entity senior manager function is subject to the overriding provisions in SUP 10C.3.6R, which sets out the requirements of section 59(1) and (2) of the Act. (3) This means that unless the firm has an arrangement permitting the performance of these roles by the persons concerned, these persons will not be performing the group entity senior manager function. (4) Therefore, the FCA accepts that there will be cases in which a person performing the role described in SUP 10C.5B.1R will not require approval. (5) However where there is such an arrangement the function may apply. When the group entity senior manager function applies 10C.5B.3 G (1) Individuals in the management of a group in which a firm is a subsidiary do not automatically come within the group entity senior manager function because their job relates to the firm. (2) The FCA does not aim or expect to approve individuals to perform this function for every firm to which the function potentially applies under SUP 10C Annex 1 (What functions apply to what type of firm) just because the firm is part of a group. (3) The FCA would not consider it to be unusual for there to be no one performing the group entity senior manager function for a firm that is a subsidiary in a group. 10C.5B.4 G Whether someone performs the group entity senior manager function should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The factors to be taken into account include:
(1) the organisational structures of the group and the firm; (2) the split of key responsibilities between the group and firm boards and senior management; and

FCA 2018/XX
(3) whether SMF managers based in the firm have an appropriate level of authority within the group to ensure that the firm complies with the requirements of the regulatory system. 10C.5B.5 G (1) An individual based elsewhere in a group whose responsibilities in relation to a subsidiary in the group that is a firm are limited to developing the group’s overall strategy is unlikely to be performing the group entity senior manager function. (2) The function is more likely to apply to individuals who are directly responsible for implementing the group’s strategy in the firm. (3) Therefore, if an individual based elsewhere in the group:
(a) is directly responsible for taking decisions about how the firm should conduct its regulated activities; and (b) has not delegated this responsibility to an SMF manager based in the firm; it is likely that they will require approval to perform the group entity senior manager function (or, as described in SUP 10C.5B.6G, another designated senior management function). (4) If however the firm’s governing body has sufficient discretion in how it applies and responds to proposals coming from group committees or individuals based in parent entities, approval would generally not be required. In this case the individual will be carrying on a group-level function rather than performing a function on behalf of the firm. (5) So, where:
(a) a firm has in place the required SMF managers based in the firm; and (b) those SMF managers are effective and have sufficient control over the firm; the FCA would not routinely expect the firm to have persons performing the group entity senior manager function in place. 10C.5B.6 G (1) SUP 10C.5B.1R(2) means that an individual who is approved to perform another designated senior management function for a firm will often not need to be approved to perform the group entity senior manager function for that firm as well. (2) So for example if the individual has responsibility for the firm’s finances they may be performing the chief finance officer function. If that is the case the individual will not be performing

FCA 2018/XX the group entity senior manager function by carrying out the functions of a chief finance officer. (3) Similarly an individual who is approved to perform another designated senior management function for the firm may have influence that comes from holding that post in matters falling outside the core duties of that post. For example a chief finance officer of a firm will have important input into decisions that fall outside the core financial control function. That influence does not mean that they are performing the group entity senior manager function. 10C.5B.7 G The group entity senior manager function is potentially relevant:
(1) whether the individual is located in or outside the United Kingdom; and (2) whether the group is headquartered in the United Kingdom or overseas. 10C.5B.8 G (1) The parent of a subsidiary firm cannot itself perform the group entity senior manager function. (2) A shareholder in the parent will also not perform this function unless the shareholder is also a director, officer or employee of the parent and is exerting significant influence over the firm through that role. 10C.6 FCA-required functions Compliance oversight function (SMF16) 10C.6.1 R The compliance oversight function is the function of acting in the capacity of a person who is allocated the function in:
…
(4) SYSC 6.1.4CR; or
(5) SYSC 3.2.8R . ; or
(6) (for a full-scope UK AIFM) article 61(3)(b) of the AIFMD level 2 regulation. … 10C.6.4 R … Limited scope function (SMF29)

FCA 2018/XX
10C.6.5 R The limited scope function is the function of acting in the capacity of a person responsible for the apportionment function and/or the oversight function set out in SYSC 4.4.5R. 10C.6.6 G The fact that there is a person performing the limited scope function, and who has responsibility for activities subject to regulation by the FCA, may have a bearing on whether a manager who is based overseas will be performing an FCA controlled function. It is a factor to take into account when assessing the likely influence of the overseas manager. 10C.6A Systems and controls functions: Finance, risk and internal audit Introduction 10C.6A.1 G The FCA-designated senior management functions in this section apply even if the firm:
(1) is not required by the regulatory system to allocate any of these roles to someone; or (2) is not subject to any requirements of the regulatory system dealing with the management of the matters referred to in SUP 10C.6A.3R to SUP 10C.6A.6R. Seniority 10C.6A.2 G The FCA expects a firm to ensure that a person performing a function in this section for a firm has sufficient expertise and authority to perform that function effectively. A director or senior manager would meet this expectation. Chief finance officer function (SMF2) 10C.6A.3 R The chief finance officer function is the function of having responsibility for management of the financial resources of the firm, including reporting directly to the governing body of the firm in relation to its financial affairs. Chief risk officer function (SMF4) 10C.6A.4 R The chief risk officer function is the function of having responsibility for overall management of the risk controls of a firm, including:
(1) the setting and managing of the firm’s risk exposures; and (2) reporting directly to the governing body of the firm in relation to its risk management arrangements.

FCA 2018/XX
10A.6A.5 G (1) Risk controls systems include ones designed to deal with the kinds of matters in the risk control requirements for SMCR firms. (2) However SUP 10C.6A.4R applies even if the provisions in (1) do not apply to the firm. Head of internal audit function (SMF5) 10C.6A.6 R The head of internal audit function is the function of having responsibility for management of the internal audit function of the firm, including reporting directly to the governing body of the firm on the internal audit function. 10A.6A.7 G (1) Internal audit covers the kinds of matters in the internal audit requirements for SMCR firms. (2) However SUP 10C.6A.6R applies even if the provisions in (1) do not apply to the firm. 10C.6B Systems and controls functions: Other Seniority 10C.6B.1 G The FCA expects a firm to ensure that a person performing a function in this section for a firm has sufficient expertise and authority to perform that function effectively. A director or senior manager would meet this expectation. The chief operations function (SMF24) 10C.6B.2 R (1) The chief operations function is the function of having overall responsibility for managing all or substantially all the internal operations or technology of the firm or of a part of the firm. (2) A person has overall responsibility for managing all or substantially all the matters described in (1) for the purposes of this rule even if one or more other persons have responsibility for:
(a) the matters to which the internal audit requirements for SMCR firms, the compliance requirements for SMCR firms or the risk control requirements for SMCR firms relate; or (b) the matters to which any of the required functions relate; or

FCA 2018/XX
(c) any part of the firm responsible for advising other parts of the firm. (3) (2) applies to a firm whether or not the requirements in (2)(a) or the functions in (2)(b) apply to it. (4) The chief operations function does not include the function of acting in the capacity of a chief executive of a firm. (5) A person (P) does not perform the chief operations function by managing the internal operations or technology of a part of a firm that carries out other functions (such as a part of the firm that carries on regulated activities with clients) as part of P’s function of managing that part of the firm. 10C.6B.3 G (1) In SUP 10C.6B.2R technology refers principally to the firm’s information and communications technology (ICT) systems and services. (2) Those services include but may not be necessarily limited to the mechanisms and networks that support the operations of a firm, including data entry, data storage, data processing and reporting services, but also monitoring, business and decision support services. 10C.6B.4 G The chief operations function may include but not necessarily be limited to areas such as:
(1) business continuity (including responsibility for compliance with SYSC 4.1.6R and SYSC 4.1.7R (Business continuity), if those rules apply to the firm); (2) cybersecurity; (3) information technology; (4) internal operations; (5) operational continuity, resilience and strategy; (6) outsourcing, procurement and vendor management; and (7) management of services shared with other group members. 10C.6B.5 G If:
(1) a firm does not have anyone who performs the chief operations function; but (2) SYSC 26 (Senior managers and certification regime: Overall and local responsibility) applies to the firm;

FCA 2018/XX the firm should allocate responsibility for the functions in SUP 10C.6B.4G among its SMF managers under SYSC 26. 10C.6B.6 G If a firm is required to have a management responsibilities map, the map should include the functions in SUP 10C.6B.4G, whether or not the firm has someone who performs the chief operations function. 10C.6B.7 G The table in SUP 10C.6B.8G gives examples of how the chief operations function applies. 10C.6B.8 G Table: Examples of how the chief operations function applies Example Comments (1) Firm A has the following three individuals.

Chief Operating Officer
(COO);
Chief Information &
Technology Officer (CITO);
Head of Human Resources
(Head of HR).
The Head of HR and the
CITO report to the COO.
The COO is the only person performing the chief operations function. (2) Firm A has the following two individuals:
Chief Operating Officer
(COO);
Chief Information and
Technology Officer (CITO).
The COO and CITO are equally senior. Both have separate reporting lines to the Board and the CEO. Overall responsibility for information technology is shared between the COO and CITO. The COO has overall responsibility for all other internal operations. Both individuals perform the chief operations function. (3) Firm A has two business lines (broking and advice). It B, C and D perform the chief operations function.

