2024-05-02
Added · Updated
New Zealand AML/CFT supervisors issued this guideline to support reporting entities in conducting customer due diligence for company customers under the AML/CFT Act 2009. It mandates the identification and verification of beneficial owners, persons acting on behalf of companies, and nominee arrangements, while outlining simplified, standard, and enhanced CDD requirements based on risk. The document incorporates regulatory updates effective June 2024 that formalize information gathering regarding a company's legal structure, ownership, and control.
RBNZ published 20 documents in the last 30 days — get each new one by email the day it lands.
1
AML/CFT
Anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism Customer Due Diligence:
Companies
Guideline
This guideline should be read together with the Beneficial Ownership and Enhanced Customer Due Diligence guidelines. April 2024
2
Introduction
3
10. The CDD process you follow (simplified, standard, or enhanced) is determined by the
level of risk posed by your customer.
Customers
Simplified CDD
11. You can conduct simplified CDD on specific types of companies that are considered
low risk for ML/TF.
3
12.This includes:4
3 Effective 1 June 2024, Regulation 12AA of the AML/CFT (Requirements and Compliance) Regulations 2011 states that enhanced CDD must be conducted if there are grounds to report a suspicious activity in circumstances otherwise eligible for simplified CDD. 4 See section 18(2) of the Act for the full list of who can qualify for simplified CDD. 5 Section 15 of the Act. 6 Section 16(1)(a) of the Act. 7 Section 17 of the Act. Refer also to the Enhanced Customer Due Diligence Guideline for more information. 8 There are some exceptions to this, including any company which qualifies for simplified CDD.
4
18.A beneficial owner is the individual(s) (i.e. a natural person(s)) who ultimately owns or controls the company. It is crucial to know who the beneficial owner(s) is so that you can make appropriate decisions about the level of ML/TF risk presented by the company. Refer to the Beneficial Ownership Guideline for further information. 19.You must identify all beneficial owners. For each beneficial owner of a company, you must obtain the individual’s full name, date of birth, address, and their relationship to the company (for example shareholder, director or CEO). You must then take reasonable steps, according to the level of ML/TF risk, to verify this information, so that you are satisfied who the beneficial owner is. You must also take reasonable steps to determine if the beneficial owner of the company is a politically exposed person.9 20.To identify the beneficial owner(s), you should establish and understand the company’s ownership and control structure. This includes identifying and examining any nominee director or shareholder arrangements that are in place (see paragraphs [22] to [25] below). The individual’s ownership or control may be indirect, for example through several layers of ownership. Where a shareholder (or director in other jurisdictions) or any other party holding a similar role is a legal person or arrangement, the beneficial owner(s) of that legal person or arrangement should be identified. 21.Where there are complex ownership structures with no reasonable explanation, you should consider the possibility that the structure is used to hide the beneficial owner(s), whether enhanced CDD should be conducted, and whether a suspicious activity report should be submitted. Nominee directors or nominee shareholders 22.The involvement (or otherwise) of a nominee director or a nominee shareholder in a company is an important consideration when assessing the level of ML/TF risk. 23.A nominee director or nominee shareholder is a person who must follow, or is accustomed to follow, the instructions or directions of another person who is not a director or shareholder of the company when carrying out their role.10 This other/instructing person is sometimes called a ‘shadow director’ or ‘silent partner’. This relationship can be informal (such as acting on the verbal instructions of a family member or a business associate), or formal (such as setting up a nominee director agreement with a professional intermediary such as a lawyer, accountant, or trust and company service provider). 24.Nominee director or nominee shareholder arrangements are sometimes used to protect or disguise a company’s beneficial owner(s). For example, a nominee director could make all their decisions on the instructions of an underlying third party, who in 9 Section 26 of the Act. 10 Note that ‘nominee director’ and ‘nominee shareholder” are not recognised terms used under the Companies Act 1993. However, these terms are defined for the purposes of the Act – refer
Regulation 3 of the AML/CFT (Requirements and Compliance) Regulations 2011. Note also that these terms are used in some other countries, which will be relevant if you establish a business relationship with a customer that is an overseas company.
5 practice is the natural person with effective ownership or control of the company. In this circumstance, the underlying third party would be considered a beneficial owner of the company. 25.While there are legitimate reasons for the use of nominee directors or nominee shareholders, companies which have these arrangements also present a higher ML/TF risk. Nominee director or nominee shareholder arrangements can be misused to facilitate money laundering and other types of criminal offending. For example, criminals or terrorists can use nominees to obscure their involvement in a transaction or activity. Additional standard CDD requirements for companies 26.Effective 1 June 2024, Regulation 11 of the AML/CFT (Requirements and Compliance) Regulations 2011 introduces additional requirements when conducting standard CDD for a company. 27.This regulation formalises the information you are required to obtain and verify as
part of standard CDD.