FCA 2018/XX has the following individuals:

a Chief Operating Officer
responsible for the internal operations of the broking business (other than technology) (B)
a Chief Information and
Technology Officer for the broking business (C)
an individual who
combines the roles of Chief
Operating Officer and Chief
Information and Technology
Officer for the advice business (D).
B, C and D are equally senior. They all have separate reporting lines to the Board and the CEO. (4) Firm A splits overall responsibility for its internal operations between various individuals. A separate individual is responsible for human resources, business continuity, procurement and outsourcing, buildings and the remaining parts of internal operations. Firm A also has a Chief Information & Technology Officer (CITO) with responsibility for all the firm’s technology. Each individual is equally senior. The CITO performs the chief operations function. None of the others perform the chief operations function. This is because none of them has responsibility for the firm’s internal operations as a whole or for all the internal operations of a part of the business. Firm A has divided the responsibility based on function rather than business line. However those others may be performing the other overall responsibility function. (5) Firm A has a Chief Operating Officer (B) responsible for its internal operations. However Firm A separates its internal advisory functions (such as economic and market analysis) and allocates them to C. B performs the chief operations function. C does not. The same answer would apply if C’s functions were split between several others.

FCA 2018/XX
(6) Firm A has a Chief
Operating Officer (B). B does not report to the firm’s governing body. B reports to several directors about different aspects of B’s job, who in turn report to the governing body. B does not perform the chief operations function. B does not have overall responsibility for internal operations as B does not have direct responsibility to the governing body. SYSC 26.7 (Meaning of local and overall responsibility: Reporting to the governing body) is relevant to the meaning of overall responsibility in this context. The directors to whom B reports do not perform the chief operations function either, for the reasons in Example (4). (7) Firm A has two business lines (broking and advice). B is chief executive of the broking division and C is chief executive of the advisory division. Each chief executive is responsible for the internal operations and IT of their division. Both B and C report to the Board. SUP 10C.6B.2R(5) means that neither B nor C performs the chief operations function. 10C.7 Other overall responsibility function (SMF18) Application … 10C.7.1-1 G The effect of SUP 10C.7.1-2R is that this section only applies to one of the following types of UK SMCR firm:
(1) an SMCR banking firm; and
(2) a Solvency II firm (including a large non-directive insurer) but excluding an insurance special purpose vehicle and certain firms in run-off; and (3) an enhanced scope SMCR firm. Definition

FCA 2018/XX
10C.7.1 R A person performs the other overall responsibility function in relation to a firm if that person:
(1) is performing:
(a) a function allocated to that person under SYSC 26.3.1R (Main rules) in relation to the firm; or (b) FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility (z) in the table in SYSC 24.2.5R (functions in relation to CASS) allocated to that person under SYSC 24.2 (Allocation of FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities: Main allocation rules); and or (c) (if the firm has allocated such a function to someone) the function of having overall responsibility for any of the activities, business areas and management functions of the firm excluded from SYSC 26.3 (Main rules) by SYSC 26.4.11R (Exclusion for AIFMD); and (2) does not have an approval to perform any other designated senior management function in relation to the firm. … 10C.7.3 G Table: Examples of how the other overall responsibility function applies Example Comments … … (7) ‘A’ is appointed to take on some functions that come within the other overall responsibility function. Later, A is appointed as chief risk officer. The firm is one of those for which being chief risk officer is a PRA-designated senior management function or an FCA-designated senior management function. On A’s first appointment, A will need to be approved to perform the other overall responsibility function. On being appointed as chief risk officer, A will stop performing the other overall responsibility function. … …

FCA 2018/XX
…
10C.8 The other local responsibility function (SMF22) and EEA branch senior manager functions (SMF21) … Other local responsibility function (SMF22) … 10C.8.3 G Table: Examples of how the other local responsibility function applies Example Comments (1) ‘A’ is allocated local responsibility for one of a branch’s main business lines. A is also appointed to perform a PRA-designated senior management function for the same branch. The firm is a PRA-authorised person. A only needs approval to perform the PRA-designated senior management function. … (3) A small branch undertakes two business lines (wholesale lending and corporate investments). ‘A’ is head of wholesale lending and is also an executive director of the branch. ‘B’ is head of corporate investments and does not sit on the branch management committee but reports to it on corporate investments. The branch allocates local responsibility for these functions to A and B. Neither A nor B performs any other FCA-designated senior management function or (if the firm is a PRAauthorised person) PRAdesignated senior management function. A only needs approval to perform the executive director function. B needs approval to perform the other local responsibility function.

FCA 2018/XX
(4) A branch does not have a
Head of Internal Audit. ‘P’ is allocated local responsibility for internal audit in relation to that branch. P needs approval to perform the other local responsibility function. However, if P has already been approved to perform another FCAdesignated senior management function or (if the firm is a PRAauthorised person) PRA-designated senior management function, then P will not be performing the other local responsibility function. … (8) ‘A’ is appointed to take on some functions that come within the other local responsibility function. Later, A is appointed as chief risk officer. A is a type of firm for which being chief risk officer is a PRA designated senior management function or an FCA-designated senior management function. … … … 10C.9 Minimising overlap with the PRA approved persons regime Application 10C.9.1 -1 G This section only applies to a PRA-authorised person. … 10C.10 Application for approval and withdrawing an application for approval … How to apply for approval … 10C.10.9 D … (4) A firm must not use Form E if:

FCA 2018/XX
(a) a notification has been made or should be made:
(i) …
(ii) (if the firm is a PRA-authorised person) to the PRA under any equivalent PRA rule; or … (b) a notification has been made or should be made to the FCA or (if the firm is a PRA-authorised person) PRA under any of the following:
…
(c) (if the firm is a PRA-authorised person) a notification has been made or should be made to the PRA under any provision of the PRA Rulebook corresponding to the requirements in (b); or … … Criminal records checks and verifying fitness and properness 10C.10.16 R (1) This rule applies to an application by a firm for the FCA’s approval under section 59 of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) for the performance of an FCA-designated senior management function. (2) A firm must (as part of its assessment of whether a candidate is a fit and proper person to perform an FCA-designated senior management function and to verify the information contained in the application to carry out the FCA-designated senior management function) obtain the fullest information that it is lawfully able to obtain about the candidate under Part V of the Police Act 1997 (Certificates of Criminal records, etc) and related subordinated legislation of the UK or any part of the UK before making the application. (3) This rule does not apply to a firm that is a sole trader if the candidate is the sole trader themselves. … 10C.11 Statements of responsibilities … What this section covers

FCA 2018/XX
10C.11.2 G (1) …
(2) However, in the case of a PRA-authorised person, where applications and notifications relate both to FCA-designated senior management functions and to PRA ones, the regulators’ requirements are consistent with each other. … … Revised statements of responsibilities: Meaning of significant change 10C.11.6 G (1) … (2) A variation of the FCA-approved SMF manager’s approval, either at the firm’s request or at the FCA’s or (in the case of a PRA-authorised person), PRA’s initiative, resulting in the imposition, variation or removal of a condition or time limit, may involve a significant change. (3) … (4) The addition, re-allocation or removal of any of the following (or part of one):
(a) an FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility; (b) (in the case of a PRA-authorised person), a PRAprescribed senior management responsibility; or … (5) The sharing or dividing of an FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility or, in the case of a PRA-authorised person, a PRA-prescribed senior management responsibility, that was originally performed by one person between two or more persons may involve a significant change. (6) Ceasing to share an FCA-prescribed senior management responsibility or, in the case of a PRA-authorised person, a PRA-prescribed senior management responsibility, that was originally shared with another, or others, may involve a significant change. … Revised statements of responsibilities: Procedure 10C.11.7 D (1)

FCA 2018/XX
…
(3) Where In the case of a PRA-authorised person, where the change to be notified to the FCA under section 62A of the Act is
part of an arrangement under which:
…
…
One document for each SMF manager for each firm … 10C.11.14 G … (2) The (In the case of a PRA-authorised person), the document in (1) should cover PRA-designated senior management functions as well as FCA-designated senior management functions. … (4) The FCA and the PRA have coordinated their arrangements so that a firm PRA-authorised person can prepare a single document that will meet the requirements of both regulators about statements of responsibilities. … … Submitting statements of responsibilities: examples of how the requirements work 10C.11.18 G The table in SUP 10C.11.19G gives examples of how the requirements in this section for submitting statements of responsibilities (combined, in the case of a PRA-authorised person, with the corresponding PRA requirements) work in different cases. 10C.11.19 G Table: Examples of how the requirements for submitting statements of responsibilities work Example Comments … (3) A firm applies for approval for A to perform an FCA-designated senior management function and a PRA-designated senior management function. …

FCA 2018/XX
Example Comments
The arrangements in SUP 10C.9 for FCA functions to be absorbed into PRA ones do not apply and so there are separate applications to the FCA and PRA. The firm is a PRA-authorised person. … (5) A has approval to perform the executive director function. Later, A is to be appointed to perform the PRA’s chief risk officer designated senior management function for the same firm. This will also result in substantial changes to A’s duties as an executive director. The firm is a PRA-authorised person. … … (8) A has approval to perform the executive director function and the PRA’s chief risk officer designated senior management function for the same firm. The arrangements in SUP 10C.9 for FCA functions to be absorbed into PRA ones do not apply and so there are separate FCA and PRA approvals. The approval to perform the PRA’s chief risk officer designated senior management function is subject to a condition. The firm is applying to vary that condition. As part of the same arrangements, there are to be substantial changes to A’s job as an executive director. The firm is a PRA-authorised person. … (9) A has approval to perform the executive director function and the money laundering function for the same firm. Sometime later, A is to give up the money laundering function and take up the PRA’s chief risk officer designated senior management function. This will involve major changes to A’s role as executive director. The firm is a PRA-authorised person. …

FCA 2018/XX
Example Comments
…
(11) A has approval to perform the executive director function and the PRA’s chief risk officer designated senior management function for the same firm. Later, A gives up his role as chief risk officer. The firm is a PRA-authorised person. … … (14) A has approval to perform the executive director function. Later, A’s business unit grows in size and so the firm needs to apply for A to be approved to perform the PRA’s Head of Key Business Area designated senior management function. However, A’s responsibilities do not change. The firm is a PRA-authorised person. … … Need for a complete set of current statements of responsibilities … 10C.11.21 G (1) A complete set of current statement of responsibilities means all statements of responsibilities that the firm has provided to the FCA or (in the case of a PRA-authorised person), PRA as revised under section 62A of the Act and this chapter. … … What statements of responsibilities should contain: General … 10C.11.24 G (1) A statement of responsibilities (including its attachment sheet for additional information) should:
…

FCA 2018/XX
(c) only contain material about the matters that this chapter, the corresponding PRA requirements (in the case of a PRA-authorised person), and the Act say should be included in it. … … 10C.11.26 G … (2) For instance, these include:
(a) the responsibilities that go with the FCA required functions; and (b) the FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities and (in the case of a PRA-authorised person) the PRAprescribed senior management responsibilities. … … 10C.11.28 G (1) A statement of responsibilities of an SMF manager should include details about any:
(a) FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities and (in the case of a PRA-authorised person) PRAprescribed senior management responsibilities allocated to the SMF manager; (b) (in the case of a PRA-authorised person) functions that are included in a PRA controlled function under the arrangements described in SUP 10C.9 (Minimising overlap with the PRA approved persons regime); … … … 10C.12 Conditional and time-limited approvals Purpose 10C.12.1 G …

FCA 2018/XX
(3) The (In the case of a PRA-authorised person) the policies described in SUP 10C.12 also apply when the FCA is considering whether to give its consent to an application made to the PRA for approval. … 10C.12.2 G … (3) The FCA has (in SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives)) specified controlled functions for SMCR firms that are not designated senior management functions. See SUP 10C.1.7R to SUP 10C.1.8G (Appointed representatives) for more about this. … … 10C.13 Variation of conditional and time-limited approvals … Variation of a conditional approval at the request of the firm: general description … 10C.13.4 G (1) There are requirements about whether If the firm applying for a change described in SUP 10C.13.3G is a PRA-authorised person, there are requirements about whether it should apply to the FCA or the PRA. Paragraphs (2) to (3) summarise these requirements. … … 10C.14 Changes to an FCA-approved person’s details Moving within a firm 10C.14.1 G … (4) Similarly (in the case of a PRA-authorised person), a firm must get the FCA’s approval if an individual is to start performing an FCA-designated senior management function in relation to that firm when they already have the PRA’s approval to perform a PRA-designated senior management function in relation to that firm.

FCA 2018/XX
…
Notifications about fitness, disciplinary action and breaches of COCON … 10C.14.22 R … (5A) (in the case of a PRA-authorised person) under the PRA’s requirements corresponding to (4) or (5), if those requirements apply; or … … 10C.15 Forms and other documents and how to submit them to the FCA … How to make applications and give notifications 10C.15.7 D (1) A firm other than a credit union firm in (2) must submit a document in column 1 of the table in SUP 10C.15.10R, in accordance with the corresponding requirement in column two of that table. (2) A:
(a) credit union; or
(b) a firm whose Part 4A permission covers only creditrelated regulated activities; must submit a document in column 1 of the table in SUP 10C.15.10R, in accordance with the corresponding requirement in column three of that table. (3) … 10C.15.8 R … 10C.15.9 G It is up to the credit union firm referred to in SUP 10C.15.7D(2) concerned to decide which of the methods of submission available to it under SUP 10C.15.10R it is going to use. 10C.15.10 R Table: Method of submission

FCA 2018/XX
Form or other document
Firms that are not credit unions or consumer credit firms (SUP 10C.15.7D(1)) Credit unions and consumer credit firms (SUP 10C.15.7D(2)) … … 10C.16 References and accurate information References 10C.16.1 R (1) SYSC 22 (Regulatory references) says that if a firm (A):
(a) is considering appointing a person (P) to perform any controlled function or certain other functions; (b) requests a reference from a firm (B) that is P’s current or former employer; and (c) indicates to B the purpose of the request; B should, as soon as reasonably practicable, give a reference to A. (2) This applies even if A is a firm to which SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons) applies rather than this chapter. … 10C
Annex 1
What functions apply to what type of firm
Part One: Introduction
…
1.3 G …
(3) Another reason would be if the rules defining the FCA controlled function refer to a rule elsewhere in the Handbook and the latter only applies to certain types of firm. For example, SYSC 1 Annex 1 (Detailed application of SYSC) and SYSC 4.4 (Apportionment of responsibilities) cut back the application of the limited scope function.

FCA 2018/XX
(4) The exclusions in Part Two of this Annex and in SUP 10C.1 are also relevant. …
1.4 R In the tables in this annex:
(1) ✓ means that the FCA controlled function applies; (2) × means that the FCA controlled function does not apply;
Part Two: General exclusions
2.1 R (1) [This part has been left blank deliberately] This chapter, except in
respect of the FCA required functions, does not apply to an authorised professional firm that is an FCA-authorised person in respect of its non-mainstream regulated activities, subject to (2). (2) Where the authorised professional firm has appointed FCA-approved persons to perform the FCA governing functions with equivalent responsibilities for the firm’s non-mainstream regulated activities and other regulated activities, for the firm’s non-mainstream regulated activities this chapter applies with respect to the FCA governing functions and the FCA required functions only. … Insert the following new Parts in SUP 10C Annex 1 where indicated. The text is not underlined.
4.4 R …
Part Five: Functions applying to core firms
5.1 R (1) The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 5.2R sets out which FCA controlled
function applies to which type of core SMCR firm.
(2) Firms in (1) are divided into the following categories for the purposes of this rule:
(a) a UK SMCR firm not falling into (d); (b) an EEA SMCR firm; (c) an overseas SMCR firm not falling into (b); and (d) a UK SMCR firm falling into SYSC 23 Annex 1 6.4R (a firm exempt under MiFID whose only permission is bidding in emissions auctions).
5.2 R Table: Controlled functions applying to core SMCR firms

FCA 2018/XX
(1)
Brief description of function
(2)
Function number
(3)
UK firm
(4)
EEA firm
(5)
Other overseas firm
(6)
Emission auction bidder
Governing functions
Chief executive function SMF 1 ✓ × × ✓
Executive director function SMF 3 ✓ × ✓ ✓ Chair of the governing body function SMF 9 ✓ × × ✓ Head of third country branch function SMF 19 × × ✓ × Partner function SMF 27 ✓ × × ✓ Required functions Compliance oversight function SMF 16 ✓ × ✓ × Money laundering reporting function SMF 17 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Other high-level management functions EEA branch senior manager function SMF 21 × ✓ × × Note: The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in accordance with the classification of firms at SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R. Therefore:
(a) column three (UK firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(a); (b) column four (EEA firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(b); (c) column five (Other overseas firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(c); and (d) column six (Emission auction bidders) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 5.1R(2)(d).
Part Six: Functions applying to enhanced scope firms
6.1 R The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 6.2R sets out which FCA controlled functions
apply to an enhanced scope SMCR firm.

FCA 2018/XX
6.2 R Table: Controlled functions applying to enhanced scope SMCR firms
Brief description of function Function number Enhanced scope firms Governing functions Chief executive function SMF 1 ✓ Executive director function SMF 3 ✓ Group entity senior manager function SMF 7 ✓ Chair of the governing body function SMF 9 ✓ Chair of the risk committee function SMF 10 ✓ Chair of the audit committee function SMF 11 ✓ Chair of the remuneration committee function SMF 12 ✓ Chair of the nomination committee function SMF 13 ✓ Senior independent director function SMF 14 ✓ Partner function SMF 27 ✓ Required functions Compliance oversight function SMF 16 ✓ Money laundering reporting function SMF 17 ✓ Other overall responsibility function SMF 18 ✓ Systems and controls functions Chief finance officer function SMF 2 ✓ Chief risk officer function SMF 4 ✓

FCA 2018/XX
Head of internal audit function SMF 5 ✓
Chief operations function SMF 24 ✓
Part Seven: Functions applying to limited scope firms
7.1 R Limited scope SMCR firms are divided into the following categories for the
purposes of SUP 10C Annex 1:
(1) a firm falling within the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.4R that does not come within (2) to (4); (2) a firm falling within row (5) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.4R (distribution of non-investment insurance contracts); (3) a firm falling within SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.7R (credit firms with limited permission) except for one falling within (4); (4) a firm falling within SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.7R that is an appointed representative; (5) a sole trader who does not come within (1) to (4); (6) an authorised professional firm that does not come within (1) to (4); (7) a firm in the table in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.10R.
7.2 R A firm in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(7) does not fall into any other paragraph of
SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R.
7.3 R (1) The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.4R sets out which FCA controlled
functions apply to a limited scope SMCR firm covered by SUP 10C
Annex 1 7.1R(1), (2), (3) or (4).
(2) Part Two of that table applies to EEA SMCR firms.
(3) Part One of that table applies to other limited scope SMCR firms in (1).
7.4 R Table: Controlled functions applying to limited scope SMCR firms except
sole traders and authorised professional firms
Part One (UK and non-EEA)
(1)
Brief description of function
(2) (3)
General
(4) (5)

FCA 2018/XX
Function number
Insurance distribution and credit firms
Consumer credit appointed representatives Governing functions The governing functions that apply to core SMCR firms Various × × ✓ Required functions Compliance oversight function SMF 16 ✓ × × Money laundering reporting function SMF 17 ✓ × × Limited scope function SMF 29 ✓ ✓ ✓
Part Two (EEA firms)
(1)
Brief description of function
(2)
Function number
(3)
General
(4)
Insurance distribution and credit firms
(5)
Consumer credit appointed representatives Required functions Money laundering reporting function SMF 17 ✓ Note (3) Note (3) Notes to the table Note (1): The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in accordance with the classification of firms at SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R. Therefore:
(1) column three (General) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(1); (2) column four (Insurance distribution and credit firms) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(2) and SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(3); and (3) column five (Consumer credit appointed representatives) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(4). Note (2): SUP 10C Annex 1 7.3R sets out which part of the table applies to which firm. Note (3): Not applicable to these firms because SUP 10C Annex 1 7.2R means that the table does not apply to firms in this category.