11 This is intended to assist you to understand the company’s legal structure(s), to accurately identify its beneficial owner(s) (refer paragraph [17] to [21] above) and in turn, assist to determine the level of risk associated with the company. 28.Under Regulation 11, you must obtain, and according to the level of risk verify, information relating to:
6 existence of a nominee director, a nominee shareholder13 and in turn, the identity of the beneficial owner(s). 32.It may be necessary to include some additional questions as part of your onboarding process to comply with Regulation 11. However, for company types you are familiar with and onboard regularly (e.g. New Zealand incorporated companies), this does not need to be extensive (unless the level of risk requires it). 33.Obtaining required information – The first step is to ask for the information from the company. This could include asking direct questions (verbally or in writing) or by using yes/no tick box questions (for example on an application form). You should record the company’s responses in writing, including retaining any written correspondence you receive. You must obtain information on the following:
7 be on the basis of data, documents or information from a reliable and independent source. 15 In many circumstances, you may be able to utilise publicly available information, such as on a Companies Register. 38.In relation to the existence and name of any nominee director or nominee shareholder, you are only required to verify this using information, documents or data issued by a reliable source. It does not need to be independent. 16 You can therefore use information, documents or data issued by the company. This may include:
8 of the company. Effective 1 June 2024 additional enhanced CDD measures may also be required.23 41.Refer to the Enhanced Customer Due Diligence Guideline for further information. Any person acting on behalf of a company 42.You must also identify and verify the identity of any person acting on behalf of a company, and their authority to act. A person is acting on behalf of a company if they are authorised to carry out transactions or other activities with you on the company’s behalf. This includes persons such as an accountant or another person able to transact on the business account. 43.You must obtain the person’s full name, date of birth and address (if an individual), full name, entity identifier or registration number, address or registered office (if not an individual), and the person’s relationship to the company. In some circumstances, this person may also be a beneficial owner of the company. In other circumstances, this may be an additional person that you must conduct CDD on. When entities are appointed, you also need to identify the individual(s) representing the entity. Identification and verification of all such individuals must be to the extent required by the Act. 44.When a company is a customer with whom you have an existing business relationship, you must identify the identity of any new person acting on behalf of the company. This applies when you have previously conducted CDD on the company. You must obtain the full name and date of birth of the new person acting on behalf of the company, and their relationship to the company.24 45.You must take reasonable steps, according to the level of ML/TF risk, to verify the information you have obtained, so that you are satisfied who the person is and that they have authority to act. 46.Refer to the Acting on behalf of a customer factsheet and Beneficial ownership guideline for further information. AML/CFT programme 47.Your procedures, policies, and controls for CDD must be documented in your AML/CFT programme. This should include how your business will determine the applicable level of CDD required, and what you will do if you are unable to conduct CDD. 23 Regulation 12AB of the AML/CFT (Requirements and Compliance) Regulations 2011. 24 Section 18(3) of the Act. Note also Part 19 of the AML/CFT Class Exemptions Notice 2018. This provides an exemption from the requirement to conduct CDD (under s18(3) of the Act) on a person acting on behalf of a customer by electronic means, subject to certain conditions and a written agreement between the reporting entity and the customer.
9
Version History
April 2013 Original version
July 2019 Reviewed with no changes made.
October 2022 Full revised version. The additions to the guideline reflect regulation changes that expand the types of companies that qualify for simplified CDD and require CDD for nominee directors. Minor changes have been made to the guideline to reflect the enhanced CDD guideline. The remaining changes are not substantial and have been made for reasons of clarity. April 2024 Updated following new regulation effective 1 June 2024 with additional standard CDD requirements for legal persons. Disclaimer: This guideline has been produced by the AML/CFT supervisors under section 132(2)(c) of the Act. It is intended to assist reporting entities to understand their customer due diligence obligations under the Act for their customers who are companies. This guideline does not constitute legal advice. Where AML/CFT Guidelines are referenced, they can be accessed at the following websites:
Department of Internal Affairs http://bit.ly/2gQ3Iev Reserve Bank of New Zealand http://bit.ly/2n6RYdp Financial Markets Authority https://bit.ly/3fjcKlD
Note from RegAlert. AI assistants can read this document in full, and search 70,000+ more, through the RegAlert MCP connector (https://mcp.regalert.today/mcp). Free with an account. How to connect ChatGPT, Claude or Cursor.
Source: Reserve Bank of New Zealand — original document · Summary generated with machine assistance and reviewed before publication; the authoritative text is the regulator's original document. How RegAlert works