FCA 2018/XX
7.5 R (1) This rule applies to a firm in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(4) (an
appointed representative that has a limited permission).
(2) The required functions apply in relation to the carrying on of the regulated activity for which it has limited permission. (3) The governing functions apply in relation to the carrying on of the regulated activity, for which it does not have permission, comprised in the business for which its principal has accepted responsibility. (4) If the appointed representative meets the conditions in SUP 10A.1.16R(2), only one of the governing functions applies under (3), as appropriate, to an individual within that appointed representative who will be required to be an FCA-approved person.
7.6 G The customer function also applies to a firm in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(4)
under SUP 10A (FCA Approved Persons in Appointed Representatives). Such a firm will need to read SUP 10A as well as this annex to find the complete list of controlled functions that apply to them.
7.7 R (1) The table in SUP 10C Annex 1 7.8R sets out which FCA controlled
functions apply to a limited scope SMCR firm that is covered by SUP 10C Annex 1 7.1R(5) or (6) (a sole trader or an authorised professional firm). (2) Firms in (1) are divided into the following categories for the purposes of this rule:
(a) a UK SMCR firm;
(b) an EEA SMCR firm; and
(c) an overseas SMCR firm not falling into (b).
7.8 R Table: Controlled functions applying to limited scope SMCR firms that are
sole traders or authorised professional firms (1) Brief description of function (2) Function number (3) UK firm (4) EEA firm (5) Other overseas firm Governing functions Chief executive function SMF 1 ✓ × × Executive director function SMF 3 ✓ × ✓

FCA 2018/XX
Chair of the governing body function SMF 9 ✓ × × Head of third country branch function SMF 19 × × ✓ Partner function SMF 27 ✓ × × Required functions Compliance oversight function SMF 16 ✓ × ✓ Money laundering reporting function SMF 17 ✓ ✓ ✓ Limited scope function SMF 29 ✓ × ✓ Other high-level management functions EEA branch senior manager function SMF 21 × ✓ × Note: The categories of firm in the column headings of this table are to be interpreted in accordance with the classification of firms at SUP 10C Annex 1 7.2R. Therefore:
(a) column three (UK firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.7R(2)(a); (b) column four (EEA firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.7R(2)(b); and (c) column five (Other overseas firm) refers to SUP 10C Annex 1 7.7R(2)(c).
7.9 R None of the FCA controlled functions apply to a limited scope SMCR firm in
the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 7.10R.
7.10 R Table: Limited scope SMCR firms to which no controlled functions apply
Function Comments
A firm in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.8R (not-forprofit debt advice body) A firm in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.10R (internally managed AIF) An EEA SMCR firm falling within row (5) of the table in SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.4R (distribution of non-investment insurance contracts) An EEA SMCR firm falling within SYSC 23
Annex 1 5.7R (credit firm with limited
permission)
This applies whether or not it is an appointed representative

FCA 2018/XX
7.11 G As explained in SUP 10C Annex 1 1.3G, the full range of FCA controlled
functions that are applied to a class of firm by this Annex may not apply to every firm in that class. For example, in the case of a limited scope SMCR firm that is a sole trader:
(1) In practice it is unlikely that the governing functions will apply to a sole trader (see SUP 10C.4A.2G). (2) The money laundering reporting function does not apply to a sole trader with no employees (see SYSC 6.3.9R). Amend the following as shown. 10C
Annex
2G
Summary of forms and their use in the senior managers regime Function Form Submission … (10) Person remaining with the same firm PRA-authorised person but giving up a PRA controlled function and taking up an FCAdesignated senior management function. E Submitted by firm to the FCA before changes take place. (11) Person remaining with the same firm PRA-authorised person but giving up an FCA-designated senior management function and taking up a PRA-designated senior management function. E Submitted by firm to the PRA before changes take place (see the PRA’s requirements). (12) Person remaining with the same firm PRA-authorised person in the circumstances described in example 9 in the table in SUP 10C.7.3G (ceasing to perform a PRA controlled function triggering need for FCA approval to perform the other overall responsibility function). E Submitted by firm to the FCA in advance of giving up the PRA controlled function. (13) Person with approval to perform the other overall responsibility function remaining with the same firm but ceasing to require approval to perform that function because of being approved to perform E Submitted by firm to:
(a) the PRA (if the new function is a PRA controlled function and

FCA 2018/XX another controlled function (see the table in SUP 10C.7.3G for examples). the firm is a PRA-authorised person); or (b) the FCA (if the new function is an FCA controlled function). (14) Person remaining with the same firm PRA-authorised person in the circumstances described in example 8 in the table in SUP 10C.9.9G (giving up a PRA controlled function triggering need for FCA approval). E Submitted by firm to the FCA in advance of giving up the PRA controlled function. … Insert the following annexes in the appropriate position. The text (which consists of forms) is included in Part Two of Annex Q of this instrument. 10C Annex 3D Form A: Application to perform senior management functions Long Form A – Solo regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Short Form A – Solo regulated firms (including EEA and third country) (The first form is to be inserted under the heading “Long Form A” and the second form is to be inserted under the heading “Short Form A”) 10C Annex 7D Form E: Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function Form E – Internal transfer of a person performing a controlled function for solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) 10C Annex 10D Statement of responsibilities Statement of responsibilities for solo-regulated SMCR firms Amend the following as shown. … 12 Appointed representatives …

FCA 2018/XX
12.6 Continuing obligations of firms with appointed representatives or EEA tied
agents
…
Obligations of firms under the approved persons and senior managers regime
12.6.8 G (1) Some of the controlled functions, as set out in SUP 10A.4.1R SUP
10A, apply to an appointed representative of a firm, other than an introducer appointed representative, just as they apply to a firm (see SUP 10A.1.15R). These are the governing functions and the customer function. In the case of an appointed representative that also has a limited permission, an FCA required designated senior management function may apply to it and SUP 10C may apply in addition to SUP 10A. As explained in SUP 10A.1.16R and SUP 10A.3.2G respectively:
(a) the effect of SUP 10A.1.15R is that the directors (or their equivalent) and senior managers (or their equivalent) of an appointed representative, other than an introducer appointed representative, must also be approved under section 59 of the Act for the performance of certain controlled functions; (b) although the customer function applies to an appointed representative, the descriptions of the functions themselves do not extend to home finance mediation activity, insurance distribution activity or credit-related regulated activity; (ba) if an appointed representative also has a limited permission:
(i) the apportionment and oversight function applies to it in relation to the carrying on of the regulated activity for which it has limited permission, unless it is a notfor-profit debt advice body; (ii) if it is a not-for-profit debt advice body and a CASS large debt management firm, the CASS operational oversight function applies in relation to the carrying on of debt management activity; and (c) sections 59(1) and 59(2) of the Act (Approval for particular arrangements) provide that approval is necessary in respect of a controlled function which is performed under an arrangement entered into by a firm, or its contractors (typically an appointed representative), in relation to a regulated activity. (2) The approved persons regime applies differently to an appointed representative whose scope of appointment includes insurance distribution activity in relation to non-investment insurance contracts or credit-related regulated activity but no other regulated activity

FCA 2018/XX and whose principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities. These appointed representatives need only one person performing one of the governing functions. This means that only one director (or equivalent) of these appointed representatives must be approved under section 59 of the Act for the performance of the director function, the chief executive function, the partner function or the director of unincorporated association function, whichever is the most appropriate (see SUP 10A.1.16R). [deleted] (3) The approved persons regime does not apply in relation to CBTL business carried on by CBTL firms. [deleted] (4) The approved persons regime for SMCR firms is in SUP 10C (FCA senior managers regime for approved persons in SMCR firms), rather than SUP 10A. However, SUP 10A still applies to approved persons of appointed representatives of SMCR firms (see SUP 10A.1.16BR to SUP 10A.1.16DG and SUP 10C.1.8G for more about this). [deleted] … 13A Qualifying for authorisation under the Act … 13A
Annex 1G
Application of the Handbook to Incoming EEA Firms … (1) Module of Handbook (2) Potential application to an incoming EEA firm with respect to activities carried on from an establishment of a firm (or its appointed representative) in the United Kingdom (3) Potential application to an incoming EEA firm with respect to activities carried on other than from an establishment of the firm (or its appointed representative) in the United Kingdom … … … APER APER applies to approved persons of appointed representatives of firms other than SMCR firms. See below under SUP 10A as to whether controlled functions are Not relevant because SUP 10A does not apply

FCA 2018/XX performed, and approval therefore required.
… … …
SUP … …
SUP 10A (Approved persons)
Applies to an EEA firm that has appointed representatives and is not an SMCR firm, but the applicable controlled functions are limited. See SUP 10A.1 (Application) for more detailed guidance. SUP 10A (Approved persons) Does not apply (SUP 10A.1.6R). … … … … … … 15 Notifications to the FCA …
15.11 Notification of COCON breaches and disciplinary action
…
Timing and form of notifications: conduct rules staff other than SMF managers
15.11.13 R …
(3) Each notification must:
(a) cover:
(i) (in the case of a firm falling within SYSC 23 Annex 1 5.7R (credit firms with limited permission)) its annual financial reporting period ending on its accounting reference date; or (ii) (for any other firm) the 12 month period ending on the last day of August; and (b) be submitted to the FCA:

FCA 2018/XX
(i) within two months of the end of the reporting period in (a)(i) or (a)(ii); or (ii) (if the end of the submission period in (b)(i) falls on a day which is not a business day) so as to be received no later than the first business day after the end of that submission period. … … TP 10 Benchmarks Regulation Transitional Provisions … (1) (2) Material to which the transitional provision applies (3) (4) Transitional provision (5) Transitio nal provision : dates in force (6) Handboo k provision : coming into force .. 2 SUP 10A.4.4R and SUP 10A.7.1.13R [deleted] R The rules in column 2, as they were on 28 June 2018, continue to apply to a benchmark administrator in relation to a specified benchmark until that administrator becomes authorised or registered under the benchmark regulation, or ceases to be authorised for administering a specified benchmark. From 29 June 2018 Already in force 3 SUP 10A.8.2R R The rule in column 2, as it was on 28 June 2018 continues to apply to a benchmark administrator in relation to a specified benchmark until that administrator becomes From 29 June 2018 Already in force

FCA 2018/XX authorised or registered under the benchmark regulation, or ceases to be authorised for administering a specified benchmark. …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex K
Amendments to the Dispute Resolution: Complaints sourcebook (DISP) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 1 Treating complainants fairly …
1.3 Complaints handling rules
…
1.3.7 R …
(4) A person approved to perform the apportionment and oversight function limited scope function for the firm or for a firm in the same group as the firm satisfies the condition in (3). …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex L
Amendments to the Credit Unions sourcebook (CREDS) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 2 Senior management arrangements, systems and controls …
2.2 General provisions
…
Governance and senior management arrangements: allocation of senior management responsibilities …
2.2.69 G (1) The list of FCA-prescribed senior management responsibilities that a
credit union should allocate is simpler than for most other SMCR firms who are PRA-authorised persons. … … 8 Supervision …
8.3 Approved persons
…
8.3.4 G (1) The regime for approved persons differs between applies to SMCR
firms and other types of firm.
(2) A credit union is a type of SMCR firm.
(3) SUP 10C deals with the approved persons requirements for credit unions and other SMCR firms. …
8.3.8 G …
(3) Designated senior management functions only apply to SMCR firms, including credit unions. [deleted]

FCA 2018/XX
…

FCA 2018/XX
Annex M
Amendments to the Energy Market Participants guide (EMPS) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 1 Special guide for energy market participants …
1.2 Parts of the Handbook applicable to energy market participants
…
1.2.3 G Applicability of parts of Handbook to energy market participants
This table belongs to EMPS 1.2.1G
Part of
Handbook
Applicability to energy market participants High Level Standards … … Code of Conduct (COCON) This does not apply applies. … … Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (APER) This applies to an approved person who performs a controlled function for If an energy market participant has an appointed representative, APER applies to approved persons in relation to that appointed representative. … … … … … Regulatory processes … … Supervision manual (SUP) This applies, with the following qualifications:

FCA 2018/XX
…
(b) in SUP 10 (Approved persons), if an oil market participant’s principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities, then the scope of the significant influence functions is restricted to the required functions: see SUP 10A.1.18R - SUP 10A.1.19G … … … … … … …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex N
Amendments to the Oil Market Participants guide (OMPS) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 1 Special guide for oil market participants …
1.2 Parts of the Handbook applicable to oil market participants
…
1.2.2 G Parts of the Handbook applicable to oil market participants
This table belongs to OMPS 1.2.1G
Part of
Handbook
Applicability to energy market participants High Level Standards … … Code of Conduct (COCON) This does not apply applies. … … Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (APER) This applies to an approved person who performs a controlled function for If an oil market participant has an appointed representative, APER applies to approved persons in relation to that appointed representative. … … … … … Regulatory processes … … Supervision manual (SUP) This applies, with the following qualifications:
…

FCA 2018/XX
(b) in SUP 10 (Approved persons), if an oil market participant’s principal purpose is to carry on activities other than regulated activities, then the scope of the significant influence functions is restricted to the required functions: see SUP 10A.1.18R - SUP 10A.1.19G … … … … … … …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex O
Amendments to the Service companies guide (SERV) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 1 Handbook requirements for service companies …
1.2 Parts of the Handbook applicable to service companies
…
1.2.2 G Parts of the Handbook applicable to service companies
This table belongs to SERV 1.2.1G
Part of
Handbook
Applicability to energy market participants High Level Standards … … Code of Conduct (COCON) This does not apply applies. … … Statements of Principle and Code of Practice for Approved Persons (APER) This applies to an approved person who performs a controlled function for If an service company has an appointed representative, APER applies to approved persons in relation to that appointed representative. … … … … … Regulatory processes … … Supervision manual (SUP) This applies, with the following qualifications:
…
(c) in SUP 10 (Approved persons), if a service company’s principal purpose is to

FCA 2018/XX carry on activities other than regulated activities, then the scope of the significant influence functions is restricted to the required functions: see SUP 10A.1.18R - SUP 10A.1.19G; … … … … … … …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex P
Amendments to General guidance on Benchmark Administration, Contribution and Use (BENCH) In this Annex, underlining indicates new text and striking through indicates deleted text. 1 Handbook requirements in relation to benchmark contribution activity and benchmark administration activity
1.1 Application and purpose
…
Benchmarks Regulation and transitional arrangements …
1.1.3 G …
(4)
(a) SYSC TP 6 and SYSC TP 7;
…
…
2 Parts of the Handbook applicable to regulated benchmark administrators and benchmark contributors
2.1 Parts of the Handbook applicable to regulated benchmark administrators
…
2.1.2 G Parts of the Handbook applicable to the regulated activity of administering a
benchmark.
Part of the
Handbook
Applicability to the regulated activity of administering a benchmark High Level Standards … Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and The detailed application of this is set out in SYSC 1 Annex 1. However, in general, only the following parts of SYSC will be relevant to a firm which only has permission to carry

FCA 2018/XX
Controls
(SYSC) on the regulated activity of administering a benchmark:
a) SYSC 1; b) SYSC 18.3.9G; c) SYSC 22 to SYSC 27.
…
Statements of
Principle and
Code of
Practice for
Approved
Persons
(APER)
This applies to an approved person of an appointed representative of a firm that is not an SMCR firm … … Regulatory Processes Supervision Manual (SUP) This applies subject to the following qualifications:
(a) In general only the following parts of SUP will be relevant to a firm which only has permission to carry on the regulated activity of administering a benchmark: SUP 1-2, SUP 5-8, SUP 9-10A, SUP 10C, SUP 15-15B, SUP 16.1-16.3 and SUP 16.10. (b) SUP 10A only applies to a regulated benchmark administrator which is not an SMCR firm (but not all controlled functions apply to a firm which only has permission to carry on the regulated activity of administering a benchmark). [deleted] (c) … … …

FCA 2018/XX
Annex Q
Handbook forms
All the text in this Annex is new and so it is not underlined. The forms are to be inserted in the place specified in paragraph F of the cover sheet of this instrument.
Part 1: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [about six months before main commencement date for
solo-regulated firms]

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 1 Application number (for FCA use only) Form K - Conversion Notification Form for FCA Solo Regulated Firms FCA Handbook Reference: SUP TP 10.23.1R [Commencement Date] Name of firm Firm Reference Number (FRN) Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square Stratford London E20 1JN United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0) 300 500 0597 E-mail firm.queries@fca.org.uk Website http://www.fca.org.uk Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No 1920623. Registered Office as above

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 2 Contact Details Section 1 Contact for this notification Title First name Surname Job title Business address Postcode Phone number Email address

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 3 Conversion Notification Section 2 This section should only be completed by enhanced scope SMCR firms (for CF2 to SMF9 conversion for core SMCR firms, see 2.02).
2.01 The table below provides a breakdown of possible applicable senior management functions for enhanced
SMCR firms only. Please tick all of the senior management functions which have been allocated in this conversion notification. Only those senior management functions potentially applicable to enhanced SMCR firms are listed. Core SMCR firms should use the table in 2.02 if applying for conversion where auto-conversion has not occurred. Function Description of senior management function Allocated? SMF 1 Chief Executive SMF 2 Chief Finance SMF 3 Executive Director SMF 4 Chief Risk Officer SMF 5 Head of Internal Audit SMF 7 Group Entity Senior Manager SMF 9 Chair of the Governing Body SMF10 Chair of the Risk Committee SMF11 Chair of the Audit Committee SMF12 Chair of the Remuneration Committee SMF13 Chair of the Nominations Committee SMF14 Senior Independent Director SMF16 Compliance Oversight SMF17 Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) SMF18 Other Overall Responsibility SMF24 Chief Operations

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 4 Function Description of senior management function Allocated? SMF27 Partner
2.02 Individuals at core SMCR firms will be automatically converted to new mapped senior management
functions, where applicable. The only exception is in the case of a firm’s Chair (see below). Under the Approved Persons Regime (APR), we do not specifically approve the firm’s Chair (individuals are approved under a CF2 – Non-Executive Director function). It is not possible to automatically convert such individuals to the new senior management function. As such, firms should use this form to notify us that a CF2 will be performing the Chair role under the SMCR. Failure to do so will mean that the individual will not be approved to perform the SMF9 role at Commencement. Core SMCR firms should only use this form where an existing CF2 (Non-Executive Director) under APR will be performing the SMF9 (Chair of the Governing Body) role at the firm. Function Description of senior management function UK core SMCR firm Effective Date SMF 9 Chair of the Governing Body

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 5
2.03 Provide details of each currently approved person who will perform a senior management function
following the commencement date in accordance with the Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016 and
section [XXXX] of the FCA Handbook, and provide details of which senior management functions are to be
carried out by each such approved person. If this is an update to a previous conversion notification, please complete Section 3. Note that individuals may only be mapped from their existing APR controlled function to an appropriate senior management function (SMF) as set out in Annex [X]. Function Description of senior management function Name of person to whom allocation of senior management function is proposed Current controlled function(s) held IRN SMF 1 Chief Executive SMF 2 Chief Finance SMF 3 Executive Director SMF 4 Chief Risk SMF 5 Head of Internal Audit SMF 7 Group Entity Senior Manager SMF 9 Chair of the Governing Body SMF10 Chair of the Risk Committee SMF11 Chair of the Audit Committee SMF12 Chair of the Remuneration Committee SMF13 Chair of the Nomination Committee SMF14 Senior Independent Director SMF16 Compliance Oversight SMF17 Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) SMF18 Other Overall Responsibility SMF24 Chief Operations SMF27 Partner

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 6
2.04 If you have submitted any applications for approval of individuals to perform one or more significant
influence functions that are currently subject to determination by the FCA and any of these individuals will perform a senior management function following commencement date in accordance with the Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016, and the [XXXX], provide details below of which senior management functions are to be carried out by each such approved person. Function Description of senior management function Name of person to whom allocation of senior management function is proposed Controlled functions applied for IRN or application reference SMF 1 Chief Executive SMF 2 Chief Finance SMF 3 Executive Director SMF 4 Chief Risk SMF 5 Head of Internal Audit SMF 7 Group Entity Senior Manager SMF 9 Chair of the Governing Body SMF10 Chair of the Risk Committee SMF11 Chair of the Audit Committee SMF12 Chair of the Remuneration Committee SMF13 Chair of the Nomination Committee SMF14 Senior Independent Director SMF16 Compliance Oversight SMF17 Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) SMF18 Other Overall Responsibility SMF24 Chief Operations SMF27 Partner

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 7
2.05 If there are one or more individuals currently approved to perform significant influence function CF2, who will
remain at the firm in the capacity of a non-executive director following commencement date, and such individuals are not listed above in Section 2.01, please list them below. IRN Name of individual
2.06 If you have submitted any applications for approval of individuals to significant influence function CF2 under
the approved persons regime that are currently subject to determination by the FCA, who will remain at the firm in the capacity of a non-executive director following commencement date, and such individuals are not listed above in Section 2.02, please list them below. IRN Name of individual

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 8 Update Notification Section 3
3.00 If you need to update or correct a previous conversion notification, please provide details of these
amendments below.
IRN Name of individual
Controlled Function Proposed Senior Management Function(s) Details of change and reasons for such change. IRN Name of individual Controlled Function Proposed Senior Management Function(s) Details of change and reasons for such change.

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 9 Statements of Responsibilities and Management Responsibilities Map Section 4
4.00 If submitting this form as an enhanced scope SMCR firm, please attach a statement of
responsibilities for each individual identified in this form as being converted to perform one or more senior management functions. Please also attach the firm’s management responsibilities map. A core SMCR firm which is completing this form to convert a CF2 to the Chair senior management function does not need to attach the statement of responsibilities for the Chair.
4.01 How many additional sheets are being submitted?

Form K - Conversion Notification Form (FCA Solo Regulated Firms) P a g e | 10 Declarations and signatures Section 5 Declaration In this declaration, the firm making the notification in relation to each individual is referred to as the “applicant”. The applicant must ensure that it has the authority of each individual in relation to whom it is making a notification for conversion to a senior management function to cause the information contained in this form relating to such individual to be submitted, and that it has made each such individual aware of their prospective regulatory responsibilities as set out in the FCA’s Code of Conduct (COCON). It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 – ‘FSMA’). The applicant must notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in this form and/or if inaccurate information has been provided. In addition to other regulatory responsibilities, firms and approved persons have a responsibility to disclose to the FCA matters of which it would reasonably expect to be notified. Failure to notify the FCA of such information may lead to the FCA taking disciplinary or other action against the firm and/or individuals. For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish to exercise your rights. The person signing on behalf of the applicant confirms that:

they have read this declaration in full;
they have confirmed that the information supplied is accurate and complete to the best of their knowledge, and
that each statement of responsibility submitted with this form accurately reflects the aspects of the affairs of the applicant which it is intended that the relevant individual will be responsible for managing in performing their proposed senior management functions. Name of the applicant Name of person signing on behalf of the applicant Position Signature Date

Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 1 Notification number (for FCA use only) Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime (Pre-Commencement version) FCA Handbook Reference: SUP TP 12 Terms defined in the FCA Handbook are italicised and should be construed accordingly. This form can only be used by solo-regulated SMCR firms. It is not relevant to dual regulated SMCR firms, appointed representatives or SMCR firms that are defined as an enhanced scope SMCR firm because they meet the qualification criteria in SYSC 23 Annex 1. Limited scope SMCR firms and core SMCR firms can use this form to notify the FCA that they agree to be subject to the rules for enhanced scope SMCR firms, set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1. Limited scope SMCR firms can use this form to notify the FCA that they agree to be subject to the rules for core SMCR firms, set out in SYSC 23 Annex 1. The pre-Commencement version of Form O can be submitted up to six months before the regime takes effect. If it is submitted three months or less before the regime takes effect, firms will need to submit the supporting documentation listed in Section 2 at the same time. The opt-up will take effect at Commencement. To withdraw a notification, firms must write to us before the opt-up takes effect. Once the opt-up has taken effect, firms can use Form O to revert to the SMCR classification defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1. This will be effective one year from the date of notification. Firms opting-up should ensure they understand and are in a position to comply with the relevant rules, set out in the FCA’s Senior management arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC), Supervision (SUP), Code of Conduct (COCON) sourcebooks. The decision should be made at the appropriate levels and approved at governing body level. As a result of opting-up, firms will be subject to rules relating to additional Senior Management Functions and Prescribed Responsibilities. Firms opting-up to enhanced scope SMCR firm classification will also be subject to requirements on Responsibilities Maps, Handover Procedures and Overall Responsibilities. [Commencement Date] Name of firm Firm Reference Number (FRN)

Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 2 Financial Conduct Authority 12 Endeavour Square Stratford London E20 1JN United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0) 300 500 0597 E-mail firm.queries@fca.org.uk Website http://www.fca.org.uk Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No 1920623. Registered Office as above

Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 3 Contact Details Section 1
1.1 Contact for this notification (at the notifying firm)
Title
First name
Surname
Job title
Business address
Postcode
Phone number
Email address

Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 4 Notification that the firm is opting-up Section 2 If this notification is being made more than three months before the Regime commences, please proceed to
Section 3.
2.01 Changes to the SMCR classification of the firm
Please indicate the type of notification you are making.
Notification type Firm response
Core SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for enhanced scope SMCR firms Limited scope SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for core SMCR firms Limited scope SMCR firm agreeing to be subject to the rules for enhanced scope SMCR firms
2.02 Supporting documents
Please tick to confirm that you are submitting the supporting documents listed in the table below with this notification. These documents must be submitted up to three months and at least one week before Commencement. Supporting documents Firms opting-up to Enhanced scope SMCR firm classification Limited Scope SMCR firms optingup to core SMCR firm classification Form A applications for new senior management functions Form K – Conversion notification * *Only required if a CF2 NonExecutive Director is going to perform the SMF9 – Chair function

Form O – Notification of change to firm classification under the Senior Managers & Certification Regime Page 5 Declarations and signatures Section 3 In this declaration, the authorised firm making the notification is referred to as the “firm”. The person signing on behalf of the firm confirms that:

they have read this declaration in full;
they have the authority of the firm’s governing body to make this notification;
the firm’s governing body understands their regulatory responsibilities following the opt-up, as set out in the
FCA’s Senior management arrangements, Systems and Controls (SYSC), Supervision (SUP), Code of Conduct (COCON) sourcebooks;
the firm’s governing body understands that, once the opt-up takes effect, the notifying firm will not be able to
revert to its previous SMCR classification (as defined in SYSC 23 Annex 1) for at least one year. It is a criminal offence, knowingly or recklessly, to give the FCA information that is materially false, misleading or deceptive (see sections 398 and 400 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000). The notifying firm must notify the FCA immediately if there is a change to the information in this form and/or if inaccurate information has been provided. For the purposes of complying with data protection legislation, please read the FCA’s privacy notice at https://www.fca.org.uk/data-protection. This notice will tell you what to expect when the FCA collects personal information, including how and why we use your personal information and who to contact if you have any queries or wish to exercise your rights. Name of the authorised firm

Name of person signing on behalf of the authorised firm

Position

Signature

Date

FCA 2018/XX
Part 2: Comes into force [ ] 20[ ] [main commencement date for solo-regulated firms]

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 1 Application number (for FCA use only) The FCA has produced notes which will assist both the applicant firm and the candidate in answering the questions in this form. Please read the notes, which are available on the FCA’s website at:
https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/handbook/SUP/10C/Annex3D.html Both the applicant and the candidate will be treated by the FCA as having taken these notes into consideration when completing this form. Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Application to perform controlled functions including senior management functions FCA Handbook Reference: SUP 10C Annex 3D [Commencement Date] Name of candidate (to be completed by applicant firm)

Name of applicant firm
(as entered in 2.01)
Firm reference number
(as entered in 2.02)
Financial Conduct Authority
12 Endeavour Square
Canary Wharf
London E20 1JN
United Kingdom
Telephone +44 (0) 300 500 0597
E-mail firm.queries@fca.org.uk
Website http://www.fca.org.uk
Registered as a Limited Company in England and Wales No 1920623. Registered Office as above

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 2 Personal identification details Section 1
1.01 a Candidate Individual Reference
Number (IRN) b OR name of previous regulatory body c AND previous reference number (if applicable)
1.02 Title
(e.g. Mr, Mrs, Ms)
1.03 Surname

1.04 ALL forenames
1.05 Name commonly known by
1.06 Date of birth
(dd/mm/yyyy)
1.07 National Insurance number
1.08 Previous name
1.09 Date of name change
1.10 a Nationality
b Passport number
(if National Insurance number not available)

1.11 Place of birth
1.12 Phone number
1.13 Email address
 I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 3
1.14 a Private address
b
Postcode

c
Dates resident at this address
(dd/mm/yyyy) From To PRESENT
(If address has changed in the last three years, please provide addresses for the previous three years.)
1.15 a Previous address 1
b
Postcode

c
Dates resident at this address
(dd/mm/yyyy) From To
1.15 a Previous address 2
b
Postcode

c
Dates resident at this address
(dd/mm/yyyy) From To
 I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 4 Firm identification details Section 2
2.01 Name of firm making the application
2.02 Firm Reference Number (FRN)
2.03 a Who should the FCA contact at the firm in
relation to this application?

B Position
C Phone number
D E-mail
 I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 5 Arrangement and Senior Management Functions Section 3A Complete this section if the application is for a senior management function. If you are submitting an application for a controlled function at an appointed representative, then please complete Section 3B. 3A.01 Nature of the arrangement between the candidate and the applicant firm. a Employee b Group employee Name of group c Contract for services d Partner f Other Give details Proposed date of appointment Length of appointment (if applicable) 3A.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the senior management functions to be performed. If the senior management functions are to be performed for more than one firm, please leave the boxes below blank and go to question 3A.04

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 6 3A.03 Job title Function Description of senior management function Tick (if applicable) Core firms Enhanced scope SMCR firms Effective Limited Date scope SMCR firms UK core SMCR firms EEA core SMCR firms Third country branches SMF 1 Chief Executive SMF 2 Chief Finance SMF 3 Executive Director SMF 4 Chief Risk SMF 5 Head of Internal Audit SMF 7 Group Entity Senior Manager SMF 9 Chair of the Governing Body SMF10 Chair of the Risk Committee SMF11 Chair of the Audit Committee SMF12 Chair of the Remuneration Committee SMF13 Chair of the Nomination Committee SMF14 Senior Independent Director SMF16 Compliance Oversight SMF17 Money Laundering Reporting Officer SMF18 Other overall responsibility function SMF19 Head of Third Country Branch SMF21 EEA Branch Senior Manager SMF24 Chief Operations SMF27 Partner SMF29 Limited scope function (limited scope SMCR firms only)

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 7 Insurance Distribution Will the candidate be responsible for insurance distribution at the firm? YES NO (Note: Yes can only be selected if the individual is applying for a governing function (other than a non-executive director function)) Mortgage Credit Directive Will the candidate be responsible for Mortgage Credit Directive Intermediation at the firm? YES NO (Note: Yes can only be selected if the individual is applying for a governing function (other than a non-executive director function))  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 8 3A.04 Complete this section only if the application is on behalf of more than one firm. List all firms within the group (including the firm entered in 2.01) for which the candidate requires approval and the requested senior management function for that firm. † Firm Reference Number Name of firm Senior Management Function Job title Responsible for insurance distribution? Responsible for MCD credit intermediation? Effective date a


I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 9 Arrangements and controlled functions – Appointed Representatives
Section 3B
Complete this section if the application is for a controlled function at an appointed representative (AR). If you are submitting an application for a senior management function, then please complete Section 3A. For limited permission consumer credit firms that are also appointed representatives, only the customer function is relevant in this section. For these firms, relevant senior management functions apply instead of the governing functions (ie CF1 (AR), CF3 (AR), CF4 (AR) and CF5 (AR)). We do not expect this to apply to many firms. 3B.01 Nature of the arrangement between the candidate and the applicant. a Appointed representative/tied agent – customer function AR firm name and reference number b Appointed representative/tied agent – governing function AR firm name and reference number c Other Give details 3B.02 For applications from a single firm, please tick the boxes that correspond to the controlled functions to be performed. If the controlled functions are to be performed for more than one firm, please go to question 3B.05. a Significant influence functions CF 1 (AR) Director function CF 3 (AR) Chief executive function CF 4 (AR) Partner function CF 5 (AR) Director of an unincorporated association function b Senior Management Functions (This section is only applicable for limited permission consumer credit firms that are ARs for other businesses) SMF1 (AR) Chief Executive function SMF3 (AR) Executive Director function SMF4 (AR) Partner function c Customer function CF 30 (AR) Customer function 3B.03 Effective date of controlled functions indicated above 3B.04 Job title Please refer to notes on the requirements for submitting a CV  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6† YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 10 3B.05 Complete this section only if the application is on behalf of more than one firm. List all firms within the group (including the firm entered in 2.01) for which the candidate requires approval and the requested controlled function for that firm. † Firm Reference Number Name of firm Controlled function Job title Effective date a b c d e  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 11 Employment history in the past 5 years Section 4 N.B.: ALL gaps must be accounted for
4.01 Employment details (1)
a Period (dd/mm/yyyy) From To b Nature of employment a Employed b Self-employed c Not employed d Full-time education If c or d is ticked, please give details c Name of employer d Nature of business e Previous / other names of employer f Last known address of employer

g Is/was employer regulated by a regulatory body? YES NO Name of regulatory body

h Is/was employer an appointed representative/tied agent? YES NO If yes, of which firm?

i Position held j Responsibilities k Reason for leaving: a Resignation b Redundancy c Retirement d Termination/dismissal e End of contract f Other Specify

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 12
4.02 Employment details (2)
a Period (dd/mm/yyyy) From To b Nature of employment a Employed b Self-employed c Not employed d Full-time education If c or d is ticked, please give details c Name of employer d Nature of business e Previous / other names of employer f Last known address of employer

g Is/was employer regulated by a regulatory body? YES NO Name of regulatory body

h Is/was employer an appointed representative/tied agent? YES NO If yes, of which firm?

i Position held j Responsibilities

k Reason for leaving: a Resignation b Redundancy c Retirement d Termination/dismissal e End of contract f Other If ‘other’, please specify  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 13 Fitness and propriety Section 5
5.01 Criminal Proceedings
When answering the questions in this section the candidate should include matters whether in the UK or overseas. By virtue of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975, if the candidate is subject to the law of England and Wales, candidate must disclose spent convictions and cautions (other than a protected conviction or caution). By virtue of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exclusions and Exceptions) (Scotland) Order 2013 and the Rehabilitation of Offenders (Exceptions) Order (Northern Ireland) 1979, if the candidate is subject to the law of Scotland or Northern Ireland, the candidate must disclose spent convictions (other than a protected conviction). For the avoidance of doubt, references to the legislation above are references to the legislation as amended. If any question has been answered ‘yes’ in Section 5, further details should be provided in Section 6 If there is any other information the candidate or the firm considers to be relevant to the application, it must be included in
Section 6
5.01.1a Has the candidate ever been convicted of any criminal offence (whether spent or not and whether or not in the United Kingdom):
i. involving fraud, theft, false accounting, offences against
the administration of public justice (such as perjury, perverting the course of justice and intimidation of witnesses or jurors), serious tax offences or other dishonesty or
ii. relating to companies, building societies, industrial and
provident societies, credit unions, friendly societies, insurance, banking or other financial services, insolvency, consumer credit or consumer protection, money laundering, market manipulations or insider dealing? YES NO b Is the candidate currently the subject of any criminal proceedings, whether in the UK or elsewhere? YES NO c Has the candidate ever been given a caution in relation to any criminal offence? YES NO 5.01.2 5.01.3 Has the candidate any convictions for any offences other than those in
5.01.1 above (excluding traffic offences that did not result in a ban
from driving or did not involve driving without insurance)? Is the candidate the subject of any ongoing criminal investigation? YES NO
5.01.4 Has the candidate been ordered to produce documents pursuant to
any ongoing criminal investigation or been the subject of a search (with or without a warrant) pursuant to any ongoing criminal investigation? In answering question 5.01.4, you should include all matters even where the candidate was not the subject of the investigation. YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 14
5.01.5 Has any firm at which the candidate holds or has held a position of
influence ever:
(Please check the guidance notes for the meaning of ‘position of influence’ in the context of the questions in this part of the form.) a Been convicted of any criminal offence? YES NO b Been summonsed, charged with or otherwise investigated or prosecuted for any criminal offence? YES NO c Been the subject of any criminal proceeding which has not resulted in a conviction? YES NO d Been ordered to produce documents in relation to any criminal investigation or been the subject of a search (with or without a warrant) in relation to any criminal investigation? YES NO In answering question 5.01.5, you should include all matters even when the summons, charge, prosecution or investigation did not result in a conviction, and, in respect of 5.01.5d, even where the firm was not the subject of the investigation. However, firms are not required to disclose details of any specific individuals who were subject to historic (as opposed to ongoing) criminal investigations, prosecutions, summons or other historic criminal proceedings.  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 15
5.02 Civil Proceedings
5.02.1 Has the candidate, ever been the subject of a judgement debt or
award against the candidate? (whether satisfied or not?) YES NO Please give a full explanation of the events in questions. The candidate should include all County Court Judgement(s) (CCJs) made against the candidate, whether satisfied or not); and i) the sum and date of all judgements debts, awards or CCJs (whether satisfied or not); and ii) the total number of all judgement debts, awards or CCJs ordered.
5.02.2 Has the candidate ever been party to any civil proceedings which
resulted in any order against the candidate (other than a judgement debt or award referred to in 5.02.1 above)? (the candidate should include, for example, injunctions and employment tribunal proceedings.) YES NO
5.02.3 Is the candidate aware of:
a Any proceedings that have begun or anyone’s intention to begin proceedings against the candidate, for a CCJ or another judgement debt? YES NO b More than one set of proceedings, or anyone’s intention to begin more than one set of proceedings, that may lead to a CCJ or other judgement debt? YES NO YES NO
5.02.4 Does the candidate have any current judgement debts (including
CCJs) made under a court order still outstanding, whether in full or in
part?
YES NO
5.02.5 Has the candidate ever failed to satisfy any such judgment debts
(including CCJs) made under a court order still outstanding, whether in full or part, within one year of the order being made? YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 16
5.02.6 Has the candidate ever:
a Filed for the candidate’s own bankruptcy or had a bankruptcy petition served on the candidate? YES NO b Been adjudged bankrupt? YES NO c Been the subject of a bankruptcy restrictions order (including an interim bankruptcy restrictions order) or offered a bankruptcy restrictions undertaking? YES NO d Made any arrangements with the candidate’s creditors, for example a deed of arrangement or an individual voluntary arrangement (or in Scotland a trust deed)? YES NO e Had assets sequestrated? YES NO f Been involved in any proceedings relating to the above matters even if such proceedings did not result in the making of any kind of order against the candidate or result in any kind of agreement with the candidate? YES NO
5.02.7 Does the candidate, or any undertaking under their management, have
any outstanding financial obligations arising from regulated activities, which have been carried out in the past (whether or not in the UK or overseas)? YES NO
5.02.8 Has the candidate ever been adjudged by a court or tribunal (whether
criminal, civil or administrative) for any fraud, misfeasance, negligence, wrongful trading or other misconduct? Or been found by a judge or tribunal to have lied on oath and/or that their evidence was to be disbelieved? YES NO
5.02.9 Is the candidate currently:
a Party to any civil proceedings (including those covered in 5.02.7 above)? YES NO b Aware of anybody’s intention to begin civil proceedings against the candidate? (Candidate should include any ongoing disputes whether or not such dispute is likely to result in any order against the candidate.) YES NO
5.02.10 During the period over which the candidate has held a position of
influence and/or in the 10 years after this, has any firm at which the candidate holds or has held a position of influence ever been:
YES NO a Adjudged by a court civilly liable for any fraud, misfeasance, wrongful trading or other misconduct? YES NO b The subject of a judgement debt or award against the firm? (Candidate should include all CCJs made against the firm, whether satisfied or not.) YES NO c Party to any other civil proceedings which resulted in an order against the firm other than in relation to matters covered in 5.02.10a and 5.02.10b above? YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 17
5.02.11 Is any firm at which the candidate currently holds or has held, within
the last 12 months from the date of the submission of this form, a position of influence currently:
a a party to civil proceedings; and/or? YES NO b aware of anyone’s intention to begin civil proceedings against them? YES NO
5.02.12 Has any company, partnership or unincorporated association of
which the candidate is or has been a controller, director, senior manager, partner or company secretary, in the UK or elsewhere, at any time during their involvement, or within one year of such an involvement, been put into liquidation, wound up, ceased trading, had a receiver or administrator appointed or entered into any voluntary arrangement with its creditors? YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 18
5.03 Business and Employment Matters
5.03.1 Has the candidate ever been:
a Disqualified from acting as a director or similar position (one where the candidate acts in a management capacity or conducts the affairs of any company, partnership or unincorporated association)? YES NO b The subject of any proceedings of a disciplinary nature (whether or not the proceedings resulted in any finding against the candidate)? YES NO c The subject of any investigation which has led or might lead to disciplinary proceedings? YES NO d Notified of any potential proceedings of a disciplinary nature against the candidate? YES NO e The subject of an investigation into allegations of misconduct or malpractice in connection with any business activity? (This question covers internal investigation by an authorised firm, as well as investigation by a regulatory body, at any time.) YES NO
5.03.2 Has the candidate ever been refused entry to, or been dismissed,
suspended or requested to resign from, any professional, vocation, office or employment, or from any fiduciary office or position of trust whether or not remunerated? YES NO
5.03.3 Does the candidate have any material written complaints made against
the candidate by the candidate’s clients or former clients in the last five years which the candidate has accepted, or which are awaiting determination, or have been upheld – by an ombudsman or complaints scheme? YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 19
5.04 Regulatory Matters
5.04.1 In relation to activities regulated by the FCA or any other regulatory
body (see the guidance notes on Section 5), has:

the candidate, or
any company, partnership or unincorporated association of
which the candidate is or has been a controller, director, senior manager, partner or company secretary, during the candidate’s association with the entity and for a period of three years after the candidate ceased to be associated with it, ever – a Been refused, had revoked, restricted, been suspended from or terminated, any licence, authorisations, registration, notification, membership or any other permission granted by any such body? YES NO b Been criticised, censured, disciplined, suspended, expelled, fined or been the subject of any other disciplinary or interventional action by any such body? YES NO c Received a warning (whether public or private) that such disciplinary or interventional action may be taken against the candidate or the firm? YES NO d Been the subject of an investigation by any regulatory body, whether or not such an investigation resulted in a finding against the candidate or the firm? YES NO e Been required or requested to produce documents or any other information to any regulatory body in connection with such an investigation (whether against the firm or otherwise)? YES NO f Been investigated or been involved in an investigation by an inspector appointed under companies or any other legislation, or required to produce documents to the Secretary of State, or any other authority, under any such legislation? YES NO g Ceased operating or resigned whilst under investigation by any such body or been required to cease operating or resign by any regulatory body? YES NO h Decided, after making an application for any licence, authorisation, registration, notification, membership or any permission granted by any such body, not to proceed with it? YES NO i Been the subject of any civil action related to any regulated activity which has resulted in a finding by a court? YES NO j Provided payment services or distributed or redeemed e-money on behalf of a regulated firm or itself under any contractual agreement where that agreement was terminated by the regulated firm? YES NO k Been convicted of any criminal offence, censured, disciplined or publicly criticised by any inquiry, by the Takeover Panel or any governmental or statutory authority or any other regulatory body (other than as indicated in this group of questions). YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 20
5.04.2 In relation to activities regulated by the FCA or any other regulatory
body, has the candidate or any firm at which the candidate holds or has held a position of influence at any time during and within one year of the candidate’s association with the firm ever:
a Been found to have carried on activities for which authorisation or registration by the FCA or any other regulatory body is required without the requisite authorisations? YES NO b Been investigated for the possible carrying on of activities requiring authorisation or registration by the FCA or any other regulatory body without the requisite authorisation whether or not such investigation resulted in a finding against the candidate? YES NO c Been found to have performed a senior management function or other controlled function (or an equivalent function requiring approval by the FCA or any other regulatory body) without the requisite approval? YES NO d Been investigated for the possible performance of a senior management function or other controlled function (or an equivalent function requiring approval by the FCA or any other regulatory body) without the requisite approval, whether or not such investigation resulted in a finding against the candidate? YES NO e Been found to have failed to comply with an obligation under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 or Payment Services Regulations 2009 to notify the FCA of the identity of a person acting in a position of influence over its electronic money or payment services business? YES NO f Been the subject of a prohibition order under section 56 FSMA, or received a warning notice proposing that such a direction or order be made, or received a private warning? YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 21
5.05 Other Matters
5.05.1 Is the candidate, in the role to which the application relates, aware of
any business interests, employment obligations, or any other circumstance which may conflict with the performance of the senior management functions for which approval is now being sought? YES NO
5.05.2 Is the candidate or the firm aware of any other information relevant to
this notification that the FCA might reasonably expect from the candidate? YES NO
5.05.3 Has the firm undertaken a criminal records check in accordance with
the requirements of the FCA?
Please note that a firm is required to request the fullest information that it is lawfully able to obtain about the candidate under Part V of the Police Act 1997 (Certificates of Criminal records, etc) and related subordinated legislation of the UK or any part of the UK before making the application. (SUP 10C.10) If yes, please enter date the check was undertaken YES NO Date (dd/mm/yy):
Note: if date is more than 3 months prior to current date or 3 months prior to date of application submission or the check has not been undertaken, please provide details why in Section 6.
5.05.4 Has / Have a reference or references been obtained from current or
previous employer(s) in accordance with the requirements of the FCA? If No, please provide details why the reference or references has/have not been obtained. Please note that a firm is required to use reasonable steps to obtain an appropriate reference from any current or previous employer of the candidate during the last 6 years (see SYSC 22). “Employer” has an extended meaning for these purposes. YES NO  I have supplied further information related to this page in Section 6 YES NO

Long Form A – Solo-regulated firms (including EEA and third country) Page | 22 Supplementary information for Senior Management Functions Section 6 6.01 6.02 Please provide full details of:
a) why the candidate is competent and capable to carry out the controlled function(s) applied for; b) why the appointment complements the firm's business strategy, activity and market in which it operates; c) how the appointment was agreed including details of any discussions at governing body level (where applicable); d) a list of all directorships currently or previously held by the candidate in the past 10 years (where director has the meaning given in the Glossary); and If there is any additional information indicated in previous sections or any other information the candidate or the firm considers being relevant to this application it must be included here. (Please also provide full details of any issues that could affect the Fitness and Propriety of the individual that arose when leaving an employer listed in Section 4 or if any question has been answered ‘yes’ in Section 5) Question Information
6.03 Firms must also provide the following supporting documents required with this form
(please tick)
Statement of responsibilities
Candidate’s Curriculum Vitae (C.V)
Role(s) description
Organisational chart
A description or copy of the candidate’s Skills Gap Analysis A description or copy of the candidate’s Induction programme A description or copy of the candidate's Learning and Development plan (including the name of the individual responsible for monitoring the candidate's progress against the development points and the time frame for completion) A description or documentation setting out how the competency was assessed (demonstrating competence and suitability mapped to the specific role and responsibilities of the role).
6.04 In addition, enhanced scope SMCR firms must also provide:-
A copy of the firm’s management responsibilities map (SYSC 25 and SUP 10C.9) A summary of any handover material (SYSC 25.9 and SUP 10C.10)

PS18/14: Extending the Senior Managers and Certification Regime to FCA firms

Lineage: Amended

Timeline

Similar documents from other regulators